Thesis-Template-4Rd Version
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2001-12 The Karabagh conflict and its effects on Turkey's role in the Caucasus Akdeniz, Bulent. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1418 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS THE KARABAGH CONFLICT AND ITS EFFECTS ON TURKEY’S ROLE IN THE CAUCASUS by Bulent Akdeniz December 2001 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Glenn E. Robinson Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2001 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTIT LE: The Karabagh Conflict And Its Effects On Turkey’s 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Role In The Caucasus 6. AUTHOR(S) Bulent Akdeniz 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) This thesis examines the Karabagh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia and its implications on the Caucasus regional security in general and Turkey’s role in particular. It investigates the causes of the conflict from a theoretical, historical and practical view and evaluates the role of the various international actors in the conflict. This thesis also traces the role of oil and oil politics in resolving the conflict and contrarily examines how the conflict affects the development of the oil in the Caucasus region. This study concludes that the Karabagh conflict and the ensuing events eroded the Turkish role in the Caucasus and created a situation prone to instability and renewed violence. This study provides specific recommendations for Turkish foreign policy makers to enhance the stability in the region without sacrificing Turkish interests. Recommendations include increased relations and engagement with Iran and Russia and the further containment of Armenia until a dramatic change in its attitude is observed. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Karabagh, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Caspian Oil, Turkish Foreign Policy, and 15. NUMBER OF Caucasus PAGES 133 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT This thesis examines the Karabagh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia and its implications on the Caucasus regional security in general and Turkey’s role in particular. It investigates the causes of the conflict from a theoretical, historical and practical view and evaluates the role of the various international actors in the conflict. This thesis also traces the role of oil and oil politics in resolving the conflict and contrarily examines how the conflict affects the development of the oil in the Caucasus region. This study concludes that the Karabagh conflict and the ensuing events eroded the Turkish role in the Caucasus and created a situation prone to instability and renewed violence. This study provides specific recommendations for Turkish foreign policy makers to enhance the stability in the region without sacrificing Turkish interests. Recommendations include increased relations and engagement with Iran and Russia and the further containment of Armenia until a dramatic change in its attitude is observed. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 II. THEORY AND THE ROOTS OF THE CONFLICT ..............................................7 III. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE KARABAGH CONFLICT...............21 A. THE EARLY PERIOD IN AZERBAIJANI-ARMENIAN RELATIONS (1905-1987) .............................................................................22 B. RESURGENCE IN THE KARABAGH CONFLICT (1987-1991)............26 C. ESCALATION AND WAR (1991-1994)......................................................33 D. MEDIATION PROCESS IN THE CONFLICT (1994-) ............................43 IV. ARMENIA..................................................................................................................51 A. ARMENIAN- RUSSIAN RELATIONS.......................................................53 B. ARMENIAN-IRANIAN RELATIONS........................................................56 C. ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS.......................................................59 D. ARMENIAN-U.S RELATIONS ...................................................................66 E. CONCLUSION...............................................................................................66 V. AZERBAIJAN...........................................................................................................69 A. AZERBAIJANI-RUSSIAN RELATIONS...................................................71 B. AZERBAIJANI-IRANIAN RELATIONS...................................................76 C. AZERBAIJANI-TURKISH RELATIONS..................................................78 D. AZERBAIJANI-U.S RELATIONS..............................................................83 E. CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................86 V. OIL AND PIPELINE ISSUES ..................................................................................89 A. RUSSIA’S ROLE IN THE CASPIAN REGION ........................................91 B. LEGAL STATUS OF THE CASPIAN SEA................................................93 C. IRAN’S ROLE IN THE CASPIAN REGION.............................................95 D. TURKISH/U.S POSITION IN THE REGION ...........................................96 E. OIL RESERVES AND AGREEMENTS IN THE CASPIAN REGION ..97 F. BAKU-CEYHAN ROUTE AND TURKISH VIEWS ................................99 G. TURKISH STRAITS AND RELATED ECOLOGICAL AND SAFETY CONCERNS ................................................................................101 H. ARMENIAN VIEWS ON CASPIAN OIL AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE KARABAGH CONFLICT ................................................................106 I. CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................109 VI. CONCUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................113 A. EFFECTS OF KARABAGH CONFLICT ON TURKEY’S ROLE IN THE REGION ..............................................................................................113 B. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AND ANAYSIS.........................................118 C. RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................121 vii BIBLIOGRAPHY................................................................................................................127 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST.......................................................................................133 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Occupied Azerbaijani Territories.....................................................................42 Figure 2. Republic of Armenia ........................................................................................52 Figure 3. Republic of Azerbaijan....................................................................................70 Figure 4. Pipeline Routes ................................................................................................91 Figure 5. Caspian Sea......................................................................................................94 Figure 6. The Bosphorus ...............................................................................................104 Figure 7. Proposed Pipelines Detours Circumventing the Bosphorus ..........................105 ix THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While writing this thesis, I received invaluable encouragement from my advisor, Professor Mikhail Tsypkin. I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Mikhail Tsypkin and my second reader, Professor Glenn E. Robinson for their guidance during my thesis. I would like to