UNITED NATIONS ~For the International Criminal Tribunal Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNITED NATIONS ~For the International Criminal Tribunal Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violat (,- ) UNITED NATIONS InternationalCriminal Tribunal ~for the CaseNo.ICTR- 2000-56-I Prosecutionof PersonsResponsible for Genocideand Other Serious Violations of Date" InternationalHumanitarian Law committed in the territoryof Rwandaand Rwandan ENGLISH Citizensresponsible forgenocide and other suchviolations committed inthe territory of Original"FRENCH neighbouringStates, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December1994 r THE PROSECUTOR VS. k.. 0 AUGUSTIN BIZIMUNGU AUGUSTIN NDINDILIYIMANA 7) FRANCOIS-XAVIER NZUWONEMEYE \ INNOCENT SAGAHUTU AMENDED INDICTMENT (Joinder) TheProsecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, by virtue of the power vested inhim under Article 17 of theStatute of the Intemational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (the "Statute ofthe Tribunal") charges: AUGUSTIN BIZIMUNGU, AUGUSTIN NDINDILIYIMANA, FRAN(~OIS-XAVIER NZUWONEMEYE and INNOCENT SAGAHUTU with CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, GENOCIDE or in the alternative, COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, and VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 COMMON TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS AND ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLII, offences punishable under Articles 2, 3, 4, 22 and23 of theStatute of theTribunal andunder Rwandan Criminal Law, to the extent that the latter is notcontrary to theStatute of the Tribunal. PII03-0075(E) 1 I Translationcertified by LSS,ICTR [ PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3a125/ TheProsecutor v.Augustin Bizimungu, Augustin Ndindiliyimana, Frangois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye, Innocent Sagahutze I. THE ACCUSED A ugustin Bizimungu ° AugustinBizimungu was bom on 28 August1952 in Mukaranjecommune, Byumba prdfecture,Rwanda. Atthe time of the events referred to inthis indictment, Augustin Bizimungu held the post of . Chiefof Staffof theRwandan Army. He wasappointed to thatpost on 16 April1994 and was promotedto therank of Major-Generalat the sametime. Previously, he hadbeen the Commanderof MilitaryOperations in Ruhengeri prdfecture. In his capacityas Chiefof Staffof the RwandanArmy, Augustin Bizimungu exercised , authorityover all soldiers in theRwandan Army. Augustin Ndindiliyimana AugustinNdindiliyimana was bomin 1943,in Nyaruhengericommune, Butare prefecture, , Rwanda. At thetime of the events referred toin this indictment, Augustin Ndindiliyimana heldthe post , of Chiefof Staff of theGendarmerie nationale. Hewas appointed tothat post on 2 September 1992. In hiscapacity as Chiefof Staffof theGendarmerie nationale, Augustin Ndindiliyimana . exercisedauthority over the entire Gendarmerie nationale and had disciplinary power over all gendarmes,even when the latter were on temporarydetachment. Francois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye Francois-XavierNzuwonemeye was born on 30 August1955 in Kigali-ruralprdfecture, , Rwanda. At thetime of theevents referred to in thisindictment, Franqois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye held , thepost of Commanderof theReconnaissance Battalion (RECCE) within the Rwandan Army. In his capacityas Commanderof the ReconnaissanceBattalion of the RwandanArmy, . Franqois-XavierNzuwonemeye exercised authority over all the units of thatBattalion. Innocent Sagahutu 10. InnocentSagahutu was born in Cyanguguprdfecture, Rwanda. PII03-0075(E) I Translationcertified byLSS, ICTR PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3a125/ TheProsecutor v. AugustinBizimungu, Augustin Ndindiliyimana, Franfois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye, lnnocent Sagahutu 11. At thetime of the events referred to in thisindictment, Innocent Sagahutu held the post of Second-in-Commandof the Reconnaissance Battalion (RECCE) within the Rwandan Army and of companycommander of A Companyof thesaid Battalion. He held the rank of Captain. 12. In hiscapacity as Second-in-Commandor Acting Commander of theReconnaissance Battalion of theRwandan Army, Innocent Sagahutu exercised authority over all the units of that Battalion. II. THE MILITARY POWER STRUCTURE 13. The Forcesarmdes rwandaises (FAR) was composedof the Armderwandaise(AR) and the Gendarmerienationale (GN). 14. TheForces armdes rwandaises did not have a unifiedgeneral staff. They were supervised by theMinister of Defence,under the direct authority of thePresident of theRepublic, the Commander-in-Chiefof the Forces armdes rwandaises. 15. Boththe Chief of StaffoftheRwandan Army and that of theGendarmerie nationale were each assistedby four bureaux: G-1 (Personnel andAdministration), G-2(Intelligence), G-3(Military Operations)andG-4 (Logistics). 16. Regardingthe Army, the territory of Rwandawas divided into various sectors of military operations.Each sector was headed by a militarycommander. The troops were divided into companiesand units within each sector. There were several elite units in the Rwandan Army, includingthe Presidential Guard, the Para-CommandoBattalion and the Reconnaissance Battalion. 17. Accordingto thelaws in forcein Rwandain 1994,the Rwandan Army was responsible for defendingthe national territory and, if necessary, cooperating with the Gendarmerie nationale in maintainingpublic order (see ordonnance l~gislative no.R85/25 dulO mai 1962 portant crdationde l’Armderwandaise) [Legislative Ordinance No. R85/25 of 10 May1962 relating to theestablishment of the Rwandan Army]. 18. TheGendarmerie nationale was, for its part, responsible formaintaining public law and order andenforcing the laws in forcein Rwanda.Its members were assigned to publicsecurity territorialcompanies and brigades (see Ddcret-Loi du 23 janvier1974 portant crdation de l’Armderwandaise) [Legislative decree of 23 January 1974 relating tothe establishment ofthe Gendarmerie]. 19. As of 1973,in Rwanda,the Gendarmerie had replaced the National Police force which had beenabolished and integrated into the National Army (see Arr~t~ Prdsidentiel no.86/08 du 26 juin1973 portant integration de la Police dans l’Arm~e rwandaise) [Presidential Decree No. 86/08of 26 June 1973 relating to theintegration of the Police force into the Rwandan Army]. PII03-0075(E) 3 [ Translationcertified by LSS,ICTR I PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3a125/ TheProsecutor v. AugustinBizimungu, Augustin Ndindiliyimana, Francois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye, Innocent Sagahuttt 20. Eachof themilitary forces (Army and Gendarmerie) could, following well defined procedures, whennecessary, join forces in order to fulfill its public service mandate (see Ddcret-Loi du23 janvier1974 supra) [Legislative decree of 23 January1974, supra]. 21. Underlaw, officers ofthe Rwandan Army had the duty to enforce general rules of discipline in respectofall soldiers under their authority, even those who were not members oftheir units (see ArrOt~Pr~sidentiel no.413/02 du 13 d~cembre1978 modifi~, portant R~glement de discipline des Forcesarmies rwandaises) [Amended Presidential Decree No. 413/02 of 13 December 1978establishing theRules of Disciplineof the Rwandan Armed Forces]. III. CHARGES, including a CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS: COUNT 1: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE 22. The Prosecutorof the IntemationalCriminal Tribunal for Rwandacharges Augustin Bizimungu,Augustin Ndindiliyimaua, Franqois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye and Innocemt Sagahutuwith Conspiracy to CommitGenocide, an offencepunishable under Article 2 (3) (b)of the Statute, inthat, before 6 April 1994, and, after the tragic death of President Juvdnal Habyarimana,between 6 Apriland July1994, in Rwanda,Augustin Bizimungu, Augustiu Ndindiliyimana,Franqois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye and InnocentSagahutu decided and executeda common scheme with some or allof the following: Presidents Juvdnal Habyarimana and ThdodoreSindikubwabo, Prime Minister Jean Kambanda, Defence Minister Augustin Bizimana,General Ddogratias Nsabimana, Colonels Thdoneste Bagosora, Gratien Kabiligi and AnatoleNsengiyumva, Major Aloys Ntabakuze, Major Protais Mpiranya, the MRND Chairman andofficials, Mathieu Ngirumpatse, Joseph Nzirorera and Juvdnal Kajelijeli, Prdfet-Colonel TharcisseRenzaho, Nyaruhengeri Bourgmestre Charles Kabeza, Joseph Kanyabashi from Butare,and numerous other administrators, soldiers and civilians who espoused their cause to destroy,inwhole or in part,the Tutsi ethnic group which was one ofthe component elements of theRwandan population; PursuanttoArticle 6(1) of the Statute: either by their acts or obstinate refusal tomobilise the Forcesarmies rwandaises tofulfill their legal mandate to maintainand safeguard public peace, theAccused, in concertwith the other actors mentioned above, planned, incited, ordered, committed,or otherwise, aided and abetted the planning, preparation or execution of the plannedextermination ofthe Tutsi ethnic group, as follows: 23. In late1990, after the massive attack launched inside Rwandan territory by theRwandan PatrioticFront (RPF) - a politico-militarymovement which recruited its members essentially fromthe Tutsiof thediaspora- Government officials from the Mouvement Rdpublicain Nationalpour la Ddmocratieet le Ddveloppement(MRND) and a numberof Hutumilitary officersinpositions of authority inthe Forces armdes rwandaises hadconceived the idea that theneutralization, indeed even the extermination ofthe Tutsi population ofRwanda would be PII03-0075(E) [ Translationcertified by LSS,ICTR [ PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3a125/ TheProsecutor v.Augustin Bizimungu, Augustin Ndindiliyimana, Franfois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye, Innocent Sagahutu thebest approach inorder to defeat the invaders and, by the same stroke, prevent the sharing of power,which seemed increasingly inevitable, given the configuration of forces at the time. 24. Between1991 and July 1994, that radical doctrine steadily gained in consistency, focusing on specificobjectives andadopting bellicose plans of action that heralded exclusion.
Recommended publications
  • ICTR-00-56-A AUGUSTIN NDINDILIYIMANA APPEALS CHAMBER FRANÇOIS-XAVIER NZUWONEMEYE INNOCENT SAGAHUTU V
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA CASE NO.: ICTR-00-56-A AUGUSTIN NDINDILIYIMANA APPEALS CHAMBER FRANÇOIS-XAVIER NZUWONEMEYE INNOCENT SAGAHUTU v. THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL TUESDAY, 11 FEBRUARY 2014 1402H APPEAL JUDGEMENT Before the Judges: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Liu Daqun Judge Carmel Agius Judge Khalida Rachid Khan Judge Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov For the Registry: Mr. Douglass Hansen Mr. John Tumati For the Prosecution: Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow Mr. James Arguin Mr. Abubacarr Tambadou Ms. Thembile M. Segoete Mr. Takeh Sendze Ms. Christiana Fomenky Ms. Sunkarie Ballah-Conteh Ms. Betty Mbabazi Mr. Deo Mbuto For the Accused Augustin Ndindiliyimana: Mr. Christopher Black Mr. Vincent Lurquin For the Accused François-Xavier Nzuwonemeye: Mr. Charles Taku Ms. Beth Lyons For the Accused Innocent Sagahutu: Mr. Fabien Segatwa Mr. Scott Martin Court Reporter: Deirdre O'Mahony NDINDILIYIMANA ET AL TUESDAY, 11 FEBRUARY 2014 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 MR. PRESIDENT: 4 Good afternoon to everybody. 5 6 Registrar, would you please call the case. 7 MR HANSEN: 8 Thank you, Your Honour. 9 10 The Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, composed of Judge Meron, 11 presiding; Judge Liu, Judge Agius, Judge Khan, and Judge Tuzmukhamedov is now sitting in open 12 session today, Tuesday, the 11th of February 2014 for the delivery of the appeal judgement in the 13 matter of Augustin Ndindiliyimana, François-Xavier Nzuwonemeye and Innocent Sagahutu verses the 14 Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-00-56-A. 15 MR. PRESIDENT: 16 Mr. Ndindiliyimana, can you follow the proceedings in a language you understand? 17 APPELLANT NDINDILIMANA: 18 Yes, sir, I can follow the proceedings in French.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Clippings
    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE A downtown view of central Freetown from above Hill Cot Road. PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Outreach and Public Affairs Office as at: Friday, 20 May 2011 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 International News Ouattara Asks ICC to Investigate Post-Poll Violence / RFI Page 3 ICTR Prosecutor Welcomes Ex-Army Chief's Sentence / The New Times Page 4 Military Officers Convicted of Killing of Premier / Hirondelle News Agency Page 5 State Seeks to Reply to Ocampo's Claims / The Standard Page 6 3 Thursday, 19 May 2011 Ouattara Asks ICC to Investigate Post-Poll Violence Côte d'Ivoire's President Alassane Ouattara has asked the International Criminal Court (ICC) to open an investigation into the violence that swept the country following the disputed November election. Ouattara sent a letter, dated 3 May, to ICC President Luis Moreno-Ocampo asking the court to investigate "the most serious crimes committed since 28 November 2010 throughout the Ivorian territory". ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has said his office is preparing to launch a formal investigation into mass killings which allegedly took place in the west African country. There were reports of a massacre of several hundred people in Duékoué, in the west of the country, in the fighting that followed November's presidential election. The UN, the African Union and the European Union all recognised Ouattara as the rightful winner.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Going to Rape You and Taste Tutsi Women”: Rape During the 1994 Rwandan Genocide
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenSIUC “We are going to rape you and taste Tutsi women”: Rape During the 1994 Rwandan Genocide Christopher W. Mullins Center for the Study of Crime, Delinquency and Corrections Southern Illinois University Carbondale Word count: 8883 This paper was made possible by the author’s receipt of the Charles Hill Research Excellence Award given by the University of Northern Iowa’s College of Social and Behavioral Science. I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Jessica Braccio for helping organize the data and Robin M. Cardwell-Mullins for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Please direct all correspondence to Christopher W. Mullins, Faner Hall 4226 Mail Code 4504 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale IL 62901 USA, 618-453-6368, fax 618-453-6377, email: [email protected] Abstract Over the past decades, scholars have paid greater attention to sexual violence, in both theorization and empirical analysis. One area which has been largely ignored, however, is the sexual violence during times of armed conflict. This paper examines the nature and dynamics of sexual violence as it occurred during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Drawing upon testimonies given to the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), descriptions of rapes--both singular and mass—were qualitatively analyzed. In general, three broad types of assaults were identified: opportunistic, assaults which seemed to be a product of the disorder inherent within the conflict; episodes of sexual enslavement; and genocidal rapes, which were framed by the broader genocidal endeavors occurring at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide in Rwanda: the Search for Justice 15 Years On
    Genocide in Rwanda: The search for justice 15 years on. An overview of the horrific 100 days of violence, the events leading to them and the ongoing search for justice after 15 years. 6 April 2009 | The Hague On the fifteenth anniversary of the plane crash killing former President Habyarimana which sparked one-hundred days of Genocide in Rwanda slaughtering over 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus, the Hague Justice Portal reflects on some of the important decisions, notable cases and remaining gaps in the ICTR’s ongoing search for justice. On 8 November 1994, seven months after the passenger plane carrying President Juvénil Habyarimana was shot out of the sky on the evening of April 6 1994 triggering Genocide in the little-known central African state of Rwanda, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 955 (1994) establishing the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The tribunal is mandated to prosecute “persons responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law”1, with its inaugural trial commencing on January 9 1997. According to Trial Chamber I, delivering its Judgment in this first case against a suspected génocidaire, “there is no doubt that considering their undeniable scale, their systematic nature and their atrociousness” the events of the 100 days subsequent to April 6, “were aimed at exterminating the group that was targeted.”2 Indeed, given the nature and extent of the violence between April and July 1994, it is unsurprising that the ICTR has been confronted with genocide charges in nearly every case before it. Within hours of the attack on the President’s plane roadblocks had sprung up throughout Kigali and the killings began; the Hutu Power radio station, RTLM, rife with conspiracy, goading listeners with anti-Tutsi propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Ndindilyimana Et
    INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Asoka de Silva, Presiding Judge Judge Taghrid Hikmet Judge Seon Ki Park Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 17 May 2011 PROSECUTOR Against Augustin NDINDILIYIMANA Augustin BIZIMUNGU François-Xavier NZUWONEMEYE Innocent SAGAHUTU Case No. ICTR-00-56-T SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE Office of the Counsel for the Defence Prosecutor: Mr. Alphonse Van Mr. Christopher Black & Mr. Vincent Mr. Moussa Sefon Lurquin for Augustin Ndindiliyimana Mr. Lloyd Strickland Mr. Gilles St. Laurent & Mr. Benoît Mr.Abubacarr Tambadou Henry for Augustin Bizimungu Ms. Faria Rekkas Mr. Charles Taku & Ms. Beth Lyons for F. X. Nzuwonemeye Mr. Fabian Segatwa & Mr. Saidou Doumbia for Innocent Sagahutu 17 May 2011 The Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana et al, ICTR-00-56-T CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 II. EVENTS IN RWANDA AFTER 6 APRIL 1994 ........................................................................ 2 III. PRELIMINARY ISSUES ........................................................................................................... 3 IV. FACTUAL FINDINGS ............................................................................................................... 3 A. COUNT 1: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ........................................................................... 3 B. COUNTS 2 AND 3: GENOCIDE AND COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE IN THE ALTERNATIVE ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutor's Statement to the UN Security Council
    Statement by Justice Hassan B. Jallow Prosecutor UN-ICTR & UN-MICT to the United Nations Security Council 5 December 2012 Mr. President, Your Excellencies, I am greatly honoured to brief you once more on the progress of the Completion Strategy of the ICTR and to present to you the first report on the work of the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) of the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. The trial phase of the OTP of the ICTR has now concluded save for the receipt of judgement in the case of Prosecutor v. Augustin Ngirabatware now scheduled to be delivered on 20th December 2012 which will mark the conclusion of the trial phase of the ICTR. Similarly, all trial related activities including updating of the files of the fugitives, R71 bis evidence preservation proceedings in respect of the three top-level fugitives i.e. Felicien Kabuga, Protais Mpiranya and Augustin Bizimana as well as litigation in respect of R11bis applications for the referral of cases to national jurisdictions have also been concluded except in the case of Prosecutor v. Benard Munyagishari which is pending on appeal. 1 | Address by Justice Hassan B. Jallow, Prosecutor ICTR & MICT to the Security Council on 5 December 2012 Our focus at the OTP-ICTR for the past six months has been and, for the ensuing months, will continue to be on the prosecution and completion of appeals, the preparation of OTP records for archiving and hand over to the Residual Mechanism, the completion of legacy, residual and closure issues as well as providing support to the OTP Arusha Branch of the Mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • ICTR-2001-73-T the PROSECUTOR CHAMBER III of the TRIBUNAL V
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA CASE NO. : ICTR-2001-73-T THE PROSECUTOR CHAMBER III OF THE TRIBUNAL v. PROTAIS ZIGIRANYIRAZO MONDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2005 1502H TRIAL Before the Judges: Inés Monica Weinberg de Roca, Presiding Lee Gacuiga Muthoga Khalida Rachid Khan For the Registry: Mr. Constant K. Hometowu Mr. Sheha Mussa For the Prosecution: Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow Mr. Wallace Kapaya Ms. Gina Butler Mr. Iskander Ismail For the Accused Protais Zigiranyirazo: Mr. John Philpot Mr. Peter Zaduk Court Reporters: Ms. Ann Burum Ms. Sherri Knox Ms. Jean Baigent Ms. Judith Baverstock ZIGIRANYIRAZO MONDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2005 I N D E X WITNESS For the Prosecution: ZUHDI JANBEK Examination-in-chief by Mr. Kapaya .......................................................................................................... 21 EXHIBITS Exhibit No. P. 1E and P. 1F ....................................................................................................................... 25 Exhibit No. P. 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 26 ANN BURUM - ICTR - TRIAL CHAMBER III - page i ZIGIRANYIRAZO MONDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2005 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 MADAM PRESIDENT: 3 Mr. Jallow. 4 MR. JALLOW: 5 Thank you very much. If it pleases the Court, My Lords, the Accused who is -- stands before us today, 6 Protais Zigiranyirazo, is charged with conspiracy to commit genocide, with genocide or, in the 7 alternative, complicity in genocide, crimes against humanity by extermination and murder, by virtue of 8 his responsibility under Article 6(1) of the statute of the Tribunal. 9 10 Your Honours, genocide and conspiracy to commit it and complicity in it are never an act of a single 11 individual but one of several, even many, individuals. This particular article obliges us, the Prosecution, 12 to prove individual responsibility of the Accused, and this we expect to do through the witnesses whom 13 we will be presenting before the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Rwandan Genocide Fugitive Arrested in the DRC
    Former Rwandan Genocide Fugitive Arrested in the DRC Today 9 December 2015 mark another turning point for victims of the Rwandan tragedy as the DRC authorities have arrested Mr. Ntaganzwa who was ʺindicted by the ICTR for genocide and crimes against humanity for the alleged massacre of thousands of Tutsis at various locations in his locality including at Cyahinda Parish and at Gasasa Hill during the 1994 Rwandan genocide against Tutsis during which moderate Hutus and others who opposed the genocide were killed.1 He was also alleged to have orchestrated the rape and sexual violence committed against many women, and was one of the six fugitives whose cases were referred to Rwanda by the Prosecutor of the ICTR under Rule 11bis for trialʺ2 Following his arrest in Kachanga, North Kivu, the Prosecutor of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunal Mr. Jallow Hassan has informed the Security Council about the arrest of Mr. Ntaganzwa, he has equally thanked the DRC authorities and urges them to immediately transfer him from Goma where he is being held to Arusha to face trials.3 His arrest was precipitated as a result of a ransom of five million US Dollars bounty, however, eight other fugitives (Felicien Kabuga, Augustin Bizimana, Protais Mpiranya, Fulgence Kayishema, Pheneas Munyarugarama, Aloys Ndimbati, Ryandikayo, and Charles Sikubwabo) are yet to be apprehended to face trials, there is equally a ransom of five million US dollars for any information leading to their capture.4 The accused ethnic origin is Hutu. He was a school teacher and football referee and from 1992 – 1994 held the position of secretary general for the National Republican Movement for Democracy and Development for Gisenyi city and equally the president of the Interahamwe militia for the Gisenyi prefecture, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Hannah Tonkin
    Dr Hannah Tonkin YEAR OF CALL: 2013 Hannah is dual qualified in Australia (New South Wales) and in England and Wales. Dr Hannah Tonkin is an experienced international lawyer specialising in international humanitarian law and policy, international human rights law and international criminal law. If you would like to get in touch with Hannah please contact the clerking team: [email protected] | +44 (0)20 7993 7600 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS Dr Hannah Tonkin is currently the Principal Legal Officer (International Law) at the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine and Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). She leads the programme of work on all issues related to international law across UNRWA's five fields of operation (Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, West Bank and Gaza) and provides strategic and technical leadership for the Agency's lawyers with a view to ensuring legally sound, timely, politically sensitive and consistent advice. Before commencing her current position, Hannah was the Director of Disability Rights at the Australian Human Rights Commission in Sydney. In that role she worked collaboratively with the disability sector and the Australian Government to remove discrimination and promote the rights of people with disability in Australia and around the world. Previously Hannah worked for 10 years at the UN and other international organisations around the world. She was the Head of UNRWA's Legal Office in Gaza from 2017 to 2019, where she managed a large team responsible for ensuring the provision of politically sensitive legal advice on a wide range of matters relating to UNRWA's operations in Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Assessment
    RWANDA ASSESSMENT October 2001 Country Information and Policy Unit CONTENTS I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.4 II GEOGRAPHY A Location and Climate 2.1 - 2.5 B Population 2.6 - 2.8 2.9 C Language III HISTORY A Military and Political Conflict, 1990 - 1994 3.1 - 3.4 B Genocide, April-July 1994 3.5 - 3.10 C The Aftermath, 1994-2001 3.11 - 3.30 D International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 3.31 - 3.40 3.41 - 3.51 E The Economy IV INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE A Government 4.1 - 4.11 B Judicial System 4.12 - 4.20 C Prisons 4.21 - 4.24 D Security 4.25 - 4.33 4.34 - 4.35 E International Instruments and General Practice V HUMAN RIGHTS A GENERAL ASSESSMENT 5.1 - 5.8 1 B SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION Freedom of Assembly and Political Association 5.9 - 5.13 Freedom of Religion 5.14 - 5.20 Freedom of Speech and of the Press 5.21 – 5.25 Ethnicity 5.26 - 5.31 Women and Children 5.32 - 5.47 C OTHER ISSUES Refugees, Freedom of Movement, Exit & Return 5.48 - 5.57 International Involvement 5.58 - 5.65 Regional Issues and Foreign Relations 5.66 - 5.71 5.72 - 5.73 Medical VI ANNEXES A CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS, 1899-2001 B PROMINENT PEOPLE C COMMON ABBREVIATIONS / POLITICAL GROUPS D BIBLIOGRAPHY I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate of the Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council
    United Nations A/69/206–S/2014/546 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 August 2014 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-ninth session Sixty-ninth year Item 72 of the provisional agenda* Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994 Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly and to the members of the Security Council the nineteenth annual report of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, submitted by the President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda in accordance with article 32 of its statute (see Security Council resolution 955 (1994), annex), which states: The President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall submit an annual report of the International Tribunal for Rwanda to the Security Council and to the General Assembly. * A/69/150. 14-57957 (E) 140814 *1457957* A/69/206 S/2014/546 Letter of transmittal 1 August 2014 Excellencies, I have the honour to submit the nineteenth annual report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994, dated 1 August 2014, to the General Assembly and the Security Council, pursuant to article 32 of the statute of the International Tribunal.
    [Show full text]
  • 62T6ri *Q6- , ^L { Z.Or3-6Iztis'i
    MrcT-t7_o2 62t6ri *q6- , ^l { z.or3-6iztis'i . \ 162,rb{s NATIONS UNIES MECANISME POUR LES TRIBUNAUX PNNAUX INTERNATIONAUX Receivedby the Registry Mechanismfor InternationalCriminal Affaire No. MICT-12-02 Tribunals FRANCAIS l4/0612013l5:09 -frt-olY\ou.,'*q,.F. Original: ANGLAIS LE PROCUREUR c. PROTAIS MPIRANYA onuxrnvrE ACTED'ACCUSATION VrOOrrrn Le Procureurdu Tribunalpdnal international pour le Rwanda,agissant en vertu despouvoirs d lui conf6rdspar I'article 17 du Statutdu Tribunalp6nal international pour le Rwanda(le < Statut>), accuse Protais MPIRANYA. Descrimes 6nonc6s ci-apris : En vertu de I'article2 du Statut: Premierchef - GENOCIDE - Deuxidmechef COMPLICITEDANS LE GENOCIDE(subsidiairement au premierchef) En vertu de I'article3 du Statut : Troisidmechef - ASSASSINATconstitutif de crimecontre I'humanitd Quatridmechef - EXTERMINATION constitutivede crimecontre I'humanitd Cinquidmechef - VIOL constitutifde crimecontre I'humanitd Sixidmechef - PERSECUTIoNconstitutive de crimecontre l'humanit6 Septidmechef - AUTRESACTES INHUMAINS constitutifsde crimescontre l'humanitd En vertu de I'article4 du Statut : - Huitidmechef MEURTREcommis en violationde l'article3 communet du protocoleII P(RM)12-0001(F) Traductioncertifi6e par la SSLdu TPIR €zoL,', CHARGESrvrpurnns A r,'accusn l. Sur la basedes faits exposdsdans le prdsentacte d'accusation,Protais MPIRANYA est poursuivi pour : Premier chef - Gdnocide en application des articles 2.3 a), 6.1, et 6.3 du Statut (par. 22 d 56\ Deuxidme chef - Complicitd dans le gdnocideen applicationdes articles2.3 e),6.1, et 6.3 du Statut(par.22 i 56, subsidiairementau chef 1) Troisidme chef - Assassinatconstitutif de crime contre l'humanitd en application des articles3 a), 6.1,et 6.3 du Statut,(par. 24, 25, 33 d 46 et 57 d 69) Quatridmechef - Extermination constitutive de crime contre I'humanit6 en application desarticles 3 b), 6.1, et 6.3 du Statut(par.
    [Show full text]