DOCSLIB.ORG

A Trigger for Long-Lived Coloured Or Charged Exotics for Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Trigger for Long-Lived Coloured Or Charged Exotics for Future A Trigger for long-lived coloured or charged exotics for future luminosities in ATLAS Master Thesis by Ursula Søndergaard Supervisor: Rasmus Mackeprang June 2010 Acknowledgements Thank you Rasmus Mackeprang for showing me the wonderful worlds of BSM and SMPs and it’s community, curiosities and fun people. If it were not for you I would not have written this thesis. Thank you (and Peter Hansen) also for giving me the opportunity to experience CERN on site and letting me come along to workshops, and for being a patient supervisor! I wish also to thank Sascha Mehlhase for excellent proof-reading, advice and sharing of experience, thanks to Morten for many good discussions and advice, thanks Esben for many cups of espresso brought to the table, special thanks to Stefania and Jørgen Beck for being very inspirational scientists, thanks to Lotte and Johan and Christian Ohm for great company at CERN, and thanks to the rest of the HEP group at NBI you have all been very nice, also the computing guys. Thanks to my other physics friends Majken, Terese, Karen, Catarina, Troels, Carsten, plus whoever I forget. Last and Biggest thanks to my dear Jacob. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 8 1.1 Introduction.................................... .8 2 Theoretical motivation 12 2.1 TheStandardModel ................................ 12 2.1.1 Overview of the Standard Model . 12 2.1.2 Symmetries................................. 14 2.1.3 Beyond the Standard Model . 15 2.1.4 Theoretical concerns of the Standard Model . 16 2.1.5 Observation of unexplained phenomena . 16 2.2 BeyondtheStandardModelmodels . 17 2.2.1 Stable massive particles in beyond Standard Model scenarios . 19 2.3 Cosmologicalsearches&limits . 19 3Experiment 21 3.1 The Large Hadron Collider . 21 3.2 Hadronic interactions and calorimetry . 24 3.2.1 Nuclearscattering ............................. 24 3.2.2 Hadronic calorimetry . 25 3.3 ATLAS ....................................... 26 3.3.1 Detectorparts ............................... 27 3.3.2 TheInnerDetector............................. 28 3.3.3 The electromagnetic calorimeter . 28 3.3.4 TheTileCalorimeter............................ 30 3.3.5 TheMuonSpectrometer.......................... 32 3.3.6 The Atlas trigger system . 34 3.3.7 Level-1 trigger . 34 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS 3.3.8 TheHigh-LevelTrigger .......................... 38 4 Trigger for Stable Massive Particles 40 4.1 Simulationofexperiments . 40 4.2 StablemassiveparticlesattheLHC . 41 4.2.1 Stable massive particle production . 41 4.2.2 Case Study Specifications . 42 4.2.3 Kinematics . 43 4.2.4 Interactions of heavy exotic hadrons . 46 4.2.5 Interaction of R-hadrons . 47 4.2.6 Samples . 48 4.3 Trigger for long-lived heavy exotics . 50 4.3.1 Event characteristics and R-hadron challenges . 50 4.4 Buildingthetrigger .............................. 52 4.4.1 Level 2 trigger chain for SMPs . 57 4.5 L1triggerresults ................................ 58 4.6 High-leveltriggerresults. 62 4.6.1 RoIresults ................................. 66 4.7 Ratebudget ..................................... 68 4.8 Conclusion ..................................... 77 5Appendix 79 5.0.1 Signalplots................................. 79 5.0.2 Background plots . 98 Bibliography 138 3 List of Figures 2.1 The particles of the Standard Model . 13 2.2 Vacuum polarization diagram . 15 2.3 Running of coupling constants . 17 2.4 Top and stop loop contributions to the Higgs Mass . 18 0 2.5 A gluino decaying to a χ1 through a virtual squark . 19 3.1 The Large Hadron Collider . 21 3.2 Bethe-Bloch..................................... 24 3.3 TheATLASdetector................................ 27 3.4 pseudorapidity .................................. 28 3.5 Sagitta........................................ 29 3.6 The accordion structure of the ATLAS LAr calorimeter . 29 3.7 ATLAS Hadronic Calorimeter . 30 3.8 Schematicviewofatilecalmodule . 31 3.9 Scintillatorelement............................. 31 3.10 Segmentation of modules in tilecal . 32 3.11MuonSpectrometer ............................... 33 3.12 L1 trigger Diagram . 34 3.13 TheATLASMuonTrigger............................ 36 3.14 Calorimeter Trigger . 37 3.15 Trigger sequence diagram . 38 3.16 Trigger Chain . 39 4.1g, ˜ t˜ and ˜b pairproductioncrosssectionw. limits . 43 4.2 β distribution ofg ˜ R-hadrons . 44 4.3 pT distributionofgluinoR-hadrons. 45 4.4 Number of hadronic interactions of R-hadrons in 2m iron . 48 4 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF FIGURES 4.5 Absolute energy loss of SMPs in 1 m of iron . 51 4.6 Average percentage of events with critical β w/o η cut . 54 4.7 TileCal.timeres.vs.energy . 56 4.8 Energydep.inTileCalorimeter . 56 4.9 L1 efficiency for generic gluino 700 GeV . 59 4.10 L1 efficiency for generic gluino 1000 GeV . 59 4.11 L1 efficiency for intermediate gluino 700 GeV . 60 4.12 L1 efficiency for regge STOP 500 GeV . 60 4.13 L1 efficiency for regge sbottom 400 GeV . 61 4.14 L1 efficiency forτ ˜ m=152 GeV . 61 4.15 Tile Calorimeter Time-of-flight of truth-matched candidates . 63 4.16 β dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction . 64 4.17 pT dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction . 65 4.18 Transverse momentum dist. of tt¯ ......................... 66 4.19 Mass dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction . 67 4.20 Relative background efficiencies, L1 XE items (ET ) . 69 ! 4.21 Relative background efficiencies, L1 TAU items . 69 4.22 Relative background efficiencies, L1 MU items . 70 4.23 Run 177540 specification summary. 70 4.24 Run 177540 luminosity. 71 4.25RatesofL1XEitems ............................... 72 4.26RatesofL1TAUitems.............................. 73 4.27RatesofL1MUitems ............................... 74 4.28 Rate of combined L1 TAU6 XE10 items . 75 4.29 L2 efficiencyofthreeL1seeds. 78 5.1 β dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction . 80 5.2 β dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 1000 GeV, generic interaction . 81 5.3 β dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, intermediate interaction . 82 5.4 β dist. of tile candidates for t˜ of 500 GeV, regge interaction . 83 5.5 β dist. of tile candidates for t˜ of 500 GeV, regge interaction . 84 5.6 β dist. of tile candidates forτ ˜ of 152 GeV . 85 5.7 pT dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction . 86 5.8 pT dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 1000 GeV, generic interaction . 87 5.9 pT dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, intermediate interaction . 88 5 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF FIGURES 5.10 pT dist. of tile candidates for t˜ of 500 GeV, regge interaction . 89 5.11 pT dist. of tile candidates for ˜b of 400 GeV, regge interaction . 90 5.12 pT dist. of tile candidates forτ ˜ of 152 GeV . 91 5.13 Mass dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction . 92 5.14 Mass dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 1000 GeV, generic interaction . 93 5.15 Mass dist. of tile candidates forg ˜ of 700 GeV, intermediate interaction . 94 5.16 Mass dist. of tile candidates for t˜ of 500 GeV, regge interaction . 95 5.17 Mass dist. of tile candidates for t˜ of 500 GeV, regge interaction . 96 5.18 Mass dist. of tile candidates forτ ˜ of 152 GeV . 97 5.19 Beta dist. of ttevents¯ ............................... 98 5.20 Betadist.ofQCDdi-jetevents . 99 5.21 Beta dist. of Z ττ ................................ 100 → 5.22 Beta dist. of Z µµ ................................ 101 → 5.23 Beta dist. of W τν ................................. 102 5.24 Transverse momentum dist. of tt¯ events . 103 5.25 Transverse momentum dist. of QCD di-jet events . 104 5.26 Transverse momentum dist. of Z ττ events . 105 → 5.27 Transverse momentum dist. of Z µµ . 106 → 5.28 Transverse momentum dist. of W τν . 107 → 5.29 Mass dist. of tt¯ ................................... 108 5.30 Mass dist. of QCD di-jet events . 109 5.31 Mass dist. of Z ττ ............................... 110 → 5.32 Mass dist. of Z µµ ............................... 111 → 5.33 Mass dist. of W τν ............................... 112 → 5.34 Run rates and prescales of L1 J items . 113 5.35RunratesofL1XEitems ............................ 113 5.36RunratesofL1MUitems............................ 114 5.37RunratesofL1TEitems ............................ 114 5.38RunratesofL1TAUitems ........................... 115 5.39 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1XE20 forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction116 5.40 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1XE20 forg ˜ of 1000 GeV, generic interaction model117 5.41 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1XE20 forg ˜ of 700 GeV, intermediate interaction model118 5.42 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1XE20 for t˜ of 500 GeV, intermediate interaction model119 5.43 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1XE20 for t˜ of 400 GeV, intermediate interaction model120 6 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF FIGURES 5.44 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1XE20 for t˜ of 400 GeV, intermediate interaction model121 5.45 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAU5 forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction122 5.46 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAU5 forg ˜ of 1000 GeV, generic interaction model123 5.47 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAU5 forg ˜ of 700 GeV, intermediate interaction model124 5.48 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAU5 for t˜ of 500 GeV, intermediate interaction model125 5.49 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAU5 for t˜ of 400 GeV, intermediate interaction model126 5.50 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAU5 for t˜ of 400 GeV, intermediate interaction model127 5.51 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAUXE5 forg ˜ of 700 GeV, generic interaction128 5.52 Perfomance of L2 SMP chain with L1TAUXE5 forg ˜ of 1000 GeV, generic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Searching for Stable Massive Particles in the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker
    Searching for Stable Massive Particles in the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker by Steven Schramm A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Bachelor of Science (Hons) in THE FACULTY OF SCIENCE (Physics and Astronomy) The University Of British Columbia (Vancouver) April 2011 c Steven Schramm, 2011 Abstract The search for new particles is an important topic in modern particle physics. New stable massive particles are predicted by various models, including R-parity con- serving variants of supersymmetry. The ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker can be used to look for charged stable massive particles by using the momentum and velocity of particles passing through the detector to calculate its mass. A program named TRTCHAMP has been written to perform this analysis. Recently, ATLAS changed their data retention policies to phase out the use of a particular format of output file created during reconstruction. TRTCHAMP relies on this file type, and therefore this change prevents the algorithm from work- ing in its original state. However, this problem can be resolved by integrating TRTCHAMP into the official reconstruction, which has now been done. This paper documents the changes involved in integrating TRTCHAMP with the existing InDetLowBetaFinder reconstruction package. Topics discussed in- clude the structure of reconstruction algorithms in ATLAS, the retrieval of calibra- tion constants from the detector conditions database, and the parsing of necessary parameters from multiple reconstruction data containers. To conclude, the output of TRTCHAMP is shown to accurately estimate the velocity of protons in mini- mum bias tracks. Additionally, mass plots generated with the TRTCHAMP results are shown to agree with the known mass for both monte carlo and real protons in minimum bias tracks, and agreement is shown between the input and output masses for a monte carlo sample of 300 GeV R-Hadrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Collider Searches for Stable Massive Particles
    Non-collider searches for stable massive particles S. Burdina, M. Fairbairnb, P. Mermodc,, D. Milsteadd, J. Pinfolde, T. Sloanf, W. Taylorg aDepartment of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, UK bDepartment of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK cParticle Physics department, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland dDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden ePhysics Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 0V1 fDepartment of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK gDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3 Abstract The theoretical motivation for exotic stable massive particles (SMPs) and the results of SMP searches at non-collider facilities are reviewed. SMPs are defined such that they would be suffi- ciently long-lived so as to still exist in the cosmos either as Big Bang relics or secondary collision products, and sufficiently massive such that they are typically beyond the reach of any conceiv- able accelerator-based experiment. The discovery of SMPs would address a number of important questions in modern physics, such as the origin and composition of dark matter and the unifi- cation of the fundamental forces. This review outlines the scenarios predicting SMPs and the techniques used at non-collider experiments to look for SMPs in cosmic rays and bound in mat- ter. The limits so far obtained on the fluxes and matter densities of SMPs which possess various detection-relevant properties such as electric and magnetic charge are given. Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Theory and cosmology of various kinds of SMPs 4 2.1 New particle states (elementary or composite) .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1802.10184V1 [Hep-Ph] 26 Feb 2018 Charged Particles Experimentum Crucis for Dark Atoms of Composite Dark Matter
    March 1, 2018 1:20 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE New_physics International Journal of Modern Physics D c World Scientific Publishing Company Probes for Dark Matter Physics Maxim Yu. Khlopov National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia APC laboratory 10, rue Alice Domon et Leonie Duquet 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France [email protected] Received Day Month Year Revised Day Month Year The existence of cosmological dark matter is in the bedrock of the modern cosmology. The dark matter is assumed to be nonbaryonic and to consist of new stable particles. Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) miracle appeals to search for neutral stable weakly interacting particles in underground experiments by their nuclear recoil and at colliders by missing energy and momentum, which they carry out. However the lack of WIMP effects in their direct underground searches and at colliders can appeal to other forms of dark matter candidates. These candidates may be weakly interacting slim parti- cles, superweakly interacting particles, or composite dark matter, in which new particles are bound. Their existence should lead to cosmological effects that can find probes in the astrophysical data. However if composite dark matter contains stable electrically charged leptons and quarks bound by ordinary Coulomb interaction in elusive dark atoms, these charged constituents of dark atoms can be the subject of direct experimental test at the colliders. The models, predicting stable particles with charge -2 without stable parti- cles with charges +1 and -1 can avoid severe constraints on anomalous isotopes of light elements and provide solution for the puzzles of dark matter searches.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmological Reflection of Particle Symmetry
    S S symmetry Review Cosmological Reflection of Particle Symmetry Maxim Khlopov 1,2 1 Laboratory of Astroparticle Physics and Cosmology 10, rue Alice Domon et Léonie Duquet, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France; [email protected] 2 Center for Cosmopartcile Physics “Cosmion” and National Research Nuclear University “MEPHI” (Moscow State Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, Moscow 115409, Russia Academic Editor: Sergei D. Odintsov Received: 31 May 2016; Accepted: 10 August 2016; Published: 20 August 2016 Abstract: The standard model involves particle symmetry and the mechanism of its breaking. Modern cosmology is based on inflationary models with baryosynthesis and dark matter/energy, which involves physics beyond the standard model. Studies of the physical basis of modern cosmology combine direct searches for new physics at accelerators with its indirect non-accelerator probes, in which cosmological consequences of particle models play an important role. The cosmological reflection of particle symmetry and the mechanisms of its breaking are the subject of the present review. Keywords: elementary particles; dark matter; early universe; symmetry breaking 1. Introduction The laws of known particle interactions and transformations are based on the gauge symmetry-extension of the gauge principle of quantum electrodynamics to strong and weak interactions. Starting from isotopic invariance of nuclear forces, treating proton and neutron as different states of one particle-nucleon; the development of this approach led to the successful
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Charged Massive Supersymmetric Particles at the LHC
    The Search for Charged Massive Supersymmetric Particles at the LHC Aleksey Pavlov A Senior Project Presented to Cal Poly June 5, 2012 This material is based upon work supported by The National Science Foundation under grant number 0969966. 1 Contents 1 Abstract 3 2 Introduction 3 3 Supersymmetry: An Extension of the Standard Model 5 4 CHAMPs 8 5 The LHC 9 6 The ALICE Detector 12 7 Analysis 14 8 Results 17 2 1 Abstract Charged Massive Particles (CHAMPs) are predicted in the Supersymmetry (SUSY) extension of the Standard Model though they have never been ob- served. We look for CHAMPs in the ALICE Detector at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. While the main purpose of ALICE is to study Quark- Gluon Plasma, we take advantage of the tracking and time of flight capabil- ities of several sub-detectors in ALICE to look for signs of CHAMPs. These elusive particles are characterized by their slow velocity, high transverse mo- mentum and therefore heavy mass. Our research found a small handful of candidates among a large sample size but more work is required to confirm their identity and exclude the possibility that they have been misidentified. 2 Introduction The Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM) is the modern theory describ- ing how fundamental particles interact and behave. It was developed in the second half of the 20th Century after physicist Sheldon Glashow found a way to combine, or unify, the electromagnetic and electroweak forces [7]. In 1973 Glashow's electroweak theory was experimentally confirmed at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research in Geneva, Switzerland, when nuetral currents through the weak nuclear force were measured.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS Document
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) Submitted to: Phys. Rev. D. CERN-EP-2016-063 8th July 2016 Search for metastable heavy chargedp particles with large ionization energy loss in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS experiment The ATLAS Collaboration Abstract This paperp presents a search for massive charged long-lived particles produced in pp colli- sions at s = 13 TeV at the LHC using the ATLAS experiment. The dataset used corres- ponds to an integrated luminosity of 3:2 fb−1. Many extensions of the Standard Model pre- dict the existence of massive charged long-lived particles, such as R-hadrons. These massive particles are expected to be produced with a velocity significantly below the speed of light, and therefore to have a specific ionization higher than any Standard Model particle of unit charge at high momenta. The Pixel subsystem of the ATLAS detector is used to measure the ionization energy loss of reconstructed charged particles and to search for such highly ion- izing particles. The search presented here hasp much greater sensitivity than a similar search performed using the ATLAS detector in the s = 8 TeV dataset, thanks to the increase in expected signal cross-section due to the higher center-of-mass energy of collisions, to an upgraded detector with a new silicon layer close to the interaction point, and to analysis improvements. No significant deviation from Standard Model background expectations is observed, and lifetime-dependent upper limits on R-hadron production cross-sections and arXiv:1604.04520v1 [hep-ex] 15 Apr 2016 masses are set.
    [Show full text]
  • Searches for Long-Lived Charged Particles in Pp Collisions At
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP/2013-073 2013/07/30 CMS-EXO-12-026 Searches for long-livedp charged particles in pp collisions at s =7 and 8 TeV The CMS Collaboration∗ Abstract Resultsp of searches for heavy stable charged particles produced in pp collisions at s = 7 and 8 TeV are presented corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.0 fb−1 and 18.8 fb−1, respectively. Data collected with the CMS detector are used to study the momentum, energy deposition, and time-of-flight of signal candidates. Leptons with an electric charge between e/3 and 8e, as well as bound states that can undergo charge exchange with the detector material, are studied. Analysis results are presented for various combinations of signatures in the inner tracker only, inner tracker and muon detector, and muon detector only. Detector signatures utilized are long time-of-flight to the outer muon system and anomalously high (or low) energy deposition in the inner tracker. The data are consistent with the expected background, and upper limits are set on the production cross section of long-lived gluinos, scalar top quarks, and scalar t leptons, as well as pair produced long-lived leptons. Corresponding lower mass limits, ranging up to 1322 GeV/c2 for gluinos, are the most stringent to date. arXiv:1305.0491v2 [hep-ex] 29 Jul 2013 Published in the Journal of High Energy Physics as doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)122. c 2013 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration. CC-BY-3.0 license ∗See Appendix A for the list of collaboration members 1 1 Introduction Many extensions of the standard model (SM) include heavy, long-lived, charged particles that have speed v significantly less than the speed of light c [1–3] or charge Q not equal to the elementary positive or negative charge ±1e [4–8], or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv: Search for Double Charged Particles As Direct Test for Dark
    Search for Double Charged Particles as Direct Test for Dark Atom Constituents O. V. Bulekov1, M. Yu. Khlopov1;2;3, A. S. Romaniouk1;4, Yu. S. Smirnov1 1National Research Nuclear University "MEPHI" (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia 2 Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics \Cosmion" 115409 Moscow, Russia 3 APC laboratory 10, rue Alice Domon et L´eonieDuquet 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France 4 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract The nonbaryonic dark matter of the Universe is assumed to con- sist of new stable particles. Stable particle candidates for cosmological dark matter are usually considered as neutral and weakly interacting. However stable charged leptons and quarks can also exist hidden in elusive dark atoms and can play a role of dark matter. Such possi- bility is strongly restricted by the constraints on anomalous isotopes of light elements that form positively charged heavy species with or- dinary electrons. This problem might be avoided, if stable particles with charge -2 exist and there are no stable particles with charges +1 and -1. These conditions cannot be realized in supersymmetric models, but can be satisfied in several alternative scenarios, which are discussed in this paper. The excessive -2 charged particles are arXiv:1711.10773v1 [hep-ph] 29 Nov 2017 bound with primordial helium in O-helium atoms, maintaining spe- cific nuclear-interacting form of the dark matter. O-helium dark mat- ter can provide solution for the puzzles of dark matter searches. The successful development of composite dark matter scenarios appeals to experimental search for doubly charged constituents of dark atoms. Estimates of production cross section of such particles at LHC are presented and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Searches for Magnetic Monopoles and Others Stable Massive Particles
    Searches for magnetic monopoles and others stable massive particles Maurizio Spurio1,2 1 INFN - Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti-Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy 2Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell'Universit`a,Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy June 6, 2019 Abstract The Standard Model (SM) of the microcosm provides an excellent de- scription of the phenomena of the microcosm, with the triumph of the discovery of the Higgs boson. There are many reasons, however, to be- lieve that the SM is incomplete and represents a valid theory at relatively low energies only. Of particular interest are the models based on complete symmetries, such as those attempting a true unification between leptons and quarks in terms of a single symmetry group (Grand Unified Theories, GUTs) and those attempting unification between fermions and bosons, such as the supersymmetry. This chapter is devoted to the description of stable and massive particles not predicted within the SM, their energy loss mechanisms and their searches in the cosmic radiation. The stabil- ity of these particles means that if they were produced at any time in the thermal history of the Universe, they would still be present as relic particles. Examples of stable massive particles discussed in this chapter include magnetic monopoles, strange quark matter and supersymmetric particles. In particular, we focus on the status of searches for magnetic monopoles (also inducing proton-decay processes), nuclearites and Q-balls in neutrino telescopes.1 arXiv:1906.02039v1 [hep-ph] 5 Jun 2019 1 Introduction This chapter is devoted to the description of stable massive particles not pre- dicted within the Standard Model, and their searches in the cosmic radiation, in particular in neutrino telescopes.
    [Show full text]
  • What Comes Beyond the Standard Models Bled, July 9–17, 2017
    i i “proc17” — 2017/12/11 — 19:44 — page I — #1 i i BLEJSKE DELAVNICE IZ FIZIKE LETNIK 18, STˇ . 2 BLED WORKSHOPS IN PHYSICS VOL. 18, NO. 2 ISSN 1580-4992 Proceedings to the 20th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models Bled, July 9–17, 2017 Edited by Norma Susana MankoˇcBorˇstnik Holger Bech Nielsen Dragan Lukman DMFA – ZALOZNIˇ STVOˇ LJUBLJANA, DECEMBER 2017 i i i i i i “proc17” — 2017/12/11 — 19:44 — page II — #2 i i The 20th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models, 9.– 17. July 2017, Bled was organized by Society of Mathematicians, Physicists and Astronomers of Slovenia and sponsored by Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana Society of Mathematicians, Physicists and Astronomers of Slovenia Beyond Semiconductor (MatjaˇzBreskvar) Scientific Committee John Ellis, CERN Roman Jackiw, MIT Masao Ninomiya, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University and Mathematical Institute, Osaka-city University Organizing Committee Norma Susana MankoˇcBorˇstnik Holger Bech Nielsen Maxim Yu. Khlopov The Members of the Organizing Committee of the International Workshop “What Comes Beyond the Standard Models”, Bled, Slovenia, state that the articles published in the Proceedings to the 20th Workshop “What Comes Beyond the Standard Models”, Bled, Slovenia are refereed at the Workshop in intense in-depth discussions. i i i i i i “proc17” — 2017/12/11 — 19:44 — page III — #3 i i Workshops organized at Bled . What Comes Beyond the Standard Models (June 29–July 9, 1998), Vol. 0 (1999) No. 1 (July 22–31, 1999) (July 17–31, 2000) (July 16–28, 2001), Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter, Mass Scales Sequence, and Superstructure in the Universe (With Extension and Summary)
    Dark Matter, Mass Scales Sequence, and Superstructure in the Universe (with extension and summary) Wuliang Huang Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 918(3), Beijing 100049, China Xiaodong Huang Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A. Abstract The original intention of the first version of this paper is to search for the mass rang of dark matter particles (fermions or bosons) md according to the material state equations in 1 the evolved universe. It shows the mass rang of md is around 10 eV , i.e. into H- decoupling area. The dark matter particles with low (light) mass are related to the superstructure and belong to a mass scale sequence in the universe. The cosmic structure is not only from primary perturbation of early universe but also from perturbation and Jeans density wave of dark matter in the superstructure. The environment inside superstructure (SS) speed up the formation of sub-structure in SS by H-decoupling period. If dark matter is dominated by bosons, the cosmology principle is needed; if dark matter is dominated by fermions, it tends to spherical universe (finite universe). The second section (extension section) of this paper describes the extension of the mass scales sequence (mass tree) and describes new particles (u -particle, Planck particle, A -particle, -particle, graviton, -particle, heavy electron…). This can be used to explore the state of matter with super-high density, inflation, lightest black hole (LBH), BSM, CGB etc. in the early universe. Measuring the rate of change of c and at the present time is one way to check whether the cosmological constant/dark energy exists or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation on 1/29/2013
    PRISMA Cluster of Excellence Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter A Comprehensive Approach to Physics Beyond the Standard Model www.prisma.uni-mainz.de 23 | Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter – PRISMA UCNs at Atom & Ion BES-III, NA62 ATLAS MESA, MAMI IceCube TRIGA Traps PANDA XENON Energy 10-23 eV 1 MeV 1 GeV 1 TeV 1011 TeV Symmetry Tests Hadronic Properties New Particle Searches Particle New Forces Dark Sector Flavor Sector, Dark Matter Astrophysics 24 | Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter – PRISMA ATLAS, COMPASS, GSI, FAIR XENON DØ / FNAL NA62 / CERN BaBar / SLAC BES-III / IHEP IceCube 25 | Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter – PRISMA PRISMA Structural Initiatives MESA Mainz Energy-recovering 10 million € + salaries Superconduting Accelerator (MESA) and Experimental Facility Mainz Institute for Theoretical PRISMA Physics (MITP) Structural Initiatives TRIGA MITP TRIGA International User Facility 1 million € 2 million € + salaries + salaries 26 | Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter – PRISMA Three key projects 27 | Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter – PRISMA Highlight: Weak mixing angle at high and low energies 2 The weak mixing angle sin θW is the key parameter describing how the electroweak gauge symmetry is broken to the U(1) of electromagnetism: It governs the ratios of gauge couplings and gauge-boson masses: Quantum corrections to these relations are sensitive to the masses of the top quark and Higgs boson, and to new particles 28 | Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions and Structure of Matter – PRISMA Highlight: Weak mixing angle at high and low energies 2 Precision measurements of sin θW on the Z-pole have led to two discrepant values: a legacy of an era ! Statistical fluctuations or hints of new physics (possibly different contri- butions to different observables, ALR vs.
    [Show full text]