DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Context

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Context Cultural Resources Assessment for the Grays Harbor Rail Terminal, LLC Proposed Liquid Bulk Facility, Hoquiam, Grays Harbor County, Washington Contains Confidential Information—Not for Public Distribution Prepared by: Jennifer Chambers, M.S. With contributions by: Melanie Diedrich, M.A., RPA Revised by: Katherine M. Kelly, MES, RPA Tierra Archaeological Report No. 2013-080 March 11, 2014 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Grays Harbor Rail Terminal, LLC Proposed Liquid Bulk Facility, Hoquiam, Grays Harbor County, Washington Contains Confidential Information—Not for Public Distribution Prepared by: Jennifer Chambers, M.S. With contributions by: Melanie Diedrich, M.A., RPA Revised by: Katherine M. Kelly, MES, RPA Prepared for: Karissa Kawamoto HDR, Inc. 500 108th Ave NE, Suite 1200 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Submitted by: Tierra Right of Way Services, Ltd. 2611 NE 125th Street, Suite 202 Seattle, Washington 98125 Tierra Archaeological Report No. 2013-080 March 11, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Project Information ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Regulatory Context ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Background Review ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Environmental Context ................................................................................................................................ 6 Cultural Context ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Previous Cultural Resources Studies and Sites ........................................................................................ 12 Historic Properties Expectations ................................................................................................................... 13 Former Tidelands ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Upland Terraces ........................................................................................................................................... 14 Field InvestigationS ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Results and Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 26 References ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Detail of the Hoquiam, WA (1994), 7.5-minute quadrangle map showing the APE. ............ 2 Figure 2. Proposed project plan map showing project components. ........................................................ 3 Figure 3. Proposed project plan map showing subsurface test unit locations. ......................................... 4 Figure 4. The GLO survey map locates the project within tidelands (USSG 1893). ............................... 8 Figure 5. An 1889 (U.S. Fish Commission 1891) fisheries map shows that the project is in an area once known for resources such as soft clams (probably Mya arenaria). ....................................... 9 Figure 6. 1953 USGS aerial survey with APE overlay (EarthExplorer 2014a). ........................................ 9 Figure 7. 1971 NASA vertical reconnaissance aerial photography (EarthExplorer 2014b). ................ 10 Figure 8. Results of a search of WISAARD for nearby cultural resource surveys and recorded archaeological sites. ................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 9. Map from USACE survey of potential dredge disposal area C (Munsell 1976). ................... 11 LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1. Overview of boring set up, view to the south. ............................................................................ 15 Photo 2. Overview of trench excavation, view to the north. .................................................................... 16 Photo 3. Example of subsurface deposits encountered throughout the APE, view southwest. ......... 16 Photo 4. Example of surface gravels encountered throughout the APE. ............................................... 17 Photo 5. Fill deposits consisting of clay with organics (right) over silty sand (left). .............................. 17 Photo 6. Representative photo of native interbedded sand deposits. ...................................................... 17 Photo 7. Example of man-made fabric material encountered below fill in much of the APE. ........... 18 Photo 8. Fibrous material prior to screening (left); macro shot after screening (middle); under 10x magnification of man-made felted material fibers (right). ............................................................ 18 Photo 9. Overview of northern portion of project APE. View to the northeast. .................................. 19 Photo 10. APE overview, from the southeast corner to the northwest corner. .................................... 21 Photo 11. APE overview, from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. .................................... 21 Photo 12. Eastern shed, exterior north side, view to southeast. ............................................................... 22 Photo 13. Western shed exterior north side, view to the southeast. ........................................................ 22 Photo 14. Weigh station and scales, exterior, north side, view to the southwest. .................................. 23 Photo 15. Overview of wharf, view to the southeast. ................................................................................ 23 Photo 16. Overview of STP, terminated at 2.1 m (7.0 feet). ..................................................................... 24 Tierra Archaeological Report No. 2013-080 ii Photo 17. View east along extended portion of APE. ............................................................................... 25 Photo 18. Overview of project area, view to the west. .............................................................................. 25 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Subsurface Testing Samples .................................................................................................. A.1 Appendix B. Sample Protocol for Discovery of Archaeological Resources ......................................... B.1 Tierra Archaeological Report No. 2013-080 iii INTRODUCTION On behalf of US Development Group LLC (USD), Tierra Right of Way Services, Ltd. (Tierra), was contracted by HDR, Inc. (HDR), to conduct a cultural resources assessment for USD’s proposed Liquid Bulk Facility Project (the project). The project, located in Section 10, Township 17 North, Range 10 West, Willamette Meridian (WM), proposes to develop a new crude oil storage facility at the Port of Grays Harbor Terminal 3 (T3) property located between State Route 109 (SR 109) and Grays Harbor in Hoquiam, Washington (Figures 1–3). This report has been prepared to assess the effects of the project on cultural resources in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), as amended. PROJECT INFORMATION Terminal 3 (T3) at the Port of Grays Harbor (the Port) is 150 acres in size and includes an existing 183-m-long (600-foot-long) concrete shipping terminal. Approximately 25 acres of the T3 site are currently leased by the Port to a private tenant (Willis Enterprises), which utilizes the property for storing and sorting logs and operating a wood chipping and processing facility. The remaining area of the property (a former mill site) is occupied by two metal buildings and a rail spur line, but it is otherwise currently vacant. The liquid bulk materials would be delivered to the proposed facility via unit trains in fully contained liquid bulk rail cars, unloaded into on-site storage tanks, and then loaded onto barges or other marine vessels for delivery to refineries. A unit train consists of approximately 60–120 rail cars, each car with a capacity of 680–720 barrels, providing a total shipment volume of 41,000–87,000 barrels per unit train. The facility infrastructure and operations would be designed to receive and off-load a maximum of one full unit train every other day. The general layout of the proposed rail and off-loading facilities includes four 20-car yard tracks and two 20-car off-loading tracks (120 rail cars total). In addition, a “run-around” track would be used to reposition the locomotive engines and to hold cars awaiting maintenance. The off-loading spots would be equipped with permanent rack access structures, each of which would support connections for a maximum of 40 rail cars (20 spots on each side of a rack). The off-loading spots and central header would be located within a secondary containment. The rack structures consist of elevated steel walkways with extendable access platforms used to access the tops of the rail cars. Off-loading would occur via 10-cm (4-inch) dry break connections, hoses, valves,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roadmap to a Climate Action Plan Port of Bellingham
    Roadmap to a Climate Action Plan Port of Bellingham Photo by Garrett Parker on Unsplash December 31, 2019 1801 Roeder Avenue 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 615 Bellingham, WA 98225 Seattle, WA 98101 360-676-2500 206-823-3060 For over 40 years ECONorthwest has helped its clients make sound decisions based on rigorous economic, planning, and financial analysis. For more information about ECONorthwest: www.econw.com. ECONorthwest prepared this Roadmap to a Climate Action Plan for the Port of Bellingham. It received substantial assistance from the Port of Bellingham staff, including Adrienne Hegedus and Brian Gouran, among others. Other firms, agencies, and staff contributed to other research that this report relied on. That assistance notwithstanding, ECONorthwest is responsible for the content of this report. The staff at ECONorthwest prepared this report based on their general knowledge of urban, transportation, and natural resource planning, and on information derived from government agencies, private statistical services, the reports of others, interviews of individuals, or other sources believed to be reliable. ECONorthwest has not independently verified the accuracy of all such information and makes no representation regarding its accuracy or completeness. Any statements nonfactual in nature constitute the authors’ current opinions, which may change as more information becomes available. ECONorthwest staff who contributed to this report include Adam Domanski, Jennifer Cannon, Annalise Helm, and Sarah Reich. For more information about this report contact: Adam Domanski, Ph.D. [email protected] 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 615 Seattle, WA 98101 206-823-3060 ECONorthwest | Portland | Seattle | Los Angeles | Eugene | Boise | econw.com ii Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ports in Washington State
    PORTS IN WASHINGTON STATE New Market Industrial Campus and Tumwater Town Center Real Estate Development Master Plan Public Meeting #1 March 5, 2015 Founded in 2005, Community Attributes Inc. (CAI) tells data-rich stories about communities that are important to decision makers. Regional economics Land use economics Land use planning and urban design Community and economic development Surveys, market research and evaluation Data analysis and business intelligence Information design www.communityattributes.com 2 Contents 1. Ports in Washington State 2. A Port’s Purpose 3. Economic Impacts www.communityattributes.com 3 1. Ports in Washington State www.communityattributes.com 4 Ports in Washington State 75 Port districts in Washington State located in 33 of the 39 counties in Washington Port of Allyn (Mason County) Port of Grays Harbor (Grays Harbor County) Port of Poulsbo (Kitsap County) Port of Anacortes (Skagit County) Port of Hartline (Grant County) Port of Quincy (Grant County) Port of Bellingham (Whatcom County) Port of Hoodsport (Mason County) Port of Ridgefield (Clark County) Port of Benton (Benton County) Port of Illahee (Kitsap County) Port of Royal Slope (Grant County) Port of Bremerton (Kitsap County) Port of Ilwaco (Pacific County) Port of Seattle (King County) Port of Brownsville (Kitsap County) Port of Indianola (Kitsap County) Port of Shelton (Mason County) Port of Camas-Washougal (Clark County) Port of Kahlotus (Franklin County) Port of Silverdale (Kitsap County) Port of Centralia (Lewis County) Port of Kalama (Cowlitz
    [Show full text]
  • Ninth Amendment to Fmc Agreement No. 009335 the Marine Terminal Discussion Agreement and Cooperative Working Agreement for the N
    NINTH AMENDMENT TO FMC AGREEMENT NO. 009335 THE MARINE TERMINAL DISCUSSION AGREEMENT AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT FOR THE NORTHWEST MARINE TERMINAL ASSOCIATION THIS NINTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of .~ ~ 7 , 2016, to FMC Agreement No. 009335, the Marine Terminal Discussion Agreement and Cooperative Working Agreement for the Northwest Marine Terminal Association ("Agreement"). WHEREAS, Article ?(a) of the Agreement states that "Any public or private terminal operator serving interstate and foreign commerce and located within the States of Oregon or Washington shall be eligible to become a Member of this Agreement, upon consent of the majority of the membership, by affixing its signature thereto; and WHEREAS, the Northwest Seaport Alliance ("Alliance") has applied for membership and the Northwest Marine Terminal Association ("NWMTA") fTl e~mbers voted and approved in accordance with the applicable procedures on 4 l£ ,2016, to have the Alliance join the NWMTA; and WHEREAS, Article ?(d) of the Agreement states that "Prompt notice of admission to membership shall be furnished to the Federal Maritime Commission and such admission shall be effective upon the filing of a modification with the Commission"; and WHEREAS, the Port ofTacoma, a member of the NWMT A, has transferred management of its cargo terminals to the Alliance and will have its interests represented adequately by the Alliance and therefore desires to relinquish its membership in the NWMTA; NOW THEREFORE, 1 . The Northwest Seaport Alliance is approved as a new member of NWMTA. A revised Page 20 and 21 is added to Agreement No. 009335-009 showing the Northwest Seaport Alliance as a member of the NWMTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Port of Seattle
    Port of Edmonds Port of Seattle 336 Admiral Way PO Box 1209 Edmonds, WA 98020 Seattle, WA 98111 Port of Everett Port of Anacortes PO Box 538 PO Box 297 Everett, WA 98206 Anacortes, WA 98221 Port of Bellingham Port of Skagit PO Box 1677 PO Box 348 Bellingham, WA 98227 Burlington, WA 98233 Port of Coupeville Port of Orcas P O Box 577 PO Box 53 Coupeville, WA 98239 Eastsound, WA 98245 Port of South Whidbey Island Port of Friday Harbor Box 872 PO Box 889 Freeland, WA 98249 Friday Harbor, WA 98250 Port of Brownsville Port of Kingston 9790 Ogle Road NE PO Box 559 Bremerton, WA 98310 Kingston, WA 98346 Port of Kingston Port of Manchester PO Box 559 PO Box 304 Kingston, WA 98346 Manchester, WA 98353 Port of Port Angeles Port of Bremerton PO Box 1350 8850 SW State Highway 3 Port Angeles, WA 98362 Port Orchard, WA 98367 Port of Port Townsend Port of Poulsbo PO Box 1180 PO Box 732 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Poulsbo, WA 98370 Port of Silverdale Port of Tacoma PO Box 310 PO Box 1837 Silverdale, WA 98383 Tacoma, WA 98401 Port of Olympia Port of Grays Harbor 915 Washington Street NE PO Box 660 Olympia, WA 98501 Aberdeen, WA 98520 Port of Allyn Port of Centralia PO Box 1 3508 Galvin Road Allyn, WA 98524 Centralia, WA 98531 Port of Chehalis Port of Hoodsport 321 Maurin Road PO Box 429 Chehalis, WA 98532 Hoodsport, WA 98548 Port of Willapa Harbor Port of Shelton 1725 Ocean Avenue West 21 Sanderson Way Raymond, WA 98577 Shelton, WA 98584 Port of Klickitat Port of Wahkiakum County 1 154 E Bingen Point Way #A 500 2nd Street Bingen, WA 98605 Cathlamet, WA 98612
    [Show full text]
  • America's Seaports Endorse Approval of Trans-Pacific Partnership
    America’s Seaports Endorse Approval of Trans-Pacific Partnership The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), the unified voice of America’s seaports, endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement between the United States and its trading partners in the Pacific. AAPA has long supported trade policies based on equity and fairness. The prosperity of the U.S. is inextricably entwined with that of the rest of the world. We believe this agreement, and others pending, will increase trade and U.S. exports. This increase in trade will provide more jobs in our ports and better wages for our workers. America’s seaports deliver vital goods, ship U.S. exports, create jobs, and support local and national economic growth. Cargo activity at U.S. ports currently accounts for over a quarter of the U.S. economy and $650 billion in personal income, supports the employment of over 23 million American workers, and generates over $320 billion in local, state and federal tax revenues. These enormous impacts will increase further due to the trade growth anticipated as a result of the TPP agreement. For every additional $1 billion in exports shipped through U.S. seaports, 15,000 U.S. jobs are created. Jobs in export-intensive industries pay up to 18 percent more, on average, than jobs in other industries. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is good for American ports and American jobs. AAPA and the following U.S. member ports strongly endorse quick approval of TPP. Alabama State Port Authority Port of Longview American Association of Port Authorities
    [Show full text]
  • Grays Harbor, Washington, Navigation Improvement Project, Feasibility
    ______________________________________________________________________ Grays Harbor, Washington Navigation Improvement Project General Investigation Feasibility Study FINAL Limited Reevaluation Report Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District June 2014 Grays Harbor, Washington, Navigation Improvement Project Feasibility Study Final Limited Reevaluation Report June 2014 Executive Summary This Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR) and attached appendices document the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) reevaluation of the economic justification of authorized depths and potential environmental impacts of deepening the federal deep-draft navigation channel in Grays Harbor, Washington from the currently maintained depth of -36 feet mean lower low water (MLLW) to the full legislatively authorized project depth of -38 feet MLLW. Congress authorized the Grays Harbor, Washington, Navigation Improvement Project (NIP) in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662. This reevaluation focused on two alternatives that would deepen approximately 14.5 miles of the 27.5-mile federal navigation channel, along with a No Action alternative. Channel deepening would occur from the South Reach upstream to Cow Point Reach adjacent to the Port of Grays Harbor Terminal 4. The recommended plan, based on the economic and environmental analyses conducted for this reevaluation, is Alternative 3: Deepen Channel to -38 feet MLLW. Alternative 3 maximizes net benefits (average annual benefits less average annual cost) and is the plan that maximizes net benefits for National Economic Development (NED). This is the federal recommended plan. The depth in the recommended plan is the original legislatively authorized project depth and no additional congressional authorization would be required to implement the recommended pan.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Public Ports Economic Impact and Jobs Analysis
    Washington State Public Ports Economic Impact and Jobs Analysis March 2017 Community Attributes tells data rich stories about communities that are important to decision-makers. President and CEO: Chris Mefford Project Manager: Spencer Cohen, PhD Lead Analyst: Sudarshan Sampath Analysts: Madalina Calen Radhika Nair Carrie Schaden Alexandra Streamer Eric Viola Design: Maeve Edstrom Community Attributes Inc. 1411 Fourth Ave, Suite 1401 Seattle, Washington 98101 www.communityattributes.com Washington State Public Ports Economic Impact and Jobs Analysis March 2, 2017 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Airports & Commercial Aviation Washington’s public ports are economic engines, helping In 2015, 16,280 direct jobs were located at Washington’s facilitate commerce, supporting local and regional economic 26 port district airports. These jobs were in fields such as air development, and providing public goods like marinas and parks. transportation services, air cargo, support services, retail, This study, on behalf of the Washington Public Ports Association, and aerospace manufacturers that rely on access to airfields. examines various impacts of Washington’s public ports system on Statewide, airports and commercial aviation activities supported the state economy. a total economic impact of 43,700 jobs. Economic impacts describe both the direct activities of port Airports are critical infrastructure for the state economy, enabling employers and facility users and the broader impacts supported the movement of people and goods. An estimated 38.5 million through business-to-business transactions and worker income passengers passed through Washington’s port district airports in expenditures throughout the economy. Jobs is a leading measure 2015, including 2.5 million international passengers. In addition, of these impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Washington State MARINE PORTS and NAVIGATION PLAN 2017 WASHINGTON STATE MARINE PORTS and NAVIGATION PLAN
    2017 Washington State MARINE PORTS and NAVIGATION PLAN 2017 WASHINGTON STATE MARINE PORTS AND NAVIGATION PLAN CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 THE MARINE FREIGHT SYSTEM...............................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER 3 THE MARINE FREIGHT FORECAST .........................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER 4 MARINE SYSTEM PARTNERS ....................................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 5 FUNDING ......................................................................................................................................................................14 CHAPTER 6 OUTREACH AND SURVEY .......................................................................................................................................17 CHAPTER 7 ECONOMIC VITALITY ................................................................................................................................................19 CHAPTER 8 PRESERVATION .......................................................................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 9 SAFETY ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Manifest
    WASHINGTON PUBLIC PORTS ASSOCIATION THE MANIFEST SPOTLIGHT IN SEASON: OPENING DATES & DETAILS FOR PORT FARMER’S MARKETS GARY NELSON ELECTED AAPA CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Welcoming warmer weather in Washington means our communities are itching to get outside and enjoy the northwest’s bounty of local produce. Below, six ports that host markets or work with their communities to bring farmers’ markets to fruition: The PORT OF KINGSTON has featured the Kingston Farmers Market for 30 years. The market operates at Marina Park next to Kingston Marina, each Saturday, from May 5 - October 26, 2019 from 9:30a- 2:30p. Under a conditional use agreement with the Port, the market features fresh, local fruits and vegetables, local artisanal hand-made art & crafts and more. Earlier this month, Port of Grays Harbor The PORT OF VANCOUVER provides the venue and assistance for the monthly Terminal 1 Night Executive Director Gary Nelson was Market. A family-friendly, monthly marketplace, the Night Market celebrates local businesses, unanimously elected to serve as highlights the regional talent and brings the community together. Featuring 85+ vendors, live the American Association of Port music, entertainment, food/drinks and more, the Night Market is free and open to all ages. Authorities (AAPA) Chairman of the Board for 2019-20. At the PORT OF ANACORTES, the Anacortes Farmers’ Market operates near the Port’s Cap Sante Marina, outdoors each Saturday from 9am-2pm from May 4 through October 26, and AAPA is the unified and recognized indoors each second Saturday from 9 am-2pm from January 12 through April 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Link Between Washington’S Rail Network and Its Marine Terminal Assets
    Community Attributes Inc. tells data-rich stories about communities that are important to decision makers. President & CEO Chris Mefford Project Manager Spencer Cohen, PhD Analysts Madalina Calen Robert Douglas Maeve Edstrom Maureen McLennon Carrie Schaden Sean Volke Community Attributes Inc. 500 Union Street, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98101 www.communityattributes.com This page was intentionally left blank C ONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose ............................................................................................. 1 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 1 Outline of Report ......................................................................................................... 2 Overview of Global Trade and Supply Chain Management ............................................. 3 Definition of Global Trade and Supply Chain Management Sector .............................. 3 Infrastructure Assets ................................................................................................... 6 Workforce System .......................................................................................................... 12 Origin and Destination Markets and Cargo Handling ................................................... 15 Direct Activities ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL WCIT Research: the Washington Port System: Gateways
    The Washington Port System: Gateways to Growth at Home and Opportunities Abroad May 2021 wcit.org @washingtontrade facebook.com/ washingtontrade Introduction Background and Purpose The importance of trade to Washington state is undisputed. With approximately 40 percent of all jobs tied to international commerce, Washington is the most trade-reliant state in the nation1. Geographic advantages including proximity to the Pacific Ocean, natural deep water harbors courtesy of the Puget Sound and an unparalleled network of roads, railways, and waterways have made the region a gateway for trade and commerce. Essential to the region’s preeminent role as an engine of international trade and economic growth is the extensive system of ports that serve communities throughout the state. Washington’s public ports system is publicly owned and operates 75 distinct port districts across 33 of the 39 counties in the state. The state has more separate ports than any other state, with some quite small in area and population.2 The public ports system includes seaports and airports and provides critical infrastructure that drives economic development across the state. This paper focuses on the importance of Washington’s ports to the statewide economy. These ports constitute important economic activity assets by facilitating trade, the movement of passengers, tourism, supply chains, and industrial activities. Overview of the Port Districts System in Washington Ports play a crucial role for Washington’s economic competitiveness, by ensuring the safe and efficient movement of goods. Washington’s wide-ranging marine terminal system, shown in Exhibit 1, displays the breadth of marine cargo ports located not only on the Pacific Coast, but throughout the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Real Estate Workshop 9/18/2018 - 9/18/2018 Seattle, WA
    Port Real Estate Workshop 9/18/2018 - 9/18/2018 Seattle, WA Terrie Battuello CEcD Shant Boyajian Chief of Business & Economic Development Associate Port of Everett Nossaman, LLP PO Box 538 1666 K Street NW, Suite 500 Everett, WA 98206-0538 Washington, DC 20006 tel: (425) 259-3164 tel: (202) 887-1400 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Kevin Beardsley Debbie Calli Chief Financial Officer Properties Manager Duluth Seaway Port Authority Port of Stockton 2305 W. Superior Street PO Box 2089 Duluth, MN 55806-1931 Stockton, CA 95201-2089 tel: (218) 727-8525 tel: (209) 946-0246 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Jeffrey Bishop Daniel Campbell Executive Director Vice President, Govt Services Port of Moses Lake Yardi Systems, Inc. 7810 Andrews St. NE, #200 430 S. Fairview Avenue Moses Lake, WA 98837 Santa Barbara, CA 93117 tel: (509) 762-5363 tel: (805) 699-2040 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Andrée Blais Esq. Scott Carter Partner Managing Director Nossaman, LLP Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. 1666 K Street NW, Suite 500 225 108th Avenue NE Washington, DC 20006 Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: (213) 612-7817 tel: (425) 974-4004 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Dean Bodnar Sean Clark Mgr. Leasing & Property Development Terminal Manager The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Port of St. Helens 4 World Trade Center PO Box 190 Port Department, 17th Floor Columbia City, OR 97018 150 Greenwich Street tel: (503) 397-2888 New York, NY 10007 email: [email protected] tel: (212) 435-4218 email: [email protected] 9/26/2018 Page 1 of 5 Port Real Estate Workshop 9/18/2018 - 9/18/2018 Seattle, WA Christie Coats Jodi Gibson Director of Real Estate Manager of Training and Programs Port of New Orleans American Association of Port Authorities 1350 Port of New Orleans Place 3420 N.
    [Show full text]