DOCSLIB.ORG

29 CFR Part 38

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

87130 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2016 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WIA, and these WIOA provisions took (ADA),6 as amended by the Americans effect on July 1, 2015. To ensure no with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Office of the Secretary regulatory gap while this rule was (ADAAA),7 and Section 501 of the prepared, the Department’s Civil Rights Rehabilitation Act,8 which are enforced 29 CFR Part 38 Center (CRC) issued a final rule in July by the Equal Employment Opportunity RIN 1291–AA36 2015 (‘‘2015 rule’’), codified at 29 CFR Commission (EEOC); Executive Order part 38, which applies until this rule 11246 9 and Section 503 of the Implementation of the takes effect. The 2015 rule retained the Rehabilitation Act,10 which are enforced Nondiscrimination and Equal provisions in 29 CFR part 37 (‘‘1999 by the Department’s Office of Federal Opportunity Provisions of the rule’’) but simply substituted all Contract Compliance Programs Workforce Innovation and Opportunity references to WIA with WIOA to reflect (OFCCP); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act the proper statutory authority. This final Act, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, rule revises the 2015 rule and generally and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor. carries over the policies and procedures Act, which are enforced by each federal ACTION: Final rule. found in the 1999 and 2015 rules, which funding agency; and Title IX, which is implemented the equal opportunity and enforced by each federal funding agency SUMMARY: This final rule revises the U.S. nondiscrimination provisions of WIA that assists an education or training Department of Labor (Department) and WIOA, respectively. Like the 1999 program. regulations implementing the and 2015 rules, this final rule is CRC issued a notice of proposed nondiscrimination and equal organized into subparts A through E. rulemaking (NPRM) on January 26, opportunity provisions of Section 188 of 2016, to implement the the Workforce Innovation and Purpose of the Regulatory Action nondiscrimination and equal Opportunity Act (WIOA). Signed by CRC enforces Section 188 of WIOA, opportunity provisions of WIOA, President Obama on July 22, 2014, which prohibits exclusion of an informed by CRC’s experience under the WIOA superseded the Workforce individual from participation in, denial 1999 rule implementing WIA. CRC Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) as the of the benefits of, discrimination in, or maintains regular contact with the Department’s primary mechanism for denial of employment in the regulated community, and this contact providing financial assistance for a administration of or in connection with resulted in some of the changes to the comprehensive system of job training any programs and activities funded or 2015 rule that were proposed in the and placement services for adults and otherwise financially assisted in whole NPRM. During the 60-day public eligible youth. Section 188 of WIOA or in part under Title I of WIOA because comment period, CRC received 360 prohibits the exclusion of an individual of race, color, religion, sex, national comments 11 on the proposed rule. from participation in, denial of the origin, age, disability, or political Comments came from a wide variety of benefits of, discrimination in, or denial affiliation or belief, or, for beneficiaries, stakeholders, including State and local of employment in the administration of applicants, and participants only, on the agencies; civil rights and advocacy or in connection with any programs and basis of citizenship status, or groups, such as language access activities funded or otherwise participation in a program or activity organizations, disability rights financially assisted in whole or in part that receives financial assistance under organizations, and organizations serving under Title I of WIOA because of race, Title I of WIOA. Section 188 of WIOA lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender color, religion, sex, national origin, age, incorporates the prohibitions against (LGBT) individuals; religious disability, or political affiliation or discrimination in programs and organizations; and labor organizations. belief, or, for beneficiaries, applicants, activities that receive federal financial After a full review of the comments, and participants only, on the basis of assistance under certain civil rights CRC adopts this final rule incorporating citizenship status, or participation in a laws, including Title VI of the Civil many of the provisions proposed in the program or activity that receives Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) (prohibiting NPRM, with some modifications that are financial assistance under Title I of discrimination based on race, color, or discussed in the Section-by-Section WIOA. This final rule updates national origin in programs and analysis below. Department regulations consistent with activities receiving federal financial This rule sets forth the WIOA Section current law and addresses its 1 assistance), Title IX of the Education 188 nondiscrimination and equal application to current workforce Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) opportunity requirements and development and workplace practices (prohibiting discrimination based on sex obligations for ‘‘recipients’’ as that term and issues. in education and training programs is defined in § 38.4(zz). These DATES: 2 Effective Date: These regulations receiving federal financial assistance), requirements and obligations arise in are effective December 2, 2016. the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (prohibiting discrimination based on 6 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. Naomi Barry-Perez, Director, Civil age),3 and Section 504 of the 7 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq., Public Law 110–325, Rights Center, U.S. Department of Labor, Rehabilitation Act (Section 504) 122 Stat. 3553 (2008). 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N– (prohibiting discrimination based on 8 29 U.S.C. 791. 4123, Washington, DC 20210. CRC- disability).4 CRC interprets the 9 Executive Order 11246, 30 FR 12319, Sept. 24, 1965, as amended by Executive Order 11375, 32 FR [email protected], telephone (202) 693– nondiscrimination provisions of WIOA 14303, Oct. 17, 1967; Executive Order 12086, 43 FR 6500 (VOICE) or (202) 877–8339 consistent with the principles of Title 46501, Oct. 10, 1978; Executive Order 13279, 67 FR (Federal Relay Service—for TTY). VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII),5 77141, Dec. 12, 2002; Executive Order 13665, 79 FR 20749, Apr. 8, 2014; and Executive Order 13672, 79 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION the Americans with Disabilities Act : FR 42971, July 21, 2014. 10 29 U.S.C. 793. Executive Summary 1 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq. 11 This includes one comment that was 2 Regulatory History 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. withdrawn and reissued without personally 3 42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq. identifiable information and one comment WIOA contains the identical 4 29 U.S.C. 794. documenting contact with an outside party during provisions of Section 188 as appeared in 5 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. the comment period. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:34 Dec 01, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02DER2.SGM 02DER2 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 87131 connection with programs or activities Since their promulgation in 1999, the to align them with current law and legal financially assisted under WIOA Title I regulations implementing Section 188 of principles. As discussed above, in as explained further below. The final WIA or WIOA had not undergone enforcing the nondiscrimination rule describes the enforcement substantial revision. The 2015 rule obligations of recipients set forth in this procedures for implementing the made only technical revisions to the part, CRC follows the case law nondiscrimination and equal 1999 rule, changing references from principles developed under, among opportunity provisions of WIOA. ‘‘WIA’’ to ‘‘WIOA.’’ Thus, the 2015 rule other statutes, Title VI and Title VII of Although WIOA did not change the did not reflect recent developments in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of nondiscrimination and equal equal opportunity and the Education Amendments of 1972, opportunity provisions in Section 188, nondiscrimination jurisprudence. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of Congress mandated that the Department Moreover, procedures and processes for 1973, and the Americans with issue regulations to implement the enforcement of the nondiscrimination Disabilities Act, as amended by the section, including standards for and equal opportunity provisions of ADAAA. Since the issuance of the WIA determining discrimination and Section 188 had not been revised to Section 188 regulations in 1999, the enforcement procedures, as well as reflect changes in the practices of principles of nondiscrimination and procedures to process complaints.12 recipients since 1999, including the use equal opportunity law under these To best understand the application of of computer-based and internet-based statutes have evolved significantly, and this regulation, readers are encouraged systems to provide aid, benefits, the ADA has been amended. Agencies to review the ‘‘applicability’’ language at services, or training through WIOA Title enforcing these statutes have issued § 38.2, the definition of ‘‘financial I-financially assisted programs and regulations and guidance impacting assistance’’ under Title I of WIOA at activities. WIOA Title I-financially assisted § 38.4(x) and (y), and the definition of For these reasons, this final rule programs and activities to reflect these ‘‘recipient’’ at § 38.4(zz). Entities revises 29 CFR part 38 to set forth legal developments.18 During that time, connected to the workforce recipients’ nondiscrimination and equal the Department has issued final rules development system may be recipients opportunity obligations under WIOA under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation for purposes of Section 188 and this rule Section 188 in accordance with existing Act and Executive Order 11246.19 even if they do not receive assistance in law and policy. This rule updates the Third, this final rule improves the the form of money.
Recommended publications
  • City Council & Successory Regular Meeting Agenda 5-3-21

    City Council & Successory Regular Meeting Agenda 5-3-21

    CITY OF SAN FERNANDO CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SAN FERNANDO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA SUMMARY MAY 3, 2021 – 6:00 PM TELECONFERENCE – PER GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE ORDER SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19 On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20, please be advised that the San Fernando City Council will participate in meetings telephonically. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Pursuant to the Executive Order and given the current health concerns, members of the public can access meetings live on-line, with audio and video, via YouTube Live, at https://www.youtube.com/c/CityOfSanFernando. Comments submitted via YouTube will not be read into the record. Members of the public may submit comments by email to [email protected] no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting, to ensure distribution to the City Council prior to consideration of the agenda. Those comments will be distributed to the City Council will be limited to three minutes, and made part of the official public record of the meeting. Callers interested in providing a live public comment, may call Telephone Number: (669) 900-6833; Meeting ID: 833 6022 0211; and Passcode: 92496 5, between 6:00 p.m.
  • Eyesontheprize-Studyguide 207.Pdf

    Eyesontheprize-Studyguide 207.Pdf

    A Blackside Publication A Study Guide Written by Facing History and Ourselves Copyright © 2006 Blackside, Inc. All rights reserved. Cover photos:(Signature march image) James Karales; (Front cover, left inset image) © Will Counts, Used with permission of Vivian Counts; (All other inset images) © Bettmann/Corbis Design by Planet Studio For permissions information, please see page 225 FOREWORD REP. JOHN LEWIS 5th Congressional District, Georgia The documentary series you are about to view is the story of how ordinary people with extraordinary vision redeemed “If you will protest courageously and democracy in America. It is a testament to nonviolent passive yet with dignity and …. love, when resistance and its power to reshape the destiny of a nation and the history books are written in future generations, the historians will the world. And it is the chronicle of a people who challenged have to pause and say, ‘There lies a one nation’s government to meet its moral obligation to great people, a black people, who humanity. injected new meaning and dignity We, the men, women, and children of the civil rights move- into the very veins of civilization.’ ment, truly believed that if we adhered to the discipline and This is our challenge and our philosophy of nonviolence, we could help transform America. responsibility.” We wanted to realize what I like to call, the Beloved Martin Luther King, Jr., Community, an all-inclusive, truly interracial democracy based Dec. 31, 1955 on simple justice, which respects the dignity and worth of every Montgomery, Alabama. human being. Central to our philosophical concept of the Beloved Community was the willingness to believe that every human being has the moral capacity to respect each other.
  • Exploring the Limits of Executive Civil Rights Policymaking

    Exploring the Limits of Executive Civil Rights Policymaking

    Oklahoma Law Review Volume 61 Number 1 2008 Exploring the Limits of Executive Civil Rights Policymaking Stephen Plass St. Thomas University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the President/ Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Plass, Exploring the Limits of Executive Civil Rights Policymaking, 61 OKLA. L. REV. 155 (2008), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol61/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oklahoma Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF EXECUTIVE CIVIL RIGHTS POLICYMAKING STEPHEN PLASS* Racial equality for blacks remains a minefield issue for American presidents. Any position a president takes is bound to alienate someone. As a result, even a well-meaning president such as Bill Clinton has had to tread very carefully when addressing this topic.1 Popular attitudes shaped by the powerful continue to dictate the extent to which presidents are able to confront continuing racial discrimination and its legacy of inequality in American life.2 Although many laws ordaining racial equality have been written, discrimination remains a normal part of life in America. This reality makes the President’s role in this area almost as difficult
  • Request for Qualifications and Proposals

    Request for Qualifications and Proposals

    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS for HYDROLOGICAL, BIOLOGICAL, BOTANICAL, CULTURAL, AND COST PLANNING STUDY for the FORBES CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF LAKEPORT Doug Grider, Public Works Director City of Lakeport 225 Park Street Lakeport, CA 95453 Funded by Community Development Block Grant Program February 22, 2021 Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................2 A. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Background .................................................................................................................................... 2 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................2 III. SCOPE OF WORK. .........................................................................................................3 IV. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS .....................................................................................5 A. Identification of Prospective Consultant ........................................................................................ 5 B. Management ................................................................................................................................... 5 C. Personnel .......................................................................................................................................
  • Title IX: How We Got It and What a Difference It Made

    Title IX: How We Got It and What a Difference It Made

    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 55 Issue 4 Article 4 2007 Title IX: How We Got It and What a Difference it Made Bernice Resnick Sandler Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Education Law Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Bernice Resnick Sandler, Title IX: How We Got It and What a Difference it Made, 55 Clev. St. L. Rev. 473 (2007) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol55/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TITLE IX: HOW WE GOT IT AND WHAT A DIFFERENCE IT MADE* BERNICE RESNICK SANDLER† I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ................................................. 473 II. OTHER TITLE IX ISSUES ...................................................... 484 III. WHAT TITLE IX HAS ACCOMPLISHED ................................. 486 IV. WHAT STILL NEEDS TO BE DONE........................................ 487 I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND At the end of the 1960s, the women’s movement is only a few years old. There is little awareness of sex discrimination throughout the nation. The words “sexism” and “sexist” have not yet been invented, nor the words “sexual harassment” or “date rape.” Even the words “sex discrimination” have only just entered the lexicon with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There is not much interest in women’s issues except from a few women, a few small women’s groups, and a few men of good will, and some negative members of the press.
  • Presidential Authority to Impose Requirements on Federal Contractors

    Presidential Authority to Impose Requirements on Federal Contractors

    Presidential Authority to Impose Requirements on Federal Contractors Vanessa K. Burrows Legislative Attorney Kate M. Manuel Legislative Attorney June 14, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41866 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Presidential Authority to Impose Requirements on Federal Contractors Summary Executive orders requiring agencies to impose certain conditions on federal contractors as terms of their contracts have raised questions about presidential authority to issue such orders. Recently, the Obama Administration circulated, but did not issue, a draft executive order directing “every contracting department and agency” to require contractors to “disclose certain political contributions and expenditures.” The draft order cites the President’s constitutional authority, as well as his authority pursuant to the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (FPASA), which authorizes the President to prescribe any policies or directives that he considers necessary to promote “economy” or “efficiency” in federal procurement. The draft executive order refers to FPASA’s goals in that it directs actions “to ensure the integrity of the federal contracting system in order to produce the most economical and efficient results for the American people.” The draft order has been characterized by some as an “abuse of executive branch authority” because it resembles the Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections (DISCLOSE) Act that the 111th Congress considered, but did not pass. If issued, the draft order may face legal challenge. The outcome of legal challenges to particular executive orders pertaining to federal contractors generally depends upon the authority under which the order was issued and whether the order is consistent with or conflicts with other statutes.
  • Vol. 82 Friday, No. 193 October 6, 2017 Pages 46655–46892

    Vol. 82 Friday, No. 193 October 6, 2017 Pages 46655–46892

    Vol. 82 Friday, No. 193 October 6, 2017 Pages 46655–46892 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:39 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\06OCWS.LOC 06OCWS sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with FRONT MATTER WS II Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
  • ARTS COMMISSION Engaging Community Through Authentic Artistic Experiences

    ARTS COMMISSION Engaging Community Through Authentic Artistic Experiences

    ARTS COMMISSION Engaging Community Through Authentic Artistic Experiences MEMBERS Sarah G. Triplett, Chair AGENDA Meegan Holland, Vice Chair Lisa Biering March 21, 2019 Matt Borghi-Weil Jessica Gregg 5:30 PM Tedda Hughes Karen Jennings 54B District Court, Courtroom 1, 101 Linden Street Radhika Sen VACANT 1) Opening City Council Liaison A) Roll Call Councilmember Aaron Stephens B) Approval of Agenda for March 21, 2019 C) Approval of Minutes for February 21, 2019 Staff Liaison Wendy Wilmers Longpre (517) 319-6940 2) Communication from the Audience City of East Lansing PARKS AND RECREATION 3) Written Communications DEPARTMENT 410 Abbot Road East Lansing, MI 48823 4) Reports (517) 337-1731 A) Chairperson www.cityofeastlansing.com B) Council Liaison C) East Lansing Arts Festival Liaison D) Staff Report i. FY2020 Budget Update ii. Art Selection Process 5) Committee Reports A) Cultural Arts Planning i. Consultant Services Request for Proposals 6) Business Items A) Ordinance 1339 Applications B) Other 7) Discussion Items A) Art Fesitval Collaborations i. Delind Proposal ii. MSU Student Mural iii. People’s Choice Award B) Mural Projects i. Greetings Tour Mural ii. Disruption for Dignity Mural Proposal C) Other 8) Adjourn ARTS COMMISSION Engaging Community Through Authentic Artistic Experiences MEMBERS Sarah G. Triplett, Chair Minutes Meegan Holland, Vice Chair Lisa Biering February 21, 2019 Matt Borghi-Weil Jessica Gregg 5:30 PM Tedda Hughes Karen Jennings 54B District Court, Courtroom 1, 101 Linden Street Radhika Sen VACANT Present: Chairperson Sarah G. Triplett, Vice-Chairperson Meegan Holland, City Council Liaison Commissioners Matt Borghi-Weil, Jessica Gregg, Tedda Hughes, Karen Jennings and Councilmember Aaron Stephens Radhika Sen.
  • Federal and State Laws and Executive Orders

    Federal and State Laws and Executive Orders

    Federal and State Laws and Executive Orders Discrimination, whether intentional or not, is prohibited by law. The legal authority in this area is summarized as follows: FEDERAL Basis Description Enforcing Agency Executive Order 11246 Nondiscrimination and affirmative Department of (as amended by action in employment for federal Labor (DOL) Executive Order 11375) contractors on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin Title VII of the Civil Nondiscrimination in employment on Equal Employment Rights Act of 1964 (as the basis of race, color, national origin, Opportunity amended by the Civil religion, and sex Commission Rights Act of 1991) (EEOC) Title VI of the Civil Rights Nondiscrimination in education on the Department of Act of 1964 basis of race, sex, and national origin. Education (DED) Equal Pay Act of 1963 Nondiscrimination in wages on the EEOC basis of sex Title IX of the Education Nondiscrimination in education on DED Amendments of 1972 basis of sex Age Discrimination in Nondiscrimination in employment on EEOC Employment Act of 1967 the basis of age Genetic Nondiscrimination in employment on EEOC Nondiscrimination Act of the basis of genetic information and 2008 prohibition on intentionally collecting genetic information from employees Vietnam Era Veterans’ Nondiscrimination and affirmative DOL Readjustment action in employment on the basis of Assistance Act of 1974 status as a Vietnam era veteran or disabled veteran Jobs for Veterans Act of Nondiscrimination and affirmative DOL 2009 action in employment on
  • Request for Proposals for Engineering Design, Bidding and Construction Management and Inspection Services

    Request for Proposals for Engineering Design, Bidding and Construction Management and Inspection Services

    Tioga County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Request for Proposals for Engineering Design, Bidding and Construction Management and Inspection Services For REGIONAL SUSQUEHANNA RIVER INITIATIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND STREAM RESTORATION FULLER HOLLOW CREEK: DOWNSTREAM STAIR PARK STREAM STABILIZATION PROJECT September 17, 2020 A project funded by and conceived through the NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program of the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery Responses must be received by: 12:00p.m. (Eastern), October 14, 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Overview .................................................................................................................. 4 2 Project Description ............................................................................................................................... 5 3 Deadlines and Completion Date ........................................................................................................... 6 4 Scope of Work ...................................................................................................................................... 6 5 Submittal Content ................................................................................................................................ 8 6 Selection Process .................................................................................................................................. 9 7 Specific Legal Obligations ..................................................................................................................
  • Chapter Three Setting the Stage for Affirmative Action in the United States of America

    Chapter Three Setting the Stage for Affirmative Action in the United States of America

    CHAPTER THREE SETTING THE STAGE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3.1 The USA — An Overview To understand the current debate over affirmative action in the USA, all of America’s racial history, from colonial times, through slavery, Reconstruction, the Jim Crow era, the civil rights era to the present day must be analysed. The reason for this is that it has been suggested that sometimes a misunderstanding of the history of affirmative action is the principle reason that most white people have difficulty in seeing their historical and current privilege.1 The current scope of affirmative action programmes is best understood as an effort to remedy oppression of racial and ethnic minorities and of women.2 However, broader discrimination against persons because of their race, ethnic background, religion and gender has also been widespread. Some affirmative action programmes began before the promulgation of various civil rights statutes in the 1950's and 1960's, but affirmative action measures did not truly take hold until it became clear that anti-discrimination statutes alone were not enough to break long standing patterns of discrimination. This chapter is a study of equal employment opportunity, with specific emphasis on the development of affirmative action in the USA. It examines the development of public policies designed to eradicate and overcome the effects of economic discrimination. Economic discrimination has been an inherent feature of race relations in the US since the first blacks arrived in the Northern American colonies in 1619.3 It was widespread in 1 Rubio Philip A History of Affirmative Action — 1619-200 (2001) (Phillip).
  • The Federal Anti-Bias Effort

    The Federal Anti-Bias Effort

    Upjohn Institute Press The Federal Anti-Bias Effort Jonathan S. Leonard University of California Chapter 6 (pp. 85-113) in: Essays on the Economics of Discrimination Emily P. Hoffman, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1991 DOI: 10.17848/9780585255859.ch6 Copyright ©1991. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. All rights reserved. The Federal Anti-Bias Effort Jonathan S. Leonard University of California Affirmative action under the federal contract compliance program (Ex ecutive Order 11246 as amended) is a policy that, at times, has promoted modest employment advances for minorities, but always at the cost of great social discord. To its proponents, affirmative action is both equitable and efficient. To its critics, it is neither. Federal affirmative action may be modeled as a tax on white male employment in contractor firms, and so can be analyzed in the standard two-sector models applied to unionization or taxation (Leonard 1984a). A controversial question is whether this tax improves or reduces effi ciency. Some proponents of affirmative action advocate it for equity reasons, arguing for retribution for past wrongs such as slavery, or for an investment in future social peace and cohesion. Increased equity may also improve efficiency by counterbalancing discrimination. In Decker©s model of discrimination, for example, an affirmative action tax forces employers towards the efficient use of labor (Leonard 1984c). The two questions to be asked of affirmative action are first, whether it has in creased minority and female employment, and second (and more dif ficult), whether this has induced or reduced discrimination. The purpose and development of affirmative action cannot be fully understood outside of history, a history that includes most saliently the institution of slavery in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and the civil rights movement of the mid-twentieth century.