Peaceful Coexistence Projects - 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peaceful Coexistence Projects - 2019 Ukraine: Peaceful Coexistence Projects - 2019 1 2 1 Equal opportunities for a better future 38 Repair of physical rehabilitation room in the Sviatohirsk Sievierodonetsk Luhanska 2 Support for the community center named Center for rehabilitation of children with disabilities Sievierodonetsk "Green Lab" in Sievierodonetsk in Chystiakove Projects implemented by UNHCR GCA 3 Repair and equipment of premises for a 39 Installation of an outdoor Stage to ensure access 73 ¯ community center in Bobrove for local residents and partners in Donetska and Luhanska oblasts 3 to stress-relief activities for conflict-affected Bobrove and IDPs population 4 Repair and equipment of the premises for a 40 Support to Diagnostic Department in conflict- Sloviansk 4 8 sociocultural center in Shchastia for local affected area 5, 6 Shchastia Stanytsia residents and IDPs Novotoshkivske 41 Replacement of plumbing equipment in Luhanska 9 5 Novotoshkivske-bomb shelter Valuiske kindergarten #316 in Donetsk city 6 Initiation of minors-friendly space in 42 Replacement of windows in school #76 in 11 Zolote Stanytsia Novotoshkivske Donetsk city Increasing capacity of local school #16 in Zolote Klynove 7 Luhanska 7 43 Improving the infrastructure of the Child's City 12 10 8 Renovation of two rooms and provision of NFIs Clinical Hospital #1 of Donetsk Zaitseve Zolote Luhansk to Kondrashivka House of Culture to promote 44 Rehabilitation of the ward in the infectious social cohesion through creative activities, 14 13 department of the Donetsk Regional Children's Donetska Kodema Vidrodzhennia Luhansk community gatherings and joint events. Clinical Hospital 9 Valuiske youth center Maiorske 16 45 Assistance to the community of people with GCA Travneve 15 10 Repair works at Luhansk high college of disabilities "Donetski Zori" 18, 19 Myronivskyi physical education ("Zarya" department) 46 Rehabilitation of the community center for Toretsk 22, 23 Center for Psychological Relief in Klynove 17 11 people with hearing impairments in Donetsk city Vuhlehirsk 24 12 Community Initiative Centre “Nadezhda” in Druzhba 47 Ensuring comfortable and safe learning 20 Olenivka 25, 26 Bakhmutka environment in Donetsk School #91 through Novhorodske 21 Bulavynske Luhanska 13 Rehabilitation of community centre in replacement of windows Horlivka Vidrodzhennia first aid point 48 Dialogue of Generations Kharkivska 33 27 NGCA 14 Rehabilitation of Kodema village house of Flame of Hope for youth with disabilities 35 Betmanove Olkhovatka 37 culture 49 Service center in Slavne Avdiivka 29, 30 Antratsyt 15 Rehabilitation of a gym in Myronivskyi 50 Bunhe Bearing walls screed in the building of 31, 32 28 16 Joint community center in Travneve first aid 51 Yenakiieve 36 Korsun point ambulatory of Novyi Svit settlement Yasynuvata The designations employed and the presentation of material on 17 Rehabilitation of a school hall in Druzhba 52 Rehabilitation of school #27 in Dokuchaievsk city 39, 40 34 this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever 53 Sports ground in Dokuchaievsk town Krasnohorivka Shchebenka 18 Rehabilitation of a gym of specialized school in on the part of the United Nations (and UNDP) concerning the legal Toretsk 54 Replacement of windows in Petrivske school Donetsk status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or 49 19 Center for provision of social services in 55 Repair of community services centre in Styla 38 concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. village Marinka 41, 42, 43, 44, Toretsk Chystiakove GCA: Government-controlled areas 56 Heating boiler for Kindergarten “Solnyshko” in 45, 46, 47, 48 NGCA: Non-Government controlled areas 20 Intergenerational center in Novhorodske Marinka Donetsk 21 Repair of community services centre in Styla village 52, 53 Donetska Horlivka 57 Leisure Sports Center 50 51 58 Rehabilitation of Rozdolne village ambulatory Slavne Dokuchaievsk 22 Rehabilitation of playground in Vuhlehirsk Novyi Svit NGCA 23 Rehabilitation of school in Vuhlehirsk city 59 Rehabilitation of the Department of Intensive Novotroitske 24 Installation of a bus stop in Olenivka village Care of Volnovaskyi Raion Hospital 55, 56 54 60 Repair of community services centre in Styla 25 Playground for children (Oleksandrivske 57 Petrivske UNHCR Sub-office village, Bulavynske village) Starolaspa village Mykolaivka 26 Installation of street lights in Bulavynske 61 РСР Center for joint activities for local residents 58 UNHCR Field Office Rozdolne village and IDPs in Starohnativka 59 62 Novohryhorivka-well Volnovakha UNHCR Field Unit 27 Rehabilitation of playground in Olkhovatka 60 village 63 Creation of a children's playground in village Michurine 61 Starolaspa UN Global Hub / Service Centre 28 Installation of street lights in Yenakiieve Starohnativka agglomeration villages 64 Kindergarten bus upgrade in Boikivske 63 RUSSIAN UN Logistics Hub 29 Rehabilitation of playground in Bunhe 65 Chermalyk-street lighting Zaporizka 62 Michurine FEDERATION 30 Renovation of recreation area in Bunhe town 66 Rehabilitation of community center in Pavlopil Novohryhorivka " Entry-exit checkpoint 31 Rehabilitation of playground in Korsun village 67 Repair of Samiilove Feldsher-Midwife Station 64 32 Rehabilitation of the school in Korsun village (first aid point) 65 Boikivske Project location 33 Installation of playground in Betmanove 68 Replacement of windows in Khomutove school Chermalyk 67 village 69 Replacement of windows in school #1 of Contact line Grateful to our partners: Hnutove Samiilove 34 Rehabilitation of playgrounds and creation of Novoazovsk city 68 Area near the contact line - 5km child-friendly spaces for the conflict-affected 70 Replacement of windows in Novoazovsk school 66 Khomutove community #2 Pavlopil 69, 70, 71, 72 Area near the contact line - 20km 35 Leisure and Development Center in Avdiivka 71 Roof repairs for educational institutions in Novoazovsk МОСТ Mariupol 36 Replacement of windows, renovation and Novoazovsk town Regional border reflooring in school #1 in Yasynuvata 72 Bicycles for social workers of Territorial center for 73 37 Repair works at Antratsyt college of elderly in Novoazovsk town 25km Neighbouring country Sea of Azov Siedove information technologies and economics 73 Replacement of windows in Siedove school Date: 30 Jun 2020 Sources: UNHCR Author: UNHCR - Kyiv UNHCR is grateful for the generous support provided by donors, including the European Union’s Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO); the Governments of Canada, Denmark, Feedback: [email protected] Filename: PСP_2019_all_new Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom (DFID), the United States of America (PRM) as well as Private Citizens who are contributing funds through different UNHCR private associations such as España con ACNUR of Spain and the UNO Flüchtlingshilfe of Germany..
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine
    ` A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine August, 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This assessment was commissioned by UNICEF, with data collected remotely by REACH in July 2015 from key informants at water, health, and education facilities as well as from affected communities. Thanks go to all those individuals and organisations who contributed towards this assessment, including the Global WASH Cluster who contributed to the final analysis and drafting. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT, its sister organisation ACTED, and the United Nations Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions. For more information, write to [email protected], visit www.reach-intiative.org and follow us @REACH_info. Cover photo: Delivery of drinking water to Debaltseve, Donetsk Oblast, March 2015, ©UNICEF i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conflict has been ongoing in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts since May 2014, with spikes of violence in June 2014 and again in January-February and in July 2015. Attempts to negotiate a political solution to the conflict led to the ‘Minsk’ ceasefire signed between the Governments of Ukraine, Russian Federation and the non-state actors in September 2014. However, the truce collapsed within days, similar to a new ceasefire agreement signed in February 2015. Relative calm around the Contact Line (CL) has ensued since September 2015, however, the situation remains fragile given lack of trust between the parties to the conflict. From the end of 2014, Ukrainian legislation has restricted freedom of moment of both people and goods, in addition to the cessation of salary and pension payments in the non-governmental controlled areas (NGCAs), increasing hardship for local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 256/2019 29 October 20191
    1 Daily Report 256/2019 29 October 20191 Summary Compared with the previous 24 hours, the SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and more in Luhansk region. Small-arms fire was assessed as aimed at an SMM mini-unmanned aerial vehicle near non-government-controlled Sentianivka. The SMM saw for the first time anti-tank mines near Dokuchaievsk and unexploded ordnance near Molodizhne. Inside the Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement area, the Mission continued to observe construction works to the bridge. The Mission observed weapons in violation of their respective withdrawal lines in a government-controlled area of Donetsk region and in non-government-controlled areas of Luhansk region The SMM continued to observe long queues of civilians travelling across the contact line in Donetsk region. Restrictions of the Mission’s freedom of movement continued, including at checkpoints near non-government-controlled Novoazovsk and Zaichenko.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded Number of ceasefire violations3 recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 28 October 2019. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Hnutove and Shyrokyne were not operational. On the night of 28-29 October, fog limited the observation capabilities of majority of the SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. 2 Map of recorded ceasefire violations 3 In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations, including fewer explosions (55), compared with the previous 24 hours (about 140 explosions).
    [Show full text]
  • English, Ukrainian and Russian At
    THEMATIC REPORT RESTRICTIONS TO THE SMM’S FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND OTHER IMPEDIMENTS TO FULFILMENT OF ITS MANDATE July — December 2019 April 2020 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of conclusions 4 Introduction 5 Roles and responsibilities 6 The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 6 The signatories of the Minsk agreements 6 The Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) 6 Categories of restrictions 7 Overview of restrictions 8 Restrictions involving gunfire near SMM patrols, direct threats and violent behaviour 10 Restrictions at checkpoints 11 Restrictions related to monitoring of withdrawal of weapons 14 SMM means of remote observation 15 Border areas outside government control 18 Disengagement areas 19 Mines, UXO and other explosive objects 22 Impediments to gathering information 24 Contribution of the JCCC 25 Conclusions 26 Annex 1: Graphs and Maps 28 Annex 2: Violence and threats against or in the presence of the SMM 31 Annex 3: Table of incidents involving weapons aimed at SMM mini- and mid-range UAVs 32 3 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS • The SMM’s unhindered, unrestricted and • Failure to remove existing mines, unconditional freedom of movement is unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other crucial to the implementation of its explosive objects or laying of new ones mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin
    WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 November - 31 December 2017 Issue 12 WASH Cluster Coordinator OVERALL INCIDENTS ANALYSIS FOR 2017: TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS Mark Buttle [email protected] In 2017 the WASH Cluster recorded 1351 separate incidents in total, each of which put at risk the water supply or sanitation to 4.8 million people served by centralized systems in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine, with almost WASH Cluster IMOs: 60% occurring in the first 6 months. Volodymyr Kalinin Donetsk oblast experienced 116 incidents: 14 in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and 102 in Non-Government [email protected] Controlled Areas (NGCA). In Luhansk oblast there were only 19 incidents: 17 in GCA areas and only 2 in NGCA areas. This is not to say Luhansk was less affected: a single incident near Popasna, in April, cut water for around Stas Dymkovskyy 180,000 people for 27 consecutive days. The WASH Cluster notes that people were almost always affected on [email protected] both sides of the Line of the Contact for most incidents. In the overview, all months were different, however there were three main periods of increased activity, when there was heavy shelling around critical water infrastructure along the Line of Contact: February and March; May KEY FACTS to July; and December (see below). Ceasefires were effective only for relatively short-time periods. 135 is the total number of WASH Incidents and their effect, 2017 Of the 135 incidents, WASH incidents since the start 25 7,000,000 of 2017. water infrastructure was damaged or 6,000,000 Geographical breakdown of stopped due to explo- incidents by oblast and by gov- 20 sive risk 80 times; and ernment controlled versus non- 5,000,000 electricity cuts due to government controlled areas: shelling affected water 15 Donetsk Luhansk Total 4,000,000 supply another 46 times.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019
    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian 2019 Situation Report No. 2 © UNICEF/2019/Fillipov UNICEF’s Response with Partners UNICEF 2019 Sector/Cluster 2019 2019 Funds Available UNICEF Cumulative Cluster Cumulative Funds Target results (#) Target results (#) received Nutrition 2,000 0 to date: 1,300,000 n/a Health1 24,800 663 $.6M 3% 2 WASH 1,125,500 361,269 2,000,000 371,365 Child 170,000 18,044 1,300,000 n/a Carry- Protection forward Funding Education 34,500 12,989 200,000 n/a amount: gap: $3.3M HIV & AIDS3 200 0 n/a n/a $17.2M 16% 81% Number of people in need: 3,000,0004 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Number of children in need of humanitarian assistance: 500,0005 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs On 31 January, the 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian Response Plan was launched in Kiev jointly with the Ministry of Temporary Occupied Territories (MTOT), requesting US$162 million to provide aid to 2.3 million people affected by the conflict. This includes UNICEF’s requirement of $21,067,799. During the month of February, two Member States briefings were organized – one in New York and the other one in Brussels. On the day of the Member States briefing in New York (12.02.2019), at the initiative of the Russian Government, the Security Council called for a meeting to discuss the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine. The Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Deputy Emergency Relief Coordinator, Ursula Mueller, briefed the Council on the humanitarian situation and its consequences on civilian population, with a special mention on the targeting of water infrastructure and water workers, as 1 UNICEF target additionally includes the estimated 80% immunization coverage of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella and polio vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    FSC.DEL/32/15 18 February 2015 ENGLISH only Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 780-th FSC Plenary Meeting (18 February 2015 at 10.00, Hofburg) Mr. Chairman, The agreements reached in Minsk in September 2014 and February 2015 must be fully implemented, and no action should be taken that would run contrary to the letter and spirit of these agreements. For its part, Ukraine strictly adheres to the implementation of these agreements as this is the only possible way towards the peaceful resolution in Donbas. In strict compliance with the agreement, reached in Minsk on 12 February 2015, the Ukrainian forces ceased fire along the entire line of contact since 00.00 hrs of 15 February. We proceed from understanding that achieving sustainable and comprehensive ceasefire would be a crucial step towards full implementation of the Minsk agreements of 5 and 19 September 2014 as well as the “Package of Measures” of 12 February 2015. Regrettably, despite the certain decrease of hostilities, the situation in Donbas remains very tense and numerous violations of the ceasefire on the side of the pro-Russian militants have been registered. The total number of violations of the ceasefire by the illegal armed groups over 15 February reached 164. Just on the first day of the ceasefire, Ukrainian positions around Debaltseve were shelled with mortars, artillery and MRLS 88 times. The militants also used tanks to attack the Ukrainian forces. The militants claimed in public that the Minsk agreements, in their opinion, did not relate to the situation around Debaltseve and declared that they would continue attacking the city for they have a “right to shell at Debaltseve as it is their own territory”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Country Office
    Ukraine Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 2/2021 UNICEF/2021/Filippov Situation in Numbers Reporting Period: 1 January – 30 June 2021 Highlights 510,000 children in need of Following a relative calm second half of 2020, ceasefire violations notably intensified in the first half of 2021, with significant deterioration of the overall security situation. Until May 1, the humanitarian assistance UN recorded 39 civilian casualties which was 22 per cent higher than the previous four months (32 casualties). Active armed clashes along the Line of Contact (LoC) also resulted in damages to schools and health facility. As a result, the humanitarian community, including UNICEF, 3,400,000 people launched a contingency plan to prepare for any possible escalation. in need (HRP, Jan 2021) The COVID-19 pandemic continued to generate an additional burden on the economy and healthcare services. From March to June, Ukraine experienced a third wave of the pandemic outbreak, resulting in strict lockdowns across the country and in some parts of eastern Ukraine. 189,000 Ukraine’s national vaccination campaign remained slow, with less than two million of its adult Internally displaced people in population being fully vaccinated as of 29 July. The access to the non-government-controlled need (IDPs, HRP, Jan 2021) areas (NGCA) remained a major challenge for the humanitarian community from the start of the pandemic. In the first half of 2021, UNICEF received USD 9 million, out of a USD 14.7 million appeal. The health, education and HIV/AIDS programmes remain largely under-funded. UNICEF Appeal 2021 US$ 14.7 million UNICEF’s Response and Funding Status Funding status 68% Funding status 100% Funding status 100% Funding status 69% Funding status 31% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs The ongoing hostilities continued to affect schools and hospitals along the Line of Conflict (LoC) in eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 239/2020 7 October 20201 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 239/2020 7 October 20201 Summary The SMM recorded three ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and one in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded nine ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and five in Luhansk region. A woman and a boy were injured by the explosion of a device near Zolote- 5/Mykhailivka, Luhansk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. During night hours, an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle spotted a person inside the disengagement area near Zolote. The SMM saw four weapons in violation of withdrawal lines in a non-government- controlled area of Luhansk region. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians amid the COVID-19 pandemic, including at an entry-exit checkpoint and the corresponding checkpoint of the armed formations in Luhansk region. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 6 October 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational. 3 Including explosions 4 Including from unidentified weapons - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded three ceasefire violations – all undetermined explosions in areas north-north-west of Staropetrivske (non-government-controlled, 35km north-east of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine
    UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2016
    ХРИСТОС НАРОДИВСЯ! CHRIST IS BORN! THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXIV-LXXXV No. 52-1 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, DECEMBER 25, 2016 – SUNDAY, JANUARY 1, 2017 $2.00 Sviatoslav Karavansky, Report calls Russian artillery attacks against Ukraine prominent Soviet-era in 2014 ‘acts of war,’ as fi ghting in Donbas escalates political prisoner, dies by Mark Raczkiewycz KYIV – Russia extensively used cross- border artillery fire against Ukrainian mili- tary targets in July-September 2014 in what are considered “acts of war,” accord- ing to a new report by Bellingcat, a group of citizen journalists who use open-source investigation tools and techniques, that was released on December 21. Numbering in the “thousands,” the report says, the cross-border projectiles were the “first and strongest evidence of a direct Russian participation in the fighting.” Although they were already proven to have occurred by Ukrainian officials and the U.S. Ihor Dlaboha government, the new report analyzed the Sviatoslav Karavansky at the Ukrainian extent to which they were used in the sum- National Association in 1980. mer of 2014, when they largely contributed UUARC to stemming a Ukrainian counterattack to Serhiy Yermakov retake the border areas near Russia, and Wounded Ukrainians soldiers get evacuated some 800 meters from the frontline near PHILADELPHIA – Sviatoslav cut off and surround the occupied Donbas Luhanske, a village situated along what is known as the Rostov-on-Don highway,
    [Show full text]