DOCSLIB.ORG

Respondents – Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and the Solicitor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Respondents – Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and the Solicitor File No. 31597 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: ADIL CHARKAOUI APPELLANT (Appellant) - and - MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION, SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENTS (Respondents) - and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, CRIMINAL LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION (ONTARIO), CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION, BARREAU DU QUÉBEC, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, ASSOCIATION DES AVOCATS DE LA DÉFENSE DE MONTRÉAL, ASSOCIATION QUÉBÉCOISE DES AVOCATS ET AVOCATES EN DROIT DE L’IMMIGRATION INTERVENERS RESPONDENTS’ FACTUM English Translation Supreme Factum 2005 Limoges Street 613-737-0834 – Tel. Longueuil, Québec 450-442-2040 – Fax J4G 1C4 [email protected] L-2859-06 - 2 - JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Minister of Justice Deputy Attorney General of Canada By : Mtre. Christopher Rupar By : Mtre. Claude Joyal Ms. Ginette Gobeil Department of Justice Ministry of Justice 200 René-Lévesque Blvd. West 234 Wellington Street Complexe Guy-Favreau Room 1216 East Tower, 5th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario Montreal, Quebec H2Z 1X4 K1A 0H8 (514) 283-8768 – Tel. (Mtre. Joyal) (613) 941-2351 – Tel. (514) 496-8115 – Tel. (Ms. Gobeil) (613) 954-1920 – Fax (514) 283-3856 – Fax [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Respondents Agent for Respondents Ms. Dominique Larochelle Mtre. Yavar Hameed Centre communautaire juridique de Montréal Hameed Farrokhazad LLP 800 de Maisonneuve Blvd. East 43 Florence Street 9th Floor Ottawa, Ontario Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M7 K2P 0W6 (514) 842-2233 Ext: 266 – Tel. (613) 232-2688 Ext: 223 – Tel. (514) 842-1970 – Fax (613) 232-2680 – Fax [email protected] [email protected] Attorney for Appellant Agent for Appellant Mtre. Russell Silverstein Henry S. Brown, Q.C. 20 Dundas Street West Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Suite 1100 2600 - 160 Elgin Street Toronto, Ontario P.O. Box 466, Stn "D" M5G 2G8 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1C3 (416) 977-5334 – Tel. (613) 233-1781 – Tel. (416) 977-8513 – Fax (613) 563-9869 – Fax [email protected] Attorney for Intervener Agent for Intervener Criminal Lawyers’Association (Ontario) Criminal Lawyers’Association (Ontario) - 3 - Mtre. Lorne Waldman Henry S. Brown, Q.C. Waldman & Associates Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP 281 Eglinton Avenue East 2600 - 160 Elgin Street Toronto, Ontario P.O. Box 466, Stn "D" M4P 1L3 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1C3 (416) 482-6501 – Tel. (613) 233-1781 – Tel. (416) 489-9618 – Fax (613) 563-9869 – Fax [email protected] [email protected] Attorney for Intervener Agent for Intervener Canadian Bar Association Canadian Bar Association Mtre. François Dadour Poupart, Dadour et Associés 507 Place d'Armes, Suite 1402 Montreal, Quebec H2Y 2W8 (514) 526-0861 – Tel. (514) 526-9646 – Fax [email protected] Attorney for Intervener Barreau du Québec Mtre. Michael Bossin Community Legal Services-Ottawa Carleton 1 Nicholas Street, Suite 422 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 7B7 (613) 241-7008 – Tel. (613) 241-8680 – Fax Attorney for Intervener Amnesty International - 4 - Mtre. Walid Hijazi Desrosiers, Turcotte, Massicotte 480 St-Laurent Blvd., B-503 Montreal, Quebec H2Y 3Y7 (514) 397-9284 – Tel. (514) 397-9922 – Tel. Attorney for Intervener Association des avocats de la défense de Montréal Ms. Pia Zambelli 6855, de L'Épée Avenue Suite 203 Montreal, Quebec H3N 2C7 (514) 274-9393 – Tel. (514) 274-5614 – Fax Attorney for Intervener Association Québécoise des Avocats et Avocates en Droit de l’Immigration Attorney General of Ontario Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Burke-Robertson 70 Gloucester Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0A2 (613) 236-9665 – Tel. (613) 235-4430 – Fax [email protected] Agent for Intervener Attorney General of Ontario - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS RESPONDENTS’ FACTUM Page Volume I PARTIE I – CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS .............................................. 1 a) Overview .............................................. 1 b) The facts .............................................. 2 1. The legislative context: the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act .............................................. 2 2. The meetings of Service employees with the appellant .............................................. 3 3. Judicial consideration .............................................. 4 4. Judicial consideration of the certificate is suspended .............................................. 7 5. Summary of interviews held on 31 January and 2 February 2002 .............................................. 8 6. Additional information from 6 January 2005 .............................................. 9 7. Fourth detention review of the appellant ............................................ 10 7.1 Adjournment of the hearing on the fourth detention review ............................................ 11 8. Appellant’s motion for a stay of proceedings ............................................ 11 9. Judgment of Mr. Justice Noël ............................................ 11 10. Judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal ............................................ 13 11. The new evidence: policies and procedures of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service ............................................ 14 12. New arguments from the appellant ............................................ 15 - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS RESPONDENTS’ FACTUM Page Volume I (cont’d) PARTIE II – CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE QUESTIONS IN ISSUE ............................................ 16 PARTIE III – CONCISE STATEMENT OF ARGUMENT ............................................ 17 1. Legislation prior to passage of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act ............................................ 19 1.1 The Mackenzie Commission (1969) ............................................ 20 1.2 The McDonald Commission (1981) ............................................ 20 1.3 Bill C-157 and the Pitfield Report (1983) ............................................ 21 1.4 Conclusion ............................................ 21 2. CSIS Act ............................................ 23 2.1 Conclusion ............................................ 27 3. Operational policies ............................................ 27 4. Summary of interviews held on 31 January and 2 February 2002 and the additional information dated 6 January 2005 ............................................ 30 5. Compliance with principles of fundamental justice and the lack of prejudice ............................................ 31 5.1 Delay in providing the summaries of 31 January and 2 February 2002 and the summary of the “additional information” ............................................ 31 5.2 Admissibility of “additional information” – compliance with fundamental justice and lack of prejudice ............................................ 32 5.3 Interview notes – applicable principles of fundamental justice and lack of prejudice ............................................ 33 - iii - TABLE OF CONTENTS RESPONDENTS’ FACTUM Page Volume I (cont’d) 6. Reliability of interview summaries, information or other evidence ............................................ 36 7. Stay of proceedings ............................................ 37 8. Conclusion ............................................ 38 PARTIE IV – COSTS ............................................ 38 PARTIE V – ORDER REQUESTED ............................................ 39 PARTIE VI – TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................ 40 PARTIE VII – LEGISLATION ............................................ 44 Annex I Criminal Code (R.S., 1985, ch. C-46) ...........................................45 Canadian Human Rights Act (R.S., 1985, ch. H-6) ...........................................53 Charities Registration (Security information) Act (2001, ch. 41) ...........................................55 Canada Evidence Act (R.S., 1985, ch. C-5) ...........................................58 Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (2005, ch. 46) ...........................................61 Privacy Act (L.R., 1985, ch. P-21) ...........................................62 Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (2000, ch. 5) ...........................................65 Access to Information Act (R.S., 1985, ch. A-1) ...........................................66 Specific Claims Resolution Act (2003, ch. 23) ...........................................69 Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act (R.S., 1985, ch. C-23) ...........................................71 - iv - TABLE OF CONTENTS RESPONDENTS’ FACTUM Page Volume I (cont’d) Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada (2001, ch. 29) ...........................................72 Employment Equity Act (1995, ch. 44) ...........................................74 Official Languages Act (1985, ch. 31 (4th supp.)) ...........................................76 Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Act, 2005 ch. 10 ...........................................77 - French version ...........................................80 Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act (an Act to establish the), 1984, ch. 21 ...........................................83 An Act to establish the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (administrative codification, September 2006) .........................................130 Volume II Bill C-57 - an Act establishing the Canadian Security Intelligence Act, 1984, ch. 21 .........................................159 FOREING LEGISLATION Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act, 1979 .........................................215
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canlii - 2003 FC 1419 (Canlii) 11/04/2007 05:18 PM
    CanLII - 2003 FC 1419 (CanLII) 11/04/2007 05:18 PM Home > Federal > Federal Court of Canada > 2003 FC 1419 (CanLII) Français English Charkaoui (Re) (F.C.) v. Charkaoui (Re) (F.C.), 2003 FC 1419 (CanLII) Date: 2003-12-05 Docket: DES-3-03 Parallel citations: [2004] 3 F.C. 32 • (2003), 253 F.T.R. 22 URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2003/2003fc1419/2003fc1419.html Reflex Record (noteup and cited decisions) DES-3-03 2003 FC 1419 IN THE MATTER OF a certificate and its referral under subsection 77(1) and sections 78 to 80 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the IRPA) IN THE MATTER OF the warrant for the arrest and detention and the review of the reasons for continued detention pursuant to subsections 82(1), 83(1) and 83(3) of the IRPA IN THE MATTER OF the constitutional validity of sections 33, 76 to 85 of the IRPA AND IN THE MATTER OF Mr. Adil Charkaoui Indexed as: Charkaoui (Re) (F.C.) Federal Court, Noël J.--Montréal, October 8, 9 and 21; Ottawa, December 5, 2003. Citizenship and Immigration -- Exclusion and Removal -- Removal of Permanent Residents -- Application contesting validity of Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), ss. 33, 77 to 85 establishing procedure for determining whether permanent resident danger to national security, safety of any person -- Applicant found by Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Solicitor General to be engaged in terrorism as member of Usama bin Laden network -- Ordered detained -- Designated judge responsible for determining whether certificate reasonable, detention should be continued, having jurisdiction to decide constitutional questions -- Procedure strikes fair balance between right of State to protect national security, right of permanent resident to be adequately informed of allegations against him to be able to defend self -- In light of interests at stake, procedure under Act consistent with principles of fundamental justice protected by Charter, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Adil Charkaoui Appel
    Court File No. 30672 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: ADIL CHARKAOUI APPELLANT AND: MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT Court File No. 30929 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: HASSAN ALMREI APPELLANT AND: MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENTS 1 Court File No. 31178 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: MOHAMED HARKAT APPELLANT AND: MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENTS AFFIDAVIT OF MURRAY MOLLARD (APPLICATION OF THE BCCLA FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE) I, MURRAY MOLLARD, Barrister and Solicitor, of 550-1188 West Georgia Street, in the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, MAKE OATH AND SAY AS FOLLOWS: 1. I am the Executive Director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (“BCCLA”) and accordingly have personal knowledge of the facts and matters hereinafter deposed to, save and except where the same are stated to be on information and belief, and, as to such facts, I verily believe the same to be true. 2. The BCCLA is a non-profit non-partisan advocacy group incorporated on February 27, 1963 under the British Columbia Societies Act. The purpose of the BCCLA is to promote, defend, sustain, and enhance civil liberties throughout British Columbia and Canada. The BCCLA has at 2 present approximately 950 members and contributors involved in various professions, trades and callings.
    [Show full text]
  • Adil Charkaoui Appelant C. Ministre De La
    326 CHARKAOUI v. CANADA [2008] 2 S.C.R. Adil Charkaoui Appellant Adil Charkaoui Appelant v. c. Minister of Citizenship and Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de Immigration and Solicitor General of l’Immigration et Solliciteur général du Canada Respondents Canada Intimés and et Attorney General of Ontario, Criminal Procureur général de l’Ontario, Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario), Canadian Lawyers’ Association (Ontario), Association Bar Association, Barreau du Québec, du Barreau canadien, Barreau du Québec, Amnesty International, Association Amnistie internationale, Association des avocats de la défense de Montréal des avocats de la défense de Montréal et and Québec Immigration Lawyers Association québécoise des avocats et avocates Association Interveners en droit de l’immigration Intervenants Indexed as: Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship Répertorié : Charkaoui c. Canada and Immigration) (Citoyenneté et Immigration) Neutral citation: 2008 SCC 38. Référence neutre : 2008 CSC 38. File No.: 31597. No du greffe : 31597. 2008: January 31; 2008: June 26. 2008 : 31 janvier; 2008 : 26 juin. Present: McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Présents : La juge en chef McLachlin et les juges Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ. Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron et Rothstein. on appeal from the federal court of en appel de la cour D’appel fédérale appeal Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Right Droit constitutionnel — Charte des droits — Droit à to life, liberty and security of person — Procedural
    [Show full text]
  • Canlii - 2003 FC 882 (Canlii) 11/04/2007 05:12 PM
    CanLII - 2003 FC 882 (CanLII) 11/04/2007 05:12 PM Home > Federal > Federal Court of Canada > 2003 FC 882 (CanLII) Français English Charkaoui (Re) (F.C.), 2003 FC 882 (CanLII) Date: 2003-07-15 Docket: DES-3-03 Parallel citations: [2004] 1 F.C. 528 • (2003), 237 F.T.R. 143 URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2003/2003fc882/2003fc882.html Reflex Record (noteup and cited decisions) DES-3-03 2003 FC 882 IN THE MATTER of a certificate pursuant to subsection 77(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the Act); IN THE MATTER of the referral of this certificate to the Federal Court of Canada pursuant to subsection 77(1) and sections 78 and 80 of the Act; IN THE MATTER of the warrant for the arrest and detention and the review of the reasons justifying continued detention pursuant to subsections 82(1), 83(1) and 83(3) of the Act; AND IN THE MATTER OF Mr. Adil Charkaoui. Indexed as: Charkaoui (Re) (F.C.) Federal Court, Noël J.--Montréal, July 2 and 3; Ottawa, July 15, 2003. Citizenship and Immigration -- Exclusion and Removal -- Inadmissible Persons -- Security grounds -- Ministers referring certificate to Federal Court -- Detention review -- Ministers believe respondent Osama bin Laden terrorist network member -- Constituting danger to Canadian security -- Court following provisions of legislation, interpretation of designated judge's role provided by Ahani v. Canada -- Evidence at hearing summarized -- Standard of proof that stated by Thurlow C.J. in Attorney General of Canada v. Jolly -- Designated judge must be
    [Show full text]
  • To Csista L K - O R Li S T E N
    TOP Top Ten 10 Reasons REASONS NOT to Talk - or ListenNO -T T O to TALK - O R LIS T EN - CSIS T O CSIS 1 Talking with CSIS can be dangerous for you Over the past months, reports of Canadian Security Intelligence Service Even though CSIS agents do not have powers of arrest and detention, (CSIS) visits to the homes and even workplaces of people working for CSIS can and does use information it gathers in seemingly innocuous social justice have multiplied. In addition to its longstanding and ongoing conversations to write security assessments for immigration applications, harassment and intimidation of indigenous peoples, immigrant com- detention and deportation under security certificates, various blacklists 1 munities and others, the spy agency has become much more visible in its (the no fly list, border watch lists, etc.) and other purposes. Innocent comments you make can be taken out of context and misinterpreted, surveillance of movements for social justice. but you will have no opportunity to correct errors, because intelligence information remains secret. 2 This information can have a serious impact The People’s Commission is aware of dozens of such visits in the Mon- on your life. treal area alone. People visited range from writers and artists to staff at advocacy organizations and anarchists living in collective houses. Unan- 2 nounced, in the morning, the middle of the day or the evening, CSIS Talking with - and listening to - CSIS can agents knock at the door of private homes. Their interest is far rang- be dangerous to others ing: from the tar sands, to the G8, to indigenous organizing, Palestine solidarity, Afghanistan; who you know and what you think.
    [Show full text]
  • Adil Charkaoui Appelant C. Ministre De La Citoyenneté Et De L'immigration
    350 CHARKAOUI v. CANada [2007] 1 S.C.R. Adil Charkaoui Appellant Adil Charkaoui Appelant v. c. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de Minister of Public Safety and Emergency l’Immigration et ministre de la Sécurité Preparedness Respondents publique et de la Protection civile Intimés and et Attorney General of Ontario, Amnesty Procureur général de l’Ontario, Amnistie International, British Columbia Civil internationale, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Bar Liberties Association, Association du Association, Canadian Civil Liberties Barreau canadien, Association canadienne Association, Canadian Council for Refugees, des libertés civiles, Conseil canadien pour African Canadian Legal Clinic, International les réfugiés, African Canadian Legal Clinic, Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, National Coalition pour la surveillance internationale Anti-Racism Council of Canada, Canadian des libertés civiles, National Anti-Racism Arab Federation, Canadian Council on Council of Canada, Fédération canado- American-Islamic Relations, Canadian arabe, Canadian Council on American- Muslim Civil Liberties Association, Criminal Islamic Relations, Canadian Muslim Civil Lawyers’ Association (Ontario), Federation Liberties Association, Criminal Lawyers’ of Law Societies of Canada, University of Association (Ontario), Fédération des ordres Toronto, Faculty of Law — International professionnels de juristes du Canada, Human Rights Clinic, and Human Rights University of Toronto, Faculty of Law — Watch Interveners
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Inadequate Response to Terrorism: the Need for Policy
    Fraser Institute Digital Publication February 2006 Canada’s Inadequate Response to Terrorism: The Need for Policy Reform by Martin Collacott CONTENTS Executive Summary / 2 Introduction / 3 The Presence of Terrorists in Canada / 4 An Ineffective Response to the Terrorism Threat / 6 New Legislation and Policies / 16 Problems Dealing with Terrorists in Canada / 21 Where Security Needs To Be Strengthened / 27 Problems with the Refugee Determination System / 30 Permanent Residents and Visitors’ Visas / 52 Canada Not Taking a Tough Line on Terrorism / 60 Making Clear What We Expect of Newcomers / 63 Working With the Muslim Community / 69 Concluding Comments and Recommendations / 80 Appendix A: Refugee Acceptance Rates / 87 References / 88 About the Author / 100 About this Publication / 101 About The Fraser Institute / 102 Canada’s Inadequate Response to Terrorism 2 Executive Summary Failure to exercise adequate control over the entry and the departure of non-Canadians on our territory has been a significant factor in making Canada a destination for terror- ists. The latter have made our highly dysfunctional refugee determination system the channel most often used for gaining entry. A survey that we made based on media reports of 25 Islamic terrorists and suspects who entered Canada as adults indicated that 16 claimed refugee status, four were admitted as landed immigrants and the channel of entry for the remaining five was not identified. Making a refugee claim is used by both ter- rorists and criminals as a means of rendering their removal from the country more difficult. In addition to examining specific shortcomings of current policies, this paper will also look at the reasons why the government has not rectified them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terrorist Sleeper Threat in an Age of Anxiety About the Author
    DSFG/WIIS-C Working Paper April 2021 Author Dr. Shannon Nash The Terrorist Sleeper Threat in an Age of Anxiety About the Author Dr. Shannon Nash is the Postdoctoral Network Manager of the North American and Arctic Defence and Security Network (NAADSN). She coordinates NAADSN events, re- search projects and outputs, multimedia presence, website, and reports. She promotes relationships between the network and collaborators and manages NAADSN’s student and graduate research fellows. As part of her work with NAADSN, Dr. Nash is a post-doctoral r esearch fellow at Trent University studying past and present terrorist threats and attacks as well as Canadian, American, and international defence, security and counterterrorism policies. Her current research examines the fluidity of the “terrorism” label and how the label is informed and applied to a violent attack in Canada. This research looks at how racism, Islamophobia and white supremacy, and how and who we frame as “other”, or “terrorist”, are all profoundly connected. Dr. Nash is also working on a project at the University of Water- loo that looks at education and training in national security and counterterrorism in Cana- da. She has recently completed a review of important studies and practical efforts to anticipate and reduce risk factors contributing to lasting traumatization of terrorist victims for a chapter in the forthcoming Handbook of Terrorism Prevention and Preparedness (Ed. Alex P. Schmid). Dr. Nash received her Ph.D. in History from the University of Toronto with a focus on 20th Cen- tury American History, Terrorism, and International Relations. Her doctoral thesis looks at the reality of al Qaeda espionage methodology and how the idea of a sleeper agent was per- ceived and adapted to fit the terrorist threat posed by al Qaeda from the 1990s onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • On Immigration Security Measures
    People’s Commission on Immigration Security Measures Final Report — February 2007 Initiating groups Coalition Justice for Adil Charkaoui Coalition Justice for Adil Charkaoui formed in Montreal in a matter of days after his abrupt arrest. The Coalition – an alliance of progressive Muslim groups, refugee and immigrant rights organizations, anti-oppression groups and the Charkaoui family – demands the immediate release of all Security Certificate detainees, no deportations, a fair trial, an immediate end to the “Security Certificate” system, an end to scape-goating in response to American pressure, and an end to the harassment of Muslims and Arabs. Contact: (514) 859-9023 [email protected] www.adilinfo.org Solidarity Accross Borders Solidarity Across Borders is a network of non-status, refugees and immigrants and their supporters. Solidarity across borders has come together on four main demands for refugees and immigrants: the regularisation of all non-status people in Canada; no deportations; no detentions; and the abolition of security certificates. Contact: (514) 859-9023 [email protected] www.solidarityacrossborders.org QPIRG-Concordia QPIRG-Concordia is a community and student resource centre based at Concordia University that supports grassroots initiatives, projects and research related to environmental and social justice issues. QPIRG is committed to being inclusive and accessible to all; we recognize the links between various forms of oppression and are actively opposed to discrimination on the basis of gender, race, class, sexual orientation, dis/ability, health, size, citizenship status, language and spiritual beliefs. Contact: (514) 848-7585 [email protected] Table of contents Acronyms . .1 Glossary . .3 Introduction . .7 1 National Security and Racial Profiling .
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal to the Canadian Supreme Court
    Court File No. 30762 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) B E T W E E N: ADIL CHARKAOUI Appellant - and - MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents __________________ Court File No. 30929 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) B E T W E E N: HASSAN ALMREI Appellant - and - MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION, and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents __________________ Court File No. 31178 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) B E T W E E N: MOHAMED HARKAT Appellant - and - MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION, THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents - and - CRIMINAL LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION (ONTARIO); UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, FACULTY OF LAW – INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH; CANADIAN COUNCIL OF AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS AND CANADIAN MUSLIM CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION; CANADIAN ARAB FEDERATION; CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION; CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES, AFRICAN CANADIAN LEGAL CLINIC, INTERNATIONAL CIVIL LIBERTIES MONITORING GROUP AND NATIONAL ANTI-RACISM COUNCIL OF CANADA; AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL CANADA; CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION; FEDERATION OF LAW SOCIETIES OF CANADA; BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Interveners FACTUM OF THE INTERVENERS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, FACULTY OF LAW – INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC and HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH TABLE OF CONTENTS PART
    [Show full text]
  • Ru 54 Fall2005.Pdf (1.647Mb)
    R E F U G E E U P D A T E ISSUE NO. 54 A joint PROJECT OF the FCJ REFUGEE centre AND THE CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES fall 2005 Inside: How few are Au nom de la Legal aid update Family reuni- Widening our Drop the fee! Watchdog too many?: securite from british fication tents tries to bring A “missing per- Columbia csis to heel sons” report P. 2 P.4 P. 5 P.6 P.8 P.9 P. 11 U.N. Group is Gravely Concerned about Some Immigration Detention By Catherine Balfour According to Dennis Bueckert of Canadian non-citizens and are based on secret evidence. Even Press, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary the suspect's lawyer is not allowed to see it. If the cer- Detention is gravely concerned about Canada's tificate is found to be reasonable by a court, the sus- system of jailing suspected terrorists without pect is deported to his or her country of origin. trial, using national security certificates. Persons de- The Working Group noted that all four tained under security certifi- of the people currently detained under cates are denied the right to security certificates are Arab Muslims, a fair hearing. and one of them has been detained for five years. All four of the suspects now The UN Working Group in detention argue they face a risk of tor- spoke out at a press confer- ture if returned to their homelands. ence held on the 16th of June at the end of its 2005 visit "We consider that these people are de- this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Cases Involving Diplomatic Assurances Against Torture
    Cases Involving Diplomatic Assurances against Torture Developments since May 2005 Introduction Austria Mohamed Bilasi-Ashri (Update) Canada Lai Cheong Sing (Update) Security Certificate Cases (Update) Mohammad Zeki Mahjoub: Torture Risk Assessment (Update) Germany Metin Kaplan (Update) Netherlands Nuriye Kesbir (Update) Russian Federation Ivanovo Refugees’ Case Sweden Mohammed al-Zari and Ahmed Agiza (Update) United Kingdom Omar Mohammed Othman (also known as Abu Qatada) United States Maher Arar (Update) Bekhzod Yusupov Introduction Human Rights Watch has observed since 2003 the growing use of diplomatic assurances against torture and other ill-treatment as a means of returning terrorism suspects to countries where they face the risk of such abuse.1 This document sets out developments in the use of diplomatic assurances in select individual cases since the publication of our April 2005 report “Still at Risk: Diplomatic Assurances No Safeguard Against Torture.”2 Austria Mohamed Bilasi-Ashri (Update)3 In 2005 the Austrian government renewed its efforts to extradite Egyptian national Mohamed Bilasi- Ashri, wanted in his home country, using diplomatic assurances. The Court of Appeal in Vienna first ordered Bilasi-Ashri’s extradition to Egypt in November 2001. Bilasi- Ashri had previously been sentenced in absentia in Egypt to 15 years of hard labor for alleged involvement in an Islamist extremist group.The court considered Bilasi-Ashri’s claim that he would be at risk of torture or ill-treatment and would not be given a fair trial upon return, but concluded that “Egypt was not a country where serious large scale violations of human rights could be considered an institutionalised everyday practice … *t+hus there was no general obstacle to extradition.”4 The Court of Appeal dismissed evidence that members of Islamist groups in Egypt are frequently subjected to torture and ill-treatment, including electric shocks, beatings, burning, and various forms of psychological abuse.
    [Show full text]