Manningham Heritage Study Review 2005 Volume 2: Heritage Place & Precinct Citations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manningham Heritage Study Review 2005 Volume 2: Heritage Place & Precinct Citations Manningham Heritage Study Review 2005 Volume 2: Heritage Place & Precinct Citations Final 16 February, 2006 Prepared for Manningham City Council © Context Pty Ltd 2005 Project Team: David Helms, Senior Consultant Jackie Donkin, Consultant Karen Olsen, Senior Consultant Natica Schmeder, Consultant Martin Turnor, Consultant Dr Carlotta Kellaway, Historian Fiona Gruber, Historian Context Pty Ltd 22 Merri Street, Brunswick 3056 Phone 03 9380 6933 Facsimile 03 9380 4066 Email [email protected] i ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I Overview i Purpose i HOW TO USE II Introduction ii Description ii History iii Statement of Significance iii Recommendations iii REFERENCES IV LIST OF CITATIONS V CITATIONS VI iii MANNINGHAM HERITAGE STUDY REVIEW 2005 INTRODUCTION Overview This Heritage Place & Precinct Citations report comprises Volume 2 of the Manningham Heritage Study Review 2005 (the Study). The purpose of the Study is to complete the identification, assessment and documentation of places of post-contact cultural significance within Manningham City (the study area) and to make recommendations for their future conservation. This volume contains all the citations for heritage places and precincts throughout the City of Manningham including: • All of the places assessed or reviewed by this Study (see below). • All of the places identified or assessed by previous studies including the City of Doncaster & Templestowe Heritage Study (1991), City of Doncaster & Templestowe. Additional Sites Recommendations (1993), Doncaster & Templestowe Heritage Study Additional Historical Research (1994), and the Wonga Park Heritage Study (1996). • Places identified by individuals and organisations including Council’s Heritage Adviser, local historical societies and residents. The citations are derived from an electronic database known as the Manningham Local Heritage Places Database (Manningham LHPD), which uses a program that was developed by Heritage Victoria. This volume should be read in conjunction with Volume 1 – Key Findings and Recommendations, which provides an explanation of the study methodology and lists of the places and precincts assessed or reviewed by this Study. Purpose The rich and diverse cultural heritage of the City of Manningham illustrates the historic use, development and occupation of the land. This history is demonstrated by a wide range of heritage places that include buildings and structures, monuments, trees and landscapes, and archaeological sites. They have one thing in common: These are places that are worth keeping because they enrich our lives – by helping us to understand the past; by contributing to the richness of the present environment; and because we expect them to be of value to future generations. (The Burra Charter) These places give Manningham a sense of historic continuity as well as a distinctive character. They reveal the way local communities in Manningham in past years thought about their local area as well as indicating prevailing economic, social and political circumstances that may have extended outside Manningham to include the whole of Victoria. The purpose of the heritage place and precinct citations is to provide a description of the history of the place and its surviving fabric (including buildings, trees, fences, etc.) and, on this basis, to provide an assessment of the significance of the place. Further detail about how places were assessed can be found in Volume 1 of the Study. i HERITAGE PLACE & PRECINCT CITATIONS HOW TO USE Introduction The citations in this volume are listed in alphabetical order by the name of the place and use a standard report layout provided by the Manningham Local Heritage Places Database. There are citations for two types of heritage places: • Places of local significance to Manningham City. These are places that are either already included in the Heritage Overlay of the Manningham Planning Scheme or are recommended for inclusion. Some of these places are also of State significance and are included on the Victorian Heritage Register.1 • Places of local interest to Manningham City. These are places that are of some historic interest, but are not considered to be significant particularly when compared to similar places within Manningham City. Heritage places of local significance have quite detailed citations that explain the reasons why they are significant and provide recommendations for future conservation and management. The information that will be relevant to most users is included under the following headings: • Description • History • Statement of Significance • Recommendations On the other hand, citations for places heritage places of local interest generally contain only limited information. However, it is important to note that the citations are drawn from various studies that have been carried out over a 15 year period. Accordingly, the amount of information provided and where it appears in the citation may vary according to which study it is derived from. This is described further below. The terms used throughout this Study are consistent with The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Heritage Significance (1999). A glossary of key terms and their meanings is provided in Volume 1. Description This provides a description of all the surviving physical fabric (such as buildings, trees, fences, etc.) that illustrates the history of the place and contributes to its significance. It may also describe elements that are considered intrusive or non-contributory to significance. However, for many places (particularly those assessed by the City of Doncaster & Templestowe Heritage Study (1991)), the description is provided within the History section. 1 For further information about the differences between places of local significance and local interest please refer to Volume 1 of this Study. ii MANNINGHAM HERITAGE STUDY REVIEW 2005 History This provides a history of place on the basis of the information available at the time of preparing the Study. It is not intended as a complete history of the place, but of the key events and influences that shaped its development. For example, the history would not usually provide a description of all of the owners of a place, but rather of those that were associated with key periods in its development, usually when it was first constructed or established, and when key changes or improvements were made. The extent of history depends on the availability of primary and secondary source material about a place. As described above, some histories also provide a description of the place. Statement of Significance The Statement of Significance is based upon the information known about a place including its history and the surviving physical fabric that illustrates that history. On this basis, it seeks to describe the principal reasons for the significance of the place and is intended to be: ... a brief, pithy but comprehensive statement of all the ways in which the place is significant. It should not just be a list of every conceivable reason for significance that the assessor can think up, however, it must state clearly and unequivocally the major reasons why the place is important. It must be supported by the presentation of sufficient evidence to justify the assessment judgement. (Pearson & Sullivan 1995.) Recommendations This provides recommendations for inclusion to any statutory registers including: • The Heritage Overlay of the Manningham Planning Scheme. • The Victorian Heritage Register or Heritage Inventory. • The National Heritage List. For places or precincts assessed or reviewed by this Study, it also includes general conservation objectives and guidelines for buildings (and trees, where relevant) to ensure that future use, development and management of the place is carried out in a manner that conserves (or minimises impact upon) its significance. iii HERITAGE PLACE & PRECINCT CITATIONS REFERENCES Context Pty Ltd. (1991) City of Doncaster & Templestowe Heritage Study Context Pty Ltd. (1997) Wonga Park Heritage Study Stages 1 and 2 Richard Peterson (1993) City of Doncaster & Templestowe Heritage Study Additional Sites Recommendations Dr. Carlotta Kellaway (1994) City of Doncaster & Templestowe Heritage Study: Additional Historical Research Isabell Ellender (1991) Archaeological Survey of Aboriginal Sites Australia ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Significance (the Burra Charter) (1999) iv MANNINGHAM HERITAGE STUDY REVIEW 2005 LIST OF CITATIONS v Manningham Heritage Study Review 2005 Place Street Locality ID BALWYN NORTH Shed (Australian Slate Co.) 402 Doncaster Road Balwyn North 286 BULLEEN Glenfern 10 Amberley Court Bulleen 146 Heidelberg Punt: site of Banksia Park Bulleen 75 Ben Nevis 21-25 Ben Nevis Grove Bulleen 1 Water Conduit Bridge Street Bulleen 378 Bridge Street Pine & Cypress Plantings 22-40 Bridge Street Bulleen 64 Journeys End 22-40 Bridge Street Bulleen 79 River Red Gum Cnr. Bridge Street & Manningham Road Bulleen 70 Bolin Swamp 193 Bulleen Road Bulleen 150 Cottage 228 Bulleen Road Bulleen 69 Group of Elms and Pines Kandanga Grove (cnr. Egan Drive) Bulleen 148 St Clement's Catholic Church 84 Manningham Road Bulleen 151 River Red Gum & Moreton Bay Fig 1 Robb Close Bulleen 341 Clarendon Eyre 6 Robb Close Bulleen 147 House 18 Summit Drive Bulleen 344 River Red Gum Templestowe Road Bulleen 72 Birrarung Park - Templestowe Road Bulleen 74 Brickworks (Boral) - Templestowe Road Bulleen 67 Banksia Park - Templestowe Road Bulleen 71 Market garden (former) 35
Recommended publications
  • Australia's National Heritage
    AUSTRALIA’S australia’s national heritage © Commonwealth of Australia, 2010 Published by the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts ISBN: 978-1-921733-02-4 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Heritage Division Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Email [email protected] Phone 1800 803 772 Images used throughout are © Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and associated photographers unless otherwise noted. Front cover images courtesy: Botanic Gardens Trust, Joe Shemesh, Brickendon Estate, Stuart Cohen, iStockphoto Back cover: AGAD, GBRMPA, iStockphoto “Our heritage provides an enduring golden thread that binds our diverse past with our life today and the stories of tomorrow.” Anonymous Willandra Lakes Region II AUSTRALIA’S NATIONAL HERITAGE A message from the Minister Welcome to the second edition of Australia’s National Heritage celebrating the 87 special places on Australia’s National Heritage List. Australia’s heritage places are a source of great national pride. Each and every site tells a unique Australian story. These places and stories have laid the foundations of our shared national identity upon which our communities are built. The treasured places and their stories featured throughout this book represent Australia’s remarkably diverse natural environment. Places such as the Glass House Mountains and the picturesque Australian Alps. Other places celebrate Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture—the world’s oldest continuous culture on earth—through places such as the Brewarrina Fish Traps and Mount William Stone Hatchet Quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 2
    1 Engineering Heritage Victoria Nomination for Recognition Engineering Heritage Australia Recognition Program 1956 Olympic Swimming & Diving Stadium July 2016 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 2 CAPTION FOR COVER PHOTOGRAPH This shows the North West Elevation of the Stadium as completed in 1956 Photo: Wolfgang Sievers (State Library of Victoria picture collection) 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction………………………………………......................................................5-7 2.0 Heritage Assessment .....……… ………….....................................................................7 2.1 Basic Data............................................................................................................7 2.1.1Item Name.......……………………………………….............................................7 2.1.2 Other/Former Name………………………………………...................................7 2.1. 3 Location………………………………………………………………………..........7 2.1.4 Address……………………………………….......................................................7 2.1.5 Suburb/ Nearest Town.......………………………………………………………...7 2.1.6 State……………………………………………………………………………….7 2.1.7 Local Government Area………………………………………………………..7 2.1.8 Owner……………………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.9 Current Use……………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.10 Former Use……………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.11 Designer………………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.12 Maker/Builder…………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.13 Year Started…………………………………………………………………….7
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Recommendation
    Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Name: Crossman House Address: 151 Finch Street, Glen Iris Local Government Authority: City of Stonnington Crossman House, December 2020. Executive Director recommendation Under Part 3, Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 I recommend to the Heritage Council of Victoria that the Crossman House, 151 Finch Street, Glen Iris, should not be included in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR). STEVEN AVERY Executive Director, Heritage Victoria DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: 11 January 2021 OFFICIAL Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Heritage Council determination The Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, recommends that the Heritage Council not include the Crossman House, 151 Finch Street, Glen Iris, in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) in accordance with section 49 of the Heritage Act 2017 (the Act) by determining that: • The Crossman House is not of State-level cultural heritage significance and should not be included in the VHR in accordance with s.49(1)(b) of the Act. • The information presented in this recommendation suggests that the Crossman House may be of potential local significance. • Under section 49(1)(c) of the Act the Heritage Council may wish to refer the recommendation and any submissions to the relevant planning authority for consideration for an amendment to a planning scheme. At the time of writing, the City of Stonnington had advertised an amendment to the Stonnington Planning Scheme (C304) to apply an individual Heritage Overlay to the Crossman House (HO643) and was considering submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • VICTORIAN NEWS ‘Our Heritage
    VICTORIAN NEWS ‘Our heritage... yesterday, today and tomorrow’ May 2010 Modernism today GONE TOMORROW P3 P9 our 2010 annual appEal P13 mEmBErs arE honourEd P14 WHat Have OUR BRANCHES BEEN UP TO? Events in Brief: May 2010 to June 2010 (see page 15 -18) National Trust of Australia (Vic) Tasma Terrace, 4 Parliament Place, East Melbourne Victoria 3002 Telephone: (03) 9656 9800 Facsimile: (03) 9650 5397 Email: [email protected] www.nattrust.com.au for Best Cultural Heritage Attraction in to increase significantly with this quarter Message from Australia win for the second year running seeing our largest growth in many years. for the Old Melbourne Gaol Crime and We welcome to their first edition of Vic the Chairman Justice Experience. This unprecedented News several hundred new members who Conservation issues feature repeat national award comes in addition have joined at our recent events. Among to two years success in the state awards. the new additions were the 53 families who heavily in this issue of Those members who have visited will joined at Rippon Lea’s successful 20th Teddy Vic News reflecting the know how confronting, and entertaining Bear’s Picnic, 86 families who joined via the whole Gaol experience now is. We Old Melbourne Gaol and 68 members who continuing pressure for owe thanks to the efforts of our staff and joined at the Melbourne International Flower development of our heritage. volunteers for this fantastic achievement! & Garden Show. Your support remains vital You will have also noticed how much if the Trust is to undertake the wide range A number of articles and reports in both media coverage has been generated in of responsibilities that it does as a peak the state and national magazines deal with Victoria on heritage issues including independent heritage body.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation of the Executive Director and Assessment of Cultural Heritage Significance Under Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017
    1 Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 Name Festival Hall (also known as West Melbourne Stadium) Location 272-306 Dudley Street, West Melbourne Provisional VHR Number H2386 Provisional VHR Category Registered Place Hermes Number 201568 Heritage Overlay City of Melbourne HO1183 (Interim Controls expire 1 March 2019) Festival Hall, Dudley Street, West Melbourne (March 2018) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL: • That Festival Hall be included as a Registered Place in the Victorian Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 2017 [Section 37(1)(a)]. This report contains names of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are now deceased. STEVEN AVERY Executive Director Recommendation Date: 10 May 2018 This recommendation report has been issued by the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria under s.37 of the Heritage Act 2017. It has not been considered or endorsed by the Heritage Council of Victoria. Name: Festival Hall Hermes Number: 201568 2 EXTENT OF NOMINATION Date that the nomination was accepted by the Executive Director 24 January 2018 Extent of nomination Festival Hall, 300 Dudley St, West Melbourne (whole of cadastral parcel), including Dudley Street canopy. Nomination extent diagram Is the extent of nomination the same as the recommended extent? Yes, however the property address has been altered to reflect the correct street number, 272-306 Dudley Street, West Melbourne. Name: Festival Hall Hermes Number: 201568 3 RECOMMENDED REGISTRATION All of the place shown hatched on Diagram 2386 encompassing all of Lot 1 on Title Plan 743078 and part of the road reserve for Dudley Street.
    [Show full text]
  • RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 1 Nº 2 2011 S T EN T N CO ADDITIONS ANATOL KAGAN to the COLLECTION COLLECTION Anatol Kagan (1913–2009) Architect Michael Bogle 4–7
    RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 1 Nº 2 2011 s T en T n CO ADDITIoNS ANATol KAGAN To THE COLLECTIoN COLLECTIoN Anatol Kagan (1913–2009) architect Michael Bogle 4–7 WILLIAM NANKIVELL COLLECTIoN William Nankivell (1928–2002) architect Harriet Edquist 8–13 Towards A histoRy of stuDENT activism IN LandscapE ArchitectuRE 14–15 Michael O’Connell: RESEARCH The Lost Modernist Harriet Edquist 16 icamAustralasia Symposium 2011 16 rmit design archives journal Journal Editor Editorial Assistance Design Harriet Edquist Kaye Ashton Letterbox.net.au contact [email protected] www.rmit.edu.au/designarchives issn 1838-9406 Published by rmit Design Archives, rmit University Text © rmit Design Archives, rmit University and individual authors. This Journal is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of Cover Image research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, Anatol Kagan, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted National Opera House, by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. Sydney, perspective, 1956. 2 EDIToRIAl Two collections representing the work of well-known local architectural practices have recently been donated to the rmit Design Archives, adding significant depth to our existing holdings. The Anatol Kagan Collection includes material relating to the Russian-born émigré’s Melbourne practice in the 1940s and early 1950s, and his subsequent Sydney practice from the 1960s. His post-war domestic architecture can be directly compared with that of other émigré architects whose work is represented in the Archives, including Frederick Romberg (rda Newsletter #1 2008), Ernest Fooks (some of whose drawings and books were donated to rmit a number of years ago by Noemi Fooks) and Frederick Sterne (rda Newsletter #1 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Recommendation
    Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Name: Crossman House Address: 151 Finch Street, Glen Iris Local Government Authority: City of Stonnington Crossman House, December 2020. Executive Director recommendation Under Part 3, Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 I recommend to the Heritage Council of Victoria that the Crossman House, 151 Finch Street, Glen Iris, should not be included in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR). STEVEN AVERY Executive Director, Heritage Victoria DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: 11 January 2021 OFFICIAL Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Heritage Council determination The Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, recommends that the Heritage Council not include the Crossman House, 151 Finch Street, Glen Iris, in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) in accordance with section 49 of the Heritage Act 2017 (the Act) by determining that: • The Crossman House is not of State-level cultural heritage significance and should not be included in the VHR in accordance with s.49(1)(b) of the Act. • The information presented in this recommendation suggests that the Crossman House may be of potential local significance. • Under section 49(1)(c) of the Act the Heritage Council may wish to refer the recommendation and any submissions to the relevant planning authority for consideration for an amendment to a planning scheme. At the time of writing, the City of Stonnington had advertised an amendment to the Stonnington Planning Scheme (C304) to apply an individual Heritage Overlay to the Crossman House (HO643) and was considering submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination 2018 (No 4)
    Australian Capital Territory Public Place Names (Taylor) Determination 2018 (No 4) Disallowable instrument DI2018–226 made under the Public Place Names Act 1989, s 3 (Minister to determine names) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Public Place Names (Taylor) Determination 2018 (No 4). 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after its notification day. 3 Determination of Place Names I determine the place names as indicated in the schedule. Erin Brady Delegate of the Minister for Planning and Land Management 9 August 2018 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au SCHEDULE (See section 3) Division of Taylor – Architects, town planners and urban designers The location of the public places with the following names is indicated on the associated diagram. NAME ORIGIN SIGNIFICANCE Ancher Street Sydney Edward Architect Cambrian Ancher Sydney Ancher gained his Diploma of Architecture (1904 – 1979) from the Sydney Technical College c.1929. He was awarded the Australian Medallion and in 1930 left for Europe, the recipient of the Byera Hadley Travelling Scholarship. Experience in the office of Joseph Emberton in London guided his early development as a Modernist. Ancher returned to Australia in 1936 convinced it was possible to evolve an Australian vernacular architecture based on the International Style he had seen in Europe championed by Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe and Gropius. After a second European tour (c. 1938-39) and a period of military service (1940- 44), Ancher began his private practice which focused on designing distinctive Modernist houses in the suburbs of Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Garden History Society Max Bourke Am
    AUSTRALIAN GARDEN HISTORY SOCIETY NATIONAL ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION ACT MONARO RIVERINA BRANCH Interviewee: MAX BOURKE AM Interviewer: ROSLYN BURGE Date of interview: 20 NOVEMBER 2019 Place of Interview: CAMPBELL, ACT Details: TWO AUDIO FILES – TOTAL 2 HR 36 MIN Restrictions on use: NIL All quotations: SHOULD BE VERIFIED AGAINST THE ORIGINAL SPOKEN WORD IN THE INTERVIEW SELECT CHRONOLOGY / AGHS FOR A MORE DETAILED CHRONOLOGY- SEE RESUME ATTACHED 1941 Born - 18 December, Chatswood, NSW 1976-83 Australian Heritage Commission (founding CEO) 1981-87 ICOMOS (International Vice President 1984-87) 1990s Max joined AGHS - is a member of the ACT Monaro Riverina Branch 2000-2002 Branch Chair 2001-2007 National Management Committee 2005-2007 Vice-Chair (Chair, Colleen Morris) 2002 Announcement about Studies in Australian Garden History - Call for papers 2004 Editorial Advisory Committee 2004 AM Member of the Order of Australia: for service to heritage and arts organisations and to the development of government policy for the preservation of Australia’s historic and cultural environment 2007 Meandering about the Murray, national conference held in Albury, hosted by ACT Monaro Riverina Branch 2009 The English Garden, Yarralumla 2013 National Arboretum Canberra opened 2016 The Scientist in the Garden, national conference held in Canberra, hosted by ACT Monaro Riverina Branch When interviewed Chairman of Friends of Australian National Botanic Gardens SUMMARY Max Bourke spoke briefly about his childhood responses to his family’s interests in gardens and growing orchids and vegetables, and his own Canberra garden and the impact on gardens of climate change. His was first aware of the Society before it was formed, when working at the Australian Heritage Commission (AHC - of which Max was Foundation Director) and he, David Yencken and Reg Walker in 1976 first discussed how the Commission could strengthen not-for-profit organisations, including those involved in industrial archaeology and public history.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey-Of-Post-War-Built-Heritage-In-Victoria-Stage-1-Heritage-Alliance-2008 Part2.Pdf (PDF File
    Identifier House Other name Milston House (former) 027-086 Address 6 Reeves Court Group 027 Residential Building (Private) KEW Category 472 House LGA City of Boroondara Date/s 1955-56 Designer/s Ernest Milston NO IMAGE AVAILABLE Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Architect’s Own Significance Architectural; aesthetic References This butterfly-roofed modernist house was designed by Ernest P Goad, Melbourne Architecture, p 171 Milton, noted Czech-born émigré architect, for his own use. Existing Listings AHC National Trust Local HO schedule Local Heritage Study Identifier House Other name 027-087 Address 54 Maraboor Street Group 027 Residential Building (Private) LAKE BOGA Category 472 House LGA Rural City of Swan Hill Date/s c.1955? Designer/s Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Image: Simon Reeves, 2002 Significance Aesthetic References Probably a rare survivor of the 1950s fad for decorating John Belot, Our Glorious Home (1978) houses, gardens and fences with shells and ceramic shards. This “Domestic Featurism” was documented by John Belot in the 1970s, but few examples would now remain intact. The famous “shell houses” of Arthur Pickford at Ballarat and Albert Robertson at Phillip Island are both no longer extant. Existing Listings AHC National Trust Local HO schedule Local Heritage Study heritage ALLIANCE 146 Job 2008-07 Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria Identifier House Other name Reeve House (former) 027-088 Address 21a Green Gully Road Group 027 Residential Building (Private) KEILOR Category 472 House LGA City of Brimbank Date/s 1955-60 Designer/s Fritz Janeba NO IMAGE AVAILABLE Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Significance Architectural; References One of few known post-war commissions of this Austrian émigré, who was an influential teacher within Melbourne University’s School of Architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Mornington Peninsula Heritage Review Significant Place Citations
    Attachment 4.2 Mornington Peninsula Heritage Review Area 1 – Mount Eliza, Mornington, Mount Martha Significant Place Citations December 2013 Mount Eliza Mornington Mount Martha Mornington Peninsula Shire Council With Context Pty Ltd, Heritage Intelligence Pty Ltd, Built Heritage Pty Ltd Attachment 4.2 20 Mornington Peninsula Shire, 2013 Mornington Peninsula Shire: Simon Lloyd – Heritage planner and project manager Rosalyn Franklin – for administrative supervision, mapping, policy development Lorraine Strong – obtaining information from building records Lorraine Huddle – Mornington Peninsula Shire Heritage Adviser Ana Borovic – for assistance with mapping and heritage database Dylan Toomey – for survey work and photography Nicholas Robinson, Kayla Cartledge, Jane Conway, Liam Renaut for administrative support Helen Bishop for proofreading the Thematic History Phil Thomas for preparation of local policies. Context Pty Ltd Project Team: Louise Honman Director David Helms Senior Consultant Natica Schmeder Senior Consultant Annabel Neylon Senior Consultant Ian Travers Senior Consultant Jessie Briggs Consultant. Built Heritage Pty Ltd - Project team: Simon Reeves, Director. Heritage Intelligence Pty Ltd - Project Team: Lorraine Huddle, Director. Additional research by Graeme Butler and Associates: Graeme Butler, Director. Attachment 4.2 Individual Places 35-37 Barkly Street, Mornington ...................................................................................................................... 7 28 Bath Street Mornington
    [Show full text]