DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rise and Fall of the Canadian Wheat Board. Bill Miner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rise and Fall of the Canadian Wheat Board. Bill Miner The Rise and Fall of Canadian Wheat Board CAES Fellows Paper 2015-2 William M. Miner The Rise and Fall of the Canadian Wheat Board by William M. Miner INTRODUCTIONi The Canadian Wheat Board was a product of the circumstances and events that shaped the grain sector of Western Canada. In the early decades of settlement of the Prairie region neither producers nor governments advocated a central selling agency for marketing grain produced in the New West, nor for any other commodity. Laissez faire, personal freedoms and open markets were the order of the new frontier. The pioneers did lobby governments to provide assistance in developing the basic infrastructure to enable them to produce and market grain, particularly access to rail, country and terminal elevators and foreign markets. They also pursued and gained a rules framework for the grain trade to provide legal, equitable and orderly access to markets. But it was regulatory and financial assistance that producers demanded and not direct intervention in the production and marketing of farm products. Likewise governments, federal and provincial, worked to create rail infrastructure and an economic framework to stimulate settlement, agricultural production, trade and commerce. The emphasis was on facilitating farm and private sector activity rather than direct government intervention. The Federal government did provide significant financial assistance to open the prairie region for settlement and trade, active immigration and rail construction programs with subsidies, land grants and Ministerial leadership. In return settlers were required to break the sod for cultivation, and railways agreed to the regulation of rates. While grain regulation preceded Western settlement and the first federal grain inspection act was passed in 1874 (C. Wilson 1978), these early regulations were consolidated in the Canada Grain Act of 1912. This Act represented the first principle step in regulating the industry under a Board of Grain Supervisors. It responded to over a decade of producer grievances and protests, and amendments to earlier regulations with respect to grading, weighing, handling and transporting grain. Producers also pressed the Federal government for grain terminals and the construction and ownership of country elevators but with only limited response. Private (line) elevator companies and eventually farm cooperative organizations developed the elevator system largely on their own. The Federal government did accept the leadership role in agricultural research by establishing the Dominion Experimental Farm Stations Act, 1886. The result was a healthy, expanding grain sector on the Canadian prairies by 1914. Two World Wars and an intervening market crash followed by a severe depression forced successive Governments to directly intervene in grain marketing and create a mechanism for this purpose – the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB). It operated initially on a voluntary basis and only in abnormal market circumstances since both Governments and most producers advocated free trade and individual choice. Grain exchanges existed in Canada and the United States (U.S.) providing for cash and futures trading, and farm organizations found alternative ways to market grain through “pooling” to share the risk and ensure an orderly flow to export points.ii There were international efforts to negotiate agreements to reduce trade barriers and coordinate grain policies to balance supply with demand and achieve equitable pricing. But rising farm productivity, driven by mechanization, new grain varieties and suitable farming methods, combined with policies of self-sufficiency and border control, led to persistent over-supply of wheat and marketing problems. Poverty and hunger existed in many developing countries and occasional food scarcity issues complicated the search for international solutions. Trade and 1 commodity agreements provided limited relief and gradually most governments, excepting in state-controlled economies, retreated from directly intervening in grain marketing. This is the story of the rise and fall of the CWB as the industry and the world around it evolved and changed. FIRST WORLD WAR The outbreak of the Great War in 1914 quickly altered the laissez-faire approach of governments in Canada, the United States, Australia and Britain, the latter being Canada’s major market for wheat. It also fed the emerging pressures from Western Canadian farm organizations for greater government involvement in grain handling and marketing. Canada and Australia were still in semi-colonial status. Britain established wartime control over the movement of wheat coming from the former colonies as they retained foreign affairs responsibilities for the Commonwealth. The Canadian West had surplus wheat supplies but was prevented from offering them freely under wartime control, and sales were being lost to U.S. and other exporters. As Britain began direct government purchasing from Canada and Australia, and urged their former colonies to create boards with powers to fix prices and distribution, the Canadian government turned to the Board of Grain Supervisors to set prices and regulate trade. Britain backed away from a commitment to take all of Canada’s surplus grain, so the Board’s powers were broadened to create a marketing board (C. Wilson 1978). This set the stage for the creation of the Canadian Wheat Board although it was not the Conservative Government’s intention to establish a permanent institution. The Winnipeg Grain Exchange (WGE) had terminated futures trading under wartime restrictions but the private trade, governments, and farm organizations expected to return to business as normal following the War. The circumstances of wartime control of grain distribution and food supplies also planted the seeds for international cooperation in grain marketing. Towards the end of the War, the allies, Britain, France, Italy and the U.S., agreed in 1918 to coordinate food policy and procurement. This continued in the intermediate post-war period as part of the allies supply and relief activities under the Peace Settlement. The U.S. formed a corporation with Government direction to handle surplus wheat. The first wheat board in Canada was established in 1919 under the War Measures Act. Although futures trading had been resumed in both countries, uncertainty over de-control in Europe, the need for credit, and market instability, forced the closure of futures trading. It is interesting the WGE asked the Canadian Government to take control of wheat marketing to “rescue” the futures market in those circumstances. As in the organization of the Board of Grain Supervisors, the members of the CWB were appointed from the grain industry and served on an honorary basis. The CWB of 1919 provided initial advances on grain deliveries, sales at the best price and distribution of final earnings through participation certificates. This followed similar arrangements set up in Australia and the U.S. during the War. Initial payments for wheat were also established for Ontario, Quebec and B.C. but government statements made it clear that the Board was a temporary arrangement and the marketing of wheat would be returned to the usual and normal methods of the pre-War period (C. Wilson 1978). The 1919 legislation made provision for the Government to continue the Board by proclamation in emergencies. The Board’s handling of the crop resulted in a final result above expectations and stimulated pressure from some farm organizations to continue its operations. This resulted in the Canadian Wheat Board Act of 1920 providing for its resumption by proclamation. Futures 2 trading for the 1920 crop had resumed in Chicago and open marketing returned in July to Canada as well. THE FOLLOWING DECADE Although the early 1920s was a period of general economic prosperity and favorable harvests in Western Canada, wheat prices steadily declined after a brief rally from sales of high quality wheat to U.S. millers. This stimulated strong representations from producer organizations for reinstatement of voluntary Board marketing. A major public debate ensued over the merits or otherwise of the central marketing of grain. It coincided with an election in 1921 and a minority Liberal administration replaced the Conservatives. The policy of the new government on the methods of marketing grain was similar to that of the outgoing administration, both opposed to direct involvement of the market except in unusual circumstances. On a global basis there was also a major debate over direct government involvement in economies, contrasting the socialist or communist policies with an open market, laissez-faire, entrepreneurial system. But a new National Progressive Party, spearheaded by Western farm organizations, had achieved a significant standing in the Canadian Parliament, and demanded tariff reductions to lower import costs and the re-establishment of the CWB on a voluntary basis. In addition, there was also the question of whether the compulsory control of grain marketing was constitutional. Legal experts considered Federal powers could not deny freedom of contract and the capacity to buy and sell, or exercise proprietary rights, but could regulate conditions of export and foreign relations (C. Wilson 1978). By the early 1920s producers had created their own cooperative elevator system to compete with the private line companies. The Progressives had failed to achieve neither their tariff reduction goals nor a continuation of a wheat board. Due to promises in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Wheat
    Canadian Wheat By: J. E. Dexter1, K.R. Preston1 and N. J. Woodbeck2 Chapter 6: Future of flour a compendium of flour improvement, 2006, pg - 43-62 Edited by Lutz Popper, Wermer Schafer and Walter Freund. Agrimedia, Bergen. Dunne, Germany. 1 Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory, 1404-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada 2 Canadian Grain Commission, Industry Services, 900-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada Introduction The vast majority of Canadian wheat is produced in western Canada (Manitoba and provinces to the west). A high proportion of western Canadian wheat is exported, and it is marketed in a highly regulated fashion. As soon as western Canadian wheat is delivered by producers to a grain elevator the wheat becomes the property of the Canadian Wheat Board, which is a single desk seller for western Canadian wheat. Approval for registration into any of the eight classes of wheat in western Canada is based on merit according to disease resistance, agronomic performance and processing quality. Wheat is also produced in eastern Canada, primarily in southern Ontario. Eastern Canadian wheat is also registered on the basis of merit, although processing quality models are not quite as strictly defined as for western Canada. There is no single desk seller for eastern Canadian wheat. Eastern Canadian wheat is marketed by private trading companies and the Ontario Wheat Producers Marketing Board. Approximately 50% of eastern Canadian wheat disappears domestically. The Canadian Grain Commission (CGC), a Department within Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada (AAFC), oversees quality assurance of Canadian grains, oilseeds, pulses and special crops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Wheat Board, Warburtons, and the Creative
    The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re- constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history by André J. R. Magnan A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto © Copyright by André Magnan 2010. Abstract Title: The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re-constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history Author: André J. R. Magnan Submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto, 2010. This dissertation traces the historical transformation of the Canada-UK commodity chain for wheat-bread as a lens on processes of local and global change in agrofood relations. During the 1990s, the Canadian Wheat Board (Canada‟s monopoly wheat seller) and Warburtons, a British bakery, pioneered an innovative identity- preserved sourcing relationship that ties contracted prairie farmers to consumers of premium bread in the UK. Emblematic of the increasing importance of quality claims, traceability, and private standards in the reorganization of agrifood supply chains, I argue that the changes of the 1990s cannot be understood outside of historical legacies giving shape to unique institutions for regulating agrofood relations on the Canadian prairies and in the UK food sector. I trace the rise, fall, and re-invention of the Canada-UK commodity chain across successive food regimes, examining the changing significance of wheat- bread, inter-state relations between Canada, the UK, and the US, and public and private forms of agrofood regulation over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Farmers Fight the Logic of Market Choice in GM Wheat
    Let the Market Decide? Canadian Farmers Fight the Logic of Market Choice in GM Wheat Emily Eaton1 University of Regina: Department of Geography Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the controversy that surrounded Monsanto’s attempt to commercialize genetically engineered Roundup Ready (RR) wheat in Canada in the early 2000s. Specifically, the paper interrogates the argument made by RR wheat proponents that the fate of RR wheat should be decided in the marketplace according to individual choice. To counter the common-sense notion of the right of consumers and producers to market choice, anti-RR wheat activists, led by agricultural producers, advanced notions of collective action. They argued that markets offered a very narrow set of choices and that once introduced into agricultural systems, RR wheat threatened already existing agronomic practices and export markets. The paper argues that the “let the markets decide” approach denies the common positionality of farmers as producers of food and forecloses a politics of production. Similarly, in the realm of consumption, agency beyond individual self-interest is rendered unthinkable. Keywords: market choice, subjectivity, neoliberalism, genetic modification 1 Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Canadian farmers fight the logic of market choice in GM wheat 108 Introduction [T]here’s a lot of debate on how much benefit local farmers have had ... in using [GM] Canola for example. Saskatchewan farmers, well they’ve readily adopted that technology right? And they have the choice. They don’t have to pay for that seed, they don’t have to use that technology, but they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada
    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aboriginal Justice Inquiry-Child Welfare Initiative in Manitoba
    The Aboriginal Justice Inquiry-Child Welfare Initiative in Manitoba: A study of the process and outcomes for Indigenous families and communities from a front line perspective by Gwendolyn M Gosek MSW, University of Manitoba, 2002 BA, University of Manitoba, 2002 BSW, University of Manitoba, 1991 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the School of Social Work © Gwendolyn M Gosek, 2017 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The Aboriginal Justice Inquiry-Child Welfare Initiative in Manitoba: A study of the process and outcomes for Indigenous families and communities from a front line perspective By Gwendolyn M Gosek MSW, University of Manitoba, 2002 BA, University of Manitoba, 2002 BSW, University of Manitoba, 1991 Supervisory Committee Dr. Leslie Brown, School of Social Work Supervisor Dr. Jeannine Carrière, School of Social Work Departmental Member Dr. Susan Strega, School of Social Work Departmental Member Dr. Sandrina de Finney, School of Child and Youth Care Outside Member iii Abstract As the number of Indigenous children and youth in the care of Manitoba child welfare steadily increases, so do the questions and public debates. The loss of children from Indigenous communities due to residential schools and later on, to child welfare, has been occurring for well over a century and Indigenous people have been continuously grieving and protesting this forced removal of their children. In 1999, when the Manitoba government announced their intention to work with Indigenous peoples to expand off-reserve child welfare jurisdiction for First Nations, establish a provincial Métis mandate and restructure the existing child care system through legislative and other changes, Indigenous people across the province celebrated it as an opportunity for meaningful change for families and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Grain, Flour and Ships – the Wheat Trade in Portland, Oregon
    Grain, Flour and Ships The Wheat Trade in Portland, Oregon Postcard Views of the Oregon Grain Industry, c1900 Prepared for Prosper Portland In Partial Fulfillment of the Centennial Mills Removal Project Under Agreement with the Oregon SHPO and the USACE George Kramer, M.S., HP Sr. Historic Preservation Specialist Heritage Research Associates, Inc. Eugene, Oregon April 2019 GRAIN, FLOUR AND SHIPS: THE WHEAT TRADE IN PORTLAND, OREGON By George Kramer Prepared for Prosper Portland 222 NW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97209 Heritage Research Associates, Inc. 1997 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97403 April 2019 HERITAGE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES REPORT NO. 448 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. Historic Overview – Grain and Flour in Portland .............................................................. 4 Growing and Harvesting 4 Transporting Grain to Portland ................................................................................... 6 Exporting from Portland ............................................................................................. 8 Flour Mills .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Official” Languages of Work: Explaining the Persistence of Inequitable Access to French As a Language of Work in the Canadian Federal Public Service
    Two “Official” Languages of Work: Explaining the Persistence of Inequitable Access to French as a Language of Work in the Canadian Federal Public Service Helaina Gaspard Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Post-Doctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree in Political Studies School of Political Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Helaina Gaspard, Ottawa, Canada, 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................... ii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ vi Chapter 1: Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 Project Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2:Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................... 12 Part I: Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 13 The Politics of Language ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Quality of US Grain for International
    Chapter 5 The Changing Role of . Contents Page Quality in the Market Place . 89 Changing Nature of Markets–A Case Study in Wheat. 91 Background 91 Product Consumption and Wheat Importation . 91 The Dynamics of the Wheat Market. 93 Analysis Results . 93 Case Study Summary . 98 Chapter 5 References . 99 Tables Table Page 5-1. Export Classes of Wheat Categorized by Characteristics and Country of Origin ● . .... ... ● . ..,..0.. 92 5-2. Required Protein Levels for Wheat-Based End Products and Protein Content of U.S. Wheat Classes. 92 5-3, Regional Tastes, Preferences, and the Requirements for Wheat-Based End Products . 93 5-4, Wheat Consumption in Selected Countries, 1984/85 . 94 5-5. Market Shares of Imported Wheat Classes, 1984/85. 95 5-6. Correlation of Imported Wheat Class Market Shares, Income, and Domestic Wheat Production, 1984/85 . 96 5-7. Average Growth Rates of Wheat Class imports by Country, Region, and World, 1961/62-84/85 ● ****.. .**.*.** ● **..*.. ● ******. ● *,.,..* * 97 5-8. Simulated Changes in Wheat Class Market Shares, 1985/95 . 98 Chapter 5 The quality concerns of each industry using The varying quality requirements exhibited wheat, corn, and soybeans are identified in by these industries, especially for wheat, high- chapter 4. Wheat, by its very nature, is the most light the need for the United States to become complex of the three grains in terms of defin- more aware of individual industry require- ing quality because of the vast array of prod- ments if the goal is to produce and deliver high- ucts and processing technologies involved. quality grain, The Nation has developed the Quality requirements differ not only by type reputation as a consistent supplier for any type and individual product, but between mills using and quality of grain desired; to become a sup- the same type wheat to produce flour for the plier of high-quality grains, it must become same type of product.
    [Show full text]
  • 1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863
    BONUS : Paintings together with their year of completion. (A) 1863 (B) 1866 (C) circa 1510 Vancouver Estival Trivia Open, 2012, FARSIDE team BONUS : Federal cabinet ministers, 1940 to 1990 (A) (B) (C) (D) Norman Rogers James Ralston Ernest Lapointe Joseph-Enoil Michaud James Ralston Mackenzie King James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent 1940s Andrew McNaughton 1940s Douglas Abbott Louis St. Laurent James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent Brooke Claxton Douglas Abbott Lester Pearson Stuart Garson 1950s 1950s Ralph Campney Walter Harris John Diefenbaker George Pearkes Sidney Smith Davie Fulton Donald Fleming Douglas Harkness Howard Green Donald Fleming George Nowlan Gordon Churchill Lionel Chevrier Guy Favreau Walter Gordon 1960s Paul Hellyer 1960s Paul Martin Lucien Cardin Mitchell Sharp Pierre Trudeau Leo Cadieux John Turner Edgar Benson Donald Macdonald Mitchell Sharp Edgar Benson Otto Lang John Turner James Richardson 1970s Allan MacEachen 1970s Ron Basford Donald Macdonald Don Jamieson Barney Danson Otto Lang Jean Chretien Allan McKinnon Flora MacDonald JacquesMarc Lalonde Flynn John Crosbie Gilles Lamontagne Mark MacGuigan Jean Chretien Allan MacEachen JeanJacques Blais Allan MacEachen Mark MacGuigan Marc Lalonde Robert Coates Jean Chretien Donald Johnston 1980s Erik Nielsen John Crosbie 1980s Perrin Beatty Joe Clark Ray Hnatyshyn Michael Wilson Bill McKnight Doug Lewis BONUS : Name these plays by Oscar Wilde, for 10 points each. You have 30 seconds. (A) THE PAGE OF HERODIAS: Look at the moon! How strange the moon seems! She is like a woman rising from a tomb. She is like a dead woman. You would fancy she was looking for dead things. THE YOUNG SYRIAN: She has a strange look.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash Landing: Citizens, the State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976
    Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976 ii Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976 By Michael Rowan, B.A., M.A. Supervisor: Dr. Ken Cruikshank Committee Members: Dr. Richard Harris, Dr. John Weaver, Dr. Penny Bryden A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Michael Rowan, January 2019. iii McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2018) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968-1976 AUTHOR: Michael Rowan, B.A. (York University), M.A. (York University) PROFESSOR: Ken Cruikshank NUMBER OF PAGES 206 iv Abstract During the 1960s both the federal and provincial governments continued to take on new and larger responsibilities. During this same time period citizens began to mobilize and challenge the state on a number of social issues including race, gender, labour, urban sprawl and the environment. Citizens believed that not only did they have the right to challenge the authority of government in planning public policy, but they also had a right to participate in the decision- making process as much as any bureaucrat, expert, or elected official. In planning airports in Pickering, Ste. Scholastique and Sea Island, the federal government was opposed by citizen groups in each of these three cases. Citizens believed their voices were not being heard and that government officials did not respect them. As a result, they disrupted the meticulously laid out plans of elected officials and policy planners by drawing on evidence and expert advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Reciprocal Access in US/Canadian Grain Trade Background Issues for the US Grain Trade
    AE 98001 January 1998 Reciprocal Access in U.S./Canadian Grain Trade Background Issues for the U.S. Grain Trade* William W. Wilson and Bruce L. Dahl ** *Special paper prepared at the request of the USDA/FAS for discussion. **Professor and Research Scientist, Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo. Acknowledgments Constructive comments on this and earlier drafts were received from our colleagues, Demcey Johnson, Won Koo, George Flaskerud, Graham Parsons, Organization for Western European Cooperation (OWEC), and Frank Gomme (USDA). However, errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. NOTICE: The analyses and views reported in this paper are those of the author. They are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Agricultural Economics or by North Dakota State University. North Dakota State University is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. Information on other titles in this series may be obtained from: Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 5636, Fargo, ND 58105. Telephone: 701-231-7441, Fax: 701-231-7400, or e-mail: [email protected]. Copyright © 1998 by William W. Wilson and Bruce L. Dahl. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to review past trade relations in the grains sector between the United States and Canada and to document trade barriers and the potential for the evolution of reciprocal trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Accession No. 1986/428
    -1- Liberal Party of Canada MG 28 IV 3 Finding Aid No. 655 ACCESSION NO. 1986/428 Box No. File Description Dates Research Bureau 1567 Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - British Columbia, Vol. I July 1981 Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - Saskatchewan, Vol. I and Sept. 1981 II Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - Alberta, Vol. II May 20, 1981 1568 Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - Manitoba, Vols. II and III 1981 Liberal caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - British Columbia, Vol. IV 1981 Elections & Executive Minutes 1569 Minutes of LPC National Executive Meetings Apr. 29, 1979 to Apr. 13, 1980 Poll by poll results of October 1978 By-Elections Candidates' Lists, General Elections May 22, 1979 and Feb. 18, 1980 Minutes of LPC National Executive Meetings June-Dec. 1981 1984 General Election: Positions on issues plus questions and answers (statements by John N. Turner, Leader). 1570 Women's Issues - 1979 General Election 1979 Nova Scotia Constituency Manual Mar. 1984 Analysis of Election Contribution - PEI & Quebec 1980 Liberal Government Anti-Inflation Controls and Post-Controls Anti-Inflation Program 2 LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA MG 28, IV 3 Box No. File Description Dates Correspondence from Senator Al Graham, President of LPC to key Liberals 1978 - May 1979 LPC National Office Meetings Jan. 1976 to April 1977 1571 Liberal Party of Newfoundland and Labrador St. John's West (Nfld) Riding Profiles St. John's East (Nfld) Riding Profiles Burin St. George's (Nfld) Riding Profiles Humber Port-au-Port-St.
    [Show full text]