China's World: Philippines Looks to Revive U.S. Naval Base Manila Looks to Subic Bay to Counter Chinese Moves in Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

China's World: Philippines Looks to Revive U.S. Naval Base Manila Looks to Subic Bay to Counter Chinese Moves in Region China's World: Philippines Looks to Revive U.S. Naval Base Manila Looks to Subic Bay to Counter Chinese Moves in Region SUBIC BAY, Philippines—In 1991, after the Philippine Senate voted to close Subic Naval Base—then the largest American overseas military facility—an emotional Sen. Agapito Aquino summed up the popular mood. It was, he said, "the dawn of our nation's birth." Filipino spectators watched the USS Belleau Wood leave Cubi Point as it carried the last group of U.S. marines from Subic Bay Naval Base to Okinawa in November 1992. Tossing out the Americans from Subic and nearby Clark Air Base, he added, had ended the country's "crippling dependence" on its former colonial overlord. Now, the Philippines wants American forces back in Subic to counter Chinese moves off the Philippine coast. Just west of Subic, Chinese ships have fenced off the Scarborough Shoal, one of the world's richest fishing grounds, which falls within the Philippines's 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone. This month, Manila also produced evidence that suggested China is preparing to build permanent structures on Scarborough, as it has done on other rocky outcrops in the South China Sea. To the south, Chinese paramilitary vessels have chased away oil survey ships along the gas-rich Reed Bank, also claimed by Manila. China has offered joint exploration for oil and gas off the Philippines, and denies it's getting ready to build structures on Scarborough. But the Philippines feels bullied—and defenseless. Fear of China is trumping nationalism. And negotiations on bringing U.S. forces back to Subic, and other spots around the Philippines, are under way. As a practical matter, the Americans could come back to Subic tomorrow. The Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority, which now runs Subic as a free port, has preserved the corrugated steel- roofed quonset huts that once housed American enlisted personnel. The officers' homes—sturdy, breeze block structures with balcony views over the harbor—are available for rent. Some of them have been refurbished by Korean businessmen and other investors in the area's shipbuilding and electronics industries. The Subic airport has plenty of spare capacity. Its runway, long enough for bombers to rumble down, now handles mainly corporate jets and recreational aircraft. The piers where American aircraft carriers once tied up are largely empty, although a nearby boat club is filled with luxury yachts owned by Hong Kong millionaires who jet in for weekends. But bringing back the once-spurned Yanks won't be so simple. The reasons illustrate the way that China's rapid rise as a regional military power—one that now possesses fleets of modern warships, nuclear-powered submarines, ballistic missiles and stealth fighters—has reshaped the calculus for Pentagon planners in Asia since that vote to eject the American forces. For a start, the Philippines itself would have to reverse a constitutional ban on allowing a foreign power to establish a permanent military base. But assuming that was possible, America still wouldn't be interested. Bases are potential sitting ducks for Chinese missiles. Plus, they are expensive. At a time of budget cuts, it's far cheaper to sign a treaty with friendly countries guaranteeing access for U.S. forces than to pay rent. In military-speak, America wants "places not bases." As important, U.S. military moves in Asia now must be weighed against the risk of provoking China at a time when tensions over territorial claims in the South China Sea are running high. China's claims to almost the entire stretch of water, along with its islets, reefs and sandbanks, are contested not just by the Philippines but also Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan. Washington doesn't take a position on the sovereignty claims, but the danger is that it could get caught up in any hostilities, dragging the U.S. military into direct conflict with nuclear-armed China. Nor do Asian countries want to be forced to take sides between China and the U.S. The U.S. is cautious about offending China for other reasons, too. China already feels encircled by a network of U.S. military alliances stretching from Japan to Australia. As numerous analysts have pointed out, China isn't the Soviet Union. It may be pushing back against U.S. military hegemony in Asia, but unlike the Soviet Union it's also an economic partner—America's biggest creditor and a key investment destination for U.S. auto companies, retailers and plane makers. So what do the Philippines and the U.S. have to talk about? Roberto Garcia, the chairman of the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority, says one proposal is to place a Philippine Air Force fighter wing at the airport, providing a base that could be used by the U.S. Air Force. Subic already hosts Philippine naval vessels, and U.S. Navy ships have restricted access. That access will likely be expanded. Washington also has provided two 1960s-vintage decommissioned U.S. Coast Guard cutters that use Subic as their home base. They are hardly state of the art—"hand-me-downs," grumbles Aquilino "Nene" Pimentel, the former president of the Philippine Senate—but the Gregorio del Pinar and the Ramon Alcaraz are now the flagships of the Philippine Navy, alongside World War II-era patrol boats. The two countries have a mutual defense treaty, and U.S. forces are helping the Philippines defeat a Muslim insurgency in the southern island of Mindanao. But the go-go days of Subic as a bustling base seem destined for the mists of Cold War history, regardless of what agreements the Philippines and the U.S. reach in their current talks. Mitch Schranz, a now-retired U.S. military chaplain who was one of the last Americans to leave Subic, and then moved back to raise a family with his Filipina wife, recalls the raucous celebrations when aircraft carrier battle groups used to sail in after months at sea, disgorging several thousand sailors into the all-night honky-tonk bars of nearby Olongapo. "It was like the Fourth of July, New Year's Eve and Mardi Gras all rolled into one," he says. For some of the romantic liaisons born from those wild nights, Subic ran a Bride School that tutored Filipinas in the ways of American domestic life, including how to use a pop-up toaster, he recalls. The Americans employed as many as 30,000 locals, including skilled welders and pipe fitters. High-paid jobs were handed down from father to son. Elite workers formed their own bowling leagues on base. When Subic closed "there was a collective depression," said Mr. Schranz. "After 100 years— poof—the place was gone" .
Recommended publications
  • MCRP 3-31B Rev. 2000
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MCRP 3-31B Amphibious Ships and Landing Craft Data Book Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com U.S. Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, DC 20380-0001 1 October 2000 FOREWORD 1. PURPOSE Marine Corps Reference Paper (MCRP) 3-31B, Amphibious Ships and Landing Craft Data Book, is for use in planning where generalized capabilities and measurements are required. In planning for operations where exact capabilities and figures are required, the individual ship's loading characteristics pamphlet (SLCP) must be consulted. 2. SCOPE The information contained in this MCRP was obtained from the individual SLCPs and from the Naval Sea Systems Command. The data is based on class averages. No broken stowage factors have been applied to square footage in embarked landing craft. 3. SUPPRESSION None. 4. CHANGES Recommendations for improvements to this publication are encouraged from commands as well as from individuals. Forward suggestions using the User Suggestion Form format to: Commanding General Doctrine Division (C 42) Marine Corps Combat Development Command 2042 Broadway Street Suite 210 Quantico, VA 22134-5021 5. CERTIFICATION Reviewed and approved this date. BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS Major General, U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Commander for Warfighting Marine Corps Combat Development Command Quantico, Virginia DISTRIBUTION: 140 011800 00 i Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com User Suggestion Form From: To: Commanding Officer, Doctrine Division (C 42), Marine Corps Combat Development Command, 2042 Broadway Street Suite 210, Quantico, Virginia 22134-5021 Subj: RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING MCRP 3-31B, AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS AND LANDING CRAFT DATA BOOK 1.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Bay Squadrons Rescue Kailua Men Cpl
    INSIDE Sgt. Maj.'s Column A-2 Mail A-3 Simmsc Fmployment A-3 I1M11-363 A-4 'British Roval Mmines A-5 MarForPac A-6 Iron Man A-7 FCAr A-8 PeeWet.. Foot hill I 11-1 MCCS 13-2 Football 11-3 Movies/ AcIs Volume 29, Number 41 www.mebli.ustric.mil October 12, 2000 K-Bay squadrons rescue Kailua men Cpl. Roman Yurek Combat Correspomient After running out of fuel and drifting at sea for nearly four days, ,Kailua residents Tom Zelko, fan Buscher and their dog Lucky were spotted by Patrol Squadron 9 (VP-9) and rescued from their I 5-foot Boston Whaler boat, by Anti-submarine Squadron Light 37 HSL-37 Oct. 4. The two men and their dog planned a trip to Molokai Oct. 1, and back that was supposed to take four hours, but their wives grew concerned when the boat didn't return that afternoon. photo courtnny of I-151,17 Fnny RIrlorm The Coast Guard had a C-130 "Hercules" searching the An aerial photo shows the Kallua residents and Lucky, shortly after rescue diver Petty Officer 3rd Class Chris Haddy waters trying to locate the missing boat from Oct. 1, to Oct.3. boarded their Boston Whaler. Shown beside them are the life rafts thrown to them earlier in the afternoon. On Oct: 3, VP-9, from MCB Hawaii, Kaneohe Bay, joined the search. The following day, the VP-9 P-3C "Orion" aircraft spot- Prior to the arrival of the SH-60 "Seahawk," the P-3C location of the boat, where rescue diver Petty Officer 3rd Class, ted the boat near Kauai.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Conditions Marines BELLOWS AIR Training Area Near Electricity' Was in a Relatively Small the ACTUAL Test Variety of 'Situations FORCE STATION, Waimanalo
    HAWAIIVoluntary payment r- for delivery to MCASMARINE housing/41 per four week period VOL. 10 NO. KANEOHE BAY, HAWAII, MARCH 4, 1981 TWENTY PAGES, pt44 Rov-i:e4v Operation conditions Marines BELLOWS AIR training area near Electricity' was in a relatively small THE ACTUAL test variety of 'situations FORCE STATION, Waimanalo. Several generated for lighting trailer-like Hawaii, box. The of combat efficiency such as they Would, Security Feb. 26 - conditioning hikes held and a variety of center processed the took place Thursday. guard detachment Eight months ago I handle in an actual in previous weeks had services requiring vast amount of paper- Beginning at 8 a.m., tactical situation. wanted to take Head- prepared well the power. One such service work passed through QUANTICO Va.-The Marine quarters Operation Poi Pounder Emanating from, a Security Guard Tehran Company, servicemen and women was a portable repro- and out of a brigade- 1-81 Detachment returned here this Brigade to the field. I presented head- Tactical Exercise week. for the trek which was duction center housed size headquarters. quarters sections with The nine Marine security guards, held hostage for 444 was told there were a lot made in good time with a cont. on A-8 days, were recognized at a graduation ceremony for MSG of problems. We'rehere. not one member drop- Class 2-81, Friday at 11 a.m. in the Little Hall Auditorium in Eight weeks ago I ping out. Quantico. wanted Headquarters Upon arrival at Welcomed back by their fellow Marines were SSgt Michael Company, Brigade to Bellows, the headquar- Moeller and Sergeants William Gallegos, Kevin Hermening, walk to the CPX at ters personnel moved Steven Kirtley, Paul Lewis, James Lopez, John McKeel, Bellows.
    [Show full text]
  • Can East Timor Be a Blueprint for Burden Sharing?
    David Dickens Can East Timor Be a Blueprint for Burden Sharing? Should the United States turn over leadership of responses to re- gional conflicts to reliable allies?1 The United States underpins the security and stability of Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and the Middle East. In ad- dition, the protection of its own sovereignty since September 11 has become more demanding. These are weighty burdens. The United States may not be stretched too far, but it is limited in what it can achieve without weakening existing commitments. How much attention can Washington spare to man- age crises in places of secondary strategic interest (realistically, the Southern Hemisphere, including all of Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America), especially where allies and friends have much better local knowledge? The international intervention in East Timor, led by Australia, may serve as a model for how the United States can turn over leadership of regional interventions to reliable allies. Australia led the operation, and the United States supported it. Australia and coalition partners provided ground troops while the United States gave intelligence, planning, transport, logistics, and communication support. Referring to Indonesia, U.S. secretary of state Colin Powell has talked about “let[ting] our ally Australia take the lead as they have done so well.” He said that the United States would prefer to let regional allies deal with regional security problems “rather than [the United States] feeling it has to respond to every [call] that’s out there.”2 Former U.S. assistant secretary of state for East Asia Stanley Roth commented in testimony to the Senate that East Timor was a “role model about how na- tions can take the lead in responding to crises in their own region.”3 David Dickens is director of the Centre for Strategic Studies at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • ~:1-- ~ NO;W WIDCH WAY? - Si'!Ortly After Landing Ashore, Lance Corporal I F!!Loto by Sgt
    'January 26, 1979 KNIGJITS SHINE ON LHA - CH-46 Sea Knight helicopters fro10 Composite Marine and ·stories .about the 35th Marine Amphibious Unit (MA U) Combat Readiness Evaluation Medium Helicopter Squadron (HMH)-262 embark day and n!ght from the flight deck of the (CRE) exercise bel~ ab Barking Sands on ·Kauai, see pages 5-9. · USS Belleau Wood (LHA-3) during Exercise "CREE Victory" last week. For additional.photos -""' ,. > ~:1-- ~ NO;w WIDCH WAY? - Si'!ortly after landing ashore, Lance Corporal I f!!loto by Sgt. Phil s-•tt Redd Lanier, a Weapons Platoon squad leader with "Echo" Company, "CENTER BEA.CH"- Shore Party Marines erect a Sho.r.e Party is responsible for the beach organization ,shoots an azimuth to evaluate the correct direction of his next moye. red flag to d;!lignate this area as "Center Beach." The operations. See page 9 for story and photos. · --- --· · -- • -- Page 2, Hawaii Marine, January 26, 1979 Prayer ,.-N-a..,.._v_y_L_e_a_g_u_e_A_w_a_rd_d_e_a_d-1-.in-e-n-ea- . r-s Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard commanders in Hawaii have Award, the Admir~l Claude V. Ricketts Award, the General Gerald C. breakfast until February 19 to submit their nominations for the 1979 National Thomas Award, anti the Captain Winifred Q~ick Collins Award. Na_vy League Awards. Other awards are the Rear Admiral WilliamS. Parsons Aw11rd for According to the Secreta'ty o.fthe Navy, the National Navy League sCientific and technical progress, the Stephen Decatur Award for held of the United States awards provide an opportunity for all levels ot sea operational competence, the Alfred Thay~r Mahan Award for literary service commands to recognize military and civilian men ai;Jd women achievement, the Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Power Centre - Australia
    SEA POWER CENTRE - AUSTRALIA STRENGTH THROUGH DIVERSITY: THE COMBINED NAVAL ROLE IN OPERATION STABILISE Working Paper No. 20 David Stevens © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2007 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, and with standard source credit included, no part may be reproduced without written permission. Stevens, David 1958 – Published by the Sea Power Centre – Australia Department of Defence Canberra ACT 2600 ISSN 1834 7231 ISBN 978 0 642 29676 4 Disclaimer The views expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Australian Government, the Department of Defence and the Royal Australian Navy. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise for any statement made in this publication. Sea Power Centre – Australia The Sea Power Centre – Australia (SPC-A) was established to undertake activities to promote the study, discussion and awareness of maritime issues and strategy within the RAN and the Defence and civil communities at large. The mission of the SPC-A is: • to promote understanding of sea power and its application to the security of Australia’s national interests • to manage the development of RAN doctrine and facilitate its incorporation into ADF joint doctrine • to contribute to regional engagement • within the higher defence organisation, contribute to the development of maritime strategic concepts and strategic and
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 11 ▼JFQ FORUM Become Customer-Oriented Purveyors of Narrow NOTES Capabilities Rather Than Combat-Oriented Or- 1 Ganizations with a Broad Focus and an Under- U.S
    Warfare today is a thing of swift movement—of rapid concentrations. It requires the building up of enormous fire power against successive objectives with breathtaking speed. It is not a game for the unimaginative plodder. ...the truly great leader overcomes all difficulties, and campaigns and battles are nothing but a long series of difficulties to be overcome. — General George C. Marshall Fort Benning, Georgia September 18, 1941 Inaugural Issue JFQ CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by Colin L. Powell Introducing the Inaugural Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief JFQ FORUM JFQ Inaugural Issue The Services and Joint Warfare: 7 Four Views from the Top Projecting Strategic Land Combat Power 8 by Gordon R. Sullivan The Wave of the Future 13 by Frank B. Kelso II Complementary Capabilities from the Sea 17 by Carl E. Mundy, Jr. Ideas Count by Merrill A. McPeak JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY 22 JFQ Reforming Joint Doctrine Coalition Warfare What’s Ahead for the Armed Forces? by David E. Jeremiah Joint Warfare— Views from the Top 25 United Nations Peacekeeping The Limits of Jointness The Gulf War Service Redundancy: Waste or Hidden Capability? Revisited Joint Air Summer Operations 93 by Stephen Peter Rosen Inaugural Issue 36 Service Redundancy— Waste or Capability? A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL ABOUT THE COVER Reforming Joint Doctrine The cover shows USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, 40 by Robert A. Doughty passing through the Suez Canal during Opera- tion Desert Shield, a U.S. Navy photo by Frank A. Marquart. Photo credits for insets, from top United Nations Peacekeeping: Ends versus Means to bottom, are Schulzinger and Lombard (for 48 by William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2001
    S. HRG. 106–743 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON H.R. 4576/S. 2593 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 62–769 cc WASHINGTON : 2000 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HARRY REID, Nevada JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PATTY MURRAY, Washington BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JON KYL, Arizona STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H. ENGLISH, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina PETE V.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Cliff on Sprague (FFG 16) Lower the Ship’S Motor Whaleboat Into the I
    1 I. 1 an S- NOVEMBER 1994 NUMBER 931 L Sailors assignedto USS Cliff on Sprague (FFG 16) lower the ship’s motor whaleboat into the I OPERATIONS TRAINING 6 Burke-class: fleet-friendly 30 Virtual shipdriving 8 Future missile defense 32 1 st classes have the ,conn 10 Tomahawks on target, on time 34 The struggle to earn ESWS 12 USS Port Royal (CG 73) 36 Aegis Training Center respondsto fleet 14 Marines ... Forward from the sea 37 First women undergo Aegis training 18 USS Wasp (LHD 1) 38 Reserve ships exercise in Atlantic 20 Enlisted skippers 40 Prep0 ships pack punch 21 Precom duty-the right stuff 42 SWOS instructors excel 26 Sustain gives ships alift 44 Haze gray and fightingfit 46 On the surface- Who’s who’! 2 CHARTHOUSE 48 SHIPMATES On the Covers Front cower: USS Deyo (DD 989) and other battle group ships followed in the wakeUSS of George Washington (CVN 73) as they returnedto Norfolk earlier this year. (Photoby PHI (AW) Troy D. Summers) Back cower: 1994 Sailors of the Year. (Photos by PHC(AW) Joseph Dorey andPHI Dolores L. Anglin) Correction: The Navy celebrated 21its 9th birthday vice its21 8th as writ- ten in the October magazine. ed. I Cha~house ? 2 ALL HANDS Hispar ,,- . Asinn-1ent to increase Islander a Americt a Islander VADM Skip Bowman them aswe Specific details of the ac 1 pull out of the planwill be annc:ed - For the Record drawdown. By way of introduction, I’m proud We are to report as your head cheerleader - continuing a officially your new Chief of Naval Per- sonnel - “your” Chief of Naval Person- nel, because my job is to be your ad- vocate,yourspokesman in initiatibes.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibious Assault Ships for the 21St Century
    13.414 PROJECTS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION NAVAL SHIP DESIGN LHA(R): AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY LT ROBERT BEBERMEYER, USN LT KONSTANTINOS GALANIS, HN LT SHELLY PRICE, USN 30 MAY 2002 Executive Summary Amphibious assault ships such as the current LHA and LHD classes are an essential element of the country’s ability to exert influence anywhere in the world. The current amphibious assault ships represent the most capable amphibious ships in the world. The LHA 1 class ships are aging, however, with most reaching the end of their expected service lives between 2011 and 2015. It is not feasible to extend the service life of the LHA 1 class due to the rapid technological advances that have taken place during their lifetime. Most have already used their entire growth margin in areas such as combat systems and topside weights. The evolving combat systems and aircraft requirements will only exacerbate these matters. The best solution is to replace the LHA. As the US faces a future with uncertain threats, it is necessary to field a flexible force. In order to make the amphibious forces flexible, selective offload capability must be considered. This allows Marines to access the equipment and vehicles they need for any given operation at any time. A second change that adds a great deal of flexibility is the addition of more ships. Currently, an Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) consists of three ships, an LHA or LHD, an LSD, and an LPD. Replacing the LHA with two ships has several advantages, ranging from increasing the selective offload capability of the ARG to optimally distributing assets among the ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Stabilise: U.S
    Operation Stabilise: U.S. Joint Force Operations In East Timor CSC 2001 Subject Area Operations Table of Contents Page DISCLAIMER ......................................................................................................................... ..…III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................IV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.......................................................................................................... V PREFACE......................................................................................................................................VI PROLOGUE - SUPPORTED OR SUPPORTING.......................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1- BACKGROUND...................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 - STRATEGY AND POLICY FOR EAST TIMOR................................................ 10 CHAPTER 3 - OPERATIONAL PLANNING ............................................................................. 15 CHAPTER 4 - EXECUTING THE PLAN.................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 5 - A NEW PARADIGM............................................................................................ 30 CHAPTER 6 - THE FUTURE....................................................................................................... 35 CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]