The Private Ship General Mercer of Alexandria Pt. 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Private Ship General Mercer of Alexandria Pt. 1 Carlyle House July, 2008 D OCENT D ISPATCH Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority For Cause and Profit: The Private Ship General Mercer of Alexandria by Jim Bartlinski Part 1 of 2 From Massachusetts waters. A number of these vessels were built by the to Georgia the port’s master shipwrights. Two designs unique to economies of Great the Chesapeake region were the single-masted sloops Britain and Her and two-masted schooners, renowned for their speed. estranged American Although the majority of these distinctive sloops and colonies were schooners were built as merchantmen to navigate the undeniably tied to the high seas engaging in international and coastal trade, sea. The majority of during time of war they were quickly pressed into colonial America’s service as privateers by resourceful merchant - population was situated shippers like Carlyle, looking to recoup wartime in and around maritime losses. mercantile centers like As a prominent merchant -shipper, landowner and Boston, Providence, member of Virginia’s aristocracy, Colonel Carlyle Philadelphia, Baltimore, relied heavily on the transatlantic trade for his Alexandria, Charleston livelihood. His Most Christian Majesty George III’s New London, Conn. 1776 and Savannah. The Royal Navy that once protected America’s sources of revenue of the inhabitants of these ports and transatlantic trade, now made every effort to surrounding areas were likewise linked to the sea. The suppress it. The blockade of the Virginia capes, the profession that was the impetus behind the growth of Chesapeake, and the Potomac during the fight for these mercantile ports along British-America’s Eastern independence by Great Britain’s naval forces Seaboard was that of the merchant -shipper, particularly threatened the way of life that the Colonel and his ones like the wealthy and well connected Alexandria, peers had worked so hard to establish. Therefore, Virginia merchant, Colonel John Carlyle, formerly of many entrepreneurial ship owners, merchants, and Carlisle, England. private citizens alike turned to the time-honored As a successful seaport merchant, Colonel Carlyle practice of privateering. Privateering was not only a dominated Alexandrian society. He served as a trustee means by which to keep the economies of Britain’s of the port and contributed much to the early economic former American colonies afloat, but it was for success of his adopted hometown. From 1753, when a patriotic (if not opportunistic) citizens a way to wage thirty-three year old John Carlyle established residence an economic war against His Majesty’s Empire. in Alexandria to his death in 1780, the town’s harbor Privateering was a unique blend of profit and had developed into an active port, from which tobacco, patriotism. For centuries European powers regularly flour, and sundry other cargoes were shipped and issued documents known as “Letters of Marqué and imports of every kind brought in. Alexandria’s large crescent bay was crowded with vessels of every design that were owned, manned, and fitted out by merchant - CARLYLE HOUSE shippers like Carlyle. From Alexandria’s ropewalk came hundreds of miles of rope to hoist the sails made Mary Ruth Coleman, Director in the town’s sail lofts that propelled the shallops, Jim Bartlinski, Curator skiffs, ships, brigs, and brigantines that plied her Sarah Arnold, Curator of Education Page 2 Docent Dispatch Reprisal” to private citizens. A letter of marqué the allure of prize essentially served as a license that made it lawful for money from privately owned vessels to attack enemy shipping. privateering was so Without the letter of marqué, these same activities enticing that the United were considered acts of piracy and subject to States Navy found it prosecution. When a privateer captured an enemy difficult to man its own vessel (known as a prize), an admiralty prize court had vessels. This lack of to approve the seizure. Then, the prize and its cargo Privateer Ship Rattlesnake willing sailors resulted were sold at public auction and the proceeds from its in American press sale were divided among the vessel’s owners, gangs combing the wharfs, taverns, and brothels of investors, captain, and crew of the privateer, according ports from Boston to Savannah, seeking “recruits” for to a pre-arranged contract. service in the navy of the thirteen United States. The term “privateer” was interchangeable. It could be For the first few years of the war, the Royal Navy used to identify the captain, a crew member, or the had the resources to combat most American privateer vessel itself. Typically a group of investors financed a activity. With the alliance between the fledgling privateer to run the Royal Navy’s blockade to deliver United States and France in 1778, and Spain a year their cargoes to foreign markets and bring back goods later, the vessels of His Royal Majesty’s Navy were to America. If, during the voyage, the privateer spread thin. American privateers were able to take happened to capture an enemy vessel, they were to be advantage of the reduced British naval presence in its taken back to the United States or to a neutral port, waters. Together with the ability to use French and to condemned as a prize, and sold. The government or some extent Spanish ports throughout their respective investors that granted the original letter of marqué empires, American privateers and naval vessels alike would receive the lion’s share of the spoils. had the capacity to attack George III’s naval and When the Revolution began the American colonies commercial fleets in their home waters. According to were in no position to defy British rule of the seas. By statistics compiled by the United States Merchant 1776, the already battle tested Royal Navy had proven Marines, from 1775 to 1783 the Continental/United itself to be the world’s dominant maritime power. At States Navy consisted of only 64 vessels with no point in the conflict did the American naval forces American privateers adding another 1,697. The have adequate resources to confront His Majesty’s American Navy had an arsenal of 1,246 guns aboard Navy on its own terms. To circumvent this imbalance its vessels; the privateers had 14,872. The American of naval power, George III’s rebellious colonies turned Navy captured 196 enemy vessels during the war to privateering. On March 23, 1776, Congress compared to the privateers 2,283. It is estimated that responded to the situation by issuing general “Letters- American naval forces inflicted upwards of £66 of-Marqué and Reprisal,” making all British shipping, million of damage to British shipping, causing armed or unarmed, liable to capture by American insurance rates to skyrocket 30 to 50 percent during the vessels. A month later Congress resolved to send to conflict. The London Spectator candidly admitted: each of the “United Colonies” blank letters of marqué “The books at Lloyds will recount it, and the rate of signed by the President of Congress to be issued to assurances at that time will prove what their [American anyone willing to be commissioned a privateer. privateers] diminutive strength was able to effect in the During the war it had been estimated that sixty-four face of our navy, and that when nearly one hundred Virginia vessels sailed under letters of marqué issued pennants were flying on our coast. Were we able to by Congress. The individual states also issued their prevent their going in and out, or stop them from own letters of marqué to entrepreneurial private taking our trade and our storeships even in sight of our citizens to harass British shipping. garrisons? Besides, were they not in the English and In late 1776, the unbridled zeal for sailing under a Irish Channels, picking up our homeward bound trade, letter of marqué caused one Bostonian to write - “the sending their prizes into French and Spanish ports to spirit of privateering has got to the highest enthusiasm: the great terror of our merchants and shipowners?” almost every vessel from 20 tons to 400 is fitting out In contrast the British had 800 privateers, compared here.” The same scene was repeated in every port to the 1,697 American privateers in service during the along America’s east coast. As it might be imagined, Revolution. Military and naval historian Angus Page 3 Docent Dispatch Konstam points out in his work Privateers and Pirates enterprise. Not unlike George and Lund Washington, 1730-1830, that His Majesty’s privateers were it would not have been bad business for a merchant primarily “coastal vessels, designed to capture enemy like Carlyle to invest in such a scheme. According to shipping in the English Channel,” not on the high the memoirs of Commodore Joshua Barney (a naval seas. Therefore, British privateers did not have the hero of the Revolution and War of 1812) edited by same damaging effect on the economies of the his daughter -in-law Mary Chase Barney in 1832, as a thirteen United States as did their rebel counterparts nineteen -year-old lieutenant in February 1779, he on that of Great Britain’s. It was the blockade of the shipped aboard a privateer fitting out in Alexandria. American coast by the men-of-war of His Majesty’s In Barney’s memoirs the vessel was to carry “a cargo Royal Navy and the actions of the Loyalist privateers of tobacco … to Bordeaux.” A native of Baltimore that impeded commerce. Evidence of this appears in and known as a skilled and brash sailor, Barney was the March 12, 1779 issue of the Virginia Gazette barely sixteen when he began his service to his printed by John Dixon and Thomas Nicolson of Country. Owing to his success against the Royal Williamsburg.
Recommended publications
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1997, Volume 92, Issue No. 2
    i f of 5^1- 1-3^-7 Summer 1997 MARYLAND Historical Magazine TU THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Robert I. Cottom, Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor Donna B. Shear, Managing Editor Jeff Goldman, Photographer Angela Anthony, Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T.George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Robert W. Schoeberlein, Editorial Associates Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee/Ghair Jean H. Baker, Goucher Gollege James H. Bready, Baltimore Sun Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's Gity Gommission Toby L. Ditz, The Johns Hopkins University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio David G. Fogle, University of Maryland Jack G. Goellner, Baltimore Averil Kadis, Enoch Pratt Free Library Roland G. McGonnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Richard Striner, Washington Gollege John G. Van Osdell, Towson State University Alan R. Walden, WBAL, Baltimore Brian Weese, Bibelot, Inc., Pikesville Members Emeritus John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Gharles McG. Mathias, Ghevy Ghase The views and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors. The editors are responsible for the decision to make them public. ISSN 0025-4258 © 1997 by the Maryland Historical Society. Published as a benefit of membership in the Maryland Historical Society in March, June, September, and December.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing America
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING AMERICA (PRE-1754) PAGES SAMPLE CHAPTER OVERVIEW PAGES SAMPLE PAGES SAMPLE INTRODUCTION The story of the United States began in Europe, with competition among imperial powers to settle the great landmass of North America. From the 1500s onwards the wealthy but land-strapped kingdoms of Europe – England, France, Spain, Holland and Portugal – became aware of the economic and strategic potential of this bountiful new continent across the Atlantic. Explorers, settlers, conquistadors,1 captains, merchants and speculators braved perilous sea voyages into the unknown to plant their flag in a land they knew little about. By the late 1600s, several European powers had claimed their own piece of North America, leading to territorial competition and nationalist tensions. For a time it seemed as if this ‘new world’ might develop as a mirror of the old, divided Europe. Arguably the strongest of these imperial powers was Great Britain. Britain’s African American slave military strength, naval dominance and mastery of trade gave it the edge in being sold. matters of empire; this was reflected in the claim that ‘Britons … never will be slaves!’2 in the popular anthem Rule, Britannia! The true purpose of British imperialism, however, was not to conquer or rule but to make money. London maintained the colonies as a valuable source of raw materials and a market for manufactured products. Most imperial legislation was therefore concerned with the regulation of trade. By the mid-1760s, British America had evolved into a remarkably independent colonial system. Under a broad policy of ‘salutary A questionable neglect’, each of the thirteen colonies had become used to a significant degree representation of of self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Barney —
    HISTORICAL SOCIETY NOTES AND DOCUMENTS THE DEATH AND INTERMENT OF JOSHUA BARNEY Rebecca Hoskins CC* IVHESE bones live in the patriotic affection of the American X people. Clothed in the image of God, and animated with the spirit of their departed heroes, they were the public property of the nation." lThus spoke William McCandless on May 12, 1848, as he gave the funeral oration upon the removal to Allegheny Cemetery of the body of Commodore Joshua Barney, renowned naval hero of the American Revolution. Few residents of Pittsburgh are aware that their city is the last resting place of Joshua Barney, a colorful naval officer of the Revolu- tionary War. Barney, whose portrait hangs in Independence Hall in Philadelphia, had several links with the state of Pennsylvania and, although they are far from the sea, it is fitting that his bones rest inPittsburgh. This article willhighlight Barney's career as itpertains to this state and area, and detail the circumstances surrounding his death and burial in Pittsburgh. Barney's naval career was varied and interesting. Born in Maryland in 1759, he followed his boyhood obsession with the sea and was commissioned a navy lieutenant in 1776. He was twice captured by the British and served a year in an English prison but escaped back to America. He served with distinction in the navy until 1784 when he left voluntarily after a dispute over his rank. For the next ten years he engaged in commercial ventures, until in 1794 he bought an estate inKentucky. Barney then entered the merchant service and sailed as a privateer until 1796 when he was appointed a commander in the French navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Here 4 Events GETTING HERE 5 Itineraries Dunkirk AIRPORTS MILEAGE 6 Communities Owings Baltimore/Washington Washington D.C
    Photo by dK.i Photography CONTENTS 3 Getting Here 4 Events GETTING HERE 5 Itineraries Dunkirk AIRPORTS MILEAGE 6 Communities Owings Baltimore/Washington Washington D.C. ...................36 miles During your visit to our relaxing waterside community, we 8 Arts & Culture North Beach International Thurgood Annapolis, MD ...................... 29 miles hope you take time to fully experience the Chesapeake Bay 8 Antiques & Collectibles Marshall Airport (BWI) Baltimore, MD ....................... 53 miles lifestyle. We promise an unforgettable experience and wish 9 Maritime & Local History Located south of Baltimore Chesapeake Beach Richmond, VA .........................111 miles you happy discoveries as you “catch our drift” and experience 10 Hiking, Trails & Parks Drive Time: 1 hour Philadelphia, PA ...................150 miles all the great things Calvert County has to offer. 11 Fun For Families Pittsburgh, PA ..................... 270 miles 12 Get on the Water Reagan National New York, NY .......................230 miles Calvert County Board of County Commissioners 14 Marinas Airport (DCA) 15 Beaches Located in Washington, D.C. 16 Foodie Scene Drive Time: 1 hour LOCAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 18 Sweet Treats 19 Breweries & Wineries Dulles International (IAD) Enterprise Rent-A-Car: 410-414-2500 Huntingtown 20 Lodging Located in Northern Virginia Public Bus Service: 410-535-4510 21 Wedding Venues Drive Time: 1 hour, 20 minutes Checker Taxi: 240-508-2001 Smart Ride Inc.: 410-535-6932 CONNECT WITH US GROUP TOURS Facebook.com/VisitCalvertCounty For information on a variety of group tours and events, visit ChooseCalvert.com. @VisitCalvertCounty Find us on Youtube This guide has been compiled on behalf of the Calvert County Board of County Commissioners Prince Frederick to assist you while visiting Calvert County.
    [Show full text]
  • PELLIZZARI-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf (3.679Mb)
    A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Pellizzari, Peter. 2020. A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365752 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 A dissertation presented by Peter Pellizzari to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2020 © 2020 Peter Pellizzari All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisors: Jane Kamensky and Jill Lepore Peter Pellizzari A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 Abstract The American Revolution not only marked the end of Britain’s control over thirteen rebellious colonies, but also the beginning of a division among subsequent historians that has long shaped our understanding of British America. Some historians have emphasized a continental approach and believe research should look west, toward the people that inhabited places outside the traditional “thirteen colonies” that would become the United States, such as the Gulf Coast or the Great Lakes region.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase II and Phase III Archeological Database and Inventory
    Phase II and Phase III Archeological Database and Inventory Site Number: 18CV414 Site Name: Upper St.Leonards Creek Wrecks Prehistoric Other name(s) Jeffersonian Gunboat Number 138, Vessel D1 & D2 Historic Brief 18th century military vessel shipwreck, War of 1812 Unknown Description: Site Location and Environmental Data: Maryland Archeological Research Unit No. 9 SCS soil & sediment code Latitude 38.4399 Longitude -76.4890 Physiographic province Western Shore Coastal Terrestrial site Underwater site Elevation m Site slope Ethnobotany profile available Maritime site Nearest Surface Water Site setting Topography Ownership Name (if any) St. Leonard's Creek -Site Setting restricted Floodplain High terrace Private Saltwater Freshwater -Lat/Long accurate to within 1 sq. mile, user may Hilltop/bluff Rockshelter/ Federal Ocean Stream/river need to make slight adjustments in mapping to cave Interior flat State of MD account for sites near state/county lines or streams Estuary/tidal river Swamp Hillslope Upland flat Regional/ Unknown county/city Tidewater/marsh Lake or pond Ridgetop Other Unknown Spring Terrace Underwater Low terrace Minimum distance to water is 0 m Temporal & Ethnic Contextual Data: Contact period site ca. 1820 - 1860 Ethnic Associations (historic only) Paleoindian site Woodland site ca. 1630 - 1675 ca. 1860 - 1900 Native American Asian American Archaic site MD Adena ca. 1675 - 1720 ca. 1900 - 1930 African American Unknown Early archaic Early woodland ca. 1720 - 1780 Post 1930 Anglo-American Other MIddle archaic Mid. woodland ca. 1780 - 1820 Y Hispanic Late archaic Late woodland Unknown historic context Unknown prehistoric context Unknown context Y=Confirmed, P=Possible Site Function Contextual Data: Historic Furnace/forge Military Post-in-ground Urban/Rural? Other Battlefield Frame-built Domestic Prehistoric Transportation Fortification Masonry Homestead Multi-component Misc.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Vernon, Spring, 1788 George Washington, James Madison, Col
    I SETTING: Mount Vernon, Spring, 1788 PLAYERS: George Washington, James Madison, Col. David Humphreys, former aide-de-camp to George Washington and close friend PROPS: A facsimile of an 18th century newpaper and a manuscript letter NARRATOR: Welcome to Mount Vernon and the re-enactment of the good ship Federa1ist 's arriva1 at George Washington's home on the Potomac. We are all well aware of last autumn's celebration surrounding the bicentennial of the United States Constitution. However, as George Washington knew, September 17th, 1787 was only the beginning of the struggle to form a workable government. Although it is indeed a most historic date, the fact remains that without the states' approval of the Constitution, the efforts of the delegates in Philadelphia would have been for naught. On June 1, 1788, Captain Joshua Barney, an American nava1 hero of the Revolutionary War, set sail from Baltimore in a fifteen-foot ship christened the Federalist. A symbol of Maryland's recent ratification of the Constitution, Barney presented the ship to Washington upon his arrival at Mount Vernon on June g, two hundred years ago today. As we await Captain Barney's arrival, I direct your attention to _ where George Washington, the ever-gracious host, is joined by James Madison, a leading supporter of the Constitution and fellow Virginian, and Colonel David Humphreys, an aide-de-camp to Washington during the Revolutionary War and a trusted friend. They are discussing the ratification of the Constitution, as well as one of the likely results of its adoption - the election of General Washington as first president of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPERIOR COURT of the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA Civil Division
    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, a municipal corporation, 441 Fourth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN LOGAN REAL ESTATE, 1728 Kalorama Road, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009, Serve on: Brian Logan, Registered Agent 1728 Kalorama Road, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009,1 BRIAN LOGAN, Independent Broker I.D. #IB1212 1728 Kalorama Road, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009, Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff the District of Columbia (the District) brings this action against defendants Brian Logan Real Estate, an unregistered business in the District of Columbia,2 and Brian Logan, a District-licensed real estate broker and agent of Brian 1 Brian Logan Real Estate is an unregistered District corporation. Brian Logan is Brian Logan Real Estate’s last known registered agent and principal officer. 2 Upon information and belief, Brian Logan Real Estate’s District business license expired in 1990. Logan Real Estate. Defendants are liable for discriminatory practices that limit affordable housing and violate the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA), D.C. Code §§ 2-1401.01, et seq. In support of its claims, the District states as follows. INTRODUCTION 1. The District of Columbia faces a housing crisis. Affordable housing stock has trended downward while rents have trended upward, squeezing out low-income tenants. Housing-assistance programs that subsidize rent are a core pillar of the District’s response to these pressures. By subsidizing rent, housing assistance programs help the District’s lowest-income populations avoid homelessness and maintain a foothold in private housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Britain: a Useful Category of Historical Analysis?
    !"#$%#"&'"(%$()*&+&,-#./0&1$%#23"4&3.&5(-%3"(6$0&+)$04-(-7 +/%83"9-:*&;$<(=&+">(%$2# ?3/"6#*&@8#&+>#"(6$)&5(-%3"(6$0&A#<(#BC&D30E&FGHC&I3E&JC&9+K"EC&FLLL:C&KKE&HJMNHHO P/Q0(-8#=&Q4*&+>#"(6$)&5(-%3"(6$0&+--36($%(3) ?%$Q0#&,AR*&http://www.jstor.org/stable/2650373 +66#--#=*&SGTGUTJGGV&FV*SU Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aha. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org AHR Forum Greater Britain: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis? DAVID ARMITAGE THE FIRST "BRITISH" EMPIRE imposed England's rule over a diverse collection of territories, some geographically contiguous, others joined to the metropolis by navigable seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Dutch Economic Relations in the Atlantic World, 1688–1783
    Anglo-Dutch Economic Relations in the Atlantic World, 1688–1783 Kenneth Morgan Between the Glorious Revolution and the American Revolution, Britain and the Netherlands had significant economic connections that affected the Atlantic trade of both countries. Anglo-Dutch economic relations had their foundations in various factors. Anglo-Dutch trade had flourished from the Middle Ages onwards. London and Amsterdam were the major financial capi- tals of Europe, with considerable interaction among them. The English and the Dutch were natural allies as maritime powers between 1674, the end of the Third Anglo-Dutch War, and 1780, when after a century of almost complete neutrality in major wars, Britain and Holland became embroiled in conflict during the American Revolutionary War. In the period covered in this paper, harmonious relations between Britain and the Netherlands were embedded in formal treaties dated 1674, 1675 and 1678.1 Anglo-Dutch involvement in colonial affairs antedated that time: Dutch merchants had carried out extensive com- merce with Virginia in the mid-seventeenth century and the Dutch communi- ty’s commercial activities in New Netherland continued after England captured that colony in 1664 and renamed it New York. The Dutch connection with Virginia declined in the 1690s but Dutch economic and cultural influence in New York continued well into the eighteenth century.2 Anglo-Dutch economic 1 Alice Clare Carter, Neutrality or Commitment. The Evolution of Dutch Foreign Policy, 1667–1795 (London: Edward Arnold, 1975); Hugh Dunthorne, The Maritime Powers, 1721–1740: A Study of Anglo-Dutch Relations in the Age of Walpole (New York: Garland, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Bladensburg Battlefield Tour
    MARYLAND BATTLE OF BLADENSBURG MILESTONES BATTLEFIELD TOUR “The enemy are in full march to Washington, Have the materials prepared to destroy the bridges... PS – You had better remove the records.” - Secretary of State James Monroe in a letter to President Madison, August 23, 1814 During the War of 1812, — 50 miles south of Bladensburg. The British forces had control of the goal was to burn Capitol and federal Chesapeake Bay for over a year by buildings. the summer of 1814. A U.S. military command was created under Brigadier Secretary of State James Monroe General William Winder for the defense was sent to spy on the British troops. of Washington, D.C., Maryland, and He reported them “in full march.” eastern Virginia. Secretary of War John President Madison ordered two bridges Armstrong believed these forces would across the Eastern Branch of the be enough to protect the Capitol and Potomac (Anacostia River) destroyed to the region. protect the Capitol, leaving the bridge at Bladensburg as the only crossing. On August 20, 1814, under the American troops were sent toward command of Major General Robert Upper Marlborough to meet the British, but quickly retreated upon seeing the Ross over 4,500 seasoned British President James Madison Secretary of State James Monroe Brigadier General William Winder troops landed at Benedict, Maryland superior size of the British forces. by James Vanderlyn by Samuel Morse by Charles Saint-Mémin White House Historical Association White House Historical Association Library of Congress The British Attack 1 (NUMBERS DENOTE LOCATIONS ON MAP ON REAR.) At noon, British August 23, 1814 - Overnight in Bladensburg, General Winder forces entered Bladensburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Life of a Private
    Life of A Private By the 18th century Great Britain had established a series of American colonies along the American coast. While each colony had strong economic or political ties to Britain, they lacked strong bonds to one another. These American colonies were eco- nomically bound to Britain through the mercantile system, which restricted colonial trade. There was also an absence of banks and scarcity of gold and silver coins in the colonies which financially constrained the colonists. Many transactions in British America were conducted by credit and trade. What led to the American Revolution? Great Britain increased its American empire after the defeat of the French in the Seven Year’s War in 1763 (also known as the French and Indian War in America). Soon afterward, the British Parliament angered the colonists by restricting westward settle- ment and requiring the colonists to provide quarters or lodging for the British soldiers remaining in the colonies. Colonists were further angered when the British Parliament began taxing the British regiment marching colonists directly to help pay down the imperial war debt. Taxes were first levied on common household items imported into the colonies. Colonists responded to these unpopular British policies through boycotts and smuggling. Colonial resentment increased rapidly with the passage of the Stamp Act of 1765. This act required that certain items such as newspapers and legal documents be printed on paper bearing an embossed tax stamp. The paper was to be purchased from a government agent, who ensured that the tax was collected. Colonists responded through riots and intimidation of British officials.
    [Show full text]