Oxygen Removal from Injection Seawater in Offshore Platforms
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Oxygen removal from injection seawater in offshore platforms: vacuum tower versus membrane deaeration technology The study realized by Artes Ingegneria has the aim to compare two technologies for offshore injection water oxygen removal: Membrane Deaeration (MDA) and Vacuum Towers (VT). Performance, technical and economic aspects were investigated, the results demonstrate that MDA is the best choice when it comes to reaching a very low oxygen concentration. Study presented by ARTES Ingegneria at Membrane Technology for Climate Change Workshop in Korea, June 21st-24th 2017 28 Impiantistica Italiana - Luglio-Agosto 2017 his paper aims at making an overall vacuum towers while higher opex are associated comparison between two technolo- with MDA. Finally, weights and volumes were lower gies for oxygen removal from injection in case of degassing by MDA than by VTs. seawater in offshore platforms: vacu- um towers and membrane deaeration. The comparison was made between 1. Introduction anT executed vacuum towers based project (treating In many Oil & Gas offshore operations, the amount an overall inlet water flow rate of 92.5 m3/h com- of recovered oil from the reservoirs is increased by ing from pretreated seawater) and the equivalent means of several engineered techniques: among membrane deaeration (MDA) project configuration these, the injection of seawater into the wells plays obtained by the replacement of the towers and its a very important role. ancillaries with the membrane deaeration. The two Before being injected into the oil reservoirs, prelimi- deaeration modules systems were compared in nary seawater treatments must be performed such terms of the following characteristics: as the reduction of suspended/dissolved solids, di- • Performance of deaeration treatments: mea- spersed oil and dissolved gases. Oxygen, carbon sured in terms of oxygen concentration in the dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are the dissolved ga- outlet treated water stream; ses frequently found in injection water. In particular, • Equipment configuration: the configuration the content of oxygen must be reduced in order to of both systems including all the valves/in- avoid such problems of corrosion and biogrowth struments and the service equipment were which may affect the integrity of the reservoir. analyzed; A conventional approach for oxygen removal from • Costs evaluation: Both Capital costs (CAPEX) injection water is the utilization of vacuum tower re- and Operative costs (OPEX) associated with moving other than oxygen, carbon dioxide and all the two systems were evaluated; the other dissolved gases. • General characteristics: Footprint and weights, In a vacuum tower the reduction of gases is carried Chemicals consumption, systems’ operability out by reducing system pressure and consequently and transportation. gases solubility in agreement with the Henry Law; The results showed that for the specific case taken the gases which are separated from the water are into consideration, higher performances can be vented from the deaerator. reached by membrane deaeration system: in fact This approach presents many limits one of them an outlet oxygen concentration lower than 10 ppb is the low performance in the oxygen reduction: in was reached by membrane deaeration while higher many cases an outlet oxygen concentration lower oxygen concentration (about 50 ppb) was reached than 50 ppb cannot be reached with the exclusive by vacuum towers. In terms of costs, capex saving use of this treatment, so it is necessary the additio- resulted by using membrane deaeration instead of nal supply of an oxygen scavenger. Italian deletegates attending the 10th “Membrane Technology for Climate Change” workshop, in Daejeon, Korea, June 21st -24th 2017. The event was organized by Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) with the collaboration of the Italian Institute on Membrane Technology (ITM- CNR) 29 Impiantistica Italiana - Luglio-Agosto 2017 Moreover, high system footprint/volume and 2. Vacuum towers based weight may limit its utilization in an offshore ap- plication where compactness and lightness are project required from the plant. The reference executed project was an offshore On the other side, in the last years membrane seawater injection treatment plant operating in deaeration is gaining relevance as an attractive the Baltic Sea with an overall design flow rate alternative to the vacuum tower for degassing of 92.5 m3/h coming from pretreatment system. of injection seawater. This technology has been The package included seawater treatments for already tested in the field of seawater injection: the removal of both solid particles (required different pilot scale plants have been built in outlet solid particles concentration: 0.1 ppm) and order to evaluate the performances in oxygen dissolved oxygen (request outlet concentration: removal and to optimize the most suitable sea- < 20 ppb) from seawater in order to avoid water pretreatments upstream of membrane environmental alteration of the wells during deaeration. injection. Currently membrane deaeration is already suc- Feed water characteristics and treated water cessfully used in many applications such as elec- requirements can be found in Table 1. tronics, boiler feed water and food industries. A first seawater treatment was carried out by The aim of the present work is to make a com- means of two fine filters, where solid particles parison between vacuum towers and membra- with a diameter 2 µm and larger were removed ne deaeration in seawater offshore applications. with an efficiency of 98%. In details, the comparison was made between Each filter was composed by two different an executed offshore project, where the seawa- granular media layers: the anthracite as the upper ter deaeration was operated by a two stages one and garnet as lower layer. Polyelectrolyte vacuum tower and the simulated equivalent and coagulant were dosed in the seawater project obtained at the same operating condi- (downstream the injection feeding pumps) in tions and performances, by replacing the exi- order to facilitate the precipitation of carry over sting vacuum tower with membrane deaeration particles. modules. During normal operation both filters were in The comparative analysis was carried out in operation while in case of high pressure across terms of process performances, economical the filters, the backwashing/regeneration phase aspects (CAPEX and OPEX) and general cha- was required. Each filter was design to treat the racteristics of the two degassing systems such 100% of the inlet flow rate so that backwashing/ as the equipment weight, the footprint/volume regeneration sequence was performed on both and the amount of consumables and/or chemi- the filters sequentially. cals consumed during operation. After being filtrated, the seawater was fed Feed Water (IN) Outlet Water (OUT) Unit Design Flow Rate (min/max) 14.5/92.5 14.5/92.5 m3/h Operative Temperature +4/+32 +4/+32 °C (min/max) Operative Pressure 2/3/4 5 barg (min/normal/max) 0.1 (max size 2 µm) efficiency Total Suspeded Solids 4.5 (max size 25 µm) mg/l 98% Oxygen Concentration 13.88 mg/l ≤ 20 ppb - pH 7.83 7 – 8 - Table 1. Feed water characteristics and product requirements 30 Impiantistica Italiana - Luglio-Agosto 2017 to the vacuum deaerator column in order to reduce oxygen concentration thus avoiding corrosion problems and bacterial proliferation. Upstream the vacuum tower, different chemical products such as antifoaming and two different types of biocides were introduced for a further inactivation of sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB). The vacuum tower was a two Figure 2. Scheme of membrane deaeration operation mode stages columns composed by two packed beds separated by an hydraulic interstage seal; each packed bed was filled by random nominal 2” polypropylene Artes Ingegneria is qualified by 3M mass transfer packing type elements. Vapor as a system integrator for injection water extraction from the two packed sections degassing was made by the vacuum system which was composed by 2 x 100 % liquid ring vacuum pumps and one air ejector. Residual oxygen cartridge and the housing wall. content in outlet water from the deaerator was As explained, the separation principle by membra- 50 ppb after packed sections. Because of the ne deaeration differs from other membrane sepa- limited performance in oxygen removal of the rations such as filtration and gas separation. In fact vacuum tower, the residual oxygen reduction in LiquiCel membrane deaeration selected for this to the request value (lower than 20 ppb) was study, there is no convective flow through the pores obtained only through oxygen scavenger dosing. since the membranes act as an inert support that brings the liquid and gas phases into direct contact without any dispersion. 3.Membrane deaeration based 3.1Membrane deaeration sizing project In order to carry out a comparison between mem- Membrane deaeration represents a promising al- brane deaeration (MDA) and vacuum towers (VT) ternative to the vacuum towers in the removal of based deaeration system, an executed VT based dissolved oxygen from injection water, by providing project was analyzed. This project was compared high efficiency mass transfer between gas and liquid. with the equivalent process obtained by replace- Figure 1. They are based on the utilization of hydro- ment of vacuum towers with membrane deaeration phobic microporous hollow fiber membranes made modules. of polypropylene which contain large surface area. The sizing of the membrane deaeration