DOCSLIB.ORG

Ranganathan Svn Kondala's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ranganathan Svn Kondala's RANGANATHAN SVN KONDALA'S WWW.ONLINEIASCOACHING.COM 1857 T0 1905 The Great Revolt to The Great Struggle ModernFrom Indian Downloaded History www.studymasterofficial.com WWW.ONLINEIASCOACHING.COM www.unacademy.com/@srivenr 1 Contents 1857 – Revolt ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Causes Of The Revolt ......................................................................................................................... 7 Political Causes .................................................................................................................................... 7 Annexations of Princely States ..................................................................................................... 7 Abolition of Regal Titles ................................................................................................................ 8 Rule of the British ........................................................................................................................... 8 Economic and Administrative Cause ............................................................................................... 8 Land Revenue Settlements ............................................................................................................ 8 Destruction of Indian Trade, Handicraft and Industry ............................................................ 9 Alienation of the Upper and Middle Classes ............................................................................. 9 Social and Religious Causes ............................................................................................................From 10 British Attitude of Racial Discrimination .................................................................................. 10 British Interference in Religion and Culture ............................................................................ 10 Military Causes .................................................................................................................................. 11 Grievances of the Sepoys ............................................................................................................. 11 Professional Grievances ............................................................................................................... 11 Religious Grievances .................................................................................................................... 12 Immediate Cause ............................................................................................................................... 12 The Mutiny And The Revolt ................................................................................................................ 13 The Mutiny ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Spread of the Revolt ..................................................................................................................... 14 Storm Centres .................................................................................................................................... 16 The DefeatDownloaded of Mutineers ................................................................................................................... 17 Causes Of Failure Of The Revolt .................................................................................................... 18 Significance ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Impact Of The Revolt ........................................................................................................................ 22 The Changes Post Revolt ............................................................................................................. 22 Change in Policy Towards the Upper Classes {Princes and Landlords) .............................. 23 Change in Policy Towards the Common Masses ......................................................................... 24 Changeswww.studymasterofficial.com and Impact: Indian Economy ............................................................................................... 25 Company policy of Merchant Trade .............................................................................................. 26 Trade to Land Revenue .................................................................................................................... 27 Ranganthan SVN Kondala – Telegram @ UPSCGS1 ( https://t.me/upscgs1) 2 Changing Phases: Colonialism to Administrator ......................................................................... 27 1600-1757 – Precolonial Stage .......................................................................................................... 27 Era of Merchant Capitalism or Mercantilism (1757 to 1813) ...................................................... 28 Industrial Capitalism 1813 to 1857 ................................................................................................. 32 Changes In Indian Agrarian Structure ........................................................................................... 32 New Land Revenue Settlement ....................................................................................................... 33 Early Experiments with Land Revenue ......................................................................................... 33 Permanent Settlement (by Cornwallis, Bengal, 1793) ............................................................. 35 Ryotwari System ........................................................................................................................... 37 Mahalwari System (Northern India, 1822) ............................................................................... 38 Economic Impact of Various Land Revenue Settlements ........................................................... 39 Economic Impact Of British Rule In India ..................................................................................... 40 Disruption of Traditional Economy ............................................................................................... 40 Ruin of Old Zamindars and Rise of New Landed ClassesFrom ..................................................... 40 De-Industrialisation and Ruralisation of Indian Economy .................................................... 40 Commercialisation of Agriculture ............................................................................................. 42 Commercialisation of Agriculture – Effects.............................................................................. 42 Positive Impacts of Commercialization of Agriculture: ......................................................... 43 Drain of wealth .................................................................................................................................. 43 Early Drain of wealth ................................................................................................................... 43 Dadabhai Naoroji’s theory of the Drain of Wealth .................................................................. 44 Factors of External Drain ............................................................................................................. 44 Council Bills................................................................................................................................... 45 Interest on Foreign Capital Investments ................................................................................... 46 Foreign Banking ............................................................................................................................ 46 Rise ofDownloaded Modern Industries under the British ................................................................................. 49 Roads and Indian Railways ........................................................................................................ 49 Postal System and Telegraph ...................................................................................................... 49 Press ................................................................................................................................................ 49 New Indian Bourgeoisie ................................................................................................................... 50 Administrative Developments ( 1784 t0 1858 ) .................................................................................. 52 www.studymasterofficial.comThe Pitt’s India Act (1784) ................................................................................................................ 52 Provisions of the 1784 Act: ............................................................................................................... 52 Result of Creation of Board of Control: ......................................................................................... 52 Ranganthan SVN Kondala – Telegram @ UPSCGS1 ( https://t.me/upscgs1) 3 Impact on Governor General-in Council: .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Overseas Territories Law
    British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Koninkrijk Tegen Het Licht
    Het Koninkrijk tegen het licht Rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek in opdracht van de Tweede Kamer der Staten- Generaal naar de staatsrechtelijke overzeese verhoudingen in het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, de Franse Republiek, het Koninkrijk Denemarken en het Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland prof. mr. H.G. Hoogers mr. G. Karapetian april 2019 INHOUDSOPGAVE Inleiding en aanleiding tot het onderzoek 3 Hoofdstuk 1 Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 7 §1. Inleiding 7 §2. Een smalle rechtsband 8 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 9 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhoudingen 10 §5. Financiën 11 §6. Defensie en openbare orde 11 §7. De beslechting van geschillen 13 Hoofdstuk 2 De Franse Republiek 16 §1. Inleiding 16 §2. Les collectivités territoriales: DrOM, COM en Nieuw-Caledonië 17 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 21 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhouding en financiën 22 §5. Defensie en openbare orde 23 §6. De beslechting van geschillen 23 §7. Conclusie 24 Hoofdstuk 3 Het Koninkrijk Denemarken 25 §1. Inleiding; de structuur van het Deense Rijk 25 §2. De rechtsband tussen Denemarken en de beide andere Rijksdelen 29 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 30 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhoudingen 31 §5. Financiën en openbare orde 31 §6. Defensie 31 §7. De beslechting van geschillen 32 §8. Conclusie 33 Hoofdstuk 4 Het Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland 35 §1. Inleiding 35 §2. Veertien Constituties voor veertien British Overseas Territories 37 §3. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 39 §4. Sociaaleconomische verhouding en financiën 41 §5. Defensie en openbare orde 42 §6. De beslechting van geschillen 42 §7. Conclusie 43 Hoofdstuk 5. Conclusies 44 §1. De structuur van de staatkundige relaties 44 §2. Democratische vertegenwoordiging 46 §3.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory
    Feasibility Study for the Resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory Draft Report 13th November 2014 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 4 1.1 The British Indian Ocean Territory 4 1.2 Aims and overview of this study 5 1.3 Structure of this draft report 6 2 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 7 2.1 Guiding principles 7 2.2 Analytical framework 8 2.3 Key phases of activity 11 3 KEY ACTIVITIES AND RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS 13 3.1 Field visit to the British Indian Ocean Territory 13 3.2 Consultations and survey results 15 3.3 Overview of resettlement options 18 4 LEGAL AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS 20 4.1 Introduction and overview 20 4.2 Constitutional and governance framework 22 4.3 Treaty arrangements between the US and the UK 31 4.4 Environmental protection laws and conventions 32 4.5 Conclusions and implications for resettlement 35 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 38 5.1 Introduction and overview 38 5.2 Assessment of key environmental issues 38 5.3 Evaluation of potential resettlement locations 48 5.4 Summary environmental comparison of resettlement options 55 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS 58 6.1 Introduction and overview 58 6.2 Assessment of key infrastructure issues 59 6.3 Summary of implications for resettlement 66 7 ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 68 7.1 Introduction and overview 68 7.2 Data sources 68 7.3 Indicative cost estimates 68 8 COMPARISON OF RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS 74 8.1 Choice of resettlement location 74 8.2 Environmental considerations 76 8.3 Comparative costs of resettlement options 79 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BIOT British Indian Ocean
    [Show full text]
  • East India Company - Wikipedia
    1/17/2019 East India Company - Wikipedia East India Company The East India Company (EIC), also known as the Honourable East East India Company (EIC) India Company (HEIC) or the British East India Company and informally as John Company,[2] Company Bahadur,[3] or simply The Company, was an English and later British joint-stock company.[4] It was formed to trade in the Indian Ocean region, initially with Mughal India and the East Indies (Maritime Southeast Asia), and later with Qing China. The company ended up seizing control over large parts of the Indian subcontinent, colonized parts of Southeast Asia, and colonized Hong Kong after a war with Qing China. Company flag (1801) Originally chartered as the "Governor and Company of Merchants of London trading into the East Indies", the company rose to account for half of the world's trade[5], particularly in basic commodities including cotton, silk, indigo dye, salt, spices, saltpetre, tea, and opium. The company also ruled the beginnings of the British Empire in India.[5] In his speech to the House of Commons in July 1833, Lord Macaulay explained that since the beginning, the East India company had always been involved in both trade and politics, just as its French and Dutch counterparts had been.[6] The company received a Royal Charter from Queen Elizabeth I on 31 December Coat of arms (1698) 1600, coming relatively late to trade in the Indies. Before them the Portuguese Estado da Índia had traded there for much of the 16th century and the first of Former type Public half a dozen Dutch Companies sailed to trade there from 1595.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham the Persistence of Colonial
    University of Birmingham The persistence of colonial constitutionalism in British overseas territories Yusuf, Hakeem; Chowdhury, Tanzil DOI: 10.1017/S2045381718000369 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Yusuf, H & Chowdhury, T 2019, 'The persistence of colonial constitutionalism in British overseas territories', Global Constitutionalism, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 157-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000369 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 06/12/2018 This article has not yet been published. It will appear in a revised form in [Journal]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press 2019. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirteenth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 179) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 117) STATUTE LAW REVISION: THIRTEENTH REPORT . 8 1 ! DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty May I989 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE - -. E10.40 net Cm. 671 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law CommissionsAct 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Beldam, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. Michael Collon. Its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman Dr E. M. Clive Professor P. N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff C. G. B. Nicholson, Q.C. Mr W. A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commissionis Mr K. F. Barclay. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. , : I -: + .. -- 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION Statute Law Revision: Thirteenth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Fraser of Carmyllie, Q.C., Her Majesty’s Advocate. In pursuance of section 3(l)(d) of the Law CommissionsAct 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Colonial Constitutionalism in British Overseas Territories
    The persistence of colonial constitutionalism in British overseas territories Item Type Article Authors Yusuf, Hakeem O.; Chowdhury, Tanzil Citation Yusuf, H.O. and Chowdhury, T., (2019). 'The persistence of colonial constitutionalism in British Overseas Territories'. Global Constitutionalism, 8(1), pp.157-190. DOI: 10.1017/ S2045381718000369. DOI 10.1017/S2045381718000369. Publisher Cambridge University Press Journal Global Constitutionalism Download date 01/10/2021 16:15:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10545/623733 The Persistence of Colonial Constitutionalism in British Overseas Territories Hakeem O. Yusuf *and Tanzil Chowdhury** Abstract: This article argues that despite the UK Government’s exaltations of self- determination of its Overseas Territories, provisions of colonial governance persist in their constitutions. Further, it posits that such illustrations begin to answer the broader question of whether British Overseas Territories (BOTs) are modern day colonies. Such claims are not without merit given that 10 out of the 14 BOTS are still considered Non- Self-Governing Territories by the United Nations and have remained the target of decolonisation efforts. Drawing insights from post-colonial legal theory, this article develops the idea of the persistence of colonial constitutionalism to interrogate whether structural continuities exist in the governance of the UK’s British Overseas Territories. The analysis begins to unravel the fraught tensions between constitutional provisions that advance greater self-determination and constitutional provisions that maintain the persistence of colonial governance. Ultimately, the post-colonial approach foregrounds a thoroughgoing analysis on whether BOTs are colonies and how such an exegesis would require particular nuance that is largely missing in current institutional and non- institutional articulations of, as well as representations on, the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 150) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 99) STATUTE LAW REVISION TWELFTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty November 1985 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE €6.70 net Cmnd. 9648 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissionersare: The Honourable Mr. Justice Beldam,* Chairman Mr. Trevor M. Adridge Mr. Brian J. Davenport, Q.C. Professor Julian Farrand Mrs. Brenda Hoggett The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. J. G. H. Gasson and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Maxwell, Chairman Mr. R. D. D. Bertram, W.S. Dr. E. M. Clive Mr. J. Murray, Q.C. SheriffC. G. B. Nicholson, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr. R. Eadie and its offices are at 140Causewayside, Edinburgh EG9 IPR. * As from 1 October 1985. .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION Statute Law Revision: Twelfth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone, C.H., Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Cameronof Lochbroom,Q.C., Her Majesty’s Advocate. In pursuance of section 3( l)(d) of the Law CommissionsAct 1965,we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • The St Helena, Ascension and Tristan Da Cunha Constitution Order 2009
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2009 No. 1751 SOUTH ATLANTIC TERRITORIES The St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Constitution Order 2009 Made - - - - 8th July 2009 Laid before Parliament 15th July 2009 Coming into force in accordance with section 1(3) At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 8th day of July 2009 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred upon Her by section 112 of the Saint Helena Act 1833(1), the British Settlements Acts 1887 and 1945(2) and of all other powers enabling Her to do so, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is ordered, as follows: Citation, publication and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Constitution Order 2009. (2) This Order shall be published in the Gazette. (3) This Order shall come into force on the appointed day. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “the appointed day” means such day as may be prescribed by the Governor, acting in his or her discretion, by proclamation published in the Gazette; “the Constitution” means the Constitution set out in the Schedule; “the existing Constitution” means the Constitution set out in Schedule 1 to the St Helena Constitution Order 1988(3); (1) 1833 c.85. (2) 1887 c.54 and 1945 c.7. (3) S.I. 1988/1842. Document Generated: 2021-08-13 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham the Persistence of Colonial
    University of Birmingham The persistence of colonial constitutionalism in British overseas territories Yusuf, Hakeem; Chowdhury, Tanzil DOI: 10.1017/S2045381718000369 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Yusuf, H & Chowdhury, T 2019, 'The persistence of colonial constitutionalism in British overseas territories', Global Constitutionalism, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 157-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000369 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 06/12/2018 This article has not yet been published. It will appear in a revised form in [Journal]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press 2019. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resignation of the Third Indian Law Commission: Who Makes Law?
    Gail Pearson* THE RESIGNATION OF THE THIRD INDIAN LAW COMMISSION: WHO MAKES LAW? ABSTRACT Codes of law are meant to provide a coherent whole within a given taxonomy of law. The code is a very old idea; think Justinian. In the English context, Jeremy Bentham revived the idea at the end of the 18th century. The systematisation of law in a code, by high- level principles or rules, contrasts with the organic evolution of law through decisions made on particular disputes by courts. The British worked on the possibility of codes within two frames: codes for Britain and codes for the Empire. This article looks at a particular moment in making the first commercial code for India, the Indian Contract Act 1872 (India). The resignation of the Law Commissioners who had initially drafted that Act raises a question where there is an intersection of law and history, namely where should authority to make law lie? I INTRODUCTION n July 1870, the majority of the members of the third Indian Law Commission resigned. Its members had been appointed in England in 1861 by Queen Victoria Ito draft substantive law for India.1 Their will had been thwarted by the government of India. The subject of the quarrel was a proposed code of law for India to encompass contracts, sale of moveables, indemnity and guarantee, bailment, agency and * Professor of Business Law, University of Sydney. 1 The term ‘substantive law’ is drawn from Jeremy Bentham’s distinction between substantive and adjectival law. The proposal to draft a substantive law was made by the second Indian Law Commission set up in 1853.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Law a Joint Consultation Paper
    Electoral Law A Joint Consultation Paper Joint Consultation Paper LCCP 218 / SLCDP 158 / NILC 20 (2014) Law Commission Scottish Law Commission Northern Ireland Law Commission Joint Consultation Paper LCCP 218 / SLCDP 158 / NILC 20 (2014) ELECTORAL LAW A Joint Consultation Paper © Crown copyright 2014 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications ISBN 9780108560859 ID 204121401 12/14 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed and published in the UK by the Stationery Office Limited ii THE LAW COMMISSIONS: HOW WE CONSULT About the Commissions: The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965. The Northern Ireland Law Commission was set up by section 50 of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. Each Commission has the purpose of promoting reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones (Chairman), Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod QC and Nicholas Paines QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Pentland (Chairman), Laura J Dunlop QC, Patrick Layden QC, TD, Professor Hector L MacQueen and Dr Andrew J M Steven.
    [Show full text]