ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado
Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Prepared for: Pueblo County Planning Department Pueblo, Colorado Prepared by: Susan Spackman Panjabi, Botanist John Sovell, Zoologist Georgia Doyle, Wetland Ecologist Denise Culver, Ecologist Lee Grunau, Conservation Planner May 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 USER’S GUIDE The Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County was conducted one year after the Survey of Critical Wetland and Riparian Areas in El Paso and Pueblo Counties. The projects, both conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, are two distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout the globe, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each report prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each report, so that each report can stand alone and be used independently of the other. This report, Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, presents all potential conservation areas identified in Pueblo County that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas. -
The Water Beetles of Miller Blue Hole, Sandusky County, Ohio (Insecta: Coleoptera)1-2
THE WATER BEETLES OF MILLER BLUE HOLE, SANDUSKY COUNTY, OHIO (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA)1-2 BRIAN E. MELIN AND ROBERT C. GRAVES Department of Biology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43408 ABSTRACT Thirty-one species of aquatic beetles, representing the families Dytiscidae, Hydro- philidae, Haliplidae, and Gyrinidae, were collected in the Miller Blue Hole, a large spring, between October 21, 1967, and January 27, 1969. The numbers of each species collected are tabulated by monthly intervals. Some of the species present in this unusual habitat are rare; Tropisternus columbianus is apparently recorded from Ohio for the first time. INTRODUCTION The Ohio "blue holes" are the outlets of an extensive underground drainage system occurring in limestone bedrock. They may best be thought of as gigantic springs reaching the surface as deep, conical pools or ponds which are drained by streams flowing into Lake Erie. There are several "blue holes" located in San- dusky and Erie counties, the best known being the Castalia Blue Hole, which has been "developed" as a commercial tourist attraction, with the result that its original natural environment has been destroyed. Closely adjacent to this one is the biggest of the "blue holes," the large spring-fed lake in the center of the town of Castalia. The Miller Blue Hole, six miles to the west of this town, is nearly two acres in size, and has been preserved by the state since 1932 in a relatively natural condi- tion. It is located in a 13-acre wooded tract surrounded by agricultural lands. Earlier works dealing with Miller Blue Hole have only briefly mentioned water beetles. -
IV Trobada D'estudiosos De La Serralada Litoral Central I VIII Del
Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals 7 IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor Col·lecció Eines Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals El 20 i 21 de novembre de 2019 va tenir lloc a Vallgorguina la IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor, amb l’objectiu de donar a conèixer els estudis i recerques duts a terme els últims quatre anys en diferents àmbits de les ciències socials i naturals del territori. En total es van presentar 47 comunicacions que van abordar temes rellevants i innovadors, però també estudis de base o projectes de gestió aplicada per a la conservació d’espècies o per al control d’espècies exòtiques, entre d’altres. Aquests treballs, que amb aquesta publicació tenim l’oportunitat de llegir amb detall, suposen una contribució inestimable per millorar el coneixement de la realitat d’aquests tres parcs, dels seus valors naturals, paisatgístics i culturals, i són de gran utilitat per al personal encarregat de gestionar-los i per a qualsevol persona interessada en la seva conservació. Col·lecció Eines Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals 7 IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor Vallgorguina, 20 i 21 de novembre de 2019 Col·lecció Eines Primera edició: desembre de 2020 © dels textos: els seus autors © de l’edició: Diputació de Barcelona Coordinació: Gerència de Serveis d’Espais Naturals de la Diputació de Barcelona Producció: Gabinet de Premsa i Comunicació de la Diputació de Barcelona Composició: -
PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY of SCIENCE Volume 98 2018
PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Volume 98 2018 EDITOR: Mostafa Elshahed Production Editor: Tammy Austin Business Manager: T. David Bass The Official Organ of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Which was established in 1909 for the purpose of stimulating scientific research; to promote fraternal relationships among those engaged in scientific work in Oklahoma; to diffuse among the citizens of the State a knowledge of the various departments of science; and to investigate and make known the material, educational, and other resources of the State. Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Publication Date: January 2019 ii POLICIES OF THE PROCEEDINGS The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science contains papers on topics of interest to scientists. The goal is to publish clear communications of scientific findings and of matters of general concern for scientists in Oklahoma, and to serve as a creative outlet for other scientific contributions by scientists. ©2018 Oklahoma Academy of Science The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy Base and/or other appropriate repository. of Science contains reports that describe the Information necessary for retrieval of the results of original scientific investigation data from the repository will be specified in (including social science). Papers are received a reference in the paper. with the understanding that they have not been published previously or submitted for 4. Manuscripts that report research involving publication elsewhere. The papers should be human subjects or the use of materials of significant scientific quality, intelligible to a from human organs must be supported by broad scientific audience, and should represent a copy of the document authorizing the research conducted in accordance with accepted research and signed by the appropriate procedures and scientific ethics (proper subject official(s) of the institution where the work treatment and honesty). -
Microsoft Outlook
Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA). -
Butterflies of North America
Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS -
(Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) on Mosquitoes: Support for Conservation- Based Mosquito Suppression in Constructed Wetlands
Freshwater Biology (2009) 54, 2003–2014 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02230.x APPLIED ISSUES Selective predation by larval Agabus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) on mosquitoes: support for conservation- based mosquito suppression in constructed wetlands LAUREN E. CULLER AND WILLIAM O. LAMP Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. Wetland insect predators can structure aquatic prey communities via selective predation, but receive considerably less attention than vertebrate predators. We conducted laboratory experiments to test selective predation by two species of larval dytiscid beetles (Agabus; Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) and the potential contribution of these beetles to suppression of mosquito populations in constructed wetlands. 2. Agabus consumed copepods, ostracods and mosquito larvae in no-choice tests. When offered a choice, 76% of all prey consumed were mosquito larvae, indicating selective predation. Subsequent experiments revealed this preference was due to ease of capture of mosquito larvae over alternative prey. 3. Cannibalism and intraguild predation were common within and between species of Agabus, which may reduce the overall impact of the observed selective predation. 4. Agabus larvae selectively preyed on mosquito larvae over alternative prey, which is not characteristic of some fish used as biological control agents for mosquitoes. Predator exclusion or similar experiments in the field could document how these results translate into a natural setting. 5. The findings of this study suggest developing mosquito suppression strategies focused on conservation of native wetland predators. These strategies are preferable to introducing non-native generalist predators, or applying pesticides. Keywords: constructed wetlands, Dytiscidae, mosquitoes, predation, prey selection Wissinger, 1996; Batzer & Sharitz, 2006). -
Aquatic Insects and Their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population
insects Review Aquatic Insects and their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population D. Dudley Williams 1,* and Siân S. Williams 2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C1A4, Canada 2 The Wildlife Trust, The Manor House, Broad Street, Great Cambourne, Cambridge CB23 6DH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editors: Kerry Wilkinson and Heather Bray Received: 28 April 2017; Accepted: 19 July 2017; Published: 21 July 2017 Abstract: Of the 30 extant orders of true insect, 12 are considered to be aquatic, or semiaquatic, in either some or all of their life stages. Out of these, six orders contain species engaged in entomophagy, but very few are being harvested effectively, leading to over-exploitation and local extinction. Examples of existing practices are given, ranging from the extremes of including insects (e.g., dipterans) in the dietary cores of many indigenous peoples to consumption of selected insects, by a wealthy few, as novelty food (e.g., caddisflies). The comparative nutritional worth of aquatic insects to the human diet and to domestic animal feed is examined. Questions are raised as to whether natural populations of aquatic insects can yield sufficient biomass to be of practicable and sustained use, whether some species can be brought into high-yield cultivation, and what are the requirements and limitations involved in achieving this? Keywords: aquatic insects; entomophagy; human diet; animal feed; life histories; environmental requirements 1. Introduction Entomophagy (from the Greek ‘entoma’, meaning ‘insects’ and ‘phagein’, meaning ‘to eat’) is a trait that we Homo sapiens have inherited from our early hominid ancestors. -
Animal Biodiversity: an Introduction to Higher-Level Classification and Taxonomic Richness
Zootaxa 3148: 7–12 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Animal biodiversity: An introduction to higher-level classification and taxonomic richness ZHI-QIANG ZHANG Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; [email protected] Abstract For the kingdom Animalia, 1,552,319 species have been described in 40 phyla in a new evolutionary classification. Among these, the phylum Arthropoda alone represents 1,242,040 species, or about 80% of the total. The most successful group, the Insecta (1,020,007 species), accounts for about 66% of all animals. The most successful insect order, Coleoptera (387,100 spe- cies), represents about 38% of all species in 39 insect orders. Another major group in Arthropoda is the class Arachnida (112,201 species), which is dominated by the mites and ticks (Acari 54,617 species) and spiders (43,579 species). Other highly diverse arthropod groups include Crustacea (66,914 species), Trilobitomorpha (19,606 species) and Myriapoda (11,885 spe- cies). The phylum Mollusca (117,358 species) is more diverse than other successful invertebrate phyla Platyhelminthes (29,285 species), Nematoda (24,783 species), Echinodermata (20,509 species), Annelida (17,210 species) and Bryozoa (10,941 species). The phylum Craniata, including the vertebrates, represents 64,832 species (for Recent taxa, except for amphibians): among these 7,694 described species of amphibians, 31,958 species of “fish” and 5,750 species of mammals. Introduction Discovering and describing how many species inhabit the Earth remains a fundamental quest of biology, even when we are entering the “phylogenomic age” in the history of taxonomy. -
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
The Approach to Taxonomic Problems1 Frank N. Young, Indiana University Of all the large family of zoologists the entomologist, who calls himself a taxonomist, has won the firmest place in the public mind as a simple minded eccentric. He is the character who is continually being caricatured as dashing madly across the fields, butterfly net in hand and goatee ram- pant. It is to him also that we owe the definition of entomology as that science which consists of moving insect pins from one place in a box to another. This popular stereotype of the taxonomist has come about through a misunderstanding of what taxonomists do and the purposes behind their work. It is also the outgrowth of the personality of indi- viduals, whom we associate with taxonomy, and about whom various wild and unprovable tales have grown up. It is useless to deny that a certain percentage of taxonomists are queer ducks, but it is unfortunate that we seldom hear about those who seem to be normal. In the early days of entomology in this country, the objectives of the few taxonomists, who had the inclination and courage to attempt the classification of our vast insect fauna, were quite different from those of workers in the same field today. Many of the early workers were firm believers in special creation of species and to them their task was simply to produce catalogues of existing and immutable entities. Later evolu- tionary theories influenced various workers, and many of the abuses which we lay at their feet were the result of attempts to extend the methods of classical descriptive taxonomy into areas where they could not be applied. -
A Redescription of the First Instar of Rhantus Calidus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with Notes on Its Biology B
Georgia Journal of Science Volume 69 No. 2 Scholarly Contributions from the Article 1 Membership and Others 2011 A Redescription of the First Instar of Rhantus calidus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with Notes on its Biology B. R. Lemieux E. H. Barman Georgia College and State University, [email protected] B. P. White Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Lemieux, B. R.; Barman, E. H.; and White, B. P. (2011) "A Redescription of the First Instar of Rhantus calidus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with Notes on its Biology," Georgia Journal of Science, Vol. 69, No. 2, Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs/vol69/iss2/1 This Research Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia Journal of Science by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. Lemieux et al.: A Redescription of the First Instar of Rhantus calidus 79 A REDESCRIPTION OF THE FIRST INSTAR OF RHANTUS CALIDUS (FABRICIUS) (COLEOPTERA: DYTISCIDAE) WITH NOTES ON ITS BIOLOGY B. R. Lemieux Science Department Benedictine Military School Savannah, GA 31406 E. H. Barman William P. Wall Museum of Natural History Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Georgia College & State University Milledgeville, GA 31061 B. P. White Natural Science Department Georgia Military College Warner Robins, GA 31093 Address Correspondence To: E. H. Barman William P. Wall Museum of Natural History Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Georgia College & State University Milledgeville, GA 31061 [email protected] ABSTRACT First instars of Rhantus calidus (Fabricius) representing a Georgia population are described and illustrated. -
Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
Prepared by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Assistance from Conservation Partners Natural Resources Board Approved August 2005 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Acceptance September 2005 Wisconsin’s Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Governor Jim Doyle Natural Resources Board Gerald M. O’Brien, Chair Howard D. Poulson, Vice-Chair Jonathan P Ela, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Christine L. Thomas John W. Welter Stephen D. Willet Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Scott Hassett, Secretary Laurie Osterndorf, Division Administrator, Land Paul DeLong, Division Administrator, Forestry Todd Ambs, Division Administrator, Water Amy Smith, Division Administrator, Enforcement and Science Recommended Citation: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2005. Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need. Madison, WI. “When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” – John Muir The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio-tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Endangered Resources, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or call (608) 266-7012 for copies of this report. Pub-ER-641 2005