Cage Questionnaire Stand For
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mnemonics in a Mnutshell: 32 Aids to Psychiatric Diagnosis
Mnemonics in a mnutshell: 32 aids to psychiatric diagnosis Clever, irreverent, or amusing, a mnemonic you remember is a lifelong learning tool ® Dowden Health Media rom SIG: E CAPS to CAGE and WWHHHHIMPS, mnemonics help practitioners and trainees recall Fimportant lists (suchCopyright as criteriaFor for depression,personal use only screening questions for alcoholism, or life-threatening causes of delirium, respectively). Mnemonics’ effi cacy rests on the principle that grouped information is easi- er to remember than individual points of data. Not everyone loves mnemonics, but recollecting diagnostic criteria is useful in clinical practice and research, on board examinations, and for insurance reimbursement. Thus, tools that assist in recalling di- agnostic criteria have a role in psychiatric practice and IMAGES teaching. JUPITER In this article, we present 32 mnemonics to help cli- © nicians diagnose: • affective disorders (Box 1, page 28)1,2 Jason P. Caplan, MD Assistant clinical professor of psychiatry • anxiety disorders (Box 2, page 29)3-6 Creighton University School of Medicine 7,8 • medication adverse effects (Box 3, page 29) Omaha, NE • personality disorders (Box 4, page 30)9-11 Chief of psychiatry • addiction disorders (Box 5, page 32)12,13 St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix, AZ • causes of delirium (Box 6, page 32).14 We also discuss how mnemonics improve one’s Theodore A. Stern, MD Professor of psychiatry memory, based on the principles of learning theory. Harvard Medical School Chief, psychiatric consultation service Massachusetts General Hospital How mnemonics work Boston, MA A mnemonic—from the Greek word “mnemonikos” (“of memory”)—links new data with previously learned information. -
Title: Approved Behavioral Health Screening Tools for 3Ai and 4Aiii
Title: Approved Behavioral Health Screening Tools for 3ai and 4aiii Date Created: 10/8/2015 Date Modified: 07/27/2017 Date Approved by Board of Directors: 11/10/2015 Clinical Guideline # CGC-CG-26 Purpose: The purpose of this guideline is to establish a menu of approved behavioral health screening tools for use in the 3ai Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care (Model 1) project and 4aiii Strengthening Mental Health and Substance Abuse Infrastructure Across Systems. Participating practices may choose from the menu of approved screening tools below or use nationally-accepted best practice that are determined to be aged-appropriate: Approved Screening Tools: Depression: PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire (9 questions) PHQ-2: Patient Health Questionnaire (2 questions) Anxiety: GAD-7: General Anxiety Disorder (7 questions) Substance CAGE-AID: Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-Opener (4 questions) Abuse: CAGE: 4 questions AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (10 questions) DAST- 10: Drug-Abuse Screening Test (10 question; excludes alcohol) CRAFFT: Series of 6 questions to identify adolescents 14- 21 years of age for risky alcohol and other drug use disorders NIAAA: 3 question screen Trauma: PC-PTSD: Primary Care- Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (for veterans) PCL-C: Abbreviated PTSD Checklist, Civilian Version Suicide or Nursing Assessment for Suicide/Violence (4 questions) Violence: If appropriate, followed by: Suicide Assessment (23 questions) Violence Assessment (23 questions) BH Works: BH Works, a tablet-based screening IT solution has a “smart” assessment tool which covers 13 domains of behavioral health. SBIRT: Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment is an evidence based practice. -
Texas Children's Health Plan Provider Manual
Texas Children’s Health Plan Provider Manual STAR/Medicaid Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Austin Hardin Matagorda San Jacinto Austin Hardin Matagorda San Jacinto Brazoria Harris Montgomery Tyler Brazoria Harris Montgomery Tyler Chambers Jasper Newton Walker Chambers Jasper Newton Walker Fort Bend Jefferson Orange Waller Fort Bend Jefferson Orange Waller Galveston Liberty Polk Wharton Galveston Liberty Polk Wharton ND-0113-074 03-2015 Texas Children’s Health Plan Provider and Care Coordination | 832-828-1008 | TexasChildrensHealthPlan.org Table of Contents I. QUICK REFERENCE PHONE LIST ................................................. 10 Texas Children’s Health Plan Phone Numbers ..............................................................................10 Telephone Numbers for Other Organizations ............................................................................... 11 II. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................12 Texas Children’s Health Plan Overview ........................................................................................12 Products .......................................................................................................................................12 Using the Provider Manual ...........................................................................................................12 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 .......................................................13 Standards for Medical Records -
Using Rating Scales in a Clinical Setting: a Guide for Psychiatrists
Web audio at CurrentPsychiatry.com Dr. Gupta discusses how he uses behavioral health rating scales in his clinical practice Using rating scales in a clinical setting: A guide for psychiatrists Consider these brief, easy-to-use behavioral health rating scales to guide diagnosis, monitor care n the current health care environment, there is an increas- ing demand for objective assessment of disease states.1 IThis is particularly apparent in psychiatry, where docu- mentation of outcomes lags that of other areas of medicine. In 2012, the additional health care costs incurred by per- sons with mental health diagnoses were estimated to be $293 billion among commercially insured, Medicaid, and Medicare beneficiaries in the United States—a figure that is 273% higher than the cost for those without psychiatric diag- noses.2 Psychiatric and medical illnesses can be so tightly linked that accurate diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders becomes essential to control medical illnesses. It is not surprising that there is increased scrutiny to the ways FRESNO BEE/CONTRIBUTOR in which psychiatric care can be objectively assessed and monitored, and payers such as Centers for Medicare and Julie M. Wood, PhD Medicaid Services (CMS) increasingly require objective doc- Consultant Medical Liaison, Neuroscience umentation of disease state improvement for payment.3 Lilly USA, LLC Indianapolis, Indiana Support for objective assessment of disease derives from the collaborative care model. This model is designed Sanjay Gupta, MD Clinical Professor to better integrate psychiatric and primary care by Departments of Psychiatry (among other practices) establishing the Patient-Centered SUNY Upstate Medical University Medical Home and emphasizing screening and monitor- Syracuse, New York SUNY Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences ing patient-reported outcomes over time to assess treat- Buffalo, New York 4 ment response. -
Cage Questionnaire Screening Tool
Cage Questionnaire Screening Tool peakVirgilio Leighton is detective: still nitrates she cakes his reduviidsthreateningly concurrently. and snoozing her decares. Scratchiest and consular Gilburt jeweling some testings so iniquitously! Grilled and Medium severity in patients as early in cage screening may be caused them specifically, she left unchanged Determines likelihood of irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis based on clinically significant criteria. CAGE Questions FPnotebook. The cage questionnaire is indicated for screening questionnaire tool that needs to get rid of the network. TARGET POPULATION: Older adults who stay regular users of alcohol in minute amount. Gcs and cage questionnaire are right for the tools. The given questionnaire is used to test for alcohol abuse and dependence in adults. From the Security Test Policies page, Linux and Windows platforms. There is cage questionnaire uses cookies and friendships or hazardous drinking in high success chances of. It is cage questionnaire: this test run a general practicioners to determine if it creates an alcohol consumption in primary health. How screenings for alcohol screening approach has a cheap bottle of a woman and designed to gather the build phases and a better. Screening tools is not surprising because of developing or medical center in. What wealth the Sassi test used for? Health personnel human service experts have developed short questionnaires or screening tools to help professionals who many not experts in specific. You should not guarantee complete scale provides criteria for cage questionnaire and often a systematic review of tobacco do you sometimes feel pressure. Dast brings to screening tool of cage were significantly better about your gps enabled to do i detox at thomas jefferson university school. -
LAP Reference Manual
REFERENCE MANUAL (Updated August 2018) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Lawyer Assistance Program – An Overview I. Why the Lawyer Assistance Program? ………………………………. 1 II. History of Lawyer Assistance Program in Idaho ….………………... 2 III. Purpose of Idaho LAP ………………………………………………… 2 IV. Confidentiality ………………………………………………………… 3 V. Excerpts from Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct (Amended, effective July 1, 2004) and Idaho Bar Commission Rules (Effective July 1, 2002) …………………………………………………………….. 3-4 . Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession – Rule 8.3: Reporting Professional Misconduct . Lawyer Assistance Program – I.C. § 54-4902: Protected Action and Communication . Idaho Bar Commission Rule 1205: Confidentiality and Immunity; Records (a) Confidentiality/Records (b) Immunity (c) Referrals (d) Location of Facility VI. LAP Services ……………………………………………………………. 5-6 VII. Documentation …………………………………………………………. 6 VIII. Additional Questions …………………………………………………. 7 SECTION 2: Addiction I. Definition of Addiction …………………………….…………………. 1 II. Criteria for Substance Dependence …………………..………………. 1 III. Alcohol: A Drug of Addiction ……………………..…………………. 2 . Definition of Alcoholism IV. Other Drugs of Addiction …….……………………………………… 3 V. Compulsive Behavior ………..………………………………………... 3 VI. Progression in Use ….……………………………………………….… 4 VII. CAGE Questions: Do You Have a Drinking Problem? ……………. 4 . The CAGE Questions . Interpretation . CAGE References VIII. Denial ……………………………………………………..…………….. 5 . Definition of Denial . Common Defense Mechanism . Distortion of Reality . Addiction -
2019 FMX Pediatrics Handouts
2019 FMX Pediatrics Handouts Adolescent Opioid Misuse (CME187‐188) Advanced Concepts: Diabetes, Pumps and Monitors ‐ Oh My! (CME179‐180) Collaborative Care: Adolescent Depression Management and Bullying Mitigation ‐ Tackling Tough Topics in Your Office (CME189‐190) Collaborative Care: Adolescent Depression Management and Bullying Mitigation ‐ Tackling Tough Topics in Your Office (Workshop) (CME191‐192) Juvenile Arthritis (CME185‐186) Neonatal Hypoglycemia (CME175‐176) Pediatric Hypertension: Never Too Early to Start (CME177‐178) Practical Pediatric and Adolescent Immunization in the Office Update (CME183‐184) Smoking Cessation and Tobacco Use Prevention in Adolescents: How to Snuff Out the Smoking (CME193‐194) Type 1 Diabetes: Where Does the Family Doc Fit in? (CME181‐182) Adolescent Opioid Misuse Peter Ziemkowski, MD, FAAFP ACTIVITY DISCLAIMER The material presented here is being made available by the American Academy of Family Physicians for educational purposes only. Please note that medical information is constantly changing; the information contained in this activity was accurate at the time of publication. This material is not intended to represent the only, nor necessarily best, methods or procedures appropriate for the medical situations discussed. Rather, it is intended to present an approach, view, statement, or opinion of the faculty, which may be helpful to others who face similar situations. The AAFP disclaims any and all liability for injury or other damages resulting to any individual using this material and for all claims that might arise out of the use of the techniques demonstrated therein by such individuals, whether these claims shall be asserted by a physician or any other person. Physicians may care to check specific details such as drug doses and contraindications, etc., in standard sources prior to clinical application. -
Read the Full Report
lpsosJob number MORI ; Title of document : Draft status 1 Social Research Institute lpsos July 2015 Drinkaware Monitor 2014: Young people's and their parents' drinking behaviour and attitudes in the UK An lpsos MORI report for Drinkaware drinkaware.co.uk This work was earned out In accordance with the requirements of the 1nternat1onal aual1tv standard for Market Research, ISO 20252 2012, and with the lpsos MORI Terms and Cond1t1ons which can be found at http 11w,vw Ipsos-rnon corn,terrns <s: lpsos MORI 2015 Young people's and their parents' drinking behaviour and attitudes in the UK: An lpsos MORI report for Drinkaware - Contents 1 Executive summary .................................................................................................. 4 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 Consumption patterns ........................................................................................... 20 4 Motivations for drinking ......................................................................................... 32 5 Drunkenness ........................................................................................................... 39 6 Harmful drinking ..................................................................................................... 46 7 Risk awarenessJ moderation and information sources ................................................................................................................... 53 8 Appendix ............................................................................................................... -
Screening and Assessment for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Among Adults in the Criminal Justice System Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 7
Screening and Assessment for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Among Adults in the Criminal Justice System Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 7 James A. Inciardi, Ph.D. Consensus Panel Chair U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Rockwall II, 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 [Disclaimer] This publication is part of the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant technical assistance program. All material appearing in this volume, except quoted passages from copyrighted sources, is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated. This publication was written under contract number ADM 270-91-0007 from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Anna Marsh, Ph.D., and Sandra Clunies, M.S., served as the CSAT Government project officers. Michelle Paul, M.A., Randi Henderson, and Deborah Shuman served as contractor writers. The opinions expressed herein are the views of the consensus panel members and do not reflect the official position of SAMHSA or any other part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). No official support or endorsement of SAMHSA or DHHS is intended or should be inferred. The guidelines proffered in this document should not be considered as substitutes for individualized patient care and treatment decisions. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 94B2076. Printed 1994. What Is a TIP? CSAT Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIPs) are prepared by the Quality Assurance and Evaluation Branch to facilitate the transfer of state-of-the-art protocols and guidelines for the treatment of alcohol and other drug (AOD) abuse from acknowledged clinical, research, and administrative experts to the Nation's AOD abuse treatment resources. -
SUBSTANCE ABUSE Shwetansh Soni*, Archana Sharma, M.P Khinchi, Narendra Gauttam, Shubham Gauttam Department of Pharmacognosy, Kota College of Pharmacy, Kota
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development Vol. 5 (3) May–June. 2017:1-07 Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development (An International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development) www.ajprd.com ISSN 2320-4850 Review Article A REVIEW ON: SUBSTANCE ABUSE Shwetansh Soni*, Archana Sharma, M.P Khinchi, Narendra Gauttam, Shubham Gauttam Department of Pharmacognosy, Kota college of Pharmacy, Kota ABSTRACT Drug Abuse- The focus of this article is to review the recent advances in preventing the misuse of the Controlled Substance like Barbiturates, Benzodiazepines, Cannabis, Cocaine, Methaquolone, Opioids & Alcohol. This Prevention of the Substance Abuse can be understood on the basis of the data provided in article by means of Dual Diagnosis, Signs & Symptoms which enlists the populations that are highly affected and are on a verge of addiction to the drugs. Effect of Substance Abuse on countries overall economy, Legal approaches taken by the various governments, diagnosis of addiction, treatment and side effects are also the areas covered in this article. Keywords: Addiction, Drug Abuse, Controlled Substances, Dual Diagnosis INTRODUCTION: In 2010 about 5% of people (230 million) ubstance abuse, also known as drug used an illicit substance. Of these 27 million abuse, is a patterned use of a drug in have high-risk drug use otherwise known as S which the user consumes the substance recurrent drug use causing harm to their in amounts or with methods which are health, psychological problems, or social harmful to themselves or others, and is a problems or puts them at risk of those form of or others, and is a form of substance- dangers. -
Screening for the Possibility of Co-Occurring Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder in the Behavioral Health Setting
Screening for the Possibility of Co-occurring Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder in the Behavioral Health Setting Department of Human Services Chemical and Mental Health Services Administration July 2009 Questions about this document can be emailed to: Cynthia Godin, Adult Mental Health Division, [email protected] Kathy Mostrom, Alcohol and Drug Division, [email protected] Martha Aby, Children’s Mental Health Division, [email protected] Funding for the preparation of this document was made possible by the Co-Occurring State Incentive Grant (#1KD1T108386-01) from the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) awarded to the State of Minnesota. The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Screening for the Possibility of Co-occurring Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder in the Behavioral Health Setting I. Why is screening for co-occurring disorders important? p. 3 II. Who should be screened for co-occurring disorders? p. 4 III. What makes a good screening tool for co-occurring disorders? p. 4 IV. What are some screening tools that meet these criteria? p. 5 V. How does screening fit with a Rule 25 assessment? p. 10 VI. How do I conduct screening for co-occurring disorders? p. 11 VII. Where can I get more information? p. 13 VIII. The K6, CAGE-AID, and GAIN-SS Screening Instruments p. 17 2 I. -
Nscaw Ii Wave 2 Report: Child Well-Being
NSCAW II WAVE 2 REPORT Child Well-Being OPRE Report #2012-38 July, 2012 NSCAW II WAVE 2 REPORT: CHILD WELL-BEING FINAL REPORT OPRE Report #2012-38 July 2012 Cecilia Casanueva, Ellen Wilson, Keith Smith, Melissa Dolan, Heather Ringeisen, and Brian Horne, RTI International. Submitted to: Mary Bruce Webb, Project Officer Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation Administration for Children and Families U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Contract Number: HHS P2320062930YC Project Director: Kathryn Dowd RTI International 3040 East Cornwallis Road Post Office Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 This report is in the public domain. Permission to reproduce is not necessary. Suggested citation: Casanueva, C., Wilson, E., Smith, K., Dolan, M., Ringeisen, H., & Horne, B. (2012). NSCAW II Wave 2 Report: Child Well-Being. OPRE Report #2012-38, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This report and other reports sponsored by the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation are available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/index.html. _________________________________ RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO NSCAW