European Parliament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Parliament EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS Notice to members 1/2004 19 December 2003 Report of the Employment Committee Delegation to Dublin Meeting with the Irish Presidency 24-25 November 2003 The delegation had a one and half-day programme. On the first day, Monday 24 November, the delegation met with Dick Roche, Minister for EU Affairs and visited an IT training project (Fastrack into Information Technology). On Tuesday 25 November, the delegation met with Ministers Frank Fahey (Labour Affairs) and Mary Coughlan (Social and Family Affairs), with representatives of the Social Partners and also held a meeting with members of the Committee on Enterprise and Small Business as well as the Committee on Social and Family Affairs. Monday 24 November 2003 p.m. The EMPL delegation started with a briefing on the political, economic and social situation in the country by the head of the European Parliament's office in Ireland, Mr James O'Brien. The meeting with Minister Roche focused on the Lisbon agenda and the need to making the EU more jobs friendly. The Minister stressed the importance attached to the KOK report and to unrestricted access to the single market. Regarding the IGC he was steadfast in his defence of the need to maintain unanimity in the area of taxation and criticised the idea of a "passerelle" as not very democratic. He highlighted the danger of moving up in the tax rate to the detriment of consumption (and employment) in the case of harmonisation of the tax rates. Members argued that by maintaining tax competition there is the possibility of a loss of revenue that could benefit social programmes. The Minister stressed the need to address the challenge of bridging the divide between the citizen and the EU. He invited the European Parliament to contribute in developing an initiative focused on creating linkages with the citizen. CM\480025EN.doc PE 324.364 Or. EN EN EN Fastrack into Information Society (FIT) The presentation of this programme offered an example of partnership between government and business. The programme aims at the integration of disadvantaged persons into the labour market and addresses the changing profile of jobs by offering specific training on IT skills. The programme runs on a voluntary basis with the involvement of more than 70 organisations, while individual participants to the programme retain their allowances (unemployment or other). This programme offers an example of CSR that has met considerable success in combating the digital divide. Tuesday 25 November 2003 The meeting with Ministers Frank Fahey and Mary Coughlan, offered an overview of the Irish Presidency's priorities in the field of labour and social affairs (see draft programme in the annex). These focus on rendering employment attractive (make work pay), preparing the workplace of the future and working towards an "achievable" agenda for Lisbon. On the legislative side, the importance of concluding work on 1408/71 was stressed. Minister Coughlan indicated that a political agreement should be reached by 1st December and that work on the annexes should also be concluded by 22 December so as to facilitate the presentation of the Common Position to the EP. The Working Time Directive, for which the consultation of social partners is under way, will be discussed at the March Council, while the (eventual) revision of the European Works Council Directive will be also discussed at the Tripartite Social Summit. For the Temporary Workers Agency (TWA) the Ministers indicated that they did not expect any developments. Although Ireland is one of the four countries blocking the adoption of the Directive, the Ministers stressed that they support the flexibility that comes with it, as in Ireland many temporary workers are in the higher end of the market. They also stressed that these workers have the right to equal treatment under the Irish law. Meeting with the social partners The contacts with the Irish Business and Employers Confederation (IBEC) and the Irish Congress of Trade Unions highlighted the benefits brought by the social partnership model, which was introduced at the time of high unemployment. The combination of policies favouring foreign direct investment and a stable social environment contributed to the prosperity of the country. However, rapid economic development neglected the strengthening of some social services like childcare. This is recognised as one major hurdle in increasing the participation of women in the labour market. At the same time about 75% of part-time workers are women (a third of the whole female working population) and this situation explains partially the wage gap between men and women. The trade unions expressed some concern at the extension of the open method of coordination (OMC) beyond the general orientations for employment, as this may replace legislation thus weakening the interests of workers. Meeting with members of Parliament At the meeting with members of the Committee on Enterprise and Small Business and of the Committee on Social and Family Affairs, the issues of adequate social welfare and social protection were discussed. The work of the Convention and the position of the EP with regard to the need to guarantee the social rights in the Treaty were stressed by EMPL members. PE 324.364 2/8 CM\480025EN.doc Or. EN EN DELEGATION TO DUBLIN 24 - 25 November 2003 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Members: Mr. Theo BOUWMAN, Chairman Verts/ALE Mr. Bartho PRONK PPE-DE Mr. Carlo FATUZZO PPE-DE Mr. Proinsias DE ROSSA PSE Ms. Jillian EVANS Verts/ALE Mr. Brian CROWLEY UEN CM\480025EN.doc 3/8 PE 324.364 Or. EN EN DELEGATION TO DUBLIN 24 - 25 November 2003 DRAFT PROGRAMME MONDAY 24 NOVEMBER 2003 Morning Flight to Dublin 14.00 Meeting with the EP Information Office Dublin, Mr. James O'Brien 15.00 - 16.00 Meeting with Minister for EU Affairs, Government Buildings Merrion St, Dublin Dick Roche 2 16.30 - 17.30 FIT (Fastrack into Information AIB Bank Centre, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Technology) IT training project visit Contact:Peter Davitt 00353-1-868234006 19.00 Dinner hosted by Irish Business and Confederation House Employers Confederation (IBEC) 84-6 Lr Baggot St, Dublin 2 Contacts: Ray Farrelly, Maria Cronin, 00353-1-86 3812881, -87 2236816 TUESDAY 25 NOVEMBER 2003 09.30 - 10.30 Meeting with David Begg, General 31/32 Parnell Square, Dublin 2, Contact: Secretary of the Irish Congress of Eileen Sweeney, 00353-1-8897725 Trade Unions 12.00 Meeting with Minister for Labour Parliament offices Affairs, Frank Fahey and Minister for Leinster House, Dublin 2 Social and Family Affairs, Mary Coughlan 13.15 Lunch hosted Oireachtas Committee on Members Restaurant, Leinster House Enterprise and Small Business and Social and Family Affairs 15.00 - 16.00 Meeting with Oireachtas Committee on Parliament offices, Leinster House, Dublin Enterprise and Small Business 2, Contact: Rita Sexton 6183744 16.00 - 17.00 Meeting with Oireachtas Committee on Parliament offices Social and Family Affairs Leinster House WEDNESDAY 26 NOVEMBER 2003 Morning Departure for the airport PE 324.364 4/8 CM\480025EN.doc Or. EN EN Irish Presidency of the EU (1 January – 30 June 2004) DRAFT Programme in the areas of Employment, Social Policy and Equality KEY PRIORITIES Ireland’s Presidency comes at a time of great change for the European Union. Making a success of enlargement will be a key priority for the Irish Presidency. This will involve the successful integration of the new Member States into the workings of the Union and the extension of the Union’s policies to them. In pursuing sustainable social and economic growth, as set out in the Lisbon agenda, the central issues for the Irish Presidency will be to make employment a priority and to maintain a high level of social cohesion and social protection. The Presidency will advance the EU legislative programme in the areas of anti-discrimination and equal treatment. The draft programme set out below outlines the key priorities of the Irish Presidency in the areas of Employment, Social Policy and Equality. Although the detailed programme has not yet been finalised, the important issues to be dealt with during the Irish semester are as follows: 1. Taking Stock of Achievements under the Lisbon Objectives: The Irish Presidency, in co- operation with the Commission and the relevant committees, aims to present, for the first time, an integrated key messages paper to the Spring European Council in 2004. The key messages will reflect the Council’s work on Social Inclusion, Pensions, Demographic Developments, Making Work Pay, Gender Equality and the employment-related policy challenges addressed in the report of the Employment Task Force “Jobs, Jobs, Jobs; Creating More Employment in Europe” 2. European Employment Strategy. The Employment Guidelines and Broad Economic Policy Guidelines are now prepared as a co-ordinated and synchronised package, and the 2004 Spring European Council will provide the first opportunity to assess this new streamlined approach. The Employment Taskforce has undertaken an in-depth examination of key employment related policy challenges, and its recommendations will be addressed by the 2004 Spring European Council on the basis of the Joint Commission/Council Employment Report. 3. Co-ordination of Social Security for Migrant Workers. The Irish Presidency will actively continue the process of reform of Regulation 1408/71 with the aim of reaching agreement with the European Parliament before the end of its term in May. In co-operation with the Hungarian Government, a conference will be held in Budapest in May 2004, involving all 25 Member States, on the implications of the reform of the Regulation, and on the practical aspects of its implementation in the new Member States. 4. Social Dialogue makes a vital contribution to promoting a more job-intensive pattern of economic growth.
Recommended publications
  • Sunday Times /Behaviour & Attitudes European Elections May 2014
    Sunday Times /Behaviour & Attitudes European Elections May 2014 Opinion Poll 3rd – 15th May, 2014 Prepared for Prepared by Ian McShane J.5607 Technical Appendix 2 Technical Appendix ● The results of this opinion poll are based upon a representative sample of 1,545 eligible Irish voters aged 18 years +. ● A separate questionnaire was produced for each of three regions to take the three separate European Election constituencies into account. The number of interviews upon which the representative samples of eligible voters in each constituency is based is as follows: Dublin Constituency 521 Midlands-North-West 513 South Constituency 511 ● As such, the results for each constituency can be deemed to be accurate to within plus or minus 4.5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. ● Fieldwork was conducted over the period 3rd – 14th May, 2014 with interviewing carried out at the Behaviour & Attitudes Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) Unit at Milltown House in Dublin. ● Interviewing was conducted across all electoral constituencies in the country with households selected for interview by way of Random Digit Dialling (RDD). ● The sample is split across RDD landline numbers and RDD mobile telephone numbers, so as to ensure that individuals living in landline only households, mobile only households, and households with both a landline and mobile telephone are represented in their correct proportions. 3 Technical Appendix ● The subsequent survey results are weighted to reflect the known demographic profile of Irish adults, utilising the most recently published census population estimates from the Central Statistics Office (CSO). ● All aspects of the survey, including the Party Support adjustment factor, are implemented in accordance with the technical and ethical guidelines set down by the Association of Irish Market Research Organisations (AIMRO) and the European Society of Opinion & Market Research (ESOMAR).
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the Senate of the United Mexican States, Et
    No. 08-987 IN THE RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ON BEHALF OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES, THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PANAMA, MARY ROBINSON (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, 1997- 2002; PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, 1992-1997) AND LEGISLATORS FROM THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNTRIES OF BRAZIL, BELGIUM, CHILE, GERMANY, IRELAND, JAPAN, MEXICO, SCOTLAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM ______________ Michael Avery Counsel of Record Suffolk Law School 120 Tremont Street Boston, MA 02108 617-573-8551 ii AMICI CURIAE The Senate of the United Mexican States The National Assembly of Panama Mary Robinson (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1997-2002; President of Ireland, 1992-1997) Legislators from the European Parliament Josep Borrell Fontelles, former President Enrique Barón Crespo, former President Miguel Ángel Martínez, Vice-President Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Vice-President Luisa Morgantini, Vice-President Mia De Vits, Quaestor Jo Leinen, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs Richard Howitt, Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Guisto Catania, Vice-Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Willy Meyer Pleite, Vice-Chair of the Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly Edite Estrela, Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union
    Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union By Brian Harvey This document was commissioned by the Equality Authority and the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Equality Authority. Preface The European Union has played a valuable role in stimulating and shaping equality strategies in Ireland over the past three decades.The majority of key equality initiatives in Ireland can trace their origins to European Union directives, European case law or European Union action programmes. This influence continues to the present moment. However, innovation and ambition in our new equality legislation – the Employment Equality Act, 1998 and the Equal Status Act, 2000 – and our related equality institutions have changed this situation to one of mutual influencing. Europe now looks to the Irish experience of implementing a multi- ground equality agenda for learning. This publication provides an introductory briefing on approaches to equality at the level of the European Union – focusing on policy, institutions and funding programmes. It seeks to resource those who are engaging with the challenge to shape European Union policy and programmes in relation to equality. It aims to assist those addressing the impact of European Union policy and programmes on Ireland or to draw benefit from this influence. It is a unique document in bringing an integrated nine-ground equality focus to policy and programmes at European Union level.We are grateful to Brian Harvey for this work in drawing all this material together in this format.We are also grateful to Jenny Bulbulia B.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups
    European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Guide to the 30th Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups ‘EAPN Ireland is a network of groups and individuals working against poverty and social exclusion. Our objective is to put the fight against poverty at the top of the European and Irish agendas’ Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 2 The Parties 4 Dáil Session Guide 5 A Brief Guide to Legislation 7 Dáil Committees 9 The TD in the Dáil 9 Contacting a TD 12 APPENDICES 1: List of Committees and Spokespersons 2: Government Ministers and Party Spokespersons 1 Introduction This Guide has been produced by the European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland. It is intended as a short briefing on the functioning of the Dáil and a simple explanation of specific areas that may be of interest to people operating in the community/NGO sector in attempting to make the best use of the Dáil. This briefing document is produced as a result of the EAPN Focus on Poverty in Ireland project, which started in December 2006. This project aimed to raise awareness of poverty and put poverty reduction at the top of the political agenda, while also promoting understanding and involvement in the social inclusion process among people experiencing poverty. This Guide is intended as an accompanying document to the EAPN Guide to Understanding and Engaging with the European Union. The overall aim in producing these two guides is to inform people working in the community and voluntary sector of how to engage with the Irish Parliament and the European Union in influencing policy and voicing their concerns about poverty and social inclusion issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost at Sea Scheme
    Special Report by the Ombudsman LOST AT SEA SCHEME December 2009 LOST AT SEA SCHEME | Special Report by the Ombudsman Contents THIS REPORT 3 Part One SPECIAL Report TO each HOuSE Of THE Oireachtas - 6 THE REASOnS wHy. Appendices (A) Response of the Department of Agriculture, fisheries and food (the Department) to the Investigation Report -11 february 2009 10 (B) Response of the Ombudsman to the Department’s letter of 11 february 2009 - 13 March 2009 13 (C) Response of the Department to the Ombudsman’s letter of 13 March 2009 - 23 April 2009 15 (D) Response of the Ombudsman to the Department’s letter of 23 April 2009 - 5 June 2009 17 (E) Further Letter to the Ombudsman from the Department - 30 July 2009 20 Part Two InvESTIgation Report (nOvEMBER 2008) Introduction 25 1. The Complaint 25 2. Background 26 3. Preliminary Examination 27 4. Investigation Interviews 38 5. The Department’s files and Key Records 39 6. Evidence gathered During Interviews 47 7. Analysis of the Main Issues 58 1 LOST AT SEA SCHEME | Special Report by the Ombudsman 8. The Byrne family and the Lost at Sea Scheme 74 9. Findings 76 10. Recommendations 82 Appendices Appendix 1: The Lost at Sea Scheme 85 Appendix 2: Response of the Department of Communications, 87 Marine and natural Resources to the Statement of Complaint -31 July 2006 Appendix 3: Undated and unsigned file Memo 89 Appendix 4: Submission of the Department of Agriculture, 90 Fisheries and food in response to the Draft Investigation Report -3 July 2008 Appendix 5: Submissions of the former Minister for the Marine and 96 Natural Resources, frank fahey TD, in response to the Draft Investigation Report -14 May 2008 and 19 June 2008 2 LOST AT SEA SCHEME | Special Report by the Ombudsman This Report This Report describes one family’s (the Byrnes’) unsuccess- ful attempt for assistance under the Lost at Sea Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • State Involvement in the Magdalene Laundries
    This redacted version is being made available for public circulation with permission from those who submitted their testimonies State involvement in the Magdalene Laundries JFM’s principal submissions to the Inter-departmental Committee to establish the facts of State involvement with the Magdalene Laundries Compiled by1: Dr James M. Smith, Boston College & JFM Advisory Committee Member Maeve O’Rourke, JFM Advisory Committee Member 2 Raymond Hill, Barrister Claire McGettrick, JFM Co-ordinating Committee Member With Additional Input From: Dr Katherine O’Donnell, UCD & JFM Advisory Committee Member Mari Steed, JFM Co-ordinating Committee Member 16th February 2013 (originally circulated to TDs on 18th September 2012) 1. Justice for Magdalenes (JFM) is a non-profit, all-volunteer organisation which seeks to respectfully promote equality and advocate for justice and support for the women formerly incarcerated in Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries. Many of JFM’s members are women who were in Magdalene Laundries, and its core coordinating committee, which has been working on this issue in an advocacy capacity for over twelve years, includes several daughters of women who were in Magdalene Laundries, some of whom are also adoption rights activists. JFM also has a very active advisory committee, comprised of academics, legal scholars, politicians, and survivors of child abuse. 1 The named compilers assert their right to be considered authors for the purposes of the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000. Please do not reproduce without permission from JFM (e-mail: [email protected]). 2 Of the Bar of England and Wales © JFM 2012 Acknowledgements Justice for Magdalenes (JFM) gratefully acknowledges The Ireland Fund of Great Britain for its recent grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Copy of the Newsletter in Pdf Format
    1 Slave, Soumana (on the left) with her master Abdoulaye. Abalak, Niger. Photo: © ILOlCrozet M. Global Solidarity News No. 14 Summer 2009 In this Issue Edward Phelan and the ILO3 Colombia 7 ICTU Women’s Seminar 3 The Tamil People’s national rights8 The Big Read 3 €61,263 to rebuild Cuba 8 Global Solidarity Summer School3 Lesotho 8 Gaza feature 4 – 5 Forced Labour feature 9 Global Solidarity Champions 6 Climate Change and Social Justice10 – 11 2 Solidarity Committees The Solidarity committees (NI and ROI) continue to be the vital link between Congress and affiliates on solidarity issues. These committees work closely with the ICTU Global Solidarity to ensure that it reaches affiliated unions of Congress and meet regularly during the year. They continue to act as a link between ICTU Global Solidarity, their individual union, and the membership. These Committees encourage affiliates to engage with ICTU Global Solidarity and look to embed solidarity linking within trade union structure. Welcome A recent peer review of Irish Aid by the OECD Development Some affiliates (NIPSA, IMPACT, PSEU and Assistance Committee commends the Government for its ESBOA) have formed their own structures to “impressive growth” in overseas development assistance (ODA) from engage with international solidarity issues. 2003 to 2008. The DAC praises Ireland as “a champion in making aid more effective”, and the report says “The Irish Government is committed to meeting the United Nations ODA target of 0.7 per cent Republic of Ireland of GNI by 2012.” “The challenge for the Government is to reach these targets despite severe economic downturn and increased budgetary Stellan Hermansson pressure”.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Ireland Annu Al Report 2018
    INSURANCE IRELAND ANNUAL REPORT 2018 OUR STRENGTH LIES IN THE NUMBER AND DIVERSITY OF OUR MEMBERS & ADVOCACY NETWORK Non-Life Life MIT Accenture: Innovation Health PwC: International Knowledge Reinsurance 6 KPMG: and Captive COUNCILS Conduct & the Customer STRATEGIC5 ALLIANCE INED COMMITTEES50+ PARTNERS & WORKING GROUPS 130 Deloitte: MEMBERS Talent Global Federation of Insurance Associations EVENTS3 SUPPORTING0 ADVOCACY WITH OVER Professional 31 Services GLOBAL1 ASSOCIATE Insurance VOICE MEMBERS Europe 3,500 Legal ATTENDEES Services Insurance Underwriting Ireland Brussels Office INSURTECH1 ECOSYSTEM IFS InsurTech IDA Ireland Members SFI Enterprise CeADAR Adapt Ireland Insight GCRT 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS President’s Review 2 Chief Executive’s Review 3 Representing the Insurance Industry in Ireland 4 2018: A Warm-up For the Future of the EU 6 Events and Strategic Alliances 8 Sustainable Finance – the 2018 Journey 10 The InsurTech Landscape 13 An Overview of EIF2018 14 Life Council address by the Chair 16 Non-Life Council address by the Chair 17 International Council address by the Chair 18 Reinsurance and Captive Council address by the Chair 19 Health Council address by the Chair 20 INED Council address by the Chair 21 Insurance Ireland's Insurance Information Service 22 Insurance Confidential – Fighting Fraud 23 Insurance Ireland – Accenture Innovation Strategic Alliance Partnership 24 Insurance Ireland – Deloitte Talent Strategic Alliance Partnership 25 Insurance Ireland – KPMG Conduct And The Customer Strategic Alliance Partnership 26 Insurance
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Outcomes for the 2007 and 2011 Irish Elections Under a Different Electoral System
    Publicpolicy.ie Potential Outcomes for the 2007 and 2011 Irish elections under a different electoral system. A Submission to the Convention on the Constitution. Dr Adrian Kavanagh & Noel Whelan 1 Forward Publicpolicy.ie is an independent body that seeks to make it as easy as possible for interested citizens to understand the choices involved in addressing public policy issues and their implications. Our purpose is to carry out independent research to inform public policy choices, to communicate the results of that research effectively and to stimulate constructive discussion among policy makers, civil society and the general public. In that context we asked Dr Adrian Kavanagh and Noel Whelan to undertake this study of the possible outcomes of the 2007 and 2011 Irish Dail elections if those elections had been run under a different electoral system. We are conscious that this study is being published at a time of much media and academic comment about the need for political reform in Ireland and in particular for reform of the electoral system. While this debate is not new, it has developed a greater intensity in the recent years of political and economic volatility and in a context where many assess the weaknesses in our political system and our electoral system in particular as having contributed to our current crisis. Our wish is that this study will bring an important additional dimension to discussion of our electoral system and of potential alternatives. We hope it will enable members of the Convention on the Constitution and those participating in the wider debate to have a clearer picture of the potential impact which various systems might have on the shape of the Irish party system, the proportionality of representation, the stability of governments and the scale of swings between elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Title Page Vol 2
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) National self image: Celtic mythology in primary education in Ireland, 1924-2001 dr. Frehan, P.G. Publication date 2011 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): dr. Frehan, P. G. (2011). National self image: Celtic mythology in primary education in Ireland, 1924-2001. Eigen Beheer. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 Chapter 4. Appendix I. Ministers of Education 1919 – 2002. 66 8 Feb ‘33 Council (C/6) Minister Dates Time in Office Comment 9 Mar ’32 – 2 Jan ’33. 1. John J. O Kelly 26 Aug ’21 – 4 ½ months Non -Cabinet Minister / 2 nd 11. Thomas Derrig 8 Feb ’33 – 4 years & 5 8th Dail / 7th Executive (Sceilg) 9 Jan ‘22 Dail / 21 July ‘37 months Council (C/7) 1st Ministry (Pre-Treaty) 8 Feb ’33 – 14 June ’37.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Seanad E´ Ireann 1213
    79 SEANAD E´ IREANN 1213 De´ Ce´adaoin, 10 Nollaig, 2003 Wednesday, 10th December, 2003 10.30 a.m. RIAR NA hOIBRE Order Paper GNO´ POIBLI´ Public Business Tairiscintı´: Motions: 1. ‘‘Go gceadaı´onn Da´il E´ ireann na That Da´il E´ ireann approves the following Rialacha´in seo a leanas ina ndre´acht:— Regulations in draft:— Na Rialacha´in um Ghalair Bho´ lachta Bovine Diseases (Levies) Regulations, (Tobhaigh), 2003, 2003, ar leagadh co´ ipeanna dı´obh ina ndre´acht copies of which were laid in draft before the faoi bhra´id an Tı´ an 9u´ la´ de Nollaig, 2003. House on 9th day of December, 2003.’’ —Senator Mary O’Rourke. 2. ‘‘Go n-iarrann Seanad E´ ireann ar an That Seanad E´ ireann requests the Joint gComhchoiste um Dhlı´ agus Ceart, Com- Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence hionannas, Cosaint agus Cearta na mBan, and Women’s Rights, or a sub-Committee no´ ar Fhochoiste den Chomhchoiste sin, thereof, to consider, including in public ses- breithniu´ a dhe´anamh, lena n—a´irı´tear bre- sion, the Report of the Independent Com- ithniu´ i seisiu´ n poiblı´, ar an Tuarasca´il o´ n mission of Inquiry into the Dublin and gCoimisiu´ n Fiosru´ cha´in Neamhsplea´ch faoi Monaghan bombings, and to report back to bhuama´il Bhaile A´ tha Cliath agus Mhuine- Seanad E´ ireann within three months acha´in agus tuairisciu´ do Sheanad E´ ireann concerning: laistigh de thrı´ mhı´ maidir leis na nithe seo a leanas: — cibe´ acu a thugtar aghaidh sa Tuara- — whether the Report of the Indepen- sca´il o´ n gCoimisiu´ n Fiosru´ cha´in dent Commission of Inquiry into the Neamhsplea´ch faoi bhuama´il Bhaile Dublin and Monaghan bombings of A´ tha Cliath agus Mhuineacha´in i 1974 addresses all of the issues 1974 ar na saincheisteanna go le´ir a covered in the terms of reference of chuimsı´tear i dTe´armaı´ Tagartha an the Inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform Annual Report 2005
    An Roinn Dlí agus Cirt, Comhionannais agus Athchóirithe Dlí An RoinnDlíagusCirt,Comhionannais Working for a Safer Fairer Ireland Fairer Safer a for Working Equality Equality Human Rights Rights Human An Roinn Dlí Tuarascáil Bhliantúil Security agus Cirt, Social Inclusion Inclusion Social Comhionannais agus 2005 Athchóirithe Dlí European Union and International International and Union European Diversity Diversity Tackling Crime Crime Tackling Prisons and Probation & Welfare & Probation and Prisons Asylum, Immigration and Citizenship and Immigration Asylum, Courts Northern Ireland Northern Legal Aid Legal Bhliantúil2005 Tuarascáil Cúnamh Dlíthiúil Na Cúirteanna Tuaisceart Éireann Annual ReportAnnual 2005 Tearmann, Inimirce agus Saoránacht Príosúin agus Promhadh 7 Leas I nGleic leis an gCoiriúlacht An tAontas Eorpach agus Idirnáisiúnta Éagsúlacht 2005 and Law Reform Law and Slándáil Cuimsiú Sóisialta Justice, Equality Equality Justice, Annual Report Report Annual Comhionannas Department of of Department Cearta Daonna Ag Obair chun go mbeidh Éire níos Department Reform Equality and Law of Justice, Sábháilte agus níos Cothroime 30-01 12/06 (1,500) Brunswick Press Ltd. (17793) Ltd. Press Brunswick (1,500) 12/06 30-01 PRN A6/1739 PRN Pinebrook House, 71/74 Harcourt Street, Dublin 2 Dublin Street, Harcourt 71/74 House, Pinebrook Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform Law and Equality Justice, of Department Organisation Development Unit Development Organisation An Roinn Dlí agus Cirt, Comhionannais agus Athchóirithe Dlí from: obtained be may document this of Copies Oifig an Tánaiste7 Oifig an Ard-Rúnaí website. Department’s the on available is document This 94 Faiche Stiabhna, Baile Átha Cliath 2 An Roinn Dlí agus Cirt, Comhionannais agus Athchóirithe Dlí Teach Shruthán na Giúise, 71-74 Sráid Fhearchair, Baile Átha Cliath 2 Teil: 01 602 8202 Faics: 01 661 5461 70300 064 Tel: Lóghlao: 1890 221 227 Kerry Co.
    [Show full text]