Fall 2008 Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fall 2008 Newsletter Shore Lines News from Citizens for East Shore Parks Fall 2008 Yes on Measure WW means Yes for Parks! Measure WW — EBRPD open space bond measure extension In November voters in The extension will authorize Alameda and Contra Costa another 20 years of continued counties will again have a funding for 67 current and future parks, open space, and chance to Say Yes to Parks! projects. Of the revenue Measure WW will preserve raised, 25 percent will benefit vanishing open space and shore- local parks and recreation line and help communities meet projects, while 75 percent will their recreational needs. fund regional park acquisition and development, open space In 1988 voters approved bond preservation, and habitat Measure AA, which allowed the restoration. • San Pablo Bay Shoreline (above): East Bay Regional Park District CESP is particularly focused on $855,000 to acquire, restore, and to establish our current network the following shoreline areas: provide public access. of parklands, recognized as one Although public support for Mea- of the best of any urban region • Eastshore State Park: $27 sure WW is already high, the in the U.S. million to restore and expand while completing segments of proposition requires a 2/3 YES vote That measure provided funds to the Bay Trail from Alameda and Contra Costa secure 34,000 acres, created 17 • Point San Pablo/Point Molate: County residents to pass. new parks and facilities, and $4.5 million to acquire and CESP strongly supports the con- added more than 100 miles of restore the shoreline, complete tinuation of a modest tax that has trails. Since the 1988 measure Bay Trail already been in place for 20 years. In expires this year, future park • North Richmond wetlands: the face of a growing population, projects depend on its extension. $3.6 million to preserve marshes determined developers, and a de- and develop public access for mand for parks and open space, Measure WW will authorize education programs and wildlife Measure WW is vital to preserv- total bond sales of $500 million. viewing ing the East Bay’s precious shore- Importantly, if approved, the • Point Pinole: $7.5 million to line and wildlife habitat. property tax rate will not in- develop new road, parking, More information and updates crease beyond its current tax rate recreational areas, visitor center, of 0.01% per year– $10 per year, about Measure WW are available maintenance facilities; complete at www.YesForParks.org. per $100,000 assessed valuation. park boundary; and restore wetlands The mission of Citizens for East Shore Parks is to preserve and enhance the natural resources, and recreational and educational opportunities of the east shore of San Francisco Bay, creating a necklace of shoreline parks from the Oakland Estuary to the Carquinez Strait. 2 Shore Lines On the Horizon for CESP News from Citizens from Patricia Jones, Executive Director for East Shore Parks Dear Friends of Shoreline Parks! from the Oakland Estuary to the Carquinez PO Box 6087, Albany, CA 94706 Strait? Office: 520 El Cerrito Plaza Welcome to the second edition of our news- [email protected] letter, Shore Lines. In this issue you will find CESP continues its work with Richmond T 510-524-5000 F: 524-5008 news about the work CESP has been doing to community activists to promote parks and www.eastshorepark.org protect our shoreline, what’s on open space as the preferred Dwight Steele the “Horizon” and how you can “I played around our alternative in Richmond’s Emeritus Chair get involved. yard some and talked general plan. City Council (1914 - 2002) will be back in session in But first, I want you to relax to the fence posts, September and will no doubt Robert Cheasty and take your time to think sung songs and made engage the question of President back about how much FUN you the weeds grow…” which option is to be pre- Norman La Force had as a kid playing outside. - Woody Guthrie ferred for developing the Vice President Which visions come to mind? The first required environmental impact report. The Hon. Tom Bates rush of the surf hitting you and the smell of City’s final decision about workshops re- Vice President salt in your nose and mouth? Building a tree quested by the Planning Commission is Sylvia McLaughlin house in the backyard or a fort in the nearby unclear. Secretary trees where you imagined all sorts of sce- narios? Just lying in the grass watching the We are happy to report that our North Doris Sloan flight of dragonflies or lightning bugs? Richmond outreach activities have again been Recording Secretary Perhaps you were more scientific and you supported by Ed Bennett caught tadpoles in the creek and watched grants from the Treasurer them grow. Makes you nostalgic, doesn’t it? San Francisco Foundation and Board of Directors Guess what? Kids today don’t share those the Richard and Teddi Baggins experiences. Many are simply afraid to go Rhoda Goldman Ellen Barth outside and others “experience” nature Fund. Hon. Ken Bukowski through the television or computers. Shirley Dean CESP is especially grateful to Nancy Strauch This conclusion and more compelling infor- for her efforts to secure grant funding for our Patty Donald mation is shared in Richard Louv’s book, Last work to preserve places for kids to play and Whitney Dotson Child in the Woods–Saving Our Children from explore. Arthur Feinstein Nature-Deficit Disorder. The name says it all. Steve Granholm Louv concludes it is “free play” as described There is much more to do, and we cannot do Larry Kolb it without you! Active volunteers are what above that is most beneficial to the mental Vicki Lee development and safety of children in the makes CESP successful. David Lewis modern world. “Natural Our successes also depend upon the financial Mark Liolios play strengthens support we get from our friends. Your tax- Rich McClure children’s self-confi- deductible contributions are crucial to the dence, and arouses their Kitty McLean work that CESP does to create a world- senses–their awareness Hon. Betty Olds class necklace of shoreline parks along of the world and all that Doria Robinson San Francisco Bay. We are grateful for your moves in it, seen and Eli Saddler help. unseen.” Rich Walkling Peter Weiner What better way to facilitate “play” for local children (of all ages) than to achieve CESP’s Executive Director Advisory Board goal to create a necklace of shoreline parks Stana Hearne Samantha Murray Supporting organizations include: Golden Gate Audubon Society • Sierra Club • Save the Bay • NRSOSA Oakland Waterfront Coalition • Berkeley Partners for Parks • California Native Plant Society Nancy Strauch Environmental Defense • Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge • Friends of Aquatic Park Oceanic Society • Regional Parks Association • Urban Creeks Council • Contra Costa Hills Club Executive Director California State Parks Foundation • Citizens for the Albany Shoreline • Ecology Center Patricia V. Jones Could Golden Gate 3 Fields be sold? by Brian Parker, Albany Waterfront Committee Chair As the City of Albany proceeds with plans to engage the community in a comprehensive Waterfront Visioning Process, Magna Entertainment Corp, the owners of the privately held waterfront lands at Golden Gate Fields, face financial turmoil. According to recent financial disclosures, Magna posted a loss of $21.3 million in the second quarter of 2008, with losses totaling $67.7 million year-to-date, and an accumulated deficit of $577.8 million. For the past year Magna has tried to sell off half of its racetracks to reduce accumulating debt that threatens the corporation’s future. These offerings were characterized as sales of “fringe Albany waterfront planning update assets and smaller tracks”, and Golden by Brian Parker, Albany Waterfront Committee Chair Gate Fields is not among the properties for sale. On July 8th Fern Tiger, principal of As part of the groundwork to craft a Magna’s goal is to sell enough properties Fern Tiger Associates (FTA), presented planning process responsive to to lower the debt to the point they can a progress report to the Albany Water- Albany’s unique local circumstances, handle the remaining payments while front Committee. After only two months they have interviewed 50 people, breaking even. This asset sale plan has on the task, FTA has made substantial including Council members, City staff, been largely unsuccessful because of poor progress on the public phase of the Waterfront Committee members, real estate market conditions. Waterfront Visioning Process. Planning Commissioners, environ- mental and community leaders, and On August 6, Magna announced that The firm has gathered and reviewed other Albany residents. another track sale might be in the offing. earlier plans and City documents, includ- A press release detailing the company’s ing relevant technical studies, meeting FTA has also had discussions with Golden Gate Fields’ local manage- second-quarter financials said that the minutes, and materials from the last ment and is reaching out to meet and sale of certain assets was being “recon- election. sidered,” and it was widely assumed that engage Magna’s corporate leaders. certain previously disclosed tracks Magna In early September FTA will brief the had placed on the market might be Albany’s planning efforts are driven by City Council and the Albany Water- withdrawn. Frank Stronach, Interim a deep concern that new development front Committee on additional details CEO and controlling shareholder of plans will be proposed by Magna for of planned work. They will continue Magna, instead said the company might Golden Gate Fields or grow out of its outreach to the community and City be willing to sell up to 60% of Santa sale to another owner.
Recommended publications
  • Sample Ballot and Voter Information Pamphlet General Election TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2010
    Sample Ballot and Voter Information Pamphlet General Election TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2010 WARNING: THE LOCATION OF YOUR POLLING PLACE MAY HAVE CHANGED " # !! ! +%!0+7!0* .30!++.2 .,/+%2%+7.--%#22(%00.5%622. .30!-$)$!2%.0 %!130%(.)#% 1%+!#*.0+3%!++/.)-2%--+7 Right .0,.120!#%17.30#(.)#%)1 "32&.0.2(%017.3,!7"% !"+%2.4.2%&.025..02(0%% #!-$)$!2%1 Wrong .3#!-4.2%&.0&%5%0 #!-$)$!2%12(!-!++.5%$ $ $ &7.34.2%&.0 !-$)$!2%12(!-!++.5%$ 7.304.2%1)-2(!20!#% 5)++ 8-+74.2%1&.050)2%)-#!-$)$!2%1!0%#.3-2%$.."2!)-!+)12.&2(% 0)2%-!-$)$!2%1#!++ .04)1)2.305%"1)2%!2555!#'.4.0'0.4 ! ! .,/+%2%+7.--%#22(%00.5%622.2(%0)2%)-)-% 00.5 YOU WILL RECEIVE THREE BALLOT CARDS Voters in the cities of Berkeley, Oakland and San Leandro will receive three ballot cards for the upcoming November 2, 2010 General Election. Ballots will consist of cards A, B and C. The ballot cards you will receive in the mail or at your polling place can be viewed in your voter information pamphlet or online at www.acgov.org/rov ADDITIONAL POSTAGE REQUIRED Important Note: An estimated minimum postage of 78¢ cents is Required to return your Vote By Mail ballot envelope by mail. 3BCN INFORMATION FOR VOTERS WITH DISABILITIES The Alameda County Registrar of Voters has made every effort to locate acces- sible polling places for all elections. The accessibility of your polling place is shown on the back cover of this sample ballot by the words, “YES” and “NO” print- ed below the disability symbol.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Phil Kamlarz, City Manager Submitted By: Deanna Despain, City Clerk Subject: Minutes for Approval
    Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 18, 2010 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Phil Kamlarz, City Manager Submitted by: Deanna Despain, City Clerk Subject: Minutes for Approval RECOMMENDATION Approve the minutes for the Council meetings of April 20, 2010 (special and regular), April 27, 2010 (special and regular), April 29 (special) and May 4, 2010 (special and regular). CONTACT PERSON Deanna Despain, City Clerk, 981-6900 Attachments: 1. April 20, 2010–Special City Council Meeting 2. April 20, 2010–Regular City Council Meeting 3. April 27, 2010–Special City Council Meeting 4. April 27, 2010–Regular City Council Meeting 5. April 29, 2010–Special City Council Meeting 6. May 4, 2010–Special City Council Meeting 7. May 4, 2010–Regular Council Meeting 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/manager Attachment 1 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2010 5:30 P.M. Council Chambers – 2134 Martin Luther King Jr. Way Tom Bates, Mayor Councilmembers: DISTRICT 1 – LINDA MAIO DISTRICT 5 – LAURIE CAPITELLI DISTRICT 2 – DARRYL MOORE DISTRICT 6 – SUSAN WENGRAF DISTRICT 3 – MAX ANDERSON DISTRICT 7 – KRISS WORTHINGTON DISTRICT 4 – JESSE ARREGUIN DISTRICT 8 – GORDON WOZNIAK Preliminary Matters Roll Call: 5:32 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Anderson, Arreguin, Capitelli, Maio, Moore, Wengraf, Worthington, Wozniak and Mayor Bates. Absent: None. Public Comment – Items on this agenda only: 11 Speakers. Public Hearing: 1. 3095 Telegraph Avenue (Continued from March 23, 2010) From: City Manager Recommendation: Conduct and complete a continued public hearing and either: 1 Adopt a Resolution approving Administrative Use Permit (AUP) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens for East Shore Parks Remarks by Robert Cheasty
    Citizens for East Shore Parks Remarks by Robert Cheasty, President On the Occasion of the Dedication of the Berkeley Meadow Honoring Sylvia McLaughlin & Dwight Steele Dwight and Sylvia are friends to all of us here today and benefactors to our entire society. Great deeds are not casually done. They require a lifetime of preparation and an heroic level of commitment to making a difference. Many make contributions. That is the way of great and thriving societies. Whole democracies are built around those who contribute. They are the safe harbors that gather the rest of us, that provide the infrastructure for community, that provide the confidence and security for commerce, education, the growth and nuturance of our children and the arts. And I call upon us all to bless these contributors for the interruptions of their lives to give something back to their communities. But then there are those who rise above contribution. There are those for whom who a contribution is just a wake up call, for whom contribution just whets the appetite for seeing what is really possible. There are those who, in borrowed words, ask not why the world is the way it is but why it is not the way it could be. And this then becomes the fulcrum for the changes they seek. These brave souls begin to realize what it means to overcome the 30,000 foot elevations where true societal change is made. For most just survival is all one can muster at that height. For the visionaries who change our society, 30,000 feet is where you get to work.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Candidate Statements
    Candidate for MAYOR I, JESSE ARREGUIN, hereby declare that I am a candidate for an elective office in the City of Berkeley, and make the following statement: 1. That my name is Jesse Arreguín 2. The office for which I am a candidate is Mayor 3. That my residence is 1528 Henry Street, Berkeley, CA 94709 4. The place of my birth is Fresno, CA 5. My present occupation is Mayor, City of Berkeley 6. I have held the following public offices: Mayor, City of Berkeley; President, Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG); Chair, ABAG Housing Methodology Committee; Joint ABAG-MTC Governance Committee; Bay Area Regional Collaborative; Alternate Commissioner, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission; Commissioner, Alameda County Transportation Commission; East Bay Community Energy Board of Directors, Alameda County Waste Management Authority; East Bay Regional Sports Fields JPA; 2x2 Committee of the City Council and Board of Education; 4x4 Committee on Housing, City Council/Rent Stabilization Board; 3x3 Committee of the Berkeley City Council and Berkeley Housing Authority; Councilmember, City of Berkeley, District 4; Commissioner, Rent Stabilization Board; Zoning Adjustments Board; Planning Commission; Housing Advisory Commission; Downtown Area Plan Advisory Committee. 7. Record of community service: Bernie Sanders Delegate to the DNC; Berkeley Tenants Union, Berkeley Progressive Alliance, Sierra Club Northern Alameda County Group. 8. I am a taxpayer in the City of Berkeley. 9. In 2016 you entrusted me to be Mayor of this exceptional city. It's an honor to lead a community that always stands for democracy, equity, and justice. Nobody could have imagined the challenges we've faced.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Statement (Pdf)
    Candidate for CITY AUDITOR I, ANN-MARIE HOGAN, hereby declare that I am a candidate for an elective office in the City of Berkeley, and make the following statement: 1. That my name is Ann-Marie Hogan. 2. The office for which I am a candidate is City Auditor. 3. For residence information, please contact the City Clerk Department, 981-6900. 4. The place of my birth is Jersey City, New Jersey. 5. My present occupation is City Auditor. 6. I have held the following public offices: City Auditor, City of Berkeley. 7. Record of community service: National Association of Local Government Auditors Advocacy Committee; League of Women Voters BAE; Sierra Club; OWL; Secretary, NWPC-AN; Finance Committee of American Friends Service Committee. 8. I am a taxpayer in the City of Berkeley. 9. As your elected City Auditor, I have defended your interests by increasing oversight, improving efficiency, and ensuring appropriate use of public funds. My office has audited City Council expense accounts; investigated and documented the City’s failure to bill and collect substantial amounts of grant money owed the City, and developed a plan to reduce lost earnings; identified and collected over $1.9 million in under-reported licensing revenue; and surveyed the practices of more than twenty Police departments across the country to help Berkeley police address current staffing shortages and future budget challenges. I have also partnered with Vista College and City staff to teach accounting classes for City employees. With your support, I will continue working on your behalf to identify and analyze City problems in the effort to improve our City’s performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Daily Californian, July 1991-June 1994
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf4f59n7s5 No online items Inventory of Index to the Daily Californian, July 1991-June 1994 Processed by William M. Roberts University Archives. The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-2933 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/BANC/UARC © 2000 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Inventory of Index to the Daily 1 Californian, July 1991-June 1994 Inventory of Index to the Daily Californian, July 1991-June 1994 University Archives, The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: University Archives The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-2933 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/BANC/UARC/ Processed by: William M. Roberts Date Completed: July 1994 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 2000 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Index to the Daily Californian, Date (inclusive): July 1991-June 1994 Creator: Daily Californian Repository: The Bancroft Library. University Archives. Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Languages Represented: English Access There are no restrictions on the use of the index. Publication Rights Copyright has not been assigned to The Bancroft Library. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Head of Public Services. Permission for publication is given on behalf of The Bancroft Library as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making and Un-Making of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: a Case in Megaproject Planning and Decisionmaking
    UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research Title The Making and Un-Making of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: A Case in Megaproject Planning and Decisionmaking Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6g7695t8 Author Frick, Karen Trapenberg Publication Date 2005 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Making and Un-Making of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: A Case in Megaproject Planning and Decisionmaking by Karen Trapenberg Frick B.A. (University of California, Los Angeles) 1990 M.A. (University of California, Los Angeles) 1992 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in City and Regional Planning in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Martin Wachs, Chair Professor Elizabeth Deakin Professor Paul Groth Fall 2005 The Making and Un-Making of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: A Case in Megaproject Planning and Decisionmaking Copyright 2005 by Karen Trapenberg Frick Abstract The Making and Un-Making of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: A Case in Megaproject Planning and Decisionmaking by Karen Trapenberg Frick Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Martin Wachs, Chair After over a decade of debate, construction of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge’s eastern span finally began in 2002 at a current approximate cost estimate of $6 billion. The intense and controversial debate ranged from whether the bridge should be seismically retrofitted or replaced, how it should be designed, where it should be located, and how it should be funded.
    [Show full text]