DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground-Level Ozone in the 21St Century: Future Trends, Impacts And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground-Level Ozone in the 21St Century: Future Trends, Impacts And Edinburgh Research Explorer Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications Citation for published version: Fowler, D, Amann, M, Anderson, R, Ashmore, M, Cox, P, Depledge, M, Derwent, D, Grennfelt, P, Hewitt, N, Hov, O, Jenkin, M, Kelly, F, Liss, P, Pilling, M, Pyle, J, Slingo, J & Stevenson, D 2008, Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications. Royal Society Policy Document 15/08, vol. 15/08, RS1276 edn, The Royal Society, London. <http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2008/ground-level-ozone/> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications Science Policy REPORT 15/08 October 2008 Price £39 web royalsociety.org Cover image: Sunrise over the River Ganges in Varanasi, India showing a sunny and polluted sky, characteristic of photochemical smog. Courtesy of Dr Mhairi Coyle, CEH Edinburgh. Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications RS Policy document 15/08 Issued: October 2008 RS1276 ISBN: 978-0-85403-713-1 © The Royal Society, 2008 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: The Royal Society Science Policy 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG Tel 44 (0)20 7451 2500 Email [email protected] Web royalsociety.org Design by Franziska Hinz, London Copyedited and Typeset by Techset Composition Limited Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications Contents Membership of working group vii Executive summary ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is ground-level ozone and why does it matter? 2 1.2 Sources of ozone emissions and drivers of production now and in the future 2 1.3 Approaches to controlling ozone 3 1.4 Conduct of the study 4 2 The ground-level ozone policy context 5 2.1 Meeting the challenge – the current state of play 6 2.2 The effects of controls to date 7 2.3 International shipping and aviation 9 2.4 The role of science in meeting the ozone policy challenge 9 2.5 Conclusions 9 3 Ozone in the troposphere: processes of ozone production and destruction 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 The lifetime and atmospheric budget of tropospheric ozone 11 3.3 Ozone atmospheric chemistry 11 3.4 Surface ozone destruction processes – dry deposition to the land and ocean 17 3.5 Effects of weather and topography on ground-level ozone 18 3.6 Trends in ground-level ozone 20 3.7 Conclusions 21 4 Natural and anthropogenic emissions of ozone precursor compounds 23 4.1 Introduction 23 4.2 Sources of ozone precursors 23 4.3 Future emissions analysis 23 4.4 Gaps and uncertainties 39 4.5 Conclusions 39 5 Model projections of future ground-level ozone at global, regional and urban scales 41 5.1 Introduction 41 5.2 Global modelling 41 The Royal Society Ground-level ozone in the 21st century I October 2008 I iii 5.3 Regional modelling 50 5.4 Urban modelling 52 5.5 Uncertainties in model projections 54 5.6 Conclusions 54 6 Climate–ozone interactions 57 6.1 Introduction 57 6.2 Effects of weather and climate on background ozone levels 57 6.3 Effects of changes in weather on peak ozone episodes 60 6.4 Tropospheric ozone changes as a driver of climate change 64 6.5 Gaps and uncertainties 64 6.6 Conclusions 65 7 The effects of ozone on human health 67 7.1 Introduction 67 7.2 Mechanisms of ozone effects – how does ozone cause damage to human health? 67 7.3 Measuring and assessing the effects of ozone on human health 67 7.4 Current human health impacts 69 7.5 Future human health impacts: how significant will the effects of ozone on human health be over the next century? 73 7.6 Conclusion 74 8 Impacts of ozone on the environment 75 8.1 Introduction 75 8.2 Mechanisms and assessment of ozone effects on vegetation 75 8.3 The impacts of ozone on vegetation 77 8.4 How significant will the global impacts of ozone be on the environment over the next century? 81 8.5 Conclusions 84 9 The policy implications of projected changes in ozone concentrations over the 21st century 85 9.1 Emission controls 85 9.2 The implications of climate change for future ozone 86 9.3 Implications of future ozone projections for food security 86 9.4 Improving policy integration 87 9.5 Capacity building 90 9.6 Conclusions 90 10 Research and development 93 10.1 Ozone precursor emissions 93 10.2 Modelling 94 10.3 Evaluating human health impacts 95 10.4 Evaluating environmental impacts 95 10.5 Other research requirements 96 iv I October 2008 I Ground-level ozone in the 21st century The Royal Society 11 Conclusions and recommendations 99 11.1 Ground-level ozone as a global pollutant 99 11.2 Ground-level ozone chemistry – relevance to ozone control 99 11.3 Ground-level ozone in the future 99 11.4 The effects of climate change on future ozone concentrations 100 11.5 Impacts of ozone on human health 101 11.6 The environmental impacts of ozone 102 11.7 Improving ozone policy 102 11.8 Science and research needs 103 Acknowledgements 105 References 107 Annex 1 Glossary and abbreviations 119 Annex 2 Call for evidence response and workshop attendees 123 Annex 3 Specifications for the Royal Society 2050 chemistry–climate simulations 127 The Royal Society Ground-level ozone in the 21st century I October 2008 I v vi I October 2008 I Ground-level ozone in the 21st century The Royal Society Membership of working group The members of the working group involved in producing this report were as follows: Chair Professor David Fowler CBE FRS UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK Members Dr Markus Amann Head of the Atmospheric Pollution and Economic Development Program at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria Professor Ross Anderson FMedSci Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health and Honorary Consultant in Public Health Medicine, St George’s Hospital University of London, UK Professor Mike Ashmore Professor of Environmental Science, Environment Department, University of York, UK Professor Peter Cox Met Office Chair in Climate System Dynamics, University of Exeter, UK Professor Michael Depledge DSc Chair of Environment and Human Health Peninsula Medical School (Universities of Exeter and Plymouth) and Member of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, UK Professor Dick Derwent OBE Director, rdscientific, Honorary Professor in School of Geography and Environmental Sciences at the University of Birmingham, Part-time Professor in the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial College London and Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Life Sciences, King’s College London, UK Professor Peringe Grennfelt Scientific Director, IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd, Sweden Professor Nick Hewitt Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, UK Professor Oystein Hov Director of Research, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway Dr Mike Jenkin Principle Research Fellow, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Centre for Environment Policy, Imperial College, London, UK Professor Frank Kelly Professor of Environmental Health, Kings College London, UK Professor Peter Liss CBE FRS Professor in the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK Professor Mike Pilling CBE Professor of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, UK Professor John Pyle FRS Co-Director, National Center for Atmospheric Science and Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, UK Professor Julia Slingo OBE Director of Climate Research, National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Walker Institute, University of Reading, UK Dr David Stevenson Senior Lecturer in Atmospheric Modelling, Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, University of Edinburgh, UK Secretariat Ms Rachel Garthwaite Manager (Environment and Climate Change) Ms Rachel Newton Policy Officer (Environment and Climate Change) Ms Beverley Darkin Team Leader (Environment, Energy and Climate Change) The Royal Society Ground-level ozone in the 21st century I October 2008 I vii This report has been reviewed by an independent panel of experts and also approved by the Council of the Royal Society. Review Panel Sir David Read FRS Chair of Biological Secretary of the Royal Society and Emeritus Professor of Plant Sciences, Review Panel University of Sheffield Professor Ken Donaldson MRC and University of Edinburgh Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute Sir Brian Hoskins CBE FRS Director, Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London Professor Ivar Isaksen Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo Professor Terry Keating Office of Air & Radiation (OAR/OPAR), US Environmental Protection Agency Professor Nino Kuenzli ICREA Research
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History Group's Silver Jubilee
    History of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography Special Interest Group Newsletter 1, 2010 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS We asked in the last two newsletters if you Annual Report ........................................... 1 thought the History Group should hold an Committee members ................................ 2 Annual General Meeting. There is nothing in Mrs Jean Ludlam ...................................... 2 the By-Law s or Standing Orders of the Royal Meteorological Society that requires the The 2010 Summer Meeting ..................... 3 Group to hold one, nor does Charity Law Report of meeting on 18 November .......... 4 require one. Which papers have been cited? .............. 10 Don’t try this at home! ............................. 10 Only one person responded, and that was in More Richard Gregory reminiscences ..... 11 passing during a telephone conversation about something else. He was in favour of Storm warnings for seafarers: Part 2 ....... 13 holding an AGM but only slightly so. He Swedish storm warnings ......................... 17 expressed the view that an AGM provides an Rikitea meteorological station ................. 19 opportunity to put forward ideas for the More on the D-Day forecast .................... 20 Group’s committee to consider. Recent publications ................................ 21 As there has been so little response, the Did you know? ........................................ 22 Group’s committee has decided that there will Date for your diary .................................. 23 not be an AGM this year. Historic picture ........................................ 23 2009 members of the Group ................... 24 CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW OF 2009 by Malcolm Walker year. Sadly, however, two people who have supported the Group for many years died during I begin as I did last year. Without an enthusiastic 2009. David Limbert passed away on 3 M a y, and conscientious committee, there would be no and Jean Ludlam died in October (see page 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Climate
    UGAMP: A network of excellence in climate modelling and research Issue 27 October 2003 UGAMP Coordinator: Prof. Julia Slingo [email protected] Newsletter Editor: Dr. Glenn Carver [email protected] Newsletter website: acmsu.nerc.ac.uk/newsletter.html Contents NCAS News . 2 NCAS Websites . 3 NCAS Centres and Facilities . 3 UGAMP Coordinator . 4 CGAM Director . 4 ACMSU Director . 4 HPC Facilities . 5 New areas of UGAMP science 7 Chemistry-climate interactions . 19 Climate variability and predictability . 32 Atmospheric Composition . 48 Tropospheric chemistry and aerosols . 58 Climate Dynamics . 64 Model development . 72 Group News . 78 (for full contents see listing on the inside back cover) NERC Centres for Atmospheric Science, NCAS Alan Thorpe ([email protected]): Director NCAS Since the last UGAMP Newsletter there have been a significant number of NCAS developments relevant to the UK atmospheric science community. These include the following, which are particularly pertinent to the UGAMP community: • NERC have agreed to fund a new directed (new name for thematic) programme called “Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study” or SOLAS for short. • NERC have agreed to fund a “pump-priming” activity for a proposed new directed programme called Flood Risk from Extreme Events, FREE. The full proposal for FREE will be considered by NERC early in 2004. •NCAS is supporting a project to develop a new chemistry module for the HadGEM model. This is called UK-CHEM and Olaf Morgenstern at ACMSU is collaborating closely with the Hadley Centre on the project. •NCAS is supporting a project to develop the science for a new aerosol module for HadGEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners
    EPA’s Response to the Petitions to Reconsider the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Atmospheric Programs Climate Change Division Washington, D.C. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3.0 Process Issues Raised by Petitioners............................................................................................5 3.1 Approaches and Processes Used to Develop the Scientific Support for the Findings............................................................................................................................5 3.1.1 Overview..............................................................................................................5 3.1.2 Issues Regarding Consideration of the CRU E-mails..........................................6 3.1.3 Assessment of Issues Raised in Public Comments and Re-Raised in Petitions for Reconsideration...............................................................................7 3.1.4 Summary............................................................................................................19 3.2 Response to Claims That the Assessments by the USGCRP and NRC Are Not Separate and Independent Assessments.........................................................................20 3.2.1 Overview............................................................................................................20 3.2.2 EPA’s Response to Petitioners’
    [Show full text]
  • Smutty Alchemy
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of Professor Julia Slingo Dsc OBE Mr
    Presentation of Professor Julia Slingo DSc OBE Mr President It has been a turbulent week in the weather – high winds, lots of rain, highly changeable. Just the sort of thing that excites our distinguished guest, Professor Julia Slingo, Chief Scientist of the UK Met Office. Julia Slingo has been a leading figure in weather and climate research for more than 30 years. She has made profound contributions to the physics of the atmosphere and to the development of the computer models we use for prediction of weather, climate and climate change. Climate science is increasingly interdisciplinary, and she is playing a leading international role in setting the agenda for the physics of the climate system, how climate will change and our response to it. After completing a degree in Physics at University of Bristol, Julia went straight into the front line and moved to the Met Office. Her research focussed on the physics of clouds. Clouds play a key role in regulating Earth’s climate, and Julia Slingo’s pioneering work distilled important physical processes and developed methods for representing clouds in climate models, which are still in use today. It was during this first period at the Met Office that Julia met and married a fellow scientist, Tony Slingo. They worked together on many research topics and published important papers together. Tony died tragically after a sudden illness three years ago. It was a huge shock to everyone. I know that Julia has had tremendous support from their two daughters, Mary and Anna, and I am delighted that they have been able to join us for this celebration today.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Technology and the Planet: Harnessing Computing to Achieve Net Zero Issued: December 2020 DES7035 ISBN: 978-1-78252-501-1 © the Royal Society
    Digital technology and the planet Harnessing computing to achieve net zero Digital technology and the planet: Harnessing computing to achieve net zero Issued: December 2020 DES7035 ISBN: 978-1-78252-501-1 © The Royal Society The text of this work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. Erratum: The first edition of this report incorrectly stated there were no data centres The license is available at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 from Google, Amazon or Microsoft in the UK, while there are at least two from Microsoft. Images are not covered by this license. This error has been corrected on p74. The first edition also stated that ‘If individuals This report and other project outputs can be keep their phones for four years instead of viewed at: royalsociety.org/topics-policy/ two, this contribution is halved’, which was projects/digital-technology-and-the-planet/ corrected on p75 to ‘Keeping phones for twice as long can significantly reduce this share of emissions’. The conclusions of this report Cover image © NicoElNino. remain unchanged. CONTENTS Contents Foreword 5 Executive summary 6 Recommendations 8 Introduction 15 Chapter one – Transforming the future 23 The potential of digital technology to support a low-carbon economy 24 A future digitally-enabled net zero economy and society 25 Digital technologies for the planet 33 Creating policy frameworks to support the use of digital technologies for net zero 38 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Monday 19 November 2012
    Monday 13 May 2013 Members present: Andrew Miller, in the Chair David Morris Graham Stringer Stephen Mosley Roger Williams 1. Educating tomorrow’s engineers: the impact of Government reforms on 14–19 education: Government Response to the Committee's Seventh Report of Session 2012–13 Draft Special Report (Educating tomorrow’s engineers: the impact of Government reforms on 14–19 education: Government Response to the Committee's Seventh Report of Session 2012– 13), proposed by the Chair, brought up, read the first and second time, and agreed to. The Government’s response to the Seventh Report of Session 2012-13 was appended to the Report. Resolved, That the Report be the First Special Report of the Committee to the House. Ordered, That the Chair make the Report to the House. 2. Work of the European and UK Space Agencies The Committee considered this matter. Ordered, That the following written evidence relating to the work of the European and UK space agencies be reported to the House for publication on the internet: Dr Kevin Madders (ESA 21); UK Space Agency (ESA 22); Met Office (ESA 23). 3. Climate change: public understanding and policy implications Ordered, That the following written evidence relating to Climate change: public understanding and policy implications be reported to the House for publication on the internet: Bob Ward (Climate 41); Understanding Risk Research Group, Cardiff University (Climate 42); Sir Christopher Audland (Climate 43); UCL Communicating Climate Science Policy Commission (Climate 44); Green Alliance (Climate 45); University of Salford (Climate 46); Department of Energy and Climate Change (Climate 47); John D Taylor (Climate 48); Committee on Climate Change (Climate 49); Met Office (Climate 50).
    [Show full text]
  • The History Group's Silver Jubilee
    History of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography Special Interest Group Newsletter 3, 2009 A VIEW FROM THE CHAIR CONTENTS In the February 2004 issue of Physics World A view from the Chair................................ 1 (pp.14-15), Werner Marx and Manuel Cardona (of the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Concern over climate change! .................. 2 Research, Stuttgart) asked why scientists Jehuda Neumann Prize 2009.................... 3 were so obsessed with recent publications, New Occasional Paper.............................. 3 often at the expense of older work. A forgotten journal..................................... 4 They suggested a possible explanation was that Storm warnings for seafarers .................... 6 the number of papers published every year in The D-Day Forecast................................ 10 the natural sciences had increased by a factor A century ago .......................................... 12 of between two and four since 1974. Thus, there Annual General Meetings........................ 13 were many more new papers to read now and The Great Depression of the 1930s ........ 14 there was even less time than before to re-read Membership card, 1855-1856 ................. 16 older papers. The Web, they pointed out, had Pictures from the past ............................. 17 also increased the pace of the publishing process and the volume of material published. It Icing, but not on the cake! ....................... 18 was obviously important, they agreed, to stay up Recent publications................................. 19 to date with the latest research, but not at the Dates for your diary................................. 20 expense of all the papers that had gone before. Sir Napier Shaw’s Christmas Card.......... 22 They began their article with a question: How Historic photograph ................................. 23 can the significance or usefulness of a scientific 2009 members of the Group ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Climate: Observations, Projections and Impacts
    Developed at the request of: Climate: Observations, projections and impacts Research conducted by: Australia We have reached a critical year in our response to There is already strong scientific evidence that the climate change. The decisions that we made in climate has changed and will continue to change Cancún put the UNFCCC process back on track, saw in future in response to human activities. Across the us agree to limit temperature rise to 2 °C and set us in world, this is already being felt as changes to the the right direction for reaching a climate change deal local weather that people experience every day. to achieve this. However, we still have considerable work to do and I believe that key economies and Our ability to provide useful information to help major emitters have a leadership role in ensuring everyone understand how their environment has a successful outcome in Durban and beyond. changed, and plan for future, is improving all the time. But there is still a long way to go. These To help us articulate a meaningful response to climate reports – led by the Met Office Hadley Centre in change, I believe that it is important to have a robust collaboration with many institutes and scientists scientific assessment of the likely impacts on individual around the world – aim to provide useful, up to date countries across the globe. This report demonstrates and impartial information, based on the best climate that the risks of a changing climate are wide-ranging science now available. This new scientific material and that no country will be left untouched by climate will also contribute to the next assessment from the change.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Advisory Task Force Final Report
    Final Version WATF Final Report 17 February 2021 Network Rail Weather Advisory Task Force Final Report February 2021 Prepared by: Prof. Dame Julia Slingo FRS Paul Davies FRMetS (Met Office) Prof. Hayley Fowler (Newcastle University) 1 Final Version WATF Final Report 17 February 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 2. Context of the challenges facing Network Rail and its weather risk management ..................... 10 3. Emerging signal of climate change ........................................................................................... 12 4. Current procurement and application of weather data and services ......................................... 16 5. Current advances in understanding the characteristics of the UK’s rainfall ............................... 22 5.1 Observing and Measuring Rainfall .......................................................................................... 22 5.2 New rainfall climatologies ...................................................................................................... 25 6. Current advances in forecasting the weather from hours to weeks .......................................... 26 6.1 Risk-based forecasting on all timescales using ensembles of forecasts .................................... 28 6.2 High resolution,
    [Show full text]
  • Research Europe, 9 February 2017
    Updated daily at www.ResearchProfessional.com 9 February 2017 EU strategic investment fund under fire for few results – p4,5 Brexit Where to now? – p7-8, 13 Innovation Output-based payment trial to cut Horizon 2020 audit burden – p5 Science advice panel struggles to find feet Scientific Advice Mechanism’s second loss is chairman The chairman of The high-level group at the by Eleni Courea [email protected] Commission’s Scientific Advice Mechanism has become the second of seven members to quit within from a consortium called Science Advice for Policy by two months—raising questions about the SAM’s likely European Academies (Sapea), which was only formed effectiveness. last month. It has five members: Academia Europaea, Henrik Wegener, a food scientist, is leaving the SAM the European Academies Science Advisory Council, All to become rector of the University of Copenhagen. In European Academies, EURO-Case, and the Federation December, meteorologist Julia Slingo also left when of European Academies of Medicine. she retired from her full-time job at the UK Met Office. “The first year was to some extent a proof-of-con- Chairing the high-level group will pass to Rolf-Dieter cept year,” Wegener says. “As that comes to an end Heuer, former director of Cern. The deputy chairwoman we enter the more important second phase, where will be Pearl Dykstra, a sociologist at Erasmus University, the academies and societies become part of the Rotterdam; and Paul Nurse, director of the Francis Crick mechanism. So the full potential of the mechanism Institute in London, joins the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Feamle Fellows 2015
    Female Fellows of the Royal Society Fellowship Professor Jan M Anderson FRS [1996] Dame Julia Higgins DBE FREng FRS [1995] Professor Judith Armitage FRS [2013] Professor Brigid Hogan FRS [2001] Professor Frances Ashcroft FMedSci FRS [1999] Professor Christine Holt FMedSci FRS [2009] Professor Gillian Bates FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Judith Howard CBE FRS [2002] Professor Jean Beggs CBE FRS [1998] Professor Patricia Jacobs OBE FMedSci FRS [1993] Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell DBE FRS [2003] Professor Lisa Jardine CBE FRS [2015]* Dame Valerie Beral DBE FMedSci FRS [2006] Dame Carole Jordan DBE FRS [1990] Dr Mariann Bienz FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Victoria Kaspi FRS [2010] Professor Dorothy Bishop FBA FMedSci FRS [2014] Dr Olga Kennard OBE FRS [1987] Professor Elizabeth Blackburn AC FRS [1992] Professor Frances Kirwan DBE FRS [2001] Professor Andrea Brand FMedSci FRS [2010] Professor Jane Langdale FRS [2015] Professor Eleanor Burbidge FRS [1964] Professor Ottoline Leyser CBE FRS [2007] Professor Eleanor Campbell FRS [2010] Professor Ruth Lynden-Bell FRS [2006] Professor Doreen Cantrell CBE FMedSci FRS [2011] Professor Georgina Mace CBE FRS [2002] Professor Deborah Charlesworth FRS [2005] Professor Trudy Mackay FRS [2006] Professor Jennifer Clack FRS [2009] Professor Enid MacRobbie FRS [1991] Professor Jane Clarke FMedSci FRS [2015] Dr Philippa Marrack FMedSci FRS [1997] Professor Nicola Clayton FRS [2010] Professor Dusa McDuff FRS [1994] Professor Suzanne Cory AC FRS [1992] Professor Angela McLean FRS [2009] Professor Anne Cutler FRS [2015]
    [Show full text]