DOCSLIB.ORG

Natura Impact Statement for the Development of a 1:15 Scale Test Site for Wave Energy Devices at Belmullet Co. Mayo Produced By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natura Impact Statement for the Development of a 1:15 Scale Test Site for Wave Energy Devices at Belmullet Co. Mayo Produced By Natura Impact Statement for the Development of a 1:15 Scale Test Site for Wave Energy Devices at Belmullet Co. Mayo Produced by AQUAFACT International Services Ltd. On behalf of M-WEST December 2014 AQUAFACT INTERNATIONAL SERVICES ltd. 12 KILKERRIN PARK, GALWAY www.aquafact.ie [email protected] tel +353 (0) 91 756812 fax +353 (0) 91 756888 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Requirement for an Article 6 Assessment ................................................................................ 1 1.2. The Aim of this Report .............................................................................................................. 1 2. Appropriate Assessment Process 2 2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. Stages ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2.1. Stage 1. Screening for Appropriate Assessment .................................................................................... 4 2.2.2. Stage 2. Appropriate Assessment........................................................................................................... 5 2.2.3. Stage 3. Alternative Solutions ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2.4. Stage 4. Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest (IROPI)/Derogation .................................... 5 3. Description of the Project 6 3.1. Description of the Proposal ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.2. Investigation/development phase .......................................................................................................... 8 3.1.3. Operational phase .................................................................................................................................. 8 3.2. Description of the Receiving Environment ............................................................................. 10 3.3. Likely Effects of the Proposal .................................................................................................. 14 4. Appropriate Assessment Screening 14 4.1. Identification of Relevant Natura 2000 Sites .......................................................................... 14 4.2. Screening Assessment ............................................................................................................ 14 5. Stage 2 Appropriate Assessment (Natura Impact Statement) 21 5.1. Assessment of the Likely Effects ............................................................................................. 21 5.1.1. Likely Effects of the Proposal ................................................................................................................ 21 5.1.2. Impact Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 21 5.1.3. Cumulative Effects ................................................................................................................................ 27 5.2. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 30 6. Marine Mammal Risk Assessment 30 6.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 30 6.1.1. Sound source ........................................................................................................................................ 30 6.1.2. Species .................................................................................................................................................. 31 6.1.3. Environment ......................................................................................................................................... 32 6.2. Risk Identification ................................................................................................................... 33 6.3. Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 35 7. References 35 List of Figures Figure 2.1: Stages in the AA process (Source: DEHLG, 2009). ........................................................................... 4 Figure 3.1: Location of the proposed test site. ................................................................................................ 7 Figure 3.2: Location of the Annexed habitats and species sites in relation to the proposed test site. ............13 Figure 4.1: cSACs within 15km of the proposed test site ................................................................................16 Figure 4.2: SPAs within 15km of the proposed test site .................................................................................17 Figure 5.1: Aquaculture activity in Blacksod Bay. ...........................................................................................29 List of Tables Table 3.1: Coordinates of the proposed test site. ............................................................................................ 7 Table 4.1: Natura 2000 sites, Qualifying Interests, Potential Impacts and Screening Assessment. * denotes priority habitats. ...................................................................................................................................17 Table 5.1: Impacts and activities within the Mullet/Blacksod Bay cSAC (IE000470) (NPWS, 1999) .................27 Table 6.1: Criteria for Permanent injury – estimated values for PTS onset for non pulse sources ..................34 Table 6.2: Criteria and values for disturbance/behavioural response from non pulse sources .......................34 List of Appendices Appendix 1 NPWS Consultation Appendix 2 Baseline Characterisation Survey of Test Site Wave Energy Test Site 1:15 Scale, M-WEST Belmullet, Co. Mayo December 2014 1. Introduction 1.1. Requirement for an Article 6 Assessment The proposed 1:15 scale wave energy test site is located within the Mullet/Blacksod Bay Complex cSAC (Site Code: IE000470) and the Blacksod Bay / Broadhaven SPA (IE004037). Therefore, it is regarded as necessary that this proposal have due regard to Article 6 (3) of the EU Habitats Directive1 which states: Article 6 (3): Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the [Natura 2000] site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the [Natura 2000] site in view of the [Natura 2000] site’s conservation objectives. This is transposed into national legislation by Regulation 31 of the European Communities (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1997. 1.2. The Aim of this Report This document has been prepared in accordance with current guidance (DEHLG, 2009, Revised February 2010; EPA Advice Notes on Current Practice (CAAS, 2003); EPA ‘Guidelines on the Information to be contained in Environmental Impact Statements’ (CAAS, 2002); and the Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment (IEEM, 2006) and provides an assessment of the ecological impacts of the proposed development. The document provides the information required in order to establish whether or not the proposed test site is likely to have a significant impact on surrounding Natura 2000 sites in the context of their conservation objectives and specifically on the habitats and species for which the site has been designated. 1 Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora to beneficial consequences of primary importance for the environment or, further to an opinion from the Commission, to other imperative reasons of overriding public interest. 1 JN1254 Wave Energy Test Site 1:15 Scale, M-WEST Belmullet, Co. Mayo December 2014 2. Appropriate Assessment Process 2.1. Introduction There is a requirement, under Article 6(3) of the EU Habitats Directive (Directive 92/43/EEC), to carry out an Appropriate Assessment. The first step of the Appropriate Assessment process is to establish whether, in relation to a particular plan or project, Appropriate Assessment is required. Article 6(3) states: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives. In the light of the conclusions of the assessment of the implications for the site and subject to the provisions of paragraph 4, the competent national authorities shall agree to the plan or project only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate, after having obtained the opinion of the general public.’ If the Appropriate Assessment determines that a plan or project may adversely affect the integrity of a Natura 2000 site, then Article 6 (4) may come into play. Article
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AA Natura Impact Report
    Natura Impact Report In support of the Habitats Directive Assessment Of the Draft Mayo County Development Plan 2014 – 2020 ______________________________________________________ In accordance with Article 6(3) and 6(4) of the Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna (Habitats Directive) Mayo County Council February 2013 Includes Ordnance Survey Ireland data reproduced under OSi Licence number 2013/17 CCMA / Mayo County Council. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland copyright. © Ordnance Survey Ireland, 2013. Table of Contents 1 Introduction . 1 1.1 Background . 1 1.2 Legislation and Biodiversity Impact Assessment. 1 1.3 Habitats Directive Assessment. .2 2 Natura 2000 Network and the draft Mayo County Development Plan 2014 - 2020 . 6 2.1 Background data on Natura 2000 sites . 6 2.2 Conservation objectives and conservation status of Natura 2000 sites . 10 2.3 Description of draft Mayo County Development Plan 2014 – 2020 – alone and in-combination. 11 2.4 Consultation . 15 3 Screening . 16 3.1 Introduction. 16 3.2 Current threats to site integrity. 16 3.3 Potential significant effects on Natura 2000 sites as a consequence of the draft Plan . 43 3.4 Settlements of Mayo and Natura 2000 sites. 44 3.5 Evaluation of draft Plan policies and objectives . 45 3.6 Screening Conclusion . 87 4 Appropriate Assessment . 89 4.1 Introduction . 89 4.2 Aspects of the draft Plan likely to have significant effects on Natura 2000 sites. 90 4.3 Appropriate Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Landscape Names
    Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell E&P Ireland
    Shell E&P Ireland Ltd Offshore Supplementary Update Report 3 CONSTRUCTION 3.1 Construction Methods and Sequence The Construction Strategy for the offshore field and pipeline is described in the 2001 Offshore EIS. Some construction activities have taken place since 2001, including the installation of the export pipeline from the Corrib Field to the landfall at Glengad, however there are still a number of outstanding activities to be completed. Installation of the pipeline commenced in 2008 using methods described in the 2001 Offshore EIS. Further details of installation methods for a number of components yet to be installed are now available and are described below, along with an updated schedule. 3.2 Construction Sequence Activities carried out since 2001 on the offshore pipeline route, including the landfall, include the following: • 2002: Glengad Headland landfall site: Most of the topsoil stripping (approximately 80%) undertaken, to a distance of 50m landward of the cliff. A section of the cliff was cut to access the beach and intertidal zone. Following suspension of construction work, the landfall site and the cliff were reinstated. Nearshore and intertidal trench Broadhaven Bay: Intertidal causeway was constructed. Part of the trench was excavated and subsequently reinstated using the extracted rock and sand. Causeway was removed. • 2005: Glengad Headland: Temporary construction site established. Following suspension of works the area was reinstated. Nearshore Trench: The outer reinstated section of the near-shore trench was excavated and later backfilled. • 2006 – 2008: Corrib Field: Wells completed and Christmas trees installed, new wells drilled, well protection structures and infield flowlines installed, pipeline manifold protection structure installed.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment Screening
    Natura Impact Statement Appropriate Assessment Site Investigations at the Atlantic Marine Energy Test Site (AMETS) MERC Consultants Ltd, Loughaunbeg, Inverin, Co. Galway. www.mercenvronmental.ie 0 Client name Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland Address Wilton Park House, Wilton Place, Dublin 2 Document control Rev Revision Date Details Name 0.1 20.9.2019 Preliminary draft Louise Scally (L.S) 0.2 23.9.2019 Assessment of birds Jackie Hunt (J.H) 0.3 24.9.2019 Assessment of marine mammals Simon Berrow (S.B) 0.4 24.9.2019 Draft issued to client L.S. 0.4.2 8.10.2019 Minor edits L.S 0.5 14/11/2019 Inclusion of ecological sampling L.S 0.6 9/12/2019 Inclusion of multi beam and side scan sonar L.S 0.7 24/06/2020 Inclusion of mitigation/preparation of NIS L.S 0.8 25/06/2020 Review of proposed mitigation S.B. 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Louise Scally ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Simon Berrow .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Jackie Hunt ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    CORRIB DEVELOPMENT BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2014-2019 Front Cover Images: Sruwaddacon Bay Evening Lady’s Bedstraw at Glengad Green-veined White Butterfly near Leenamore Common Dolphin Vegetation survey at Glengad CORRIB DEVELOPMENT BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 1 Leenamore Inlet CORRIB DEVELOPMENT 2 BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN LIST OF CONTENTS 2.4 DATABASE OF BIODIVERSITY 39 3 THE BIODIVERSITY A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 ACTION PLAN 41 FOREWORd 5 3.1 ESTABLISHING PRIORITIES FOR CONSERVATION 41 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 3.1.1 HABITATS 41 1 INTRODUCTION 8 3.1.2 SPECIES 41 1.1 BIODIVERSITY 8 3.2 AIMS 41 1.1.1 WHAT is biodiversity? 8 3.3 OBJECTIVES AND acTIONS 42 1.1.2 WHY is biodiversity important? 8 3.4 MONITORING, EVALUATION 1.2 INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL CONTEXT 9 AND IMPROVEMENT 42 1.2.1 CONVENTION on BIODIVERSITY 9 3.4.1 MONITORING 42 1.2.2 NATIONAL and local implementation 9 3.4.2 EVALUATION and improvement 43 1.2.3 WHY A biodiversity action plan? 10 TABLE 5 SUMMARY of obJECTIVES and actions for THE conservation of habitats and species 43 3.4.3 Reporting, commUNICATING and 2 THE CORRIB DEVELOPMENT VERIFICATION 44 AND BIODIVERSITY 11 3.4.3.1 ACTIONS 44 2.1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE CORRIB 3.4.3.2 COMMUNICATION 44 DEVELOPMENT 11 3.5 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND FIG 1 LOCATION map 11 PARTNERSHIPS FOR BIODIVERSITY 44 FIG 2 Schematic CORRIB DEVELOPMENT 12 3.5.1 S TAKEHOLDER engagement and CONSULTATION 44 2.2 DESIGNATED CONSERVATION SITES AND THE CORRIB GaS DEVELOPMENT 13 3.5.2 PARTNERSHIPS for biodiversity 44 3.5.3 COMMUNITY staKEHOLDER engagement 45 2.2.1 DESIGNATED
    [Show full text]
  • Placenames and Road Signs Logainmneacha Agus Comhartha Bóthair
    Placenames and Road Signs Logainmneacha agus Comhartha Bóthair Irish English as Gaeilge as Béarla Achaidh Céide Céide Fields An Chorrchloch Corclogh / Corclough An Clochar Clogher An Cloigeann Claggan (Ballycroy) An Fál Mor Falmore An Fód Dubh Blacksod An Geata Mór Binghamstown An Muirthead Mullet Peninsula An tInbhear Inver An tSraith Shraigh / Srah Baile an Chaisil Ballycastle Baile Chruaich Ballycroy Baile Glas Ballyglass Baingear Bangor Barr na Binne Buí Benwee Head Barr na Trá Barnatra Bay Bá / Cuan Béal an Átha Ballina Béal an Mhuirthead Belmullet Béal Átha Chomhraic Bellacorick Béal Deirg Belderg / Belderrig Placenames and Road Signs Logainmneacha agus Comhartha Bóthair Irish English as Gaeilge as Béarla Cairn Carne Caisleán an Bharraigh Castlebar Ceann an Eanaigh Annagh Head Ceann Dhún Pádraig Downpatrick Head Ceann Iorrais Erris Head Ceann Ramhar Doohoma Head Ceathrú Thaidhg Carrowteige Cross An Chrois Cuan an Fhóid Dubh Blacksod Bay Cuan an Inbhear Broadhaven Bay Dubh Oileáin Duvillaun Dubh Thuama / Dú Thuama Doohoma Dumha Locha Doolough Dún na mBó Doonamo Eachléim Aughleam / Aghleam Gailf Chúrsa Chairn Carne Golf Links Gaoth Sáile Geesala / Gweesalia Gleann Chaisil Glencastle Gleann Chuillin Glencullen Gleann na Muaidhe Glenamoy Inis Bigil Inishbiggle Placenames and Road Signs Logainmneacha agus Comhartha Bóthair Irish English as Gaeilge as Béarla Inis Gé Inishkea Inis Gé Theas Iniskea South Inis Gé Thuaidh Iniskea North Inis Gluaire Inishglora Iorras / Iorrais Erris Loch na Ceathrú Móire Carrowmore Lake Loch na Croise Cross Lake Mullach Rua Mullaghroe Oileán Chloigeann Claggan Island Oileán lolra / Oileán sa Tuaidh Eagle Island Poll a’ tSómais Pollathomas / Pullathomas Port a’ Chlóidh / Port an Chlóidh Portacloy Port Durlainne Porturlin Ráith Roy Ros Dumhach Rossport Trá Beach Trá Oiligh Elly Beach / Bay Tullaghan Bay Bá Thualachan Go Mall Slow (Down) Placenames and Road Signs Logainmneacha agus Comhartha Bóthair Irish English as Gaeilge as Béarla Críoch End Aire Caution / Take Care Aire Leanaí Children – Take Care .
    [Show full text]
  • The Corrib Debacle
    1. THE CORRIB DEBACLE – WHY IRELAND IS COMPLETELY OFF LIMITS FOR INVESTMENT 1.1 The background to the debacle Natural gas generates over 60% of the electricity in Ireland and fuels homes and industry. While the Kinsale Field was discovered and developed in the early seventies, gas from the European network is currently pumped into the reservoir there over the summer and drawn out over the winter months. Very little is drawn any more from the field itself. Indeed a single gas pipeline from the European grid goes to a compressor station in South Western Scotland and then is routed under the Irish Sea to North of Dublin. The country is hanging off that pipe! Ireland has not had a good innings with petroleum exploration. About 150 exploration wells have been drilled in the Irish Sector, outside of Kinsale Field we had to wait until 1996 until Enterprise Energy Ireland finally hit pay dirt with the Corrib Natural Gas Field. Note: Shell Exploration and Production Ireland Ltd (SEPIL) acquired Enterprise Energy Ireland in 2002. A pretty poor run from exploration in Irish waters, in particular given that a drilling rig costs about €0.6 million per day and the success ratio in the North Sea sector is about one producing field for every four exploration wells drilled. 1 Bit of a difference in petroleum finds in North Sea and Irish waters. However, many Irish are insistent that the same exploration terms should apply in both jurisdictions. The Corrib field is marginal by international standards; the well head is 80 km off the exposed North Western Coast and at a depth of 300 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Mulranny Tourism Eden Brochure
    Ballycastle 5 A MULRANNY TOURISM INITIATIVE TOURISM MULRANNY A 1 R314 Belmullet Excellence of Destination European A R314 N59 R313 R313 R315 Bangor Bellacorick N59 Crossmolina R294 364 Ballina Maumykelly N59 R iv e r R312 M Slieve Carr o y Blacksod Bay 721 600 N26 500 6 400 300 R315 200 B 100 a n W Ballycroy g o e r 627 s t T e Visitor Centre r r a Nephin Beg n Bunaveela i Slievemore l W Lough 311 a 672 y Nephin 806 Lough NATIONAL 700 Conn E 600 Achill Island Glennamong 500 400 688 Lough Keel PARK G 300 Bunacurry INISHBIGGLE 628 200 Acorrymore Lough N Croaghaun ANNAGH 100 ISLAND A 698 R319 Keel R Birreencorragh R312 G W Pontoon 4 714 100 E e Foxford 300 s Lough 200 400 500 600 B ACHILL t e Cullin SOUND r N26 466 G N n I 588 r Lough W R319 e N59 H a Feeagh P a t E y R319 N Buckoogh N58 W / 452 1 e Claggan Mountain B s Knockletragh t a e n r n g Beltra Mulranny o G Lough r European Destination of Excellence r T e r e a n i w l Ballycroy National Park Céide Fields a y R310 Furnace Lough 524 500 Dublin 400 R317 Corraun Hill 300 R312 St Brendens Rockfleet Burrishoole N5 200 Well Castle Abbey Newport Kildownet 100 3 Castle Church W R311 Achillbeg y a e Island s w t n e e r e n r W G Castlebar a n r y e t s R311 e W N59 MAYO t a Clew Bay e r N60 G 1 N5 GREENWAY WESTERN GREAT N84 Clare Island Westport ˜ Jutting proudly into the Atlantic Ocean, Mayo has a stunningly beautiful, unspoilt 7 R330 CO MAYO MAYO CO environment - a magical destination for visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Atlantic Way Mayo Discovery Points Mayo Discovery Points
    WILD ATLANTIC WAY MAYO DISCOVERY POINTS MAYO DISCOVERY POINTS DISCOVERY POINT DISTANCE JOURNEY TIME 5 4 1 BALLINA QUAY 49.3 km 50 mins 6 2 3 KILLALA QUAY 51 km 50 mins 7 3 LACKAN STRAND 58.8 km 1 hr 4 DOWNPATRICK HEAD - Signature Point 62.8 km 1 hr 5 mins 2 5 8 11 CEIDE FIELDS 64 km 1 hr 5 mins 1 6 9 DÚN NA MBÓ (DOONAMO) 77 km 1 hr 10 mins 10 7 ANNAGH HEAD (CEANN AN EANAIGH) 78 km 1 hr 10 mins 15 12 8 TRÁ OILÍ (ELLY BEACH) 80.5 km 1 hr 10 mins 9 13 AN FÁL MÓR (FALMORE) 90 km 1 hr 20 mins 16 17 14 10 AN FÓD DUBH (BLACKSOD HARBOUR) 89.1 km 1 hr 20 mins 18 11 OILEÁN CHLOIGEANN (CLAGGAN ISLAND) 66 km 1 hr 21 YOU ARE HERE 12 CEANN RAMHAR (DOOHOMA HEAD) 69 km 1 hr 5 mins 19 20 13 INIS BIGIL (INISHBIGGLE ISLAND) 35.1 km 35 mins 23 22 25 24 14 CLAGGAN MOUNTAIN COASTAL TRAIL 23.7 km 25 mins 15 26 TRÁ DHUMHA GOIRT (DUGORT BEACH) 45 km 45 mins 27 16 KEEM BAY - Signature Point 53.7 km 1 hr 29 17 28 KEEL STRAND 45.5 km 45 mins 18 30 CUAN NA HAISLÉIME (ASHLEAM BAY) 38.4 km 40 mins 19 AN CHÉIBH BHEAG (CLOGHMORE PIER) 39.5 km 40 mins 31 20 SPANISH ARMADA VIEWPOINT 25.4 km 25 mins 21 DUMHACH BHEAG 19.4 km 20 mins 22 CROAGH PATRICK VIEW 21 km 25 mins 23 OLD HEAD 30.6 km 35 mins 24 ROONAGH PIER 40 km 45mins 25 CLARE ISLAND 26 INISHTURK 27 CARROWNISKY STRAND 42 km 45 mins 28 SILVER STRAND 47.2 km 55 mins 29 DOOLOUGH VALLEY 45.9 km 50 mins 30 AASLEAGH FALLS 41.1 km 45 mins 31 KILLARY HARBOUR - Signature Point 46.5 km 50 min 1.
    [Show full text]
  • E Corrib Gas Project: the Deposition of 450,000 Tonnes of Peat
    PEAT IN ENERGY e Corrib gas project: the deposition of 450,000 tonnes of peat B. Moyles Bord na Móna Energy Ltd, Leabeg, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Ireland Phone: +353-87-9612077, e-mail: [email protected] Summary As part of Shell’s Corrib gas project to construct an onshore gas terminal at Bellanaboy, North-west Mayo, Ireland it was necessary to remove approximately 450,000 m³ of peat from the terminal footprint. The excavation works were carried out by a civil engineering contractor (Roadbridge Ltd.) and this excavated peat was then transported by a road haulier (Iggy Madden Transport Ltd.) a distance of 11km by road to a specially constructed deposition site owned and operated by Bord na Móna. This peat deposition site, where the removed peat was received, re-loaded for internal site haulage and finally placed, is located on industrial cutaway peatlands in Srahmore, near Bangor-Erris in Co. Mayo, Ireland. The peat deposition process was included as part of the planning application for Shell E&P Ireland Ltd (SEPIL) to construct a gas terminal for the reception and separation of gas from the Corrib gas field. The deposition was governed by numerous planning conditions, also separate conditions imposed as part of the waste licence as issued by the EPA. The peat was received at Srahmore and spread over low areas (bays) to depths of on average 1.4m - 1.8m. The deposited peat was then profiled allowing for water run off. Following deposition activities and the im - plementation of the agreed monitoring programme vegetation was allowed to establish naturally, primarily soft rush ( Juncus effusus ) as well as other native peatland species.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacksod Bay Broad Haven
    Blacksod Bay/Broad Haven Special Protection Area (Site Code 4037) ≡ Conservation Objectives Supporting Document VERSION 1 National Parks & Wildlife Service November 2014 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S SUMMARY PART ONE - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 1 1.1 Introductiion to the desiignatiion of Speciiall Protectiion Areas ........................................... 1 1.2 Introductiion to Bllacksod Bay /Broad Haven Speciiall Protectiion Area ............................. 2 1.3 Introductiion to Conservatiion Objjectiives ....................................................................... 3 PART TWO – SITE DESIGNATION INFORMATION .................................................................... 5 2.1 Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of Bllacksod Bay/ Broad Haven Speciiall Protectiion Area 5 PART THREE - CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES FOR BLACKSOD BAY/BROAD HAVEN SPA ... 8 3.1 Conservatiion Objjectiives for the non-breediing Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of Bllacksod Bay/Broad Haven SPA ........................................................................................ 8 PART FOUR – REVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF WATERBIRD INTEREST FEATURES ................................................................... 12 4.1 Popullatiion data for non-breediing waterbiird SCI speciies of Bllacksod Bay/Broad Haven SPA 12 4.2 Waterbiird popullatiion trends at Bllacksod Bay / Broad Haven SPA............................... 13 4.3 Bllacksod Bay /Broad Haven SPA – siite conservatiion status
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Corrib Gas Controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ Analyses of a Resource Conflict
    Assessing the Corrib gas controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ analyses of a resource conflict Slevin, A. (2019). Assessing the Corrib gas controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ analyses of a resource conflict. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(2), 519-530. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.exis.2018.11.004 Published in: The Extractive Industries and Society Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2018 The Authors. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/,which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:26. Sep. 2021 Assessing the Corrib gas controversy: Beyond ‘David and Goliath’ analyses of a resource conflict Abstract Since its discovery offshore Ireland in 1996, Corrib gas has become synonymous with controversy and social- ecological upheaval.
    [Show full text]