DOCSLIB.ORG

Marc Chagall Was Born in 1887 to a Poor Jewish Family in Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marc Chagall Was Born in 1887 to a Poor Jewish Family in Russia Marc Chagall was born in 1887 to a poor Jewish family in Russia. He was the eldest of nine children. Chagall began to display his artistic talent while studying at a secular Russian school, and despite his father’s disapproval, in 1907 he began studying art with Leon Bakst in St. Petersburg. It was at this time that his distinct style that we recognize today began to emerge. As his paintings began to center on images from his childhood, the focus that would guide his artistic motivation for the rest of his life came to fruition. In 1910, Chagall, moved to Paris for four years. It was during this period that he painted some of his most famous paintings of the Jewish village, and developed the features that became recognizable trademarks of his art. Strong and bright colors began to portray the world in a dreamlike state. Fantasy, nostalgia, and religion began to fuse together to create otherworldly images. In 1914, before the outbreak of World War I, Chagall held a one-man show in Berlin, exhibiting work dominated by Jewish images. During the war, he resided in Russia, and in 1917, endorsing the revolution, he was appointed Commissar for Fine Arts in Vitebsk and then director of the newly established Free Academy of Art. In 1922, Chagall left Russia, settling in France one year later. He lived there permanently except for the years 1941 - 1948 when, fleeing France during World War II, he resided in the United States. Chagall's horror over the Nazi rise to power is expressed in works depicting Jewish martyrs and refugees. In addition to images of the Jewish world, Chagall's paintings are inspired by themes from the Bible. His fascination with the Bible culminated in a series of over 100 etchings illustrating the Bible, many of which incorporate elements from folklore and from religious life in Russia. Israel, which Chagall first visited in 1931 for the opening of the Tel Aviv Art Museum, is likewise endowed with some of Chagall's work, most notably the twelve stained glass windows at Hadassah Hospital and wall decorations at the Knesset. Chagall received many prizes and much recognition for his work. He was also one of very few artists to exhibit work at the Louvre in their lifetime. Marc Chagall 1887–1985 Biography Paris Through the Window (Paris par la fenêtre), 1913. Oil on canvas, 53 1/2 x 55 3/4 inches (135.8 x 141.4 cm). Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, Solomon R. Guggenheim Founding Collection, By gift 37.438. © 2009 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris After Marc Chagall moved to Paris from Russia in 1910, his paintings quickly came to reflect the latest avant-garde styles. In Paris Through the Window, Chagall’s debt to the Orphic Cubism of his colleague Robert Delaunay is clear in the semitransparent overlapping planes of vivid color in the sky above the city. The Eiffel Tower, which appears in the cityscape, was also a frequent subject in Delaunay’s work. For both artists it served as a metaphor for Paris and perhaps modernity itself. Chagall’s parachutist might also refer to contemporary experience, since the first successful jump occurred in 1912. Other motifs suggest the artist’s native Vitebsk. This painting is an enlarged version of a window view in a self-portrait painted one year earlier, in which the artist contrasted his birthplace with Paris. The Janus figure in Paris Through the Window has been read as the artist looking at once westward to his new home in France and eastward to Russia. Chagall, however, refused literal interpretations of his paintings, and it is perhaps best to think of them as lyrical evocations, similar to the allusive plastic poetry of the artist’s friends Blaise Cendrars (who named this canvas) and Guillaume Apollinaire. Years after Chagall painted The Soldier Drinks he stated that it developed from his memory of tsarist soldiers who were billeted with families during the 1904–05 Russo- Japanese war. The enlisted man in the picture, with his right thumb pointing out the window and his left index finger pointing to the cup, is similar to the two-faced man in Paris Through the Window in that both figuratively mediate between dual worlds— interior versus exterior space, past and present, the imaginary and the real. In paintings such as these it is clear that the artist preferred the life of the mind, memory, and magical Symbolism over realistic representation. In Green Violinist Chagall evoked his homeland. The artist’s nostalgia for his own work was another impetus in creating this painting, which is based on earlier versions of the same subject. His cultural and religious legacy is illuminated by the figure of the violinist dancing in a rustic village. The Chabad Hasidim of Chagall’s childhood believed it possible to achieve communion with God through music and dance, and the fiddler was a vital presence in ceremonies and festivals “Paris through the window” MARC CHAGALL 1913 oil on canvas, 135.8- 141.4 cm. - New York, Guggenheim Museum (www.guggenheim.org) Raised in a poor Jewish family in Russia, Marc Chagall moved to Paris in 1923, where he felt like a stranger, a foreigner “impressed by the light”, in his own words. Despite having exhibited at the “Salon des Independents” with the main artists of his era, Chagall always stayed faithful to his peculiar style, a style, according to his own words, “poetic without poetry, mystic without mysticism”. Perhaps due to this obstinacy, during his last years his oeuvre is quite irregular, but in his first years in Paris he painted masterpieces full of mystery, just as the work illustrated here. With its shining colours, strange figures and unusual composition, this painting by Marc Chagall talks us about a mysterious and indecipherable Paris in which nothing -or nobody- is really what they appear to be. Art Review | 'Paris Through the Window: Marc Chagall and His Circle' His First Brush With the City of Light By KAREN ROSENBERG Published: June 23, 2011 If you were an Eastern European artist in early-20th-century Paris, you were part of a close, intensely competitive network. Montparnasse was full of ramshackle studio buildings like La Ruche, or the beehive, a honeycomblike structure where the Russian- Jewish painter Marc Chagall (1887-1985) struggled alongside Modigliani, Soutine and other expats. “In La Ruche, you died or came out famous,” Chagall is said to have remarked. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris “Half-Past Three (The Poet),” which depicts the Russian poet Mazin, was one of many works that Marc Chagall created shortly after he arrived in Paris as a young Russian artist in 1911. ‘Paris Through the Window’ “Paris Through the Window: Marc Chagall and His Circle,” at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, tries to recapture some of this proximal magic. The show sounds very much like a reprise of last year’s “Picasso and the Avant-Garde in Paris” — the crucial difference being that Chagall was no Picasso. Like the Picasso exhibition, “Paris Through the Window” builds on the Philadephia Museum’s substantial collection of early Modern art. It includes a taste of Chagall at his best, as well as a smattering of Modiglianis and Soutines and a generous serving of influential if less beloved artists like Jean Metzinger, Jacques Lipchitz and Albert Gleizes. But it feels uninspired, more like a festival obligation (it was planned in conjunction with the Philadelphia International Festival of the Arts) than like a flash of curatorial inspiration. And it does nothing to dispute the commonly held notion that Chagall remained a small- town artist at heart, the proverbial fiddler on the roof, even when he was rubbing shoulders with the Parisian avant-garde. The show, organized by the museum’s curator of Modern art, Michael Taylor, gets off to a promising start. Early paintings by Chagall and his Cubist associates show us that he had the potential to become a much more exciting artist. Under the influence of Metzinger and Robert Delaunay, among others, he introduced fractured forms to his enchanted scenes of city life. In Chagall’s “Self-Portrait With White Collar,” which hangs next to Metzinger’s marvelous “Tea Time (Woman With a Teaspoon,)” a faceted forehead and deep under- eye hollows amount to a tentative stab at Cubism. So does the prismatic sky of “Paris Through the Window,” though the painting’s mythic creatures (among them a parachutist, a Janus figure and a cat with a human face) overshadow its formal achievements. Here too is “Half-Past Three (The Poet)” (1911), a highlight of the museum’s collection and undoubtedly one of the best paintings Chagall ever made. It shows the Russian writer Mazin scribbling lines in a notebook and raising a coffee cup to his upside-down, green- tinged head. The painting’s broken diagonals hold Chagall’s sentimental tendencies in check, evoking the bleary-eyed sensations of the wee hours. That upended head — a reference to a Yiddish idiom for madness or delirium, “fardreiter kop” — reappears in the later work “Oh God” (1919). Chagall painted it as he was being pushed out of the art school he had founded in his hometown, Vitebsk. He had quarreled with El Lissitsky and Kazimir Malevich, whose Constructivist curriculum had proved more popular with the students. Chagall had been stuck in Russia since 1914, when he went home to visit family on the eve of World War I. In his small painting “The Smolensk Newspaper,” two seated men bearing a more than casual resemblance to Cézanne’s “Card Players” react to the news of war breaking out.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Abstract Artists and Their Appropriation of Prehistoric Rock Pictures in 1937
    “First Surrealists Were Cavemen”: The American Abstract Artists and Their Appropriation of Prehistoric Rock Pictures in 1937 Elke Seibert How electrifying it must be to discover a world of new, hitherto unseen pictures! Schol- ars and artists have described their awe at encountering the extraordinary paintings of Altamira and Lascaux in rich prose, instilling in us the desire to hunt for other such discoveries.1 But how does art affect art and how does one work of art influence another? In the following, I will argue for a causal relationship between the 1937 exhibition Prehis- toric Rock Pictures in Europe and Africa shown at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the new artistic directions evident in the work of certain New York artists immediately thereafter.2 The title for one review of this exhibition, “First Surrealists Were Cavemen,” expressed the unsettling, alien, mysterious, and provocative quality of these prehistoric paintings waiting to be discovered by American audiences (fig. ).1 3 The title moreover illustrates the extent to which American art criticism continued to misunderstand sur- realist artists and used the term surrealism in a pejorative manner. This essay traces how the group known as the American Abstract Artists (AAA) appropriated prehistoric paintings in the late 1930s. The term employed in the discourse on archaic artists and artistic concepts prior to 1937 was primitivism, a term due not least to John Graham’s System and Dialectics of Art as well as his influential essay “Primitive Art and Picasso,” both published in 1937.4 Within this discourse the art of the Ice Age was conspicuous not only on account of the previously unimagined timespan it traversed but also because of the magical discovery of incipient human creativity.
    [Show full text]
  • El Lissitzky, Made a Career of Utilizing Art for Social and Political Change
    "The space must be a kind of showcase, a stage, on which the pictures make their appearance as actors in a drama (or comedy). It should not imitate a living space." SYNOPSIS Russian avant-garde artist El Lissitzky, made a career of utilizing art for social and political change. Although often highly abstract and theoretical, Lissitzky's work was able speak to the prevailing political discourse of his native Russia, and then the nascent Soviet Union. Following Kazimir Malevich in the Suprematist idiom, Lissitzky used color and basic shapes to make strong political statements. Lissitzky also challenged conventions concerning art, and his Proun series of two-dimensional Suprematist paintings sought to combine architecture and three-dimensional space with traditional, albeit abstract, two- dimensional imagery. A teacher for much of his career and ever an innovator, Lissitzky's work spanned the media of graphic design, © The Art Story Foundation – All rights Reserved For more movements, artists and ideas on Modern Art visit www.TheArtStory.org typography, photography, photomontage, book design, and architectural design. The work of this cerebral artist was a force of change, deeply influencing movements and related figures such as De Stijl and the Bauhaus. KEY IDEAS Lissitzky believed that art and life could mesh and that the former could deeply affect the latter. He identified the graphic arts, particularly posters and books, and architecture as effective conduits for reaching the public. Consequently, his designs, whether for graphic productions or buildings, were often unfiltered political messages. Despite being comprised of rudimentary shapes and colors, a poster by Lissitzky could make a strong statement for political change and a building could evoke ideas of communality and egalitarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • The School of Paris Catalogue
    THE SCHOOL OF PARIS 12 MARCH - 28 APRIL 2016 Francis Bacon (1909 - 1992) Title: Woodrow Wilson, Paris, 1919, from Triptych (1986-1987) Medium: Original Etching and aquatint in colours, 1986/8, on wove paper, with full margins, signed by the artist in pencil Edition: 38/99 - There were also 15 Hors Commerce copies There were also 15 artists proofs in Roman numerals. Literature: Bruno Sabatier, "Francis Bacon: Oeuvre Graphique-Graphic Work. Catalogue Raisonné", JSC Modern Art Gallery, París 2012 Note: The present work is taken from an old press cutting of Woodrow Wilson in Paris for the Peace Conference of 1919. It was originally part of a triptych of works which included a study for the portraits of John Edwards and a Photograph of Totsky studio in Mexico in 1940. Woodrow Wilson (1856 - 1924) was the 28th President of the United States, elected President in 1912 and again in 1916. Published by: Editions Poligrafa, Barcelona, Spain Size: P. 25½ x 19¼ in (648 x 489 mm.) S. 35¼ x 24½ in. (895 x 622 mm.) George Braque (1882 - 1963) Title: Feuillage en couleurs Foliage in colours Medium: Etching in colours, circa 1956, on BFK Rives watermarked paper, signed by the artist in pencil, with blindstamp "ATELIER CROMMELYNCK PRESSES DUTROU PARIS" Size: Image size: 440 x 380 MMS ; Paper size 500 X 670 mms Edition: XVI/XX Publisher: The Society des Bibliophiles de France, Paris Note: There was also a version of this in Black and White which was possibly a state of our piece (Vallier 106) Reference: Dora Vallier “Braque: The Complete Graphics” Number 105 after George Braque (1882 - 1963) Title: Les Fleurs Violets Bouquet des Fleurs Medium: Etching and Aquatint in colours, circa 1955/60, on Arches watermarked paper, signed by the artist in pencil, with blindstamp "ATELIER CROMMELYNCK PARIS" Size: Image size: 19 in x 11 5/8 in (48.3 cm x 29.5 cm) ; Paper size 26 in x 19 3/4 in (66 cm x 50.2 cm) Edition: 92/200 - There was also an edition of 50 on Japan paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Vase De Fleurs Dans La Fenêtre
    SP 5425 MARC CHAGALL Vitebsk, Russia 1887 - 1985 Saint-Paul-de-Vence, France Vase de fleurs dans la fenêtre Signed lower right: Chagall Gouache and pastel on paper laid down on board: 24 3/16 x 19 7/16 in / 61.5 x 49.4 cm Frame size: 34 in / 88.6 x 76.8 cm Painted in 1935-36 Provenance: James Vigeveno Galleries, Los Angeles Joan Fontaine (1917-2013), Los Angeles, acquired from the above circa 1945 and sold to benefit The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Monterey County, California Exhibited: Pasadena Art Museum, Seventieth Anniversary Exhibition, Marc Chagall, 26th May – 28th July 1957, no. 28 (as Flowers, 1938) The Comité Marc Chagall has confirmed the authenticity of this work and is recorded by them as No: 2008086. “Supernatural” declared the French poet and art critic, Guillaume Apollinaire, upon seeing Chagall’s work for the first time. An apt description of this remarkable, luxuriant flower piece whose fantastic, iridescent forms entwine into rich, intricate layers of texture and tone. Rising from a small, central vase, Chagall’s intense and exubrant flowers almost fill the canvas, the vibrant blooms exploding from their verdant, blue/green foliage like fireworks. A delicate balance of painting and drawing, the arrangement defines and densely layers a variety of flora, contrasting luscious passages of brilliant, opaque colour with bright patches of paper, revealing the artist’s sophisticated gouache technique and power as a colourist. A lyrical painter-poet in his own right, Chagall’s vital vision of miraculous bounty is framed, but not bounded by an open window on the left with two ethereal figures delineated beneath in a pale, otherworldly predella.
    [Show full text]
  • Paris, 1918-45
    un :al Chapter II a nd or Paris , 1918-45 ,-e ed MARK D EVOTO l.S. as es. 21 March 1918 was the first day of spring. T o celebrate it, the German he army, hoping to break a stalemate that had lasted more than three tat years, attacked along the western front in Flanders, pushing back the nv allied armies within a few days to a point where Paris was within reach an oflong-range cannon. When Claude Debussy, who died on 25 M arch, was buried three days later in the Pere-Laehaise Cemetery in Paris, nobody lingered for eulogies. The critic Louis Laloy wrote some years later: B. Th<' sky was overcast. There was a rumbling in the distance. \Vas it a storm, the explosion of a shell, or the guns atrhe front? Along the wide avenues the only traffic consisted of militarr trucks; people on the pavements pressed ahead hurriedly ... The shopkeepers questioned each other at their doors and glanced at the streamers on the wreaths. 'II parait que c'ctait un musicicn,' they said. 1 Fortified by the surrender of the Russians on the eastern front, the spring offensive of 1918 in France was the last and most desperate gamble of the German empire-and it almost succeeded. But its failure was decisive by late summer, and the greatest war in history was over by November, leaving in its wake a continent transformed by social lb\ convulsion, economic ruin and a devastation of human spirit. The four-year struggle had exhausted not only armies but whole civiliza­ tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Existing Readings of Marc Chagall's Crucifixion Paintings
    Resistance, Resurrection, Liberation: Beyond the Existing Readings of Marc Chagall’s Crucifixion Paintings A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art in Art History in the Department of the School of Art of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning (DAAP) by Jennifer Horvath March 10, 2015 B.S. University of Virginia May, 1993 Committee Chair: Kimberly Paice, Ph.D. Abstract This study deals with a small body of crucifixion scenes that were rendered by the well- known Russian and Jewish Expressionist artist Marc Chagall (1887-1985). It closely reads these works, made between 1937 and 1952 when Chagall lived in exile in France and the United States. Extensive scholarship and The Jewish Museum’s exhibition Chagall: Love, War, and Exile (2013-14), have emphasized ways that these paintings speak to the then-current tragedies and suffering of Jews associated with the Holocaust. This study builds on this established research. Yet, it offers a nuanced reading of the iconographical and compositional strategies that Chagall uses. Here, the lyrical-expressionist style and dream-like spatial qualities of his early modernist works infuses his painted crucifixions with the condition of exile. By emphasizing the circulation of the affects of love and hate through a network of signs, Chagall ties the theme of the crucifixion to a life of perpetual exile and to the sense of not belonging that goes with such a life. As explained in the study, Chagall’s crucifixion scenes relate as much to the suffering of humanity and Jews in the Holocaust as to the hoped-for liberation and subsequent failed promises of the Russian Revolution, to Chagall’s childhood in the Pale of Settlement, and to his lifelong experience of exile and desire to find a place in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Litvak Art in the Context of the Ecole De Paris ANTANAS ANDRIJAUSKAS
    Litvak Art in the Context of the Ecole de Paris ANTANAS ANDRIJAUSKAS Introduction Some studies, like this one, begin as fragmentary thoughts recorded on various occasions: they are born naturally and imperceptibly when the time is right. In my childhood, while wandering with a fishing pole outside Veisiejai near Lake Ančia, I slipped, and my feet disturbed a thick layer of moss under which was buried a dark stone with strange characters in an unknown language. My elders later told me that these were vestiges of the Lithuanian Jewish culture that had once existed here. That was my first contact with the culture of Lith- uanian Jews, the Litvaks. I learned that before World War II, in Veisiejai, a small town in Dzūkija, there had been a large Jewish community. The inventor of Esperanto, L. L. Zamenhof, had also lived here. When I moved there with my parents after the war, at the age of six, there were no Litvaks left in this town. The entire community was mercilessly annihilated. Much later, in my travels, I continued to encounter, in various contexts, manifestations of Litvak culture - works in Parisian exhibition halls and galleries with the names of Jew- ish Litvak artists who represented the third generation resid- ing abroad. Next to their names I often saw the words litvak or juif d'origine lituanicnne. It greatly intrigued me that in Paris so many people identified themselves with - and had roots in - ANTANAS ANDRIJAUSKAS is Head of the Department of Compara- tive Cultural Studies at the Institute for Culture, Philosophy, and Art, and President of the Lithuanian Aesthetic Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Mardi 15 Et Mercredi 16 Mai 2012
    ALDE ALDE Livres illustrés modernes - Éditions originales Estampes www.alde.fr 83 mardi 15 et mercredi 16 mai 2012 Livres illustrés modernes Éditions originales Estampes 158 Experts Pour les livres Dominique Courvoisier Expert de la Bibliothèque nationale de France Membre du syndicat français des experts professionnels en œuvres d'art Librairie Giraud-Badin 22, rue Guynemer 75006 Paris Tél. 01 45 48 30 58 - Fax 01 45 48 44 00 - www.giraud-badin.com Pour les estampes Hélène Bonafous-Murat Membre de la Compagnie Nationale des Experts 8, rue Saint-Marc 75002 Paris Tél. 01 44 76 04 32 - [email protected] Exposition à la Librairie Giraud-Badin du mercredi 9 au lundi 14 mai 2012 de 9 h à 13 h et de 14 h à 18 h (le lundi 14 mai jusqu'à 16 h) Exposition publique Salle Rossini le mardi 15 mai de 10 h à 12 h et le mercredi 16 mai de 10 h à 12 h Première vacation, le 15 mai Livres illustrés modernes : nos 1 à 387 Seconde vacation, le 16 mai Éditions originales : nos 388 à 471 Revues artistiques et littéraires : nos 472 à 494 Estampes : nos 495 à 606 MaisonALDE de ventes spécialisée Livres & Autographes Livres illustrés modernes Éditions originales Estampes Vente aux enchères publiques Les mardi 15 et mercredi 16 mai 2012 à 14 h Salle Rossini 7, rue Rossini 75009 Paris Tél. : 01 53 34 55 01 Commissaire-priseur Jérôme Delcamp ALDE Maison de ventes aux enchères 1, rue de Fleurus 75006 Paris Tél. 01 45 49 09 24 - Fax 01 45 49 09 30 - www.alde.fr 2 Vente du Mardi 15 Mai 2012 Livres illustrés modernes 1 ALAIN-FOURNIER.
    [Show full text]
  • Hommage À Chagall Spectacle Musical Teatr Groteska
    Service Jeune Public SAISON 2011-2012 Jeu Service Mirum: Vivamus est ipsum, vehicula nec, feugiat ne p rhoncus, accumsan id, nisl. Lorem ipsum dolor sit Jeune Public amet, consectetuer Dossier Dossier Pédagogique Hommage à Chagall Spectacle musical Entre théâtre et peinture, arts du masque et de Directeur : Adolf Weltschek - Scénographie : la marionnette, Adolf Weltschek et le Théâtre Malgorzata Mercredi 14 décembre Groteska de Cracovie rendent à travers leur ZwoliĎska - Musique et enregistrements 19h tournée européenne un hommage inspiré au sonores : Roman peintre Marc Chagall. Réalisé sans paroles, Opuszynski - Système de moteur : Katarzyna Seance scolaire : mais en musique, la performance revèle toute Skawinska - Jeudi 15 décembre la puissance poétique de l’univers artistiques de Directeur II : Lech Walicki - Mise en oeuvre de Chagall à travers ses personnages aériens, ses l'animation par ordinateur : Pawel Weremiuk 14h30 couleurs caractéristiques, ses motifs familiers Avec : Monika Filipowicz, Oliwia Jakubik, Diana comme le coq et le bœuf. Jedrzejewska, Maja Kubacka, Kataryna L’évocation prend la forme d’un véritable hymne Kuzmicz, Iwona Olszewska, Marek Karpowicz, Sommaire à l’amour, celui que porte le peintre à sa femme Bogdan Nowak / Pawel Mroz, Rafal Szumski, Belle. Préservé par l’harmonie de leur couple et Lech Walicki et Bartosz Watemborski Note d’intention 2 le pouvoir de l’union plus forte que la mort, Exposition au Musée des Beaux-Arts Marc et Bella Chagall échappent aux realités 2 sociopolitiques du XXème siècle. Entré dans Biographie 3 l’ordre cosmique et dépassant les contingences du monde réel, leur amour atteint une Quelques citations de Marc Chagall 4 dimension métaphysique.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreaming with Marc Chagall Grade Level Or Special Area: Visual Arts, Seventh Grade Written By: Sarah C
    Dreaming with Marc Chagall Grade Level or Special Area: Visual Arts, Seventh Grade Written by: Sarah C. Sykes, Frontier Academy, Greeley, CO Length of Unit: Four lessons (approximately seven days; one day = 50 minutes) I. ABSTRACT In the seventh grade, students study early twentieth-century artists who dealt with expressionism and abstraction. Marc Chagall was an artist working during the same time frame as Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, and Marcel Duchamp. Many of these artists, along with others, influenced the art of Marc Chagall. While studying other important artists of the time period it is important to look at Marc Chagall’s contributions as an artist. After looking at Chagall’s life and his artwork, the students will create works of art that are similar to Chagall’s style. II. OVERVIEW A. Concept Objectives 1. Students will recognize and use the visual arts as a form of communication. (Colorado Model Content Standard 1) 2. Students will understand visual arts materials, tools, techniques, and processes. (Colorado Model Content Standard 3) 3. Students will recognize the characteristics, merits, and meaning of works of art. (Colorado Model Content Standard 5) B. Content from the Core Knowledge Sequence 1. Visual Arts: Expressionism and Abstraction: Examine representative artists and works, including Marc Chagall, I and the Village (p. 168) C. Skill Objectives 1. Students will learn to identify artwork created by Marc Chagall. 2. Students will compare Marc Chagall’s work with other artists of the same time. 3. Students will formulate responses to works of art from personal and critical points of view. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the July Monarchy (1830-1848)
    REPRESENTATIONS OF “LE TRAVAIL” UNDER THE JULY MONARCHY (1830-1848) by Rebecca Terese Powers A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland July, 2015 Representations of le travail under the July Monarchy ABSTRACT This project traces the definition of a social reality of labor under the July Monarchy. More specifically, it investigates how the ubiquitous but elusive term travail – understood as manual, non-agricultural work – operates at different levels of discourse in the 1830s and 1840s. To underline this specific cultural context, I employ the French travail rather than the English “work” or “labor.” French workers expected improved social conditions after their contribution to the 1830 Revolution, but were promptly denied this by the new Constitutional Monarchy. Their frustration came to a head in 1848, when they again revolted, demanding the right to work – le droit au travail. This moment is often considered the dawn of the French labor movement, but I contend that it is in the years leading up to 1848 that travail undergoes its most dramatic definition and consecration as a modern value. In order to better understand how the term took on such significance, I examine a variety of cultural documents, both literary and what we would today consider paraliterary. The corpus includes novels by Honoré de Balzac and George Sand; moralist inquiries by René Villermé and Honoré-Antoine Frégier; Jules Michelet’s historiography of the French people; and writings by the workers themselves, whose first-hand accounts of physical labor were becoming increasingly influential.
    [Show full text]
  • Modigliani Large Print Guide Room 1–11
    MODIGLIANI 23 November 2017 – 2 April 2018 LARGE PRINT GUIDE Please return to exhibition entrance RO OM 1–11 CONTENTS Room 1 4 Room 2 7 Room 3 18 Room 4 28 Room 5 36 Room 6 43 Room 7 53 Room 8 68 Room 9 77 Room 10 85 Room 11 91 Find Out More 100 5 6 4 7 3 8 2 9 1 10 10 11 Let us know what you think #Modigliani 3 ROOM 1 4 Open To Change When Amedeo Modigliani (1884–1920) decided to leave Italy to develop his career as an artist, there was only one place to go. In 1906, at the age of 21, he moved to Paris. Many factors shaped his decision. Born in the port city of Livorno, he belonged to an educated family of Sephardic Jews (descended from Spain and Portugal), who encouraged his ambition and exposed him to languages and literature. He had seen great Renaissance art and had trained as a painter. But Paris offered excitement. Paris offered variety. There he would encounter ways of thinking, seeing and behaving that challenged and shaped his work. This exhibition opens with a self-portrait, painted around 1915, in which Modigliani presents himself as the tragic clown Pierrot. His contemporaries would have recognised the reference instantly as, at the time, the figure appeared in countless pictures, plays and films. A young person shaping their identity could relate to Pierrot, a stock character open to interpretation, linked to the past and looking towards the future. Pierrot could be comedic, melancholy or romantic, played by any actor or painted by any artist.
    [Show full text]