DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 1995 / Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 1995 / Notices 18474 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 1995 / Notices ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION number of Federal facilities listed on the 120(c) of CERCLA; and (3) to provide a AGENCY docket is 2,070. mechanism to make the information DATES: This list is current as of available to the public. [FRL±5177±9] September 10, 1994. The initial list of Federal facilities to Federal Agency Hazardous Waste FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: be included on the docket was Toll-Free Telephone Line for the Compliance Docket published on February 12, 1988 (53 Docket, Telephone: (800) 548±1016, or Federal Register [F.R.] 4280). Updates of AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection locally (703) 883±8577. the docket have been published on Agency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: November 16, 1988 (54 F.R. 46364); ACTION: Notice of Ninth Update of the December 15, 1989 (54 F.R. 51472); Table of Contents Federal Agency Hazardous Waste August 22, 1990 (55 F.R. 34492); Compliance Docket, Pursuant to 1. Introduction September 27, 1991 (56 F.R. 49328); CERCLA Section 120(c). 2. Revisions of the Previous Docket 3. Process for Compiling the Updated Docket December 12, 1991 (56 F.R. 64898); July 4. Facilities Not Included 17, 1992 (57 F.R. 31758); February 5, SUMMARY: Section 120(c) of the 5. Information Contained on Docket Listing 1993 (58 F.R. 7298); and November 10, Comprehensive Environmental 6. Facility Status Reporting 1993 (58 F.R. 59790). This notice Response, Compensation, and Liability 1. Introduction constitutes the ninth update of the Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended by docket. the Superfund Amendments and Section 120(c) of the Comprehensive Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), Environmental Response, Today's notice is divided into four requires the Environmental Protection Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 sections: (1) additions, (2) deletions, (3) Agency (EPA) to establish a Federal (CERCLA), 42 United States Code corrections, and (4) a list of facilities Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance (U.S.C.) 9620(c), as amended by the classified as no further remedial action Docket. The docket is to contain certain Superfund Amendments and planned (NFRAP). The additions section information about Federal facilities that Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), lists newly identified facilities that have manage hazardous waste or from which required the establishment of the been reported to EPA since the last hazardous substances have been or may Federal Agency Hazardous Waste update and that now are being included be released. (As defined by CERCLA Compliance Docket. The docket on the docket. The deletions section section 101(22), a release is any spilling, contains information on Federal lists facilities that EPA is deleting from leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, facilities that is submitted by Federal the docket. The corrections section lists emptying, discharging, injecting, agencies to the U.S. Environmental changes in information about facilities escaping, leaching, dumping, or Protection Agency (EPA) under sections already listed on the docket. The disposing into the environment.) 3005, 3010, and 3016 of the Resource NFRAP list is the list of all docket CERCLA requires that the docket be Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), facilities to which EPA has assigned a updated every six months, as new 42 U.S.C. 6925, 6930, and 6937 and status of no further remedial action facilities are reported to EPA by Federal under section 103 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. planned. agencies. The following list identifies 9603. Specifically, RCRA section 3005 The information submitted to EPA on the Federal facilities to be included in establishes a permitting system for each Federal facility is maintained in the ninth update of the docket (that is, certain hazardous waste treatment, the docket repository located in the EPA facilities not previously listed on the storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities; Regional office of the Region in which docket and reported to EPA since the RCRA section 3010 requires waste the facility is located (see 53 F.R. 4280 last update of the docket, 58 Federal generators and transporters and TSD [February 12, 1988] for a description of Register [F.R.] 59790, November 10, facilities to notify EPA of their the information required under those 1993, which was current as of July 16, hazardous waste activities; and RCRA provisions). Each repository contains 1993). EPA policy specifies that, for section 3016 requires Federal agencies the documents submitted to EPA under each Federal facility that is included on to submit biennially to EPA an the reporting provisions and the docket during an update, the inventory of hazardous waste sites that correspondence relevant to the reporting responsible Federal agency must the Federal agencies own or operate. provisions for each facility. A complete complete a preliminary assessment (PA) CERCLA section 103(a) requires that the national index of the information found and, if warranted, a site inspection (SI) National Response Center (NRC) be in the Regional docket repositories is within 18 months of publication of the notified of a release. CERCLA section maintained at EPA's Federal Facilities notice. Such site evaluation activities 103(c) requires reporting to EPA the Enforcement Office in Washington, D.C. will help determine whether the facility existence of a facility at which and is available to the public. The index should be included on the National hazardous substances are or have been for each Region is available for public Priorities List (NPL) and will provide stored, treated, or disposed of and the review at each Regional repository. EPA and the public with valuable existence of known or suspected Contact the toll-free telephone line for information about the facility. In releases of hazardous substances at such the docket at (800) 548±1016, or locally addition to the list of additions to the facilities. docket, this notice includes a section The docket serves three major (703) 883±8577, for information on that comprises revisions (that is, purposes: (1) to identify all Federal locations of Regional repositories and corrections and deletions) of the facilities that must be evaluated to on making arrangements to obtain previous docket list and a list of the determine whether they pose a risk to specific documents. facilities on the docket that have been human health and the environment 2. Revisions of the Previous Docket evaluated and determined to be not sufficient to warrant inclusion on the appropriate for listing on the NPL at this National Priorities List (NPL); (2) to Following is a discussion of the time (the no further remedial action compile and maintain the information revisions of the previous docket, planned [NFRAP] list). At the time of submitted to EPA on such facilities including additions, deletions, and publication of this notice, the new total under the provisions listed in section corrections. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 1995 / Notices 18475 2.1 Additions In the process of compiling the 2.2 Deletions documents for the Regional repositories, Today, 106 facilities are being deleted Today, 231 facilities are being added EPA identified a number of facilities to the docket, primarily because of new from the docket for various reasons, that had previously submitted PA such as incorrect reporting of hazardous information obtained by EPA (for reports, SI reports, Department of example, recent reporting of a facility waste activity, change in ownership, Defense (DoD) Installation Restoration pursuant to RCRA sections 3005, 3010, and exemption as an SQG under RCRA Program (IRP) reports, or reports under or 3016 or CERCLA section 103). For all (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] another Federal agency environmental facilities being added to the docket, it is Part 262.44). Facilities being deleted no EPA's policy that the responsible restoration program, but had not longer will be subject to the Federal agency must complete the submitted a notification form under requirements of CERCLA section 120(d). CERCLA section 103. Section 120(c)(3) required preliminary assessment (PA) 2.3 Corrections and, if warranted, a site inspection (SI) of CERCLA requires that EPA include within 18 months of the date of this on the docket information submitted Changes necessary to correct the publication. under section 103. In general, section previous docket were identified by both 103 requires certain persons to provide EPA and Federal agencies. The changes Of the 231 facilities being added to notice of certain releases of hazardous needed varied from simple changes in the docket, 20 are facilities that have substances. The reports under Federal addresses or spelling to corrections of reported to the NRC the release of a the recorded name and ownership of a reportable quantity (RQ) of a hazardous agency environmental restoration programs mentioned above contain facility. In addition, some changes in substance. Under section 103(a) of the names of facilities were made to CERCLA, a facility is required to report information similar to that provided pursuant to CERCLA section 103 and establish consistency in the docket. to the NRC the release of a hazardous Many new entries are simply substance in a quantity that equals or are considered equivalent forms of notification for the docket. Thus, EPA corrections of typographical errors. For exceeds the established RQ. Reports of each facility for which a correction has releases received by the NRC, the U.S. believes that a facility that has provided information equivalent to a CERCLA been entered, the original entry Coast Guard (USCG), and EPA are (designated by an ``O''), as it appeared section 103 notification, such as a report transmitted electronically to the in the February 12, 1988 notice or under a Federal agency environmental Transportation Systems Center at the subsequent updates, is shown directly restoration program, should be included U.S. Department of Transportation below the corrected entry (designated by on the docket, regardless of the absence (DOT), where they become part of the a ``C'') for easy comparison.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
    IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Environmental Setting The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department maintains more than 200 parks, playgrounds, and open spaces throughout the City. The City’s park system also includes 15 recreation centers, nine swimming pools, five golf courses as well as tennis courts, ball diamonds, athletic fields and basketball courts. The Recreation and Park Department manages the Marina Yacht Harbor, Candlestick (Monster) Park, the San Francisco Zoo, and the Lake Merced Complex. In total, the Department currently owns and manages roughly 3,380 acres of parkland and open space. Together with other city agencies and state and federal open space properties within the city, about 6,360 acres of recreational resources (a variety of parks, walkways, landscaped areas, recreational facilities, playing fields and unmaintained open areas) serve San Francisco.172 San Franciscans also benefit from the Bay Area regional open spaces system. Regional resources include public open spaces managed by the East Bay Regional Park District in Alameda and Contra Costa counties; the National Park Service in Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties as well as state park and recreation areas throughout. In addition, thousands of acres of watershed and agricultural lands are preserved as open spaces by water and utility districts or in private ownership. The Bay Trail is a planned recreational corridor that, when complete, will encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays with a continuous 400-mile network of bicycling and hiking trails. It will connect the shoreline of all nine Bay Area counties, link 47 cities, and cross the major toll bridges in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table S1: Developed Sites Comprising the 1998 Baseline and Subsequent Changes Last Updated: 3/31/2015
    Supplemental Table S1: Developed Sites Comprising the 1998 Baseline and Subsequent Changes Last Updated: 3/31/2015 Table S1. Developed sites (name and type) comprising the 1998 baseline and subsequent changes per Bear Management Subunit inside the Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone (Developed sites that are new, removed, or in which capacity of human-use has been modified since 1998 are highlighted and italicized). Bear Management Admin Name and type of developed sites subunit Unit Developed Campgrounds: Cave Falls. Trailheads: Coyote Meadows, Hominy Peak, S. Boone Creek, Fish Lake, Cascade Creek. Major Developed Sites: Loll Scout Camp, Idaho Youth Services Camp. Administrative or Maintenance Sites: Squirrel Meadows Guard Station/Cabin, Porcupine Guard Station, Badger Creek Seismograph Site, and Squirrel Meadows CTNF GS/WY Game & Fish Cabin. Other Developed Sites: Grassy Lake Dam, Tillery Lake Dam, Indian Lake Dam, Bergman Res. Dam, Loon Lake Disperse sites, Horseshoe Lake Disperse sites, Porcupine Creek Disperse sites, Gravel Pit/Target Range, Boone Creek Disperse Sites, Tillery Lake O&G Camp, Calf Creek O&G Camp, Bergman O&G Camp, Granite Creek Cow Camp, Poacher’s TH, Indian Meadows TH, McRenolds Res. TH/Wildlife Viewing Area/Dam. Bechler/Teton #1 Trailheads: 9K1 and Cave Falls. Administrative or Maintenance Sites: South Entrance and Bechler Ranger Stations. YNP Other Developed Sites: Union Falls and Snake River picnic areas. Developed Campgrounds: Grassy Lake Road campsites (8 individual car camping sites). Trailheads: Glade Creek, Lower Berry Creek, Flagg Canyon. Major Developed Sites: Flagg Ranch (lodge, cabins and Headwater Campground with camper cabins, remote cistern and sewage treatment plant sites). Administrative or Maintenance Sites: Flagg Ranch Ranger GTNP Station, Flagg Ranch employee housing, Flagg Ranch maintenance yard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Fill in San Francisco: a History of Change
    SDMS DOCID# 1137835 BAY FILL IN SAN FRANCISCO: A HISTORY OF CHANGE A thesis submitted to the faculty of California State University, San Francisco in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Gerald Robert Dow Department of Geography July 1973 Permission is granted for the material in this thesis to be reproduced in part or whole for the purpose of education and/or research. It may not be edited, altered, or otherwise modified, except with the express permission of the author. - ii - - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Maps . vi INTRODUCTION . .1 CHAPTER I: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF SAN FRANCISCO’S TIDELANDS . .4 Definition of Tidelands . .5 Evolution of Tideland Ownership . .5 Federal Land . .5 State Land . .6 City Land . .6 Sale of State Owned Tidelands . .9 Tideland Grants to Railroads . 12 Settlement of Water Lot Claims . 13 San Francisco Loses Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 14 San Francisco Regains Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 15 The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and the Port of San Francisco . 18 CHAPTER II: YERBA BUENA COVE . 22 Introduction . 22 Yerba Buena, the Beginning of San Francisco . 22 Yerba Buena Cove in 1846 . 26 San Francisco’s First Waterfront . 26 Filling of Yerba Buena Cove Begins . 29 The Board of State Harbor Commissioners and the First Seawall . 33 The New Seawall . 37 The Northward Expansion of San Francisco’s Waterfront . 40 North Beach . 41 Fisherman’s Wharf . 43 Aquatic Park . 45 - iii - Pier 45 . 47 Fort Mason . 48 South Beach . 49 The Southward Extension of the Great Seawall .
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cold War Scrapbook Compiled by Frances Mckenney, Assistant Managing Editor
    Cold War Scrapbook Compiled by Frances McKenney, Assistant Managing Editor The peace following World War II was short- lived. Soviet forces never went home, kept occupied areas under domination, and threatened free nations worldwide. By 1946, Winston Churchill had declared, “An iron curtain has descended across the conti- nent.” Thus began a 45-year struggle between the diametrically opposed worldviews of the US and the Soviet Union. In 1948, the USSR cut off land access to free West Berlin, launch- ing the first major “battle” of the Cold War: the Berlin Airlift. Through decades of changes in strategy, tactics, locations, and technology, the Air Force was at the forefront. The Soviet Union was contained, and eventually, freedom won out. Bentwaters. Bitburg. Clark. Loring. Soes- terberg. Suwon. Wurtsmith—That so many Cold War bases are no longer USAF instal- lations is a tribute to how the airmen there did their jobs. While with the 333rd Tactical Fighter Training Squadron at Davis-Monthan AFB, Ariz., in 1975, Capt. Thomas McKee asked a friend to take this “hero shot” of him with an A-7. McKee flew the Corsair II as part of Tactical Air Command, at Myrtle Beach AFB, S.C. He was AFA National President and Chairman of the Board (1998-2002). Assigned to the 1st Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, Beale AFB, Calif., RSO Maj. Thomas Veltri (right) and Maj. Duane Noll prepare for an SR-71 mission from RAF Mildenhall, UK, in the mid- 1980s. Veltri’s most memora- ble Blackbird sortie: “We lost an engine in the Baltic, north of Gotland Island, and ended up at 25,000 feet, with a dozen MiGs chasing us.” Retired Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Valley Air Force Station East Is-Ridgecrest Boulevard, Mount Tarua.Lpais Mill Valley Vicinity .Marin County Califomia
    Mill Valley Air Force Station HABS No. CA-2615 East iS-Ridgecrest Boulevard, Mount Tarua.lpais Mill Valley Vicinity .Marin County califomia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94107 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY MILL VALLEY AIR FORCE STATION HABS No. CA-2615 Location: On the summit of Mount Tamalpais in Marin County, California Off of California State Highway 1 on East Ridg~~rest Boulevard. West of Mill Valley, California. North of San Francisco, California. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: 10.535320.4197 420 10.535000.4197000 I 0.534540.4196680 10.534580.4197000 10.535000.4197260 Present Owner: National Park Service leases the land from the Marin Municipal Water District. Present Occupant: Mostly vacant except for the operations area which is occupied by the Federal Aviation Administration Facility Present Use: Federal Aviation Administration Facility Significance: Mill Valley Air Force Station (MVAFS) played a significant role in the United States Air Defense system during the period of the Cold War. The threat of Soviet nuclear and air force power warranted the construction of early warning radar stations throughout the country. With the opening of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent end to the Cold War, retrospective scholarship has labeled contributing defense systems, such as early warning radar, important features of United States military history. In fact, America's first major construction project as a result of Cold War hostilities was, apparently, the system of early warning radar stations of which Mill Valley Air Force Station was one.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Alaska Itb Number 2515H029 Amendment Number One (1)
    STATE OF ALASKA ITB NUMBER 2515H029 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (1) AMENDMENT ISSUING OFFICE: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Room 145) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE AMENDMENT ISSUED: February 9, 2015 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals ITB OPENING DATE AND TIME: February 27, 2015 @ 2:00 PM Alaska Time The following changes are required: 1. Attachment A, DOT/PF Maintenance Stations identifying the address and contact information and is added to this ITB. This is a mandatory return Amendment. Your bid may be considered non-responsive and rejected if this signed amendment is not received [in addition to your bid] by the bid opening date and time. Becky Gattung Procurement Officer PHONE: (907) 465-8949 FAX: (907) 465-2024 NAME OF COMPANY DATE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations SOUTHEAST REGION F.O.B. POINT Contact Name: Contact Phone: Cell: Juneau: 6860 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801 Eric Wilkerson 465-1787 723-7028 Gustavus: Gustavus Airport, Gustavus, AK 99826 Brad Rider 697-2251 321-1514 Haines: 720 Main St., Haines, AK 99827 Matt Boron 766-2340 314-0334 Hoonah: 700 Airport Way, Hoonah, AK 99829 Ken Meserve 945-3426 723-2375 Ketchikan: 5148 N. Tongass Hwy. Ketchikan, AK 99901 Loren Starr 225-2513 617-7400 Klawock: 1/4 Mile Airport Rd., Klawock, AK 99921 Tim Lacour 755-2229 401-0240 Petersburg: 288 Mitkof Hwy., Petersburg, AK 99833 Mike Etcher 772-4624 518-9012 Sitka: 605 Airport Rd., Sitka, AK 99835 Steve Bell 966-2960 752-0033 Skagway: 2.5 Mile Klondike Hwy., Skagway, AK 99840 Missy Tyson 983-2323 612-0201 Wrangell: Airport Rd., Wrangell, AK 99929 William Bloom 874-3107 305-0450 Yakutat: Yakutat Airport, Yakutat, AK 99689 Robert Lekanof 784-3476 784-3717 1 of 6 ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations NORTHERN REGION F.O.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation to Bid Invitation Number 2519H037
    INVITATION TO BID INVITATION NUMBER 2519H037 RETURN THIS BID TO THE ISSUING OFFICE AT: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Suite 350) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE ITB ISSUED: January 24, 2019 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals SEALED BIDS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE STATEWIDE CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT OFFICE AND MUST BE TIME AND DATE STAMPED BY THE PURCHASING SECTION PRIOR TO 2:00 PM (ALASKA TIME) ON FEBRUARY 14, 2019 AT WHICH TIME THEY WILL BE PUBLICLY OPENED. DELIVERY LOCATION: See the “Bid Schedule” DELIVERY DATE: See the “Bid Schedule” F.O.B. POINT: FINAL DESTINATION IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you received this solicitation from the State’s “Online Public Notice” web site, you must register with the Procurement Officer listed on this document to receive subsequent amendments. Failure to contact the Procurement Officer may result in the rejection of your offer. BIDDER'S NOTICE: By signature on this form, the bidder certifies that: (1) the bidder has a valid Alaska business license, or will obtain one prior to award of any contract resulting from this ITB. If the bidder possesses a valid Alaska business license, the license number must be written below or one of the following forms of evidence must be submitted with the bid: • a canceled check for the business license fee; • a copy of the business license application with a receipt date stamp from the State's business license office; • a receipt from the State’s business license office for
    [Show full text]
  • Rushton F.Qxp 5/12/2005 3:57 PM Page 289
    Rushton F.qxp 5/12/2005 3:57 PM Page 289 INDEX 3rd Infantry Division, 228 98th General Hospital, 224 7th Army, 33, 41 101st Airborne Division, 42 7th Service Command, 97 109th General Hospital, 32 11th Field Hospital, 52 120th General Hospital, 94 20th Infantry Division, 269 125th Combat Support Hospital, 248 22nd General Hospital, 50 144th Evacuation Hospital, 200, 205, 235, 237, 241 27th Evacuation Hospital, 41 148th General Hospital, 100, 102 27th Field Hospital, 62, 67 181st General Hospital, 72 30th Medical Brigade, 229 220th General Hospital, 51 31st General Hospital, 17 227th General Hospital, 51 38th Infantry, 79 233rd General Hospital, 62 38th parallel, 155, 156, 158 235th General Hospital, 43 43rd General Hospital, 43 303rd General Hospital, 94, 95 50th General Hospital, 248 320th Expeditionary Medical Support Group, 281 54th Field Hospital, 35, 42 325th General Hospital Army Reserve Unit, 247 67th Combat Support Hospital, 248 328th General Hospital, 223, 225, 235 67th Evacuation Hospital, 164 376th Hospital Unit, 64 71st Evacuation Hospital, 164 376th Station Hospital, 60, 62 71st Station Hospital, 156 507th Main Force Company, 228 81st Field Hospital, 31, 35, 37, 39, 43, 44 566th Area Support Medical Company 83rd General Hospital, 112 (ASMC), 229 85th Station Hospital, 81 807th Medical Air Evacuation Squadron, 111 95th Army Hospital, 187 934th Forward Surgical Team, 225, 233 289 Rushton F.qxp 5/12/2005 3:57 PM Page 290 Latter-day Saint Nurses at War Abegglen, JoAnn Coursey, 168–73 Bennett, Wallace F., 153 Ade, Wylma Jane Callahan,
    [Show full text]