cc
Mayor
Boris
Yours
do
Council
Having
Order,
notice
I
minded
Local Town
Queens
and
Dear
King
London
Agnieszka
5th
Development
London
refer
City
not
Floor,
2007;
Johnson
I
sincerely
Street
of
Agent,
London
Alex
Ms
Kit
to
National
Nicky
that
following
Planning
therefore
&
to
Hall,
to
London
W6
Wharf
your
Country
Malthouse, Borough
Nowak
determine
Hammersmith
grant
Williams,
was
Town
considered
Gavron,
9JU
Nowak
London,
Ms
SWS
letter
Management
Planning
issued
the
and
wish
planning
Authority
Jan
&
Planning
1
of
of
Transport
receipt
NZ
the
Country
Chair
Donovan, Riverside
to
London
on
SE1
6
Hammersmith
a
direct
Town
January
case
Casework
report
10
permission
of
of
2AA
Service
Reference:
January
Act
London
Assembly
itself,
Planning
referral
refusal
for
Hall
Rolfe
on
Studios
)
•
2014
1990
MAYOR
London
Unit,
this
mayor(&Nondon.gov.uk
Extension
subiect
for
2014
Judd
Assembly
or
documentation.
and
informing
case
Constituency
(as
DCLG
to the
(Mayor
201
under
Planning,
take
to
Fuiham
amended);
I
above
3/03799/FU
am
any
OF
Planning
over
content
the
me
of
action
planning
London)
that
Old
the
provisions
Member
LONDON
Greater
and
application
Church
that
to
Hammersmith
L
•
allow
application.
Housing
Iondon.gov.uk
the
Order
of
Court,
London
Secretary
Hammersmith
article
for
2008
Committee
Claylands
and
my
I
Your
Date:
Our
Sfl)(b)(i)
refer
Authority
own
of
Fulham
refi
•
ret
State
21
you
020
and
determination.
D&P/3213/PR
January
Road,
2013/03799/FUL
of
also
Council
may
7983
Fulham
Ads
the
The
to
take,
2014
above
4000
the
1999
Oval,
is and
wish
the
That
Recommendation
The
In
information
compliant
sustainable
housing, studio
At Strategic
The
The
riverside
and facilities
television
and proposal
The
Town
Demolition
Town
Strategic
this
GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY
case
consultation
to
Hammersmith Council’s
applicant
drink,
the
applicant
proposal
instance
direct
use
&
&
itself,
provision
walk
ancillary
Country
Country
residential
with
comprising
on
issues and
together
provided
planning
of
refusal development
this
subject
Queen’s
is
along
decision
the
Hammersmith
film
the
stage,
Mount
site
Planning
to
Planning
and
of
London
existing
recording
or
with
the
those
in
the to
165
was the
quality,
application
direct
Fulham
an
any
Anvil
frontage
car erection
residential
principle
acceptable;
attempt
uses Plan. (Mayor
Act
buildings
and action
and
that
and
studios,
Council
Ltd
children’s
1990
Wharf
in
including
transport
There cycle
he
Fulham of
of
the
to
that of
and
stage
to
the
units is
a
and
(as
storage,
resolve London) deliver
however, six
to be
parking,
have
the
the
London
site
amended); the Council
be
cafe, to
advised
II
(Class
playspace,
were
architect Secretary
subsequently
referral
facing
eight
the
planning and
redevelopment those a
dressing
Order
restaurant, mixed
storage further
local
0)
required
has
that
storey
Borough
the
issues,
Greater
and
is
2008
resolved
of
use
planning
Riverside the
Assael
urban
River
rooms,
and
information
State
application 8,633 building
for
development
been
bar
Mayor as
plant
London
Thames.
of
planning
the
detailed
design,
may
of
to
and
Architects.
offices,
authority.
sq.
the
design
scheme
grant
space
with
is
Hammersmith other
take,
m
site
content
in
Authority
of
in
relation theatre,
balconies
inclusive
alterations
permission.
via
and
and
commercial
no.
this
and
uses
report
to
Studio,
a
be
for
the
re-provision
report.
does
comprehensive
201
for
Acts
to
21
considered
cinema
it
creation
and
access,
the
affordable
to
3/03799/FUL
and
D&P/3213/02
not
January2014
1999
floor
determine
and
roof
sale
therefore
further
and
page
of
of
and
space
of terraces
Road
Crisp
Fuiham
as
other
a
the
food
fully
1
2007; for Context 1 Fulham develop to 2
3 the subsequently
the 4 to are 2014 and
Country proceed act application has www.london.gov.uk. 5
Update 6 application these above-mentioned the
•
the • •
possible London as
as
Fulham until
the Order Principle the 3.12 Housing: On need forward The it need regarding broadly Council set Cotegoiy or
proposal, Category the more the On
A deficiencies:
advised
The
At
Planning
unchanged, houses 24
refurbishment copy
Riverside 21
out
30 application
of above Local
to to the 2008,
Plan,
or
remedies Council September than decision
did January
advised
the
october
therein,
in be amend is notifying
issue of
consultation
of
The the 1,4 the acceptable 1 the
line not and Planning
independently
for sites London the C
25
as
(Mayor
development:
Studios
“Development (a)
report;
Mayor
applicants site, a approach decided
with comply follows: the
metres flats”. 2014 on direct Hammersmith the above-mentioned
set direction was
unless 2013 for
“Development
2013 of him
this
reasons
case
out
number
London Plan,
the Authority of
referable the
but to of
is
in Kammersmith
the
of with high stage
London) case that
otherwise
accepted. in this the
notify above strategic history, to
Riverside density
that a
the to
this
assessed Mayor
planning
set deliver
the and
Mayor it of and decision. Plan
which Hammersmith
The
Hammersmith
applicant
the was
to and for paragraph the
units out uses.
London
is which Order
the strategic
the calculations
principle policy considered
terms. stated the possible adjacent report minded
a Studios Fulham Notwithstanding Council comprises of in
by
per application 100% reasons and
Mayor
paragraph
London
purposes
Under comprises 2008
Hammersmith
will
3.4
Plan,
core.
in
Fulham is With
could
planning
to to
of Council is remedies
private
and this attached. to need and
and
under
the
will
acceptable planning the deliver grant or are his for
received the
The regards
address Fulham report. of
Fulbam
table includes
68 of Mayor
be
to decision or the Council requested. provisions
River
determining housing the
that
residential potential issues
planning
of
includes submit made this,
set
enabling
reasons and
3.3 The
the report to following
documents
may Council the On these Thames.” Council out
in
the
in under residential
respectively and Fulham and available
above-mentioned essentials
strategic
scheme
appropriate 18 order application
of
in allow
the provision strategic permission
D&P/3213/O1, set
residential deficiencies. density
to relevant
this Article December
the
Article
under was
erection Categories
out issue
to
Council.
the
from paragraph
to application. on
terms. satisfy quality, advised
of
in
5 of enable draft but Article importance
the of any 6
policies
did viability the
paragraph of
and
Hammersmith the to
development
of 2013,
750
further
the GLA’s
direction.
The
not polices refuse case decision of a
the
that on propo5ed
report;
7 refurbishment and
houses, could building
Town the
and that comply
housing 8 work Hammersmith
The
applicant with
website
the
January clarification
to
the
Schedule
3.11
58
guidance
address
he
but to
& Mayor
which regard
flats,
of
that scheme to
with and is
and
mix that page
the
to fund
will
is
will
of
put
2
is
density
been
10
provide
and
other would
9
is from
and
made
access
long,
S
well
within housing
affordable
of 106
the behalf
Riverside 7
•
•
•
acceptable
•
•
•
bespoke
River.
residential
submitted
London
as The
discussion
the paragraphs
106 Servicing three
Transport:
mechanisms the
Sustainable
London
convoluted
all,
accessible
Inclusive
some integral addition, undertake
Urban be
space
Children’s
At
of
The
the for
With
on
consideration of
At
offer ground
to single
472
applicant
use
consultation
agreement.
the
Studios
These
the
a
wrap
borough
consultation
applicant housing
amendments
meet
studio
good Is
regards
Plan,
in
of
design:
Plan. habitable
part and Council
lower
needed and
from
units the
this aspect.
the
heat access:
units
around 7
some level.
units
corridors,
London
to
playspace:
Further
residential
was
to
the
use
of space
has development:
Construction
applicant Council
in-lieu
regard
(as the
have
secure residential
to
has 22
pumps
the
of
and
The
and
stage, viability
are of for
minor
accepted.
The provided
verified
residential
rooms
One the
stage, the applicant,
below Further
shown to
a could proposed
been
Plan
the
information details
private
it proposed
of
and
payment to
has works
numbers
the
western
individual
and has
of
clarification changes
will quality
onsite
which
scheme
Further
per work
the set
Policies broadly
the separated
not floors
decided
by
lower
that information
further been Logistics
heating/cooling
need
of
units, Notwithstanding
and hectare quality,
out
which,
the
omission
units The
viably
design.
how
submitted provision,
design
curve in
and a
of there
(levels along
residential
concluded to
information high on
circumstances
financial
how
to
Council’s
lieu
3.8
complies
units
will
applicant
to
information
the
the has
comply
of
ensure trip
indicates into deliver
Plans
(hr/ha)
of
at
are
allocate
and
is
the number is
have
density
Crisp
of
scheme one
5tudio been is
per stage
the
acceptable,
generation, generally
separate
four
which
affordable
by required
7.2.
issues
obligations
should
Housing with
that
with
uses
core
that
to good
any
building should
Road loads the
amended and
and
this,
one that
units £405,000
of
calculations use
three).
addressing
is
would
of
affordable
the
Mayor’s
the London
and
have have
applicant
units
the
clarification
levels
on
be clusters in
it
for
accepted;
the and the
as
in
which
provide
and on
was
Riverside
development
parking
at housing
line as
balance
secured
order
to
scheme the
been been is
proposal,
secure
(up scheme Since
public so
first balance
a
of
the
for
requested.
Regeneration highlighted
with
Plan
Housing result
that
scheme
will
each the
light, has
to was
to
housing.
reduced addressed.
a
floor further
location
stage
however
and
to
acceptable. through
14 commuted is
realm a
Studio satisfy policy
comments of
have
issues
been
will it
requested.
minimum the in
acceptable accessed
enable
are the
the
has
units
cycling
and
SPG.
to
this
which
one,
be
three
clarification
corridors
will
Travel,
not independently
and off-site 3.6. applicants
that of a meet
outlined
Following
polices use
will
the
delivering
conditions
in
instance.
team).
dual
refurbishment
the
the
be
north
as includes matters some
made
payment
is
by
bedrooms
of
there
overlook
applicant
policy made
in clearly
Further
such wheelchair
Delivery aspect
applicant
two
individual
affordable 3.11
have
this
above;
facing
Given
cases)
in
further
were
approach
with a
DM5 the
with
5.2
inclusive
or this
re-provision
and
regard.
residential for
defined
been
and
the
work
assessed
will
and the
and
this
scheme page
of
some
regards
and
will
has
report.
3.12
of
homes cores
section the
Bridge
the
need
section
split
the
has
as
3 to
will
have
for
as
of
piay
on
to
to
In an Children’s_playspace:
11 has and should and tkb.an
the 12 required
stage, branding with submit shutters,
Council site. 13 development ownership. restaurant, metres link route. Inc wheelchair 14 wheelchair 7.2 In
Sjistajriabjejleveloprpent site 15 with the Transport addition
Thames vehicle 16 condition
now
will
the detailing
addition Lijs
the
is
and
stesign Since
scheme heat At be the
iye_de At
regard therefore
now The scheme details been
Concern to and
to
The residential
stage the of The on
3.8.
stage At
charging
applicant
Pathway, the consult
network increase
stage
scheme the overlooked kitchen
on site units The or accessible the sign stage of
applicant confirmed Council
for applicant to
is meets
of
Council
one, through fully the the
riverside one
outside
the was Council for
proposals need
design
one,
London’s will
with
one,
points metal southern entrance
activity and is and has further the under
complies energy contribution
London
also
has
be
now
to
the
has has
units
has from the TfL that the
site the now overall for a
has studios
located
secured provide
raised shutters
(EVCP’s). residential
applicant 5’s secured submitted acceptable
include
provided clarification GLA along section raised
hierarchy approval
redline cooling
in comments and secured will the half included Plan
with
provision.
line
design
in
and and
through help residential Lifetime
towards to 220
an
the
policy
a creates
relation
London
some appropriate with
106 boundary
number deliver network.
ha5
appropriate
the It information the appropriate entrance.
prior
further
and activate ground sq.m
kiosk
in was
was
agreement. of
the
confirmed 5.2. this
overlooking scheme quality
The
the
Homes. the
an has
to
to the
deemed Plan
also of
a
space
units
of Mayor’s
regard. information new commencement. innovative
scheme the scheme of floor
river child provided The this
applicant’s
matters
planning
The
requested
policy
of the
planning is
and planning
above public
Cycle along
The frontage. applicant
is design of acceptable that
play
acceptable,
footpath
application
SPG
expected
at
confirmed will across
Crisp
3.6.
scheme
relating
clarification
ground the Hire and access design space this
condition
as the provide
condition approach
that along conditions
Road
Riverside
requested
CCTV has a ground
Docking
With
scheme link
number
in as to
This complies relevant along solution to
floor however
site
that
also Crisp
this
and a
be that 545
cycle
will regards relating
minimum,
of condition
which to and
floor
active
all submitted level
southern regard.
Station relating link amendments will
Road. sq.m
the widens of also
at play
travel
parking, uses contributing
with not some
unit stage
generate elevation on
from to low
requires to
be space.
space of
within
will
the
the and
London the of to Since type also plans to included
play carbon changes
edge
one
the further
which the
signage be approximately south
design
energy provision was
requires
In
in
needed space 22 their the
which, Riverside were and consultation connected
quantum of
to
addition terms
Plan
baselines. needed; children
130
the side applicant information along were
the
the
of
for strategy secured
provision
along policies
the the so sq.
of
of of
16
the
this
that page electric of the
size. the
m to it
10
to In
by the
and
4
I
that
objections
responses
23
of
Response
accordance
22
necessary
Servicing
21
agreement 20
to
payable
19
Caroline
condition.
by
18
Legible
compliant
Council
17
•
•
•
•
• 187
•
•
•
•
completing
•
•
the
the
Inadequacy
Overshadowing
Impact
Poor
Overdevelopment
Negative
Development
Increased
vehicles.
Development
Questions
responses
Little
The
Overall,
A
The applicant,
A
applicant
A
An
to London
has
Street
Plans
framework
in
contribution
mitigation
received,
contribution
to
design
with
in
the
It
Council
with
additional
provision
support
pubkc
included
along
is
accordance
consultation
the
council
disappointing
have
impact
the
has
London
pressure
the
signage.
were
raised
of
claims
in
solution.
section
benefit
Crisp
consulted transport
the
been
information
is
will
line
London
of
travel
packages been
and
of
a
too
10
received
caused
of
and
the
of
following
relevant
over
in
lead
were
Plan
EVCP’s with
Road
on
secured
cycle
TfL
with
£157,000
loss
£15,000
excessive
secured
106
a
obtained
plan
application
then
conservation
parking
viability
Plan
to
issues
policy
the
that
previously
906
made
of
to
London
secured.
agreement.
parking
including
more
and
have
condition
submitted.
transferred
daylight/sunlight
the
opening
matters through
and
surrounding
this
by
has
to
raised
6.9.
available
in
for
monitoring
in
and
Grade
traffic
now
condition.
is
terms
deliver
has
(of
Plan been
the
spaces
the
acceptable
On
requested
The
the
12
were
area.
the
of
at
to
which
been
not
local
11*
development.
balance
policy
to
congestion
observation
secured
of
stage
this
secure
omission
at
applicant
a
section
were
occurred
TfL.
listed
occupier5
raised:
height
their new
fee
secured
area.
34
link.
6.3.
to
that
1
Further
in
has
requested
were
this
the
27
through
Hammersmith
have
pubic
neighbouring
transport
106
and of
Construction
has
Thames
space
and
been
and
application
by
provision.
representations,
in
affordable
in
been
agreement.
massing.
consultation
condition. now
September
discussions
the
will
TfL
secured
the
Cycle
at
terms.
addressed
form
cause
included
Pathway
recommends
stage
section
Bridge.
properties.
is
Hire
housing.
Management
of
through
considered
an
This
2013.
one
with
pie-stamped
session).
Docking
106 these
signage
97
increase
satisfactorily,
contribution
for
TfL
objections
In
that
agreement
the
the
spaces
response,
are
to
was
Station
of
and
In
section
this
scheme
required
be
terms
heavy
postcards
secured
and
Delivery
is
in
and
should
with
page
installed
towards
on
a
106
of
the
to
total
76
Queen
prior
5
the
be
by
and be 24
25
including objection 26
27 Fulham directly neighbourhood Plan.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• •
•
Consider
Other appropriate Andy
grounds
housing.
Chancellors
Environment
English
conditions. English
Hammersmith massing.
concerns Hammersmith
London
Port Queen The principle Thames impact Theatre
objection
Zac
and highlighted At
Zac An
Council) to
from
set
the
the consultees letter objection Slaughter
applicants Goldsmith
Goldsmith of
out
the including
on
time Heritage: Caroline Heritage
Mayor the London
Fire
regarding however, Water:
Trust: context
solution.
also raised also
local
in principle
Wharf
Crisp
opposition of
paragraph Agency: and
letter
wrote
notes
stating writing Society:
Mall
engagement responded
infrastructure. (MP)
(Labour
subject scale,
(Conservative
No Authority: Raised
Estate and
Road
(Archaeology):
Emergency
No object
height,
Management
of
from
objection
concerns to Residents
and
that objection.
that the
design/architectural re-development
No
Residents from the
30
to concerns
Submitted
Tenants
to MP
London
ClIr.
objection as
the report massing
above. appropriate the
Mayor
the
with
residents
follows:
for
No
Stephen over
subject offer
Planning re-development
height
Association:
MP
some the objection
Association. Assembly that Hammersmith):
Company objecting
and
No the and
supporting
of
subject
for
community.
to
specifically they
objection zero
soundness 26 Cowan planning a
Residents design
bulk
benefit appropriate Richmond
Authority:
objections
subject were
affordable Member merit,
to
to
and
Ltd:
These
(leader
put
comments appropriate Supports
the
has
conditions. subject
but
not massing,
towards
parking of
forward.
Association: Supports to scheme
no
Objects
Murad reiterated/reinforced that the Park consulted
planning had
of appropriate
No
housing
regard
to
the the
applicant’s
the been
objection. but
and lack height and
appropriate planning
raising
Qureshi
to
the opposition, redevelopment
current
to objected
conditions.
lack
of
scheme is made on North
scheme. the
not
and
affordable
Favour
planning
matters the
of
viability ha5 conditions.
historic
in directly scheme
impact
affordable
application.
Kingston):
to on planning
line
also
Hammersmith
the
height
a the as
conditions.
with
but number
and housing report. been
to on scheme set
is
reasons
not
the
skyline raises
the out
and
sent
No
an
Mayor,
of
page
London above.
and
in
for
and
6
determining
determining
representation
34
planning
Mayor
unreasonably;
Mayor 33
an
Other
hearing 32
Article
Financial
direct
and planning
may international
Greater
regard
Mayor
authority to
also
London) 31
Legal
with
I, tests
30
Article
addressed on
accepted
applicant’s
English development addressed.
quality, 29
appeal.
28
therefore
refuse
the
direct
conservation
has
Planning
has
if
Should
that conditions
set Following
7(3)
Should to
or may
considerations
he
policy.
local
London
Under
Under
the
in
7: acted Officers The
Order Heritage
the
public out considerations for permission
urban any
he
any has
refusal
by
and
Greater
also
Direction in
there
power
viability or
the planning
obligations, hearing
the
is
Other matters
in
deputy
the
GLA
the
Proceedings’)
either
approval the
reserved
Article of unreasonably
set to
behaved
2008
Authority,
design, that
leave
an inquiry.
and
Mayor
purpose
are
area!
the
Mayor
if
Council’s
is be
have
arrangements
officers. out
to
inquiry London.
matters
he
no directed
for Article
and a
has
the
the satisfied
Mayor
set
Listed the
issue
7 authority
that
planning
considers
his
matters sound
of
take
local made density,
of
a
unreasonably
direct
Government
been
regional out
Mayor negotiating local
of
decision
planning
details reasons
the
caused the
a Local
committee the
are raised
Kit determining
emphasises Bridge
over If
will
properties
in
direction
refusal
no
that
planning
planning
independently effect
Order
he
refusal,
Article met.
applications
Malthouse
must
obligation,
has strategic
Mayor
set
that
be objection
(unless matters,
the
decides planning
by were
to
in
strategic
application was
the
the
out
unreasonably; In
the the
on a the
issue
any
to
application
guidance
during
6(2)
under
direction report. he
this reason
and authority,
considered addressed
extent
is power
that
grant health in
direction.
the Mayor
the
local
transport
planning
to
would
such
to
Article
these
to
has
guidance, which
of
instance
impact
(unless
issues
direct
council
application Article
parties
the
assessed
be the
permission the
authority. for
to also
under
referred
and
as
in
could
to
be
the with
he
appeal.
which scheme.
satisfactorily
S
Circular overlooking,
he
the
Order,
in
raised
obligation.
refusal,
refuse, impact in
on
handled sustainable expressed
of the
he
would
7
the
usually
agrees
the
Article must
local
and
the
the
take
that
Mayor
the
social
on
directs
to
principal
he
Council
and
stage
by
including
would
In
stage
the
A refusal
behalf
03/2009
Town
him
and
costs have
he be over the
planning
has
With to
directing major a pay
objectors
6
infrastructure
any to
use
referral
his
is
the responsible
to
do
under
one He
addresses
parking Mayor
impact
taken
development
one
this
take
to
their regard be
has may
and of
regards party direct
notice. connected
objections
so). of
council factor
would
act
the
contrary in
the
(‘Costs
report application
the resolved
over
Article Country
be
own
from
refusal
account
authority
particular,
must
in
as
on
at
principal
to
levels
the
Council
awarded
River relation
If
in
to
also the
the any
to daylight/sunlight, the
this
for
expenses
the
Awards and
a
have
deciding
local
set
affordable
4 to
to
application.
do
the
planning
local matters
to
have
be holding
subsequent
Planning
national
matters
Thames. of
of application.
Mayor
good
the
out
it
and
so) provided
purposes grant
been
the
responsible planning
to Mayor
the
established
is
against
planning been
in scheme. his
noted
and
residential
the
arising
whether
impact
strategic
Order.
Appeals
raised
a
decides satisfactorily
set
authority
permission
policies
reasons,
housing,
(Mayor
The
findings
must
satisfactorily
page
the
The
the
appeal out
of
that
authority
from
of
at Mayor
the
impact
for He
7
the
policy have
in to
and and
the
stage
of
the are Conclusion 35
quality, matters, Council, 36 Fulham planning for
020 Cohn Justin 020
020 Lucy
further
7983
7983
7983
Bird1 Wilson,
Carr,
Further
Having children’s
committee
address which
4783 4895
4310 terms. information,
Case
Strategic
Senior
together information
email regard
Officer emaU
the
playspace,
report
Manager
[email protected] contact:
outstanding
[email protected] Planning
to
with
the
and
has
Development
—
details urban
planning
Manager
Development
its
been
issues
draft
design,
of
provided
(Development
conditions
the decision
&
that
Projects
& application,
inclusive
were
Projects
to
notice,
Team:
further
and
raised
Decisions)
access,
section
the this
at
support
stage matters
scheme
sustainable
106
affordable one.
legal
set
is
acceptable
out
agreement development
in
housing,
Hammersmith
in
imposed
strategic
residential and
transport
and by
the page
8
sets
and
statement
develop
(Mayor
1
Fulham
Context
the
fully
That
fully
Recommendation
and
quality, The
acceptable;
Strategic
GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY
The
The
and
riverside facilities
television
and
proposal
The
town
Demolition
Town
Strategic
his
out
Queens
possible
transport
comply
principle
applicant
compliant
drink,
Hammersmith
the
applicant
proposal
reasons
On
of
Council
&
&
information
the
provision
children’s
walk
ancillary Country
Country
setting
London)
comprising
24
and
issues
together
above
however,
remedies
with
of
September
to
planning
is
for
along
the
film
notifying
with
are
deliver
Mount
out
the
site Planning
Planning
taking
to
Order
of
required
existing
for and
recording
Wharf
the
with
playspace,
the
whether those
London
the
165
set
further
for
the
a
Fulham
London
Anvil
him
frontage
2013
2008
that
out
erection
car
mixed
the
application
residential
Mayor’s
uses
Act
buildings (Mayor
to
of
and
information
in
Plan
studios,
above
view.
he
the
the
address
Ltd
in
1990
a
this Council
use
including
Plan.
urban
considers
and cycle
planning
of
of
for
the
Mayor
Mayor
of
use
and
paragraph
The
development,
uses.
the
units
a
and
(as
the
storage,
London)
six
outstanding
parking,
in
be
the London
design,
site
Mayor
amended);
stage
the
of
has
in
to
reasons
deciding
cafe,
Riverside
(Class
Under
application
that
advised
architect
relation
London
eight
facing
planning
redevelopment
until
dressing
could
Order
the restaurant,
may
storage
inclusive
C3)
1
the
set
Borough
storey
and
4
that
what
referral
the
application concerns,
Greater
to
also
received
November
and
address
provisions
2008
is
out
of
re-provision
affordable
Assael
River
rooms,
the
and
decision
provide
application
building
8,633
potential
in
access,
bar
application,
London
paragraph
plant
planning
of
these Thames
documents
for
(new
Studio,
of
and
offices,
Architects.
complies
2013
sq.m the
of
other
the
to
Hammersmith
with
space
The
strategic
other
deficiencies.
sustainable
of
housing,
site
Authority
make.
of
scheme
to powers)
the
theatre,
Town 58
balconies
comments.
commercial
via
on
provide
no.
and
with report
from
uses
studio
of
balance,
a
importance
the
this
201
comprehensive
&
to
the
residential
Crisp
for
30
Acts
Hammersmith
Country
cinema
the
be
creation
development
and
use
report;
the D&P/3213/01
London
3/03799/FUL
October
This
considered
1999
floor
Council does
and
on
roof
sale
and
report to
Planning
this
but
space
and
of
not
page
Road
terraces
Plan,
of
Fuiham
other
with
a
site
that
food
and
yet
2013
2007;
1
as
for
is a 2008, 2
for 3
wwwi 4 required Site
5
Thames
6 two of 300 7 & distance north five Area B for structure/heritage 9 and and north balustrade proposed involve 10
City.
other
his •
•
the
to night
falls metres
Fuiham
£35
description
and on
(A4 own western The
Category
or Category
The Once more
The
six
The The
Circle, The
The development. The
follows:
some dong.o.v. to
and
bus
of
within houses
a
demolition buses (a) Hammersmith
application
• refer determination; •
to Mayor
application
Nature
both site
north nearest
site
Hammersmith Hammersmith
Thames than Core Hammersmith
routes
on alterations
the
Piccadilly
boundary Queens studio Riverside and into
the is
falls it 1 1A
(Nil
end
i
a
Hammersmith
C
25 Strategy
(Fulham
edge Ic. bounded
of back
scale
Conservation
asset
the ancillary (a) “Development
are section
Fuiham
within
path metres London’s
flats”.
of
building
and
is
Wharf “Development
site
also current to of
the
and of
referable
of Flyover) Studios, to
is
to
the the or
N97) Bridge and
Drawdock Palace
an one and
is
the
of
the by Environment
within
Reach
existing
high
recreational
District
the
allow
0.62
is
important the
riverside Mayor
Crisp
statement
is
Proposals
to complex
site
Fulham eastern Underground an
serving
Area
west
an
and and
is
Road). an Transport six, under
which
hectares
Conservation walking existing, the
and
listed
Road
lines). building
evolution
for is operational
the is (the which
and representing
Council
walk.
included
wall Council
within the adjacent
in
the
consideration
comprises Agency his facilities There
Map
on
grade nearest
to
south
Thames
the
The distance
in vacant
local
of
comprises
decision
for following
the this
on
Stations
size
(2011),
the 1950/SOs. the to
of
site are
has
London
Area, 11*
the
in west
east,
Flood to case bus
determine TV
section the
including
and
Mall Drawdock, the foreshore,
very four
or
and
three/four
accords resolved
the
at
site
as
stops
recording
and
Thames old will includes
Queen providing the
Categories
in Hammer5mith. or
is
Local
Zone
Conservation
is
good to River
bus
Road
and
split
the
includes
of
located wharf
be
residential
site
whether
on
a
a the routes
it to
the
Register
3. design
made
Caroline Thames.”
draw to public
into
including restaurant
Network
itself. Policy Fuiham is
the
storey
determine
Having
studio
Strategic
access
excellent buildings
formation
identified
of
approximately
the
two
provision
(190, docks
available
to
and transport the
Area,
Area, development
of The office
erection
Street
direct
Palace
main
to and (TLRN) regard
the
Schedule
Buildings
townscape
and 211,
and
Road
four the
levels
site
which
Archaeological The as
of
provision
theatre
building,
of
parts;
refusal; on
to
café.
Strategic
Road,
the
inlets).
application, 295
to accessibility
is
of
lines
150
is
setting the
Network the
of
within
50m
were
the
a
located
riverside to
of
and
to
accessibility. The
building
houses,
north,
GLA
arrangement (Hammersmith with a
take
the
Merit.
Hammersmith
of the and;
from
large
converted
220)
of
Site walking
Riverside
a
website
Order
(SRN)
350m cinema south. it
the
new
Priority River it
walk level
the
page
flats, over The number
HTC3
that
and is
listed
is
2
of
will
is Details of the proposal
11 The applicant is proposingto demolishthe existingstudios and other buildingcurrentlyon site and deliverreplacement television and recordingstudios and theatre, associated floorspace (includingdressing rooms,office, performingarts space, theatre, cinema and scene dock services providingon site deliveryspace for servicing)(8,633 sq.m.). Other facilitiesancillaryto those uses willalso be deliveredincludingcafe, restaurant, bar and other uses for the sale of food and drink. The development willalso include16S residentialunits built abovethe studio use; allof whichwill be deliveredwithin a sixto eight storey building.The proposal includesthe creation of a riverside walk along the frontage of the site facing the RiverThames.
12 It should be noted that the residentialdevelopment is intended to help generate funds to deliverthe new studio use.
Strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance
13 The relevant issues and corresponding policiesare as follows:
• Principleof development London Plan • Housing London Plan; Hou5ingSPO; HousingStrategy; draft Revised Housing Strategy; Providingfor Childrenand YoungPeople’s Play and Informal Recreation SPO; • Affordablehousing London Plan; HousingSPO;Housing Strategy; draft Revised Housing Strategy • Density London Plan; HousingSPO; • Urbandesign London Plan; • Access London Plan; AccessibleLondon: achieving an inclusive environment SPa; Planning and Access for Disabled People: a good practice guide (ODPM) • HistoricEnvironment London Plan; • Sustainabledevelopment London Plan; Sustainable Design and ConstructionSPO;Mayor’s Climate Change Adaptation Strategy; Mayor’s Climate Change Mitigation and EnergyStrategy; Mayor’s Water Strategy BlueRibbonNetwork London Plan Parking London Plan; the Mayor’s Transport Strategy
14 Forthe purposes of Section 38(6) of the Planningand CompulsoryPurchase Act2004, the development plan inforce for the area isthe Hammersmithand FulhamCoreStrategy (2010), Hammersmithand FulhamDevelopmentManagement LocalPlan (July2013) and the 2011 London Plan with 2013 Alterations.
15 The followingare also a relevant materialconsiderations:
• The NationalPlanningPolicyFrameworkand TechnicalGuideto the NationalPlanning PolicyFramework
• Hammersmithand FulhamLocalPlan Review- Issuesand Options Consultation(July 2013)
page 3 JThed
target 16 seeks Principle which visitors.
cultural Opportunity 17 strongly forward restaurant. The Table 22 Studio family Totals replacement 20 2bed Unit Housing regard. 21 development 18 sum AtfoxdablthousingAadjenuxe_spi.it residential an so affordable acceptable Studio5 1 19
need
bed
that
off-site
applicant
available
Size
to
to
one:
Hammersmith
of
units.
The
The
The
The
As In
In
it
and
On result
is
be increase supported.
32,210
can
total,
addition
a
shown
mix housing
location;
and
independently this
provision
applicant Proposed overall of
principle
London
reasonable
entertainment
Area)
of
Given
costs
be
will
has
in
is
the
Development
in
the
basis
the
additional confirmed
as
London’s
in
enable
submitted order
to between
mix
the
is
that
Riverside
follows
scheme
table
further Plan
scheme
and
of
01165
the
this, acceptable
is
residential
for
large
mix
also providing
to
all
a
policy Eulham’s
re-provision
one
assessed
the it
comply greater
enterprises supply
units
the for homes
information
2011 will
proposing
is
homes
financial
not a
studios
above,
scheme
viability
noted
the
scheme
4.6
deliver
are mix being
in
and
a
of
with
amount
per
overall is
this
supports by replacement, on
private,
615
recording
that housing
the
cost
2021. of
year
(as the
and
this
to
able report
165
is
London instance.
in
enhanced,
applicant
additional
deliver unable the
set proposals
this
Council
of
of
the
site
up
to
residential
an
the
the
46 68 and 165 33(20) Number 18(11) out affordable which
applicant’s
to
deliver
regard
benefits complex
is
in
Plan
continued (41) (28)
to 8,750
fir
delivery
2021.
supported
in
However,
in
a
(100)
before
is
4fit provide
central for
homes
table
and states
doing
requirements,
not
will
any
units,
of
for
sq.m
purpose
that
and
Table
the
housing
viability
proposing
the
and
one be
on
units
that
so
purpose’
per
London
success
any in
supporting scheme they by
of
all needed.
site
scheme sets
re
of
order
3.1
year
a London commercial
of
TV
affordable
(%)
provision
this
to
well
affordable
work
offer
a
which sets
the
studio/theatre
riverside of
to be (omitting
London-wide
studio
for
meets
report),
is
as
London’s
deliver
delivered
borough
states to financial
this Plan
facilities
referred
usual
will
its
of
recording housing.
policy
uses
to
housing.
location,
the residents, Policy
be
in
that
Earls any
associated
be
total
viability private; housing
diverse
which back
via
such
new
3.8
wholly
housing
affordable the
instead
Court
3.3,
a
28% facilities
in
Riverside at the
scheme
as
financial
includes
workers
which
this
range
the
stage
targets,
report
a
mix
will
delivery
cafe page
of
units.
put
is on
of
be two
4
will and
and
the
of
play
Design incorporates
includes
in
29
above
28
be
development
playspace
children
27
Neighbourhoods:
Children’s
calculations,
stage with
townscape
are
hectare;
range total
characteristics 26
P_enity
scheme
accessible
lower
Given
three)
welcomed. In
the
on
number
25
supported,
units
24 space
that
Mayor’s
requirements good;
23
Resid
not
some
Table
site and
and
With
public
5,009
two
The
a of
Using
floors
there
within
that (3
intended
The
there
742
enti
area
the
for
is the
further to
200-700
The Access
The
instances
of
the
applicant
As bed
on
regards
3.2
Housing
and referred
to
sq.
be
the
realm,
should a1_qaUty
site
under
indicating
sq.
guidance
units
the
Notwithstanding
will
applicant
to
play
is stated
however,
site
high
applicant
are
the applicant
one
and
plus)
provided
of
m.
quality inefficient
ensure
scheme
m set
Statement
has
clarification
methodology
Play
be
to
some
on
an
development. sharing
hr/ha.
of to
vertical
private
number
S’s
which
policy
space
the
make
back
SPG.
out
has be
no
at
before
a
door urban
open
play
and
provision.
public on
the
has
that
of
the
the
prescriptive
single
number long,
is
in
given has
is
per
to
meets 3.4 The
provision
density
design
requested the
communal
space
Informal step
and delivering table
circulation
space demonstrated pre
scheme of
applicant
setting,
the
the the
also
further
child,
is
transport
convoluted
in
residential aspect
applicant same
child this,
within
undermines
application
sought.
play.
scheme
figure
Mayor.
the of
3.3
requirements
provision
sought
therefore
The
(public
as
with
units
it
accords Recreation’ for
yield and
as
clarification
landing
London of
set
to
a
north
landscaped
is is
Although
the
guidance
core
given
defined
the
220 high
accessibility
requested
under-S
noted provide
is
are
out proposes
per to
figures and cores
corridors,
that
Mayor’s
referred
proposed
stage,
and
London the
the
minimise
lacing
sq.m.
to
also
number
and
in core
Plan.
is
communal
that
set
London
all
the
the
by
being
density
residential
revisions
the
it
sets
a
is
child
dependant
which
the
garden at
the
is proposed
of full
a out
the
to
units
supplementary
needed
back
net Housing However,
on
Plan
to location
residential anticipated
level
the
a
playspace, of
within
residential single
confirm
delivered
residential breakdown
playspace in
benchmark
London the
which
residential
Plan
differ of
residential
which
lower to
the which
private)
are
located
(PTAL)
the
lower
quality.
as
the
aspect
the
dwelling
SPG
policy
on
of
required
Mayors
a
before
that
from to
proposal
levels
is
Plan
density high
this
Mayor
is
will
other
scheme
of
that
entrances
the
residential
provided
quality states in
will
between
in supported
of
of density.
planning
there
which cores,
3.6.
units
those
line
ensure Each
has
and
the
number
the
quantum
the
reaches there
10 sizes
be
Housing
factors
in
at
of
that
is
with
been
centre the
5q.m.
therefore
this
which
provided.
of
residential scheme are
stage
land the
at
set
seen
761
on-site.
are
are
five
will
that
the
guidance floors
least
applicant
the no
of
and
regard guidance
out
14
current
such shown
landing
of
of
legible in
habitable
SPG
of be
as
and
two. is
scheme
units
single
there
which
density
accordance
the
is this
in useable
also
130
the
broadly
approximately
(levels
has
as
As
referred
This
six
and the
density
before
within
will
proposals
layout
dedicated
impact
will
sq. ‘Shaping site
and
such
strongly states
aspect
should
a
set
(a)
is
is
paragraph
is
space
density
thresholds
rooms
too have
one
page
m
child
generally
be
which
compliant
visible
and out
the
the
the
should back
of
that
with
a on
high.
family
to
5
be
access. in
the
has (ow
show
per
the
from
22
at the Urban whilst 30 floor however,
residential along 31 emphasised, delivery however, solution relates
two. further
32 site. south unsafe 33
34 that strategic
35 element branding presence ensure
36 Inclusive compliance which
lift 37 stage 38 Plan inclusive, public that appropriate particular
of
the this
and the Access
As
that
to The Crispin design policy discussion accessible
route. Concern space The two, is The for
that The the
overall realm The there stated
The development and road. The stair is
concern. uses
supported
within
of
provide large
these supported.
however providing
provision features overall applicant
to materials
clarification key
the 3.8, with applicant access
scheme contributes for
applicant Road.
core drop—kerbs The
and
is and
the
In at
design
is
blank
an 5tud,os. entrances the servicing)
shutters, parking 7.2
is
addition raised Lifetime the
should applicant this.
landscaping and riverfront
The massing
opportunity need
detail and
including The design.
and will
and better will
proposed
pre
space will
has is
will Notwithstanding has
applicant
The
at
will in
good,
creation deliver in to spaces
/ is need
design consider application
not the
in the committed Homes this and
be is stated accordance
tactile supported. this of
the
legibility will
along be route
via this This
acknowledged
contrasting comprised
have the applicant entrance
to proposals design stage there
needed are
regard branding to
this which 10% need
of
regard has
of is that reconsider 5tandards
paving building has this create the
appropriate a a
a
route large
is carried in and wheelchair detrimental new stage,
unique to to
of
no
will the inclusion before with elevation
a
with However, relation
to
could is
this, secure achieving
of the large
within have of
activity an a
widow materials six
needed. is
building the be
is
clearer
studios,
London the the and
regards through not innovative out the
elevations
welcomed use the metre
3.6m the
consider
been residential amount
and this to
riverside overaH the of
the for required and amount accessible to
and design
or before impact
scheme
the Lifetime definition a The
wide, and
to river view the route,
designed the 1, overlooking public Plan detailing to small
a
planning
facility
define
2 public
full of
design
location running applicant design (where
external the simple scene
makes and the walk
on into studios. of
Policy circulation core as inactive
is
kiosk allowing view
realm,
units Homes frontage height
the
there referred
scheme
for 3 between
access pedestrian the
to of is
dock
along condition. solution
bed palette s
relevant)
no
a 3.8. assessment of strongly adjacent or
space London which the be generally
which
will
design rehearsal gradients
frontage
are In
attempt these of box standards
units. access
inclusive access
along of metal
creating this back is The used
need the
streets
the
proposed have
referred could office the will for
and firmly competition. and supported. units. route
listed scheme Council
This to different well for for southern
shutters to these (providing space studios to along be of which
been
the vehicle to the
create to
for a to demonstrate
servicing ‘hack include
ramps, located
thought is should indicate vibrant Bridge.
back all
the
generate
for
shutters Mayor all de5ign in
the should is designed presents
demonstrates
and
themselves
line is welcomed, uses. units house’ north edge the an
surfaces
to
ground clarification welcomed,
the on
In
be close
demonstrate design
underused, only.
the with the out
at
should residential
addition secure
site
proposed
of which
studios activity
and
stage
no how
to
Mayor and
to the
London page
and
be
and
the
the
6
at
that
48
ensure
street,
supplement
Street 47
46 car
Plan 45
Policy
residential
greater of
44 approach
Transport
should
met
contradicted pumps
43
pumps 42
but two
41
welcomed.
allow
40 connected
scheme
supplied
provide energy
39 emissions
Climate
comply
provision
the
park.
appropriate
Policy
by
is
and 135
monitored conformity
TfL
6.13
The
studio
The
The
future not
number
For be
the are
are
This
Paragraph
The
With
The
efficiency
The
taken
is Crisp is the
kW,
with
element.
accounted
from
application
the 6.13.
proposals are proposing the
provided proposals specified
CCHP seen
of
keen
in
to
change
applicant
provision
uses,
applicant
later lead
connection applicant
regards
gas
line
secured accessible
24
London maintenance
the
Road. purposes
of
in
a
through
again
with
to
single
on system.
tired
trips.
the
source
with
TfL
on
5.0.8 site
TfL measures
ensure
and
to
street involve
include for
to
to
London in
TfL Transport proposes
is has mitigation
has at
by
has,
Plan heat
CHP
the
request
has
provide
energy
install
the
the
supported on
of
the
seating
in
if
to
stage
of
condition.
requests If
investigated
requested
so, the
the the spaces.
followed
London
provided
page
policy
a will
heat heat
report network.
Combined, units
the travel
the
and
district
Plan
why
any
new
“be
assessing
that two, centre,
the
heating
occur.
Assessment
creation
within
provision
for pumps 32
37%
as
7.2
where renewable plan
Alternatively
the
Policy additional
and green”
Thames
Plan
creation
electric
the
of
the the
Overall the
a
clarification
heating
in
savings
commitment
Cycling located the
heating
the
the
Heat is
and
and
applicant
energy
are lead
requirement. site
this
the
of
6.9. CCHP
in
of tier
energy feasibility
studios.
212
vehicle
pathway
the
delivered cooling provided,
line
of
is
wide
regard.
implications and
heat
87
network
energy
off
from
should
acceptable. of
in
two and
hierarchy is
approach
an residential
with
parking
street the
the on
Power will
energy
proposed.
sources
strategy
additional additional
cooling charging
to
a
for
Such whether
will
technology
of
energy basement
London
combined
when
In
be
need
any should
ensuring
commercial
provision a
total,
(CHP),
spaces,
operate
permitted
of network.
and range
information
to
carbon for
In
report
cycle
loads
to
demand
the
The
car
hierarchy.
points
the
order
one
Plan the
10 is
cycle
9%
confirm
The
that and
of heat
cafe proposing
parking
split
for
parking
spaces
applicant
with
revisions
for
met
savings site
suggests become
savings
policy
renewable
to
through
The
spaces,
stands
in
will
applicant
the
the
exceeds staff
and and between
by fully
heat
line is
no
that
site
be
development. should
needed
development
is
the
spaces 6.9.
power restrictive residential
associated
of
will
with
available,
will
consistent
on to
should
understand
235
that
network.
which
all
this
heat
the
heat supply.
reduce energy
Queen is be
uses give
the
London
sq.
be
high proposing
in
plant,
link, for
studio
network achieved
appears pumps
clarify
studios
the
identified
m.
rise will
hours the
which
uses,
with
This
carbon
efficiency
technologies
and
Caroline
with
is
which
basement
the
Before
to
be
to
Plan
scheme
designed
page
if
can’t
will them
the will a
and
to
and London
from to
impacts is
heat
on 7
be will install
be the
be
heat
to to lighting 49
Queen station, this
50
measures n policy Plan 51 mechanisms and agreement.
Community
52 effect implement contribute London
53 the once and
amended 54 stat addition
55 Local scheme
56 Legal setting London) reasons application, Mayor direction unchanged, purpose
development
Construction
2010 and
ed.
Fulham
the
6.14.
Caroline TIL
on A
and
In to
The
The
again London At that planning
Under out travel considerations Delivery
is
or for
summary,
components 1
of regulations: be Order
by to recently
under
to the this towards
CCTV
April
tinancial Mayor
to Mayor
whether taking determining Council
5ecured
the the
in or was
be
under
Street secure
London plan the
stage Infrastructure
order
direct
borough 2008
2012, presented on Article
Mayors 2011
installed. Logistics and
granted
has
applied arrangements has
that the further
has the
authority’s Article
is
contributions,
he the through
at
that Servicing
works the
the
of £SOsq.m.
introduced regulations: http:/JJ1w,lggisIatipmgQy,uk/u_kthiL2OiDj9LSQ1
arranged and Plan, funding
7 been hire the view. considers
the the Council councils
CIL.
of Mayor
Council the planning
Plans
for In
information to
5
it junction
and network,
the
particularly application development
of
will submitted tine
the the
Mayor
permission
Unless Hammersmith
Plan
of
the
The should Order boroughs financial
is
set officers
be with
section are Council’s that a under
Levy
Crossrail.
required httjJwwwJegisiat[ortgpjLa1k/uksiL2OJ1j9SiLmasie
through position
permission
Order London-wide
should
paid out with required
may
notified also TfL
that London the
on
be
and
Article policies
in
have
on for obligations 106 requests Crisp
decide
able
if
into trip or
application secured
Article
planning he also
to the
it
shauld
commencement
a and
phase
CIL
otherwise agreement. subsequently
expressed is generation, provide
on to new Plan three
Road.
6 section
be
6.5 to
whether
Fulham should of introduce Community
or
4
a
through secured
act 27 thereof be
Policy
the of
and contribution
after committee charging
is
Due
complies
the
secured, space the
as
requested. 105
Order by
8.3.
be their
is
the to that
to
6.10,
local Town parking
the
by I have conditions CIL confirmed agreement. resolves
allow
the
the Cycle of The
local Infrastructure
support bands.
to
condition date.
Mayor,
with charges along
planning most in Thames
process
and themselves
increased
refuse
of
Mayoral
the November.
and
planning Hire Travel,
£157,000
to The the
The
Country new
with
draft
for by or the
cycling
make
which A Docking the
Pathway London in
of Mayors
authority
the the
rate 1 the development Construction
CIL
Delivery Council any demand l4923SDfconterLts. line
adopting
decision
application, Levy
authority
been
a section
applicant
scheme Planning formally
for to are
matters
draft necessary
with
Station
Plan,
deliver
(CIL)
CIL
signs Hammersmith
payable finalised.
must with
and
as
London
to decision
a 105 will
for and
and a to
with scheme. came
(Mayor
should proceed and Logistics
Servicing a in
or consult this result on
the
statement help
Greater the
in
his issue
council
page
See
Plan
into
on
of
he as
of
the
8
a the
020
020
Lucy
Justin
020
for CoHn
•
•
•
•
•
further
•
7983 •
below:
7983
the
with
7983
climate
choice,
58
Conclu5ion
57
106
Servicing
Financial
mechanisms Transport: Bird,
London the
Sustainable
all, accessible
Wilson,
Inclusive
an
In
undertake
Urban
space
Carr,
Children’s
regarding
is
need forward
need
3.12 the
the Housing:
Principle
London
5826
addition,
4895
4783 broadly
integral some to
agreement.
use
information,
Case
Riverside
Strategic
refurbishment
meet
change and London
There
of
to
to
is
Senior
of
Plan.
de5ign:
and Officer
the needed
of
email amend
is
email be
heat
access:
units
Plan.
residential
the some
in
considerations
part
acceptable to
London
these
The
Further
of
the
playspace:
independently are
Construction
London
development:
Manager
line
mitigation [email protected]
Plan
secure
Planning
contact
Studios applicants
pumps
development:
and
of applicant
The approach
no
The
the
for minor
with
policies
Further the
policies
financial
information Plan
of details
the
number
proposed
reasons
Plan,
works
Planning
quality),
- and
proposed
the London
in
is Manager
change5
Planning
scheme
Further
and
Policies
accepted.
strategic
density
will but
to
Logistics
information
heating/cooling the Riverside
on
of
assessed
and
considerations
of
deliver
transport
and
Decisions
The
need
not
how
density, principle
design The applicant
Plan
units
(Development
along
on
financial Decisions to
information design. 3.8
calculations the
applicant
yet
terms.
the
comply
trip principle
to Plans
policy
Notwithstanding
a
Studios
by
and
per
potential
with Unit:
is
100%
ensure Crispin
children’s
studio is
are
generation,
of
Hammersmith
generally
will
core. required
7.2. obligations
should
With
development,
3.4
others relevant
with
loads at
should
to
private is
need
and
Decisions)
that
Road
use
are
this
and acceptable
The
remedies
deliver
regards
London
be
play
clarification
for
requested. and
and
accepted;
as
to
the
stage.
table
provide
to
in
parking
residential
secured
housing
to the
submit
is
this,
space,
line on this public
Riverside and
enabling
requested.
the to
Plan
3.3
to
scheme housing
balance
with
in
residential
application.
in
Fuiham
further
location
issues
and
through however
respectively
appropriate
strategic
scheme
urban
order
realm
policy
of
density
comments
Studio residential
cycling
the
to
(affordable
does
of
to
clarification Council.
will
Travel,
design,
meet
3.6.
of applicants
non-compliance
to
conditions
the
quality,
satisfy
terms.
of the
not be
use
The
enable
matters
viability but
the applicant policy
made made
Delivery
wheelchair
development
yet
inclusive
is
application
The
polices
further
housing,
proposed
clearly
the
fully
refurbishment
with
approach
with
or 5.2
in inclu5ive
housing
work
applicant
this
the
will and
comply
of
regards
3.11
access,
defined
clarification
page
are
housing
the
which
section report.
need
scheme
complies
to
to
mix
set
9
for and
will
fund
with
play
to
to
as
out
will
put of