DOCSLIB.ORG

Typefaces for Dyslexia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Typefaces for Dyslexia Typefaces for dyslexia. Publishers often ask the British Dyslexia Association which font style dyslexic people prefer. Some dyslexic people have expressed strong feelings about fonts, but there is no agreement apart from saying it should be a sans serif font. This document and all are in Verdana. We asked dyslexia forum members. Only a few people responded. So it may not be a burning issue for most dyslexic people. It is likely that spacing is just as important. • 5 liked Comic Sans, (and one reported that members of a focus group preferred it), but 2 hated it. One of those said he was not bothered which font, as long as it was not Comic Sans. • 3 liked Century Gothic. • Lego and Sassoon, for which you have to pay, got 1 vote each. • No one favoured Arial, while 1 disliked it. Others have also criticised it. See below: Arial, Comic Sans, Century Gothic, Verdana, Trebuchet, Tahoma. See Research below: Comparison on Iansyst web. Sassoon, Barrington Stoke, Lexia Readable, Read Regular, Sylexiad. 1 The researchers below found that dyslexic people liked • Good ascenders and descenders, • Space between letters, • Rounded 'a' and 'g', although 'a' and 'o' may be confused, as in 'boat'. • Non-mirror image 'b' and 'd'. • Different forms for capital 'I' lowercase 'l' and digit '1', as in 'Ill'. It is simpler to keep to sans serif fonts that are in Microsoft Office, though none have all the good points above. You can pay for other fonts for printing or for PDF files, or use free downloadable ones. However MS Word would not retain them for circulation, unless the recipients also had them. The fonts shown here are in 12 point, yet the size, the letter spacing and the line spacing vary considerably. Arial. In the early days of home computers, we asked dyslexic people to choose between serif Times New Roman and sans serif Arial. They chose Arial. • The letters are close together, and would be better with expansion. • You can get more text on a page, but that makes it harder to read. • The 'n' and 'u', 'b' and 'd' are mirror images. • 'r' and 'n' together, as in 'turn', look like 'm'. Compare: boat, Ill, turn. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. It is possible to vary the character spacing in any font (or condense it, though this is not recommended). These are Arial expanded (or condensed) by one point. 2 Comic Sans. Comic Sans is the most popular Microsoft font for children. • It has a rounded 'a' and 'g'. • The capital I is well distinguished from lowercase l and digit 1. Compare: boat, Ill, turn. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. Century Gothic. • Century Gothic has rounded a and g. • It has short ascenders and descenders so people who rely on letter shapes might not like it. Compare: boat, Ill, turn. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. Verdana. • Verdana is much bigger, at the same 12 point. • The letters are well spaced, but the descenders are very short. Compare: Ill, boat, turn. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. 3 Trebuchet. • The ascenders and descenders have better proportions than other fonts. • It has a curly g, which is unusual in sans serif fonts. Compare: Ill, boat, turn. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. Tahoma. Tahoma is another viable sans serif font. Compare: Ill, turn, boat. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. Research: See Typefaces for Dyslexia in Iansyst web: The fonts below are not supplied by Microsoft. They all have a range of related fonts. You can buy Sassoon and Sylexiad. Lexia Readable is free. Sassoon. Rosemary Sassoon designed the Sassoon fonts for children, not necessarily dyslexic ones. Teachers like them. No one suggests them for adults. They are not free. They include rounded 'a' and 'g', and non- mirrored 'b' and 'd'. 4 "Overall, mainstream and special needs children chose letters with a slight slant, plain (sans serif) tops and exit strokes on the baseline. These help to clump the letters together into words. The added features were clear, open counters and slightly lengthened ascenders and descenders to accentuate the word shape." Barrington Stoke books: Patience Thomson, former head of Fairley House School for dyslexic pupils, was the co-founder of Barrington Stoke publishers. The company commissioned a specially designed font to expert guidelines, to encourage a smooth read. It is based on the natural style of handwriting. 5 Lexia Readable. Lexia Readable, is freely downloadable for Personal, School, College and Charity Use. It was designed for maximum legibility, an attempt to capture the strength and clarity of Comic Sans without the comic book associations. Features like the non-symmetrical b and d, and the handwritten forms of a and g may help dyslexic readers. Some people will object strongly to the unclosed b and p. Read Regular. Natascha Frensch, from the Netherlands, is dyslexic. She designed Read Regular while doing a master's degree at the London School of Art. The b and d are not mirror images. The a and g are rounded. 6 Sylexiad. Dr. Robert Hillier, a Senior Lecturer at Norwich University College of Arts designed 'Rob's Fonts'. "For the majority of dyslexic readers tested generous word spacing allied to the (light) weight and slightly condensed form (due to long ascenders and descenders) of the Sylexiad fonts were important. This would suggest that for subjects with reading difficulties it is the combination of spacing, weight and overall form of a typeface that is important rather than individual letterform design." Doctoral thesis 2007. 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cloud Fonts in Microsoft Office
    APRIL 2019 Guide to Cloud Fonts in Microsoft® Office 365® Cloud fonts are available to Office 365 subscribers on all platforms and devices. Documents that use cloud fonts will render correctly in Office 2019. Embed cloud fonts for use with older versions of Office. Reference article from Microsoft: Cloud fonts in Office DESIGN TO PRESENT Terberg Design, LLC Index MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS A B C D E Legend: Good choice for theme body fonts F G H I J Okay choice for theme body fonts Includes serif typefaces, K L M N O non-lining figures, and those missing italic and/or bold styles P R S T U Present with most older versions of Office, embedding not required V W Symbol fonts Language-specific fonts MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS Abadi NEW ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Abadi Extra Light ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Note: No italic or bold styles provided. Agency FB MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Agency FB Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Note: No italic style provided Algerian MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 01234567890 Note: Uppercase only. No other styles provided. Arial MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Italic ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Bold Italic ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
    [Show full text]
  • 15 the Effect of Font Type on Screen Readability by People with Dyslexia
    The Effect of Font Type on Screen Readability by People with Dyslexia LUZ RELLO and RICARDO BAEZA-YATES, Web Research Group, DTIC, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Around 10% of the people have dyslexia, a neurological disability that impairs a person’s ability to read and write. There is evidence that the presentation of the text has a significant effect on a text’s accessibility for people with dyslexia. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no experiments that objectively 15 measure the impact of the typeface (font) on screen reading performance. In this article, we present the first experiment that uses eye-tracking to measure the effect of typeface on reading speed. Using a mixed between-within subject design, 97 subjects (48 with dyslexia) read 12 texts with 12 different fonts. Font types have an impact on readability for people with and without dyslexia. For the tested fonts, sans serif , monospaced, and roman font styles significantly improved the reading performance over serif , proportional, and italic fonts. On the basis of our results, we recommend a set of more accessible fonts for people with and without dyslexia. Categories and Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: User Interfaces— Screen design, style guides; K.4.2 [Computers and Society]: Social Issues—Assistive technologies for per- sons with disabilities General Terms: Design, Experimentation, Human Factors Additional Key Words and Phrases: Dyslexia, learning disability, best practices, web accessibility, typeface, font, readability, legibility, eye-tracking ACM Reference Format: Luz Rello and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2016. The effect of font type on screen readability by people with Dyslexia.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    Born Broken: Fonts And Information Loss In Legacy Documents Geoffrey Brown and Kam Woods Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing Key Questions How pervasive are font substitution problems ? What information is available to identify fonts ? How well can we match the fonts required by a document collection ? How can we assist archivists in identifying serious font issues ? Page 8 MCTM Bulletin February 2005 K: I knew what you meant. I was just kidding. I’ll do XüLLbl (W):InputQ:FnOff :"""Y =! Y",Y#:PlotsOff the dishes tonight at dinner. YüL‚(W):Goto:0!Xscl:0!Yscl:Plot1(Scatt T er,L#,L$,&) PlotsOn 1:ZoomStat:StorePic Pic1 Lbl Q:FnOff :""üY :PlotsOff Jennifer felt better so offered the following challenge to Pause :Goto T Kevin. Lbl:0üXscl:0üYscl:Plot1(Scatt S:ClrHome:2!dim(L%er,L):dim(L ,L‚,Ñ)# )!N J: What type of general statement can you make DispPlotsOn "NO. 1:ZoomStat:StorePic OF Pic1 regarding the various polygons and, better yet, what PausePTS.":Output(1,13,N):Pause :Goto T can you say about a figure that looks like this? LblFor(I,1,N):ClrHome S:ClrHome:2üdim(Lƒ):dim(L )üN Disp "NO. "PT. OF NO.","":Output(1,9,I) PTS.":Output(1,13,N):Pause L#(I)!L%(1):L$(I)!L%(2) For(I,1,N):ClrHome Disp L%:Pause :End:Goto T LblDisp "PT.0:Menu(" NO.","":Output(1,9,I) MODELS R""," LINEAR (2)",1,"L(I)üLƒ(1):L‚(I)üLƒ(2) QUADRATIC",2," CUBIC/QUARTIC",3,"Disp Lƒ:Pause :End:Goto LOGARITHMIC",4," T LblEXPONENTIAL",5," 0:Menu(" MODELS POWER",6," RÜ"," LINEAR MAIN (2)",1," MENU",T) QUADRATIC",2," CUBIC/QUARTIC",3," Lbl 1:"aX+b"!Y# Kevin was impressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Performance Institute
    Vision Performance Institute Technical Report Individual character legibility James E. Sheedy, OD, PhD Yu-Chi Tai, PhD John Hayes, PhD The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence the legibility of individual characters. Previous work in our lab [2], including the first study in this sequence, has studied the relative legibility of fonts with different anti- aliasing techniques or other presentation medias, such as paper. These studies have tested the relative legibility of a set of characters configured with the tested conditions. However the relative legibility of individual characters within the character set has not been studied. While many factors seem to affect the legibility of a character (e.g., character typeface, character size, image contrast, character rendering, the type of presentation media, the amount of text presented, viewing distance, etc.), it is not clear what makes a character more legible when presenting in one way than in another. In addition, the importance of those different factors to the legibility of one character may not be held when the same set of factors was presented in another character. Some characters may be more legible in one typeface and others more legible in another typeface. What are the character features that affect legibility? For example, some characters have wider openings (e.g., the opening of “c” in Calibri is wider than the character “c” in Helvetica); some letter g’s have double bowls while some have single (e.g., “g” in Batang vs. “g” in Verdana); some have longer ascenders or descenders (e.g., “b” in Constantia vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Style Guide: Best Practices in Formatting
    Style Guide: Best Practices in Formatting According to Colin Wheildon, author of Type & Layout: Are You Communicating or Just Making Pretty Shapes, it’s possible that 75% of your readers attempting to access your content (whether online, in print, or via email) will disregard what you’re saying based solely on the type of font you choose. That’s right—75%! That’s why it’s critically important to choose fonts that are clean and accessible and to choose a layout that is visual but not busy. Don’t try to pack too much into your layout, or else you may run the risk of your message being lost. First, let’s look at the differences between a “serif” and “sans serif” font. Serif fonts are more embellished, with small lines attached to the end of a stroke in a letter or symbol. Popular serif fonts include Times New Roman, Georgia, and Garamond. Many books, newspaper, and magazines use a serif font. In print mediums, serif fonts are often easier to read. Sans serif fonts don’t have the added embellishments. These fonts are often used in advertisements, and are generally easier to read. In print, sans serif fonts are often used as a headline, whereas serif fonts are used for the body text. Popular sans serif fonts include Helvetica, Arial, and Calibri. There are some simple best practices in formatting print, online, and email communications for your organization. These best practices will make your information easier to understand and more accessible to the average reader. When do I use a serif font like Times New Roman or Garamond? For print items, it’s suggested to utilize serif fonts for brochures, donation letters in the mail, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fonts Installed with Each Windows OS
    FONTS INSTALLED WITH EACH WINDOWS OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS95 WINDOWS98 WINDOWS2000 WINDOWSXP WINDOWSVista WINDOWS7 Fonts New Fonts New Fonts New Fonts New Fonts New Fonts Arial Abadi MT Condensed Light Comic Sans MS Estrangelo Edessa Cambria Gabriola Arial Bold Aharoni Bold Comic Sans MS Bold Franklin Gothic Medium Calibri Segoe Print Arial Bold Italic Arial Black Georgia Franklin Gothic Med. Italic Candara Segoe Print Bold Georgia Bold Arial Italic Book Antiqua Gautami Consolas Segoe Script Georgia Bold Italic Courier Calisto MT Kartika Constantina Segoe Script Bold Georgia Italic Courier New Century Gothic Impact Latha Corbel Segoe UI Light Courier New Bold Century Gothic Bold Mangal Lucida Console Nyala Segoe UI Semibold Courier New Bold Italic Century Gothic Bold Italic Microsoft Sans Serif Lucida Sans Demibold Segoe UI Segoe UI Symbol Courier New Italic Century Gothic Italic Palatino Linotype Lucida Sans Demibold Italic Modern Comic San MS Palatino Linotype Bold Lucida Sans Unicode MS Sans Serif Comic San MS Bold Palatino Linotype Bld Italic Modern MS Serif Copperplate Gothic Bold Palatino Linotype Italic Mv Boli Roman Small Fonts Copperplate Gothic Light Plantagenet Cherokee Script Symbol Impact Raavi NOTE: Trebuchet MS The new Vista fonts are the Times New Roman Lucida Console Trebuchet MS Bold Script newer cleartype format Times New Roman Bold Lucida Handwriting Italic Trebuchet MS Bold Italic Shruti designed for the new Vista Times New Roman Italic Lucida Sans Italic Trebuchet MS Italic Sylfaen display technology. Microsoft Times
    [Show full text]
  • Does Font Type Has Effects on Web Text Readability?
    International Education Studies; Vol. 6, No. 3; 2013 ISSN 1913-9020 E-ISSN 1913-9039 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Reading on the Computer Screen: Does Font Type has Effects on Web Text Readability? Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali1, Rahani Wahid1, Khairulanuar Samsudin1 & Muhammad Zaffwan Idris1 1 Faculty of Art, Computing & Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia Correspondence: Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali, Faculty of Art, Computing & Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, 35900, Perak, Malaysia. Tel: 60-124-777-395. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 9, 2013 Accepted: January 18, 2013 Online Published: January 23, 2013 doi:10.5539/ies.v6n3p26 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n3p26 Abstract Reading on the World Wide Web has become a daily habit nowadays. This can be seen from the perspective of changes on readers’ tendency to be more interested in materials from the internet, than the printed media. Taking these developments into account, it is important for web-based instructional designers to choose the appropriate font, especially for long blocks of text, in order to enhance the level of students’ readability. Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the effects of serif and san serif font in the category of screen fonts and print fonts, in terms of Malay text readability on websites. For this purpose, four fonts were selected, namely Georgia (serif) and Verdana (san serif) for the first respondents and Times New Roman (serif) and Arial (san serif) for the second respondents. Georgia and Verdana were designed for computer screens display.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucida Sans the Quick Brown Fox Jumps Over a Lazy Dog
    Facing up to Fonts Richard Rutter “When the only font available is Times New Roman, the typographer must make the most of its virtues. The typography should be richly and superbly ordinary, so that attention is drawn to the quality of the composition, not the individual letterforms.” Elements of Typographic Style by Robert Bringhurst ≠ Times New Roman Times New Roman is a serif typeface commissioned by the British newspaper, The Times, in 1931, designed by Stanley Morison and Victor Lardent at the English branch of Monotype. It was commissioned after Morison had written an article criticizing The Times for being badly printed and typographically behind the times. Arial Arial is a sans-serif typeface designed in 1982 by Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders for Monotype Typography. Though nearly identical to Linotype Helvetica in both proportion and weight, the design of Arial is in fact a variation of Monotype Grotesque, and was designed for IBM’s laserxerographic printer. Georgia Georgia is a transitional serif typeface designed in 1993 by Matthew Carter and hinted by Tom Rickner for the Microsoft Corporation. It is designed for clarity on a computer monitor even at small sizes, partially due to a relatively large x-height. The typeface is named after a tabloid headline titled Alien heads found in Georgia. Verdana Verdana is a humanist sans-serif typeface designed by Matthew Carter for Microsoft Corporation, with hand-hinting done by Tom Rickner. Bearing similarities to humanist sans-serif typefaces such as Frutiger, Verdana was designed to be readable at small sizes on a computer screen. Trebuchet A humanist sans-serif typeface designed by Vincent Connare for the Microsoft Corporation in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Project Contentdm NEW COLLECTION Checklist University Libraries 3.26.12
    DIGITAL PROJECT CONTENTdm NEW COLLECTION CHECKLIST University Libraries 3.26.12 CONTENTdm ADMINISTRATION 1. Which template should be used to create the new collection? ________________________________________________ 2. What is the name of the new collection? __________________________________________________________________ 3. What should the collection alias? ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Should the collection be published? ______________________________________________________________________ 5. Enter the user name(s) of the person(s) for whom you want to grant access: ____________________________________ 6. Enter an IP address to grant access to: ___________________________________________________________________ 7. Collection information: _________________________________________________________________________________ 8. Convert multiple-page PDF files to compound objects? ______________________________________________________ Generate display images from full –resolution images? ________________________________________________________ 1. Display image format & settings: ________________________________________________________________________ __ a. JPEG2000 __ b. JPEG __ c. If JPEG2000, use lossy compression? ________________________________________________________________ __ d. If lossy compression is used, by compression ratio of (from 10:1 to 100:1) or by quality selection (minimum, medium, high or maximum)? ____________________________________________ 2. Advanced settings a. Tile
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Speed of Different Fonts in Young Ametropes
    © 2020 JETIR July 2020, Volume 7, Issue 7 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Reading Speed of Different Fonts in Young Ametropes 1Thoudam Bidyalaxmi, M.Optom, 2Prof. Monica Choudhury, 3Mousumi Saikia, M.Optom Abstract: This study has been carried out to compare reading speed and visual comfort of different font types in young Ametropes. Nowadays every work uses computer in one way or the other. There is no other study done before for Ametropia with fonts. Thus, it becomes a crucial to find out the best font type for Ametropes to read text on a computer screen. Several studies have found no significant differences in reading efficiency between the font types at any size. But there were, however, significant differences in reading time. In this prospective study, 6 font types (Times New Roman; Arial; Verdana; Georgia; Courier new; Comic sans MS;) were chosen. The sample size for this study is 60, with 43.3% being male and 56.7% being female. They were asked to read the given passages in 6 different font types. They were also asked to grade the font types according to their visual comfort. The data collected were then analyzed by comparing the reading speed of different font types between different types of Ametropia. Keywords: Ametropia, Emmetropia, Fonts, Verdana, Serif, Sans-Serif, Reading Speed. I. INTRODUCTION Nowadays text on computer screens consist of a mixture of both serif and sans serif fonts that were originallydesigned for computer use, as well as those that were made to use for print. Serif fonts are designed so that cross-strokes project from the main stroke of a letter, whereas sans serif fonts do not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Font Type and Spacing of Text for Online Readability and Performance
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5(2), 161-174 The Effects of Font Type and Spacing of Text for Online Readability and Performance Nafiseh Hojjati & Balakrishnan Muniandy Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia Abstract Texts are a group of letters which are printed or displayed in a particular style and size. In the course of the fast speed of technological development everywhere and expanding use of computer based instruction such as online courses, students spend more time on a computer screen than printed media. Texts have been the main element to convey messages. It has also been a significant component for learning. The main goal of this research is to measure the effects of font type and spacing of on screen text and its readability in improving and boosting the learner’s ability to read easily, recall information, and enhance their reading speed and comprehension from on screen text with different topics. The readability of text on screens is necessary to ensure effective engagement in order to enhance the level of students’ readability. For this purpose two font types were selected, Times New Roman (serif) and Verdana (san serif) for the respondents. Verdana was designed only for computer screens display. Readability test on a computer screen was conducted on 30 postgraduate students. Overall, the results showed that there was a significant difference between the readability of serif and san serif font type of on-screen display. The research findings suggest Verdana font type as a better choice in displaying long text for on-screen display. Keywords: Font type; Readability; Spacing; On-screen text; Serif; San serif Introduction Texts are a collection of letters and words which are printed or displayed in a particular style and size.
    [Show full text]
  • TTF Source Font Version Font Name Example Text Arial.Ttf Version 7.00 Arial Arial
    TTF Source Font version Font Name Example text arial.ttf Version 7.00 Arial Arial - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arial.ttf Version 6.98 Arial Arial - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arial.ttf Version 6.89 Arial Arial - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arialbd.ttf Version 7.00 Arial Bold Arial Bold - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arialbd.ttf Version 6.89 Arial Bold Arial Bold - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ ariali.ttf Version 7.00 Arial Italic Arial Italic - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ ariali.ttf Version 6.89 Arial Italic Arial Italic - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arialbi.ttf Version 7.00 Arial Bold Italic Arial Bold Italic - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arialbi.ttf Version 6.89 Arial Bold Italic Arial Bold Italic - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~ arial.ttf Version 5.22 Arial Arial - 0123456789 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ äöüÄÖÜß !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=?@[\]^_``{|}~
    [Show full text]