Epidemiology and Indices of Gingival and Periodontal Disease Dr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY/Copyright ° 1981 by The American Academy of Pedodontics Vol. 3, Special Issue Epidemiology and indices of gingival and periodontal disease Dr. Poulsen Sven Poulsen, Dr Odont Abstract Validity of an index indicates to what extent the This paper reviews some of the commonly used indices index measures what it is intended to measure. Deter- for measurement of gingivitis and periodontal disease. mination of validity is dependent on the availability Periodontal disease should be measured using loss of of a so-called validating criterion. attachment, not pocket depth. The reliability of several of Pocket depth may not reflect loss of periodontal the indices has been tested. Calibration and training of attachment as a sign of periodontal disease. This is be- examiners seems to be an absolute requirement for a cause gingival swelling will increase the distance from satisfactory inter-examiner reliability. Gingival and periodontal disease is much more severe in several the gingival margin to the bottom of the clinical populations in the Far East than in Europe and North pocket (pseudo-pockets). Thus, depth of the periodon- America, and gingivitis seems to increase with age resulting tal pocket may not be a valid measurement for perio- in loss of periodontal attachment in approximately 40% of dontal disease. 15-year-old children. Apart from the validity and reliability of an index, important factors such as the purpose of the study, Introduction the level of disease in the population, the conditions under which the examinations are going to be per- Epidemiological data form the basis for planning formed etc., will have to enter into choice of an index. and evaluation of dental care programs throughout Since these factors vary considerably from one study the world. When epidemiological data have been col- to another, no single index will be appropriate for all lected, the amount of disease found has to be quanti- types of studies. fied by using indices. It is the purpose of this paper to (1) review some of Measurement of Gingivitis the more commonly used indices for the study of gin- Four indices commonly used in recent studies on gival and periodontal disease, and (2) describe some of gingival inflammation in children and young adults the epidemiological trends in the natural history of are presented in Table 1. gingivitis and periodontal disease in children. The diagnostic criteria employed in three of these indices are described in Tables 2 to 4. In the index de- Selection of Indices scribed by Ainamo & Bay," only absence or presence of An index is a numerical value describing the rela- bleeding after gentle probing is recorded. tive status of the population on a scale with definite Both the index described by Lbe & Silness17 and the upper and lower limits'. The use of indices permits index described by Suomi & Barbano3 as modified by comparison between different populations classified Suomi,4 are based on a combination of criteria. As an by the same criteria and methods. example, score 1 in Suomi & Barbano's index (Table 4) A large number of gingival and periodontal indices is based on changes in color, volume, and texture, as have been described in the dental literature. In order well as presence or absence of stipling. to evaluate different indices it is important to esti- An example of an index which is based on only one mate two parameters: reliability and validity. symptom is the bleeding index used by Miihleman and Reliability is the ability of a given test to give the coworkers. The criteria for the Papillary Bleeding In- same result when applied twice to the same object. In dex5 are described in Table 4. As seen from this table, the case of gingival and periodontal indices, reliability bleeding is the only symptom which is recorded. An can be estimated by having an examiner examine the increasing score is assigned according to an increased same patient twice. tendency of the gingival tissue to bleed. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INDICES 82 Poulsen The index described by Ainamo & Bay,6 considers formed in the Scandinavian countries during recent only presence or absence of bleeding on gentle probing years. The diagnostic criteria -- bleeding or no bleed- of the gingival tissue. Thus, this index represents a ing w are assumed to be relatively easy to interpret. simplification of the index developed by Miihleman Therefore this index is assumed to be relatively and coworkers {Table 4). Whencompared to the index insensitive to examiner differences. described by LSe & Silness (Table 3), you can see that it represents score 2 and 3 in this index. The index de- Measurementsof Periodontal Disease scribed by Ainamo& Bay has proved to be useful in a Those indices described up to now only consider number of epidemiological and clinical trials per- gingival inflammation. Recording of loss of periodon- tal attachment is not included in any of them. The diagnostic criteria for the Periodontal Index Table1. Fourindices commonly used in recentstudies on gingival ~9 inflammationin children and young adults. (PI) developed by Russell, are based on gingival in- flammation and loss of periodontal attachment (Table 5). This index has been used mainly for epidemiologi- Name(abbreviation) Reference cal purposes, and a variety of different populations in developing countries have been examined using this Gingival Index (GI) ~ L~e& Silness 1963 index. Gingivitis Index Suomi & Barbano 19688 Suomi19684 Papillary Bleeding Index {PBI) Saxer & M~ihlemann19755 Gingival~ Bleeding Index (GBI) Ainamo& Bay 1976 Table4. Diagnosticcriteria for the PapillaryBleeding Index developed~ by Saxer& MiJhlemann. Table~,7 2. Diagnosticcriteria for theL~e & Silness gingival index. ScoreCriteria Score Criteria Nobleeding. Bleedingsome seconds after probing. Bleeding immediatelyafter probing. Normalgingiva. Bleeding on probing spreading towards the mar- Mild inflammation-- slight changein color, slight ginal gingiva. edema. Nobleeding on probing. Moderate inflammation -- redness, edema and glazing. Bleedingon probing. Severe inflammation -- marked redness and 8’~ edema. Tendencyto spontaneous bleeding. Ulcera- Table5. Diagnosticcriteria described byRussell. tion. Score Criteria Table3. Diagnosticcriteria for thegingival index developed by 3 6 0 Negative. There is neither overt inflammation in Suomi&Barbano andlater modifiedby Suomi. the investing tissues nor loss of function due to de- struction of supportingtissue. Score Criteria Mild gingivitis. There is an overt area of inflamma- tion in the free gingivae which does not circum- scribe the tooth. 0 Absenceof inflammation-- gingiva is pale pink in Gingivitis. Inflammationcompletely circumscribes color and firm in texture. Swelling is not evident the tooth, but there is no apparent break in the and stippling usually can be noted. epithelial attchment. Presence of inflammation-- a distinct color change Gingivitis with pocket formation. The epithelial at- to red or magentais evident. There maybe swell- tachment has been broken and there is a pocket ing, loss of stippling and the gingiva maybe spongy {not merelya deepenedgingival crevie due to swell- in texture. ing in the free gingivae). Thereis no interference Presence of severe inflammation-- a distinct color with normalmasticatory function, the tooth is firm changeto red or magentais evident. Swelling, loss in its socket, andhas not drifted. of stippling and a spongyconsistency can be noted. Advanceddestruction with loss of masticatory There is either gingival bleeding upon gentle prob- function. The tooth maysound dull on percussion ing with the side of an explorer or the inflamma- with a metallic instrument; maybe depressible in tion has spread to the attached gingiva. its socket. PEDIATRICDENTISTRY 83 Volume3, SpecialIssue When comparing the criteria proposed by Ram- Tablem] 6. Diagnosticcriteria described by Ramfjo~rd. fjord’°,’’ (Table 6) to the criteria developed by Russell we find that the criteria for score 1 and 2 are almost Score Criteria identical in the two indices. In those cases where no loss of attachment is recorded, Ramfjord’s Periodon- tal Disease Index (PDI) is equivalent to the gingivitis Absenceof signs of inflammation. score. If the gingival crevice extends apically to the Mild to moderate inflammatory gingival changes, cemento-enamel junction, the tooth is assigned a not extending around the tooth. Mild to moderately severe gingivitis extending all higher Periodontal Disease Index score and the gingi- around the tooth. vitis score for the same tooth is then disregarded. Severegingivitis characterized by marked redness, Both the index proposed by Russell and the index swelling,tendency to b]eedand ulceration. proposed by Ramfjord have criteria based on gingi- val inflammation as well as loss of periodontal scored as 1 decreased slightly, while the number of attachment. gingival units scored as 2 increased slightly from the Another possibility is to distinguish between gin- first examination to the second. Several explanations gival inflammation and periodontal disease and record gingivitis and loss of attachment separately. may be available for this phenomenon. The authors suggest that the first examination increased the tend- Whenrecording periodontal disease, a distinction should be made between pocket depth and loss of at- ency of the gingival units to bleed. Another explana- tachment;2 Pocket depth is the distance from the gin- tion may be a shift in diagnostic criteria. Probably gival margin to the bottom of the clinical pocket. both