DOCSLIB.ORG

C S a S S C C S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C S a S S C C S C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2007/043 Document de recherche 2007/043 Not to be cited without Ne pas citer sans permission of the authors * autorisation des auteurs * Conservation Status Report for Silver Rapport sur l’état de conservation de Lamprey (Ichthyomyzon unicuspis) in la lamproie argentée (Ichthyomyzon Canada unicuspis) au Canada Fraser B. Neave1, Gale A. Bravener1 and Nicholas E. Mandrak2 1 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sea Lamprey Control Centre, 1 Canal Drive, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 6W4 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6 * This series documents the scientific basis for the * La présente série documente les bases evaluation of fisheries resources in Canada. As scientifiques des évaluations des ressources such, it addresses the issues of the day in the halieutiques du Canada. Elle traite des time frames required and the documents it problèmes courants selon les échéanciers contains are not intended as definitive statements dictés. Les documents qu’elle contient ne on the subjects addressed but rather as progress doivent pas être considérés comme des énoncés reports on ongoing investigations. définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2007 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIÈRES ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... V RÉSUMÉ ............................................................................................................................. V 1. SPECIES INFORMATION............................................................................................... 1 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES ........................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Name and Classification .................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Morphological Description .............................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Genetic Description.......................................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Designatable Units ........................................................................................... 4 1.2 DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 Global Range..................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Canadian Range................................................................................................ 4 1.3 HABITAT CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Habitat Requirements....................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Habitat Trends................................................................................................... 7 1.3.3 Habitat Protection/ Ownership ........................................................................ 7 1.3.4 Identification of Critical Habitat....................................................................... 7 1.3.5 Studies Required to Identify Critical Habitat.................................................. 7 1.3.6 Identification of Residence.............................................................................. 7 1.4 BIOLOGY..................................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1 Life Cycle and Reproduction ........................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Predation ......................................................................................................... 10 1.4.3 Physiology....................................................................................................... 10 1.4.4 Dispersal/Migration ........................................................................................ 11 1.4.5 Interspecific Interactions ............................................................................... 11 1.4.6 Adaptability ..................................................................................................... 12 1.5 POPULATION SIZE, TRENDS, AND UNCERTAINTY......................................................... 13 1.5.1 Search Effort ................................................................................................... 13 1.5.2 Abundance ...................................................................................................... 14 1.5.3 Recent / Historical Trends ............................................................................. 15 1.5.4 Potential for Recovery.................................................................................... 18 1.5.5 Rescue Effect.................................................................................................. 18 1.6 SCOPE FOR HARM ..................................................................................................... 19 1.6.1 Present/recent species trajectory? ............................................................... 19 1.6.2 Present/recent species status?..................................................................... 19 1.6.3 Expected order of magnitude/target for recovery? ..................................... 19 1.6.4 Expected general time frame for recovery to the target? ........................... 19 1.6.5 Is there scope for harm/mortality to the species that will not impede recovery?.................................................................................................................. 19 1.6.6 What is the maximum harm/mortality that will not impede recovery? ...... 19 2. THREATS TO THE SPECIES....................................................................................... 19 2.1 LIMITING FACTORS AND THREATS .............................................................................. 19 2.1.1 List of threats.................................................................................................. 19 2.1.2 Degree of harm from each threat .................................................................. 21 iii 2.1.3 Aggregate total harm/mortality from threats and compare to allowable harm to determine what level of mitigation is needed ......................................... 21 2.2 ASSESSMENT OF CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITIES IN RELATION TO THREATS .... 21 2.3 EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF “PRINCIPAL STAKEHOLDERS” IN RELATION TO THREATS ... 21 3. EXISTING PROTECTION ............................................................................................. 22 3.1 LEGISLATION............................................................................................................. 22 3.2 EXISTING STATUS DESIGNATIONS (DOMESTICALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY) ................ 22 3.3 RECOVERY MEASURES CURRENTLY IN PLACE ........................................................... 22 4. POTENTIAL CONSERVATION TARGETS .................................................................. 22 4.1 GOAL OF CONSERVATION MEASURES ........................................................................ 22 4.2 PROPOSED SPECIES REBUILDING/HABITAT RESTORATION STRATEGY ........................ 22 4.3 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS/RECOVERY SCHEDULE....................................................... 23 4.4 OTHER STUDIES NEEDED........................................................................................... 23 5. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SPECIES .............................................................................. 23 5.1 SCIENTIFIC ................................................................................................................ 23 5.2 ECOLOGICAL............................................................................................................. 23 5.3 SOCIAL/CULTURAL .................................................................................................... 24 5.4 ABORIGINAL.............................................................................................................. 24 5.5 ECONOMIC ................................................................................................................ 24 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. 24 TECHNICAL SUMMARY................................................................................................... 25 RANGE OF OCCURRENCE IN CANADA: MANITOBA, ONTARIO AND QUEBEC ........................ 25 RANGE OF OCCURRENCE IN CANADA: GREAT LAKES, UPPER ST. LAWRENCE ECOLOGICAL AREA.............................................................................................................................. 26 RANGE OF OCCURRENCE IN CANADA: SASKATCHEWAN – NELSON ECOLOGICAL AREA ....
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LCSH Section L
    L (The sound) Formal languages La Boderie family (Not Subd Geog) [P235.5] Machine theory UF Boderie family BT Consonants L1 algebras La Bonte Creek (Wyo.) Phonetics UF Algebras, L1 UF LaBonte Creek (Wyo.) L.17 (Transport plane) BT Harmonic analysis BT Rivers—Wyoming USE Scylla (Transport plane) Locally compact groups La Bonte Station (Wyo.) L-29 (Training plane) L2TP (Computer network protocol) UF Camp Marshall (Wyo.) USE Delfin (Training plane) [TK5105.572] Labonte Station (Wyo.) L-98 (Whale) UF Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (Computer network BT Pony express stations—Wyoming USE Luna (Whale) protocol) Stagecoach stations—Wyoming L. A. Franco (Fictitious character) BT Computer network protocols La Borde Site (France) USE Franco, L. A. (Fictitious character) L98 (Whale) USE Borde Site (France) L.A.K. Reservoir (Wyo.) USE Luna (Whale) La Bourdonnaye family (Not Subd Geog) USE LAK Reservoir (Wyo.) LA 1 (La.) La Braña Region (Spain) L.A. Noire (Game) USE Louisiana Highway 1 (La.) USE Braña Region (Spain) UF Los Angeles Noire (Game) La-5 (Fighter plane) La Branche, Bayou (La.) BT Video games USE Lavochkin La-5 (Fighter plane) UF Bayou La Branche (La.) L.C.C. (Life cycle costing) La-7 (Fighter plane) Bayou Labranche (La.) USE Life cycle costing USE Lavochkin La-7 (Fighter plane) Labranche, Bayou (La.) L.C. Smith shotgun (Not Subd Geog) La Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 BT Bayous—Louisiana UF Smith shotgun USE Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 La Brea Avenue (Los Angeles, Calif.) BT Shotguns La Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) This heading is not valid for use as a geographic L Class (Destroyers : 1939-1948) (Not Subd Geog) USE Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lampreys of the St. Joseph River Drainage in Northern Indiana, with an Emphasis on the Chestnut Lamprey (Ichthyomyzon Castaneus)
    2015. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 124(1):26–31 DOI: LAMPREYS OF THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER DRAINAGE IN NORTHERN INDIANA, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE CHESTNUT LAMPREY (ICHTHYOMYZON CASTANEUS) Philip A. Cochran and Scott E. Malotka1: Biology Department, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, 700 Terrace Heights, Winona, MN 55987 USA Daragh Deegan: City of Elkhart Public Works and Utilities, Elkhart, IN 46516 USA ABSTRACT. This study was initiated in response to concern about parasitism by lampreys on trout in the Little Elkhart River of the St. Joseph River drainage in northern Indiana. Identification of 229 lampreys collected in the St. Joseph River drainage during 1998–2012 revealed 52 American brook lampreys (Lethenteron appendix), one northern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon fossor), 130 adult chestnut lampreys (I. castaneus), five possible adult silver lampreys (I. unicuspis), and 41 Ichthyomyzon ammocoetes. The brook lampreys are non-parasitic and do not feed as adults, so most if not all parasitism on fish in this system is due to chestnut lampreys. Electrofishing surveys in the Little Elkhart River in August 2013 indicated that attached chestnut lampreys and lamprey marks were most common on the larger fishes [trout (Salmonidae), suckers (Catostomidae), and carp (Cyprinidae)] at each of three sites. This is consistent with the known tendency for parasitic lampreys to select larger hosts. Trout in the Little Elkhart River may be more vulnerable to chestnut lamprey attacks because they are relatively large compared to alternative hosts such as suckers. Plots of chestnut lamprey total length versus date of capture revealed substantial variability on any given date.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamprey, Hagfish
    Agnatha - Lamprey, Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Super Class: Agnatha Hagfish Agnatha are jawless fish. Lampreys and hagfish are in this class. Members of the agnatha class are probably the earliest vertebrates. Scientists have found fossils of agnathan species from the late Cambrian Period that occurred 500 million years ago. Members of this class of fish don't have paired fins or a stomach. Adults and larvae have a notochord. A notochord is a flexible rod-like cord of cells that provides the main support for the body of an organism during its embryonic stage. A notochord is found in all chordates. Most agnathans have a skeleton made of cartilage and seven or more paired gill pockets. They have a light sensitive pineal eye. A pineal eye is a third eye in front of the pineal gland. Fertilization of eggs takes place outside the body. The lamprey looks like an eel, but it has a jawless sucking mouth that it attaches to a fish. It is a parasite and sucks tissue and fluids out of the fish it is attached to. The lamprey's mouth has a ring of cartilage that supports it and rows of horny teeth that it uses to latch on to a fish. Lampreys are found in temperate rivers and coastal seas and can range in size from 5 to 40 inches. Lampreys begin their lives as freshwater larvae. In the larval stage, lamprey usually are found on muddy river and lake bottoms where they filter feed on microorganisms. The larval stage can last as long as seven years! At the end of the larval state, the lamprey changes into an eel- like creature that swims and usually attaches itself to a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa
    Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa By Jun Cheng A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright Jun Cheng 2013 Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa Jun Cheng Masters of Science Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Area of Occupancy (AO) is a frequently used indicator to assess and inform designation of conservation status to wildlife species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The applicability of the current grid-based AO measurement on freshwater organisms has been questioned due to the restricted dimensionality of freshwater habitats. I investigated the extent to which AO influenced conservation status for freshwater taxa at a national level in Canada. I then used distribution data of 20 imperiled freshwater fish species of southwestern Ontario to (1) demonstrate biases produced by grid-based AO and (2) develop a biologically relevant AO index. My results showed grid-based AOs were sensitive to spatial scale, grid cell positioning, and number of records, and were subject to inconsistent decision making. Use of the biologically relevant AO changed conservation status for four freshwater fish species and may have important implications on the subsequent conservation practices. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank many people who have supported and helped me with the production of this Master’s thesis. First is to my supervisor, Dr. Donald Jackson, who was the person that inspired me to study aquatic ecology and conservation biology in the first place, despite my background in environmental toxicology.
    [Show full text]
  • Good-Lampreys-Hard-To-Find.Pdf
    G ood L ampreys A re H ard to F ind ~~~~~~~ by N eal D. Mundahl Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, [email protected] Illustrations © Joseph R. Tomelleri Most Minnesotans who know anything about lampreys Clandestine Life seem to hate them. But should we? Yes, I realize that the sea lamprey has wreaked havoc with fish in Lake Superior. All of Minnesota’s lampreys have similar life cycles. And yes, we’ve spent lots of money trying to control it Adult lampreys ascend streams to spawn from late April and deal with the consequences of its parasitic lifestyle. to mid-June, depending on locale and species. Awaiting But what about Minnesota’s “other” lampreys, our native the onset of spawning, lampreys hide beneath rocks or species. Are they just as bad? other objects in fast riffles. I once found an American Six species of lampreys live in Minnesota. Our five brook lamprey under a discarded oven door in the South native lampreys are much smaller and far less destructive Fork of the Zumbro River near Rochester. than their distant non-native cousin. Only two native Adults move out of riffles and just upstream to chestnut lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus species—the silver and the chestnut lamprey—share the spawning areas in loose groups. I’ve watched as many as sea lamprey’s behavior of preying on other fish, and they a dozen lampreys move out of hiding within a few minutes seldom have a noticeable effect on their prey populations. and begin to spawn. What stimulates them to begin their Our three other natives—American brook, northern spawning activities together remains a mystery.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Appendices
    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Biota
    Low Gradient, Cool, Headwaters and Creeks Macrogroup: Headwaters and Creeks Shawsheen River, © John Phelan Ecologist or State Fish Game Agency for more information about this habitat. This map is based on a model and has had little field-checking. Contact your State Natural Heritage Description: Cool, slow-moving, headwaters and creeks of low-moderate elevation flat, marshy settings. These small streams of moderate to low elevations occur on flats or very gentle slopes in watersheds less than 39 sq.mi in size. The cool slow-moving waters may have high turbidity and be somewhat poorly oxygenated. Instream habitats are dominated by glide-pool and ripple-dune systems with runs interspersed by pools and a few short or no distinct riffles. Bed materials are predominenly sands, silt, and only isolated amounts of gravel. These low-gradient streams may have high sinuosity but are usually only slightly entrenched with adjacent Source: 1:100k NHD+ (USGS 2006), >= 1 sq.mi. drainage area floodplain and riparian wetland ecosystems. Cool water State Distribution:CT, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, VA, temperatures in these streams means the fish community WV contains a higher proportion of cool and warm water species relative to coldwater species. Additional variation in the stream Total Habitat (mi): 16,579 biological community is associated with acidic, calcareous, and neutral geologic settings where the pH of the water will limit the % Conserved: 11.5 Unit = Acres of 100m Riparian Buffer distribution of certain macroinvertebrates, plants, and other aquatic biota. The habitat can be further subdivided into 1) State State Miles of Acres Acres Total Acres headwaters that drain watersheds less than 4 sq.mi, and have an Habitat % Habitat GAP 1 - 2 GAP 3 Unsecured average bankfull width of 16 feet or 2) Creeks that include larger NY 41 6830 94 325 4726 streams with watersheds up to 39 sq.mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Beamish's Contributions to Lamprey Research and Recent Advances in the Field
    Guelph Ichthyology Reviews, vol. 7 (2006) 1 Bill Beamish’s Contributions to Lamprey Research and Recent Advances in the Field This paper is based on an oral presentation given at a symposium honouring Bill Beamish and his contributions to fisheries science at the Canadian Conference for Fisheries Research, in Windsor, Ontario on January 7, 2005 Margaret F. Docker Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada Current Address: Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada (e-mail: [email protected]) Key Words: review, sex determination, statoliths, pheromones, reproductive endocrinology, phylogeny Guelph Ichthyology Reviews, vol. 7 (2006) 2 Synopsis Since his first lamprey paper in 1972, Bill Beamish has published more than 50 papers on numerous aspects of lamprey biology, reporting on several native lamprey species as well as the Great Lakes sea lamprey. Bill and his colleagues have contributed to our knowledge of the basic biology of larval lampreys (e.g., abundance, habitat, feeding, growth, and gonadogenesis), helped refine techniques to determine age in larvae (using statoliths, structures analogous to the teleost otolith), and studied the process of metamorphosis and the feeding and bioenergetics of juvenile (parasitic) lampreys. Current research continues to build on Bill’s contributions, and also makes many advances in novel directions. This exciting current research includes: the use of high-resolution ultrasound to study gonadogenesis and evaluate sex ratio in live larval lampreys; the elucidation of some of the exogenous and endogenous triggers of metamorphosis; examination of the neuroendocrine control of reproduction and the role of unconventional sex steroids in lampreys; the discovery of migratory and sex pheromones and their potential use in sea lamprey control; the use of molecular markers to study lamprey mating systems and phylogeny; and the renewed interest in the conservation of native lampreys.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Northern Hemisphere Lampreys (Petromyzonidae) and Their Distribution/ Liste Des Lamproies (Petromyzondidae) De L'hémisphère Nord Et Leur Distribution"
    40, Government of Canada Gouvernement du Canada Fisheries and Oceans Pêches et Océans Dru ïiireque list of floithern Illerniopheic tompreys (Pettornyzonidee) MOM and Their Distribution liste des lomptoku (Pettorngzonidne) de l'hémisphète nord et leut distribution %dim D. Vladykov Edward lion Miscellaneous Special Publication 42 Publication diverse spéciale ERRATUM "List of Northern Hemisphere Lampreys (Petromyzonidae) and Their Distribution/ Liste des lamproies (Petromyzondidae) de l'hémisphère nord et leur distribution" Page iii - In "List of Figures" : Legend for Fig. 10 and Fig. 11 should be interchanged. Pages 28-29 - Legend on p. 28 for Fig. 10 should be interchanged with legend on p. 29 for Fig. 11. COVER ILLUSTRATIONS - Enlarged discs of the three most destructive holarctic lampreys: Top, ILLUSTRATIONS DE LA COUVERTURE - Disques agrandis des trois lamproies holarctiques les plus Pacific type (Entosphenus similis); Center, Arctic type (Lethenteron japonicum); Bottom, destructrices : en haut, type du Pacifique (Entosphenus similis); au centre, type arctique Atlantic type (Petromyzon marinus). (Lethenteron japonicum); en bas, type atlantique (Petromyzon marinus). MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 42 PUBLICATION DIVERSE SPÉCIALE 42 List of Northern Hemisphere Lampreys Liste des lamproies (Petromyzonidae) (Petromyzonidae) and Their Distribution de l'hémisphère nord et leur distribution VADIM D. VLADYKOV VADIM D. VLADYKOV Department of Biology Département de biologie University of Ottawa Université d'Ottawa Ottawa, Ont, K1N6N5 Ottawa, Ont. KIN6N5 and et National Museum of Natural Sciences Musée national des sciences naturelles National Museums of Canada Musées nationaux du Canada Ottawa, Ont. K1A OM8 Ottawa, Ont. K1A OM8 EDWARD Korr EDWARD KOTT Department of Biology Département de biologie Wilfrid Laurier University Université Wilfrid Laurier Waterloo, Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • Jawless Fishes of the World
    Jawless Fishes of the World Jawless Fishes of the World: Volume 1 Edited by Alexei Orlov and Richard Beamish Jawless Fishes of the World: Volume 1 Edited by Alexei Orlov and Richard Beamish This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Alexei Orlov, Richard Beamish and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8582-7 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8582-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Preface ........................................................................................................ ix M. Docker Part 1: Evolution, Phylogeny, Diversity, and Taxonomy Chapter One ................................................................................................. 2 Molecular Evolution in the Lamprey Genomes and Its Relevance to the Timing of Whole Genome Duplications T. Manousaki, H. Qiu, M. Noro, F. Hildebrand, A. Meyer and S. Kuraku Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 17 Molecular Phylogeny and Speciation of East Asian Lampreys (genus Lethenteron) with reference to their Life-History Diversification Y. Yamazaki and
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Checklist of Canadian Freshwater Fishes
    PROVISIONAL CHECKLIST OF CANADIAN FRESHWATER FISHES Information Leaflet Department of Ichthyology and Herpetology Royal Ontario Museum July 1967 INTRODUCTION The following provisional list of Canadian freshwater fishes is not intended for publication but has been compiled as an aid in the preparation of a comprehensive text on Canadian freshwater fishes, being sponsored by the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Notice of the preparation of such a text was provided in a letter dis- tributed in the fall of 1966, and in which it was indicated that documents of this kind would appear from time to time, and would be circulated to those who indicated an interest in the project. This list includes 185 species in 25 families. For a number of species, changes in nomenclature have occurred since publication of a previous list by Scott (1958). Such changes are designated in the present list by the wording, "Formerly..." This list is in general accord with Special Publication No. 2 of the American Fisheries Society both in useage of the scientific and common names and in the order of families. For convenience species are listed in alphabetical order within the genus. At this stage, we have chosen to avoid including subspecific designations even when the two forms are known by distinct common names. This can be altered if it becomes apparent there is real merit in separating some forms into two entities. We earnestly solicit your criticisms on any and all aspects of this list. Simply write your criticisms directly on this list, adding additional sheets if necessary, and return it to us.
    [Show full text]