<<

arXiv:1308.3674v2 [astro-ph.HE] 15 Nov 2013 a neie ydrc bevtos,adse some de- the shed of and properties Gen- interesting observations), (so astrophysically test direct on regime to light by strong-field way al. dynamical unverified unique et the far a (Abadie in provide Gpc Relativity would few eral This a to to visible 2010). be up 900 will about Mpc, distances, systems to 400 binary cosmological visible BH about coalescing be of and will The distance Mpc, neutron binaries horizon (BH) inspiraling 2010). a hole see to NS-black to al. up able et (NSs) Harry be stars will 2008; detectors al. aLIGO et (Acernese erative ecnecudb eetda al s21 hnthe advanced- when observatories coa- 2015 GW binary as the compact early (aLIGO) of LIGO as a version detected from gen- advanced be signature next Indeed, could the GW lescence interferometers. by first laser detectable the ground-based frequen- potentially at of are (GWs) eration waves that gravitational cies of emission the a aainIsiuefrTertclAtohsc,Univers Astrophysics, Theoretical for Institute Canadian 2 1 olsec fcmatbnre sacmaidby accompanied is binaries compact of Coalescence rpittpstuigL using 2018 typeset 13, Preprint November version Draft LC OETIL YAIS RADW FTEOBTAEAEA AVERAGE ORBIT THE OF BREAKDOWN DYNAMICS: TRIPLE HOLE BLACK https://wwwcascina.virgo.infn.it/advirgo/ http://www.ligo.caltech.edu h vlto n lostebnr Wsga orahlreG freque GW large to reach binary to relat signal the before GW drive occurs binary can This the BH period. allows outer orbital and the binary’s evolution the to the of due fraction torque a the in cycle Kozai a o nlsso Wdtcosdt.Teecetdtcino l coa all of detection efficient q of The conventional banks if in data. missed template laser detectors be require based could GW therefore ground sources of of GW analysis band such for frequency of the fraction large in a chirp first they when ujc headings: Subject binarie X-ray po have supernovae, results Ia products. our type that including noting systems, by trophysical conclude We strategies. search fteessesi h iayi rie yteotrB nahgl inc highly a on BH outer the by orbited is GW binary doe than of the works, less source if distance previous observable systems an in become these adopted conditio might of treatment, the it average way investigate orbit the precision and secular and high triples binary perform BH BH induces we hierarchical the BH, paper of another this evolution resonan In typically term eccentricity. Kozai object, binary the distant n BH by third most inner gro initiated a of and are with generation brightest teraction merger the upcoming for the one by conditions be Favorable detectable to radiation, expected (GW) are wave (GCs) clusters lar etiiis eso ht30 that show We centricities. ilhv cetiiislre hn0 than larger eccentricities have will olsigbakhl B)bnre omn i yaia interactions dynamical via forming binaries (BH) hole black Coalescing b uraOsraoy nvriyo uk,V Turku, of University Observatory, Tuorla 1 1. n advanced-VIRGO and INTRODUCTION A T E tl mltajv 5/2/11 v. emulateapj style X MLCTOSFRGAIAINLWV DETECTIONS WAVE GRAVITATIONAL FOR IMPLICATIONS rvttoa ae iais-goua lses-sas kinematic stars: - clusters globular - binaries - waves Gravitational ∼ 0tmsteinrbnr eimjrai.Drn h iheccentricit high the During axis. semi-major binary inner the times 10 ai Antonini Fabio − 2 0 fcaecn Hbnre rvnb h oa ehns nGCs in mechanism Kozai the by driven binaries BH coalescing of 50% ilbcm op- become will E-mail: . rf eso oebr1,2018 13, November version Draft eccentric ,wt 0%o hmbigeteeyecnrc (1 eccentric, extremely being them of % 10 with 1, a omnMurray Norman , 5 H,Canada 3H8, M5S [email protected] nprlwvfrsfrmthdfitrn n dedicated and matched-filtering for waveforms inspiral Abstract i ed ti osbeta hyecetyform example efficiently for environ- they like stellar 1993) that dense possible Phinney in & (Sigurdsson is interactions ments dynamical it via field, tic 2007). a is al. systems et binary (Belczynski through isolated phenomenon pairs in rare stars BH massive close of of evolution con- formation calculations This that evolution stellar indicate 2007). of which results 1 on al. (about based rate et is total clusion O’Shaughnessy binaries the detections; to BH 10 contributor while small in a inspirals be binary will only NS field will predict galactic by often the dominated al. from models sources be et These GW Belczynski con- are 2007). of 1991; detections that poorly al. 1998; which et al. mostly and Kalogera et 2002; Narayan Yungelson assumptions models estimates & (e.g., Zwart of Portegies parameters Rate synthesis number model uncer- a strained population on highly 2010). based on remain al. rates et relay (Abadie coalescence tain binary pact 1992). (e.g., rate al. birth and et spins Abramovic masses, their like sources tected ais ¨ lhuhB iaismgtb aei h Galac- the in rare be might binaries BH Although com- for predictions astrophysical present, At t fTrno 0Gog t,Trno Ontario Toronto, St., George 60 Toronto, of ity al ¨ a ni 0 Piikki 20, antie ¨ ep Mikkola Seppo & ,otcltaset n hi merger their and transients optical s, o eibydsrb h dynamics the describe reliably not s eta plcto oavreyo as- of variety a to application tential vsi em eoeipratto important become terms ivistic ei hc h rvttoa in- gravitational the which in ce mru ore fgravitational of sources umerous efrmtr.Ti mle that implies This terferometers. n ae ae interferometers. laser based und ecn Hbnre nGswill GCs in binaries BH lescing aicrua epae r used are templates uasi-circular us-eidcvrain fthe of variations quasi-periodic sta edt h egn of merging the to lead that ns -oysmltoso h long the of simulations 3-body xrml ag eccentricities large extremely ie ri ihaperiapsis a with orbit lined ce ( ncies aito.W n htthe that find We radiation. ntednecr fglobu- of core dense the in I250 Finland FI-21500, o ¨ b & POIAINAND PPROXIMATION 0H)a ihec- high at Hz) 10 n dynamics and s − e hs of phase y ) . 10 − 5 , 2 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola galactic nuclei (Miller & Lauburg 2009) and globular code combines the use of the chain regularization method clusters (GCs) (O’Leary et al. 2006; Downing et al. of Mikkola & Aarseth (1993) and the time transformed 2010, 2011; Banerjee et al. 2010). In these dense stel- leapfrog scheme to avoid singularities. This allows for an lar systems, otherwise rare dynamical processes can take essentially exact treatment of the dynamics avoiding the place and affect the dynamical evolution of the BH pop- approximations that are made when using the orbit av- ulation. Due to dynamical friction BHs tend to seg- erage treatment, at expense, of course, of computational regate (Spitzer 1987) toward the core of the cluster, efficiency. The employment of an N body integrator is or galaxy, where dynamical interactions with stars and motivated by a recent study of Antonini− & Perets (2012) other BHs will lead to the formation, hardening and who have shown, in the context of BH binary mergers in (in some cases) ejection of BH binaries (Heggie 1975) galactic nuclei, that the orbit averaged approximation before they can efficiently inspiral and coalesce in re- breaks down for highly inclined but stable configurations sponse to gravitational radiation. The merger rate for if the binary comes closer to the outer perturber than these binaries, although uncertain, could be as large as a certain distance (see 4.1 of Antonini & Perets 2012, a few thousand events a year for aLIGO and be com- or Katz & Dong 2013 and§ Seto 2013 for an application parable or even greater than the event rate for NS bi- of this in the context of white dwarf-white dwarf and nary mergers (e.g., Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2000; NS-NS collisions respectively). Sadowski et al. 2008; Downing et al. 2011). In this work we investigate the dynamics of coa- Since stellar BH binaries are not directly detected, de- lescing BH binaries driven by the Kozai mechanism tailed modeling of their formation processes and dynam- and focus on their eccentricity distribution when the ical evolution is crucial for making predictions about GW signal reaches frequencies that will be detectable their characteristic GW-form and in turn for enabling by the next generation of ground-based laser inter- efficient detection with future GW observatories. It was ferometers. Similar analysis were previously con- first noted by Miller & Hamilton (2002a) that binary- ducted by Miller & Hamilton (2002a), Wen (2003) and binary encounters play a decisive role in initiating fa- O’Leary et al. (2006). These previous papers employed vorable conditions for BH binary coalescence in GCs. A the standard orbit average approximation, which we large fraction, roughly 20 50%, of these encounters leave demonstrate to be inaccurate in describing the dy- behind a stable hierarchical− (BH) triple system (e.g., namics of such systems even when including octupole Sigurdsson & Hernquist 1993; Kulkarni et al. 1993). order terms in the evolution. Our N body experi- If the orbital plane of the inner binary is strongly ments reveal that inspiraling BH binaries− often reach the tilted with respect to the orbital plane of the outer gravitational-radiation-dominated regime while on orbits object the secular Kozai mechanism can lead the in- that are still very eccentric; eccentricities can be large ner binary orbit to very high eccentricities (Kozai 1962; enough that detecting the GW signal from these sources Lidov 1962). In turn, given that the timescale associ- will require the use of eccentric templates for data anal- ated with GW radiation is a strong function of eccen- ysis and dedicated search strategies (East et al. 2013). tricity (Peters 1964), a combination of Kozai cycles and In 2 we review the concepts behind the classic Kozai GW energy loss can enormously accelerate the merger of secular§ theory for the evolution of hierarchical triples a compact binary (e.g., Blaes et al. 2002). A quite con- noting the simplifying approximations that are made in vincing demonstration of the importance of the Kozai this treatment. In 3 we show that the standard orbit mechanism in determining the conditions for BH bi- average approximation§ breaks down if the inner binary nary mergers in stellar clusters was recently provided by is orbited by an outer perturber with a moderate peri- Aarseth (2012) who made use of a hybrid N body code , and determine an approximate condition for this incorporating the algorithmic regularization− method of to occur. In 4 we make use of direct numerical three- Hellstr¨om & Mikkola (2010) and post-Newtonian forces body integrations§ to study the dynamics of hierarchical to evolve GC models containing BHs and NSs. Aarseth BH triples in GCs and focus on the evolution of the in- finds that the onset of conditions for GW radiation is ner BH binary into a short period orbit and the way in usually initiated by the Kozai mechanism. which it may become an observable GW source for the A number of papers have considered the Kozai res- advanced GW detectors. We discuss and summarize our onance as a mechanism for accelerating compact ob- results in 5. § ject mergers in triple systems (e.g., Blaes et al. 2002; 2. Miller & Hamilton 2002a; Wen 2003; Thompson 2011; ORBIT AVERAGED EQUATIONS Prodan et al. 2013a). These authors dealt with the We consider stellar BH binaries with components of problem by averaging over orbital phases, i.e., averaging masses m0 and m1 orbiting a third body of mass m2. the over the short timescales asso- We denote the eccentricities of the inner and outer orbits, ciated with the unperturbed Keplerian motions of both respectively, as e1 and e2, and semi-major axes a1 and inner and outer orbit. The result is a set of first-order a2. We define ω1 as the of the differential equations that describe the long-term (secu- inner binary relative to the line of the descending node, lar) evolution of the remaining due to ω2 as the argument of periapsis of the outer orbit, and I the perturbing forces (Merritt 2013). as the mutual of the inner orbit with In this paper we perform direct integrations of the respect to the outer orbit. post-Newtonian equations of motion describing triple If the distance of the outer BH is much larger than systems. We do this by using the AR-CHAIN code which the semi-major axis of the inner binary the dynamics is able to trace the motion of tight binaries with arbi- of the entire system can be described as the interaction trary mass ratio for long periods of time with extremely between an inner binary of point masses m0 and m1 and high precision (Mikkola & Merritt 2006, 2008). The an external binary of masses Mb = m0 +m1 and m2. We Triple Dynamics 3 define the angular momenta L1 and L2 of the inner and where H L L 2 outer binary and total angular momentum = 1 + 2: Gm m m a K = 0 1 2 1 (9) 1/2 2 3/2 2 16Mba2(1 e2) a2 Ga1 1 e −   L = m m − 1 , (1) 1 0 1 M and " b # H2 L2 L2 cos I = − 1 − 2 . (10) and 2L1L2 1/2 2 Ga2 1 e2 Equations (5)-(8) can be considered as describing the L2 = Mb m2 − , (2) interaction between two weighted wires instead of point Mb + m2 " # masses in orbits. Generally, these equations are ap- with G the gravitational constant. We define the dimen- plied to the dynamics of triple systems that satisfy sionless angular momenta ℓ1 = L1/L1,c and ℓ2 = L2/L2,c the stability criterion (e.g., Blaes et al. 2002; Wen 2003; Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007; Hamers et al. 2013): with L = L / 1 e2 the angular momentum of a cir- i,c i − i cular orbit with the same ai. 2/5 p a 3.3 2 m 1+ e When changes in the orbital properties of a three-body 2 > 1+ 2 2 (11) system occur on a timescale longer than both the inner 1/2 a1 1 e2 "3 Mb (1 e2) # binary and the outer tertiary orbital periods, it is con- −   − (1 0.3I/π) , venient to average the motion over both these periods. × − The resulting double average Hamiltonian of the system which was derived in Mardling & Aarseth (2001) by is = kW with k = 3Gm m m a2/8M a (1 e2)1/2 H 0 1 2 1 1 2 − 2 means of Newtonian direct N body simulations. Sys- and (Miller & Hamilton 2002a) tems that satisfy this criterion− are stable hierarchical 2 2 2 systems, meaning that the semi-major axis of the in- W (ω1,e1)= 2(1 e1)+(1 e1)cos I (3) ner binary is constant on a secular timescale, in contrast − − − χ +5e sin2ω (cos2I 1)+ , to unstable systems that experience chaotic energy ex- 1 1 2 − 1 e1 change which inevitably leads to the escape of one body − over a short timescale. with p The binary starts from initial eccentricity e1(0), semi- 3 major axis a (0), argument of periapsis ω (0) and mu- 8M a (1 e2) GM 1 1 χ = b 2 − 2 b (4) tual inclination I(0) and evolves through interaction with m a a c2 2  1  1 the third body to a maximum eccentricity emax and critical ωcrit and Icrit. For initially small inclinations, and c the speed of light. 2 2 The quadrupole-level secular perturbation equations 60cos I(0) χ , relativistic terms can be ignored and ≫ 2 1/2 can be easily derived from the conserved Hamiltonian (3). one finds emax = 1 (5/3)cos I(0) (Innanen et al. The resulting evolution equation of the inner binary or- 1997). High initial inclinations− will instead result in large   bital elements, including Schwarzschild precession (SP) values of emax for which relativistic terms become rele- and quadrupole gravitational wave radiation terms, are vant, for instance by limiting the maximum eccentricity (Ford et al. 2000; Peters 1964): attainable by the inner binary orbit. The influence of relativistic processes on the dynamical evolution of the BH triple are briefly discussed in what follows. de1 30K 2 2 = e1 1 e1 1 cos I sin 2ω1 dt L1,c − − 2.1. The role of relativistic effects q3  304G m0m1Mbe1 121 2 If the inner binary precesses “quickly”, i.e., in a 1+ e1 , (5) − 5 4 2 5/2 304 timescale short compared with the time for changes in 15c a1 (1 e1)   − L1, the resulting, averaged equations of motion will no longer contain ω1, and so they will conserve the momen- dω1 6K 1 = 4cos2 I + tum conjugate to ω1, which is L1. This simple argu- 2 dt L1,c 1 e1 ment indicates that any mechanism inducing rapid apsi-  − h dal precession, e.g., SP for an eccentric orbit, will sup- 2 2 (5cos 2pω1 1)(1 e cos I) (6) press the Kozai resonance. However, if the relativistic − − 1 − precession timescales are comparable or lower than the L cos I i χ + 1,c 2+ e2(3 5cos 2ω ) + , secular Newtonian timescales, then around some critical L 1 − 1 1 e2 2 − 1 value of a2 it is possible that the maximum achievable    3 eccentricity is increased with respect to the Newtonian da1 64G m0m1Mb 73 2 37 4 case (Ford et al. 2000; Naoz et al. 2013). = − 5 3 2 7/2 1+ e1 + e1 , (7) dt 5c a1(1 e1) 24 96 For highly eccentric orbits, the SP (whose associated −   −1 rate diverges as (1 e1) ) sets a lower bound, ℓSP, to the angular momentum− attainable by the inner binary dH 32G3m2m2 GM 1/2 = 0 1 b (8) orbit. The minimum angular momentum allowed can dt −5c5a3(1 e2)2 a then be obtained from the quadrupole-order equations 1 − 1  1  7 L + L cos I of motion (5)-(8) by setting de1/dt = 0 and from con- 1+ e2 1 2 , servation of W (ω ,e ) (e.g., Miller & Hamilton 2002a). 8 1 H 1 1   4 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola

− 1/2 −1/6 If we ignore energy loss due to GW emission, in the re- Mb a1 stricted three body problem (i.e., m m m ), one . 0 ≫ 1 ≫ 2 × 20M⊙ 1AU finds (Miller & Hamilton 2002a; Wen 2003):     By additionally requiring the triple system to be sta- χ 2 ble, Equations (11) and (16) imply that the range of ℓ 1 , (12) SP ≈ − 9 initial conditions that would allow a BH binary to enter r   the aLIGO frequency band while on a high eccentric or- where e 1, high initial inclination (I(0) π/2), and bit is quite small. For instance, for the compact-object 1 ≈ ≈ weak precession (χ 3) have been assumed. masses considered here, setting a1 =0.3 AU and e2 0, The importance of≪ SP to the evolution of the inner bi- highly eccentric GW sources can only be produced∼ for nary orbit depends on the role of GW emission which 2.8 . a2/a1 . 4. However, as we demonstrate in the might dominate the evolution before ℓSP is reached. next section, such a result is an artifact of the double- From Equation (5), by setting de/dt = 0 and neglecting average approximation which is shown to break down for angular terms, we find that the critical angular momen- a2(1 e2)/a1 . 10, i.e., well above the stability boundary tum below which GW energy loss dominates the evolu- implied− by Equation (11). In fact, we find that in this tion is approximately: region of parameter space, the system evolves through a complex dynamical evolution which can lead to arbitrar- G3m m M L 1/6 ily large eccentricities before the fast orbital circulariza- ℓ 0 1 b 1,c . (13) GW ≈ c5a4 K tion due to GW loss begins. Our calculations predict that  1  at least a few percent of BH binaries will have extremely Transition between Kozai dynamics and GW driven in- high eccentricities while entering the aLIGO band. spiral occurs at 3. DIRECT NUMERICAL INTEGRATIONS ℓ1 = ℓGW. (14) 3.1. Numerical method For ℓGW < ℓ1, the inner binary “decouples” from the third body, and inspirals approximately as an isolated We tested the applicability of the orbit-averaged ap- system. If ℓGW >ℓSP, GW radiation reaction will dom- proach for the study of GW sources by comparing the inate the evolution within one Kozai cycle and the SP results of the orbit-averaged equations of motion (in both will be unimportant. In the (quadrupole-level) orbit av- their quadrupole and octupole level form4 ), with those erage approximation this is a necessary condition for the from numerical three-body integrations having the same binary to maintain a finite eccentricity as its GW fre- initial conditions (and arbitrary orbital phases). The quency evolves through the aLIGO band. triple dynamics was followed until the inner binary GW Given the rapid orbital circularization due to GW signal reached the lower end of the aLIGO frequency emission we would expect e1 to be typically small as the band, which we identify here with the moment at which binary GW frequency passes through the high frequency the binary peak GW frequency reaches the 10 Hz fre- band of ground based interferometers. On the other quency. hand, it is possible that the binary GW frequency crosses We used the high accuracy N body integrator AR- L CHAIN (Mikkola & Merritt 2008),− which includes post- the lower end of the aLIGO frequency band, fGW = 10 Hz, before GW radiation dominates the evolution, Newtonian (PN) non-dissipative 1PN, 2PN and dissi- which will allow the eccentricity to be large ( emax) pative 2.5PN corrections to all pair-forces. The code at such high frequencies 3. Such situation occurs∼ only employs an algorithmically regularized chain structure L L and the time-transformed leapfrog scheme to accurately if ℓ(fGW) > ℓGW, with ℓ(fGW) the binary angular mo- mentum corresponding to the detector characteristic fre- trace the motion of tight binaries with arbitrarily large quency and initial binary semi-major axis a1(0). mass ratios. This permits an essentially exact (at the Eccentric binaries emit a GW signal with a broad spec- PN level) treatment of the interplay between Newtonian trum of frequencies; the peak gravitational wave fre- and relativistic perturbations to the motion, avoiding quency corresponding to the harmonic which leads to the the approximations that are made when using the or- maximal emission of GW radiation can be approximated bit average equations of motion. We refer the reader as (Wen 2003) to Mikkola & Merritt (2006) and Mikkola & Merritt (2008) for a more detailed description of AR-CHAIN. 1.1954 √GMb (1 + e1) Since following the inspiral of the binary all the way fGW = 1.5 . (15) down to the aLIGO band is not practical with AR- π [a (1 e2)] 1 − 1 CHAIN, we stopped integrating the triple once the bi- Under the quadrupole approximation the condition for nary orbital separation had shrunk (because of GW en- −2 5 the system to be able to pass through the detector fre- ergy loss) to about 10 a1(0). At this point the × quency band before GW radiation dominates is 4 We integrated the equations of motion of Blaes et al. (2002) 5 1/3 −1/6 by using a 7/8 order Runge-Kutta algorithm with a variable time- a2ℓ2 2 c m2Mb a1 step (Fehlberg 1968) in order to keep the relative error per step in < (16) 8 L 2 1/2 − a1 5 (πf ) m0m1 energy, in the absence of GW energy loss, less than 10 . When  GW  (GMb) GW radiation was included, we checked the integration accuracy −2/3 1 m M 1/3 f L through the quantity E + EGW with E the energy per unit mass =3.3 2 b GW and EGW the work done by GW radiation along the trajectory. 2 m0m1 10Hz The accuracy in this case was of the same order of that found in     integrations without dissipative terms. 3 http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/advLIGO/scripts/summary.shtml 5 The semi-major axis and eccentricity were calculated from Black Hole Triple Dynamics 5 binary dynamics is dominated by GW radiation and the influence of the third body can be safely neglected, so we continued evolving the binary eccentricity and semi- major axis by using the leading order orbit average ana- lytical formulas of Peters (1964). This allowed for a more efficient computation of the dynamical evolution of the system.

3.2. Breakdown of the orbit average approximation We begin by studying the eccentricity of the inner bi- nary at the time its GW signal first enters the aLIGO frequency band, i.e. fGW = 10 Hz, for a set of illus- trative systems that are close to the stability criterion given by Equation (11) and for which the initial mutual inclination is large. It is from these marginally hierarchi- cal configurations that we expect the larger number of eccentric sources for aLIGO, as well as the larger dis- crepancy between the results of N body integrations and the predictions of the orbit average− equations of mo- tion (Antonini & Perets 2012). Two sets of initial conditions are explored in Figure 1. In the upper panel we set m0 = m1 = m2 = 5 M⊙. In the secular theory the octupole order terms go to zero for m0 = m1, and we are therefore left with the contribution from the quadrupole order terms only, i.e., Equations (5)- (8). Systems that are unstable according to Equation (11) (hatched region in Figure 1) experience the ejection of one component before the inner binary can complete one Kozai cycle and possibly merge. An example of such sys- tems is the first point on the left in the upper panel of Figure 1, which is the same system shown in Figure 4 Fig. 1.— The eccentricity at the moment the inner BH binary of Wen (2003). As Wen noted, such a system would en- enters the sensitivity window of planned ground-based interferom- ter the aLIGO band with a large eccentricity, e1 0.9. eters as a function of the periapsis distance of the outer body, This occurs because GW radiation dominates within≈ one a2(1 − e2). Inside the hatched regions triple systems are unstable according to Equation (11); our N−body experiments verify the Kozai cycle and SP is negligible. In reality, such initial accuracy of this stability criterion. In these integrations we fixed conditions correspond to a highly unstable system and the initial inner and outer orbit semi-major axes, while we dis- no merger occurs when the system is evolved in time by tributed the external orbit eccentricity uniformly within the range using the direct integrator. In fact, according to Equa- e2 = (0.51, 0.01), corresponding to the interval of periapsis dis- tances a2(1 − e2)/a1(0) = (2.45, 4.95)AU. We randomly chose the tion (16), the quadrupole level secular equations of mo- ◦ initial true anomalies, set ω1 = ω2 = 0 and I = 99 . In the tion should, and our numerical integrations show that upper panel, we set a1 = 2 AU, a2 = 5 × a1. Since the inner bi- they do, result in a very small residual eccentricity for nary components in these systems have equal masses the octupole all stable configurations. In contrast the results of the order terms in the secular equations of motion go to zero. The cor- responding results from the secular code provide a poor match to direct 3-body calculations give large residual eccentrici- the results of the 3-body integrations, which systematically predict ties; a few binaries enter the aLIGO band with extremely higher residual eccentricities. In the lower panel we set a1 = 0.2 AU large eccentricities, e1 & 0.9. and a2 = 5 × a1. In these integrations m0 =6 m1 , thus leading to We investigate the importance of the octupole level a non-zero contribution of the octupole order terms. The results of the secular theory in this case are in better agreement with the terms in the lower panel of Figure 1 where we set m0 = results of the 3-body integrations. However, while in the N−body 8 M⊙, m1 = 12M⊙ and m2 = 10M⊙. In this case there runs a large fraction of binaries are exremely eccentric (e1 & 0.9) is a non zero octupole order perturbation which changes when the first enter the aLIGO band, the residual eccentricity of the rate of precession slightly, and causes variation in the such binaries is substantially smaller (e1 ∼ 0.1) when the same initial conditions are evolved using the orbit average equations of outer perturber . motion (even when high order terms are included). Evidently, the When expanded to the quadrupole order only, the av- standard secular theory fails in describing the dynamical evolution eraged perturbing potential is axisymmetric (even for an of these systems. eccentric external orbit, e.g., Katz et al. 2011). A di- rect consequence of this is that the magnitude of the inner orbit’s angular momentum has a well defined lower order the Hamiltonian describes a dynamical system of bound which under the test particle approximation is two degrees of freedom. Motion in this case differs in simply the Kozai constant, i.e. ℓ ℓ = 1 e2 cos(I), three important ways from motion in the (axisymmetric) 1 ≤ z − 1 quadrupole order potential. First, the lack of rotational with z chosen along the direction of L2. At the octupole p symmetry implies that no component of the binary an- the particle positions and velocities by adopting the relative gular momentum is conserved. As a consequence of this radial expressions given in Equations (3.6 a) and (3.6 b) of the eccentricity of the inner orbit can reach much higher Damour & Deruelle (1985). values near the maximum of a Kozai cycle (Ford et al. 6 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola

Fig. 2.— Illustrating the region of parameter space within which highly eccentric GW sources can be produced. The solid line gives the value of the critical eccentricity defined in Equation (18) as a function of the periapsis distance of the outer BH orbit expressed in units of a1 and assuming Mb = 2m2. Below this line a binary can reach e1 ∼ 1 in a fraction of its orbital period. The gray solid area corresponds to unstable configurations according to Equation (11) ◦ where we set e2 = 0 and I = 90 . Dashed lines enclose the region of parameter space within which GW radiation reaction dominates the evolution. These lines were computed using the approximate Equation (13) with e2 = 0, m0 = m1 = m2 = 10M⊙ and a1 = 0.1 and 1 AU. Within the dot-dashed lines the binary peak GW frequency becomes larger than 10 Hz. Highly eccentric GW sources are produced by stable-moderately hierarchical triples with 3 . Fig. 3.— Kozai-driven evolution of a BH binary in the semi-major a2(1 − e2)/a1 . 10. These are the only systems that can penetrate axis-eccentricity plane. Initial conditions are: m0 = 8 M⊙, m1 = ◦ the region delimited by the hatched area in the plot before attaining 12 M⊙, m2 = 10 M⊙; I = 97 ; a1 = 1.36 AU, a2 = 6.26 AU; ℓGW. e1 = 0.01, e2 = 0.2; ω1 = ω2 = 0. Short-dashed lines correspond to the indicated reference peak gravitational wave frequencies of 10 and 100 Hz. The dot-dashed line in the upper panel gives the 2000). Second, while at the quadrupole level orbits main- approximate condition for GW energy loss to dominate the evolu- tain their sense of rotation, in the octupole potential tion, Equation (14). To the left and below this line the BH binary excursions to very high eccentricities can be accompa- eccentricity and semi-major axis rapidly decrease when the system is evolved using the double average (octupole-level) equations of nied by a “flip” of the orbit with respect to the direc- motion (blue-dashed line). Arrows schematically indicate the di- tion of the total angular momentum (Naoz et al. 2011a; rection in which the binary evolution proceeds. The black-solid line Lithwick & Naoz 2011; Naoz et al. 2011b). Third, mo- displays the evolution of the BH binary obtained by using more ac- tion in the octupole potential can be stochastic, although curate 3-body integrations. After multiple periodic oscillations in the eccentricity have occurred (see lower panel), the binary reaches only a restricted portion of the near the li- very high eccentricities and chirps in the aLIGO frequency band. bration/circulation separatrix might be expected to be The orbital inspiral of the BH binary in this case starts and takes chaotic (Holman et al. 1997). place entirely within the aLIGO band. The lower panel shows Figure 1 shows that when expanded at the octupole time evolution of the actual distance of closest approach, Dmin, between the inner binary components (open circles) and the peri- level the secular theory leads to higher residual eccentric- apsis distance, a1(1 − e1), calculated from the current value of the ities and also appears to be in better agreement with the osculating orbital elements (solid line). Near the end of the sim- results of AR-CHAIN. This suggests that the excitation ulation the periapsis distance between the BHs changes such that of the inner binary eccentricity seen also in the direct in- the GW signal enters the aLIGO band in one orbital period before the rapid orbital circularization due to GW can start. This large tegrations depends on the importance of the Newtonian angular momentum change, achieved in one orbital period, allows octupole (or even higher) order terms to the evolution the BHs to attain a close approach and the GW signal to enter which break the axisymmetric nature of the potential the aLIGO band at high eccentricity. The peak GW frequency at the moment the insipral phase begins is significantly larger than and lead to large eccentricities without the need of high 10 Hz, about 45 Hz in this case. inclination tuning. From Figure 1 it is evident that the results of the direct gressively worse as e (or equivalently, the contribution 3-body integrations differ from the outcome of the secular 2 of the octupole order terms) approaches zero. code at least in one important way: while in the N body The discrepancy arises because, near a minimum in ℓ , runs for about 30% of the binaries the eccentricity− re- 1 the time mains high (e1 & 0.9) when they first enter the aLIGO − frequency band, the residual eccentricity of such binaries 1 dℓ 1 1 M a (1 e ) 3 1 T b 2 − 2 √1 e (17) is small when the same initial conditions are evolved us- ℓ dt ≈ b 5π m a − 1 ing the orbit average equations of motion. Note also that 1 2  1  the reliability of the secular approximation becomes pro- for the orbit to change from its current value of ℓ1 to

Black Hole Triple Dynamics 7

ℓ1 0 becomes shorter than the binary orbital period, proximately unchanged during the evolution before GW ∼ 3 radiation initiates the inspiral. In the case shown the Tb =2π a1/(GMb). In deriving Equation (17) we have assumed a fixed outer perturber, and adopted the instan- inspiral of the BH binary due to GW energy loss starts taneousp quadrupole order torque (e.g., Katz & Dong when its peak GW is about 45 Hz, or, equivalently, when 2013) taking the relevant limit e1 1 and assuming the periapsis distance is approximately 10Mb in geomet- maximal torque at the periapsis approach.→ This condi- ric units, and therefore takes place entirely within the tion can then be expressed in terms of the system semi- 10 Hz frequency band. In contrast, when using the dou- major axes and eccentricities as: ble average equations of motion, which do not contain information about orbital phases, the maximum eccen- m a 3 tricity attainable by the BH binary is artificially limited √1 e . 5π 2 1 = (18) − 1 M a (1 e ) by GW energy loss near ℓGW. b  2 − 2  The evolution of the GW signal emitted by highly m a 3 eccentric binaries in the aLIGO frequency band 8 10−3 2 2 10 1 . × Mb a2(1 e2) was discussed before in O’Leary et al. (2009) and   −  Kocsis & Levin (2012). The eccentric signature of these If the binary angular momentum becomes smaller than binaries would make them distinguishable from other this critical value the orbit can evolve substantially and GW sources; their GW signal will consist of an initial reach e1 1 on a timescale short compared to the binary phase of repeated bursts for minutes to days emitted orbital period,∼ implying that the orbit average approxi- during periapsis approach where the GW emission is mation formally breaks down. For objects of comparable maximized, followed by a continuous chirp signal and masses what determines whether or not this condition is an eccentric merger. The relevant timescales that deter- satisfied is the value of the ratio a2(1 e2)/a1 in Equa- mine the GW waveform are the orbital time, ∆torb = tion (18) which parametrizes the size of− the external or- 3 2π a1/GMb, and the duration of the periapsis pas- bit compared to the inner binary orbit. The tighter the 3 outer orbit the larger the torque produced on the inner sage,p ∆tper = π [a1(1 e1)] /GMb. The characteristic − BH binary, which implies that smaller eccentricities are duration of theq GW bursts is ∆tper, while ∆torb is the sufficient to meet the criterion given in Equation (18). time between two consecutive bursts. For ∆tper ∆torb, More specifically, what happens will depend on the waveform consists of a train of GW bursts≪ of char- whether changes of the binary angular momentum occur- acteristic duration ∆tper emitted quasi-periodically ev- ring in one orbital period are of order or larger than the ery ∆torb. Later, when ∆tper ∆torb, the signal be- angular momentum associated with the scale at which comes continuous in time domain.∼ For the system of 5 −4 other dynamical processes (e.g. SP or GW radiation) Figure 3 we find ∆torb =1.8 10 and ∆tper =3.4 10 can affect the evolution. As an example, consider the minutes at the instant where× the GW-driven inspiral× of −2 most relevant case in which, during the high-e phase of a the inner binary begins, and ∆torb = 5.1 10 and Kozai cycle, the binary angular momentum reaches the ∆t =3.1 10−4 minutes when the binary× eccentricity per × critical value defined in Equation (18) before SP and has decreased to e1 =0.95. GW radiation terms can become important. Since the 4. torque due to the outer BH is maximal near apoapsis COALESCING BLACK HOLE BINARIES IN while GW emission is peaked at periapsis, it is possible GLOBULAR CLUSTERS that a large change of angular momentum attained near Mergers of BH binaries forming via dynamical interac- apoapsis reduces ℓ1 < ℓGW, and does this in a fraction tions in GCs might dominate the total BH-BH merger of the orbital period before relativistic terms can affect event rates for aLIGO and are therefore of wide as- the evolution. If ℓGW is crossed while the BHs are near trophysical interest (Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2000; apoapsis, and the binary attains periapsis before ℓGW Abadie et al. 2010). Here, we determine the type and is passed over, the value of the angular momentum at properties of BH binary mergers in GCs induced by a which energy dissipation due to GW emission becomes combination of Kozai cycles and GW energy loss. Similar important can be significantly smaller than ℓGW. This studies were previously conducted by Miller & Hamilton allows the binary to have large eccentricities at large GW (2002a), Wen (2003) and O’Leary et al. (2006). These frequencies. Figure 2 illustrates the region of parameter papers, however, were limited to the traditional orbit space inside which binaries can undergo the non-secular average secular theory which we have shown to be inac- evolution discussed above and attain very large eccen- curate in describing the evolution of such systems. To tricities before GW radiation dominates the evolution. overcome the limitations of the orbit average approach These binaries reside in highly inclined-moderately hier- we perform in what follows direct integrations of the PN archical configurations with 3 . a2(1 e2)/a1 . 10. equations of motion describing hierarchical BH triples. An example is given in Figure 3, which− displays the time evolution of semi-major axis and eccentricity of a 4.1. Initial setup BH binary merger driven by the Kozai mechanism. To- The simulation initial conditions were generated as de- ward the end of the simulation, the binary achieves a tailed below. The most important quantities that affect large enough change in angular momentum such that its the maximum eccentricity a system can reach (and con- peak GW frequency crosses the aLIGO frequency band sequently its merger time) are a1 and a2/a1. For ex- in a fraction of an orbital period. Encounters occurring ample, the details of the mass parameter distributions before this time are at large enough distance that dissipa- have a relatively little effect on the eccentricity a system tive and non-dissipative relativistic corrections are both can reach. Monte Carlo simulations suggest a distribu- negligible. The semi-major axis of the binary remains ap- tion of periods for BH binaries inside globular clusters 8 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola which is approximately flat in log space (e.g., Figure 6 of parameters and limits of the various distributions were Downing et al. 2010). Accordingly, in a first set of sim- the same as defined above. This second set of initial ulations (MOD1 hereafter) the initial BH binary semi- conditions contain a larger number of wider configura- major axis, a1, was drown from a distribution which is tions with larger outer periapsis separation with respect flat in log space, f(log p) const, which corresponds to to MOD1; on the basis of our previous analysis (e.g., ∝ f(a) 1/a (i.e., Opik’s¨ law). The lower and upper limits Figure 2) we would therefore expect the secular orbit ∝ for a1 were 0.2 AU and 30 AU respectively. The lower average code to provide a better description of the BH- limit of 0.2 AU corresponds roughly to the minimum triple dynamics in this case and the coalescing binaries value of the semi-major axis distribution of BH binaries to have smaller eccentricities in the aLIGO band. MOD2 obtained via Monte Carlo simulations in Downing et al. corresponds to our most conservative assumptions. (2010); the upper limit of 30 AU is the same adopted Due to the crowded stellar environment of GCs, triple in Wen (2003). The outer orbit semi-maor axis, a2, was systems might be perturbed through encounters with also log-uniformly distributed. Thus we assumed that other stars on timescales that are shorter than the rele- the orbital semi-maor axis of the third component in a vant secular timescale (Kozai evolution). Such encoun- given triple could be chosen from a similar distribution ters will alter the orbital properties of the triple signif- of the parent binaries. We imposed an upper limit of icantly or even disrupt it. To account for this we set a = 30 a , given that the parameter range for a the final integration time in our simulations equal to the 2 × 1 1 decreases with increasing a2/a1 (Blaes et al. 2002; Wen timescale, 2003): for a2/a1 > 30 the binary merger time (Kozai 6 −3 10 pc AU 30 M⊙ timescale) becomes typically much longer than the col- T =2 105 yr , lision time with other field stars (Equation [20] below). coll × n a M + m    2   b 2  The initial eccentricities, e1 and e2, were sampled from a (20) thermal distribution, N(e) e. The physics behind such for collisions with field stars (Binney & Tremaine 1987), e and a distributions is well∝ known: it is the results of where n = 106 pc−3 is the number density of stars in energy relaxation in few body gravitational interactions the GC (e.g., Miller & Hamilton 2002a; Wen 2003). We which affect the binary/triple dynamical evolution. first evolved the systems forward in time by using the We adopted a random distribution in ω1 and ω2 and octupole level orbit average equations of motion and ob- ◦ ◦ random in cos(I) with 85 I 110 , as required tained an estimate of the binary merger time, T . We ≤ ≤ AV to obtain extremely large eccentricities. Orbital phases discarded systems that after a time Tcoll did not produce were also randomly distributed. Since unstable triples a merger event, while initial conditions that successfully are likely to dissociate before completing one Kozai cy- lead to a merger, i.e., cle (e.g., Figure 1), we only considered configuratios which satisfied the stability criterion given by Equa- TAV

and 9% (10%) have TNB/TAV < 0.1. These results sug- gest that the orbit average Hamiltonian model can lead to misleading results and to an incorrect determination of the merger time of BH binary mergers in GCs (a point we return to in 5). The merger time§ distribution of MOD1-bis is slightly biased towards longer merger times when compared to the results of the orbit average code. On the basis of our previous analysis, this is indeed not surprising. As de- scribed in the previous section the orbit average approx- imation becomes unreliable if the angular momentum of the inner binary changes on a time which is comparable or shorter than the inner binary orbital period, Tb. In the orbit average integrations systems that satisfy such condition typically merge when they first enter the high eccentricty phase of a Kozai cycle. Thus, the typical merger timescale of these systems will be the time scale to reach the maximum eccentricity of a Kozai cycle, i.e. roughly the Kozai time scale. In the N-body integra- tions instead, the binary angular momentum can reach and pass over the ℓ1 <ℓGW region before the binary at- tains periapsis. If this is the case, it might take many Kozai cycles before the two BHs attain a periapsis dis- tance such that the GW radiation dominated phase can start.

4.2.2. Eccentricity distributions The left and right panels of Figure 5 give the number and cumulative distributions of eccentricities for MOD1 at the moment the GW signal enters the 10 Hz and the 40 Hz frequency bands respectively. The histograms are normalized to the total number of systems that Fig. 4.— Top panel shows the cumulative distribution of merger manage to merge before being significantly perturbed times obtained via direct numerical integration of the equations by encounters with field stars. MOD1 and MOD1-bis of motion (solid lines) and from the orbit average Hamiltonian model (dashed lines). Lower panel gives the actual merger time of produce similar residual eccentricity distributions with individual systems (TNB) divided by the same timescale when com- about 50% (20%) of merging systems with eccentricities puted by using the secular orbit average code (TAV), as a function larger than 0.1 and roughly 10% (5%) of them with ex- of the periapsis separation of the outer BH. −5 tremely high eccentricities, 1 e1 . 10 , at the mo- ment they enter the 10 Hz (40− Hz) frequency band. The 3-body simulations. reason for the gap in the eccentricity distributions be- 4.2. Results tween e1 0.6 and 1 resides in the fact that when a BH binary inspiral∼ begins outside the 10 Hz requency then 4.2.1. Merger time distributions it remains outside this frequency band as it circularizes In MOD1 we found that 61% of systems that merged and evolves at roughly constan periapsis and peak grav- when evolved using the double average equations of mo- itational wave frequency (e.g., dashed blue line in Fig. tion also merged when evolved via direct N body inte- 3). Thus, even an initially very eccentric binary will be grations. In MOD2 this percentage increases,− but only typically circularized by the time it reaches the 10Hz fre- slightly, to 70%. The upper panel of Figure 4 compares quency. the cumulative distribution of merger times for BH bina- Results of integrations of MOD2, in which eccentric- ries calculated via direct integrations with merger times ities and semi-major axes follow uniform distributions, obtained by using the orbit average code. The two meth- are displayed in Figure 6. In this case we found that ods generate similar merger time distributions. roughly 30% (10%) of merging systems have eccentrici- The bottom panel in Figure 4 shows the merger time of ties larger than 0.1 and 7% (3%) of them have extremely −4 individual systems, TNB, which we divided by the merger high eccentricities, 1 e1 . 10 , at the moment they en- time computed by using the orbit average model and ter the 10 Hz (40 Hz)− frequency band. Due to the larger plotted as a function of a (1 e )/a . Most mergers values of a (1 e )/a adopted in this second set of initial 2 − 2 1 2 − 2 1 occur at 3 . a2(1 e2)/a1 . 10, a regime where the conditions the residual eccentricity distributions contain assumptions behind− the secular approach are not valid. less eccentric orbits than in Figure 5, in agreement with As a result the merger time obtained via the standard the results of 3.2. However, the basic results of our Kozai treatment can be inaccurate by several orders of study, i.e., a large§ fraction of coalescing binaries with a magnitude; this is especially true for the systems with finite eccentricity and about 10% of them with an ex- the shortest periapsis separations. In MOD1 (MOD2) treme eccentricity, remain essentially unchanged. After we found that 13% (10%) of binaries have TNB/TAV > 10 this paper was submitted, Antognini et al. (2013) pre- 10 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola 100 N-body N-body fGW=10Hz Secular-code fGW=40Hz Secular-code 1 1 N(

10 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 N(%) 0.2 0.2 Eccentrcity Eccentrcity 0 0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Eccentrcity Eccentricity

Fig. 5.— Histograms of the eccentricity distribution in MOD1 of coalescing BH binaries driven by the Kozai mechanism in GCs when their emitted GW signal first enters the 10 Hz (left panel) and the 40 Hz (right panel) frequency bands. Insert panels show the corresponding cumulative distribution of eccentricities. Distributions are normalized to the total number of systems that merge before being perturbed by encounters with other stars in the cluster. Systems were evolved using both the octupole-order orbit average equations of motion (hatched histograms and dashed lines) and more accurate 3-body direct integrations (filled histograms and solid lines). The 3-body runs produce orbital distributions that are significantly more biased towards large eccentricities, and predict that about 50 % of merging binaries have eccentricities larger than 0.1 and that 10 % of them posses extremely large eccentricities (e1 ∼ 1) when they first enter the aLIGO frequency band. The number of these highly eccentric GW sources is strongly underestimated when using the orbit average (secular) code. Dotted lines in the insert panels give the cumulative distribution of eccentricities of coalescing BH binaries in MOD1-bis. In this model the 3-body initial conditions were sampled from the entire distribution corresponding to MOD1, instead of being selected on the basis of Equation (21).

100 N-body N-body fGW=10Hz Secular-code fGW=40Hz Secular-code 1 1 N(

10 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 N(%) 0.2 0.2 Eccentrcity Eccentrcity 0 0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Eccentrcity Eccentricity Fig. 6.— Same as Figure 5 but adopting an initial uniform distribution in semi-major axes and eccentricities (MOD2). sented a similar study on the breakdown of the secular least partially in the criterion used in Wen (2003) for se- approximation and found a similar fraction of eccentric lecting stable versus unstable systems, see Equation (42) compact object binary mergers. of Wen (2003). This equation ignores the (1 e2) term The initial conditions for MOD2 are somewhat more that appears at the denominator in the right hand− side of similar to what was adopted in Wen (2003). Using the our Equation (11). This could allow for initial conditions quadrupole order orbit average equations, Wen finds that with larger values of e2 and therefore smaller periapsis about 2 % of binaries have e1 1 at 10 Hz. When using separation than in our simulations and lead to an arti- the double average equations∼ of motion, we find, con- ficial bias toward large residual eccentricities as shown trary to Wen, that the percentage of such high eccentric in Figure 1. We already mentioned, as an example, the sources is only 0.1% of the total number of coalescing system of Figure 8 of Wen (2003). This system produces binaries. a very eccentric GW source, e1 0.9 at 10 Hz, but in We believe that the nature of the discrepancy resides at reality this is a highly unstable∼ triple according to the Black Hole Triple Dynamics 11

did this by using the direct numerical integrator AR- CHAIN which includes PN corrections to the equa- tions of motion up to order 2.5 and the algorith- mically regularized chain structure to avoid singulari- ties (Mikkola & Merritt 2008). We have shown that the presence of a third outer BH can drive the inner bi- nary at very high eccentricities; at which point the BHs can rapidly merge before the triple system is perturbed or disrupted through gravitational encounters with clus- ter field stars and on timescales much shorter than for similar binaries that are evolved in isolation. We deter- mined the properties of coalescing BH binaries in GCs and compared the results of our 3-body simulations to the predictions of the standard orbit average treatment in which the equations of motion are averaged over the rapidly varying mean anomalies of inner and outer orbit. We have demonstrated that the orbit average treatment leads to incorrect results if the inner binary is orbited by an outer perturber at a small distance (Equation [18]). Fig. 7.— Dominant GW frequency at the instant where the GW- The implications of our results are discussed in what driven inspiral of inner binary begins to dominate over the Kozai- follows. dynamics. Shown is a subset of the 3-body configurations from Figure 5 (solid line for MOD1 and dotted line for MOD1-bis) and 5.1. Eccentric gravitational wave sources Figure 6 (dashed line), namely those with e1 ≥ 0.9 at this instant. 80% of these binaries reach this point at a GW frequency of fGW ≤ The 3 body integrations presented in this paper pre- 100Hz. dict a large− number (30 50%) of GW sources with − a substantial eccentricity (e1 & 0.1) in the high fre- Mardling & Aarseth (2001) stability criterion (see also quency band of GW detectors. We predict the exis- our Figure 1). Moreover, we note that most of the ini- tence of a large population of extremely eccentric GW −5 tial conditions that in Wen’s Monte-Carlo experiments sources, (1 e1) . 10 , that will be potentially de- would allow the binary to enter the aLIGO band at high tectable by− advanced GW detectors. These mergers are eccentricities, a2/a1 = 3 in her Table 1, are unstable driven by Kozai (like) dynamics in moderately hierarchi- even according to Equation (42) of Wen. Additional ex- cal triple systems that are predicted to efficiently form periments, in which we varied integration parameters, via dynamical exchange interactions in the dens core of changed the integrator itself, and also used a different globular clusters.The number of these highly eccentric code (that of Prodan & Murray 2012) convinced us of GW sources is strongly underestimated when adopting the robustness of our results. the secular approach. The dominant GW frequency at which a binary first Eccentric sources have a unique GW signal compared becomes a potentially detectable GW source can be sub- to circular binaries. Initially, they will repeatedly burst stantially larger than 10 Hz (e.g., Figure 3). This could in the aLIGO band at each periapsis approach where in principle affect the detectability of eccentric sources the GW emission is maximized. The broad-band na- even assuming one has a perfect inspiral waveform tem- ture of the GW signal emitted during the repeated bursts plate. In fact, the detectability of a BH binary is related phase could make these sources potentially detectable at to how much energy is radiated in the frequency range larger distances and in a broader mass range than circu- where aLIGO will be more sensitive, i.e. around 100 Hz. lar mergers (e.g., O’Leary et al. 2009; Kocsis & Levin If the pericenter of an highly eccentric orbit is such that 2012). For example, the inspiral of a stellar BH with 3 it has a peak frequency above this range, then most of another BH of mass 10 M⊙ may be revealed by the GW energy would be radiated at higher frequencies aLIGO only if the event∼ is sufficiently eccentric during than 100 Hz, making such source difficult to detect. The plunge (O’Leary et al. 2009). Later the binary transits typical GW peak frequency of eccentric sources is given to lower eccentricities and to a continuous powerful chirp in Figure 7 which displays the cumulative distribution of signal within the frequency band of aLIGO type detec- peak GW frequencies at the moment the inspiral due to tors. GW energy loss starts. We do this only for systems in the The detection of GW signal requires a bank of theoret- left panel of Figure 5 and Figure 6 with residual eccentric- ical modeled binary inspiral waveforms as filters. Cur- ities larger than 0.9. We find that about 80 % (50 %) of rent searches for binary BHs rely on circular binary tem- coalescing binaries have fGW < 100 Hz (fGW < 40 Hz) plates based on PN modeling of the inspiral phase in at the instant where the GW-driven inspiral begins to the weak-field slow-motion regime (Blanchet 2006), and dominate over the Kozai-dynamics. Thus most eccentric numerical relativity simulations to describe the merger sources could be efficiently detected by aLIGO, provided phase in the strong gravity field regime (Pretorius 2005; an efficient search strategy. Campanelli et al. 2006; Baker et al. 2006). An exten- 5. sive review of the current status of numerical simulations DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS of compact binary mergers is given in Pfeiffer (2012). We have explored the dynamical evolution of hierar- There are at least three reasons why filter templates are chical BH triples and investigated the conditions which currently limited to circular binary waveforms. First, cir- lead to the rapid merger of BH binaries in GCs. We cular binaries remain a very important GW source, prob- 12 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola ably the most important one. Specifically, NS-NS sys- favorable conditions for the assembly of BH binaries. The tems are the primary target for aLIGO. Second, for cir- coalescence of such binaries through GW radiation could cular binaries, one can push the PN expansions to higher be a major observational target for the next generation of order (via energy balance arguments). This allows one to ground-based GW detectors (e.g., Sadowski et al. 2008). constract PN waveforms that are of sufficient quality for Due to the computational challenge of simulating the detection for total mass m0 + m1 12 M⊙. Currently, long-term evolution of massive clusters with direct 3- eccentric PN waveforms are not known≤ to similar high or- body simulations, predictions of event rates for the GW der, thus an eccentric PN waveform of sufficient accuracy sources investigated in this paper remain largely un- does not exist. Third, circular binaries tend to be dom- certain. A key question is whether BHs are efficiently inated by (2,2) and (2,-2) radiation. If one discards all ejected through strong binary interactions during the other modes, and looks only for (2,2) waveform-modes, cluster evolution. Efficient depletion of the remnant pop- then it turns out sky-position, source-orientation, and ulation would decrease the chance for the BHs to undergo orbital phase of the binary are all degenerate. There- repeated exchange interactions in the cluster core and fore, the dimensionality of the parameter space dramat- become part of hierarchical triple systems. For the less ically collapses. Eccentric waveforms will have a much massive and ancient GCs, the BH population might self- more complex emission pattern, breaking this degener- deplete in less than a few Gyr before the cluster enters acy. Adding eccentricity to binary templates would also the cosmological volume of aLIGO (z 2). This will imply that more templates are needed which will require reduce the number of systems that will manage∼ to merge a higher signal to noise threshold for a given significance. within GCs due to the Kozai mechanism and become This might reduce, at least in part, the detectability ben- detectable sources of GW radiation. efit one could get for eccentric binaries. Monte-Carlo simulations have been extensively used The effect of eccentricity in aLIGO searches was in- to study the evolution of BH populations in GCs and vestigated in Brown & Zimmernman (2010) and more to determine the event rates of BH binary mergers in recently in Huerta & Brown (2013). These authors find the Universe (e.g., O’Leary et al. 2006; Downing et al. that circularized waveforms are sufficient to recover the 2010, 2011). These models suggest that after its for- signal emitted by eccentric sources with eccentricities less mation the cluster’s BH population typically evaporates than 0.1 at a fiducial GW frequency of 14 Hz. Thus the over a Gyr timescale. This prediction has been chal- eccentric∼ binaries found in our study cannot be efficiently lenged by recent theoretical studies (Morscher et al. detected by advanced detectors with current search pipe- 2013; Sippe & Hurley 2013) and by observational evi- lines. Optimal searches for such systems would require dence (Maccarone et al. 2007; Brassington et al. 2010; replacement of the conventional quasi-circular aLIGO Maccarone et al. 2011; Strader et al. 2012) which sug- templates with eccentric-binary templates for data anal- gest that old GCs may still contain hundreds of stellar ysis, or the use of more practical excess power searches BHs at present. We add that most Monte-Carlo codes do with stacking (East et al. 2013). not allow for the formation of the long-lived hierarchical Although eccentric binaries are frequent in our simula- triples investigated in this paper (e.g., Downing et al. tions, we found that about half of them will posses eccen- 2010, 2011) or when they do (O’Leary et al. 2006) they tricities smaller than 0.1 when their dominant GW fre- employ the orbit average formalism which we have shown quency becomes larger than 40 Hz such that they might to lead to unreliable results and inaccurate determination be detected even with regular templates. After detection, of merger times (e.g., Figure 4). An isolated example of the careful re-analysis of the aLIGO data could reveal high precision N-body simulations of the evolution of “pre-merger flares” from Kozai resonances. If those are stellar clusters containing a population of massive rem- found, the precise timing of the pre-merger flares would nants was recently presented by Aarseth (2012). This carry information about the triple system. The detection author finds that the conditions for BH binary mergers of such systems could give us unprecedented insights on in GCs are typically initiated by a combination of GW the dynamical processes that have shaped the dense cen- energy loss and the Kozai resonance induced by the pres- tral environment of GCs and galaxies and lead to the ence of a third object, usually another BH. formation and growth of massive and intermediate mass More sophisticated N-body simulations, or Monte- BHs (Miller & Hamilton 2002b). Carlo codes including more precise prescriptions for the dynamical evolution of hierarchical BH triples would be 5.2. Merger rates and black hole populations in required in order to address the role of the Kozai reso- globular clusters nance in determining the rates of BH binary mergers in Adopting standard initial mass functions, about 1% of GCs. It is useful however to give a simple estimate of the total mass in a stellar system will be in BHs that how many such eccentric events are likely to be detected formed through the supernova explosions of the most with aLIGO. massive stars (& 20 M⊙). Soon after their formation, We estimate the detection rate of eccentric BH binary the BHs will be the heaviest component of the stellar mergers due to the Kozai mechanism as: cluster, with a mass about 10 times larger than the mass 4π 3 of a typical cluster star (Woosley et al. 2002). Gravita- ΓaLIGO = D nclΓmergeftriplefecc (22) tional encounters tend to accelerate the lowest mass stars 3 to the highest velocities, at the expense of the specific ki- where D is the maximum distance from which the emit- netic energy of the BHs, which will migrate down to the ted GW signal from a BH binary inspiral can be detected, cluster core. This process, typically referred to as “mass- ncl is the number density of GCs, Γmerg is the merger rate segregation” (Spitzer 1987), leads to the formation of a of BH binaries that occur within the cluster, ftriple is the centrally concentrated sub-cluster of stellar BHs and to fraction of such mergers induced by the Kozai mecha- Black Hole Triple Dynamics 13 nism, and fecc is the fraction of mergers due to the Kozai We finally note that the results derived here mechanism which retain a large eccentricity, e > 0.1, in could also apply to a variety of astrophysical the aLIGO band. Based on the Monte Carlo simulations systems. These include stellar binaries, star- of O’Leary et al. (2006) (see their Table 2) we take a compact object binaries (Mazeh & Shaham 1979; conservative rate of 10 mergers inside GC per 1010 yr Eggleton & Kisseleva-Eggleton 2006) and binaries resid- ≈ and that a fraction ftriple 0.05 of these mergers are ing in galactic nuclei near massive BHs (Antonini et al. due to the Kozai mechanism.≈ From our simulations we 2010a; Antonini & Perets 2012; Prodan et al. 2013b). have fecc 0.5. If we take a globular number density For these binaries GW radiation is likely not to play an of 10/Mpc≈3 (Brodie & Strader 2006), and that BH-BH important role. Their merger could be however induced mergers can be seen out to a sky-averaged distance of by the Kozai mechanism combined with tidal friction. 1 Gpc (as expected for 10 M⊙ 10 M⊙ coalescences), These systems could also experience the non-secular and if we assume that mergers are− distributed uniformly dynamical evolution discussed here, which would largely over the lifetimes of the globulars (as opposed to hap- increase the chance of collisions with respect to what was pening primarily early on), then Equation (22) gives an previously thought. Mergers of main sequence binaries aLIGO detection rate of eccentric BH binary mergers due are known to be a possible source of blue struggles in to the Kozai mechanism of ΓaLIGO 1/yr. Thus a uni- GCs (Perets & Fabrycky 2009), they might produce a form rate of mergers amounting to a≈ few per Hubble time population of rejuvenated stars at the Galactic cen- per cluster gives a relatively large population of eccen- ter (Antonini et al. 2011), and result in optical (e.g., tric BH binaries. We note that adopting a uniform rate Tylenda et al. 2011) and X-ray (Antonini et al. of mergers might be an optimistic assumption for galax- 2010b) transient events. The formation of type Ia ies similar to the Milky Way. In fact, Galactic globular supernovae could also be induced by similar pro- clusters appear to be exclusively old (& 10 Gyr) stel- cesses (Katz & Dong 2013). A more quantitative lar systems (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 1999), implying that study of the evolution of moderately-hierarchical triples most BH mergers are likely to have occurred early on at containing binaries with main-sequence star components high redshifts. However, this might not be the case in and various types of stellar remnants will be the topic many external galaxies in which massive globular (like) of future work. clusters often appear to form in an ongoing and contin- uous process (Larsen & Richtler 2000). We thank the referee for his/her valuable comments. We are grateful to C. Miller, H. Pfeiffer and S. Prodan for useful comments that helped to improve an earlier 5.3. Merger of binaries with stellar components version of the manuscript. We acknowledge helpful dis- cussions with Y. Lithwick and F. Will.

REFERENCES Aarseth, S. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 841 Eggleton, P. P. & Kisseleva-Eggleton, L. 2006, Ap&SS, 304, 75 Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abernathy, M., Accadia, Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 T., Acernese, F., Adams, C., Adhikari, R., Ajith, P., Allen, B., Farr, W. M., Sravan, N, Cantrell, A., Kreidberg, L., Bailyn, & et al. 2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 173001 C. D., Mandel, I., & Kalogera, V. 2011, ApJ, 741, 103F Abramovic, A. et al. 1992, Science, 256, 325 Fehlberg, E. 1968, NASA Tech Rep, TR T-287 Acernese, et al. 2008, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25, 114045 Ford, E. B., Kozinsky, B., & Rasio, F. A. 2000, ApJ, 535, 385 Antognini, J. M., Shappee, B. J., Thompson T. A., & Ford, E. B., Kozinsky, B., & Rasio, F. A. 2000b, ApJ, 535, 385 Amaro-Seoane, P. 2013, ArXiv Fryeg, C. L., Kalogera, Vassiliki 2001, ApJ, 554, 548 Antonini, F., & Perets, H. 2012, ApJ, 757, 27 Hamers, A. S., Pols, O. R., Claeys, J. S. W., & Nelemans, G. Antonini, F., Faber, J., Gualandris, A., & Merritt, D. 2010a, ApJ, 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2262 713, 90 Harry, G. M. & LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2010, Classical Antonini, F. et al. 2010b, ApJ, 717, 795 and Quantum Gravity, 27, 084006 Antonini F., Lombardi J., & Merritt D., 2011, ApJ, 731, 128 Heggie, D. C. 1975, MNRAS, 173, 729 Bailyn, C. D., Jain, R. K.; Coppi, P., & Orosz, J. A. 1998, ApJ, Hellstr¨om, C., & Mikkola, S. 2010, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Ast., 106, 143 499, 367 Holman, M., Touma, J., & Tremaine, S. 1997, Nature, 386, 254 Baker, J. G, Centrella, J., Choi, D. I., Koppitz, M. & van Meter, Huerta, E. A., & Brown, D. A. 2013, arXiv:1301.1895 J. 2006, Phys.Rev.Lett., 96, 111102 Innanen, K. A., Zheng, J. Q.,Mikkola, S., & Valtonen, M. J. 1997, Banerjee, S.,Baumgardt, H., Kroupa, P. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 371 AJ, 113, 1915 Belczynski, K., Kalogera, V. & Bulik., T. A 2002, ApJ, 572, 407 Kalogera, V., Belczynski, K., Kim, C., O’Shaughnessy, R., & Belczynski, K., Taam, R. E., Kalogera, V., Rasio, F. A., & Bulik, Willems B. 2007, Physics Reports, 442, 75 T. 2007, ApJ, 662, 504 Katz, B., Dong, S., & Malhorta, R. 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 107, Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics (Princeton, 181101 NJ: Princeton University Press) Katz, B. & Dong, S. arXiv:1211.4584 Blaes, O., Lee, M. H., & Socrates, A. 2002, ApJ, 578, 775 Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591 Blanchet, L. 2006, Living Rev. Rel., 9, 4 Kocsis, B., & Levin, J. 2012, Physical Review, 85, 3005 Brassington, N. J. et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1805 Kulkarni, S. R., Hut, P., & McMillan, S. 1993, Nature, 364, 421 Brodie, J. P., & Strader, J. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 193 Larsen, S. S., & Richtler, T. 2000, A&A, 354, 836 Brown, D., & Zimmenrman, P. J. 2010, Phys. Rev., 81, 4007 Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719 Campanelli, M., Lousto, C., Marronetti, P., & Zlochower, Y. Lithwick, Y., & Naoz, S. 2011, ApJ, 742, 94 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 111101 Maccarone, T. J., Kundu, A., Zepf, S. E., & Rhode, K. L. 2007, Damour, T. & Deruelle, N. 1985, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´e Nature, 445, 183 Phys. Th´eor., Vol. 43, No. 1, p. 107 - 132, 43, 107 Maccarone, T. J., Kundu, A., Zepf, S. E., & Rhode, K. L. 2011, Downing, J. M. B., Benacquista, M. J., Giersz, M., & Spurzem, MNRAS, 410, 1655 R. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1946 Mardling, R. A., & Aarseth, S. J. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 398 Downing, J. M. B., Benacquista, M. J., Giersz, M., & Spurzem, Mazeh, T. & Shaham, J. 1979, A&A, 77, 145 R. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 133 Merritt, D., Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei, 2013, East, W. E., McWilliams, S. T., Levin, J., Pretorius, F. 2013, Princeton University Press Physical Review, 87, 3004 14 Antonini, Murray & Mikkola

Mikkola, S., & Aarseth, S. J. 1993, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 57, Pfeiffer, H. P. 2012, Class. Quant. Grav., 29, 124004 439 Portegies Zwart, S. F., & McMillan, S. L. W. 2000, ApJ, 528, L17 Mikkola, S., & Merritt, D. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 219 Portegies Zwart, S. F. & Yungelson, L. R., 1998, A&A, 332, 173 Mikkola, S., & Merritt, D. 2008, AJ, 135, 2398 Pretorius, F. 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 121101 Miller, M. C. & Hamilton, D. P. 2002, ApJ, 576, 894 Prodan, S. & Murray, N. 2012, ApJ, 747, 4 Miller, M. C. & Hamilton, D. P. 2002, ApJ, MNRAS, 330, 232 Prodan, S., Murray, N., Thompson, T. A. 2013, arXiv1305.2191 Miller, M. C., & Lauburg, V. M. 2009, ApJ, 692, 917 Prodan, S., Antonini, F., & Hagai, Perets 2013 (in preparation) Morscher, M., Umbreit, S., Farr, W. M., & Rasio, F. A. 2013, Rosenberg, A., Saviane, I., Piotto, G., & Aparicio, A. 1999 AJ, ApJ, 763, L15 118, 2306 Naoz, S., Farr, W. M., Lithwick, Y., Rasio, F. A., & Teyssandier, Sadowski, A., Belczynski, K., Bulik, T., Ivanova, N., Rasio, F. A.; J. 2011a, Nature, 473, 187 O’Shaughnessy, R. 2008, ApJ, 676, 1162 Naoz, S., Farr, W. M., Lithwick, Y., Rasio, F. A., & Teyssandier, Sigurdsson, S., Phinney, E. S. 1993, ApJ, 415, 631 J. 2011b, arXiv1107.2414 Sigurdsson, S., Hernquist, L. 1993, Nature, 364, 423 Naoz, S., Bence K., Abraham Loeb, & Nicol´as Y. 2013, ApJ, 773, Sippel, A. C. & Hurley, J. R. 2013, MNRAS, 430, L30 187 Spitzer, L. 1987, Dynamical evolution of globular clusters Seto, Naoki 2013, ArXiv (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1987, 191 p.) Narayan, R., Piran, T. & Shemi, A. 1991, ApJ, 379, L17 Strader, J., Chomiuk, L., Maccarone, T. J., Miller-Jones, J. C. O’Leary, R. M., Kocsis, B., & Loeb, A. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 2127 A., & Seth, A. C. 2012, Nature, 490, 71 O’Leary, R. M., Rasio, F. A., Fregeau, J. M., Ivanova, N., & Tylenda, R. et al. 2011, A&A, 528, 114 O’Shaughnessy, R. 2006, ApJ, 637, 937 Thompson, T. A. 2011, ApJ, 741, 82 O’Shaughnessy, R., Kim, C., Kalogera, V., & Belczynski, K. 2007, Wen, L. 2003, ApJ, 598, 419 ApJ, 672, 479 Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. 2002, Reviews of Ozel,¨ F., Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. 2010, ApJ, Modern Physics, 74, 1015 725, 1918 Perets, H. B. & Fabrycky, D. C. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1048 Peters, P. C. 1964, Physical Review, 136, 1224