A Note on Transcription and Place Names

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Note on Transcription and Place Names A Note on Transcription and Place Names The transcription of Hebrew in this book reflects the pronunciation of modern Hebrew rather than Ashkenazi pronunciation used by the Hasidim themselves. No attempt is made to indicate the distinctions between alef and ‘ayin (both rep- resented by apostrophe), tet and taf, kaf and kuf, and sin and samekh. However, the distinction between ḥet and khaf has been retained, using ḥ for the former and kh for the latter. Thedagesh is not indicated except where it affects pronun- ciation. However, transcriptions that are well established have been retained even when they are not consistent with the system adopted. On similar grounds, the tsadi (usually represented by ts) is rendered by tz in such familiar words as bar mitzvah or when it could create a confusion before h or ḥ; hence, Yitzḥak instead of Yitsḥak. The final heh is indicated too, though numerous exceptions appear. Prefixes, prepositions, and conjunctions are followed by hyphens: be- toledot ha- ’am. Sheva na’ is represented by e. The transcription of Yiddish follows the YIVO system. In both Yiddish and Hebrew, capital letters are used only in cases of proper names and for words that are capitalized in Eng lish, for example, r. Yisra’el mi- Ruzhin u- mekomo be- toledot ha-ḥ asidut. For names of p eople in both Yiddish and Hebrew, the spellings that they used or that became common in popu lar use— for example, Assaf (not Asaf), Peretz (not Perets)— have been retained. With regard to place names, I have used the Polish form for all localities in territories of the former Polish- Lithuanian Commonwealth; Hungarian for the territory of the Kingdom of Hungary; and Romanian for Moldavia, Wallachia, Bessarabia, and Bukovina, excepting cities that have well- known En glish names (e.g., Warsaw, not Warszawa) and post- Holocaust contexts, for which I use con temporary forms. Where the Yiddish form is markedly diff er ent from its Polish/Hungarian/Romanian/Ukrainian/Belarus sian/Lithuanian equiva- lent, I add a transcription of the Yiddish name in the standard northeast dialect vii viii A Note on Transcription and Place Names in parentheses: Mstów (Amstov). The rule is reversed in the case of Hasidic courts and several personalities (e.g., the Maiden of Ludmir), for which transcription of the Yiddish name typically associated with the court, tsadik, or other personality residing there is followed by its Polish/Hungarian/Romanian equivalent: Amshi- nov (Mszczonów), Ger (Góra Kalwaria). However, when the Yiddish form differs from the Polish/Hungarian/Romanian one only by omission of diacriticals or very minor alteration, I use the latter only: Słonim, not Slonim; Radomsko, not Radomsk. Studying Hasidism v .
Recommended publications
  • Review of David Assaf, the Regal Way: the Life and Times of R
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Near Eastern Languages and Departmental Papers (NELC) Civilizations (NELC) 2000 Review of David Assaf, The Regal Way: The Life and Times of R. Israel of Ruzhin Dan Ben-Amos University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers Part of the Cultural History Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Ben-Amos, D. (2000). Review of David Assaf, The Regal Way: The Life and Times of R. Israel of Ruzhin. Jewish Folklore and Ethnology Review, 20 (1-2), 180-180. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/ nelc_papers/122 The publication in which this item appeared has since ceased. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/nelc_papers/122 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review of David Assaf, The Regal Way: The Life and Times of R. Israel of Ruzhin Abstract Hagiography and history tell their stories at cross-purposes. While hagiography glorifies, even sanctifies its heroes, history strips them of their traditional greatness, seeking to bare the factual truth to which documents and testimonies attest. Nowhere is this contrast more evident than in the history and study of Hasidism. Legends (shevahim) are the building blocks of the Hasidic tradition, in which the rabbi is a leader, a miracle worker and a storyteller. He is the narrating subject, who, in turn, becomes the object of stories subsequent generations tell. Disciplines Cultural History | Jewish Studies | Near and Middle Eastern Studies | Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Comments The publication in which this item appeared has since ceased.
    [Show full text]
  • Lelov: Cultural Memory and a Jewish Town in Poland. Investigating the Identity and History of an Ultra - Orthodox Society
    Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Item Type Thesis Authors Morawska, Lucja Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 03/10/2021 19:09:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/7827 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Lucja MORAWSKA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2012 i Lucja Morawska Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Key words: Chasidism, Jewish History in Eastern Europe, Biederman family, Chasidic pilgrimage, Poland, Lelov Abstract. Lelov, an otherwise quiet village about fifty miles south of Cracow (Poland), is where Rebbe Dovid (David) Biederman founder of the Lelov ultra-orthodox (Chasidic) Jewish group, - is buried.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassidus on the Chassidus on the Parsha +
    LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) SH EVI’I SHEL PESACH _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah Shevi’i Shel Pesach – Kerias Yam Suf Walking on Dry Land Even in the Sea “And Bnei Yisrael walked on dry land in the sea” (Shemos 14:29) How can you walk on dry land in the sea? The Noam Elimelech , in Likkutei Shoshana , explains this contradictory-sounding pasuk as follows: When Bnei Yisrael experienced the Exodus and the splitting of the sea, they witnessed tremendous miracles and unbelievable wonders. There are Tzaddikim among us whose h earts are always attuned to Hashem ’s wonders and miracles even on a daily basis; they see not common, ordinary occurrences – they see miracles and wonders. As opposed to Bnei Yisrael, who witnessed the miraculous only when they walked on dry land in the sp lit sea, these Tzaddikim see a miracle as great as the “splitting of the sea” even when walking on so -called ordinary, everyday dry land! Everything they experience and witness in the world is a miracle to them. This is the meaning of our pasuk : there are some among Bnei Yisrael who, even while walking on dry land, experience Hashem ’s greatness and awesome miracles just like in the sea! This is what we mean when we say that Hashem transformed the sea into dry land. Hashem causes the Tzaddik to witness and e xperience miracles as wondrous as the splitting of the sea, even on dry land, because the Tzaddik constantly walks attuned to Hashem ’s greatness and exaltedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation
    EXTENSION GRANTED UNTIL OCTOBER 15,2011 Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF a or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation Department of the Treasury 2009 Internal Revenue Service Note. The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements. For calendar year 2009, or tax year beginning DEC 1, 200 9 , and ending NOV 30, 2010 G Check all that apply: Initial return 0 Initial return of a former public charity LJ Final return n Amended return n Address chance n Name chance of foundation A Employer identification number Use the IRS Name label Otherwise , ROSSMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION 11-2994863 print Number and street (or P O box number if mad is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number ortype. 1461 53RD STREET ( 718 ) -369-2200 See Specific City or town, state, and ZIP code C If exem p tion app lication is p endin g , check here 10-E] Instructions 0 1 BROOKLYN , NY 11219 Foreign organizations, check here ► 2. Foreign aanizations meeting % test, H Check type of organization. ®Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation chec here nd att ch comp t atiooe5 Section 4947(a )( nonexem pt charitable trust 0 Other taxable private foundation 1 ) E If p rivate foundation status was terminated I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: ® Cash 0 Accrual under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here (from Part Il, co! (c), line 16) 0 Other (specify) F If the foundation is in a 60-month terminatio n $ 3 , 333 , 88 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • AJS Perspectives: the Magazine TABLE of CONTENTS of the Association for Jewish Studies President from the Editor
    ERSPECTIVESERSPECTIVES AJSPPThe Magazine of the Association for Jewish Studies IN THIS ISSUE: Orthodoxy Then and Now SPRING 2008 AJS Perspectives: The Magazine TABLE OF CONTENTS of the Association for Jewish Studies President From the Editor. 3 Sara R. Horowitz York University Editor From the President . 5 Allan Arkush Binghamton University From the Executive Director . 7 Editorial Board Howard Adelman Orthodoxy Then and Now Queen's University Alanna Cooper University of Massachusetts Amherst Becoming Orthodox: The Story of a Denominational Label Jonathan Karp Jeffrey C. Blutinger . 8 Binghamton University Heidi Lerner Historicizing Orthodoxy Stanford University Frances Malino Jay Berkovitz . 12 Wellesley College Vanessa Ochs Thoughts on the Study of the Orthodox Community: University of Virginia After Thirty-Five Years Riv-Ellen Prell Samuel Heilman . 16 University of Minnesota Shmuel Shepkaru University of Oklahoma Religious Feminism in Israel: A Revolution in Process Abe Socher Irit Koren. 20 Oberlin College Shelly Tenenbaum Haredi Counter History: Some Theoretical Clark University and Methodological Aspects Keith Weiser York University Nahum Karlinsky . 26 Steven Zipperstein Stanford University Haredim and the Study of Haredim in Israel: Managing Editor Reflections on a Recent Conference Karin Kugel Kimmy Caplan and Nurit Stadler. 30 Executive Director Rona Sheramy Graphic Designer Perspectives on Technology: Matt Biscotti Wild 1 Graphics, Inc. Researching Orthodox Judaism Online Heidi Lerner . 36 Please direct correspondence to: Association for Jewish Studies Ethnographic Sketches from the Future of Jewish Studies Center for Jewish History 15 West 16th Street Marcy Brink-Danan . 42 New York, NY 10011 Voice: (917) 606-8249 Reflections on Jewish Studies, Twenty Years Later Fax: (917) 606-8222 E-Mail: [email protected] Howard Tzvi Adelman.
    [Show full text]
  • Hasidic Judaism - Wikipedia, the Freevisited Encyclopedi Ona 1/6/2015 Page 1 of 19
    Hasidic Judaism - Wikipedia, the freevisited encyclopedi ona 1/6/2015 Page 1 of 19 Hasidic Judaism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Sephardic pronunciation: [ħasiˈdut]; Ashkenazic , תודיסח :Hasidic Judaism (from the Hebrew pronunciation: [χaˈsidus]), meaning "piety" (or "loving-kindness"), is a branch of Orthodox Judaism that promotes spirituality through the popularization and internalization of Jewish mysticism as the fundamental aspect of the faith. It was founded in 18th-century Eastern Europe by Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov as a reaction against overly legalistic Judaism. His example began the characteristic veneration of leadership in Hasidism as embodiments and intercessors of Divinity for the followers. [1] Contrary to this, Hasidic teachings cherished the sincerity and concealed holiness of the unlettered common folk, and their equality with the scholarly elite. The emphasis on the Immanent Divine presence in everything gave new value to prayer and deeds of kindness, alongside rabbinical supremacy of study, and replaced historical mystical (kabbalistic) and ethical (musar) asceticism and admonishment with Simcha, encouragement, and daily fervor.[2] Hasidism comprises part of contemporary Haredi Judaism, alongside the previous Talmudic Lithuanian-Yeshiva approach and the Sephardi and Mizrahi traditions. Its charismatic mysticism has inspired non-Orthodox Neo-Hasidic thinkers and influenced wider modern Jewish denominations, while its scholarly thought has interested contemporary academic study. Each Hasidic Jews praying in the Hasidic dynasty follows its own principles; thus, Hasidic Judaism is not one movement but a synagogue on Yom Kippur, by collection of separate groups with some commonality. There are approximately 30 larger Hasidic Maurycy Gottlieb groups, and several hundred smaller groups. Though there is no one version of Hasidism, individual Hasidic groups often share with each other underlying philosophy, worship practices, dress (borrowed from local cultures), and songs (borrowed from local cultures).
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Vayakhel- Pikudei
    ב ס ״ ד Torah Wise Of Heart “Let all those Mount Sinai, the only time in all defeat of tragedy: “Wherever it wise of heart come and do”— history when an entire people says ‘and there will be,’ it is a Exodus 35:10. Moses called became the recipients of sign of impending joy.” Weekly revelation. Then came the (Bamidbar Rabbah 13.) At a upon each individual member of the Children of Israel to come disappearance of Moses for his deeper level, though, the opening March 15-21, 2020 forward and use their particular long sojourn at the top of the verse of the sedra alerts us to the 19-25 Adar, 5780 skill (“wisdom”) to build mountain, an absence which led nature of community in Judaism. First Torah: Vayak'hel- to the Israelites’ greatest In classical Hebrew there are Pekudei: Exodus 35:1 - 40:38 the Mishkan—the Second Torah: Parshat desert Tabernacle. collective sin, the making of three different words for Hachodesh: Exodus 12:1-20 The Mishkan was an amazing the golden calf. Moses returned community: edah, tzibbur and ke work of art and engineering, and to the mountain to plead for hillah; and they signify different Haftorah: much wisdom and skill were forgiveness, which was granted. kinds of association. Edah comes Ezekiel 45:18 - 46:15 required to build it. But why does Its symbol was the second set of from the word ed, meaning PARSHAT VAYAK’HEL- he issue a call for the “wise tablets. Now life must begin “witness.” The PEKUDEI of heart”? Is this not a again.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Hasidism: a “Non-Sectarian” Perspective
    Jewish History (2013) 27: 399–434 © The Author(s) 2013. This article is published DOI: 10.1007/s10835-013-9190-x with open access at Springerlink.com Women and Hasidism: A “Non-Sectarian” Perspective MARCIN WODZINSKI´ University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Hasidism has often been defined and viewed as a sect. By implication, if Hasidism was indeed a sect, then membership would have encompassed all the social ties of the “sectari- ans,” including their family ties, thus forcing us to consider their mothers, wives, and daughters as full-fledged female hasidim. In reality, however, women did not become hasidim in their own right, at least not in terms of the categories implied by the definition of Hasidism as a sect. Reconsideration of the logical implications of the identification of Hasidism as a sect leads to a radical re-evaluation of the relationship between the hasidic movement and its female con- stituency, and, by extension, of larger issues concerning the boundaries of Hasidism. Keywords Hasidism · Eastern Europe · Gender · Women · Sectarianism · Family Introduction Beginning with Jewish historiography during the Haskalah period, through Wissenschaft des Judentums, to Dubnow and the national school, scholars have traditionally regarded Hasidism as a sect. This view had its roots in the earliest critiques of Hasidism, first by the mitnagedim and subsequently by the maskilim.1 It attributed to Hasidism the characteristic features of a sect, 1The term kat hahasidim (the sect of hasidim)orkat hamithasedim (the sect of false hasidim or sanctimonious hypocrites) appears often in the anti-hasidic polemics of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bal Tashchit : the Jewish Prohibition Against Needless Destruction Wolff, K.A
    Bal Tashchit : the Jewish prohibition against needless destruction Wolff, K.A. Citation Wolff, K. A. (2009, December 1). Bal Tashchit : the Jewish prohibition against needless destruction. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14448 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14448 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). BAL TASHCHIT: THE JEWISH PROHIBITION AGAINST NEEDLESS DESTRUCTION Copyright © 2009 by K. A. Wolff All rights reserved Printed in Jerusalem BAL TASHCHIT: THE JEWISH PROHIBITION AGAINST NEEDLESS DESTRUCTION Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op dinsdag 1 december 2009 klokke 15:00 uur door Keith A. Wolff geboren te Fort Lauderdale (Verenigde Staten) in 1957 Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof. Dr F.A. de Wolff Prof. Dr A. Wijler, Rabbijn, Jerusalem College of Technology Overige leden: Prof. Dr J.J. Boersema, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof. Dr A. Ellian Prof. Dr R.W. Munk, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof. Dr I.E. Zwiep, Universiteit van Amsterdam To my wife, our children, and our parents Preface This is an interdisciplinary thesis. The second and third chapters focus on classic Jewish texts, commentary and legal responsa, including the original Hebrew and Aramaic, along with translations into English. The remainder of the thesis seeks to integrate principles derived from these Jewish sources with contemporary Western thought, particularly on what might be called 'environmental' themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Succession in Contemporary Hasidism
    1 Succession in Contemporary Hasidism Who Will Lead Us? ZADDIKIM OR REBBES When the modern Hasidic movement fi rst emerged in the late eight- eenth century, it was led mostly by charismatic men, commonly called zaddikim (loosely translated as the saintly or pious), who were them- selves the successors of ba’aley shem (wonder masters of the name of God or healers) and their counterparts, the maggidim (itinerant preach- ers).1 While the ba’aley shem were said to possess the mystical knowl- edge of Kabbalah that enabled them to invoke and in shaman-like fash- ion manipulate powerful, esoteric names of God in order to heal people, do battle with their demons, or liberate the human soul to unify itself with God, powers they used on behalf of those who believed in them, and while the maggidim were powerful preachers and magnetic orators who told tales and off ered parables or sermons that inspired their listen- ers, zaddikim had a combination of these qualities and more. With ba’aley shem they shared a knowledge of how to apply Kabbalah to the practical needs of their followers and to perform “miracles,” using their mystical powers ultimately to help their Hasidim (as these followers became known), and from the maggidim they took the power to inspire and attract with stories and teaching while inserting into these what their devotees took to be personal messages tailored just to them. With both, they shared the authority of charisma. Charisma, Max Weber explained, should be “applied to a certain quality of an individual personality by virtue of which he is set apart 1 HHeilmaneilman - WWhoho WillWill LeadLead Us.inddUs.indd 1 223/03/173/03/17 22:32:32 PPMM 2 | Succession in Contemporary Hasidism from ordinary men and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhu- man, or at least specifi cally exceptional powers or qualities.” 2 Whether the supernatural was an essential aspect of early Hasidism has been debated, but what is almost universally accepted is the idea that the men who became its leaders were viewed by their followers as extraordinary and exceptional.
    [Show full text]
  • Tzadik Righteous One", Pl
    Tzadik righteous one", pl. tzadikim [tsadi" , צדיק :Tzadik/Zadik/Sadiq [tsaˈdik] (Hebrew ,ṣadiqim) is a title in Judaism given to people considered righteous צדיקים [kimˈ such as Biblical figures and later spiritual masters. The root of the word ṣadiq, is ṣ-d- tzedek), which means "justice" or "righteousness". The feminine term for a צדק) q righteous person is tzadeikes/tzaddeket. Tzadik is also the root of the word tzedakah ('charity', literally 'righteousness'). The term tzadik "righteous", and its associated meanings, developed in Rabbinic thought from its Talmudic contrast with hasid ("pious" honorific), to its exploration in Ethical literature, and its esoteric spiritualisation in Kabbalah. Since the late 17th century, in Hasidic Judaism, the institution of the mystical tzadik as a divine channel assumed central importance, combining popularization of (hands- on) Jewish mysticism with social movement for the first time.[1] Adapting former Kabbalistic theosophical terminology, Hasidic thought internalised mystical Joseph interprets Pharaoh's Dream experience, emphasising deveikut attachment to its Rebbe leadership, who embody (Genesis 41:15–41). Of the Biblical and channel the Divine flow of blessing to the world.[2] figures in Judaism, Yosef is customarily called the Tzadik. Where the Patriarchs lived supernally as shepherds, the quality of righteousness contrasts most in Contents Joseph's holiness amidst foreign worldliness. In Kabbalah, Joseph Etymology embodies the Sephirah of Yesod, The nature of the Tzadik the lower descending
    [Show full text]
  • Synagogues, Study-Halls and Chassidic “Shtieblech ”
    The Book Committee Synagogues, Study‐Halls and Chassidic “Shtieblech1” (alphabetically [in Heb.]) As is known, there was a great number of “houses” designated to Torah and prayer in our city. To our great sorrow, details have not been preserved on all of them. Thanks to Mr Mojsze Chaim Tiberg’s great toil, who took the trouble and wearied himself to collect details on the prayer‐houses, the “shtieblech” and minyanim that were and are no more, we are able to add to the articles and lists published in our book, this other list – albeit incomplete – (in order to immortalise, in this manner, their memory and the memory of the innocent and upright ones who worshiped there, who were burned at the stake in the days of horror), and they were these: • Rebbe Reb Awigdor’l Szapiro’s study‐hall and his minyan of followers • “Agudas Yisroel” prayer‐house at ul. Katedralna 13 • “Ahavas Achim” [Brotherly Love] Society’s minyan • “Ohavei Torah” [Torah Lovers] minyan at ul. Ogrodowa 9 • “Ohel Jankew” [Tent of Jacob] Synagogue, Aleja 4 • “Ohel Nuchem” study‐hall • “Achdus Yisroel” [Unity of Israel] Synagogue, ul. Warszawska 3 (the gabay2 – Reb Chaim Leib Jungster) • the Otwock Chassidim shtiebel, on the corner of ul. Krakowska St. and the street of the butcher‐shops [ul. Rzeźnicka] (the gaboim – Reb Aba’le Kaufman and Reb Ziskind) • shtieblech of the Aleksander Chassidim, a.) on Rzeźnicka St., at the Szwiderski house (the gabay – Reb Mojsze Józef Szancer), b.) at the Stary Rynek 13, at the house of Reb Kalman Kromołowski (the gabay – Reb Mendel Biniumin Gelbord) • shtiebel of Amshinov [Mszczonów] Chassidim on ul.
    [Show full text]