DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic, Archived Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historic, Archived Document Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. I l^k^z I SHARE THIS COPY Patent pointers SECURING PATENTS for Department inventions and discoveries is a topic that must be appreciated fully, for unless a carefully planned program of this na- 3 ture is understood and carried out, many : ;:::::::z::r:zjm?^ of the fruits of patient and brilliant research by our fellow wcrkers may be forfeited. As the Department has one 4 V JA ..l/Hiv- • of the largest research organizations in the world, the obtaining of patents is an important supplement to its scien- tific activities. Where community canneries are not You ask "Why should the Department Saving our bounty present, many schools process in their bother to get patents? Is it not suffi- kitchens for the lunch program. Among FOOD PRESERVATION is sponsored by cient simply to disclose its inventions in these are 958 in Ohio, 940 in Michigan, the Food Distribution Branch of the other forms of publications reaching the 833 in Tennessee, 740 in Minnesota, 670 Production and Marketing Administra- public?" The answer is that the object in Wisconsin, and 575 in Iowa. tion. It is geared to prevent waste by of Department research is to benefit the Additional aid in utilizing Govern- helping to find outlets for fruit and vege- public. An invention made as a result ment-donated frozen turkeys, cheese, tables raised locally without waste, and of Department research belongs to the and butter and for preserving fruits and also in cases where the Department finds public, who paid for it through taxation. vegetables has come from the local advisable to handle surplus perish- Hence the public should not be obliged it frozen food locker plants. In promoting ables removed from the market under to pay twice for the same invention. the best use of products supplied for the price-support programs. This work is Double payment like this would be pos- National School Lunch program and carried out under authority of section sible when a Department invention is other direct distribution projects, these 32 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act not patented by the Department itself, 12,000 locker plants have been invalu- revised, which relates to the expansion and thus have the field left open for able. of domestic food markets—especially someone else to take precedence and get All this activity stems from World War when the harvest is bounteous and the a patent on the same invention. Publi- II food preservation campaigns. Can- demand slack. cation of an invention is not a barrier ning centers were set up under the Food Technical help is given in the develop- to the granting of a patent to another, Production War Training program of ment and improvement of nonprofit if the other person's application is filed the Office of Education, with the Depart- community canning centers run by with the U. S. Patent Office within 1 year ment providing much technical guid- communities, schools, and public and of its publication date, and if the appli- ance and financial aid. Today PMA private institutions. Demonstrations, cant can show that he made the inven- personnel continue to provide assistance technological know-how, bulletins and tion prior to the date of the aforesaid to school and community canning plants canning plant layout designs, and publication, even though after the date through the Vocational Education Offi- timely information in all phases of of invention by the author. ces of the State Departments of Educa- sound food-preservation practices are A new revised edition cf the tion. USDA employed in this continuing effort. In Patent Manual is listed as Miscellaneous most cases section 32 food-preservation BAI retirements Publication No. 551. It was drafted of the is carried out jointly work Branch The Personnel Division, Bureau of Animal by W. L. Cheesman, Northern through State agencies concerned with Industry, lists age-required retirements of Regional Research Laboratory, Peoria, noteworthy employees which occur in Janu- operation of such processing plants. 111., T. ary and February. They are Birtwhistle and A. Seegrist, Office of the Arrang^n^nts for using canneries for MacCormack, virus-serum inspection, Kansas Solicitor. It was sponsored by the USDA processing Government-donated prod- City, Kans., Herbert Martin, general investi- gator, New York, N. Y., John H. Muller, live- Committee on Patent Policy consisting ucts are made with the State Distribut- stock inspection, Baltimore, Md., William of 10 authorities from the Agricultural ing Agency and the agency responsible J. J. Pooley, meat inspection, South St. Joseph, Mo., and two meat inspectors, Research Administration, the Produc- for operation of the individual plants. Charles E. Richardson, Kansas City, Kans., tion and Marketing Administration, the Current data show that there are and Edward R. Saunders, St. Louis, Mo. Soil Conservation Service, and the Office about 322 institutional canneries with a Win award jointly of the Solicitor. Write for copies to the total daily capacity of 3,500,000 pounds The Joseph Harvey Gourley award in po- Office of the Solicitor, care of Fred of products in 44 States reporting. mology was made lately to Leon Havis and Mrs. Brooke Meanley (formerly Anna L. Herzer. Many of them have been used to handle Gilkerson), Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, section 32 commodities for eligible and Agricultural Engineering. They were schools and institutions. Besides these honored for research covering fertilizing and pruning peach trees. Nelson transferred plants, approximately 1,600 steam-op- Lewis B. Nelson, soil specialist with the erated community canneries were in Geology award Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agri- operation in 34 States in 1950. More Sterling B. Hendricks, Plant Industry Sta- cultural Engineering, has transferred from tion, Beltsville, Md., received the Arthur L. Port Collins, Colo., to Beltsville, Md., where canneries are use than 500 equipped to Day gold medal recently from the Geological he will supervise research in the relation of glass jars as well as tin containers. Society of America. It was accorded to him different fertilizers to various soil types. A outstanding in the application of native of Idaho, Mr. Nelson was associate More than 75 percent of these plants are for work chemistry and physics to geological prob- professor of soils at Iowa State College be- in the Southeast. lems. fore joining USDA in 1949. 236466°—53 — Death of Dr. Merrill Bulletin builders Extension pioneer Melvin C. Merrill, Ph. D., who retired from the Office of Information in the Department "PARTNERSHIP PLANNING for Popu- December 31, 1949, after a quarter of a MEMORIES OF early day county agri- lar Publications" was the theme of a 3- century as chief of the Division of Publica- cultural agents are timely now because tions, died December 22 at his Washington, day USDA Publications Workshop held D. O, home, after a brief illness. He is of the golden jubilee of farm demon- in Washington late in November and survived by his wife, one daughter, four stration work this year. One such re- grandchildren, and four sisters. Dr. Merrill well over fellow attended by a hundred Depart- was born in April 1884 in Richmond, Utah, a minder comes from a employee ment staff members particularly con- son of a Mormon pioneer and apostle, Mar- who has vivid recollections of the in- riner Merrill, and Maria Kingsbury cerned with publications, including ad- Wood fluence that a pioneer county agent had Merrill. He graduated from Utah State Agri- ministrators, editorial and illustrations cultural College and later earned degrees in in his home community. May we hear people, and some subject-matter work- advanced work at Cornell, University of from others? Chicago, Harvard University, and Washing- ers, and a few State editorial authorities. ton University, St. Louis. After teaching It was during the early part of the First Resulting from the workshop, Director high school, he spent some time directing World War that Dad came home from his the Baguio Experiment Station at Manila, weekly trip to town with the news that we of Information R. L. Webster told the subsequently teaching at Idaho Technical had a county agent, who was telling folks group at the closing session, will be: (1) Institute and serving as head of the Utah that there was a need for most everything State College horticultural department, also that could be produced on our farms. Additional workshops or conferences for We as dean of applied sciences at Brigham Young had been reading about this war need but smaller groups on various phases of pub- University, and in research work at Missouri it took Mr. Holland, our first county agent, Botanical Gardens. During his career in lications work; (2) studies of the effec- to give realism to it. Later on the boys be- USDA, he had charge of the Journal of Agri- ing called up for the draft, and still later, tiveness of publications on the farm and cultural Research, served on the directorate the news of the deaths of John Tully and in the home; (3) increased impetus in of the Graduate School, and helped organize Walter Sewell—close neighbors of ours and was an officer of the OPEDA, or profes- gave impetus to our county agent's plea. the Department's important program of sional employees' unit. He was a member of We were soon trying out new things. We revising out-of-date publications; (4) many leading scientific and professional so- tried out a new variety of corn—the State cieties and fraternities. Just a week prior to College said it would do better than the corn closer cooperation between the Depart- his demise, Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf) on the World District, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, Administration National Capital Region, Wide Web at Either of the Following NY 10278–0090
    3±24±98 Tuesday Vol. 63 No. 56 March 24, 1998 Pages 14019±14328 Briefings on how to use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC, and Salt Lake City, UT, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. Now Available Online via GPO Access Free online access to the official editions of the Federal Register, the Code of Federal Regulations and other Federal Register publications is available on GPO Access, a service of the U.S. Government Printing Office at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html For additional information on GPO Access products, services and access methods, see page II or contact the GPO Access User Support Team via: ★ Phone: toll-free: 1-888-293-6498 ★ Email: [email protected] federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 1998 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 General online information 202±512±1530; 1±888±293±6498 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), Single copies/back copies: by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Paper or fiche 512±1800 Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Register Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and FEDERAL AGENCIES the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Subscriptions: Register (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020Usdaexplanatory Notes –Agricultural Marketing Service
    2020 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE Agency-Wide ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose Statement.....................................................................................................................................................3 Available Funds and Staff Years ............................................................................................................................ 11 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Years ...................................................................................................... 13 Vehicle Fleet ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 Shared Funding Projects ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Account 1: Marketing Services ................................................................................................................................... 17 Appropriations Language........................................................................................................................................ 17 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ................................................................................................................................... 17 Project Statement
    [Show full text]
  • 8–06–04 Vol. 69 No. 151 Friday August 6, 2004 Pages 47763–48128
    8–06–04 Friday Vol. 69 No. 151 August 6, 2004 Pages 47763–48128 VerDate jul 14 2003 22:26 Aug 05, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\06AUWS.LOC 06AUWS i II Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2004 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • State Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and Municipal Ordinances Held Unconstitutional Or Held to Be Preempted by Federal Law
    STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW 2317 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVI- SIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UN- CONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW Three separate lists of Supreme Court decisions appear below: part I lists cases holding state constitutional or statutory provisions unconstitu- tional, part II lists cases holding local laws unconstitutional, and part III lists cases holding that state or local laws are preempted by federal law. As Congress acted as the legislature for the District of Columbia until passage of the Home Rule Act on December 24, 1973, District of Columbia statutes that were enacted by Congress are treated as federal statutes (and included in a prior appendix), and District of Columbia statutes en- acted by the District of Columbia government are treated as state stat- utes. Each case is briefly summarized, and the votes of Justices are indi- cated unless the Court’s decision was unanimous. Justices who write or join the majority or plurality opinion are listed under “Justices concur- ring”, whether or not they write separate concurring opinions, and Jus- tices who do not join the majority or plurality opinion, but write separate opinions concurring in the result, are listed under “Justices specially con- curring.” Previous editions contained only two lists, one for cases holding state laws unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, and one for unconsti- tutional or preempted local laws. The 2002 edition added the third cat- egory because of the different nature of preemption cases. State or local laws held to be preempted by federal law are void not because they con- travene any provision of the Constitution, but rather because they conflict with a federal statute or treaty, and through operation of the Supremacy Clause.
    [Show full text]
  • State Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and Municipal Ordinances Held Unconstitutional Or Held to Be Preempted by Federal Law (1789–2002)
    STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW (1789–2002) 2161 VerDate Aug<04>2004 12:57 Aug 23, 2004 Jkt 077500 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8221 Sfmt 8221 C:\CONAN\CON064.SGM PRFM99 PsN: CON064 VerDate Aug<04>2004 12:57 Aug 23, 2004 Jkt 077500 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 8221 Sfmt 8221 C:\CONAN\CON064.SGM PRFM99 PsN: CON064 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PRO- VISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PRE- EMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW Three separate lists of Supreme Court decisions appear below: part I lists cases holding state constitutional or statutory provisions unconstitu- tional, part II lists cases holding local laws unconstitutional, and part III lists cases holding that state or local laws are preempted by federal law. Each case is briefly summarized, and the votes of Justices are indicated un- less the Court’s decision was unanimous. Previous editions contained only two lists, one for cases holding state laws unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, and one for unconstitutional or preempted local laws. The 2002 edition adds the third category because of the different nature of preemption cases. State or local laws held to be preempted by federal law are void not due to repugnancy with any provision of the Constitution, but rather due to conflict with a federal statute or treaty, and through operation of the Su- premacy Clause. Preemption cases formerly listed in one of the first two cat- egories have been moved to the third. A few cases with multiple holdings are listed in more than one category.
    [Show full text]
  • State Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and Municipal Ordinances Held Unconstitutional Or Held to Be Preempted by Federal Law
    STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW 2377 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVI- SIONS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES HELD UN- CONSTITUTIONAL OR HELD TO BE PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW Three separate lists of Supreme Court decisions appear below: part I lists cases holding state constitutional or statutory provisions unconstitu- tional, part II lists cases holding local laws unconstitutional, and part III lists cases holding that state or local laws are preempted by federal law. As Congress acted as the legislature for the District of Columbia until passage of the Home Rule Act on December 24, 1973, District of Columbia statutes that were enacted by Congress are treated as federal statutes (and included in a prior appendix), and District of Columbia statutes en- acted by the District of Columbia government are treated as state stat- utes. Each case is briefly summarized, and the votes of Justices are indi- cated unless the Court’s decision was unanimous. Justices who write or join the majority or plurality opinion are listed under “Justices concur- ring”, whether or not they write separate concurring opinions, and Jus- tices who do not join the majority or plurality opinion, but write separate opinions concurring in the result, are listed under “Justices specially con- curring.” Previous editions contained only two lists, one for cases holding state laws unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, and one for unconsti- tutional or preempted local laws. The 2002 edition added the third cat- egory because of the different nature of preemption cases. State or local laws held to be preempted by federal law are void not because they con- travene any provision of the Constitution, but rather because they conflict with a federal statute or treaty, and through operation of the Supremacy Clause.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Mechanics: a Financial View
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Tymoigne, Éric Working Paper Monetary mechanics: A financial view Working Paper, No. 799 Provided in Cooperation with: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Suggested Citation: Tymoigne, Éric (2014) : Monetary mechanics: A financial view, Working Paper, No. 799, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/110023 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Working Paper No. 799 Monetary Mechanics: A Financial View by Éric Tymoigne* Levy Economics Institute of Bard College May 2014 * Correspondence: [email protected]. The author thanks John F. Henry, Charles A.E. Goodhart, Yan Liang, Perry Mehrling, and L.
    [Show full text]
  • Valles Caldera National Preserve Land Use History
    More Than a Scenic Mountain Landscape: Valles Caldera National Preserve United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Use History Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-196 September 2007 Kurt F. Anschuetz Thomas Merlan Anschuetz, Kurt F.; Merlan, Thomas. 2007. More than a scenic mountain landscape: Valles Caldera National Preserve land use history. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-196. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 277 p. Abstract This study focuses on the cultural-historical environment of the 88,900-acre (35,560-ha) Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP) over the past four centuries of Spanish, Mexican, and U.S. governance. It includes a review and synthesis of available published and unpublished historical, ethnohistorical, and ethnographic literature about the human occupation of the area now contained within the VCNP. Documents include historical maps, texts, letters, diaries, business records, photographs, land and mineral patents, and court testimony. This study presents a cultural-historical framework of VCNP land use that will be useful to land managers and researchers in assessing the historical ecology of the property. It provides VCNP administrators and agents the cultural-historical background needed to develop management plans that acknowledge traditional associations with the Preserve, and offers managers additional background for structuring and acting on consultations with affiliated communities. The Authors Kurt F. Anschuetz, an archaeologist and anthropologist, is the Program Director of the RÍo Grande Foundation for Communities and Cultural Landscapes in Santa Fe, New Mexico. He provides educational opportunities and technical assistance to Indian, Hispanic, and Anglo communities working to sustain their traditional relations with the land, the water, and their cultural heritage resources in the face of rapid development.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge Impact Plan Environmental Statement and Conservation Comprehensive Draft Deer Flat 13751 Upper Embankment Nampa, ID 83607
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation and Statement Environmental Plan Impact Deer Flat 13751 Upper Embankment Nampa, ID 83607 Phone: 208/467 9278 National Wildlife Refuge Fax: 208/467 1019 Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan http://www.fws.gov/deerflat and Environmental Impact Statement National Wildlife Refuge System Information 1 800/344 WILD Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife Flat National Deer March 2013 The mission of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Cover Photo: Mule deer overlooking refuge Addison Mohler, USFWS March 2013 A Vision of Conservation Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge is enjoyed, appreciated, protected, and treasured as a place where wildlife comes first. The public actively supports and advocates for the Refuge purpose and programs. Residents of the Treasure Valley value the oases of wildlife habitat in their backyard, both at Lake Lowell and the Snake River Islands. The clean, clear waters and lush riparian landscapes of Lake Lowell and the Snake River Islands provide nesting, resting, and feeding habitat for spectacular concentrations of migratory birds and other wildlife. Reductions in disturbance to important nesting, breeding, resting and feeding areas allow wildlife in all Refuge habitats to successfully produce and raise their young thereby sustaining wildlife populations for future generations of Americans to enjoy. The removal of invasive and/or undesirable plant and animal species on the islands of the Snake River and at Lake Lowell provides habitats where songbirds, nesting waterfowl and colonial waterbirds, and native mammals thrive.
    [Show full text]
  • 126613667.23.Pdf
    -44^ Scs.iHi. IS6. SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY FOURTH SERIES VOLUME 20 A Scottish firm in Virginia IV. Cuninghame and Co. A Scottish firm in Virginia 1767-1777 IV. Cuninghame and Co. edited by T. M. Devine, ph.d. ★ ★ EDINBURGH printed for the Scottish History Society by CLARK CONSTABLE (1982) LTD 1984 © Scottish History Society 1984 ISBN o 906245 04 4 Printed in Great Britain L/j PREFACE My primary debt of gratitude is to Lady Catherine Henderson and her son, Mr Martin Henderson of Mosdale, Castle Douglas, Kirkcudbright, the owners of the Cuninghame letterbooks, for permission to allow their publication. I thank them also for their willingness to make the material available to me for study and transcription. Mr Richard Dell of the Strathclyde Regional Archives and Mr John Bates and Dr Frances Shaw of the Scottish Record Office helped in the transfer and supervision of the letterbooks when they were being transcribed and edited. I am particularly grateful to Dr Shaw who first drew my attention to the existence of a third Cuninghame letterbook in the care of Lady Henderson and her son. Professor Jacob M. Price of the University of Michigan kindly read and commented on my introduction. I am pleased to record my thanks also to my former student. Miss Elizabeth Gray, who assisted in the preparation of the material and to Miss Mary McHugh who helped with the index. Mrs J. Struthers transformed a difficult manuscript into typescript with speed and efficiency. My final debt is to Dr Thomas I. Rae for his patient attention and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 144 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 No. 75 Senate The Senate met at 9:45 a.m. and was mittee substitute. Assuming cloture think that is why the majority leader called to order by the President pro fails, the Senate will continue debate was happy to say he will allow the tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. on the tobacco bill. The Senate may Democrats to have sort of a sub- also consider any other legislative or stantive amendment of their own PRAYER executive items that may be cleared choosing, and then we can proceed for- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John for action. Therefore, rollcall votes are ward. But we can work this out. I just Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: possible throughout today's session of wanted to make sure at least that was Almighty God, our purpose is to glo- the Senate. on the record at this time. rify You by serving our Nation. We Several Senators addressed the Mr. SMITH of Oregon. Mr. President, want to express an energetic earnest- Chair. I don't suspect that will be a problem. ness about our work today. Help us to The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. ROB- We are going to check with the chair- know what You want and then want ERTS). The Senator from Massachusetts man and try and accommodate. what we know; to say what we mean, is recognized. f and mean what we say.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the American Economy, 11Th Edition, and Are Available to Qualified Instructors Through the Web Site (
    History of the American Economy This page intentionally left blank History of the American Economy ELEVENTH EDITION GARY M. WALTON University of California, Davis HUGH ROCKOFF Rutgers University History of the American Economy: © 2010, 2005 South-Western, Cengage Learning Eleventh Edition Gary M. Walton and Hugh Rockoff ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any Vice President of Editorial, Business: means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, Jack W. Calhoun recording, taping, Web distribution, information storage and retrieval Acquisitions Editor: Steven Scoble systems, or in any other manner—except as may be permitted by the Managing Developmental Editor: license terms herein. Katie Yanos For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Marketing Specialist: Betty Jung Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706 Marketing Coordinator: Suellen Ruttkay For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all Content Project Manager: Darrell E. Frye requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions Frontlist Buyer, Manufacturing: Further permissions questions can be emailed to Sandee Milewski [email protected] Production Service: Cadmus Package ISBN-13: 978-0-324-78662-0 Sr. Art Director: Michelle Kunkler Package ISBN-10: 0-324-78662-X Internal Designer: Juli Cook Book only ISBN 13: 978-0324-78661-3 Cover Designer: Rose Alcorn Book only ISBN 10: 0-324-78661-1 Cover Images: © Ross Elmi/iStockphoto; South-Western, Cengage Learning © Thinkstock Images 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH 45040 USA Cengage learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.
    [Show full text]