DOCSLIB.ORG

BY Susan T. Miller This Report Is Preliminary and Has Not Been Edited Or Reviewed for Conformity with Geological Survey Standard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BY Susan T. Miller This Report Is Preliminary and Has Not Been Edited Or Reviewed for Conformity with Geological Survey Standard UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND MAMMALIAN BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF A PART OF THE NORTHERN CADY MOUNTAINS, MOJAVE DESERT, CALIFORNIA BY Susan T. Miller OPEN-FILE REPORT 80-878 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey standards and nomenclature Menlo Park, California 1980 CONTENTS Page Abstract——————————————————————————————————————————————————— 1 Introduction—————————————————————————————————————————————————— 2 Previous investigations————————————————————————————————————— 4 Methods and terminology————————————————————————————————————— 6 I Acknowledgements——————————————————————————————————————————— 7 Regional geologic setting———————————————————————————————————————— 8 Descriptive geology———————————————————————————————————————————— 13 Hector formation——————————————————————————————————————————— 13 Stratigraphic nomenclature—————————————————————————————— 13 General features—————————————————————————————————————— 14 Physical stratigraphy of the sedimentary rocks————————————— 18 Tephra-bearing feldspathic and lithic sandstone————————— 18 Mudrock——————————————————————————————————————————— 27 Lenticular conglomerate and sand-bearing conglomerate———— 28 Limestone and calcareous nodules————————————————————— 30 Air-fall tuff—————————————————————————————————————— 31 Petrography and stratigraphy of the basalt unit ———————————— 31 Petrography and stratigraphy of the rhyolite ash-flow tuff unit—————————————————————————————————————————:——— 32 Paleogeographic setting and depositional history———————————— 33 Paleogeographic setting———————————————————————————— 33 Depositional History——————————————————————————————— 36 Age and correlation———————————————————————————————————— 39 Paleogeographic relationship between the northern Cady Mountains and other Miocene sequences in the central Mojave Desert region——————————————————————————————— 46 Younger alluvial units—————————————————————————————————————— 51 Fanglomerate and gravel————————————————————————————————— 51 Older gravel—————————————————————————————————————————— 52 Older alluvium———————————————————————————————————————— 52 Younger alluvium—————————————————————————————————————— 52 Structure———————————————————————————————————————————————— 54 Biostratigraphy of the Hector Formation———————————————————————————— 56 Mammal ages and local faunas————————————————————————————————— 56 Lower Cady Mountains local fauna————————————————————————————— 58 Upper Cady Mountains local fauna————————————————————————————— 61 Summary—————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 64 Systematic paleontology————————————————————————————————————————— 66 Proheteromys sulculus—————————————————————————————————————— 67 Cf. Anchitheriomys? sp.————————————————————————————————————— 71 Tomarctus cf. T. hippophagus————————————————————————————————— 76 Merychippus carrizoensis———————————————————•———————————————— 81 Cf. Diceratherium sp.—————————————————————————————————————— 89 Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. M. (M.) calaminthus——————————————————— 91 Merycodus sp.-————————————————————————————————————————————— 99 Cf. Aepycamelus sp.———————————————————————————————————————— 101 "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis——————————————————————————————————— 105 References cited——————————————————————————————————————————————— 116 II ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1 • Index map——————————————————————————•—————————————— 3 2. Diagram summarizing stratigraphic ranges of ~** key Miocene stratal sequences, Mojave Desert———————————— 5 3. Diagram summarizing areal distribution of major Miocene and(?) latest Oligocene outcrops, Mojave Desert——•——————— 9 4. Generalized columnar section, northern Cady Mountains——————— 15 5. Block diagram of paleogeographic setting, Hector Formation, northern Cady Mountains—————————————————————————————— 16 6-7. Outcrop photographs of Hector Formation showing 6. Sandstone and siltstone, middle unit———————————————— 17 7. Lenticular conglomerate, upper unit————————————————— 17 8. Diagram of major sedimentary rock types, Hector Formation——— 19 9-20. Outcrop photographs of Hector Formation showing 9. Sandstone, siltstone, and mudrock, middle unit————————— 20 10. Poorly indurated and poorly bedded sandstone, upper unit———————————————————————————————————————————— 20 11. Sandstone, upper unit————————————————————————————— 21 12. Sandstone and conglomerate, middle unit——————————————— 21 13. Conglomerate and sandstone, middle unit—————————————— 23 14. Mudrock and siltstone, middle unit—————————————————— 24 15. Conglomerate and sandstone, middle unit——————————————— 25 16. Texturally massive sandstone, middle unit, and basalt unit—————————————————————————————————————————— 25 17. Basalt unit and middle sedimentary unit—————————————— 26 18. Distal facies, middle sedimentary unit——————————————— 26 19. Conglomerate and sandstone, proximal facies, upper unit—— 29 20. Rhyolitic welded ash-flow tuff unit——————————————————— 29 21. Diagram showing correlation of various Miocene sequences, Mojave Desert—————————————————————————————————————— 40 22. Photograph showing relationship of younger alluvial units to older sedimentary units—————————————————————————— 53 23. Diagram showing correlation of various Miocene faunas—————— 57 24. Cf. Anchitheriomys? sp. ——————————————————————————————— 72 25. Cf. Anchitheriomys? sp. ——————————————————————————————— 72 26. Cf. Anchitheriomys? sp. ——————————————————————————————— 73 27. Cf. Anchitheriomys? sp. ——————————————————————————————— 73 28. Tomarctus cf. T. hippophagus———————————————————————————— 77 29. Tomarctus cf. T. hippophagus———————————————————————————— 77 30. Merychippus carrizoensis——————————————————————————————— 82 31. Merychippus carrizoensis——————————————————————————————— 82 32. Merychippus carrizoensis—————————————————————————————— 83 33. Merychippus carrizoensis———————————————-————————————— 83 34. Cf. Diceratherium sp. ————————————————————————————————— 90 35. Cf. Diceratherium sp. ————————————————————————————————— 90 36. Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. MM (M.) calaminthus—————————————— 93 37. Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. M. (M.) calaminthus—————————————— 93 38. Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. M. (M.) calaminthus—————————————— 94 39. Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. M. (M.) calaminthus—————————————— 94 III Illustrations (continued) Page Figure 40. Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. M. (M.) calaminthus————————————— 95 41. Merychyus (Merychyus) cf. M. (M.) calaminthus————————————— 95 * 42. Merycodus sp. ——————————————————————————————————————— 100 43. Cf. Aepycamelus sp. —————————————————————————————————— 102 44. Cf. Aepycamelus sp. —————————————————————————————————— 102 45. Cf. Aepycamelus sp. ———————————————————————————————— 103 46. Cf. Aepycamelus sp. —————————————————————————————————— 103 47. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ——————————————————————————— 106 48. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ———————————————————————————— 106 49. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ——————————————————————————— 107 50 ' "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ——————————————————————————— 107 51. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ——————————————————————————— 108 52. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ——————————————————————————— 108 53. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ————————————————————————————— 109 54. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ———————————————————————————— 109 55. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ————————————————————————————— 110 56. "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis ——————————————————————————— 110 Plate 1. Geologic map —————————————————————————————————————— 14 2. Columnar section, CADY I —————————————————————————————— 31 3. Columnar sections, CADY I la, lib, lie, III ——————————————— 58 4. Columnar sections, CADY IVa, IVb ———————————————————————— 61 5. Locality map -——————————————————————————————————————— 59 6. Fault map, central Mojave Desert——————————————————————— 48 7. Palinspastic Reconstruction, Miocene, central Mojave Desert—— 46 1. All plates are in pocket. Page number is first reference to that plate in the text. IV TABLES Page Table 1. Measurements of Proheteromys sulculus———————————————————— 70 --»* 2. Measurements of Anchitheriomys? sp.—————————————————————— 74 3. Measurements of Tomarctus cf. T. hippophagus——————————————— 79 4* Measurements of Merychippus carrizoensis—————————————————— 86 5. Measurements of Merychyus (Merychyus) calaminthus——————————— 96 6* Measurements of cf. Aepycamelus sp.——————————————————————— 104 7. Measurements of "Miolabis" cf. "M." tenuis————————————————— 112 GEOLOGY AND MAMMALIAN BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF A PART OF THE NORTHERN CADY MOUNTAINS, MOJAVE DESERT, CALIFORNIA By Susan T. Miller ABSTRACT Approximately 1250 ft (381 m) of interbedded basalt, tuff, and volcani- clastic sedimentary rock crop out in the northern Cady Mountains, Mojave Desert, California. These rocks are assigned to the Hector Formation of Woodburne, Tedford, Stevens, and Taylor (1974). Sediments in the Hector Formation accum­ ulated in alluvial and lacustrine depositional environments. These environments occurred in a paleogeographic setting that incorporated a basin-plain complex of lakes, ponds, and marshes; a gently-inclined alluvial plain complex; and a distal alluvial-fan complex. Sediments deposited in these environments lapped onto an erosional surface that was developed on an older volcanic and sedimentary terrain. This terrain provided epiclastic volcanic and granitic constituents to the Hector Formation. Intermittent volcanism of basaltic and rhyolitic composition accompanied deposition of the alluvial/lacustrine sediments. The volcanic events are represented by a basalt flow and a rhyolitic ash-flow tuff, and by beds of vitric air-fall
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of Continental Tertiary Vertebrate Faunas in the Lower Rhine Embayment (NW-Germany)
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81 (2): 177-183 (2002) Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of continental Tertiary vertebrate faunas in the Lower Rhine Embayment (NW-Germany) Th. Mors Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet/Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeozoology, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: October 2000; accepted: January 2002 ^ Abstract This paper discusses the faunal content, the mammal biostratigraphy, and the environmental ecology of three important con­ tinental Tertiary vertebrate faunas from the Lower Rhine Embayment. The sites investigated are Rott (MP 30, Late Oligocene), Hambach 6C (MN 5, Middle Miocene), Frechen and Hambach 11 (both MN 16, Late Pliocene). Comparative analysis of the entire faunas shows the assemblages to exhibit many conformities in their general composition, presumably re­ sulting from their preference for wet lowlands. It appears that very similar environmental conditions for vertebrates reoc- curred during at least 20 Ma although the sites are located in a tectonically active region with high subsidence rates. Differ­ ences in the faunal composition are partly due to local differences in the depositional environment of the sites: lake deposits at the margin of the embayment (Rott), coal swamp and estuarine conditions in the centre of the embayment (Hambach 6C), and flood plain environments with small rivulets (Frechen and Hambach 1 l).The composition of the faunal assemblages (di­ versity and taxonomy) also documents faunal turnovers with extinctions and immigrations (Oligocene/Miocene and post- Middle Miocene), as a result of changing climate conditions. Additional vertebrate faunal data were retrieved from two new assemblages collected from younger strata at the Hambach mine (Hambach 11C and 14).
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltavar Hippotherium: a Mixed Feeding Upper Miocene Hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East- Central Europe)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Beiträge zur Paläontologie Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 30 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kaiser Thomas M., Bernor Raymond L. Artikel/Article: The Baltavar Hippotherium: A mixed feeding Upper Miocene hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East-Central Europe) 241-267 ©Verein zur Förderung der Paläontologie am Institut für Paläontologie, Geozentrum Wien Beitr. Paläont., 30:241-267, Wien 2006 The Baltavar Hippotherium: A mixed feeding Upper Miocene hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East- Central Europe) by Thomas M. Kaiser 1} & Raymond L. Bernor * 2) Kaiser , Th.M. & B ernor , R.L., 2006. The Baltavar Hippotherium. A mixed feeding Upper Miocene hipparion (Equidae, Perissodactyla) from Hungary (East-Central Europe). — Beitr. Palaont., 30:241-267, Wien. Abstract browse ratio of 50/50% in its diet. The impala lives in tropi­ cal east Africa in grass dominated open environments like The genus Hippotherium evolved in Central and Western bushland and Acacia savannahs but also in Acacia forests Europe following the “Hipparion Datum” and is particu­ and other deciduous woodlands. It further has one of the larly remarkable for its complexly ornamented enamel pli­ most abrasive diets among extant mixed feeders and is con­ cations on the maxillary and mandibular cheek teeth. The sistently classified next to the grazers in mesowear evalu­ Baltavar hipparion assemblage is of importance because it ation. The comparatively abrasive diet of H. “microdon” represents one of the latest known populations of Central suggests the presence of grass or other abrasive vegetation European Hippotherium. The Baltavar fauna accumulated in the Baltavar paleohabitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Oreodonts of the Tick Canyon Formation , Southern California
    PALE0B10s Contributions from the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley No. I June 15, 1967 OREODONTS OF THE TICK CANYON FORMATION , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA by David P. Whistler OREODONTS OF THE TICK CANYON FORMATION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DAVID P. WHISTLER In 1940, Richard H. Jahns reviewed the stratigraphy of the nonmarine Mint Canyon Formation in the eastern part of the Ventura Basin and separated from it a new formation and fauna. Previous to this work, a controversy existed as to the age of the Mint Canyon Formation, for it contained vertebrates considered indicative of both the Miocene and Pliocene (Kew, 1924, Maxson, 1930, and Stirton, 1933). As a partial solut,ion to this controversy, Jahns demonstrated the presence of an erosional unconformity low in the nonmarine sequence which indicated a shift in source area. He redefined the beds below the unconformity as the Tick Canyon Formation (Jahns, 1940, pp. 163-66). Additional fossils discovered in the Tick Canyon Formation since Maxson's work, and certain of the forms described by Maxson, comprise the Tick Canyon fauna. Only two specimens described by Maxson are from the Tick Canyon Formation, UCMP 30046, the type of Miolabis californicus and UCMP 23852, a dentary fragment of a Parahippus. Neither of these permitted a definitive age determination. The additional fauna described by Jahns indicates an Arikareean mammalian age (early Miocene), and there is a noteworthy temporal hiatus between the Tick Canyon fauna and the over­ lying Mint Canyon fauna. In addition, faunas comprising three mammalian ages, late Barstovian, and earlier and late Clarendonian, are now recognized from the Mint Canyon Formation, but this is not the principal concern of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando
    Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando To cite this version: Pablo Librado, Ludovic Orlando. Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, Annual Reviews, 2021, 9 (1), 10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118. hal- 03030307 HAL Id: hal-03030307 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03030307 Submitted on 30 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2021. 9:X–X https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-061220-023118 Copyright © 2021 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Librado Orlando www.annualreviews.org Equid Genomics and Evolution Genomics and the Evolutionary History of Equids Pablo Librado and Ludovic Orlando Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie Moléculaire et d’Imagerie de Synthèse, CNRS UMR 5288, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31000, France; email: [email protected] Keywords equid, horse, evolution, donkey, ancient DNA, population genomics Abstract The equid family contains only one single extant genus, Equus, including seven living species grouped into horses on the one hand and zebras and asses on the other. In contrast, the equine fossil record shows that an extraordinarily richer diversity existed in the past and provides multiple examples of a highly dynamic evolution punctuated by several waves of explosive radiations and extinctions, cross-continental migrations, and local adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March
    March 2011 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PROJECT NUMBER: 115244 PROJECT CONTACT: MIKE STRAND EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2710 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PREPARED FOR: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 NORTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 DEPARTMENT OF PALEOSERVICES SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PO BOX 121390 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 ANA 032-030 (PER-02) LADWP (MARCH 2011) SB 115244 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Construction of New 230 kV Double-Circuit Transmission Line ........................................ 4 1.2.2 Addition of New 230 kV Circuit ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Reconductoring of Existing Transmission Line .................................................................. 14 1.2.4 Construction of New Switching Station .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the TICK CANYON AREA May 23, 1952
    GEOLOGY OF THE TICK CANYON AREA J. Richard Woodcock California Institute of ·rechnology May 23, 1952 Table of Cantents. Abstract •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 Introdttction . • . • . • . • • . • • . • . • . • • • . • . • • • . • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • L. Aknowledgm.ents • • •• • • • ••••••••••• • •• e ••••••••••••••• • •••••••• • ••••••• • • 5 General Geography••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6 Statigraphy and Lithology ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 Basement Complex •••••••••••••·••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••· 9 Vasq.uez FO:rmation • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 General (Vasquez Formation) ...................................... 19 Tick Canyon Formation .............•.....•..••.•..•............•.. 19 Mint Canyon Formation ............................................ 20 Whonoz Formation ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 20 General (Tick Canyon and Mint Canyon Formations) ................. 21 Structure ............................................................. 22 Geomorphology••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••·•••••••••••••••••••••• 2L Drainage • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • . • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 2 h Relief ........................................................... 24 Geologic History •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 Illustrations: Figure: 1. Index l~p •••••••••••••••·•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook Contains Preliminary Findings of a Number of Concurrent Projects Being Worked on by the Trip Leaders
    TH FRIENDS OF THE PLEISTOCENE, ROCKY MOUNTAIN-CELL, 45 FIELD CONFERENCE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE ALBUQUERQUE BASIN OCTOBER 12-14, 2001 SEAN D. CONNELL New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources-Albuquerque Office, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2808 Central Ave. SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 DAVID W. LOVE New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 JOHN D. SORRELL Tribal Hydrologist, Pueblo of Isleta, P.O. Box 1270, Isleta, NM 87022 J. BRUCE J. HARRISON Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 Open-File Report 454C and D Initial Release: October 11, 2001 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 NMBGMR OFR454 C & D INTRODUCTION This field-guide accompanies the 45th annual Rocky Mountain Cell of the Friends of the Pleistocene (FOP), held at Isleta Lakes, New Mexico. The Friends of the Pleistocene is an informal gathering of Quaternary geologists, geomorphologists, and pedologists who meet annually in the field. The field guide has been separated into two parts. Part C (open-file report 454C) contains the three-days of road logs and stop descriptions. Part D (open-file report 454D) contains a collection of mini-papers relevant to field-trip stops. This field guide is a companion to open-file report 454A and 454B, which accompanied a field trip for the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain/South Central Section of the Geological Society of America, held in Albuquerque in late April.
    [Show full text]
  • 18-Prothero Et Al (Massacre).P65
    Lucas et al., eds., 2008, Neogene Mammals. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 44. 239 MAGNETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE MASSACRE LAKE BEDS (LATE HEMINGFORDIAN, EARLY MIOCENE), NORTHWEST NEVADA, AND THE AGE OF THE “PROBOSCIDEAN DATUM” IN NORTH AMERICA DONALD R. PROTHERO1, EDWARD BYRD DAVIS2 AND SAMANTHA S.B. HOPKINS2 1 Department of Geology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041; 2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 Abstract—The “Proboscidean Datum” was proposed by Tedford et al. (1987) and Woodburne and Swisher (1995) as a marker of the late Barstovian (middle Miocene, about 14.5 Ma) in North America. Subsequently, a number of pre-late Barstovian proboscidean fossils have been reported, casting doubt on the validity of the Proboscidean Datum. The oldest of these is from the late Hemingfordian Massacre Lake local fauna of northwest Nevada, which produced a single proboscidean tooth fragment. Magnetic stratigraphy was conducted on these beds, which yielded a stable remanence held mainly in magnetite that was entirely reversed in polarity. Based on the 40Ar/39Ar date of 16.474 ±0.035 Ma at the top of the section, we correlate the Massacre Lake beds with earliest Chron C5Cr (16.4-17.3 Ma). In addition, a number of other early Barstovian magnetostratigraphic sections with Proboscidea are reviewed, and quite a few yield fossils that date between 15.8 and 16.2 Ma. Our analysis of faunal data suggests that these early occurrences are simply the first places colonized by the immigrating proboscideans and not marked by a unique ecological or taphonomic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Miocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Central Great Plains from Stable Carbon Isotopes in Large Mammals Willow H
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Sciences 7-2017 Middle Miocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Central Great Plains from Stable Carbon Isotopes in Large Mammals Willow H. Nguy University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss Part of the Geology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Nguy, Willow H., "Middle Miocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Central Great Plains from Stable Carbon Isotopes in Large Mammals" (2017). Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 91. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MIDDLE MIOCENE PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS FROM STABLE CARBON ISOTOPES IN LARGE MAMMALS by Willow H. Nguy A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Ross Secord Lincoln, Nebraska July, 2017 MIDDLE MIOCENE PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS FROM STABLE CARBON ISOTOPES IN LARGE MAMMALS Willow H. Nguy, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2017 Advisor: Ross Secord Middle Miocene (18-12 Mya) mammalian faunas of the North American Great Plains contained a much higher diversity of apparent browsers than any modern biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Rewilding with Camelids
    Journal of Arid Environments 130 (2016) 54e61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Arid Environments journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaridenv Prospects for rewilding with camelids Meredith Root-Bernstein a, b, *, Jens-Christian Svenning a a Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark b Institute for Ecology and Biodiversity, Santiago, Chile article info abstract Article history: The wild camelids wild Bactrian camel (Camelus ferus), guanaco (Lama guanicoe), and vicuna~ (Vicugna Received 12 August 2015 vicugna) as well as their domestic relatives llama (Lama glama), alpaca (Vicugna pacos), dromedary Received in revised form (Camelus dromedarius) and domestic Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) may be good candidates for 20 November 2015 rewilding, either as proxy species for extinct camelids or other herbivores, or as reintroductions to their Accepted 23 March 2016 former ranges. Camels were among the first species recommended for Pleistocene rewilding. Camelids have been abundant and widely distributed since the mid-Cenozoic and were among the first species recommended for Pleistocene rewilding. They show a range of adaptations to dry and marginal habitats, keywords: Camelids and have been found in deserts, grasslands and savannas throughout paleohistory. Camelids have also Camel developed close relationships with pastoralist and farming cultures wherever they occur. We review the Guanaco evolutionary and paleoecological history of extinct and extant camelids, and then discuss their potential Llama ecological roles within rewilding projects for deserts, grasslands and savannas. The functional ecosystem Rewilding ecology of camelids has not been well researched, and we highlight functions that camelids are likely to Vicuna~ have, but which require further study.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated List of the Fishes of Nevada
    14 June 1984 PROC. BIOL. SOC. WASH. 97(1), 1984, pp. 103-118 ANNOTATED LIST OF THE FISHES OF NEVADA James E. Deacon and Jack E. Williams Abstract.-160 native and introduced fishes referable to 108 species, 56 genera, and 19 families are recorded for Nevada. The increasing proportion of introduced fishes continues to burden the native ichthyofauna. The first list of all fishes known from Nevada by La Rivers and Trelease (1952) eventually culminated in La Rivers' Fishes and Fisheries of Nevada, published in 1962. Over the past twenty years, a number of changes have occurred in the fish fauna of the state. These include additions through "official" actions as well as by "unofficial" means. Some taxa have become extinct and many have become much less abundant (Deacon 1979, Deacon et al. 1979). Numerous changes have also occurred in our understanding of probable taxonomic relationships of the fishes. The increased number of subspecies recognized since the 1962 list reflects a better understanding of distribution and geographic variation of the ichthyo- fauna. Our purpose is to produce a checklist that includes all taxa known from the state within historical times. The list includes all fishes native to Nevada and those that have been introduced into the state, whether or not they have become established. Our checklist reflects current understanding of the fauna and high- lights those areas where additional work is needed. Including subspecies, we record 160 fishes in the present fauna of Nevada referable to 108 species, 56 genera, and 19 families. We recognize 67 subspecies referable to 15 species.
    [Show full text]