DOCSLIB.ORG

Weavetech Archive 0105

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weavetech Archive 0105 WeaveTech Archive 0105 From [email protected] Tue May 1 07:22:01 2001 Return-Path: [email protected] Received: from localhost (ralph@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.8.7/ 8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA25762 for <ralph@localhost>; Tue, 1 May 2001 07:22:00 -0700 From: [email protected] Received: from bas by fetchmail-4.5.8 IMAP for <ralph/localhost> (single-drop); Tue, 01 May 2001 07:22:00 MST Received: from optima.CS.Arizona.EDU (optima.CS.Arizona.EDU [192.12.69.5]) by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f41AWd309117 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 May 2001 03:32:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from outmta016.topica.com (outmta016.topica.com [206.132.75.233]) by optima.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f41ASmc11483 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 May 2001 03:28:49 -0700 (MST) To: [email protected] Subject: Digest for [email protected], issue 775 Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 03:32:07 -0700 Message-ID: <[email protected]> X-Topica-Loop: 700002588 List-Help: <http://topica.com/lists/weavetech/> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Archive: <http://topica.com/lists/weavetech/read> Status: R -- Topica Digest -- apologies By [email protected] Re:denting By [email protected] double width double weave auto advance problem By [email protected] Re: linen sett By [email protected] Re: double width double weave auto advance problem By [email protected] Re: linen sett By [email protected] Pattern and Loom By [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 07:29:58 -0400 From: Ruth Blau <[email protected]> Subject: apologies I have been informed that the message I sent reposting Martha Hubbard's info on creating a cross on an AVL warping wheel came through to the list in html. I have to assume that this was the result of copying Martha's msg from the Topica website and pasting into my message. My mail reader is definitely set so that it doesn't send in html. My apologies to all for whom this created a bunch of garbage. Ruth - 1 - WeaveTech Archive 0105 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:31:48 -0400 From: Barbara Nathans <[email protected]> Subject: Re:denting In relation to Amanda's question about linen, I wonder if there are some specific experiences with denting and reed marks. I've discovered that I ordered my fine reeds too long to fit my beater ( trying to get every last centimeter out of loom width), and wound up denting 10/2 mercerized cotton 4/ in a 6 dent reed, with much scepticism before I ordered another reed.. I'm copying Alice Schlein' s gorgeous turned twill tea towels, and the pattern falls nicely into the denting. The reed marks washed out of the twill part of my sample : the plain weave, I'm not so sure, so I won't use any plain on these. I much prefer to use larger spaced reeds--it's easier to see, and puts less wear on some yarns. Any advice on this general topic? I've read Fannin's general comments. Barbara Nathans Bellport, Long Island, New York ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:03:12 -0700 From: Rosemarie Dion <[email protected]> Subject: double width double weave auto advance problem Hello fellow weavers, Once again I come to you for an answer to my dwdw problems. I believe I have mastered the fold problem, now I am ready to do a larger piece and can't get my auto advance to work properly. Because I am doing the double width the advance leaves a streak, I have tried various wheels, different settings etc. following all the rules for normal auto advance procedures (I never had this problem with regular weaving). Have any of you had this problem when you wove dwdw? What did you do to solve it? Must I forgo using the auto advance? Blankets are such large projects I would like the security of a steady automated beat. 60 in AVL production compu-dobby loom, 16 shafts (all in use for this twill double width double weave design). 20 epi (10 epi per layer), 4/2 cotton warp, same thickness wool weft. Thank you, Rosemarie in San Diego ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:14:42 -0700 From: Alcorn <[email protected]> Subject: Re: linen sett >Any suggestions from those of you who have woven with this size linen? I have woven with 60/2 and 80/2 linen and had no reed marks. No matter what the size of any warp you should ALWAYS do a wrap around a ruler to determine the grist and then the sett. {Even yarns of the same size can wrap differently.} I use the formula towards the back of Zetterstrom's, "Manual of Swedish Handweaving." Seeing as huck should be sett towards the looser side of plain weave, I would say that 48 epi is much too tight. - 2 - WeaveTech Archive 0105 Use some of your warp yarn to determine the proper sett and then resley. It won't matter that much if the width in the reed doesn't match the width on the warp beam. When I am weaving linen I try to have just two ends per dent and have never fretted about splitting a huck motif. You probably dont have an 18 dent reed to give the two ends per dent, so try to sley evenly at say 3 epi in a 12 dent reed. Francie Alcorn ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:16:21 -0400 From: "55wmt" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: double width double weave auto advance problem Rosemarie, Try this: tie a string to the upper hook of the auto advance; beat one layer using the auto adv. then throw the other pick and before you beat pull the string to lift the hook so that the auto adv. won't advance. This comes in handy for overshot, too. Angie Rockett, Manchester, CT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rosemarie Dion" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:03 AM Subject: double width double weave auto advance problem > Hello fellow weavers, > Once again I come to you for an answer to my dwdw problems. I believe I > have mastered the fold problem, now I am ready to do a larger piece and > can't get my auto advance to work properly. Because I am doing the > double width the advance leaves a streak, I have tried various wheels, > different settings etc. following all the rules for normal auto advance > procedures (I never had this problem with regular weaving). Have any of > you had this problem when you wove dwdw? What did you do to solve it? > Must I forgo using the auto advance? Blankets are such large projects I > would like the security of a steady automated beat. > > 60 in AVL production compu-dobby loom, 16 shafts (all in use for this > twill double width double weave design). 20 epi (10 epi per layer), 4/2 > cotton warp, same thickness wool weft. > > Thank you, > Rosemarie in San Diego > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:34:06 -0700 From: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: linen sett > But the master spreadsheet indicates that good setts for this > yarn are 36/40/48 I checked and yes indeed it does! Then I checked using Ashenhurst which resulted in 29, 38, 49--reasonably consistent. (Sigh of relief--I was fearing that I'd mistyped something in the MOA spreadsheet.) - 3 - WeaveTech Archive 0105 So let's review the process. First we determine a yarn diameter . This can be done with reasonable accuracy by a calculation method (Ashenhurst is included in MOA spreadsheet--but there are others and ones more accurate(btw, 70/2 linen at 10,500 ypp provides a density of 94)). You can determine a less accurate (consistent) yarn diameter by wrapping. As the yarn flattens while wrapping, the number of threads in a given inch are fewer and this discrepancy needs to be taken into account when making further calculations such as sett (next paragraph), twist angle, etc. Sett is estimated by dividing the number of warp ends in a repeat of weave by the number of warp ends plus the number of weft intersections, then multiplying this by the yarn diameters in one inch. E.g., plain weave where Ashenhurst has determined 16 threads in an inch: 2/4 = 1/2 x 16 = 8 The number of warp ends in a repeat is 2, the number warp ends plus the number of weft intersections is 4 (2 + 2). Therefore the sett is 1/2 times the yarn diameter resulting in 8. Now the waffling comes in--if the yarn diameter is calculated using Ashenhurst, the formula provides a *maximum* sett, in other words stiff as a board. With Ashenhurst we must multiply the result (8 above) by a factor depending on the end purpose of the fabric (60-80% for clothing; 50-60% for scarves . .). If you use wrapping you'll have to do a more sampling as wrapping is subject to human vagaries. So back to your problem. The suggested setts of 36/40/48 (or are for loose, plain weave, twill (in that order). As I'd want huck in a loose structure I'd go for 36-38. Margaret ------------------------------------------------------------------- [email protected] Tucson, AZ USA ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:32:59 -0500 From: "Aaron and Carolyn Gritzmaker" <[email protected]> Subject: Pattern and Loom For anyone interested, there are two copies of Pattern and Loom by John Becker for sale on www.Bookfinder.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12Th International Conference on Goats – Book of Abstract
    Book of Abstracts Antalya, Turkey 25-30th September, 2016 Organised by Book of Abstracts of 12th International Conference on Goats “ICG 2016” Publisher : ARBER Professional Congress Services E-Book Layout : Ayşenur AYTAÇ Composition : Tolga KOÇ Submission and evaluation process wa handled by MeetingHand The organizers do not have any legal liability for to contents of the abstract SUPPORTED BY SPONSORS Daşkıran, İ., Chair Doğan, E. Önenç, A. Koluman, N., Co-Chair Elmaz, Ö. Öztürk, Z. Arsoy,D. Gül, S. Savran, F. Biçer, O. Kılınç, H. Şahinler, Ü. Bingöl, M. Konyalı, A. Şirin, E. Çakır, H. Ocak, S Tekerli, M. Cemal, İ. Ogün, S. Türer, Ö. Yılmaz, O. TABLE OF CONTENT ORAL PRESENTATION The Future of The Dairy Goat Industry in Coming Decades in Different Climatic Zone in Light of Climatic Changes Nissim Silanikove ............................................................................................................................................... 1 The FAO/OIE Global Control and Eradication Strategy for peste des petits ruminants (PPR): A momentous development for the world’s goat keepers David Sherman ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Thinking Outside of the Box – Innovations Solutions for Dairy Goat Management Carol Delaney ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Goat Productıon Systems of Turkey: From Nomadıc
    [Show full text]
  • In the Garment & Leather Manufacturing Sector in Jordan
    Skills for Trade and Economic Diversification (STED) in the Garment & Leather Manufacturing Sector In Jordan Skills for Trade and Economic Diversification (STED) in the Garment & Leather Manufacturing Sector In Jordan 3 Copyright © International Labour Organization 2020 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions) at the below address or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ______________________________________________________________________________ ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data Skills for trade and economic diversification (STED): Garment and leather manufacturing sector Jordan / ILO Regional Office for Arab States - Beirut: ILO, 2020 Web PDF: 9789220328958 ILO Regional Office for Arab States ______________________________________________________________________________ The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabric Glossary Listed Below Are Basic Definitions of Some of the More Common Terms Used to Describe Fabric Within the Bedding Industry
    Expert Advice. Premium Products. Everyday Deep Discounts. 51260 Van Dyke Shelby Township, MI 48316 586-580-3605 Web Site: www.matt-to-go.com Email: [email protected] Fabric Glossary Listed below are basic definitions of some of the more common terms used to describe fabric within the bedding industry. Absorbency - The ability of a fabric to take in moisture. Absorbency is a very important property, which affects many other characteristics such as skin comfort, static build-up, shrinkage, stain removal, water repellency, and wrinkle recovery. Baffling - A “baffled” construction has fabric walls sewn between the top and bottom of the comforter cover, which both prevents the down from shifting and allows the down to fully loft. Batting - Cotton, wool, or synthetic fiber used for stuffing furniture and mattresses and for lining comforters. Blend - A term applied to a yarn of a fabric that is made up of more than one fiber. In blended yarns, two or more different types of staple fibers are twisted or spun together to form the yarn. An example of a typical blended yarn or fabric is polyester/cotton. Calendering - A process for finishing fabrics in which such special effects as high luster, glazing, embossing, and moiré are produced. Cellulose - A material derived from the cell walls of certain plants. Cellulose is used in the production of many vegetable fibers, as well as being the major raw material component used in the production of the manufactured fibers of acetate, rayon, and triacetate. CFM - Cubic feet per minute per square meter (CFM) is a measure of the air permeability of a fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Spun Yarn Diameter: On-Line Control and Analysis of Count David K
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2010 Optical Spun Yarn Diameter: On-Line Control and Analysis of Count David K. Kurgatt Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HUMAN SCIENCES OPTICAL SPUN YARN DIAMETER: ON-LINE CONTROL AND ANALYSIS OF COUNT By DAVID K. KURGATT A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Retail Merchandising and Product Development in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy A Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2010 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of David K. Kurgatt defended on October 11, 2010. Mary Ann Moore Professor Directing Dissertation Eric Chicken University Representative Pauline Sullivan Committee Member Jeanne Heitmeyer Committee Member Elizabeth Goldsmith Committee Member Approved: Mary Ann Moore, Interim Chair, Department of Retail Merchandising and Product Development Billie J. Collier, Dean, College of Human Sciences The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named committee members. I dedicate this study to my late father, John Cheres Arap Sang, my friend and teacher of many years and to my late grandmother, Mariah Tabutany for her love and strong commitment to family. I also dedicate this study to my mother, Grace Tabelgaa Sang for her love and patience during the many years of my studies and overseas travels. Finally yet importantly, I dedicate this study to my wife Subashri Kurgatt, my son Charles Kipkorir Kurgatt and my daughter Stefanie Chepkoech Kurgatt for their love, encouragement and patience.
    [Show full text]
  • 5–15–03 Vol. 68 No. 94 Thursday May 15, 2003 Pages 26201–26456
    5–15–03 Thursday Vol. 68 No. 94 May 15, 2003 Pages 26201–26456 VerDate Jan 31 2003 18:42 May 14, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\15MYWS.LOC 15MYWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2003 The FEDERAL REGISTER is published daily, Monday through SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, PUBLIC Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Subscriptions: Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Weight/Chief Value
    ~3_. ... l .- ·:;. •:');- ., . ., _.,_, i , : . : ;. ;,<. .. -~ .:, ... : .~. .. ; . ·~' .. ·- ...... ~ .. ( .... ·."' -._ : ... ..:. ·.· · . ....... f ·.~·,;· : . -Kenneth R. Mason, Secretary to the Commission :. ..·., ~ .;.. ../.·_'. ·: .. •, ~ . ·. ~ ·. ,.;,._ ·'l.: :·:Larry B. ·c1ayton and Robert W. Wallace,' Textiles, . ':..;:.. · ·"Leather Products, ·and Apparel Division }'!Eugene A. ·Rosengarden, ·Holm J. Kappler,. and George Weise, ·; ... :.'./Office of Nomenclature, Valuation, and Related Activities . ~. .. ' ' . ' ·' ' - . ~... , . ... , '._r,:1 ~~~-~ ·.~ .. ... ·. ~! .. .;'~:.· "'"":' ......... ·;·i ~ .. \~: .'?····.··· '. .. .... : ........ ~ :·:..... .·• ~~-·. .J ... Address all communications to : .. :._~·.;..,..... .,. ·_United States International T·rade Commission .· ... Washington, D. C. 20436 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436 OFFICE OF' THE SECRETARY April 22, 1977 To whom it may concern: In the interest of providing more productive hearings in the investigation of the probable domestic impact of changing from the current "chief value" method of classifying textile imports to a "chief weight" method for classifying such imports (inv. No. 332-82), the United States Interna­ tional Trade Commission is making public its staff prehearing report to the Commission on the investigation. The staff prehearing report should provide interested parties with information that lo.Till·; in the event they choose to appear at the Commission's hearings or to submit briefs to the Commission, provide a better basis for information to be presented in the testimony or briefs. In view of this newly available information you are invited. to appear at any of the Commission's hearings or to submit briefs to the Commission on this subject. The public hearings in connection with the investigation will be held in Charlotte, N.C., on April 26, 1977, New York, N.Y., on May 10, 1977, Los Angeles, Calif., on May 24, 1977, and Washington, D.C., on June 7, 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Fashion Merchandising. Marketing and Distributive Education. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 276 466 i7C 860 583 AUTHOR Robertson, Horace C.; And Others TITLE Fashion Merchandising. Marketing and Distributive Education. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleighriv. of Vocational Education. REPORT NO VEC-MD-CG-7271; VEC-MDE-CTIB-7271 PUB_DATE [85] NOTE 657p.; This reprint is a product of the Vocational Instructional Materials Acquisition System located Florida State University. PUB TYPE Guid*: Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF03/PC27 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Clothing Instruction; Community Colleges; *Course Content; Curriculum Design; *Distributive Education; *Fashion Industry; Instructional Materials; *Merchandising; Teaching Guides; Two Year Colleges ABSTRACT This_curriculum guide was developed to be used asa resource guide_to assist marketing and distributive education teachers in planning and teaching a course in fashion merchandising. First, an introductory section is devoted to the management of the fashion merchandising curriculum, including informationon ths guide's background, units of instruction, competencies, format, instructional planning, instructiona delivery,_evaluation and feedback. Next, the guide presents the following teaching units:_(1) Overview of the rashion_Industry; Communications_in Marketing; (3) Merchandise Information for Fashion Merchandising; (4) Personal Selling; (5) Merchandising Operations; (6) Sales Promotion; and (7) Employment Skills. Each unit includes a broad course outline,1 which provides competencies and objectives
    [Show full text]
  • I Andrea L. Hirst I Brookstone Company, Inc. I One Innovation
    • NAME IA ndrea L. Hirst I FIRM NAM E I Brookstone Company, Inc. I · STREET IO ne Innovation Way I · cnY IMe rrimack l • STATE New Hampshire (Required for U.S. applicants) I · c o UNTRY IU nited States I · ZIP/POSTAL CODE 03054 I PHONE 1603-577-8274 I FA.,'( 1603-577-8011 I • EMAIL ADDRESS [email protected] I · AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes FEE INFORM ATION NUMBER OF CLASSES 2 FEE PER CLASS 275 • TOTAL FEE PAID 550 SIGNATURE INFORMATION • SIGNATURE I1 andrea 1 hirst 55269/ • SIGNATORY'S NAME I Andrea L. Hirst • SIGNATORY'S POSITION I Asst. General Counsel, IP • DATE SIGNED I 12/08/2009 PTO Form 1478 (Rev 912006) OMB No. 0651-0009 (Exp 1213112011) Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register TEAS Plus Application Serial Number: 77889099 Filing Date: 12/08/2009 To the Commissioner for Trademarks: MARK: better than Down (stylized and/or with design, see mark) The literal element of the mark consists of better than Down. The applicant is not claiming color as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a silhouette of a duck between the words "better than" and "Down" wherein the words are printed in a stylized font. The applicant, Brookstone Purchasing, Inc., a corporation of New Hampshire, having an address of One Innovation Way Merrimack, New Hampshire 03054 United States requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register established by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section 1051 et seq.), as amended, for the following: For specific filing basis information for each item, you must view the display within the Input Table.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Regulations Under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939
    [Billing Code: 6750-01-S] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 300 [RIN 3084-AB29] RULES AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE WOOL PRODUCTS LABELING ACT OF 1939 AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Commission amends its rules and regulations under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 (“Wool Rules” or “Rules”) to: (1) conform to the requirements of the Wool Suit Fabric Labeling Fairness and International Standards Conforming Act, which revised the labeling requirements for cashmere and certain other wool products; and (2) align with the amended rules and regulations under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act (“Textile Rules”). DATES: The amended Rules are effective on [insert date 30 days after publication in FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert M. Frisby, Attorney, (202) 326-2098, Federal Trade Commission, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. INTRODUCTION As part of its ongoing regulatory review program, the Commission published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Request for Public Comment (“ANPR”) in January 20121 seeking comment on the economic impact of, and the continuing need for, the Wool Rules. The ANPR sought comment generally on the Rules’ benefits to consumers and burdens on businesses. It also asked about specific issues, including how to modify the Rules to implement the Wool Suit Fabric Labeling Fairness and International Standards Conforming Act (“Conforming Act”),2
    [Show full text]
  • San Fernando a the Si S Submi Tt Ed in Par Ti Al Sati S
    l San Fernando Valley Stat e College TWO ASPECTS OF STUDENT NEED II FOR TEXTILE PHODUCT INFORMATION A the sis submi tted in partial satis£action of the requi reme nt s for th'e " degree of Ma!ster of Science in : ! tf} Ho me Economi cs by Dorothy c. Blackman January, 1972 I The thesis of Doro thy c. Blackman is approved : San Fernando Val ley State College January, 1971 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to express my gratitude to Dr. Marjory L. Joseph, Mrs . Betty J. Bailey , and Dr . Richard F. Campbell £or their assistance and criticism during the preparation o£ thi s study . A special note o£ appreciation go es to Mrs. Louise sutton £o r her encouragement and co op eration in pre- testing questionnaires. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ' • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii i LI ST OF TABLES vi ABSTRACT vii CHA P1'ER I. INTRODUCTION 1 Statement of the Problem 1 Purpo se of the study 2 Importance of the Study J Nature of the Study 4 Assumptions 4 Limitations 5 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 6 Th eo ry of Cognitive Di ssonance 6 Leg al Label ing Requirements 11 Regulations and Congres sional Acts ll Premature Market ing In novations , .. 14 Incompatible Combinations 15 Educating the Consumer 16 Lab el ing 17 Industry, Government Co mmun ic ation with the co nsu mer 25 w'h en , r.-l�ercl, How Co nsumer Can Learn JO Home Economists� Role in Consumer Affairs Jl Consumer Education - Life- Span Concept J6 III. METHODS OF INVESTIGATI ON J9 The Sampl e 39 The Ques t ionnaires J9 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • The AMERICAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY • COMPETITION • STRUCTURE • FACILITIES • COSTS
    The AMERICAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY • COMPETITION • STRUCTURE • FACILITIES • COSTS By L.D. Howell Agricultural Economist Economic Research Service Marketing Economics Division Issued November 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE »WASHINGTON, D.C. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. (Jovernment Printing Office Washington, D.C, 20402 - Price 75 cents PREFACE This report, prepared by the Economic Research Service of U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, extends and brings up to date the information in Technical Bulletin 891, "Marketing and Manufacturing Margins for Textiles," published in 1945 and now out of print; Teclinical Bulletin 1062, "Marketing and Manu- facturing Service and Margins," published in 1952 and now out of print ; and Technical Bulletin 1210, "Changes in American Textile Industry—Competi- tion, Structure, Facilities, Costs," published in 1959 and now out of print. The information presented was brought up to date through 1962, or as near that date as data available in 1963 would permit. The data were compiled mainly from secondary sources, including govern- ment and private agencies. Data made available by the Bureau of the Census, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Trade Commission, International Cotton Advisory Committee, U.S. Tariff Commission, National Association of Textile and Apparel Wholesalers, National Retail Merchants Association, Dun and Bradstreet, Inc., and National Cotton Council of America were especially useful in the preparation of this report. Inadequate funds for publication necessitated the deletion of many tables prepared for this report. Other tables were reduced and combined. But the text is based on the tabulations before the deletions and reductions. Credit is due Amos D.
    [Show full text]
  • 00003-82832.Pdf (121.96
    March 26, 2012 Donald S. Clark Secretary Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC, 20580 Subj.: Wool Rules, 16 CFR part 300, Project No. P124201 Dear Mr. Clark: This is a response on behalf of the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, American Sheep Industry Association, Cashmere and Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute, the National Council of Textile Organizations, and the National Textile Association to the Federal Trade Commission’s Federal Register Notice published January 30, 2012 requesting comments for use in the Commission’s review of Rules and Regulations Under the Rule Products Labeling Act of 1939 (“Wool Rules”). We respectfully submit the following comments for consideration by the Commission with regard to the questions (1), (2), (3), (4), (9), (10), (12), (13), and (16) in the Federal Register Notice: (1) Is there a continuing need for the Rules as currently promulgated? Yes, there is a continuing need for the Rules as currently promulgated. The Rules implement the provisions of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 (``Wool Act''), 15 U.S.C. 68-68j. The Rules have assisted American consumers in making informed choices regarding purchases of wool products by requiring accurate and concise fiber content labeling on such products. Wool, including specialty wools such as cashmere, is widely recognized as a luxury fiber due to its superior look, feel, and performance; it is also a relatively expensive fiber, with the result that unscrupulous processors, importers, and retailers defraud consumers by mislabeling as "wool" or "cashmere" less expensive fibers or less expensive types of wool. We find such fraudulent mislabeling is most frequent among imported products.
    [Show full text]