Sample Copy Only Not for Reproduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sample Copy Only Not for Reproduction 26282_Geo_Arizona.qxd 8/17/07 5:51 PM Page 1 ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS TO ASK Arizona.1 Introduction Ⅲ What role has plate tectonics played in creating Arizona’s landscape? Ⅲ What are the three physiographic provinces found in Arizona? Arizona.2 The Proterozoic Foundation of Arizona Ⅲ What primary process was involved in forming the land in Arizona’s early history? Ⅲ Where do we see Proterozoic rocks exposed in the state today? Arizona.3 Paleozoic Clastics and Carbonates Ⅲ What evidence do we have that several episodes of transgressions and regressions deposited thick sedimentary sequences? Ⅲ How extensive were the marine inundations that covered Arizona? Arizona.4 Transitions during the Mesozoic Era Ⅲ Why were there extensive sand and river deposits covering the northeastern portion of the state? Ⅲ Where were the sources for volcanic deposits in southern Arizona? Arizona.5 Laramide and Mid-Tertiary Upheaval Ⅲ What role did plate tectonics play in creating geologic features in Arizona? Arizona.6 Volcanic Activity Ⅲ What are the time span and spatial extent of volcanism? Ⅲ What types of volcanic features have been formed? Arizona.7 Formation of the Grand Canyon Ⅲ How did the Colorado River form the Grand Canyon? Ⅲ Where did all the eroded material go? Ⅲ How dynamic is the Grand Canyon in terms of changing in the future? Arizona.8 Economic Resources Ⅲ Why is Arizona home to some of the largest copper deposits in the world, and how have they contributed to the development of the state? Ⅲ What does the future hold for mining in the state? Arizona.9 Water Resources Ⅲ Where does Arizona get its water? Ⅲ What is the future of water in Arizona? Arizona.10 Environmental Concerns and Geologic Hazards Ⅲ Has Arizona experienced natural disasters in the past? Ⅲ How stable is the state in terms of future disasters? Sample Copy Only Not for Reproduction © 2008 Thomson Brooks/Cole, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and Brooks/Cole are trademarks used herein under license. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution or information storage and retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher. The Adaptable Courseware Program consists of products and additions to existing Brooks/Cole products that are produced from camera-ready copy. Peer review, class testing, and accuracy are primarily the responsibility of the author(s). Geology of Arizona/David M. Best - First Edition ISBN 1-426-62628-2. Printed in the United States of America. 26282_Geo_Arizona.qxd 8/17/07 7:56 PM Page 2 2 Arizona Geology of Arizona ᮣ Figure Arizona.1 Geologic time scale. The numbers indicate the Arizona.1 number of years before present, in millions of years. Introduction Eon Era Period Epoch Recent or As a student taking a geology course in Arizona, you will Holocene 0 want to learn how the concepts you become exposed to can Quaternary be applied to the rich and diverse geologic settings within Pleistocene 0.01 the state. The overview that follows takes you across the Pliocene 1.8 state in terms of its geology, addressing some of the major topographic differences as well as the wide variety of rock Miocene 5 types and the manner in which they were formed and sub- Oligocene 23 sequently exposed. Tertiary Many people think of Arizona as being covered only by Eocene 34 Paleogene Neogene desert, with the Grand Canyon somewhere within the state Paleocene 56 boundaries. Located in the American Southwest, Arizona has a wide range of rock types, including some that formed Cretaceous 66 almost 2 billion years ago (Ga). The northern and north- Jurassic 146 eastern portions of the state are covered by relatively hori- Triassic 200 zontal layers of sedimentary units, which formed near Phanerozoic continental margins, in shallow seas, or in desert conditions. Permian 251 Portions of the southern and southwestern regions are the result of tectonic activity that occurred between 30 and Pennsylvanian 299 80 million years ago (Ma). Throughout the state, igneous activity produced several dozen mountain ranges and areas Mississippian 318 Carboniferous of extrusive material. We will refer to various geologic Devonian times throughout our discussion, so the geologic time scale Paleozoic Mesozoic359 Cenozoic is provided to help you gain a temporal appreciation for when different events occurred (Figure Arizona.1). Silurian 416 The overarching concept of plate tectonics, a theory that Ordovician 444 has become well established in geology since the early 1960s, has been instrumental in explaining the way the state Cambrian 488 looks and in contributing to the makeup of the Southwest. 542 The effects of major incursions of oceans and the uplift of mountain ranges and the surrounding land, coupled with collisions between landmasses, have all left their mark. Arizona has moved across the globe through geologic time, 2500 Early bacteria which helps explain the formation of major rock units such as limestone and sandstone deposits associated with marine Archean Proterozoic Precambrian and desert environments, respectively. Collisions with other plates produced volcanic extrusions and igneous masses 3600 buried below the surface. During the Cambrian Period, Hadean Arizona was situated at about 10 degrees north of the equa- tor, where shallow marine environments created lime muds 4600 (Figure Arizona.2). Sample Copy Only The region then began to move to the south until the mid-Silurian Period, when it began its long journey north- Exposed outcrops display areas that were once located at ward. This steady movement has seen it shift from roughly the depositional terminus of major streams that eroded 20 degrees south latitude to Notas far north as 45for degrees, Reproduction nearby mountains, creating extensive deposits of mud- which lies along the present-day Montana-Wyoming border. stones, sandstones, and conglomerates. During this time the region experienced a wide range of geologic environments. Today Arizona is located at approx- imately 35 degrees north of the equator. The Geologic Map of Arizona and Keep in mind that most of the current topography has Physiographic Provinces been carved by weather and climate over a relatively short A physiographic province is a region in which all parts time span (several tens of millions of years) when measured display similar geologic structures and geomorphology. against the age of the oldest exposed rocks or even the age When the concept is applied to Arizona, there are three of the Earth itself, estimated at about 4.6 billion years. such provinces within the state (Figure Arizona.3). 26282_Geo_Arizona.qxd 8/17/07 10:14 PM Page 3 Arizona.1 Introduction 3 ᮣ Figure Arizona.2 The Southwest was covered by shallow The northern third of the state lies in the Colorado equatorial seas during the Middle Cambrian. Extensive shallow waters Plateau, a relatively circular area centered on the Four covered most of Arizona and regions to the north and west. Deeper Corners region (the only point in the United States where oceans are shown to the west and continental landmasses to the east. four states come together—Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah). Rocks on the Colorado Plateau in Arizona are predominantly sedimentary units consisting of sandstones, mudstones, and limestones (Figures Arizona.4 and Arizona.5). Most of the rocks range in age from Permian to Triassic, with lesser amounts of Cretaceous ᮣ Figure Arizona.4 Sedimentary rocks are common in northern Arizona. The Moenkopi Formation formed in continental rivers and epicontinental seas. Image by Dr. Ronald C. Blakey, Northern Arizona University. Ronald C. Blakey, Image by Dr. ᮣ Figure Arizona.3 The physiographic regions of Arizona. COLORADO PLATEAU ᮣ Figure Arizona.5 The Kaibab Limestone, as seen from the Little Colorado River Scenic Overlook east of the Grand Canyon, displays layered strata that formed in a shallow, warm water sea that existed TRANSITION during the Permian Period. Sample Copy Only Not forZONE Reproduction BASIN AND RANGE 26282_Geo_Arizona.qxd 8/17/07 5:51 PM Page 4 4 Arizona Geology of Arizona sediments cropping out in localized areas that contain sand- stones interbedded with coal and shales. There are also Section Arizona.1 Summary some volcanic rocks that form small mountain ranges and ● Arizona has had a complex geologic history, which is isolated peaks. recorded in a diverse range of rock sequences and Moving to the south we encounter the Transition Zone, surface features. a region that serves as the dividing line between the rocks of the Colorado Plateau and those of the Basin and Range ● The state is divided into three physiographic regions, physiographic province to the south and west. Within the each having a distinct geologic history and appearance. Transition Zone lie many of the oldest exposed rocks found in the state. In general the oldest rocks are found in the northwest part of the Transition Zone. Some samples found north of Kingman are about 1.8 billion years old. These rocks are thought to have been part of a continental mass Arizona.2 associated with the earliest formation of the North The Proterozoic Foundation American continent, which contains the Wyoming Province, an area that extends to the north and east from of Arizona northern Arizona across Wyoming and the Dakotas. The central part of the North American craton is composed Collisions of these landmasses produced intrusive igneous of continental lithosphere that formed by the suturing of and metamorphic rocks that are common in the mountains several smaller continental masses more than 2 Ga. In the of northwest Arizona and southeastern Nevada. To the southwestern United States several episodes of accretion southeast there are exposures of granites and metamorphic occurred that added multiple terranes to the 2.5-billion-year- rocks that formed from about 1.6 to 1.4 Ga.
Recommended publications
  • South Dakota to Nebraska
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 325 1998 Lithostratigraphic revision and correlation of the lower part of the White River Group: South Dakota to Nebraska Dennis O. Terry, Jr. Department of Geology, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340 ABSTRACT Lithologic correlations between type areas of the White River Group in Nebraska and South Dakota have resulted in a revised lithostratigraphy for the lower part of the White River Group. The following pedostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic units, from oldest to youngest, are newly recognized in northwestern Nebraska and can be correlated with units in the Big Badlands of South Dakota: the Yellow Mounds Pale- osol Equivalent, Interior and Weta Paleosol Equivalents, Chamberlain Pass Forma- tion, and Peanut Peak Member of the Chadron Formation. The term “Interior Paleosol Complex,” used for the brightly colored zone at the base of the White River Group in northwestern Nebraska, is abandoned in favor of a two-part division. The lower part is related to the Yellow Mounds Paleosol Series of South Dakota and rep- resents the pedogenically modified Cretaceous Pierre Shale. The upper part is com- posed of the unconformably overlying, pedogenically modified overbank mudstone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation (which contains the Interior and Weta Paleosol Series in South Dakota). Greenish-white channel sandstones at the base of the Chadron Formation in Nebraska (previously correlated to the Ahearn Member of the Chadron Formation in South Dakota) herein are correlated to the channel sand- stone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation in South Dakota. The Chamberlain Pass Formation is unconformably overlain by the Chadron Formation in South Dakota and Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita - Stephen J
    Curriculum Vita - Stephen J. Reynolds School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1404 (480) 965-9049 (work) Website: http://reynolds.asu.edu email: [email protected] Degrees/Registration University of Texas, El Paso: B.S., Geology, 1974 University of Arizona: M.S., Geosciences, 1977, Ph.D., Geosciences,1982 Arizona Registered Geologist #26773 (1993-present) Recent Professional Experience Arizona State University, Dept. of Geology: Professor (6/97 to present), Associate Professor (8/91 to 6/97). Teaching responsibilities include Advanced Geologic Field Mapping, Advanced Structural Geology, Applied Arizona Geology, Cordilleran Regional Geology, Geology of Arizona, Geotectonics, Introductory Geology, Orogenic Systems, Summer Field Geology, Methods of Geoscience Teaching ASU Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Associate Director (6/99 to present); chairman of founding committee. Arizona Geological Survey and Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology: Research Geologist (6/88 to 7/91), Associate Research Geologist (6/87 to 6/88); Assistant Research Geologist (2/81 to 6/87). University of Arizona, Dept. of Geosciences: Visiting Associate Professor, (1991 to ~1997); Adjunct Associate Research Scientist (1987 to 1991); Research Associate and Assistant (1/75 to 12/80); Teaching Assistant (8/74 to 7/75) Geologist and Consulting Geologist: Clients include Animas Resources (2007 to present), Pediment Exploration, Ltd. (2007 to present), Clear Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Blakey, Publications (Does Not Include Abstracts)
    Ron Blakey, Publications (does not include abstracts) The publications listed below were mainly produced during my tenure as a member of the Geology Department at Northern Arizona University. Those after 2009 represent ongoing research as Professor Emeritus. (PDF) – A PDF is available for this paper. Send me an email and I'll attach to return email Blakey, R.C., 1973, Stratigraphy and origin of the Moenkopi Formation of southeastern Utah: Mountain Geologist, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1 17. Blakey, R.C., 1974, Stratigraphic and depositional analysis of the Moenkopi Formation, Southeastern Utah: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 104, 81 p. Blakey, R.C., 1977, Petroliferous lithosomes in the Moenkopi Formation, Southern Utah: Utah Geology, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 67 84. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Oil impregnated carbonate rocks of the Timpoweap Member Moenkopi Formation, Hurricane Cliffs area, Utah and Arizona: Utah Geology, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 45 54. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Stratigraphy of the Supai Group (Pennsylvanian Permian), Mogollon Rim, Arizona: in Carboniferous Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon Country, northern Arizona and southern Nevada, Field Trip No. 13, Ninth International Congress of Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, p. 89 109. Blakey, R.C., 1979, Lower Permian stratigraphy of the southern Colorado Plateau: in Four Corners Geological Society, Guidebook to the Permian of the Colorado Plateau, p. 115 129. (PDF) Blakey, R.C., 1980, Pennsylvanian and Early Permian paleogeography, southern Colorado Plateau and vicinity: in Paleozoic Paleogeography of west central United States, Rocky Mountain Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, p. 239 258. Blakey, R.C., Peterson, F., Caputo, M.V., Geesaman, R., and Voorhees, B., 1983, Paleogeography of Middle Jurassic continental, shoreline, and shallow marine sedimentation, southern Utah: Mesozoic PaleogeogÂraphy of west central United States, Rocky Mountain Section of Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (Symposium), p.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Badlands/Norton Younglove Preserve
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park Service U.S
    National Park Grand Canyon National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The Painted Map by Erwin Ralsz WHAT IS The Painted Desert is a well-known Formation. While several rock layers in THE PAINTED DESERT? Arizona landscape of very colorful "bad northeastern Arizona are colorful, it is the lands" extending across northeastern particular beauty of the Chinle Formation Arizona. (Badlands are intricately dis that gave rise to the notion of a Painted sected, barren, and rounded landscapes that Desert. Although the Chinle Formation can typically occur in arid regions where weak be seen elsewhere, in the Painted Desert the rock is prevalent). The Painted Desert is exposure of this rock is long and continu distinctly defined by exposures of a rock ous. layer known as the Chinle (Chin-lee) The Painted Desert is exposed in a of Winslow, Arizona along State Highway WHERE TO SEE band of rock trending northwest from 87. Winslow is 140 miles from Grand THE PAINTED DESERT Holbrook, Arizona to The Gap, Arizona. Canyon's South Rim. This band is wider in the Holbrook area and narrows significantly to the northwest. Few Closest to Grand Canyon, the Painted roads provide access to the Painted Desert. Desert is exposed in a narrow band along U.S. Highway 89 from about 3 miles north Unquestionably, the most famous part of Cameron, Arizona (at milepost#470) to of the Painted Desert is at Petrified Forest the small village of The Gap farther north. National Park, 190 miles from the South A small but visually striking example of the Rim of Grand Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology and Mineralization of the Grayback Mountains, Yavapai County, Arizona"
    MJWii UflUJU he US I H x g University of Nevada Reno Mackay School of Mines J "The Geology and Mineralization of the Grayback Mountains, Yavapai County, Arizona" A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology By Michael Robert Kotraba April 1992 Signature Page Mackay School of Mines April 1992 ii Acknowledgements Many things go into the completion of a Masters Degree. Once you are given the opportunity to pursue the degree you need to find a thesis project and the support to complete the project. Without a doubt the most important support needed in this sort of endeavor comes from home. I would like to thank my wife, Julie and daughter, Kellie for their patience and support from start to finish. Many things were sacrificed for the opportunity to return to school for a Masters degree and I am thankful for their willingness to make those sacrifices. Support from other family members was also appreciated. Thanks goes to my dad for being a faithful field assistant and camp cook, and to my sister and brother-in-law for providing a place to stay and a vehicle to drive while out in the field. The opportunity and funding to make my pursuit of a Masters degree possible was given by Dr. L.T. Larson. Not only did he make the whole process possible but he also made it enjoyable. I truly appreciated his guidance, expertise, encouragement, and sense of humor. Thanks L.T.! The idea for this thesis grew out of conversations with the staff geologist at Cyprus Bagdad, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota
    The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota Philip W. Stoffer1 Paula Messina John A. Chamberlain, Jr. Dennis O. Terry, Jr. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-56 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The Cretaceous/Tertiary (K-T) boundary study interval at the Rainbow Colors Overlook along Badlands Loop Road, North Unit of Badlands National Park. This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of01-056/ ABSTRACT A marine K-T boundary interval has been identified throughout the Badlands National Park region of South Dakota. Data from marine sediments suggest that deposits from two asteroid impacts (one close, one far away) may be preserved in the Badlands. These impact- generated deposits may represent late Maestrichtian events or possibly the terminal K-T event. Interpretation is supported by paleontological correlation, sequence stratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and strontium isotope geochronology. This research is founded on nearly a decade of NPS approved field work in Badlands National Park and a foundation of previously published data and interpretations. The K-T boundary occurs within
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial
    Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial Prepared for the National Park Service under terms of Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement H1200-05-0003 Task Agreement J8680090020 Prepared by Adam M. Hudson,1 J. Jesse Minor,2,3 Erin E. Posthumus4 In cooperation with the Arizona State Museum The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Beth Grindell, Principal Investigator May 17, 2013 1: Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 2: School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 3: Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona 4: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona ([email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................3 Beth Grindell, Ph.D. Ch. 1: Current research and information for exhibit development on the geology of Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial, Southeast Arizona, USA..................................................................................................................................... 5 Adam M. Hudson, M.S. Section 1: Geologic Time and the Geologic Time Scale ..................................................5 Section 2: Plate Tectonic Evolution and Geologic History of Southeast Arizona .........11 Section 3: Park-specific Geologic History – Chiricahua
    [Show full text]
  • (Central Arizona) GEOSPHERE
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Incision history of the Verde Valley region and implications for uplift of the Colorado Plateau (central Arizona) 1 2 2 GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 4 Richard F. Ott , Kelin X. Whipple , and Matthijs van Soest 1Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 2School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, 781 S. Terrace Road, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01640.1 12 figures; 3 tables; 1 supplemental file ABSTRACT et al., 2008; Moucha et al., 2009; Huntington et al., 2010; Liu and Gurnis, 2010; Flowers and Farley, 2012; Crow et al., 2014; Darling and Whipple, 2015; Karl- CORRESPONDENCE: richard .ott1900@ gmail .com The record of Tertiary landscape evolution preserved in Arizona’s transition strom et al., 2017). As part of this debate, the incision of the Mogollon Rim, zone presents an independent opportunity to constrain the timing of Colo­ the southwestern edge of the Colorado Plateau (Fig. 1), is not well constrained CITATION: Ott, R.F., Whipple, K.X., and van Soest, rado Plateau uplift and incision. We study this record of landscape evolution in the literature, and disparate ideas about its formation and incision history M., Incision history of the Verde Valley region and implications for uplift of the Colorado Plateau by mapping Tertiary sediments, volcanic deposits, and the erosional uncon­ have been proposed (Peirce et al., 1979; Lindberg, 1986; Elston and Young, ( central Ari zona): Geosphere, v. 14, no. 4, p. 1690– formity at their base, 40Ar/39Ar dating of basaltic lava flows in key locations, and 1991; Holm, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Geologic Plates of Eastern Arizona and Western New Mexico
    Implications of Live Oil Shows in an Eastern Arizona Geothermal Test (1 Alpine-Federal) by Steven L. Rauzi Oil and Gas Program Administrator Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-1 Version 2.0 June, 2009 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 INTRODUCTION The 1 Alpine-Federal geothermal test, at an elevation of 8,556 feet in eastern Arizona, was drilled by the Arizona Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Energy to obtain information about the hot-dry-rock potential of Precambrian rocks in the Alpine-Nutrioso area, a region of extensive basaltic volcanism in southern Apache County. The hole reached total depth of 4,505 feet in August 1993. Temperature measurements were taken through October 1993 when final temperature, gamma ray, and neutron logs were run. The Alpine-Federal hole is located just east of U.S. Highway 180/191 (old 180/666) at the divide between Alpine and Nutrioso, in sec. 23, T. 6 N., R. 30 E., in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest (Fig. 1). The town of Alpine is about 6 miles south of the wellsite and the Arizona-New Mexico state line is about 6 miles east. The basaltic Springerville volcanic field is just north of the wellsite (Crumpler, L.S., Aubele, J.C., and Condit, C.D., 1994). Although volcanic rocks of middle Miocene to Oligocene age (Reynolds, 1988) are widespread in the region, erosion has removed them from the main valleys between Alpine and Nutrioso. As a result, the 1 Alpine-Federal was spudded in sedimentary strata of Oligocene to Eocene age (Reynolds, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the TERRY 30´ X 60´ QUADRANGLE EASTERN MONTANA
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE TERRY 30´ x 60´ QUADRANGLE EASTERN MONTANA Compiled and mapped by Susan M. Vuke1 and Roger B. Colton2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 477 2003 1Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology 2U.S. Geological Survey Map revised: 2007 This report has been reviewed for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology technical and editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the STATEMAP component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under contract Number 02-HQ-AG0038. 107° 106° 105° 104° 47°30' Circle 200 Jordan 200s 200 GLENDIVE CIRCLE JORDAN 200s Glendive 94 47° 59 Wibaux Terry TERRY WIBAUX ANGELA 46°30' Miles City 12 Baker 12 Forsyth 94 MILES CITY BAKER FORSYTH 59 46° Location of Terry 30'x60' quadrangle and adjacent geologic maps published by MBMG. 1 CORRELATION DIAGRAM TERRY 30´ x 60´ QUADRANGLE Qal Holocene Qac Qls Qat Quaternary QTcl QTat Pleistocene Pliocene Tftr Tertiary Tfle Paleocene Tfld Tft Fort Union Formation Fort 2 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS TERRY 30´ x 60´ QUADRANGLE Note: Thicknesses are given in feet because original field maps were on 7.5’ quadrangles with topographic contour intervals in feet. To convert feet to meters (the contour interval unit on this map), multiply feet x 0.3048. Qal ALLUVIUM (HOLOCENE)—Light-brown and gray, moderately to well-sorted and stratified clay, silt, sand and gravel. As much as 100 ft thick under floodplain of the Yellowstone River and as much as 25 ft thick under tributaries of the Yellowstone River.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Sediment Delivery and Landscape Connectivity in the Mancos Shale Badlands and Fremont River System, Utah, USA
    Geomorphology 102 (2008) 242–251 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Episodic sediment delivery and landscape connectivity in the Mancos Shale badlands and Fremont River system, Utah, USA Andrew E. Godfrey 1, Benjamin L. Everitt a, José F. Martín Duque b,⁎ a 170 W. 300 North, Ivins, Utah 84738, USA b Department of Geodynamics, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The Fremont River drains about 1000 km2 of Mancos Shale badlands, which provide a large percentage of the Accepted 23 May 2007 total sediment load of its middle and lower reaches. Factors controlling sediment movement include: Available online 18 May 2008 weathering that produces thin paralithic soils, mass movement events that move the soil onto locations susceptible to fluvial transport, intense precipitation events that move the sediment along rills and across Keywords: local pediments, and finally Fremont River floods that move the sediment to the main-stem Colorado River. Mancos Shale badlands A forty-year erosion-pin study has shown that down-slope creep moves the weathered shale crust an Erosion Mass movement average of 5.9 cm/yr. Weather records and our monitoring show that wet winters add large slab failures and Connectivity mudflows. Recent sediment-trap studies show that about 95% of sediment movement across pediments is Coupling accomplished by high-intensity summer convective storms. Between 1890 and 1910, a series of large autumn Arroyo cutting floods swept down the Fremont River, eroding its floodplain and transforming it from a narrow and meandering channel to a broad, braided one.
    [Show full text]