JASON M. STANEK
CIIA IRIA
IICl-IAEL T. RICHARD ANFIIONV J. O’I)ONNELL 000C,WU OBI LINTON IINDV U. hERMAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
May 15, 2019
In the matter of the application of Bluegrass * Solar, LLC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to construct a Case No. 9496 80.0 MW solar photovoltaic generating facility in Queen Annes County, Maryland *
VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL
The Honorable James J. Moran President Board of County Commissioners 107 North Liberty Street Centreville. Maryland 21617
Re: Second Public Comment Hearing !DillSRTOR’S OF Dear President Moran: Y 17 ‘i p.2:1
Pursuant to Sections 7-207 and 7-208 of the Public Utilities Article, a person must obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the Public Service Commission before beginning construction of either a generating station or electric company overhead transmission line designed to carry voltage in excess of 69.000 volts (or exercising the right of condemnation in connection therewith), unless exempted by Section 7-207.1 for certain generating stations up to 70 megawatts (“MW”).
Section 7-207, a copy of which is enclosed for your information, also provides for holding a public hearing in the jurisdiction where the facility is to be constructed ( 7-207(d)). This public hearing is to be held by the Commission and the local governing bodies in the area unless the governing body or bodies choose not to participate.
Bluegrass Solar. LLC (“Bluegrass Solar’) filed an application with this Commission for the construction of an 80.0 MW solar photovoltaic generating station and associated facilities, a copy of which was previously furnished to you. This application has been docketed as Case No. 9496. The enclosed Public Utility Law Judge’s Notice of Second Public
WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER TOWER • 6 ST PAUL STREET • BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21202-6806
410-767-8000 • Toll Free: 1-800-492-0474 • FAX 410-333-6495
MDR5: 1-800-735-2258 (TTY/Voice) • Website: w’wpsc state.md.us
;.[, 1 May 15, 2019 Page 2
Comment Hearing schedules this matter for a public hearing on June 18, 2019, at 6:30 p.m.. and Bluegrass Solar has arranged for the hearing to be held at Church Hill Elementary School. 631 Main Street, Church Hill, Maryland 21623.
I request that you advise me no later than June 14, 2019, whether you and/or any member of the Board of County Commissioners wish to sit jointly with me at the public hearing. If I do not hear from you on or before June 14, 2019, I will assume that neither you nor any Commissioner wish to sit jointly with me; however, either you or any Commissioner may. of course. attend the hearing and present whatever relevant staternenjyoueem appropriate.
Utility Law Judge
Enclosures cc: All Parties of Record
2 -
0/4/2017 hftpa:II1
\/J
WOVi
§
.nexl.wesltew.com/Documen
F
7-207,
AnnceI.d
7-207,
I
(a)(1)(l)
otoined (Oil
Wcrt’s
I_
Cerificate
slsi 11751 (2) system
§
Propoasd Pubito 1\\i\1
Csrilficata
i)(I)
site (Ii) boring
(II) obtain itt) certltlcate aubllile, 7-207. genwalor
Certi(loeie DivIsiu
Is,
corslruction
2, demolition: of equipment is substantial 1. Coda
2
1.
Airiiotorcct Tier
In
tht
Construction UnlesS NotwIthstanding fe
or
delpnad
any the actual
a a train
In Urtlitics
title
route generating that qualiilad
— a ci person
Leglaieilorr
sanilon Maryland
I
entry
of Certificate the physIcal
cerlltioata Maqarid
or
I,
aecllon
the
of
ot
lead
a is construction
put,ilc
Public
of
TIer
Commission for
public
public centilicela exclusively
necessary Ios
or
CommissIon
Into (ttufs
to
Coda obtains
publlo
Pormerly generation
line
nonijillily
generator
2 carry
qssapited
change
of
does and 11751
IIN8CO steIion to
a
renewable A. S’icca convenience
ol I’,uuc
convenience
unleas:
&
of
binding
convenience subparagraph
the generation
L.Icvu
convenience
public
of
nItos)
Ia § a
Commission
Msiyiin,si
not of
MD in 7.208 V01t0g0
to owner yOu,,5 owned
public ctrsd
purposes
shall or 11
ale
or publIc gensriator
lead
the
ascertaIn
stetlon inoluda
end a
F51
use
agreemenl convenience
Cods, EFfective:
s,CiIGI5jt
paraort
SOUrDS
site,
as
Stale
of
eCompi
line,
or
687C by Utilities
In
in convenience
arid convenience MD
ltscuvo: and
his
operator
station
eCcees
PublIc
arid an corusirucrion
Including a Currentness
(I) or
or
Definitions end
approssi
which lead
foundation may change
to necessity
subttie, PUBLIC
It of necessity
quellfled elecirlo
October
or
a
rreceseitt/ Interconnect or
neoessity E79
lhla
iTttlae
perscn
0os,
ttna use
and UtilitIes,
‘,.tI,jy not
contractual or
cannot
of
or
878C07420F4 paragraph,
fabricatIon,
eo,ooo
for
thai
in the
begin
company, necessity sort
moans UTIL
corusirucllor,’ qualified
I
under
1-15) in
eecurirrg ganoretor I, conditions
front construction
and
required
2017 F
Is proposed
2057
be the
necessity required required
I
dlLljfl,5
needed
construction
COMP
7-207
Volts
with
(Role
canceled the
an necessity ihis
Stale obilgailon
(App,,
for a
erection,
overhead
geological
‘equirameni
a
anO generator
aellon. person
before &
teaS portion
construction
generating
NtIS,
before for or
means: bofore
1 (or
Annoy)
under
7207
5CENlew/FutiTexthlmi7orlgiflationContoxtdocumanttoc&trensil(onyp
would
to
6p5eij
or
the
the
tine
IS, to
In
may requited
undertake trsteiiallon, moduleS
corsetruotln
r.,isLUu)
at purchese transmission
temporary
000structton
construction
ho
construction
data,
allow
the
7.207,1
to
lead not
State station,
ol
obtain
elecirlc
includIng
apply
art
e
without
a line
qualified
before
of:
out-of.
program of
or
use
a
to this
tine Is
of
of
of of
first
any
generedon
generation
a
etston
stellar,
or
wel
orf&5ncP
Consiruolon
FInSinga tn NOTO8
qualified
gansrei
OF
generator
xi
axe
QEC1SIONS
oVidencs
eppllceilen
lead
(11)
line
Stalu
.
1/6
3 10)412017
hitps://1
,nsxi.weetiaw,com/DoCLJmenhJNBCOll
§
7.207.
obisinad generating necessary (2> carry convenience may construction, person (3)(i)
convenience an volts, (dot)
(ii) may (Ni) for (iv) arid territory (iv) for
(or seotion. fy)
Unlace
Certlfloata
existing
convenience
company generator company 1. 2. pubito
states, 2, be disiribiition not 2. 1,ls company conairucilonl 1,
condemnation, 2. ot
2.
eminent
For Except I.
the a
ihe which Notwiihatandlng
of Except 1.
The
at qualified proposal iris teed A, B,
necessity at
waive Is
the the voltage may On
require right require
aubjact
This
exercise
least
from
lila conafruciton did any or, certificate efafed an consfruciioii
Commission
of convenience Cornrrsiasion to a
cost ovsrhesd issuance
ateilon,
line:
ovrhoad
not a
on electric
necessary certificate paragraph,
as not
and sri ensure subparagraph
fhe time as
domain:
and
to
certificate
the iaed £0 hat
and of
ui-s larger in
to genereior
the of provided under
in begin or
eervica
provided afeciric construct
for accept
requirement pt.,blio and
days necassiiy a
of excess
Commission, regutafion
necessity owns
the
writing at
person lie
atarI line right
of
the
air
company:
in
oi
e least
frasmlssion
or
necesstiy,
icsnamtselOrr ratepaysra.
overhead which public related of consiruclion or
subparagraph
accordance sulficiarri of before
a
sheii overiread
would for
may construction
convenience from company fairilory
ihat and higher the
of of of
an
cerli,9ceia
in
of
pubflc
that in
iead
tire
10 to
the
condemnelion public commercial
paragraph
for
applies 69,000 overhead
Commission
subparagraph if
waive
portion necessity, convenience not the as
obtain
the
days
to
the lit the Interconnect qustifted
F51 li-a
constwotiorr
er tine,
the
struciures
s and
convenience
transmission supply en subparagraph the issue of eiectric
person
‘janemieslorr convenience public
Commission
filing eiecfrlO
to
607011 line
construction
before title that with
of
tins
of volta
exIsting
to new
pereon
at the
err
of
(I)
public art
and transmission
the
a te (4) requirement
the
of operation generator en the eleotrio dealgnsd
of
applicant Title
of
Conimiesion
uiiiiiy
certificate company
real
e to or overhead
may
10
company an in of construcilon
eiectrtcfy and the
ovarhaad
ihia riecesiiy E7B87B0D742DP41 proposal (ii) electric
electric
a or be
exercise
find overhead
accommodate:
convenience connection
this
12
property application
full
line and
of
filing maintenance by lasue
located necessity: paragraph
/ne,
finds and
company: (I)
of Ia
in
L1rt
and subsection,
an
ro
other of
lead is
of
Oral necessity
would
ti-re
grid
of good
company: trensmiseion
of nscasaity
tine to
a
carry did
to the or
officer a to
i—at this
paragraph, transmission
e
requirad
public fair has
person
obiole or en ceriillcste irensmiselon Real
obielnad
be aoisiy right
a ilne of Customers in
tl’iari
not
in overhead
wiih
faith
paragraph
flagellated for ddtiiorisi
the
construct opportunity
application
Maryland an a
found arid paid and
end
ins
cc
irriend voltage
Property
of end
ci convenience
a
for
Sri
overhead construction
the
a within unless
may
offered is
an certificate aisotric
condemnation subject before necessity the
certificate solely
the
eiectric
required from
that
5CENiew/FullText,html?originafionConieni=documenitoc&irarrsitionTyp..,
for
of
construcilon
agency
life
in line transmission
transmission acquire to
the public rlgtiis.of.way
coneiruction
in line,
construction the to for
version
a
fhe ins Artiole,
construct for met
the for
by
distr,bufion construction excess
he
which
cerilficelo
only
0 transmission qualified good
otecfric
corripony
a thai
oepecliy the Stete, for of th
winter subparagraph
01 Commiaeion,
of
is electric
and does
convenience
cenilficeis
by
lithe public
public the
designed the
of Commission any
oiactnio
electric cause,
the
with ol
of
necesaify
the
the
not:
a
this
United
line, line,
89,000
generator
a rsietnd property is
through applicant of
qualified
person
if
te
eervice
the
Oral
pubifo
of
line
will
of
to
generation
a
to
station
or
qualitied
genersior
lead
line
Sialu
2/8 __c
10/4/2017
hitps:/I
1
I—
.n
axt,weatiaw,cor’n/DooumenUNECO
§
7-207.
under
to (c)(
hearing (d)(1)
volta, county slalion,
subeecfcri, (2)
Commission provIde public station, (2) (3)(i) iocated, covrtiy
I)
(Ii) repetrs, may corporation or (t) (v) iesd (lii) corporation (It) (vi) qusii(lad (iv) irsrismisslon pians (I) any (ii) comrnsnl ihls 1
The
On The
era Certillosie
this The mIle
that 2, subparagraph,
2. corporafcn 3. 1. quafitiad the
each
and fits 1.
each each Once
the ant on eli each
portion A. aubsecilon 6, comment:
Within
undertake
line by receipt on on
or
For
Commission,
ovrheed
Commission section, notice
quaiifiao or
Commission
was Daperlmsrrt Vnias8 of oilier overhead
governing
larger the inroesed
murifclpai
governing
municipsi advsrlieemoni
iwo the appropriaie
list
programs; member member
generator ia
the
member
in consiruckori
aneW
regarding
appilcailon
shalt
completed, proposed
30 each generator
of within in Corrimisalon’s
iypas
is interested
of
immedIately
of
proposed
lins,
conductors.
the
which
affsctgd the the
days necessary
gerteralor forward an
pubko
the
who
transmissiOn
pro
iransrnission
of
governing corporation a
body, voltage;
of of
corporation body, or generafrig of of Commieston appiicetion
1
of
ahaf
lead necessary
when person shalt vfde
arid
the
the after the the Slate miie
requeste
any qualified the eociai
Planning: to
lead
br oonvetierrce
related
In
by persona, Iocalion
a
arid 4
be General eigntfloance General and hoid
weeki’/ itne;
General provide
portIon of a copy coneiruoiion
lead of succeSsIve a
11 sanding
to
the Notice or
unit
Web
itne
shaf newspaper
constructed:
medIa;
certificate
FE
it body Ilie
he avoid
PublIc 1
and
tine, the
in station,
sppflcabie for
a generator to appfcelion; In tins
appitcable conOtrucilen, itna
and of 1
ia
hail proposed of
site. copy 887C1 whIch appilcafion noilco
file
which
an of Aeeembiy Aeaernbiy an
pubilc
a the
Assembly
proposed
decfines
to
or the the
desIgned
art Is
end
unit certltlcate
the
existing opportunity a
end
hearing
of Interested QiJslitlsd
proposed provide
sppticsliorr
of weeks
imminent overhead of
report notice genaraiing
any
is of
of
1 arty
genarafng ihe
of
hearing
the
9708?6C07420F4
pubiic lead
necessity compisiad
the
general the
iooaticn
ho local
portion to
proposgi
portion inciuded
rapresanfng to:
application, to
representing
overvead
to tmniedisieiy w!th
executive,
required
pubfo notice
participate executive, required
tine;
o
generaior
be
carry
convenience lobe
government
safety
jolniiy
transmission pubfc for
persons
to:
the
station, constructed:
circuialicn
of
of
station,
of
publIc
required
hearing
irnmediaiaiy
under
to
a under
locefed,
the the
Commission
ih
under
with hezerd
voitage transmission
convenience
State,
of
ot
in iead
generating coneiruofon
any
before
ccnstruction
overhead any
comment
each
aubaubparsgrsph overhead each the
peregrepl,
the
and
for
paragraph
and In I before
part
One ilne,
araa.wide, part
6CENiew/FuilTest.html?orlgtnaLlonContextdQcumanttoc&IranaItlonTyp,..
or
in
hearIng,
governing the
review,
Couniy
xouniy Sn tire
or
rsltabillfy escosa necessity
is
of
or
of
deacilbing
county
require opponunity
itansmtasiori
proposed and
hearing line, construction
dalton, and ssch
qusilf’,ad trsnsmiaaion a
of
(1 of
county
evaluation, or
(1)01
or
)(lv) a.generatlr,g hoid
of
the
necessity
and
Including
body
municipal
county
or
municipal
risk,
in
69,000
ihe
Overhead date,
gsnerallng
municlpei end
a
each iocei this I
the
lobe
generator
in
of
publIc appfcant o(
for
a
which
(v)
within One,
peraon
work
the
of
brie
the
tine,
and
of genaratiori
or
station
or
qualified
generator
‘ead
me
3/6 10)412017
htlpe;IIt
,rtsxt.wesitaw.com/Document/N8CO
§
7.207.
convenIence (a)
(I) tistefi
(5))l) )4)(l) hearing or lteraated
which (2) line, ii) teed
(3)
(I) only
that (2) sanrica;
Tire For
of
generatIng (II) proposed cost-affecilve are
(Ii) (H) hearing
fleer (If) ifi) it) (e) (iv)
(vi) administreior any )i( )vli) where sounly (Ii) proposed
the the
Certificate
icr
require laIrs
2. in 1
or
he
line Beiow the On an the The The The
lire
sitar economics; Commission
aviation familiar the
esthetics: hiatoric when
any
be subsection stale generating ire
a racommandeilon
enact
qualified
each
at county
applicant
the
aisblliy generating conairuotton
hnal consisiency on:
and
etfrts any intormattonet Commission
Commiasion or at
10 State
due sit avettabtltiy portion
end
as
to
a sppflcebie the isest day muntcipei
to modIfy
public staiton, oi
parties.
sctlon to portion
sites; public sefty
ba
an of
consideration
be
necessity or
the
manner,
time, of
unit, the
generator to
of
end
pubtic
complies ongoing
ConsIderations
coated municipal 17 (a) of station; looetsd;
f-a shii
resolve
a
generating
entrance
residents station: or. the
hearing,
as
the
by
overhead ci end public of of rettabilily
ot
of room
Federal
corporation
strait shaH
an etgn
the aIr FInal
determined this take Slate the
means convenience an 22
coneirucdon oi notice
only
to ahall
afid
condition
application
ieSd and any and
overhead the
with: inches
number generating
application
hearing,
section, 11 identify ensure required allow corporation
of final
of
action the
units
ot
Ff1 after
Avtetton of
iation, governing allow
issues water trarrarniselon
of
the
for
line the
the
the
Commission
actlon
the each
657C
In
where
betore
the
need
due building
preabrrtetion InitIal
by Is
additional
of county
end
tIre
an seprasentailvee size.
by
electric under
transmission of
pollulton;
public
for end
proposed gresanted
the required
the overheed station
with
Adminisvstlon;
State
Informetionat
considerallon the
it in Commission CommIssion on
to subject
a
reoommendaltone, body any
cartificata final
E7Bfl78CD742OF4 necessity
Maryland which
ceritficata
meet
or subparagraph an generating
the
in
hearing
line,
system;
unit
portion
Is
municipal
optione which
shall
applicatIon
of
and
Umety comprehensive
action
to
proposed
of
by and transmission existing
any
or
each
line
be
5
the
coordinate
a
qualified
Aviatlon
of through
the requtred days of
ci shell: recommendetiona
ci
sign portion
county
iocated;
of:
disposet
for
required
on public station,
pubtic county
In
each
the
pubito
corporation,
public
end
providing,
addition
(or (i)
application after shall
to
generating
of
other of be
or Slate Adrninteiretton
generator
a hearing: future
convenience
before
line, convenience or
lSCENiew/PuitText.hfmi?origtnetionContextedocurnanttoc&trsnsltionTyp,..
overhead with of
hearing
certIficate this
tire plan be the municipal
located.
municipal
wastes
to
typas posted
unit
or
conciueion coneiructiori
paragraph
the
demand In
end
tire
cønsirucllcn
qualified
end
an
sfetlan
will to
teed governing
from
considerations
zoning of
produced transmission
corporation of efficient
sit
prominently
end
be
corporation media
and
efid
public
for line
during
aeon
Is
held,
of shalt: generator
necessity
etnciric
necessity of
of tire
Is
the
thai snd body
each
Of
by tire
generation
at
in
etstioi,
or
qualified
generator
lead
iina
Slats
4/6 0/4/2011
htips://1
,next.vnestIaw.coml000Urtl
§
7.207.
construction (g)(1) end
Acts Added Credits Cci. c. Ads
c. 12 1,
Formerly Revisor’s 1, Editors
(2) svbs8ctiofl ci
all, •t0 elf, 174,
(I)
(It) to maintenance of Federal
2011;
(I) transmission
(II)
least
1, 2000,
2013.
A Car
The
the
li
Oct. Juiy a
the
all by
Art, § the This 1998; for in crllflcaie § privately lrr’utsseciion clarity.
irs to clerity. rn rnurrtcipsi recommendatiOnS that
in ateliort In convenience thet
public
county”
or
relevant
1,
1, obligaflons
Acts 2 ongoIng
subsection Acts
Commission subsections Nois ficale the aubaecUona Art, Notes FsOerei
ike
the subsection
1,2007; Maryland
a.
c. 1,2017;
clarity. 78
eli. years
sit,
Energy of
secilon the
ike
Ada only
209,
500,
intmdrrdiOry ‘ares’
iormer
78,
an elrporl
2012
or §
t998, Oct.
(Acts Oct. Conatrucllon
CommIssion
Commission
01 owned
54k
line of
of
ovorhaad agreements overhead corporelton as
lithe
§
operaiion § Aviation 1999, §
pubfio
Acts
Acts Is Regulatory
the
public 54A, 1,2006;
2 nlItd
1,2015;
,r 1,
AviatIon being Imposed (b) c.843,
anu/N8CO and c. (o)(f) wilt ra(erence
1998,
runway,
(e)(2)
new
(do
(d)(2)
may elf,
all,
rnunlclp5i
6, overhead runway
airport
of
c. 2011,
2017,
not
necessity”
convenience
§ of, 1),
language
convenience July Oct. language
this 3, open
of Adrnlnlslralion
c,
Iranarrrl5storr
tranamieelon niol of 2.
§ and
Ads
hold ond Acts oonsiilute
lake by
(9(,
respectively Administration §
in this
8):
unless:
by with of
this
I, elf,
o.63, runway
11 c.
seotion,
Commission
has
1, to I,
1, aulhorlze,
a
to
which melntonansa
elf. trarrmisaton
(sf1), and F5 the
640, o,porellofl’
transmIssion a
2006,c. 2000; section, tlnsi generating eli. eminent 2016,c. 2013;
Oct.
LEGiSLATIVE
section,
PJM
Ike
been
1 out
is
of
June
derIved
§1,
North
607C
(3) July
§ added
action shall
subsection
public
1.
a
any and the
and respectively, Acm
interconnectIon,
public Acts
I,
line
nd
hazard line
aft,
on
1998.
determines
Ike the 1,2012; and
830.
1,
464,
the elf.
II America reference
domaIn, portIon
qualIfy necessity
riaceeeiiy related
concurs
file
wllhou)
April
1999; is 2001, sietion
“on
(sf1) 2013, wilhout that
lot E76876C0742DF4
governing reference are
of Cot,
reference a hearing
line,
proposed
§
Amended §1, lines
with
ciarily. person
to
the an
I, Is NOTES
aubSUIslad
12, (a)
Acts of Ads
as
sir c.
of 12017.
0.
oil.
algnad to
elf. Electric
application or
substantive
Ike overhead 01 lOt in
restriction,
to tIre near
ci
855,
2011; this thai 501, a
undar navigation; required
with,
ha ow3rhsrad
that this
June
condamnetlorr Dot. 2012,c. publIc
this may accuracy. to
1999,
Federal
body
L.L.C., to
correlrvcllon
to
by section, orrgolng
the
en §
airport §
“electric”
sacUon,
detarminatlon. to
wlih
Acts
Reliability or eailon,
lids
12016;
1,
Acts not
1,
1,2006;
lot
appticallcn
of
conetruction
c.4,
aIrport
considar located” transmission
at!.
at!. (or before
or
change
644, end
Aviation Ike saction undertake,
trarrani,’sdrn 2011,
ha
I
and
1998,
Ike
Its runway 5CENiew/FvlfText.htmi7orIgtneIIonContextdocumerrltoc&trensltJonTyp,,,
a operation Oct.
Oct.
§
tire
COUfliy
asrvlca the torwm
certifIcate
wIthin
Acts
1,8(1.
§ runway successors,
Acts Of
reiererrcae
Council
conslruotlon
c.84,
is requirement
felt,
lire 1,2001;
Is 1,
rsqiiroment
0. the (rorn
for
is
Administration
added
2017, Sub5lttL)tad 2013;
653
2007
of
July or rafstcn4es
added
I
generating
lIne;
a
he
a
§ and
mile undo’
former June err
edied
of inc and
1,
§
1, Acts
tot
C. Acts
overhead
public c.
end
elf,
1. 0
of
Io’
related for
1999;
392,
I,
183,
ho a ihls
ott. of
Itker
April
2005,
2015, 2012l
ganerekon
§
for
§
station
or
qualified
generator
lasd
IIn
I
Statu
5/6 10/412017
httpe://1
We,I,aw,
.next,waallaw,corrr(DocumanVNBCO1l
t
§
sorm
7.20?.
I
Current MD
End Document
Notes
rhomon
Code
of
CertifIcate
a1etio in Aiao nonboesti AdminIstration” in recetved Adminiatretion’
in Defined “Peraon”
C0unty Conalrucliorr Eiectric
through
avbaecticn
eubaectlon subsection of
Raorere
Public
In
DeOi8Iona
or
eubeactlo
terms:
cornpany
§
fuel
overhead
all by
of
Utifltiee,
1.101
1-101
legIslatIon
the Prloacy
public
(e)(3)
(et(3)(vli)
(f)(1XH)
generating
§
‘Ccrr’mtasion”
is to
Commiseton
7207
subefituted
reflect
(11)
(e)(3)(vti)
Slaromant
§
§ convenience transmieaiorr of
1-10 7-207,
of
thia
from
of
this
lire
otatiorr
P61 1
aection,
his
C
MD of
the section,
current
20r7
for
after
6B7C AccenIhIy
eetIOn,
this
1-101
2017
PUELIC
the
ilna is
Thomeon end
July
the
aectiorr,
deleted
11
name
former
the
riecesetty is Raguer
E7S878CD7420P41
the reference
I,
added
relorerroe
UTII.
Reuteri,
1081
former Siprl,r
of
se
the rs(erenoe
the
aurpiusage, Seeeion
§
far •
former
required
is
7-207
No to unit,
Term,
reference
clarity,
dietad
to
the
)acm
the
to
reference
of
effect
the
0
CsrrrpcL
“Maryland
before
the
OrI;rn,i
as
5CENI8w/FuilTeot.htmi?originetionContext=dooumenttoc&trensitionTyp,,,
to
Slate
General
obaolete.
ct
any
U,
U.S.
constructIon to
he
Aviation
appltcationa basil
Aviation
genaratin
t.eoo•Rs.A7-r?
Oov,rrmanl
Assembly
fuel
or
of
Wori.
generation
1.COO-mO.255e)
elation .
Improve
or
quaffled
Wiiriow
generator
t;
r
lead
sv.noo
line
cr,r’s
Statu
8/6 N THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION * BEFORE THE OF BLUEGRASS SOLAR, LLC FOR A PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE * OF MARYLAND AND NECESSITY TO CONSTRUCT AN 80 MW SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC GENER- * ATING FACILITY IN QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND * CASE NO. 9496
Issued: May 14, 2019
PUBLIC UTILITY LAW JUDGE’S NOTICE OF SECOND PUBLIC COMMENT HEARING
On November 13, 2018, Bluegrass Solar, LLC (“the Applicant”) filed an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for authority to construct an 80.0 megawatt solar photovoltaic generating facility in Queen Anne’s County, Maryland
(“the Project”).1 The Applicant proposes to construct the Project on an approximately
487-acre portion of approximately 539 acres of privately-owned land, identified as Tax
Map 11, Parcel 24, and Tax Map 17, Parcels 4 and 24 in Election District 2, located north of
Church Hill, east of State Route 213, north of State Route 300, and southeast of
Chestertown, in Queen Anne’s County.
The second evening hearing for the purpose of receiving comments from the public on the application has been scheduled as follows:
June 18, 2019 Church Hill Elementary School 6:30 p.m. 631 Main Street Church Hill, Maryland 21623
The application is available for public inspection or copying at the Queen Annes County Office of Planning & Zoning, 110 Vincit Street, Centreville, Maryland 21617. Additionally, all pleadings in this matter may be viewed or downloaded from the electronic docket file (9496) available through the Commission’s website, www.psc.state.md.us.
9
0
Q
the
of
website
2019,
Service
scheduled
any
reference
19,
proceeding.
on
locations
the
Public
must
June
currently
of and
in
the
is
and
Hearing
need
and
and
home
of
filed
written
dates
the
use
hearing
and
with
its
be
notice
hearing.
hearing
media
Maryland
now
a
display
hearing
21202 and
disposal
location
on
immediately
times,
may
Comment
comments
which
circulation
a
its
individual
residents
evening
the
location
social
including
post
postings
at
evening
time,
by
an
Public
as
the
evidentiary
between
evening
weeks
and website)
and
Secretary,
Twitter,
public
the
comments
Maryland
of
general
a
used and
the
that
County
date,
date
the
or
of
publicize
time
of
hearing, Second
so
hearing,
date,
has
of
date
to
the
of
the
written
County;
date
hearing
any
written
to:
the
Anne’s
successive
Executive
date:
time,
routinely
the
and
filed.
to
Baltimore,
which
manner
evening Notice
Additionally,
communication
disposal
the publication
filed
evening
a
location
by
be
newspaper
Anne’s
four
which
the
of
Applicant
two
its
the
of
determine
a
as
be
in
Queen
directed
prior
the
of
before
filed.
at
hearing date
and
Floor,
of
by
in to
the
Romine,
may
post
the
number,
hearing
or
be
least
the
may
to
J.
Queen
such
of
(if
after
have
means
notify
link
16th
on
time
weeks
hereby
date
at
the
hearing
case
and
must
notice
filed.3
is
evening
may
day
the
of
each
invited
Terry on
purpose
be page
the
four
other
it
date,
certificate(s)
comments
the
to
further
in
Street,
the
also
a
comments
click
comment
that
evening
may
any
and
Post the
to
platforms,
throughout
caption, advertisement
Publish the
least
is
comments
Paul
Applicant
Commission
website File
not
until purpose
public
the
At
•
•
Once
before
public
matter
St.
written
•
•
•
The
Written addressed
platform
for
6
of
the
be
2019.
to
9496,2
set
media
20,
hearing
one
No.
party
should
June
social
Only Any
evening
for or
2
‘Case
Commission, and • Prominently post on the day of the hearing, no later than noon (EST), an informational sign at or near the public entrance(s) of Church Hill Elementary School. Each sign shall be at least 17 inches by 22 inches in size and state the time, room number, and subject of the public hearing. The font size of the lettering shall be greater than 48 point size and as large as the sign allows. The Applicant shall submit an affidavit certifying that the necessary properly sized information sign(s) were posted, as directed, including the time the signs were posted and a photograph of the informational sign near or at the public entrance(s) of Church Hill Elementary School, 631 Main Street. Church Hill, Maryland 21623, which shall be filed with the Commission within two business days after the public hearing date(s).
11 2 TEL: 410-632-1194 FAX: 410-632-3131 E-MAIL: admin @co.worcesier.md.us WEB: www.co.worcester.rnd.us
COMMISSIONERS HAROLD L. HIGGINS, CPA OFFICE OF THE CHIEFADMINISTRATIVEOFFICER DIANA PURNELL, PRESIDENT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAUREEN F.L. HOWARTH JOSEPH lvi. MITRECIC, VICE PRESIDENT COUNTY ATTORNEY ANTHONY W. BERTINO, JR. MADISON J. BUNTING, JR. ilnrceIrr JAMES C. CHURCH Iounhi2 GOVERNMENT CENTER THEODORE J. ELDER
JOSHUA C. NORDSTROM ONE WEST MARKET STREET • ROOM 1103 SNOW HILL, MARYLAND 21863-1195 ‘‘f-,, —_ : — May 14, 2019
Steven Wilson, President Gregg A. Todd, County Administrator Queen Anne’s County Commissioners Queen Anne’s County 107 North Liberty Street 107 North Liberty Street Centreville, MD 21617 Centreville, MD21617
RE: Request for Support of State Legislation for Single-Family Residential Fire Sprinkler Waiver Provision
Dear President Wilson, County Administrator Todd, and Commissioners:
Please be advised that the Worcester County Commissioners recently sent the attached letter and supporting documents to the members of the Eastern Shore Delegation requesting their introduction and support of State legislation to address our concerns regarding the requirement of the International Residential Building Code and the State of Maryland’s adoption thereof which requires automatic fire sprinkler systems in all new single-family dwellings in the State. As you are aware, in a rural county such as Worcester County and throughout much of the Eastern Shore, Western Shore and Southern Maryland, where public water supplies are limited, this State mandate costs individuals building their home thousands of extra dollars in construction costs for the automatic fire sprinkler system, including the pipes, pumps, tanks and conditioned storage sheds required to install such systems on properties served by private water wells as opposed to public water infrastructure. Oftentimes this extra cost has prevented first-time home buyers and others fiom being able to afford to purchase a new home. Also here in Worcester County and other Eastern Shore counties which border the States of Virginia and Delaware which do not have an automatic fire sprinkler mandate, our local home builders are unable to compete with home builders in these adjacent states which has a significantly negative impact on our local economy. Therefore, we believe that the requirement for installing an automatic fire sprinkler system in single-family homes should not be mandatory, but rather that all new single-family home owners should have the right to choose for themselves whether or not they wish to install this additional safety feature in their new home.
Citizens and Government Working Together 12 May 14, 2019 Page 2
Our request is to simply remove the mandatory requirement of automatic fire sprinkler systems in all new single-family dwellings in the State. We understand and support the requirement of automatic fire sprinkler systems in apartments, townhouses and two-family dwellings where multiple families live under the same roof, but we strongly believe that single- family property owners should be permitted to decide for themselves whether or not they prefer to install an automatic fire sprinkler system in their new home.
We are hereby asking for your support of this legislation once it is introduced during the next State legislative session and we encourage you to contact your local State delegation to sign on as co-sponsors and to support the passage of this bill. We thank you for your consideration in joining together with other Maryland counties who are similarly affected to encourage the introduction and passage of this proposed legislation. 4) Sincerely,-f Diana Purnell President
13 TEL: 410-632-1194 FAX: 410-632-3131 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEB: www.co.worcester.rnd.us
COMMISSIONERS HAROLDL. HIGGINS, CPA OFFICE CHIEFADMINISTRATIVEOFFICER DIANAPURNELL, PRESIDENT OF THE COUNTh’COMMISSIONERS MAUREEN FL. HOWARTH JOSEPH M. MITRECIC, VICEPRESIDENT COUNTYATTORNEY ANTHONY W. BERTINO, JR. MADISON J. BUNTING, JR. lnrcrtr !Inuntg JAMES C. CHURCH THEODORE J. ELDER GOVERNMENT CENTER JOSHUA C. NORDSTROM ONE WEST MARKETSTREET ROOM 1103 SNOW HILL, MARYLAND 21863-1195
May 10, 2019
Senate Delegation for the Eastern Shore House Delegation for the Eastern Shore 11 Bladen Street 6 Bladen Street Annapolis, MD 21401 Annapolis,MD 21401
Honorable Senator Mary Beth Carozza Honorable Senator Stephen S. Hershey, Jr. 314 James Senate Office Building 420 James Senate Office Building
Honorable Senator Adelaide C. Eckardt Honorable Delegate Charles J. Otto 322 James Senate Office Building 321 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Wayne A. Hartman Honorable Delegate Christopher T. Adams 308 House Office Building 426 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Sheree Sample-Hughes Honorable Delegate Johnny Mautz 427 House Office Building 424 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Carl Anderton, Jr. Honorable Delegate Steven J. Arentz 310 House Office Building 308 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Jefferson L. Ghrist Honorable Delegate Jay A. Jacobs 430 House Office Building 321 House Office Building
RE: Requested Legislation for Single-Family Residential Fire Sprinkler Waiver Provision
Dear Distinguished Senators and Delegates Representing the Eastern Shore:
Please be advised that the Worcester County Commissioners recently continued our discussion with respect to concerns regarding the requirement of the International Residential Building Code and the State of Maryland’s adoption thereof, which requires automatic fire sprinkler systems in all new single-family dwellings in the State. We are seeking your support for the introduction and passage of State legislation to address our concerns which we believe are
Citizens and Government Working Together 14
15
(
the
our
an
only such
July
to
is
is
we
home
single
permit
prefer
the
it together
single-
from
to
and
which
have
that
The
Building
Otto,
for
to
including
on
their
the
there State
they Specifically,
adjacent
we
that
sprinkler
the
Worcester
effective
left
counties
Oftentimes in
some
afford
Performance
Home
to
not joining
Office
that building
as
builder
Maryland,
that
fire
damage,
be
sprinkler
subsection
counties
to
removed
these
Adams,
in
two-family
system,
or
systems
program
two-family
rural
why
our
attached).
12-504(a)(1)(iii)
believe
building
in
be
fire
fire
such
note
introduce
able
and
become
attached).
on
owner,
Shore above
new
PS
should such
contained
Building to
-
Southern
General’s
(copy
you
waiver
automatic
whether
for
box
the
understand
sprinkler
affected
reduce
Delegates
Please
being
county
amendments
letter
strongly
builders
was
infrastructure.
Single-Family
and
that
dwellings
the
install
we
understand
automatic
by
of
fire
a
individuals Eastern
Section
consideration
systems
we
property
Safety
from
to
from
rural
local
19
an
in
dwellings
townhouses
and/or
can
home
water
a
Attorney
and
economy.
policy
proposed
the
but
Shore
your
similarly
costs
check-off
other
such (copy
While
for
In
request
Provisions”
Bill themselves
weaken
one-”
a
attached).
by
We
have
our home.
.
lives
with adopt
others
for
“Public
new requirements
.
local
and roof,
law
automatic
for
required
public
to
not law.
“.
request (see
“and
install single-family
and
new
Maryland
to
and
save
Our
our
Western
the House
Maryland
two-family
mandate
do
to
Systems
same represent
State
of
provide
not
sheds
as
on
entitled
systems.
Maryland.
compete
State
for
decide
the
only
County
their
to
completed
home
may
sprinkler
and
respectfully
do
County
not requirement
the
waiver
implement
buyers to
to
State
matter
who
by
in
Shore,
be
which Code
or
opposed
that
we
fire
2016
costs from
this
current
and
one-
to
impact
storage is
this
eliminating
this
as
Sprinkler
under
complexes.
home
13,
the
sprinkler
systems
system
to
unable
by
introduced
proposed
system
and
Worcester
Eastern
throughout standards
under
Worcester
live
Form
Fire
whether
permitted
wells
Maryland
are
mandated
learned
in
Delaware
single-family
concerns,
suggest
the was as
to
Annotated
limited,
negative
be
removing
local
not
January
simply
of
and
first-time
amendment
construction
sprinkler
here
sprinkler the
enforcing attention
are
recently apartment
water
conditioned
since
new
automatic
sprinkler
counties
such
on
Waiver
these
the
with
families
a
in
and
of
decision
which
would
that
builders
permitted
fire
if
Delegation
should
for
had
and
and
townhouses
much
Also local
your
fire
for
have
throughout
we
the
a
rural
that
not
issue
private
we
for
Virginia
for
supplies
Buckel
continue we
home
is
dollars
address
to
significantly
Amendments
prevented
Article
Shore
tanks
intended.
believe
that
by
residential
of
multiple
Sprinider
a
to
owners
to
other
take
home.
end,
a
adopt
permit
you
as
and
jurisdiction
has
Standards
automatic
a
local
homeowner We
water
extra
has
automatic
Fire
for
Local
throughout
legislators
townhouses
Safety
difference
that
similar
may
new
States able
-
where
served requirements
of
for
order
feeling
pumps,
cost
Eastern
many
an
program
that our
local
a
however,
provisions
Thank
2019
planned
To
a homes
and
Arentz
In be
property
the
by
public
which
other
2
10,
extra
Public
pipes,
2019,
install
waiver
with
Standards.’ family
1,
systems would
a allows
Performance
the
dwellings,
always
applicant
application
Residential
family
dwellings to
legislators
significant
Standards
Ghrist, mandated
legislation
states
mandate,
this border
purchase
thousands
collective the
argument single-family properties
County
shared where
May
Maryland Page home. cc:
for be requirement
encourage
Page May iviaiyiaiiu
mandatory,
themselves
10,
3 Bill Ed Maureen Jeff
Thanks
2019 Tudor, jaLcju
McMahon, them Bradshaw,
for
but
whether Howarth,
again
installing Director
to ivi
rather
sign Building Fire
for County
of on or Marshal
your
that Development
an
not
to Administrator/County
automatic
your
all
consideration Attorney
they
new
proposed
wish
single-family President Diana
Sincerely, Review
fire
to
install
sprinkler
Pumell
and
legislation. & Permitting Engineer
support.
this
home
system
additional
In
owners
summary,
in
single-family
safety
should
we
feature
have
believe
homes
the
in
that
their right
should
the
new
to
choose
not
16 TEL: 410-632-1194 FAX: 410-632-3131 E-MAIL: adrnin @co.worcester.md.us WEB: www.co.worcester.md.us
COMMISSIONERS HAROLDL. HIGGINS, CPA OFFICE OF THE CHIEFADMINISTRATIVEOFFICER DIANAPURNELL, PRESIDENT COUNW COMMISSIONERS MAUREEN FL. HOWARTH M. MITRECIC, VICEPRESIDENT JOSEPH COUNTYATYORNEY ANTHONY W. BERTINO, JR. MADISON J. BUNTING,JR. ftnrci±r LTunt JAMES C. CHURCH THEODOIE J. ELDER GOVERNMENT CENTER JOSHUA C. NORDSTROM ONE WEST MARKETSTREET ROOM 1103 SNOW HILL, MARYLAND 21863-1195
May 10, 2019
Senate Delegation for the Eastern Shore House Delegation for the Eastern Shore 11 Bladen Street 6 Bladen Street Annapolis,MD 21401 Annapolis, MD 21401
Honorable Senator Mary Beth Carozza Honorable Senator Stephen S. Hershey, Jr. 314 James Senate Office Building 420 James Senate Office Building
Honorable Senator Adelaide C. Eckardt Honorable Delegate Charles J. Otto 322 James Senate Office Building 321 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Wayne A. Hartman Honorable Delegate Christopher T. Adams 308 House Office Building 426 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Sheree Sample-Hughes Honorable Delegate Johnny Mautz 427 House Office Building 424 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Carl Anderton, Jr. Honorable Delegate Steven J. Arentz 310 House Office Building 308 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Jefferson L. Ghrist Honorable Delegate Jay A. Jacobs 430 House Office Building 321 House Office Building
RE: Requested Legislation for Single-Family Residential Fire Sprinkler Waiver Provision
Dear Distinguished Senators and Delegates Representing the Eastern Shore:
Please be advised that the Worcester County Commissioners recently continued our discussion with respect to concerns regarding the requirement of the International Residential Building Code and the State of Maryland’s adoption thereof, which requires automatic fire sprinkler systems in all new single-family dwellings in the State. We are seeking your support for the introduction and passage of State legislation to address our concerns which we believe are
Citizens and Government Working Together 17
18
(
the
our
an
only
such
July
to
is
is
home
we
single
permit
prefer
the
it
together
single-
from
to
and
which
have
that
The
Building
Otto,
for
to
including
on
their
the
there
State
they
Specifically,
adjacent
we
that
sprinider
the
Worcester
effective
left
counties
Oftentimes
in
some
afford
Performance
Home
to
not joining
Office
that
as
building
builder
Maryland,
that
fire
damage,
be
sprinkler
subsection
counties
to
removed
these
Adams,
two-family
in
system,
or
systems
program
two-family
rural
why
our
attached).
building
12-504(a)(1)(iii)
believe
in
be
fire
fire
such
note
introduce
able
and
become
on attached).
owner,
Shore above
new
PS
should such
contained
Building to
-
Southern
(copy General’s
you
waiver
automatic
whether
for
understand box
the
sprinkler
affected
reduce
being
Please
Delegates
county
amendments
letter
strongly
builders
infrastructure. was
Single-Family
and
that
dwellings
install
the
we
understand
automatic
of
by
fire
a
individuals
Eastern
Section
consideration
systems
we
property
Safety
from
to
from
rural
local
19
an
in
townhouses
dwellings
and/or
can
home
water
a
Attorney
and
economy.
policy
proposed
the
but
Shore
your
costs
similarly
check-off
other
such
While (copy
for
In
request
Provisions”
themselves
Bill
weaken
one-”
a
We attached).
by
have
home.
our
lives .
with
others adopt
“Public
for
new requirements
.
local
and roof,
law
automatic
required for
public
to
not law.
“.
request (see
install “and
single-family
and
new
to
Maryland
and
save
Our
our
Western
the House
Maryland
two-family
mandate
do
to
Systems
represent
same
State
provide
of
not
sheds
as
on
entitled
systems.
Maryland. State
compete
for
decide
only
the
County
their
to
home
may
completed
sprinkler
and
respectfully
do
not County
requirement
the
waiver
implement
to
buyers
to
State
matter
who
by
in
Shore,
be
which Code
or
opposed
that
we
fire
2016
costs
from
this
current
and
one-
to
impact
storage is
eliminating
this
this
as
Sprinkler
under
complexes.
home
13,
the
systems sprinkler
system
to
unable
by
introduced
system proposed
and
Worcester
Eastern
throughout
standards
under
live
Worcester
Form
Fire
whether
permitted
wells
Maryland
mandated are
learned
in
Delaware
single-family
concerns,
suggest
the was
to as
Annotated
limited,
negative
be
removing
local
not
January
simply
of
and
first-time
construction
amendment
sprinkler
here
are the
sprinkler
attention
enforcing
conditioned recently apartment
water
since
new
automatic
sprinkler
counties
such
on
Waiver
these
the
with
families
in a
and
of
decision
which
would
that
builders
permitted
fire
if
Delegation
should
for
had and
and
townhouses
much
Also
local
your
fire
for
have
throughout
we
the
rural
a
that
not
issue
private
we
for
Virginia
for
supplies
Buckel
continue we
home
dollars
is
address
to
significantly
prevented Amendments
Article
Shore
tanks
intended.
that
believe
by
residential
of
multiple
Sprinkler
a
to
owners
to
other
take
home.
end,
a
adopt
permit
you
as
and
jurisdiction
has
automatic
Standards
a
local
homeowner
We
water
extra
has
automatic
Fire
for
Local
throughout
legislators
townhouses
difference
Safety
that
similar
new
may
States
- able
where
of served
requirements
order for
feeling
pumps,
Eastern many
cost
that
our an
program
a
local
however,
provisions
2019
Thank
To planned
and a homes
In
Arentz
be
property
the
by
public
which
other
2
10,
extra
Public
pipes,
install
waiver
with
Standards.’ family
1,2019,
systems
would
a allows
dwellings, the Performance
always
applicant
application
Residential
family
dwellings
to
Standards
significant legislators
Ghrist, mandated
legislation
states
mandate,
this border
the purchase
County
shared collective where
argument single-family thousands properties
May
Maryland Page Marylarni tastem flore L)elegatlon May 10, 2019 Page 3 encourage them to sign on to your proposed legislation. In summary, we believe that the requirement for installing an automatic fire sprinkler system in single-family homes should not be mandatory, but rather that all new single-family home owners should have the right to choose for themselves whether or not they wish to install this additional safety feature in their new home. Thanks again for your consideration and support. LLWSincerely, Diana Pumell President cc: Maureen Howarth, County Attorney Ed Tudor, Director of Development Review & Permitting Bill Bradshaw, Building Administrator/County Engineer Jeff McMahon, Fire Marshal
19 TEL: 410-632-1194 ‘ FAX: 410-632-3131 E-MAIL: admin @co.worcester.mdus WEB: wwwco.worcesler.mdus
COMMISSIONERS HAROLDL. HIGGINS, CPA DIANAPURNELL, PRESIDENT OFFICE OF THE CHIEFADMINISTRATIVEOFFICER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAUREEN JOSEPH M. MITRECIC, VICEPRESIDENT FL. HOWARTI-I COUNTYATtORNEY ANTHONY W. BERTINO, JR. MADISON J. BUNTING,JR. Inunti CHURCH nrctrr JAMES C. THEODORE J. ELDER GOVERNMENT CENTER JOSHUA C. NORDSTROM ONE WEST MARKETSTREET ROOM 1103
SNOW HILL, MARYLAND 21863-1195
May 10, 2019
Senate Delegation for the Eastern Shore House Delegation for the Eastern Shore 11 Bladen Street 6 Bladen Street Annapolis, MD 21401 Annapolis, MD 21401
Honorable Senator Mary Beth Carozza Honorable Senator Stephen S. Hershey, Jr. 314 James Senate Office Building 420 James Senate Office Building
Honorable Senator Adelaide C. Eckardt Honorable Delegate Charles J. Otto 322 James Senate Office Building 321 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Wayne A. Hartman Honorable Delegate Christopher T. Adams 308 House Office Building 426 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Sheree Sample-Hughes Honorable Delegate Johnny Mautz 427 House Office Building 424 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Carl Anderton, Jr. Honorable Delegate Steven J. Arentz 310 House Office Building 308 House Office Building
Honorable Delegate Jefferson L. Ghrist Honorable Delegate Jay A. Jacobs 430 House Office Building 321 House Office Building
RE: Requested Legislation for Single-Family Residential Fire Sprinkler Waiver Provision
Dear Distinguished Senators and Delegates Representing the Eastern Shore:
Please be advised that the Worcester County Commissioners recently continued our discussion with respect to concerns regarding the requirement of the International Residential Building Code and the State of Maryland’s adoption thereof, which requires automatic fire sprinkler systems in all new single-family dwellings in the State. We are seeking your support for the introduction and passage of State legislation to address our concerns which we believe are
Citizens and Government Working Together 20
21
the
our
an
only such
July
to
is
is
we
home
single
permit
prefer
the
it
together
single-
from
to
and
which
have
that
The
Building
Otto,
for
to
including
on
their
the
there State
they Specifically,
adjacent
we
that
sprinkler
the
Worcester
effective
left
counties
in
Oftentimes
afford some
Performance
Home
to
not joining
Office
that
building
as
builder
Maryland,
that
fire
damage,
be
sprinkler
subsection
counties
to
removed
these
Adams,
two-family
in
system,
or
systems
program
two-family
rural
why
our
attached).
12-504(a)(1)(iii)
building believe
in
be
fire
fire
such
note
introduce
able
and
become
on attached).
owner,
above
Shore
new
PS
should
such
contained
Building to
-
Southern
General’s
(copy
you
waiver
automatic
whether
for
box the
understand
sprinkler
affected
reduce
being Delegates
Please
county
amendments
letter
strongly
builders
was
infrastructure.
Single-Family
and
that
dwellings
install the
we
understand
automatic
of
by
fire
a
individuals Eastern
Section
consideration
systems
we
property
Safety
from
to
from
rural
local
19
an
in
townhouses
dwellings
and/or
can
home
water
a
Attorney
and
economy.
policy
proposed
the
but
Shore
your
similarly
costs
check-off
other
such (copy
While
for
In
request
Provisions”
themselves
Bill
weaken
one-”
a
We attached).
by
have
our home.
.
lives
with
adopt
others
for
“Public
new requirements
.
local
roof,
and
law
automatic
for
required
public
to
not law.
“.
request (see
“and
install single-family
and
new
Maryland
to
and
save
Our
our
Western
Maryland
House
the
two-family
mandate
do
to
Systems
represent
same
State
of
provide
not
sheds
as
on
entitled
systems.
Maryland.
compete
State
for decide
only
the
County
their
to
completed
may home
sprinkler
and
respectfully
do
County
not requirement
the
waiver
implement
buyers
to
to
State
matter
who
by
in
Shore,
be
Code
which
or
opposed
that
we
fire
2016
costs
from
this
current
and
one-
to
impact
storage is
this
eliminating
this as
Sprinkler
under
complexes.
home
13,
the
sprinkler
systems
system
to
unable
by
introduced
proposed
system
and
Worcester
Eastern
throughout
standards
under
Worcester
live
Fire
Form
whether
permitted
wells
Maryland
are
mandated
learned
in
Delaware
single-family
concerns,
suggest
was
as
the to
Annotated
limited,
negative
removing be
local
not
January
simply
of
and
first-time
amendment
construction
sprinkler
here
the
sprinkler
attention
are
enforcing
apartment
recently
conditioned
water
since
new
automatic
sprinkler
counties
such
on
Waiver
these
the
with
families
a
in
and
of
decision
which
would
that
builders
permitted
fire if
Delegation
should
for
had and
and
townhouses
much
Also
local your
fire
for
have
throughout
we
the
a
rural
that
not
issue
we
private
for
Virginia
for
supplies
Buckel
continue we
home
is
dollars
address
to
significantly
prevented Amendments
Article
Shore
tanks
intended.
believe
that
by
of residential
multiple
Sprinkler
a
to
owners
to
other
take
home.
end,
a
adopt
permit
you
as
and
jurisdiction
has
Standards
automatic
a
local
homeowner
We
water
extra
has
automatic
Fire
for
Local
throughout
legislators
townhouses
Safety
difference
that
similar
may
new
States able
-
where
served requirements
of
for
order
feeling
pumps,
Eastern cost
many
that an
our
program
local
a
however,
provisions
2019
Thank
planned
To
homes
a
and
In Arentz be
property
the
by
public
which
other
2
10,
extra
Public
pipes,
2019,
install
waiver
with
Standards.” family
1,
systems would
allows
a
the Performance
applicant dwellings,
always
application
Residential
family
dwellings
to
Standards
significant legislators
Ghrist, mandated
legislation
states
mandate,
this border
purchase
the
properties
collective County
single-family where
argument thousands
shared
Page
May Maryland iviaiyiaiiu taiiii iiui iicicaiiuii May 10, 2019 Page 3 encourage them to sign on to your proposed legislation. In summary, we believe that the requirement for installing an automatic fire sprinkler system in single-family homes should not be mandatory, but rather that all new single-family home owners should have the right to choose for themselves whether or not they wish to install this additional safety feature in their new home. Thanks again for your consideration and support. &LLilfSincerely, Diana Purnell President cc: Maureen Howarth, County Attorney Ed Tudor, Director of Development Review & Permitting Bill Bradshaw, Building Administrator/County Engineer Jeff McMahon, Fire Marshal
22 - 24 23 20 25 22 26 21 15 17 16 14 19 18 11 13 12 0 8 9 6 7 5 4 2 3 1 EXPLANATION: That BY BYaddingto FOR AN Assigned Requested: Introduced By: E4 Public repealing ACT Delegates [Brackets] the the Annotated Article Article Annotated the requiring certain SECTION Section at sprinkler local (2011 generally local Section Standards. shall (2011 concerning a Laws purpose to: Safety application certain and November amendments amendment require Replacement Replacement Environment indicate and — — fire 12—504.1 12—504 of Adams, Public Public read CAPITALS systems the relating — Maryland 1. Code Code of reenacting, sprinkler time Building BE the State repealing matter first of Safety Safety 2, of of IT builder and Otto, this to in 2015 to Maryland Maryland time: IN])ICATE Volume Volume to Fire ENACTED and deleted the certain read the systems to Sprinkler Act; local Performance with the Ghrist, install Marshal Transportation
HOUSE of Maryland January Maryland as from defining a prohibition and and amendments, amendments A buildings; MATTER new follows: provisions BILL existing (PRE—FILED) a BY Arentz, 2015 2015 fire to Systems dwelling 13, THE Building certain Building prepare ENTITLED sprinkler ADDED 2016 Supplement) Supplement) Standards law.
BILL providing on for GENERAL and to adoption to Provisions terms; certain TO certain Performance Performance provide the Buckel system EXISTING
19 that Maryland - making by written dwellings, Local ASSEMBLY certain if under a
IIIll a LAW. local local Standards conforming Standards Amendments
IllI materials; Building certain information jurisdiction the jurisdiction
1111
IIN OF local circumstances;
III regarding that MARYLAND, changes; providing Performance amendment
llII to 61r1031 of to weakens adopts a certain
III Fire buyer
II and fire for a
23 2 HOUSE BILL 19
Article — Public Safety
2 12—504.
3 (a) (1) A local jurisdiction may adopt local amendments to the Standards if the 4 local amendments do not:
5 (i) prohibit the minimum implementation and enforcement 6 activities set forth in § 12—505of this subtitle;
7 (ii) weaken energy conservation and efficiency provisions contained 8 in the Standards; OR
9 [(iii) except as provided in paragraph (3) of this subsection, weaken 10 the automatic fire sprinkler systems provisions for townhouses and one—and two—family 11 dwellings contained in the Standards; or
12 (iv)] (III) weaken wind design and wind—borne debris provisions 13 contained in the Standards.
14 (2) (i) Regardless of whether the International Green Construction 15 Code is adopted by the Department under § 12—503(d)of this subtitle, a local jurisdiction 6 may adopt the International Green Construction Code.
17 (ii) A local jurisdiction may make local amendments to the 18 International Green Construction Code.
19 [(3) Paragraph (1)(iii) of this subsection does not apply to:
20 (i) standards governing issuance of a building permit for a property 21 not connected to an electrical utility; or
22 (ii) until January 1, 2016, standards governing issuance of a 23 building permit for a new one—or two—family dwelling constructed on:
24 1. a lot subject to a valid unexpired public works utility 25 agreement that was executed before March 1, 2011; or
26 2. a lot served by an existing water service line from a water 27 main to the property line that:
28 A. is less than a nominal 1—inchsize;
29 B. is approved and owned by the public or private water 0 system that owns the mains;
31 C. was installed before March 1,2011; and
24 HOUSE BILL 19 3
D. is fully operational from the public or private main to a curb stop or meter pit located at the property line.]
3 (b) If a local jurisdiction adopts a local amendment to the Standards, the 4 Standards as amended by the local jurisdiction apply in the local jurisdiction.
5 (c) If a local amendment conflicts with the Standards, the local amendment 6 prevails in the local jurisdiction.
7 (d) A local jurisdiction that adopts a local amendment to the Standards shall 8 ensure that the local amendment is adopted in accordance with applicable local law.
9 (e) To keep the database established under this subtitle current, a local 10 jurisdiction that adopts a local amendment to the Standards shall provide a copy of the 11 local amendment to the Department:
12 (1) at least 15 days before the effective date of the amendment; or
13 (2) within 5 days after the adoption of an emergency local amendment.
14 12—504.1.
(A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 16 INDICATED.
17 (2) “BUILDER” MEANS A PERSON THAT CONTRACTS WITH A BUYER 18 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DWELLING.
19 (3) “BuYER” MEANS A PERSON THAT PURCHASES ANY ESTATE OR 20 INTEREST IN A NEW DWELLING.
21 (4) “NEw DWELLING” MEANS A NEW ONE- OR TWO-FAMILY 22 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING HAVING THREE STORIES OR FEWER, NOT PREVIOUSLY 23 OCCUPIED, AND CONSTRUCTED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
24 (B) (1) THIS SECTION APPLIES IN A LOCAL JURISDICTION THAT ADOPTS 25 A LOCAL AMENDMENT TO THE STANDARDS THAT WEAKENS THE AUTOMATIC FIRE 26 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS PROVISIONS FOR TOWNHOUSES AND ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY 27 DWELLINGS CONTAINED IN THE STANDARDS.
28 (2) UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THE LOCAL AMENDMENT, THIS 9 SECTION APPLIES TO ANY NEW DWELLING IN THE LOCAL JURISDICTION FOR WHICH (o A CONTRACT HAS BEEN SIGNED BETWEEN THE BUILDER AND THE BUYER ON OR 31 AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE LOCAL AMENDMENT.
25
26
0
OR
OR
-o
July
THE THE
THAT
OF
STATE
OF
PROVIDE
effect
WITH
SYSTEM
DWELLING,
THE
SYSTEM.
TIME
take
BY
MATERIAL
SHALL
NEW
THE
REQUEST
EXPENSE.
A
shall
AT
ON
OF
Act
SYSTEM.
ASSOCIATED
SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER
AND
WRITTEN
this
PREPARED
BUYER’S
THAT,
THAT,
FIRE
FIRE
COSTS
JURISDICTION
That
THE
SECTION;
THE
SPRINKLER
AT
PREPARE
19
OF
REQUIRE
REQUIRE
MATERIAL
CONSTRUCTION
LOCAL
THIS
FIRE
AUTOMATIC
AUTOMATIC
OF
BILL
SHALL
ENACTED,
SYSTEM
FOR
THE
AN
SHALL
AN
SHALL
(E)
IN
OF
WRITTEN
HOUSE
PRICE
AUTOMATIC
THE
MARSHAL
INSTALL
FURTHER
DOCUMENTATION
AN
IT
OF
FINAL
SUPPRESSION
DWELLING
AMENDMENT
AMENDMENT
OF
FIRE
SUBSECTION
A
BE
SHALL
COPY FIRE
ON
MAINTENANCE
NEW
AND
A
A WRiTTEN
LOCAL
LOCAL
STATE
UNDER
2.
AND
OF
BENEFITS
BUILDER
THE
(1) (2) THE
THE
WITH:
THE
AGREEING
THE
REQUESTED
(E)
(D)
SECTION
(C)
MARSHAL
BUILDER
BUYER
2016.
4
1,
OTHER DETAILS
BUYER,
FIRE INSTALLATION
THE
BEFORE
THE
1
7 9
3 5
6 8
2
4
13 15
14
11 12 10 - - AMENDMENT
AMENDENT
bracket; and
11; II II
W80019146382811
BY:
çro
in
in be
11111 liii!
line
On
On
On
line
offered
Delegate
strike
page
page
page
ff11111
12, IJU
6,
III strike
in strike
beginning
1,
2,
NO.
NO.2 3,
Adams
the IHII
Ifihl
in
in
in
“in line
1 Environment “(ifi)”;
line
ill IU
line
certain
III
Ill
AMENDMENTS
4,
with
8,
2,
1IIHH ll1I1
after
and strike
strike
the
buildings”.
(First
“repealing”
in
ñrst
and
“OR”;
line
the
Reading
Transportation
“and”
bracket; 19,
in
TO
strike
lines insert
in
HOUSE
File
line
and
9
the “,
Bill)
and
10
with
in bracket.
BILL
Committee)
down
12,
line
respect
in
19
through
26,
each
strike
to
instance,
certain —
“dwellings”
DEPT.
“TOWNHOUSES
A}ENDMEN’rs
PREPARED
OPLEGISLATWE
14
RYTHE
buildings”; 1A2&S2
JAN
strike
16
in
line
the
27 TEL 410-632-1194 FAX; 410-632-3131 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEB: www.co.worcesler.rnd.us
COMMISSIONERS HAROLDL HIGGINS. CPA OFFICE OF THE CHIEFADMINISTRATiVEOFFICER DIANAPURNLL, PRESIDENT COUNTh COMMISSIONERS MAUREENFL. HOWARTH JOSEPH M, MITRECIC, VICE PRESIDENT ANThONY W. BEETINO, JR. MADISONJ. UNTING, JR. nrc2±1r IUUUt’ JAMES C. CHURCI GOVERNMENT CENTER THEODOFE J. ELDER JOSHUA C. NORDSTROM ONE WEST MARKET STREET • ROOM 1103 SNOW HILL, MARYLAND 21863-1195
February 19, 2019
Norman C. Wang, RA
Director, Building Codes Administration V Division of Labor and Industry
V Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation 1100 North Eutaw Street, Room 606 Baltimore, Maryland 21201
RE: Single-Family Residential Fire Sprinklers in Worcester County
Dear Mr. Wang:
Please be advised that the Worcester County Commissioners recently discussed the requirement of the International Residential Building Code and the State of Maryland’s adoption thereof, which requires automatic fire spriniclersystems in all new one-and two-family dwellings in the State. While we understand that there is an argument that such systems may save lives and/or reduce fire damage, it is our collective feeling that the decision whether or not to install such systems should be left to the homeowner and not mandated by State law. In a rural county such as ours, where public water supplies are limited, this State mandate costs individuals building their home thousands of extra dollars in construction costs. Oftentimes this extra cost can keep a first-time home buyer from purchasing a new home. Additionally, Worcester County borders both the States of Virginia and Delaware and therefore our local home builders must compete with home builders in those states that do not have a fire sprinkler mandate. This situation adversely affects our local economy.
Part of our recent discussion centered around our understanding that currently at least one Maryland County does not require these fire sprinkler systems in their jurisdiction. Worcester County plans to join this other county by not requiring residential fire sprinkler systems in new single-family homes. Effective July 1, 2019, Worcester County will let the property owner building a new home decide for themselves if they want to install such a system. We intend to
Citizens and Government Working Together 28
29
C)
new
a
a
for
Sprinicler
for
Fire
permit
a
sprinkler
2019.
for
1,
fire
application
Residential
the
May
applicant
permit
Home
before
and
enforcing
so
building
do
builder
our
continue
Single-Family
on
please
to
Engineer
a
owner,
Regulation
box
Pumell
and
and
Maryland
action,
intend
President
Diana
Otto
Respectflully
we
Carozza
property
J.
request
Hartznan
4
check-off
dwellings.
Licensing
that
Secretary,
the
Beth
a
proposed
Attorney
by
Charles
Wayne
Administrator/County
note
waiver
Labor
Mary
our
Acting
of
having
Marshal
on
County
by
two-family
Please
Fire
Senator
Delegate Delegate
Building
system
completed
new
be
Howarth,
Rzepkowski,
Department
change
comment
home.
for
to
E.
2019
to
Honorable
Honorable Honorable
Wang Bradshaw,
McMahon,
sprinkler
this
19,
C.
form
Jeff
Bill
The The
Maureen
The
James
wish
2
you
cc:
If
single-family
effectuate Waiver
requirements
residential
February Page Nonnan heirs by number responsibilities managers, kin Property
kin of not Applicant built may Property and directors, laws understand The and Property
said 1)
their
that
State
hereby
further to
responsibilities
assigns.
Property
incur sprinklers
of at
and
______
WORCESTER sue
they
agents,
the
and
law.
Owner,
Owner,
Owner, next
officers,
Worcester
agree
directors, due
releases,
agrees
that State
are
TM!P)
Residential
Property
Owner,
of One
to
in managers,
for
the
residential
that
Builder
Builder kin
of
Builder this
Phone:
this
to
employees
Single the
West
property
not
Maryland. for
waives
officers,
indemnify
this
hereby
County,
failure
Builder
COUNTY
single
Owner, single
being REVIEW this
Market release 410-632-1200
and
and
AND
directors,
(address, fire
violation
and
releases,
owner,
family to
family Applicant,
Applicant, employees
equipped
Maryland
and
and Maryland
Builder
Furthermore,
sprinklers install Waiver
Applicant and
Family discharges
DEPARTMENT
is
Street,
AND
Applicant
assigns
intended
hold home.
builder Fire
officers,
home
account
of
waives
a
and
PERMITTING
with
residential
State
Room
their Fax:
their
their 21863
and Worcester
are
will harmless
being
Applicant
Worcester
and
to
a
Property
certifies number,
assigns,
employees and
410-632-3008 required Sprinkler agents, law.
personal
personal
residential
NOT Home be
1201
applicant
1
built
OF
discharges
as
fire
from
County,
broad Snow
comply
DEVELOPMENT
managers,
under their from
TM/P). Owner,
County, at
in
representatives,
representatives,
sprinkler ______
and
single
fire
any
for
Hill, personal
and
any
penalty
Maryland
Worcester
assigns,
with
sprinkler.
this loss,
Property
Builder
Maryland
inclusive
and
family
directors,
in
single
this
liability,
the
all
representatives,
of
from
law and
perjury liability
homes their
single
assigns,
Owner,
assigns,
Said County,
family
as
and
officers,
Applicant
and any
Date: is
damage
(address,
agents,
sprinkler
all
family
permitted
by
as
will
and
and
Builder
heirs home;
heirs
Maryland
of
follows: State
employees
their
all
NOT
managers,
or assigns,
home
covenant and
and
account
is
liability
2)
law
cost
and
by
required agents,
that
next
next install
and
being
the and
they
they
of
of
all
30
31
C
/3
(]3
2
(]J
Owner
and
and
and
Signature
Signature Phone Applicant- Address Address Phone
Signature Builder Phone The basements, In under
o Q o Minimum accordance STRUCTURE Tax USE Other
PFA Q Address Other lowest Zoning I.R.C. I.8.C. Planning Floodplain the Building Map OR
T Structure Non-conversion Elevation Description Review Review Worcester Approval habitable
L of garages, Approval Required Commission with Property Zone Certificate must
Permit site ______County etc. floor Setbacks: plan be shall Agreement
J level ______anchored approved Floodplain required
]
meet Parcel
DEVELOPMENT of Front Rear Elevation
WORCESTER Phone: any the required and
f Yard dwelling, by
Permit One Yard elevation Management ______vented
[ 410-632-1200 Tax West Snow ID including required # Market Hill,
COUNTY
0
______
I I
REVIEW on.______Law.
SectionLj
Application
Zoning Feet Ft. MSL Maryland Street. Left from: Fax:
DEPARTMENT
AND Yard
Permit
fl
C
o Room 21863 410-632-3008 Block
I Front Water
Critical PERMITTING SEC/SWM Env. Forestry County Health State Fire Liquor 1201 Programs Property Supply Plan Designation Area Marshal Roads
1 Lot No. License
OF Dept. Roads
Environmental — Ft. Line Engineer Right Engineer Zoning Application Submittal Date F.M. Permit HBGF Expiration ______(Office Road
II ______Yard
J Fee Issued: Fee Center District Fee:______Use
Q
f ______
QCollector Q Date:
j Date ______No. Sewage
unit______Only)
Programs
Demolition - of ______BMA ______Road
j ______Disposal______Ft. Right j of
Permit Way Arterial
32
33
D
C 0 rnomh (approved 12 12 of onto thai permit — S4iswy orderly single within this enter a revision. specifically respans&ilriy LJ to the completed all regulations approval app&ation not fora for S grant all riglit this Pemgt Cost may implement inspection) the zc,ning(ocaipancy with withe AsConstnzied Gas assumes a property make necesy D a subsiantiatity to application until olhcials cornpjy he/she F an and above change been foundation land on Department necezafyto wilt Construction the No. any that not of or County 7) JO or on The aithoäzed IEI has e is he/she reasonable permits fact Signature: Signattirer Stwy work (approved the grants Estimated be of expre notices; —I that no to app&ation he/she 3) start County described shalt ] he/she thange or that posting urigponiat foimd or l perform void. Owner/Applicant work hereto; that is original J j permit ] and State 6) will misstatement and an substantial lithe or- a permit on such follows: null reqit of as L._. pemirt he/she had orstiuctwe FederaL permitted expire. attadunents such the not PG2 that if whether become issuance, of Phone any 4) pequry shall has work of biäking
required LLULW&LP1S of on Address Address
shalt DRAFT — the all Ii bte any rriegxesentation hereto; permit permit applicant, applicant, of and revocation 1._I penalty any ui’emit this the permits the such Department any occupy in by by inforrnation i inspecting to under months the phcable and/or 5)that of all F Experi by 24 IMI JEMail[ obtain are issuance, request denial oi descsthed provided and certifies unbwful ptrpose wilhm issued for including License which project. be date application work the written and the been herdiy request type OWTierI the shall for the this - of it If correct, grounds County has upon in infonhation inspection) L..J Name from aP that arid f L______J REQUIRW cflO5Oron 8 applicant bndscapel&M property neeiNameandLicerse determine, that ue r1.LSO fl Other is E the 2) to months Exp.atiorr Worterter descthed constitute The cemti&ate and extension completion framing Arthi*ect Owner lkerise1 Phone Phone Rebtionshto Applicant ______
DivisioN OF LABORAND INDUSTRY Matthew Helminiak, Commissioner 1100 North Eutaw Street, Room 600 Baltimore, MD 21201 C,DEPARTMENTOFLABOR,LICENSINGANDREGULATION______
March25, 2019
Ms. Diana Purnell President Office of the County Commissioners RECEIVED Worcester County MAZ1fl19 One West Market Street, Room 1103 County Admin Snow Hill, Maryland 21863-1195 Worcester
Dear President Purnell:
Your recent letter of February 19, 2019 to Norman Wang of the Building Codes Administration has been forwarded to me for response. As I understand it, Worcester County is proposing to amend its building permit application to provide for a “check-off” box on your building permit application “for a residential sprinkler system waiver request and a Single-Family Home Residential Fire Sprinkler Waiver form to be completed by the property owner, builder and applicant for a permit for a new single family dwelling.”
As you may be aware, Subtitle 5. Maryland Building Performance Standards was created by the General Assembly under the Public Safety Article. Within that subtitle are nine separate sections governing (1) the adoption and enforcement of statewide building codes, (2) the duties and powers of the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation1 (DLLR), and (3) the duties and powers of local jurisdictions.
DTTP c re.niiirpd tn ai-lnnt hii rpcrn1itnn th Mcwu1rid PnUdir’a Prfnrtr” — - j-—-- --—--- Standards, the International Building Code (IBC), including the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), subject to modification by DLLR, see Public Safety Article,
§12-503, Annotated Code of Maryland. These regulations are referred to as the “Standards”.
Each local jurisdiction is required to implement and enforce the most current version of the Standards and any local amendments. The specific requirements related to local jurisdiction adoption, amendment, implementation, and enforcement of the Standards are contained,
1 EffectiveJuly 1,2018, administrationof the Standardswas transferredfromthe Departmentof Housing andCommunityDevelopment(DHCD)to DLLR.
PHONE: 410-767-4037• FAx 410-767-2986• INTERNET:www.dlIr.maryland.gov
LARRYHOGAN, GOVERNOR . BOYDK. RUTHERFORD, LT. GOVERNOR 34 independent of the sections related to DLLR, in § 12-504 and 12-505 of the Public Safety (?J Article. Specifically §12-504 addresses automatic fire sprinkler systems.
While §12-502(c) of the Public Safety article clarifies the authority of Subtitle 5 and, among other provisions, states “This subtitle does not allow or encourage the State to initiate or assume an independent role in the administration and enforcement of the Standards for a building or structure that is not owned or operated by the State,”, the requirement that local jurisdictions provide DLLR a copy of local amendments to the Standards exists in §12-504 and §12-506. DLLR is required under §12-506 to maintain a central automated database of, among other things, the Standards and any local amendments. DLLR may also include any information provided by a local jurisdiction on the implementation and interpretation of the Standards and interim amendments. As such, Worcester County is required to notify and provide a copy to DLLR of any local amendments to the Standards within 15 days after the effective date of the amendment. This information will be maintained in the database and may include additional information that DLLR has received, including information regarding the proposal regarding the waiver form as described in your letter.
Please note, as of March 15, 2019 the amendments to update the adopted Standards became final, see Md Register volume 46, issue 6, pages 345-346. Notification to all counties will go out under separate cover.
Sincerely, .__ Matthew Helminiak Commissioner of Labor and Industry
cc: James E. Rzepkowski, Acting Secretary
C
35 BRIAN E. FRosH SAND BENSONBRANTLEY ATTORNEY GENERAL COUNSEL TO THE GENERAl. ASSEAOSIY
ELIZABETH F. HARRIS KATHRYN M, ROWE CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DREUTYCOUNSEL
CAROLYN A. QUATTROCKJ JEREMY M. McCoy r)EPLrCY ATTORNEY GENERAL ASSIDNF4TATTORNEY GENERAL
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND DAV1DW.STAMI’ER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF COUNSEL TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
February 19, 2019
The Honorable Dana Stein Maryland House of Delegates 251 House Office Building Annapolis, Maryland 21401
Dear Delegate Stein:
You have inquired about the authority of a county to opt out of Maryland Building Performance Standards (“Standards”) that include International Building Code (“IBC”) standards requiring newly constructed residential buildings in the State to be equipped with sprinkler systems. Except under limited circumstances, a localjurisdiction may not adopt local amendments to the Standards that weaken the automatic fire sprinider systems provisions of the Standards for townhouses and one- or two-family dwellings in the local jurisdiction. Subject to other specific limitations, a county may adopt a local amendment to the Standards relating to the use of sprinklers in other types of residential buildings, including a less restrictive standard, which would apply only in that county. As to other residential dwelling buildings however, there are additional fire prevention sprinkler system requirements under State law for which certain exceptions may be granted by the State Fire Marshall or a local authority with jurisdiction over fire or building codes.
Under § 12-503 of the Public Safety Article (“PS”), the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (“DLLR”) is required to adopt by regulation, as the statewide Standards, the IBC, subject to modification by DLLR.1 Except for certain agricultural buildings, the Standards apply to all buildings and structures within the State for which a building permit application is received by a local jurisdiction. COMAR 05.02.07.06A.2
COMAR 05.02.07.05 authorizes a local jurisdiction (a county or municipal corporation) to modify the provisions of the Standards by local amendment “to address conditions peculiar to the
Pursuant to Chapter 673 of the 2018 Laws of Maryland, effective July 1, 2018, administration of the Standards was transferred from the Department of I-lousing and Community Development (“DHCD”) to DLLR. 2 Section 5 of Ch. 673 of the 2018 Laws of Maryland maintained existing regulations relating to the Standards adopted by DHCD in COMAR 05.02.07, and required that those regulations continue in effect under administration by DLLR until replaced. DLLR has issued a Notice of Proposed Action to recodify existing COMAR 05.02.07 to be newly proposed COMAR 09.12.31. Md, Register, Vol.46, Issue 1(1/4/19), p. 16.
104 LEGISLATIVE SERVICES BUILDING 90 STATE CIRCLE ANNAPOUS, MARYLAND 21405-1995 410-946-5600 301-970-5600. FAX 450-946-5601 TTY 450-946-5401. 101-970-5401
36 The Honorable Dana Stein February 19, 2019 Page 2
local jurisdiction’s cornmunity[.]” A local jurisdiction may adopt a local amendment to the Standards that applies to the local jurisdiction if the local amendment does not: (1) prohibit the minimum implementation and enforcement activities set forth in PS § 12-505; (2) weaken energy conservation and efficiency provisions contained in the Standards (including weakening the requirements of Chapter 13 of the IBC, as provided in COMAR 05.02.07.05); (3) except under certain circumstances, weaken the automatic fire sprinkler systems provisions for townhouses and one- and two-family dwellings contained in the Standards; or (4) weaken wind design and wind-
borne debris provisions contained in the Standards. PS § 12-504(a). The minimum implementation and enforcement activities under PS § 12-505 that a local jurisdiction remains required to carry out include the: (1) review and acceptance of appropriate plans; (2) issuance of building permits; (3) inspection of the work authorized by the building permits; and (4) issuance of appropriate use and occupancy certificates. PS § 12-505(a)(2). Local jurisdictions are prohibited from amending statewide regulations that apply to “industrialized buildings” under PS § 12-301 etseq. See COMAR 05.02.01.01 etseq. and COMAR 05.02.04.01 etseq.
Each local jurisdiction is required to implement and enforce the most current version of the Standards and any local amendments to the Standards. Any modification of the Standards adopted by the State after December 31, 2009, is required to be implemented and enforced by a local jurisdiction within 12 months after being adopted by the State. PS § 12-505(a)(1). A local jurisdiction that adopts a local amendment to the Standards is required to ensure that the local amendment is adopted in accordance with applicable local law, and must provide a copy of the local amendment to DLLR at least 15 days before the effective date of the amendment or within 5 days after the adoption of an emergency local amendment. PS § 12-504(b), (d), and (e). If a local amendment conflicts with the Standards, the local amendment prevails in the local jurisdiction. PS § 12-505(c).
With specific regard to sprinider system requirements under the Standards, a local government is authorized to adopt local amendments to the Standards addressing sprinkler systems if the local amendments do not, except as provided below, “weaken the automatic fire sprinkler systems provisions for townhouses and one- and two-family dwellings contained in the Standards.” PS § 12-504(a)(1)(iii). A local government may deviate from the Standards’sprinkler requirements for those structures described above through local standards that: (1) govern the “issuance of a building permit for a property not connected to an electrical utility;” or (2) until January 1,2016, govern the “issuance of a building permit for a new one- or two-family dwelling constructed on:” (a) a “lot subject to a valid unexpired public works utility agreement that was executed before March 1,2011;” or (b) “a lot served by an existing water service line from a water main to the property line” that: (i) “is less than a nominal 1-inch size;” (ii) “is approved and owned by the public or private water system that owns the mains;” (iii) “was installed before March 1, 2011;” and (iv) “is fully operational from the public or private main to a curb stop or meter pit located at the property line.” PS § 12-504(a)(3). a
37
jurisdiction
have
with
under
Subject
accordance
after
circumstances.
building
The
apply,
which
dwelling
installed
a
constructed
for
newly
approved
system
that
standards.
However,
the
to
the
amendments
Page
February
The
local
other
which
physical
a
State
Standards
use
July
may
PS
Honorable
system
however,
construction
3
constructed
Similarly,
jurisdiction
to
Under
that
Accordingly,
of
§
codes
on
in:
specific
Fire
prevent
by
allowable
9-204
1,
the
please
19,
to with
sprinklers
town
meets
which
(1)
or
to
the
1974
simply
to
2019
PS
for
initial
Marshall
PS
mental
“detect
may
accepted
to
and
Dana
“each
the
under
house
State
limitations,
note
townhouses
§
the
a
dormitory,
§
a
in
begins
construction
is
9-204,
9-205.
local
dwelling
Standards
exceptions,
§
opt
building
grant
which in
except
requirements
required
Stein
9-403.
there
PS
Fire
limitations
dormitory,
and
for
other
or
out
engineering
jurisdiction
on
§
in
which
a
extinguish
Marshall
an
9-403,
are
building
under
of
hotel,
a
a
local
or
unit
See
types and
permit
that
local
county
exception
the
to
additional
begins
after
there
the
also
one-
that
who
hotel,
have
limited
authority
subject
weaken
lodging
of
fire
of
jurisdiction
initial
permits
or
July
practices
is
the from
a
does
may
PS
is
residential
and
are
on
prevention
fire
local
issued
a
not
lodging
National
§
to fire
to
1,
circumstances,
or
“complete
two-family
unable
building
or
adopt
or
opting
not
automatically 9-503
with
certain
serviced
1992.”
are
after
the
rooming
authority,
opt
prevention
as
on
appear
in
not
or
a
jurisdiction
buildings,
sprinkler
approved
(certain
out
to
which
or
July Fire
out
sprinkler
local
permit
exceptions,
PS rooming
issued,
evacuate
after
by
of
automatic
dwellings
house,
of
to
Protection
1,
is
§
the
a
amendment
building
sprinkler
those
a
while
be 9-204(b).
dwellings
required
public
1990;”
is
July
local
by
system
including
requirements
a
automatic
issued
any
or
house,
over
sprinkler
without
the
a
sounding
specific
multifamily
1,
in
jurisdiction
sprinkler
high-rise
water
and
express
Association
permits
authority
the
requirements
the
1
to
on
requirement
990;”
with
These
to
or
a
(2)
be
assistance
local
or
enforcement
sprinkler
system
system. the
less
multifamily
State-required
50
after
an
installed
for
“each
authority are
and
building
system
requirements
Standards
jurisdiction.
residential
or
alarm”).
restrictive
with
may
certain
issued,
standards
July
more
(2)
is
town
under
requirements
PS
is
under
required
jurisdiction.”
not
in:
“each
installed
1,
constructed
required
for
of
§
occupants
residential
dwellings
a
adopt
1992.”
relating
9-204(c).
house
(1)
State
dwelling
sprinkler
fire standard.
sprinider
a
that
certain
do Subject
newly
local
“each
to
and
local
not
law
to
are
on
in
be
In
to
of 38 39
0 2
contact
to
free
feel
General
please —;2
/
McCoy
Attorney
7
M.
information,
/ /
Sincerely,
Jeremy
Assistant
additional
any
need
or
questions
Stein
any
Dana
have
2019
19,
you
If
4
Honorable
The
February Page
me. ______STATE OF MARYLAND MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SFE FIRE PREVENTION COMMISSION Larry Hogan 18345 Colonel Henry K. Douglas Drive Colonel William M. Pal lozzi Governor Suite 240 Secretaiy Hagerstown MD 21740 Boyd K. Rutherford 301-766-3899 C. Daniel Davis, Jr. Lt. Governor Fax: 301-766-3889 chairman http://sfpc.mdsp.org rnsp.scmaryland.gov April 25, 2019 RECEIVED
The Honorable Brian E. Frosh APR29 U19 Attorney General of Maryland 200 Saint Paul Street WorcesterCountyAdmin Baltimore MD 21202
RE: Failure of Allegany County and Worcester County to Enforce and Uphold the Lawfully Adopted Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Protection in Newly Constructed One- and Two-Fami’y Homes
Dear Attorney General Frosh:
On March 15, 2019, the State of Maryland through the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation adopted the 2018 edition of the Intern ational Residential Code with an effective date of March 25, 2019. This Code requires that every newly constructed one- and two-family home be provided with automatic fire sprinkler protection. This requirement affords improved fire protection not only to the home’s occupants but also to fire service personnel. In short, it saves lives and prevents the needless destruction of property caused by fires in one- and two-family homes.
The enclosed “January through December 2017 Fire Deaths in Maryland Report” compiled by the Office of the Maryland State Fire Marshal (the most current annual statistics available) reflects that residential fires accounted for 84% of all fire deaths in Maryland and of those, 73% occurred in one- .and two-family dwellings (see page 9).
The Maryland State Fire Prevention Commission has learned that Allegany County government officials are not requiring the installation of automatic sprinkler protection in new one- and two-family homes. Allegany County is currently enforcing the 2006 edition of the International Residential Code which does not contain this fire sprinkler requirement. The Commission has also recently learned that beginning on July 1, 2019, the Office of the County Commissioners of Worcester County will permit single family homeowners to choose to opt out of the automatic fire sprinkler system required by the Code.
The Maryland State Fire Marshal, while fully supportive of the residential automatic fire sprinkler requirement, has assured this Commission that his office lacks the authority to enforce this particular fire sprinkler requirement because it is not a requirement of the State Fire Prevention Code. Furthermore, § 6-305(a)(1) of the Public Safety Article prohibits the State Fire Marshal from enforcing laws and regulations in “buildings that are used solely as dwelling houses for no more than two families.”
40 The
Attorney General Brian Frosh April 25, 2019 Page 2
The Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation has also taken the position that it lacks the authority to enforce this particular fire sprinkler requirement. It should be noted, however, that § 12-504 (a)(iii) of the Public Safety Article prohibits local amendments that “weaken the automatic fire sprinkler systems provisions for townhouses and one- and two-family dwellings,” with very limited exceptions. Section 12-505, meanwhile, requires local jurisdictions to enforce the most current version of the Maryland Building Performance Standards no later than twelve months after the Standards are adopted by the State.
During its regularly scheduled meeting on April 18, 2019, the Fire Prevention Commission thoroughly discussed the positions of both Allegany and Worcester Counties and found them to be contrary to adequate protection from unwanted fire. The Commission also unanimously voted both to draw your attention to the seriousness of Allegany and Worcester Counties’ non-compliance and to ask you, in your capacity as the State’s senior law enforcement officer, to initiate prompt corrective action to enforce the counties’ compliance with the Code.
The Commission firmly believes that a failure to secure that compliance will result in additional jurisdictions taking similar non-compliant positions, and that the end result will be increased loss of life and property throughout the State.
Commission looks forward to a positive reply from your office.
Sincerely, e
C. Daniel Davis, Jr. Chairman State Fire Prevention Commission
cc: Brian Geraci, Maryland State Fire Marshal Matthew Helminiak, Commissioner of Labor and Industry Diana Purnell, President Worcester County Commissioners ./ Jacob Shade, President Allegany County Commissioners Richard Blair, President Maryland State Firemen’s Association
Enclosure
41 April Joyce
Sudlersville, 200
You Dear Violation:
You Resident
Respectfully,
Management,
Terrapin
are
painted
12,
Ms.
Homey
being
2019
shall
Homey,
(House
MD.21668
the
Grove
issued
not
The
back
alter,
Rules
Apt.
Housing
the
door
303
repair
and following
of
Authority
Regulations
the
or
205
otherwise
building.
lease
Phone:
East
Queen
Housing
of
LEASE
violations:
Water Queen Attachment
(410)758-8634
change
Centreville,
Executive
Jeremy
Street,
www.pacha.org
Anne’s
Anne’s
VIOLATION
the
Authority
2
Suite
R.
MD
#10
Director premises
County
Fax:
White
21617
100,
on
County
(410)758-8635
your
P.O.
or
of
equipment
lease)
Box
280
therein.
Tonya JamesW. James Board
JoAnne
Richard
D. Members
L.
N.
D.
Brown Hynson
Holley
Brice
Cira
3
42 VVV
-1I.!;E FIRST.CLASS The Housing Authoñty of Queen Anro’s County . Qlfl7 P1) I 9 — P 0 Box 280 )UUU. Centrevflle, Md. 21617
LIE— 7 041 Li 0250203
4/Oct)
;w_61 V 44 May 13, 2019
Housing Authority of Queen Annes’ County
206 East Water Street, P 0 Box280
Centreville, MD21617
Attn: Management
Jeremy White, Executive Director
We, the undersigned, wish to express our concern about the letter sent to Joyce Homey, Apt1t 303 at Terrapin Grove. It is dated April 12, 2019, but was not mailed until May 7th causing the letter to arrive on May 9th
This is referencing the painting of the rear entrance door to the apartment building at Terrapin Grove. Numerous requests to have maintenance to this door was reported, either in writing or verbally, by different tenants, over a two to three year period. These requests obviously fell on deaf ears, because nothing was done. The door was filthy and showed signs of mold — disgraceful — certainly not what we would expect to be representative of the condition of the entrance to our home where we live.
With spring upon us and Easter only a few days away, we thought it quite appropriate that this action be taken — scrub, wash down, and paint. We cite Tenant Participation Plan, B. Required Activities of Participation, Project Beautification, 2a and b — Tenants will participate in flower planting and common areas cleanup maintenance program in areas designated by the HA.
General area cleanup will be scheduled seasonally and all tenants will be encouraged to participate. Neither of these two have been performed by the HA, so the tenants decided that this door should be maintained by scrubbing, washing down and painting to benefit all and present a much nicer appearance for our building.
Instead of a letter of lease violation, we think it should have been one of thanks. We request that another letter be sent to Ms. Homey rescinding the Lease Violation stating that this incident will be removed from her file.
Respectfully,
45 Cc:
James L.Hynson
James W. Holley
Tanya D. Brown
JoAnne N. Brice
Richard D. Cira
Philip L.Dumenhl, District 3
Christopher M. Corchiarino, District, 4
Todd R. Mohn, PE, County Adminstrator
46 Apt#
))
3
4ji
5
OL
:Iq 30/
3O(o
//
//
L
Name
/)/
jY)cG
//7•
-L
c
:
c_ -
1
;,_7(J
Pc44/z
Q
/
C
?/
j
47 ‘6<’
James Jack TO: Christopher Philip Stephen County
CC:
DATE: ç.L) FROM: SUBJECT:
is Planning:
1’he
current
N.
Development
following
J.
L.
Wilson,
Wilson,
Moran,
Dumenil,
Commissioners:
o o o o
o o
o
M.
as
Administrative Minor
Major Concept Minor
Major of Corchiarino, STAC
Jr.,
At
District
infonnation
April
District
Large Todd County Planning Economic E. May28, Monthly District
•
NO • *
•
•
•
Anne
ueen
Count-’i
SP-19-04-0023
Review/Site
Michael
Subdivision Subdivision
meetings Site
Site
2
SUB-19-01-0087 SUB-19-01-0086
SP-18-03-0010 SP-l One
MAJOR
NO 30,
plan
3
Mohn,
I
District
plan plan
Commissioners
2019
I’IAJOR meeting 8-08-0006
2019
Department
Commission
is
reviews
‘s
Development —‘
Wisnosky,
SP-19-00 Subdivision
compiled
4 review
review
SUBDIVISION
County
Plans/Subdivision
plat plat
held -
SUBDIVISION
Morris - -
reviews reviews
Ten
Devore
Devore
Fox
17-C,
Administrator
on
by
Report
AICP,
plat
April
the
Eyck
Point Commission
Solar
Grasonville
staff
Fann
Farm
APPLICATIONS
reviews —
Brewery,
10,
Director
Properties-4,085 -
April
MEMORANDUM
88.89
of
Plats/Growth
2019
LLC
LLC
APPLICATIONS
the
2019
acre
Station
Department - -
Commercial
Recorded Recorded
DEPARTM
Solar -
RECEIVED
7-Eleven
sq.
Allocations/Adequate
Array
ft.
of
Brewery
RECEIVED
Building
Planning
Information
ENT
with
and
OF
Telephone
Telephone
Zoning. 2uid
PLANNING
Public
floor
Fax
Item
Fax
The
apartments
Planning:
Planning:
Facilities:
Permits: Permits:
110
Centreville,
information
Vincit
(410)
(410)
(410)
(410)
&
St.,
ZONING
MD
provided
758-1255 Suite 758-2905 758-4088 758-3972
21617
104
48 Zoning:
•
Building
Highlights
o
o
Planning
Use
$35,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $15,000,000 $25,000,000
$10,000,000
Permit
$5,000,000
Permits Permit
Construction Submitted
• •
of
Permits:
CommerciaL
Minor Wye
Major Queenstown service
Apr-19
Information Applications
Commission
Issued
Commercial
Residential
river
Site
Site
bays.
Value
Apr-19
Marina,
Plan
Plan
Permits
Assisted
(Source:
meeting,
Apr-18 - -
5P18-09-0012
SP-19-0l-0018
$3,977,705
Piney
April
2019
Issued
Living, 132
86
81
5
Building
Apr-18
Creek April
Energov
in
2019
to
11,
Road, April:
Construct
$4,460,290
YTD
Permit
&
2019 April
2018
201
139 115
24
Sungard):
Chester
2019
Tracking
a
‘(TO 2018
73 -
2019
bedroom,
Construct
YTO
$34,339,030
Year
2019
419
404 288
116
2018
to 49,998
a
‘(TO two
Date
O
O 0
story
Commercial Residential Permit Permits
sq.
ft.
201
building
assisted
Applications
$28,948,552
Issued
8
Year
Cost
617 541 398
143
with
of
living
to
Construction
Date
office
Submitted
facility.
and
5
49 ,Zonin
•
• • • • •
•
•
Inspection
Board Temporary Meeting License Meeting Talisman Disable K! Ruthsburg
benefit Chesapeake League Hearing Approved Review Malik, 21619.
EMW:mes
Estates
o o
o o o o o
Boards:
of
for New
Commercial of
Total Nuisance Citations Zoning (YTD: Liquor of
American
application
Commission
held Date:
Date
Therapeutic
Doe Appeals
Woman
the Community Community
and
licenses
• • •
•
• •
Bay
Commercial:
for
fines
benefit —
Bar
Law
NO 182/52)
restaurant 450
Inspections 515 Office Training 310 room. office 302 800 137 equipment/storage St
Enforcement
April
transfer
Environmental
Issued:
Complaints/Code
Veterans Claire
Voters issued:
LLC,
HEARII’JGS
Amberly sq. Log
issued Bateau for Abruzzi
Love
Compliance
Renovations:
of
and (Liquor
Riding,
1647
trailer
2,
Center Assoc. ft.
advertising
Canoe
Bayside
facility
trading Place,
of
2019
2
Point
for
QAC reception
$1000.00
to:
Dr, YTD
Conducted:
sq.
a (DAV)
Dr,
with
Farm
members
Class
Activity Inc. — —
Board):
ft.
Stevensville,
Circle,
Rd,
Stevensville, —
Date Date to Center Chester,
OR
as
Inspections:
Issued:
Oil,
Date
steps - room.
the include
Lane,
Red —
D” Violation
Stevensville,
(YTD area,
Date MEETII’JGS
Date
LLC,
of
of
transfer
Stevensville,
beer, of
of for
to -
Eyes
470
event
event
9
Date
Maryland
Queenstown,
relocate
golf
event of
grade
of Issued:
studio,
April:
trading
wine County
event
St.
(l45of
63
event
Dock
Inspections
— course. — of
of -
April April and
Clair
(YTD:
Claude
event
a
May IN
front
&
backroom,
$4500.00; —
as —
Class
Bar General
KRM
which
May accessible Commissioners
liquor
APRIL,
April
Piney
Suites,
25
12,
7 Washington -
door
267) 2.0,
July
&
“A”
Conducted:
4
May
BCR
within 6 license
Dominic
428 Land
Creek
and
YTD
LLC,
bathroom
13 2019
beer
4,
ramp.
LLC.
Kent
add
May
Co,
Critical
Paid:
Xtra from
&
construct
Hunters
Digiovine.
of
cable
wine
708
Narrows Tennant Use 102
17
Queen
open
Mart,
Robert
$4000.00)
sq. (43
Area)
permit
to license
Oak
office
interior
ft.
front
2120 of
Anne’s
fit-out
Way
Wilson
Convert
(YTD:
which
C,
for
from
center
area,
Piney
Hunters
North,
partition
“We
for
County.
in
to
Sheikh
1149/426
existing
private
“Tastebuds
of
Creek
Critical
Robert
Care
Grasonville,
Oak roof,
walls
Install
Asadullah
Clinic”,
office
Rd.,
7’ Pub
W.
Area) 168
)
x
to
Kitchen”
Gordon,
Chester,
40
24’
a
sq.
create
and
11’8”x
1
MD
seat
porch
ft.
employee,
to
storage
Tanveer -
for
MD
60’
to
the
50