Age and Petrochemistry of Mafic Sills in Rocks of the Northwestern Margin of the Meguma Terrane, Bear River - Yarmouth Area of Southwestern Nova Scotia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Age and Petrochemistry of Mafic Sills in Rocks of the Northwestern Margin of the Meguma Terrane, Bear River - Yarmouth Area of Southwestern Nova Scotia Report of Activities 2003 97 Age and Petrochemistry of Mafic Sills in Rocks of the Northwestern Margin of the Meguma Terrane, Bear River - Yarmouth Area of Southwestern Nova Scotia C. E. White and S. M. Barr1 Introduction overlying Halifax Formation), the Silurian White Rock Formation and the Early Devonian Torbrook Formation (Figs. 1, 2, 3). The Cambrian to Early Devonian Goldenville, Halifax, White Rock and Torbrook formations, The Goldenville Formation consists of grey exposed along the northwestern margin of the medium- to thick-bedded metasandstone, locally Meguma Terrane in southwestern Nova Scotia, are interlayered with green, cleaved metasiltstone and characterized by the presence of abundant mafic rare black slate (Horne et al., 2000; White et al., sills (Loring, 1954; Taylor, 1969; Smitheringale, 2001). A distinctive feature of the Goldenville 1973; Doyle, 1979; Trapasso, 1979; White et al., Formation near High Head (Figs. 1, 3) is a <1 km 1999). Sills are particularly abundant in the thick interval of mainly grey-green (High Head Halifax, White Rock and Torbrook formations in member) metasiltstone that contains abundant trace the Wolfville-Kentville, Nictaux-Torbrook and fossils. The Early Cambrian deep-water ichnofossil Bear River areas (Fig. 1), and are so abundant in Oldhamia was observed within this unit, which places that they could be termed swarms. Recent suggests that the lower part of the Goldenville fieldwork related to the Southwest Nova Scotia Formation (below this interval) may extend into the Mapping Project in the Bear River to Yarmouth Neoproterozoic. area has documented the presence of additional mafic sills not shown on previous maps, and some The Halifax Formation in the map area has of these sills are located well down in the been subdivided into three stratigraphic units stratigraphy of the Goldenville Formation. named, from oldest to youngest, the Bloomfield, Acacia Brook/Cunard and Bear River/Sissiboo The purpose of this paper is to provide River members (White et al., 1999, 2001; Horne et information about the field relations, age, and al., 2000). The Bloomfield member consists of petrochemistry of sills in the area between Bear distinctly banded maroon and green, thinly bedded River and Yarmouth. The data are used to metasiltstone and slate. Conformably overlying the characterize and compare these sills, and to Bloomfield member is black to rust-brown slate interpret their chemical affinity and tectonic setting with minor metasandstone layers of the Acacia through an emplacement history that appears to Brook/Cunard member. The Bear River/Sissiboo have extended from Early Cambrian to Middle River member is interpreted to conformably overlie Devonian. the Acacia Brook/Cunard member and consists of silty slate with minor metasandstone and slate. Geological Setting Early Tremadoc acritarch microfossils were reported by Doyle (1979) from the Halifax Stratigraphic units in the map area include the Formation exposed along Bear River near the Cambrian to Ordovician Meguma Group, contact with the White Rock Formation. Specimens (consisting of the Goldenville Formation and of the graptolite Rhabdinopora flabelliforme, an 1Department of Geology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6 White, C. E. and Barr, S. M. 2004: in Mineral Resources Branch, Report of Activities 2003; Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, Report 2004-1, p. 97-117 98 Mineral Resources Branch Figure 1. Simplified geology map of the Bear River – Yarmouth area of southwestern Nova Scotia showing locations of the Bear River and Mavillette - High Head areas (in boxes). Inset map shows the location of the Wolfville-Kentville (W) and Nictaux-Torbrook (N) areas. Report 99of Activities 2003 Figure 2. Simplified geology map of the Bear River area showing approximate locations and orientations of type I and type II sills. Locations of the geochemical samples A to T and 1 to 32 (Table 1) are shown. 100 Mineral Resources Branch Figure 3. Simplified geology map of the Mavillette - High Head area showing approximate locations and orientations of Mavillette sill samples (B01-RJH numbers) and type I (32) and type II sills. index species marking the Cambrian-Ordovician have yielded Tremadoc acritarchs (W. A. M. boundary (Cooper et al., 2001), were reported from Jenkins, personal communication, 1977, in Schenk, the uppermost beds exposed in the Bear River 1995a). member (White et al., 1999). In addition, units that are interpreted to represent the uppermost Halifax Unconformably overlying the Halifax Formation elsewhere in the Meguma Group Formation in the Bear River and Weymouth areas (Rockville Notch and Moshers Island formations) are slate, metasiltstone and metasandstone of the Report of Activities 2003 101 White Rock Formation (White et al., 1999; Horne and Barr, 1983; MacDonald et al., 1992; Ham, et al., 2000). Fossils from the upper part of this 1994; White et al., 1999; Horne et al., 2001). formation in the Bear River area were assigned to the Late Silurian by Blaise et al. (1991) and Bouyx Mafic Sills et al. (1997). In contrast, the White Rock Formation in the Yarmouth area is composed mainly of metavolcanic rocks (Taylor, 1967; Introduction Hwang, 1985; MacDonald, 2000; White et al., 2001; MacDonald et al., 2002). Contacts with the Two prominent sets of mafic sills are present in the underlying Halifax Formation are shear zones map area (Fig. 1). Type I sills are restricted to the (Culshaw, 1994; Culshaw and Liesa, 1997; White Meguma Group and are inferred to be et al., 2001; Moynihan, 2003) that have yielded ca. penecontemporaneous with their host rocks and, 320 Ma muscovite ages, indicating a lower therefore, latest Neoproterozoic to Early Pennsylvanian age for development (Culshaw and Ordovician in age. Type II sills intrude the Reynolds, 1997; Moynihan, 2003). A felsic tuff Meguma Group as well as the White Rock and from the upper part of the White Rock Formation Torbrook formations, but predate the South in the Yarmouth area yielded a U-Pb zircon age of Mountain Batholith, Ellison Lake Pluton and ca. 438 Ma (MacDonald et al., 2002), whereas Clayton Hill Pluton; hence, they are early to middle felsic crystal tuff at the base of the section in the Devonian in age. A third set of mafic sills was Torbrook area yielded a similar U-Pb (zircon) age recognized, which are texturally and of 442 ± 4 Ma (Keppie and Krogh, 2000). Recently mineralogically similar to Mesozoic basalt of the discovered fossils from near the base of the North Mountain Formation. These probable formation in the Yarmouth area suggest that the Mesozoic sills are not common and will not be formation in that area may extend down into the discussed further here. Based on limited data, type Ordovician, but is dominantly Silurian (A. Boucot, I and II sills were interpreted by Barr et al. (1983) written communication, 2004). to be tholeiitic transitional to alkalic, with the older sills more alkalic in character, and speculated to Gradationally overlying the White Rock have been emplaced in a continental, within-plate Formation in the Bear River, Torbrook and environment. Weymouth areas are metasiltstone, slate, metasandstone and marble of the Early Devonian Type I Sills Torbrook Formation (Smitheringale, 1973; White Type I sills are typically light grey and fine-grained et al., 1999; Horne et al., 2000; Bouyx et al., with an average thickness of 2 m, rarely exceeding 1997). Numerous mafic sills and rare dykes intrude 3 m (Fig. 4). They are concordant with bedding but the Meguma Group and White Rock and Torbrook are not laterally extensive, typically pinching out formations but not the South Mountain Batholith. along strike. Dykes similar to type I sills are rare; These sills are described in more detail below. however, locally some sills bifurcate and cut across bedding or cut up-section to another bedding The Meguma Group, White Rock Formation surface. Typically the sills display fine-grained to and Torbrook Formation (and mafic sills) were glassy (now altered) chill margins at the top and deformed during the Devonian Acadian Orogeny. bottom of the sill. They are also commonly Deformation resulted in regional-scale vesicular and locally show multiple intrusions one northeastward-trending folds with an axial planar into another (e.g. Doyle 1979, plate 3-3, p. 54). cleavage and regional greenschist facies One sill in the Bloomfield member had a metamorphism (Taylor, 1969; Smitheringale, 1973; pronounced amygdaloidal margin towards the White et al., 1999; Horne et al., 2000). All of these inferred top of the sill and in the High Head units were intruded by late syntectonic, medium- to member along the coast (Fig. 3) a thin sill displays coarse-grained monzogranite and granodiorite of peperite-like structures along its lower contact with the Late Devonian South Mountain Batholith and the country rocks (Fig. 5a). Some sills in the Bear the Ellison Lake and Clayton Hill plutons (Allen River member along the Bear River Estuary display 102 Mineral Resources Branch irregular contacts or interfinger with the host a result of deuteric and autometasomatic processes sedimentary rocks (Doyle, 1979; Barr et al., 1983), such as those described by Poage et al. (2000) or and laminations in the slate and sill contacts are in later regional/retrograde metamorphism. places highly contorted (Fig. 5b). These relationships suggest that sill emplacement was Type I sills, together with the Meguma Group, penecontemporaneous with deposition of the have been deformed into F1 folds (Fig. 5c). The Meguma Group. sills are characterized by upright, subhorizontal to shallowly northeast-plunging, northeast-trending Type I sills are highly altered with only relict folds with a steep axial planar cleavage (Fig. 7a). igneous textures preserved (e.g. flow alignment These structures mimic those in the folded country defined by pesudomorphed euhedral plagioclase, rocks (Fig. 7b) and indicate that the sills were porphyritic and glomeroporphyritic textures) and originally emplaced horizontally along bedding no igneous minerals.
Recommended publications
  • Barriers to Fish Passage in Nova Scotia the Evolution of Water Control Barriers in Nova Scotia’S Watershed
    Dalhousie University- Environmental Science Barriers to Fish Passage in Nova Scotia The Evolution of Water Control Barriers in Nova Scotia’s Watershed By: Gillian Fielding Supervisor: Shannon Sterling Submitted for ENVS 4901- Environmental Science Honours Abstract Loss of connectivity throughout river systems is one of the most serious effects dams impose on migrating fish species. I examine the extent and dates of aquatic habitat loss due to dam construction in two key salmon regions in Nova Scotia: Inner Bay of Fundy (IBoF) and the Southern Uplands (SU). This work is possible due to the recent progress in the water control structure inventory for the province of Nova Scotia (NSWCD) by Nova Scotia Environment. Findings indicate that 586 dams have been documented in the NSWCD inventory for the entire province. The most common main purpose of dams built throughout Nova Scotia is for hydropower production (21%) and only 14% of dams in the database contain associated fish passage technology. Findings indicate that the SU is impacted by 279 dams, resulting in an upstream habitat loss of 3,008 km of stream length, equivalent to 9.28% of the total stream length within the SU. The most extensive amount of loss occurred from 1920-1930. The IBoF was found to have 131 dams resulting in an upstream habitat loss of 1, 299 km of stream length, equivalent to 7.1% of total stream length. The most extensive amount of upstream habitat loss occurred from 1930-1940. I also examined if given what I have learned about the locations and dates of dam installations, are existent fish population data sufficient to assess the impacts of dams on the IBoF and SU Atlantic salmon populations in Nova Scotia? Results indicate that dams have caused a widespread upstream loss of freshwater habitat in Nova Scotia howeverfish population data do not exist to examine the direct impact of dam construction on the IBoF and SU Atlantic salmon populations in Nova Scotia.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Scotia Inland Water Boundaries Item River, Stream Or Brook
    SCHEDULE II 1. (Subsection 2(1)) Nova Scotia inland water boundaries Item River, Stream or Brook Boundary or Reference Point Annapolis County 1. Annapolis River The highway bridge on Queen Street in Bridgetown. 2. Moose River The Highway 1 bridge. Antigonish County 3. Monastery Brook The Highway 104 bridge. 4. Pomquet River The CN Railway bridge. 5. Rights River The CN Railway bridge east of Antigonish. 6. South River The Highway 104 bridge. 7. Tracadie River The Highway 104 bridge. 8. West River The CN Railway bridge east of Antigonish. Cape Breton County 9. Catalone River The highway bridge at Catalone. 10. Fifes Brook (Aconi Brook) The highway bridge at Mill Pond. 11. Gerratt Brook (Gerards Brook) The highway bridge at Victoria Bridge. 12. Mira River The Highway 1 bridge. 13. Six Mile Brook (Lorraine The first bridge upstream from Big Lorraine Harbour. Brook) 14. Sydney River The Sysco Dam at Sydney River. Colchester County 15. Bass River The highway bridge at Bass River. 16. Chiganois River The Highway 2 bridge. 17. Debert River The confluence of the Folly and Debert Rivers. 18. Economy River The highway bridge at Economy. 19. Folly River The confluence of the Debert and Folly Rivers. 20. French River The Highway 6 bridge. 21. Great Village River The aboiteau at the dyke. 22. North River The confluence of the Salmon and North Rivers. 23. Portapique River The highway bridge at Portapique. 24. Salmon River The confluence of the North and Salmon Rivers. 25. Stewiacke River The highway bridge at Stewiacke. 26. Waughs River The Highway 6 bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR REFERENCE USE ONL Y DO NOT Removt from LIBRARY
    Canada. F isbcries Service Maritimes Region. R csource Development Branch MANUSCRIPT REPORT I+ Environment Canada Environnement Canada RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT BRANCH .. " ' IÎÏI ~ Îl ~l Ïl\ij fü1imÎ l~I Îl \ i1 li~ ~Î~Ïil l I 'J 09093266 A Preliminary Investigation of the Striped Bass, Roccus saxatilis, Fishery Resource in the Annapolis River System, and the General Distribution of Striped Bass in Other Areas in Southwestern Nova Scotia by G. H. PENNEY FOR REFERENCE USE ONL Y DO NOT REMOvt FROM LIBRARY f h~trlts Stnlct 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Hallfa1, N.S. 1l7d.- Restricted MANUSCRIPT REPORT No. 73- 4 A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE STRIPED BASS, Roccus saxatilis ~ FISHERY RESOURCE IN THE ANNAPOLIS RIVER SYSTEM, AND THE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OF STRIPED BASS IN OTHER AREAS IN SOUTHWESTERN NOVA SCOTIA BY G.H. PENNEY Restricted A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE STRIPED BASS, Roccus s axatilis , FISHERY RESOURCE IN THE ANNAPOLIS RIVER SYSTEM, AND THE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OF STRIPED BASS IN OTHER AREAS IN SOUTHWESTERN NOVA SCOTIA BY G.H. PENNEY DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FISHERIES SERVICE RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT BRANCH HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA MARCH, 1973. CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION . • . • . • . • . • . • 1 METHODS 8 RESULTS 10 (a) Angling Statistics (1951-1972)-Annapolis River system . ....................................... 10 (b) Length, Weight, Sex, and Age of Striped Bass sampled from the Annapolis River in 1972 .....• 12 (c) Residence Distribution of Anglers from which Samples were obtained ........................ 16 (d) Angling Pressure for Striped Bass during June, July, and August, 1972, at the Annapolis 18 Causeway ..............•....................... (e) General Distribution and Abundance of Striped Bass in Other Areas in Southwestern Nova 20 Scotia ....................................... DISCUSSION - RECOMMENDATIONS .......................
    [Show full text]
  • South Western Nova Scotia
    Netukulimk of Aquatic Natural Life “The N.C.N.S. Netukulimkewe’l Commission is the Natural Life Management Authority for the Large Community of Mi’kmaq /Aboriginal Peoples who continue to reside on Traditional Mi’Kmaq Territory in Nova Scotia undisplaced to Indian Act Reserves” P.O. Box 1320, Truro, N.S., B2N 5N2 Tel: 902-895-7050 Toll Free: 1-877-565-1752 2 Netukulimk of Aquatic Natural Life N.C.N.S. Netukulimkewe’l Commission Table of Contents: Page(s) The 1986 Proclamation by our late Mi’kmaq Grand Chief 4 The 1994 Commendation to all A.T.R.A. Netukli’tite’wk (Harvesters) 5 A Message From the N.C.N.S. Netukulimkewe’l Commission 6 Our Collective Rights Proclamation 7 A.T.R.A. Netukli’tite’wk (Harvester) Duties and Responsibilities 8-12 SCHEDULE I Responsible Netukulimkewe’l (Harvesting) Methods and Equipment 16 Dangers of Illegal Harvesting- Enjoy Safe Shellfish 17-19 Anglers Guide to Fishes Of Nova Scotia 20-21 SCHEDULE II Specific Species Exceptions 22 Mntmu’k, Saqskale’s, E’s and Nkata’laq (Oysters, Scallops, Clams and Mussels) 22 Maqtewe’kji’ka’w (Small Mouth Black Bass) 23 Elapaqnte’mat Ji’ka’w (Striped Bass) 24 Atoqwa’su (Trout), all types 25 Landlocked Plamu (Landlocked Salmon) 26 WenjiWape’k Mime’j (Atlantic Whitefish) 26 Lake Whitefish 26 Jakej (Lobster) 27 Other Species 33 Atlantic Plamu (Salmon) 34 Atlantic Plamu (Salmon) Netukulimk (Harvest) Zones, Seasons and Recommended Netukulimk (Harvest) Amounts: 55 SCHEDULE III Winter Lake Netukulimkewe’l (Harvesting) 56-62 Fishing and Water Safety 63 Protecting Our Community’s Aboriginal and Treaty Rights-Community 66-70 Dispositions and Appeals Regional Netukulimkewe’l Advisory Councils (R.N.A.C.’s) 74-75 Description of the 2018 N.C.N.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A River Runs Through It: an Archaeological Survey of the Upper
    Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-47882-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-47882-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privee, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont ete enleves de cette these.
    [Show full text]
  • Sackville Rivers Floodplain Study: Phase I Final Report
    Sackville Rivers Floodplain Study: Phase I Final Report Halifax Regional Municipality 45 Akerley Boulevard Dartmouth Nova Scotia B3B 1J7 11102282 | Report No 4 | October 30 2015 October 30, 2015 Reference No. 11102282-4 Mr. Cameron Deacoff Halifax Regional Municipality PO Box 1749 Halifax, NS B3J 3A5 Dear Mr. Deacoff: Re: Sackville Rivers Floodplain Study: Phase I Final Report GHD is pleased to provide the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) with the attached Final Report for the Sackville Rivers Floodplain Study: Phase I. This report presents the final results for this study, including: flood and sea level frequency analyses, joint flood and sea level probability analysis, hydraulic modelling, topo-bathymetric survey data collection, and analysis of flooding factors. Data sources, methodology, and results are described in detail. Recommendations for the Phase II Study are also provided. All of which is respectfully submitted, GHD Yours truly, Juraj M. Cunderlik, Ph.D., P.Eng. Prof. Edward McBean, Ph.D., P.Eng. Project Manager QA/QC Reviewer Allyson Bingeman, Ph.D., P.Eng. Andrew Betts, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Statistical Hydrology Specialist Hydraulic Modelling Specialist JC/jp/3 Encl. GHD Limited 45 Akerley Boulevard Dartmouth Nova Scotia B3B 1J7 Canada T 902 468 1248 F 902 468 2207 W www.ghd.com Executive Summary The lower reaches of the Sackville River have been the site of several instances of flooding over the last decade, which has been a significant issue for the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM). A Hydrotechnical Study of the Sackville River was performed in 1981, and a Hydrotechnical Study of the Little Sackville River delineated the floodplain in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Culture Development
    FISH CULTURE DEVELOPMENT A Report of the Fish Culture Development Branch of the Conservation and Development Service , 1950 Reprinted from the Twenty.-first Annual Report of the Department of Fisheries of Canada FISH CULTURE DEVELOPMENT ITH fisheries, as with other natural resources capable of self-perpetuation, W conservation is of prime concern. Since fish is a "free" resource, man may catch too many, and deplete the stocks to a point where fishing is no longer profit, able. Therefore, controls are necessary to permit the fisherman to take the maxi­ mum catches on a continuing year after year basis. In the broad analysis Canada follows two definite courses of conservation: 1. The enforcement of various types of catch restrictions to ensure sufficient natural seeding for a sustained maximum yield. 2. To apply where possible, cultural methods of all types both to improve environmental conditions for natural propagation and also to use artificial methods in cases where an aid is needed. The Department's work in this connection is carried out by the newly-formed Conservation and Development Service. One branch of the Service-the Protec­ tion Branch-directs the work of the Protection Officers on both coasts. Another branch of the Service-the Fish Culture Development Branch-is responsible for the construction of fishways to enable fish to by-pass darn:s and fqr the maintenance of hatcheries to re-stock waters in federally administered areas. These two services are closely integrated. The Protection Officers enforce the regulations pertaining to restricted areas, closed seasons, limitations in location and types of gear.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Harvesting Information
    Shellfish Harvesting It is very important before you col lect any shell­ Fishe ries Environmen t Canada fish that you ensure the area is not closed . and Oceans Environmental Protection Service Information A check is as simple as using the local tele­ phone directory to find the federal fisheries •• •• office nearest you or ca ll one of the central offices listed below. Maritime New Brunswick Nova Scotia Prince Edward Island St. Andrews Moncion Sydney Halifax Charlottetown Shellfisheries Box 210 P.O . Box 5030 P.O. Box 1085 P 0 . Box 550 P.O. Box 1236 EOG 2XO E1C 9B6 B1 p 6J7 B3J 2S7 C1A 7M8 (506) 529-8847 (506) 758-9044 (902) 564-7276 (902) 426-24 73 (902) 566-7800 Tracadie Yarmouth Antigonish Guide .,. P.O. Box 1670 215 Main St reet P.O. Box 1183 EOC 2BO B5A 1C6 B2G 2M5 (506) 395-6321 (902) 742-9122 (902) 863-5670 Liverpool P.O. Box 190 BOT 1KO (902) 354-3459 Canada Introduction Fresh shellfish can be purchased at any of As with an y food , care must be taken to ensure hundreds of fish markets , and are served at th at the shellfish gathered are not contam­ Mussel One of the great attractions of Canada's Mari­ restaurants and snack bars throughout the inated. This guide has been prepared to pro­ time provinces is the selection of seafood del­ Maritimes. vide the recreational digger with information (Mytilus edulis) icacies to be enjoyed here. Among the pertaining to the safe harvest of shellfish in the Rocky shores along the three provinces' coast­ favourites are the many varieties of shellfish In search of a recreational outing ? Shellfish Maritimes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Atlantic Salmon Plamu Final
    2016-2017 ATLANTIC SALMON, PLAMU, CONSERVATION HARVESTING PLAN Effective June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017 Mi’kmaq, Salmon, and Traditional Practices The Mi’kmaq people continue to rely on Atlantic salmon for food. Over time, the Mi’kmaq developed an intimate and sacred relationship with the salmon and sought ways to manage populations while sustaining themselves. This relationship continues today and the species remains an important part of the Mi’kmaq way of life. The principles of Netukulimk guide the harvest of salmon. In particular, taking what is needed, preventing waste and wasteful use of salmon, treating salmon with respect, and giving back to Mother Earth what is not consumed. Traditional Mi’kmaq management of Atlantic salmon was flexible and based on a balance of life stage and watershed harvest strategies. The Mi’kmaq would harvest a balance of large and small salmon, in open waters and in rivers. For example, some harvesters would harvest large salmon as they felt they were nearing the end of their lives, while other harvesters would harvest smaller salmon to let the larger ones reproduce. A key component of traditional Mi’kmaq management of salmon is based on which salmon are at hand during the time of harvest. If more large salmon are present than small, then more large salmon would be taken than small. The delicate balance in nature must be respected and is reflected when harvesting (Denny & Fanning, 2016a). Current allocations of Atlantic salmon are insufficient or not available for many of the Mi’kmaq people in Nova Scotia. At present, the Mi’kmaq communities of Nova Scotia have salmon allocations that are inadequate for a population of over 14,958 status Mi’kmaq registered to Nova Scotia bands.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology Map of Basaltic Rocks of the North Mountain
    Part of NTS Sheets 21A/05, 21A/12, 21A/13, 21B/08 and 21B/09 Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources - Mineral Resources Branch OFM ME 2010-9 44°40'N 66°W 65°50'W 251000mE 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 260 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 270 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 280 81 82 83 84 85 86 287000mE N N 000m 000m 48 49 65 Legend 49 A n MESOZOIC D 47 n a i g p 64 b o y l i s C TRIASSIC C o u o n u t n y t y FUNDY GROUP NORTH MOUNTAIN FORMATION 46 63 BRIER ISLAND MEMBER (Upper Flow Unit) (^Fnmb) : this unit ( À 150 m) occurs at the ^Fnmb top of the basalt sequence, conformable on unit ^Fnmm and outcrops extensively on the northern shorelines except in the central part of the mapped area where it is notably absent. The basalt is massive, dark grey to grey-green with microcrysts (À 5%) of plagioclase and pyroxene with variable (À 30-40%) amounts of mesostasis in a medium- 45 grained, ophitic-textured host. This unit consists of 1 or 2 flow sheets, has colonnade- 62 style polygonal jointing (À 1 m) and, at the base, inclined pipe vesicles occur. The lower 10-20 m locally (e.g., Morden, Margaretsville) contains felsic material (ca. 65-74 wt. % SiO2 ) in the form of dykes, amoeboid masses and spectacular segregation pipes (3-60 cm; 10-15/m2 ) that are sometimes cored by agate and crystalline silica.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine Grape Site Selection in Nova Scotia Conclusions from the Annapolis Valley Temperature Mapping Project 2004-2008
    Wine Grape Site Selection in Nova Scotia Conclusions from the Annapolis Valley Temperature Mapping Project 2004-2008 Background Nova Scotia’s commercial wine industry is relatively young, beginning in the early 1980’s, and it has long been known that its cool climate is marginal for wine grape production. Along with this recognition is the appropriate need to identify the best areas within the Province for growing wine grapes, in terms of frost free period (FFP), growing degree day (GDD) accumulation, and minimum winter temperatures. Some basics were known, such as the Annapolis Valley is a warmer area, that sloped sites have better air drainage and therefore longer frost free periods, that if you go inland winter minimums decrease, and that if you go too close to the coast cooling becomes excessive. However, more refined questions remained unanswered – such as “where are the best places within the Annapolis Valley to grow wine grapes?”, “what happens as you go east to west in the Annapolis Valley?”, “how do other valleys (eg. the Gaspereau, Bear River and LaHave River Valleys) compare to the Annapolis Valley?”, “what is the effect of increasing elevation on a slope?”, and “what is the effect of slope orientation?”. The Annapolis Valley Temperature Mapping Study attempted to answer some of these questions in a five-year study from 2004 to 2008. Soil types were not a part of this analysis. While investigating the above questions, it is important to have benchmarks that define climatic suitability for wine grape production (Table 1). Most experts agree that a minimum of 900 growing degree days (GDD) above 10 °C are required for wine grape production and ideally above 1300.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopt a Stream 2008 Report to the Nova Scotia Sportfish Habitat Fund
    2008 Report to the Nova Scotia Sportfish Habitat Fund Bluenose Coastal Action Foundation summer crew and volunteers floating rocks across the Mushamush to backfill one of deflectors installed to narrow and deepen the channel. Submitted by: Amy Weston Nova Scotia Salmon Association Adopt-A-Stream Program Manager April 2009 NSSA/Adopt-a-Stream 2008 Report to NS Sportfish Habitat Fund Executive Summary In 2008 the Adopt-A-Stream program celebrated its 10th anniversary with the Nova Scotia Salmon Association, which administers the program on behalf of the recreational fishing community. Funding received from the Nova Scotia Sportfish Habitat Fund is distributed to community groups for habitat restoration projects approved through the review committee process. This year Adopt-A-Stream supported the project work of 22 community groups. Fish habitat restoration was conducted in 45 watercourses. As a result, approximately 85,000 square metres of in-stream fish habitat was restored and 73,000 square meters of riparian habitat protected and revegetated. There were 6645 trees planted in riparian zones. The Nova Scotia Sportfish Habitat Fund contributed $240,000. An additional $878 was carried over from previous years, making the total funds available to projects $240,878. Community groups secured matching cash and in-kind contributions of $494,797. The volunteer commitment to the projects included more than 8000 hours of volunteer time. The habitat crew of the Inverness South Anglers The Salmon River Salmon Association crew Committee of the Mabou & District Community members finish a digger log installation on Development Association have been a team for Belliveau Brook, Digby Co.
    [Show full text]