Ccny Grantee 2011 Ethnic.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Community Outlet Editorial Director Name Ed. Dir. Email Address Ed
Community Outlet Editorial Director Ed. Dir. Email Ed. Dir. Phone Name Address Number African African Network Inza Dosso africvisiontv@yahoo. 646-505-9952 Television com; mmustaf25@yahoo. com African African Sun Times Abba Onyeani africansuntimes@gma973-280-8415 African African-American Steve Mallory blacknewswatch@ao 718-598-4772 Observer l.com African Afrikanspot Isseu Diouf Campbell [email protected] 917-204-1582 om African Afro Heritage Olutosin Mustapha [email protected] 718-510-5575 Magazine om African Afro Times African Afrobeat Radio / Wuyi Jacobs submissions@afrobe 347-559-6570 WBAI 99.5 FM atradio.com African Amandla Kofi Ayim kayim@amandlanew 973-731-1339 s.com African Sunu Afrik Radio El Hadji Ndao [email protected] 646-505-7487 m; sunuafrikradio@gma il.com African American Black and Brown Sharon Toomer info@blackandbrow 917-721-3150 News nnews.com African American Diaspora Radio Pearl Phillip [email protected] 718-771-0988 African American Harlem World Eartha Watts Hicks; harlemworldinfo@ya 646-216-8698 Magazine Danny Tisdale hoo.com African American New York Elinor Tatum elinor.tatum@amste 212-932-7465 Amsterdam News rdamnews.com; info@amsterdamne ws.com African American New York Beacon Miatta Smith nybeaconads@yaho 212-213-8585 o.com African American Our Time Press David Greaves editors@ourtimepre 718-599-6828 ss.com African American The Black Star News Milton Allimadi [email protected] 646-261-7566 m African American The Network Journal Rosalind McLymont [email protected] 212-962-3791 ; [email protected] Albanian Illyria Ruben Avxhiu [email protected] 212-868-2224 om; [email protected] m Arab Allewaa Al-Arabi Angie Damlaki angie_damlakhi@ya 646-707-2012 hoo.com Arab Arab Astoria Abdul Azmal arabastoria@yahoo. -
A Guide to Innovative, Quality Long Term Care Options in New York Urce
2011 A Guide to Innovative, Quality Long Term Care Options in New York urce 555 WEST 57TH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10019 212.258.5330 P 212.258.5331 F CareSo WWW.CCLCNY.ORG CareSource A Guide to Innovative, Quality Long Term Care Options in New York CCLC Staff Contacts: About CCLC The Continuing Care Leadership Coalition (CCLC) is a membership Scott C. Amrhein 212-506-5409 and advocacy organization representing more than 100 of the nation’s President most innovative and comprehensive not-for-profit and public long term care organizations in the New York metropolitan area and be- Roxanne G. Tena-Nelson 212-506-5412 yond. CCLC’s establishment in 2003 as an affiliated entity of the Executive Vice President Greater New York Hospital Association (GNYHA) highlights the growing importance of continuing care services in today’s health care Desmond D’Sa 212-506-5458 marketplace. Vice President, Finance CCLC’s purpose is to shape, through advocacy, research, and educa- Diane J. Barrett 212-259-0741 tion, an environment that supports the delivery of, and access to, Director of Government Relations continuing care services of the highest quality and to provide State and national leadership in advancing effective continuing care policies Harrison Fox 212-554-7215 and practices through the collective experience, vision, and effort of Project Manager, CCITI NY our members. Kathryn Santos 212-506-5413 The members of CCLC provide mission-driven services across the Manager of Quality Improvement continuum of care to people of all ages throughout the New York Initiatives metropolitan area and beyond. -
THE CITY of NEW YORK MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 3 59 East 4Th Street - New York, NY 10003 Phone (212) 533 -5300 - [email protected]
THE CITY OF NEW YORK MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 3 59 East 4th Street - New York, NY 10003 Phone (212) 533 -5300 www.cb3manhattan.org - [email protected] Jamie Rogers, Board Chair Susan Stetzer, District Manager District Needs Statement for Fiscal Year 2019 Introduction Community Board 3 Manhattan spans the East Village, Lower East Side, and a vast amount of Chinatown. It is bounded by 14th Street to the north, the East River to the east, the Brooklyn Bridge to the south, and Fourth Avenue and the Bowery to the west, extending to Baxter and Pearl Streets south of Canal Street. This community is filled with a diversity of cultures, religions, incomes, and languages. Its character comes from its heritage as a historic and present day first stop for many immigrants. CD 3 is one of the largest board Districts and is the fourth most densely populated District, with approximately 164,063 people.1 Our residents are very proud of their historic and diverse neighborhood, however, the very characteristics that make this District unique also make it a challenging place to plan and ensure services for all residents and businesses. Demographic Change The CD 3 population is changing in many ways. The 2000 census reported that 23% of our population, over 38,000 of our residents, required income support. By 2014, this number had jumped to about 41% of the total population, over 68,000 persons.2 The number of people receiving Medicaid-only assistance also continues to increase, climbing from 45,724 in 20053 to more than 48,200 people currently.4 Our community is an example of the growing income inequality that is endemic in New York City. -
THE CITY of NEW YORK MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 3 59 East 4Th Street - New York, NY 10003 Phone (212) 533- 5300 - [email protected]
THE CITY OF NEW YORK MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 3 59 East 4th Street - New York, NY 10003 Phone (212) 533- 5300 www.cb3manhattan.org - [email protected] Jamie Rogers, Board Chair Susan Stetzer, District Manager November 2017 Full Board Minutes Meeting of Community Board 3 held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 6:30pm at PS 20, 166 Essex Street. Public Session: Kevin Crocilla: (Post Master Announcement) 600 buildings in the borough of Manhattan (66 buildings in CB3 alone) that Postal carriers do not have access to. Key keepers are being requested by the Post Office for these landlords allowing postal carriers access to the buildings. Micaela O'Connell: Update on FEMA construction activity within the Lower East Side: Smith, Two Bridges, Baruch, La Guardia. JK Canepa: Supporting the Mayor's public response to return PS 64/CHARAS back to community use. Aresh Javadi: Executive Director of MORE GARDENS and is Supporting the Mayor's public response to return PS64/CHARAS back to community use. Rosemarie Hameed: Sharing her views on political and spiritual topics. In support of more gardens. Khadjah Mills: Informing the board about the Citizens Committee for NYC Neighborhood grant in January. Kathy Wakehan: Resident of E 12th street in support of rezoning Tech-Hub proposal. Requesting CB3 and the Mayors office support protection of the buildings within the 4th avenue corridor. Katy Stokes: President of PTA at NEST+M. Requesting a Traffic and Sanitation Study if a proposal to re-open the pedestrian pathway on Stanton Street is considered by the Mayor's office. Vaylateena Jones: There are no hospitals in community District 3 and Mount Sinai Beth Israel is the closest hospital north of CD3. -
Educational Considerations, Vol. 40(2) Full Issue
Educational Considerations Volume 40 Number 2 Article 9 3-1-2013 Educational Considerations, vol. 40(2) Full Issue David C. Thompson Kansas State University Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations Part of the Higher Education Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Thompson, David C. (2013) "Educational Considerations, vol. 40(2) Full Issue," Educational Considerations: Vol. 40: No. 2. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.1088 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Considerations by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thompson: Educational Considerations, vol. 40(2) Full Issue Spring 2013 Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 1 Educational Considerations, Vol. 40, No. 2 [2013], Art. 9 Educational Considerations is celebrating its Celebrating 40th anniversary. The biannual publication was first produced in 1973 – and has been hosted at Kansas State University since its inception. 40 Years of Educational I credit the publication’s success to strong leadership who provided this venue as a voice Considerations for educational issues, particularly educational finance and policy issues. Editors have carefully selected thematic issues focusing on real challenges that impact education discussions in a meaningful and substantive ways. The journal has flourished because of its relevance to the world of theory and practice, as well as theory into practice. As the journal continues in its growth pattern, it is particularly noteworthy that in 2012 it became an affiliate journal for the National Education Finance Conference. -
Annual Report 2012
Cover Back Spine: (TBA) Front PMS 032U Knock out Annual Report 2012 LETTER FROM THE MAYOR 4 PART I: 2007–2012: A PERIOD OF AGENCY INNOVATION 11 PART II: AGENCY PORTFOLIO, FY12 37 PROGRAMSERVICES 39 PROGRAM SERVICES AWARD RECIPIENTS 40 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT FUND PANELISTS 50 CULTURAL AFTER SCHOOL ADVENTURES GRANT RECIPIENTS 53 CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS GROUP 58 CAPITALPROJECTS 63 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDED 66 RIBBON CUTTINGS 68 GROUNDBREAKINGS 69 EQUIPMENT PURCHASES 69 COMMUNITY ARTS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 70 30TH ANNUAL AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN DESIGN RECIPIENTS 71 PERCENT FOR ART PROGRAM 72 MATERIALS FOR THE ARTS 74 RECIPIENTS OF DONATED GOODS 76 PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS IN ARTS EDUCATION PROGRAMS 88 CULTURAL AFFAIRS ADVISORY COMMISSION 90 MAYOR’S AWARDS FOR ARTS AND CULTURE 91 DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS STAFF 92 P HO TO CREDITSPHOTO 94 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 95 4 Letter from The Mayor NEW YORK CITY: STRENGTHENING INVESTMENT IN THE ARTS Our City’s cultural organizations are essential arts are to New York City’s vibrancy and to improving to ensuring that New York remains one of the world’s the lives of New Yorkers and visitors from around the great cities. A magnet for talent from around the world, world. In addition, the development of new information our creative community is also a thriving small business technology systems has enabled the Department to track sector that exists in every neighborhood throughout these services and further advocate on behalf of culture’s the five boroughs. That is why our Administration has tremendous impact on our City. made supporting the arts a top priority, and why over And we continue to push boundaries in expanding our the past five years—despite challenging times—we have service to the creative sector. -
Early Outcomes Report for Cuny Asap Table of Contents
Early Outcomes Report for City University of New York (CUNY) Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) November 2009 PREPARED BY: DONNA LINDERMAN CUNY ASAP University Director EVALUATION & DATA ANALYSIS BY: ZINETA KOLENOVIC ASAP Evaluation Specialist November 16, 2009 Early Outcomes Report for City University of New York (CUNY) Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) PREPARED BY: DONNA LINDERMAN CUNY ASAP University Director EVALUATION & ANALYSIS BY: ZINETA KOLENOVIC ASAP Evaluation Specialist For More Information: Donna Linderman University Director Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) CUNY Office of Academic Affairs 535 East 80th Street, Room 610 New York, NY 10075 (212) 794-5754-tel [email protected] www.cuny.edu/asap EARLY OUTCOMES REPORT FOR CUNY ASAP TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S .........................................................................................................i L I S T O F T A B L E S A N D G R A P H S ....................................................................................ii A B O U T T H E C E N T E R F O R E C O N O M I C O P P O R T U N I T Y ................................. iii E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y ..................................................................................................... v I N T R O D U C T I O N ................................................................................................................... 1 A S A P I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O U T C O M E S ......................................................... 6 P R O F I L E O F A S A P S T U D E N T S ................................................................................... -
Working Papers
working papers 2012 The Evolution of School Support Networks in New York City Eric Nadelstern Foreword by Christine Campbell CRPE Working Paper #2012-2 center on reinventing public education University of Washington Bothell 425 Pontius Ave N, Ste 410, Seattle, WA 98109-5450 206.685.2214 • fax: 206.221.7402 • www.crpe.org This report was made possible by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. We thank them for their support, but acknowledge that the views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the foundation. CRPE Working Papers have not been subject to the Center’s Quality Assurance Process. THE PORTFOLIO SCHOOL DISTRICTS PROJECT Portfolio management is an emerging strategy in public education, one in which school districts manage a portfolio of diverse schools that are provided in many ways—including through traditional district operation, charter operators, and nonprofit organizations—and hold all schools accountable for performance. In 2009, the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) launched the Portfolio School Districts Project to help state and local leaders understand practical issues related to the design and implementation of the portfolio school district strategy, and to support portfolio school districts in learning from one another. A Different Vision of the School District Traditional School Districts Portfolio School Districts Schools as permanent investments Schools as contingent on performance “One best system” of schooling Differentiated system of schools Government as sole provider Diverse groups provide schools Analysis of Portfolio District Practices To understand how these broad ideas play out in practice, CRPE is studying an array of districts (Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland, Denver, Hartford, New Orleans, and New York City) that are implementing the portfolio strategy. -
Community Garden Survey New York City Results 2009/2010
Community Garden Survey New York City Results 2009/2010 1 Authors Mara Gittleman 2009/2010 Compton Mentor Fellow, GrowNYC Lenny Librizzi GrowNYC Edie Stone GreenThumb, NYC Department of Parks & Recreation Acknowledgements The 2009/2010 Community Garden Survey and Report would not be possible without generous funding from the Compton Foundation. Special thanks to all of the staff at GrowNYC and GreenThumb; Bob Lewis and Christina Grace of the NY State Department of Agriculture and Markets; Guennivere Ury, Rob Callaghan, and Marcello Gasdia of Hunter College; and everyone else who helped design the survey, stuff envelopes, enter data, call gardeners, and visit gardens. Community Garden Survey packet designed by Nora Chovanec. 2 More grows in the garden than the gardener sows - Old Spanish Proverb 3 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 HIGHLIGHTS 6 BACKGROUND & HISTORY 7 HOW MANY GARDENS ARE THERE TODAY? 9 SURVEY RESULTS 10 ADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATION & MEMBERSHIP & MEMBERSHIP 10 10 LANDLAND OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP 11 11 ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION AFFILIATIONS AFFILIATIONS 11 11 MEMBERSHIPMEMBERSHIP 12 12 FOODFOOD PRODUCTION PRODUCTION 14 14 SPACESPACE DEVOTED DEVOTED TO FOODTO FOOD PRODUCTION PRODUCTION 14 14 ENDEND USE USE OF FOODOF FOOD GROWN GROWN IN GARDEN IN GARDEN 14 14 TYPESTYPES OF FOODOF FOOD GROWN GROWN 15 15 FRUITFRUIT TREES TREES 19 19 ORNAMENTALORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS, PLANTINGS, SHADE SHADE TREES, TREES, & WATER & WATER GARDENS GARDENS 21 21 COMPOSTINGCOMPOSTING 22 22 STRUCTURESSTRUCTURES 24 24 SOCIALSOCIAL STRUCTURES STRUCTURES -
Evading Equity: Principal Autonomy Under the Bloomberg-Klein Market Regime
Evading Equity: Principal Autonomy Under the Bloomberg-Klein Market Regime Tiffanie C. Lewis-Durham Assistant Professor Department of Educational Leadership, Evaluation, & Organizational Development University of Louisville 1905 South 1st Street Louisville, Kentucky 40292 [email protected] 502-852-0637 Abstract Using New York City schools as a case study, this study draws on interview data from principals, district consultants and administrators, and principal’s union representatives to explore the relationship between market-based reform and colorblindness in educational policy. The study is informed by colorblindness theory, which explores the subtle and unconscious ways equity oriented goals are undermined. I also draw on urban regime theory, which highlights the ability of political, private, and other local actors to use resources and power to build coalitions. Results reveal market-based regimes, supported by business and political partnerships, are likely to relegate issues of equity to the periphery while they focus on privatizing decision-making and shaping schools to reflect market place values. Keywords: urban regimes, principal autonomy, educational equity, urban school reform Introduction Access to high quality education is a critical issue for many minority children living in the most impoverished communities in the United States. Research shows minority children often lack access to high quality teachers and schools (Kozol, 2005; Schott Foundation, 2012). To decrease the gap in access between minority and non-minority children, some school districts serving large populations of minority students have granted more autonomy to principals at the school level (Honig & Rainey, 2012). While increased autonomy potentially provides principals with more power to address student needs directly, educational policies can sometimes act in contradiction to a principal’s autonomy. -
Jacob Henry Schiff Born January 10, 1847
JACOB HENRY SCHIFF BORN JANUARY 10, 1847. DIED SEPTEMBER 25, 1920 The American Jewish Year Book 5682 October 3, 1921, to September 22, 1922 Volume 23 Edited bv HARRY SCHNEIDERMAN for the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE PHILADELPHIA THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1921 Uewish C. P< EIS4- At COPYRIGHT, 1921, BY THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA NEWYORKUNIVERSITY WASHi^TON SQUARE LIBRARY CT CL tT w 1 RT PEEFACE The past year has witnessed no marked change in the life of the Jewish people. There has merely been a development according to tendencies resulting" from pre-war conditions and the events of the past seven years. In the chronology for 5681, although we have again reports of numerous acts of humiliation and violence committed against our brethren in Eastern Europe and Hungary, yet many hopeful signs of returning order, sanity and humanity are already visible, and there are indications that with the return of normal economic con- ditions and political stability the situation of the Jews in this region will greatly improve. In the meantime, the Jewry of the United States has become the new center of gravity of the Jewish people. If we may disregard several misguided, though dangerous, movements to transplant anti-Semitism on Ameri- can soil—movements which have met with failure thanks to the courage and clear vision of leaders of thought and opinion, and the spirit of justice and fairness which characterizes the American people—we may say that the Jews of the United States have been most favored of Providence in being spared all of the many evils and sorrows visited upon the Jews of Eastern Europe. -
Community Involvement Plan for the Newtown Creek Site
Newtown Creek NPL Site Community Involvement Plan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 2 Blank page inserted to facilitate double-sided printing. Newtown Creek Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Goals of the Community Involvement Plan ........................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Authority .............................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Project Structure and Roles .................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.1 Regulatory Oversight ................................................................................................................................. 1-2 Lead Agency.................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Partner Agencies (Trustees) ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.2 Potentially Responsible Parties ............................................................................................................ 1-3 Newtown Creek Group .............................................................................................................................. 1-4