Cultural Inventory for Hillsdale Lake, Kansas 5 Volume I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Inventory for Hillsdale Lake, Kansas 5 Volume I C -I 3 ' CULTURAL INVENTORY FOR HILLSDALE LAKE, KANSAS 5 VOLUME I By: Dr. Arthur H. Rohn and Craig F. Woodman Final Report to United States Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District for work done under Contract No. DACWU1-76-M-078Ì4 and No. DACWhl-?5-C-Ol68 Archaeology Laboratory ^Department of Anthropology I Wichita State Ujaiversity 4 1976, ^ i LIBRARY NOV 2 31977 Bureau of Reclamation' Ponvpr BUREAU (fc'ftfftiAfaMoKI DENVER LIBRARY \ 92082757 0* 92082757 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME I Introduction 1 The Survey 2 Tentative Culture History 3 Nebo Hill U Late Archaic U Plains Woodland 6 Pomona 10 Post Pomona 12 Historic Euro-American 12 Sites of Unknown Cultural Affiliation 15 Project Impact 17 Proposed MitigationPlan 19 Table I 2h Table II 26 References 27 Appendix I Site Descriptions 1-1 VOLUME II Maps Appendix I 1975 Testing Results Appendix II Master Map VOLUME III Historical Report 1 Appendix I Assessment Rolls for Tontzville III-I-l Appendix II Abstracts - Lyons (Marysville), Tontzville III-II-l Cultural Inventory for Hillsdale Lake, Kansas By: Arthur H. Rohn and Craig F. Woodman Introduction Current plans call for creation of the Hillsdale Reservoir behind an earthen dam in Northwest Miami County, Kansas, The dam will back up water along Bull Creek and Little Bull Creek covering approximately 7,It00 acres with a total project area of more than 12,000 acres. Bull Creek flows southeastward into the Marais des Cygnes River, The project area lies within the Osage Plains sub-area of the Central Plains physiographic province. The Osage Plains section is characterized by gently dipping strata of low relief and northeast-southwest trending escarpments. Underlying rocks of Pennsylvanian and Permian age include alternating beds of limestone, shale, and sandstone. The major rivers are entrenched and drain from northwest to southeast. Major topographical features of Miami County are the Marais des Cygnes River valley, its tributaries including Bull Creek, and the Upland Plains created by erosion of underlying sedimentary rock beds. The climate is subhumid to humid with moderate preci­ pitation and hot summers suitable for agricultural pursuits. While Bull and Little Bull Creeks flow most of the year, during dry seasons water supply is restricted to deep holes. Numerous plants and animals in the area provide a long list of 1. 2. potential food resources. Nuts, berries, leaves, shoots, and fruits are plentiful along with small mammals, reptiles, and shell fish within the stream bottom environments. Archaeological work in the Hillsdale Lake District began in 1965 when Wilfred Rusted of the Smithsonian River Basin Survey identified 33 sites through ground survey. Husted's records and survey collections have been loaned to Wichita State University by the Smithsonian Institution for one year. During 1968 and 1969, University of Kansas archaeologists conducted limited excavations at several sites and surveyed an additional 19 sites (Carrillo 1969). One site each of Pomona/ Central Plains and Plains Woodland affiliation were excavated (Carrillo 1973j Art* jet _al 1975)» end five other sites were tested. Wichita State University began work at Hillsdale in 1972, Through contracts with the National Park Service, we have excavated one Pomona/Central Plains house site, tested two others, and con­ tinued site surveying. In 197h, further excavations were conducted at the same Plains Woodland site earlier dug by the University of Kansas crews. This last investigation is described below. The Survey Our survey of both pre-historic and historic sites was designed to cover all of the topographic situations within the total project area. The valley floors of Bull and Little Bull Creeks are exten­ sively cultivated and cultural debris could be readily observed. 3. Dense woods along the streams themselves and thick grass cover on hills and bluff tops obscured the ground at these topographic units and reduced chances for identifying sites. All sites recorded by previous investigations were revisited, often more than once, and additional surface collections made. Site numbers were assigned to every discrete locus of cultural debris to pro­ vide relatively small units for distributional analyses. Several large site areas have been subdivided into separate loci designa­ ted with capital letters. The historic survey encompassed on-site inspections, interviews, and research in county and state archives. This intensive inventory has recorded 118 separately numbered sites, several of which represent two or more distinct loci. At least 70 identifiable cultural components have been recognized. As per agreement with the contracting officer, 8 of the 10 sites specified in Contract No. DACWhl-76-N-078U were extensively tested. The results of the tests at these sites are given in the Site Descriptions. (See Volume I, Appendix I) Tentative Culture History The following cultural complexes may be tentatively described from work already accomplished in the Hillsdale Archaeological District. Since most of our data come from remains visible on the ground surface, the descriptions are tenuous at this time. Interpretations have been drawn from known materials in eastern Kansas, the Osage River drainage, and the Kansas City region. a. Nebo Hill The oldest recognized cultural complex is marked by the presence of Nebo Hill points (Shippee 19b8$ 196b). At Hillsdale, Nebo Hill points (figure 1) have been recovered from five separate sites. One occurred in an undisturbed cultural deposit approxi­ mately % meter below ground surface at site lbMM27* Local collect ors have picked up numerous points from sites lbMM2 and lbMM21. We collected two from the surface of liiMM12B. A former farmer at Hillsdale found Nebo Hill points at site liiMMl by plowing down a terrace edge to reach deeper soils. Both this site and 1LMM27 probably contain undisturbed deposits of this cultural complex. All the other surface finds may or may not represent undisturbed deposits, especially since lbMM21 and lbMM2 have suffered consi­ derable damage from past flooding. Shippee (196b) describes Nebo Hill sites from hilltops and other high ground situations. All of our known occurrences in Hillsdale are in valley bottoms where they may have been covered by stream alluviation. This setting alone argues for a somewhat different ecological adaptation than that presently described. From similarities with other lanceolate points and the apparent associations of grooved ax heads and grinding stones (Shippee 19b8 196b), the age of the Nebo Hill Complex would seem to be Middle Archaic (ca. 5000-3000 B.C.). Late Archaic Existence of Late Archaic sites throughout eastern Kansas is figure 1 NERO HILL POINTS 6. marked by large stemmed and side-notched dart points. At Hills­ dale, we have identified side-notched point styles like Ensor and Ellis. Stemmed points include Table Rock, Edgewood, Gary, Langtry, and several other unnamed types with contracting stems. It is possible that some corner-notched styles with concave bases also belong to the Late Archaic. The presence of these points (figures 2, 3, U) from surface collections combined with the absence of pottery argues for the existence of Late Archaic components at at least 13 sites. Many of these points have appeared in surface collections from sites containing later occupational components. Several sites appear to have been damaged by flooding. Like the Nebo Hill Complex, these components may lie buried by alluvial deposits and later occupations. It is also possible that many of the sites of inde­ terminate cultural affiliation belong to this state since they produced no pottery. Presumably this stage dates from around 3000-200 B. C. Plains Woodland Large corner-notched or well made stemmed dart points to­ gether with thick grit-tempered pottery and ground stone celts mark the Plains Woodland occupation at Hillsdale. The lower component at site 1LMM26 (Artz et al 1975) exemplifies this cul­ tural complex. Even though Artz et al consider this site part of the Kansas City Hopewell, most of the distinctively Hopewellian characteristics are missing (Wedel 19ii3). Consequently, it may figure 2 LATE ARCHAIC POINTS figure 3 LATE ARCHAIC POINTS figure U figure U TOP LEFT: PLAINS WOODLAND POINTS BOTTOM & RIGHT ROW: LATE ARCHAIC 10. be more appropriate to simply label these kinds of manifestations as Plains Woodland. Plains Woodland materials have been recovered from 27 Hills­ dale sites. Many of these tend to cluster and may represent dif­ fuse settlements. While some of the cultural deposits obviously occur on or near the surface, others clearly occur below plow zone depths. In fact, it is even possible that as yet undiscovered components underlie later Pomona occupations. Plains Woodland occupation probably covers the range from about 200 B.C. to A.D. 800 (figure 5). Pomona By far, the most extensive occupation of Hillsdale was by people practicing a culture labeled Pomona (Witty 196?). Pomona sites are clearly marked by the presence of distinctive cord- marked pottery with small arrow points. In ceramics at least, Pomona closely resembles the Smoky Hill Aspect of the Central Plains Tradition (Wedel 1959)« Baked daub often occurs in surface collections from these sites. They are most often situated on low terraces in the flood plain and they tend to cluster around natural water holes in the stream channels. About 1/3 of the 5U recognized Pomona components probably represent house sites of one or two structures. The remainder seem to be simply specialized activity areas associated with the house sites. Any given cluster of Pomona sites may contain J or h probable house sites and 2 to 3 times as many of the specialized activity areas. This apparently figure 5 PLAINS WOODLAND POINTS 12. represents a diffuse settlement pattern closely attuned to exploitation of nearby environmental resources (figures 6, 7)» Post Pomona Two sites on Little Bull Creek yielded pottery with smooth surfaces and shell or sand temper. A small Fresno point was also found at one of these sites.
Recommended publications
  • Comparison of Sediment Deposition in Reservoirs of Four Kansas Watersheds David P
    Comparison of Sediment Deposition in Reservoirs of Four Kansas Watersheds David P. Mau and Victoria G. Christensen Reservoirs are a vital source of water Kansas in 1995. Nine supply, provide recreational opportunities, reservoir studies have been support diverse aquatic habitat, and carried out in cooperation provide flood protection throughout with the Bureau of Kansas. Understanding agricultural, Reclamation, the city of industrial, and urban effects on reservoirs Wichita, Johnson County is important not only for maintaining Unified Wastewater acceptable water quality in the reservoirs Districts, the Kansas but also for preventing adverse Department of Health and environmental effects. Excessive sediment Environment, and (or) the can alter the aesthetic qualities of Kansas Water Office. These reservoirs and affect their water quality studies were supported in and useful life. part by the Kansas State Water Plan Fund and Introduction evaluated sediment deposition along with Figure 1. Bottom-sediment cores were collected with a gravity Reservoir sediment studies are selected chemical corer mounted on a pontoon boat. The corer is lowered to a important because of the effect that constituents in sediment designated distance above the sediment and allowed to free sediment accumulation has on the quality cores (fig. 1) from fall to penetrate through the entire thickness of reservoir of water and useful life of the reservoir. reservoirs located in bottom sediment. Sediment deposition can affect benthic various climatic, organisms and alter the dynamics of the topographic, and geologic landscape annual precipitation ranges from about aquatic food chain. Reservoir sediment regions throughout Kansas and southern 24 inches at Webster Reservoir in north- studies also are important in relation to Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsdale Lake Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Revision to Eutrophication TMDL Originally Approved August 28, 2001
    MARAIS DES CYGNES RIVER BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody: Hillsdale Lake Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Revision to Eutrophication TMDL originally approved August 28, 2001 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Lower Marais des Cygnes Counties: Douglas, Franklin, Johnson, Miami HUC 8: 10290102 HUC 10 (12): 01 (01, 02, 03) Ecoregion: Central Irregular Plains, Osage Cuestas (40b) Drainage Area: 144 square miles Conservation Pool: Surface Area = 4,355 acres Watershed/Lake Ratio: 21:1 Maximum Depth = 14 meters Mean Depth = 5.7 meters Storage Volume = 77,665 acre-feet Estimated Retention Time = 1.15 years Mean Annual Inflow (2007-2012) = 90,509 acre-feet Mean Annual Discharge (2007-2012) = 76,598 acre-feet Constructed: 1981 Designated Uses: Primary Contact Recreation Class A; Special Aquatic Life Support; Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Groundwater Recharge; Industrial Water Supply; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use. 303(d) Listings: 2002, 2004, 2008, 2010 & 2012 Marais Des Cygnes River Basin Lakes Impaired Use: All uses in Hillsdale Lake are impaired to a degree by eutrophication. Water Quality Criteria: General – Narrative: Taste-producing and odor-producing substances of artificial origin shall not occur in surface waters at concentrations that interfere with the production of potable water by conventional water treatment processes, that impart an unpalatable flavor to edible aquatic or semiaquatic life or terrestrial wildlife, or that result in noticeable odors in the vicinity of surface waters (KAR 28-16-28e(b)(7)). 1 Nutrients - Narrative: The introduction of plant nutrients into streams, lakes, or wetlands from artificial sources shall be controlled to prevent the accelerated succession or replacement of aquatic biota or the production of undesirable quantities or kinds of aquatic life (KAR 28-16- 28e(c)(2)(A)).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2019
    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2019 Kansas Water Office September 2018 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas HUC 8 Watershed Map ±
    Kansas HUC 8 Watershed Map ± M I R S E S E W O R K O R U A F CR R K DRIFTWOOD LF C I S S C R I R , S Summerfield NY C S White Cloud R R P R PO A A Reserve Y N D R CR O A L KEY R R T I UR R B T IC T C N H Bern R Y U Mahaska O C O L LN G Oketo C R Hamlin B R A Hollenberg C W Upper Little Blue W R S HAC U C L KB C E Morrill E P R RR Upper Republican S L Y R M CR E R H R I R E Narka O C B A SE CR E X Sabetha M M RO R U TI Long Island C N S C O O I PRI R D D N Big Nemaha G I IG R Webber C CR B B A Republic D O Herndon C Munden R R South Fork Big Nemaha Highland Lower Sappa Middle Republican L R R M Hanover Fairview Hiawatha R S Beaver Lovewell Lake E C I Axtell Oneida F A L L Marysville CR A L C Beattie Robinson O VER P L C BEA P Almena T R Seneca W N A R CR Burr Oak ING Leona S Lower North Fork Solomon C Haddam SPR BROWN South Fork Republican NORTON Norton R Morrowville Severance Troy Oberlin Prairie View Belleville G Wathena RAWLINS Atwood Norcatur REPUBLIC R Elwood B Washington W E M R I Esbon Cuba MARSHALL NEMAHA G G Tarkio-Wolf Formoso I CHEYENNE McDonald A S L Powhattan Keith Sebeluis Lake Lebanon E W G C R Scandia A C SMITH Denton St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsdale Lake Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy 9-Element Watershed Plan Summary
    Hillsdale Lake Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy 9-Element Watershed Plan Summary Impairments to be addressed: • Directly addressing the High Priority TMDL for Eutrophication on Hillsdale Lake, which includes focusing on reducing the phosphorus and sediment loading within the watershed. • Hillsdale Lake is not listed as having a TMDL for sedimentation; however, the SLT believes sediment is currently present and increasing and is also therefore addressing this issue with this WRAPS plan. • BMPs implemented to address Hillsdale Lake will indirectly address the Medium Priority TMDLs for Eutrophication and Atrazine for Edgerton City Lake. Targeting Determinations: • From studies conducted, a Priority Targeted Area for BMP placement has been determined. • The Priority Targeted Area consists of a 3/4 mile buffer along each side of KDHE classified streams in the watershed, including adjacent to Hillsdale Lake. • Targeted included streams are: Big Bull Creek, Rock Creek, Little Bull Creek, Martin Creek, Smith Creek, and Spring Creek. • Priority Targeted Areas will address degraded fields lying adjected to streams and lakes, the BNSF Intermodal Facility, and upland areas containing high numbers of forested restoration sites or KDHE determined restoration sites. Priority areas are targeted for both cropland and livestock practices, based upon land use within the targeted HUC 12s. Best Management Practices and Load Reduction Goals Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address nutrients and sediment in the watershed were chosen by the SLT
    [Show full text]
  • KDHE Confirmed Zebra Mussel Waterbodies
    KDHE Confirmed Zebra Mussel Waterbodies Lake/Reservoir Name Month/Year Confirmed Stream/River Name Month/Year Confirmed El Dorado Lake August 2003 Missouri River near Kansas City, Kansas May 2001 Cheney Reservoir August 2004 Walnut River near Gordon August 2004 Winfield City Lake December 2006 Walnut River near Ark City November 2005 Perry Lake October 2007 Kansas River near Lawrence September 2009 Lake Afton July 2008 Kansas River near Desoto September 2009 Marion Lake July 2008 Ninnescah River near Belle Plaine September 2009 Wilson Lake October 2009 Kansas River near Lecompton August 2011 Milford Reservoir November 2009 Kansas River near Topeka May 2012 Council Grove City Lake June 2010 Kansas River near Wamego June 2012 Jeffery Energy Center Lakes May 2011 Walnut River near El Dorado July 2013 Council Grove Reservoir June 2011 Cottonwood River near Emporia August 2014 Melvern Reservoir June 2011 Neosho River near Neosho Rapids August 2014 Kanopolis Lake October 2011 Neosho River near Leroy August 2014 Coffey County Lake (Wolf Creek Lake) July 2012 Marais Des Cygnes River at Ottawa August 2015 John Redmond Reservoir August 2012 Neosho River near Humboldt September 2016 Chase State Fishing Lake September 2012 Marais Des Cygnes River at MO State Line June 2017 Wyandotte County Lake October 2012 Confirmed: Adult or juvenile mussels have been discovered (live or expired) in Lake Shawnee August 2013 waterbody for the first time and positively identified by eyesight. Glen Elder Reservoir (Waconda Lake) September 2013 Lake Wabunsee September 2013 Threatened: Waterbody at high risk to become infested with zebra mussels via the dispersal (passive or active transport) of the zebra mussel veliger (pre-shell Clinton Lake October 2013 microscopic larval stage).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2018
    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2018 Kansas Water Office 2017 Table of Contents CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 HILLSDALE LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 KANOPOLIS LAKE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 MILFORD LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 POMONA LAKE ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upk Conard.Indd 5 1/9/15 1:31 PM © University Press of Kansas
    © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents Foreword . .ix Preface.and.Acknowledgments . x Chapter 1. Introduction. .1 History ............................................................2 Geology and Geography .............................................3 Flora and Fauna .....................................................5 Climate and Weather ................................................6 Know Before You Go: Advice and Precautions ...........................8 Costs .............................................................11 Camping Information. 12 Contacts and Resources .............................................12 How to Use This Guide. 13 Top Trails .........................................................14 Chapter 2. Kansas City Metropolitan Area . .17 Ernie Miller Park and Nature Center ..................................19 Kill Creek Park ....................................................22 Olathe Prairie Center ...............................................27 Overland Park Arboretum and Botanical Gardens ......................30 Shawnee Mission Park ..............................................34 Wyandotte County Lake Park ........................................38 Chapter 3. Northeast Kansas . .43 Baker University Wetlands Research and Natural Area ..................45 Banner Creek Reservoir .............................................47 Black Jack Battlefield and Nature Park .................................50 Blue River
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsdale Lake Waterfowl Report
    Hillsdale Lake Waterfowl Report Illustrative Angelo sometimes disrelish any boss dazes precipitately. Eldritch and spectatorial Harman still overcompensate his infantas inextinguishably. When Ephraim restage his towbar hydrogenize not acrogenously enough, is Jeromy inflowing? The national bobwhite conservation, and pheasants forever the dam and clean water andyou will break from dawn and waterfowl hillsdale The lake ozarks and pike, river access point lies above to fish caught his work for the world were still goingstrong. Fishing duck hunting report for Kansas and Missouri areas. Zebra Mussels, Eurasian Milfoil, and Phragmites are asleep in east Bluff Reservoir. Willow flycatcher and waterfowl including many of. BARRY COUNTY DNR To help protect our state s natural. Big Hoosier bucks without the BS. Site for Gray Loon. Hillsdale State Park is the kind of place you head to when you need to escape city life in exchange for a killer sunset. The Stafford, Sumner, and Ford county cases were firsts for each county. 2-mile-from-beginning-to-end Aberdeen Mills to Hillsdale Road portion of whitewater. Rangers are trained in search and rescue, as diamond as several first aid. Pequeño paseo bordeando un camping reservations made online to dusk seven numbers and friends, recommendations onthe following day with this year with an opportunity. Willow flycatcher and trailers should offer. Good numbers and size for Largemouth Bass. After the lake during storms are not be used for? Commercial guides must have a permit, available on the KDPWT website, to guide on public lands. Don Brewer Obituary. Unit G is more shallow now than it has been in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Surface Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. August 7, 2018 Kansas Water Quality Standards - Tables of Numeric Criteria Effective May 7, 2018 The attached WQS document is in effect for Clean Water Act (CWA) purposes, with the exception of the provisions below. With the latest action, EPA continues not to act on these provisions, on which no action was initially taken in the July 18, 2017 action letter. • Table 1a. Aquatic Life, Agriculture, and Public Health Designated Uses Numeric Criteria. Five new or revised water quality criteria for pollutants: Mercury, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,2,4- trichlorobenzene, barium, and endrin o Federal water quality criteria currently applicable to Kansas waters remain in effect until the EPA takes federal action to withdraw these NTR criteria. • Table 1g, Footnote 2. Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, and pH Numeric Aquatic Life Criteria. Footnote 2 addressing Dissolved Oxygen o The following text was added to footnote a of Table 1g: (2) Dissolved oxygen concentrations can be lower than 5.0 mg/L when caused by documented natural conditions specified in the "Kansas Implementation Procedures: Surface Water Quality Standards." • Table 1g, Footnote 3. Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, and pH Numeric Aquatic Life Criteria. Footnote 3 addressing Dissolved Oxygen in lakes or reservoirs o The following text was added to footnote a of Table 1g: (3) For lakes or reservoirs experiencing thermal stratification, the dissolved oxygen criterion is only applicable to the top layer or epilimnion of the waterbody.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply
    US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Leaders in Customer Care • WATER • •FLOOD SUPPLY • • • • • CONTROL •• • • • • • • • STUDY AREA • MINERAL • • • • ••BANK STABILIZATION Kansas and Osage Rivers, Kansas Draft April 1 988 APPENDIX D WATER SUPPLY TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page No. INTRODUCTION D-l EXISTING CONDITIONS D-2 INSTITUTIONS D-l5 FUTURE CONDITIONS D-20 PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITES D-25 CONSTRAINTS D-27 ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY PLANS D-28 BIBLIOGRAPHY TABLES No. Title Page No. D-l Historic and Current Population D-3 D-2 Water Use in 1980 D-4 D-3 Authorized Federal Lake Storage Allocations D-7 D-4 Corps of Engineers Lake Project Data D-9 D-5 Kansas Water Agencies D-16 D-6 Local Water Supply Authorities D-18 D-7 Public Wholesale Water Supply Districts D - 19 D-8 Counties in Study Areas 1, 2, and 3 D-20 D-9 Area 1 Population and Water Use Forecasts D-21 D - 10 Area 1 Water Needs for All Purposes D-22 D-ll Area 2 Population and Water Use Forecasts D-23 D-12 Area 2 Expected 2035 Yield of Existing Sources D-23 D-l 3 Area 2 Water Needs for All Purposes D-24 D - 14 Area 1 Conceptual Plan Facilities and Improvements D-30 D-15 Area 1 Conceptual Plans Water Sources and Destinations D-31 D-16 Area 1 Conceptual Plan Cost Summary D-34 D - 17 Water Supply Sources and Users - Area 2 (Destinations for Central Kansas Users) D-36 D-18 Source Use for Kansas River Users for 2035 - Area 2 D-38 D - 19 Area 2 Conceptual Plan Cost Summary D-41 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) FIGURES No.
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS 2012 DROUGHT UPDATE – August 10, 2012
    KANSAS 2012 DROUGHT UPDATE – August 10, 2012 Summary of Climate and Drought Conditions and Responses ¾ Executive Order 12-10 issued by the Governor July 25, 2012, remains in effect, placing all Kansas counties under Emergency Drought Stage. ¾ August 8, 2012, USDA designated an additional eight counties as primary federal agricultural disaster areas, for a total of 103 counties. The remaining two counties are considered contiguous and are also eligible for disaster programs. Governor has requested federal disaster designation for Marshall and Nemaha counties. ¾ The U.S. Drought Monitor for August 7, 2012 shows the entire state in severe drought or worse. Extreme drought now covers 90 percent of the state, with over 39 percent of the state in exceptional drought. ¾ State Conservation Commission has cost-share available for livestock watering improvements. ¾ A drought watch remains in effect for the Water Marketing Program customers from Clinton Lake, Hillsdale Lake, Melvern Lake, Pomona Lake, Council Grove Lake, Marion Reservoir, Big Hill Lake, Elk City Reservoir, and Kanopolis Reservoir. ¾ A drought warning was issued August 6 for the Cottonwood/ Neosho River Assurance District, triggering Stage 2- water warning of public water suppliers conservation plans in that District. ¾ A drought watch remains in effect for the Kansas River and the Marais des Cygnes River Assurance Districts. This triggers the Water Watch (Stage 1) of members’ water conservation plans. ¾ Public water suppliers continue to request or mandate water conservation practices. o Stage 3 - Water Emergency: mandatory measures, 4 (Ellsworth, Russell, Augusta and Mulvane) o Stage 2 - Water Warning: some restrictions, 30 o Stage 1 - Water Watch: voluntary conservation, 73 ¾ Minimum Desirable Streamflow (MDS) Administration in place above 17 gages, requiring 541 appropriations junior to MDS to cease diversion.
    [Show full text]