DOCSLIB.ORG

The Cost of Replacing Today's Army Aviation Fleet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Cost of Replacing Today's Army Aviation Fleet CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE The Cost of Replacing Today’s Army Aviation Fleet MAY 2019 Notes The years referred to in this report are federal fiscal years, which run from October 1 to September 30 and are designated by the calendar year in which they end. All costs are expressed in 2018 dollars. For the years before 2018, costs are adjusted for inflation with the gross domestic product price index from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Costs for years after 2018 are adjusted for inflation with the Congressional Budget Office’s projection of that index. On the cover: The drawing depicts, from top to bottom, an H-47 Chinook, an H-60 Black Hawk, and an AH-64 Apache. www.cbo.gov/publication/55180 Contents Summary 1 The Cost of Replacing Today’s Fleet 1 How CBO Made Its Projections 4 Future Vertical Lift Aircraft 5 Projected Procurement Schedules and Costs 6 Age of Fleets 6 Uncertainties 6 Uncertainty About the Future Vertical Lift Program 7 Uncertainty About Chinook Modernization 8 Appendix: Composition of the Army’s Current Fleet and CBO’s Estimate of Replacement Costs 11 List of Tables and Figures 15 About This Document 16 The Cost of Replacing Today’s Army Aviation Fleet Summary Aircraft (FARA) for improved armed reconnaissance The U.S. Army has about 4,300 piloted aircraft, most capabilities. The FLRAA is expected to replace of which are helicopters (also known as rotary-wing today’s Black Hawk helicopters, and the FARA may aircraft). Three large, high-value fleets—the H-60 Black eventually replace today’s Apaches when they are Hawks, AH-64 Apaches, and H-47 Chinooks—account retired. for most of the helicopters, and their eventual replace- ment dominates the Army’s future procurement costs. In • Uncertainty. CBO’s estimates are subject to several this report, the Congressional Budget Office estimates sources of uncertainty. The characteristics of the two the costs of replacing those helicopters and the Army’s FVL aircraft have not been finalized, and technical other aircraft through 2050 if the service implemented challenges could change schedules, characteristics, or its current plans and, for aircraft with no announced costs. Additionally, the Army has recently indicated replacement plans, if they were replaced when they that it may substantially change or cancel plans to reached the end of their typical service life.1 modernize the CH-47F Chinook helicopters that are included in CBO’s projection. • Replacement Costs. CBO projects that the annual cost of replacing the aircraft in the Army’s current The Cost of Replacing Today’s Fleet fleet would decline during the 2020s, from about According to data the Army provided to CBO, as of $4 billion in 2018 to about $1.5 billion in 2027. April 15, 2018, the Army’s aviation fleet consisted of It would then rise to a peak of about $4.7 billion 21 different types of aircraft, including the following: in 2032 before drifting downward between 2035 and 2045. Because the Army made considerable • 2,279 Sikorsky H-60 Black Hawk helicopters, most investments in aircraft between 2007 and 2016, of which are utility transports; relatively few aircraft are near the end of their service life, reducing the number of aircraft to be replaced • 744 Boeing AH-64 Apache heavy attack helicopters, during the 2020s. which are also used for armed reconnaissance missions; • Methods. CBO’s projections are based on publicly articulated procurement plans for some aircraft • 423 Boeing H-47 Chinook heavy-lift cargo and, for aircraft without such plans, on their typical helicopters; retirement age; the projections do not take into account the costs of development, operations and • 411 Airbus UH-72 Lakota light utility helicopters; maintenance, modifications, or personnel associated and with aircraft. • 92 Beechcraft C-12 Huron fixed-wing passenger • Future Vertical Lift Plans. The Army’s Future Vertical turboprop airplanes (plus an additional Lift (FVL) program is developing new technologies 30 RC-12 reconnaissance airplanes).2 to include in aircraft in the late 2020s to early 2030s: the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) for transport and the Future Attack Reconnaissance 2. The H-60 Black Hawks include EH-60, HH-60, MH-60, and UH-60 helicopters. The H-47 Chinooks include both CH-47 and MH-47 helicopters. For more details on the Army’s force 1. CBO undertook a similar analysis of Air Force aircraft. See structure, see Congressional Budget Office, The U.S. Military’s Congressional Budget Office, The Cost of Replacing Today’s Air Force Structure: A Primer (July 2016), Chapter 2, www.cbo.gov/ Force Fleet (December 2018), www.cbo.gov/publication/54657. publication/51535. 2 THE COST OF REPLACING TODAY’S ARMY AVIATION FLEET MAY 2019 Figure 1 . Age and Replacement Cost of the Army’s Fleet, 2018 Number of Aircraft 1,200 1,000 800 Many of the Army’s aircraft have been acquired or remanufactured 600 within the past 10 years. 400 200 0 0−4 5−9 10−14 15−19 20−24 25−29 30−34 35−39 40−44 45−49 Replacement Cost Billions of 2018 Dollars 50 Those fairly new or recently 40 remanufactured aircraft are in the cohorts with the highest 30 replacement costs. 20 10 0 0−4 5−9 10−14 15−19 20−24 25−29 30−34 35−39 40−44 45−49 Entered service Aircraft Age in 2018 (Years) Entered service in 2018 in 1969 Source: Congressional Budget Office, using data from the U.S. Army. Age is measured in years since acquisition or remanufacture. The figure does not include data for MQ-1C Gray Eagles because ages for those aircraft were not available. Although those aircraft range widely in age, many Army appendix). For example, the December 2017 CH-47F aircraft are fairly new, having been acquired or remanu- Modernized Cargo Helicopter (CH-47F Block II) factured within the past 10 years (see the upper panel in Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) indicated an average Figure 1).3 procurement unit cost of $28 million in 2017 dollars, or about $29 million in 2018 dollars. Assigning each of CBO assigned each type of aircraft in the current the Army’s 423 H-47 Chinooks that average replacement Army fleet an estimated replacement unit cost and cost resulted in an estimated overall fleet-replacement then projected the total replacement cost for each cost of $12.2 billion.4 Not surprisingly, the Army’s aircraft type by multiplying the per-aircraft replace- largest fleets—the H-60 Black Hawks, AH-64 Apaches, ment cost by the number of aircraft in that fleet (see the and H-47 Chinooks—had the highest total replace- ment costs. The aircraft with the highest replacement 3. The Army often remanufactures helicopters, rebuilding the aircraft using the original metallic chassis. The Army assigns new tail numbers to remanufactured helicopters, so they appear in 4. That technique does not imply that Chinook aircraft in the the data CBO analyzed as new aircraft. CBO cannot tell whether current fleet are worth $29 million today. Rather, replacing a given helicopter is new or remanufactured, so aircraft age is today’s (Block I) Chinooks with Block IIs would have an average measured from either acquisition or remanufacture date. procurement unit cost of that amount. MAY 2019 THE COST OF REPLACING TODAY’S ARMY AVIATION FLEET 3 Figure 2 . The Army’s Budgets for Procuring Aircraft, 2000–2018 Billions of 2018 Dollars 9 Average Budget for Procuring Aircraft, 6 2010–2018 The Army’s budgets for procuring Average Budget for Procuring Aircraft, Budget for Procuring Aircraft aircraft increased markedly 2000–2009 starting in 2007. 3 0 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 Source: Congressional Budget Office, using data from the U.S. Army. costs tend to be the newest ones (see the lower panel in aircraft over the 2010–2018 period but similar to the Figure 1). average budget over the 2000–2009 period. The Army’s total annual budget for procuring aircraft The $4.7 billion peak in 2032 is composed of fund- increased markedly starting in 2007 (see Figure 2). ing for the FARA ($1.4 billion), which would initially Measured in 2018 dollars, that budget was $1.9 billion augment the Army’s current armed reconnaissance in 2000 but rose to a peak of $8.3 billion in 2011. The capabilities and possibly replace the AH-64 Apache budget declined in most years after 2011, falling to later; the FLRAA ($1.3 billion), which would replace $4.1 billion in 2018. Aircraft procurement represented the H-60 Black Hawk; projected replacement of the about 15 percent of the Army’s total procurement budget fixed-wing MQ-1C Gray Eagle ($1.0 billion); and over the 2000–2018 period; ground vehicles such as modernization of the CH-47 Chinook ($0.7 billion) tanks and trucks accounted for the largest portion of the (see Figure 4).5 Apache procurement would end in 2025 Army’s total procurement budget over that period. The before FARA procurement began in 2028, but procure- procurement budget for aircraft has generally been less ment of Black Hawks (ending in 2035) and FLRAAs than 3 percent of the Army’s overall budget, much of (beginning in 2030) would overlap. which goes to military and civilian personnel costs. Although CBO’s projections address changes in the CBO projects that the costs of replacing the aircraft in Army’s fleet through 2050, the agency formed no the Army’s current fleet would decline in most years judgment about whether the aircraft procurements in its through the 2020s, dropping to about $1.5 billion in analysis are necessary or appropriate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Future Battlefield Rotorcraft Capability (FBRC) – Anno 2035 and Beyond
    November 2018 Future Battle eld Rotorcraft Capability Anno 2035 and Beyond Joint Air Power Competence Centre Cover picture © Airbus © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This document is a product of the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis and food for thought regarding possible ways ahead on this subject. Comments and queries on this document should be directed to the Air Operations Support Branch, JAPCC, von-Seydlitz-Kaserne, Römerstraße 140, D-47546 Kalkar. Please visit our website www.japcc.org for the latest information on JAPCC, or e-mail us at [email protected]. Author Cdr Maurizio Modesto (ITA Navy) Release This paper is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von-Seydlitz-Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated JAPCC |Future BattlefieldRotorcraft Capability and – AnnoBeyond 2035 | November 2018 Executive Director, JAPCC Director, Executive DEUAF General, Lieutenant Klaus Habersetzer port Branchviae-mail [email protected]. AirOperationsSup contact to theJAPCC’s free feel thisdocument.Please to withregard have you may comments welcome any We thisstudy.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support, As a Basis for Conducting CAS
    Joint Publication 3-09.3 Close Air Support 08 July 2009 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for planning and executing close air support. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, and subordinate components of these commands, and the Services. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Vantage Points Perspectives on Airpower and the Profession of Arms
    00-Frontmatter 3x5 book.indd 4 8/9/07 2:39:03 PM Vantage Points Perspectives on Airpower and the Profession of Arms Compiled by CHARLES M. WESTENHOFF Colonel, USAF, Retired MICHAEL D. DAVIS, PHD Colonel, USAF DANIEL MORTENSEN, PHD JOHN L. CONWAY III Colonel, USAF, Retired Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2007 00-Frontmatter 3x5 book.indd 1 8/9/07 2:39:02 PM Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Cataloging Data Vantage points : perspectives on airpower and the profes- sion of arms / compiled by Charles M. Westenhoff . [et al.] p. ; cm. ISBN 978-1-58566-165-7 1. Air power—Quotations, maxims, etc. 2. Air warfare— Quotations, maxims, etc. 3. Military art and science— Quotations, maxims, etc. I. Westenhoff, Charles M. 355.4—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or im- plied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. All photographs are courtesy of the US government. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-5962 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii 00-Frontmatter 3x5 book.indd 2 8/9/07 2:39:03 PM Contents Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v THEORY OF WAR . 1 Patriotism . 8 AIR, Space, AND CYBER POWER . 10 DOCTRINE . 21 Education, TRAINING, AND LESSONS LEARNED . 24 Preparedness, SECURITY, AND FORCE PROTECTION . 27 PLANNING . 30 LEADERSHIP AND PROFESSIONALISM . 32 CHARACTER AND LEADERSHIP TRAITS . 35 TECHNOLOGY .
    [Show full text]
  • Future Vertical Lift Gets Closer
    The Sikorsky-Boeing Defiant X (Sikorsky-Boeing image) The Sikorsky-Boeing team has continued flying its SB>1 Defiant JMR demonstrator. According to a FlightGlobal article on Jan. 25, Future Vertical the aircraft had made 31 flights for a total of 26 flight hours since its first flight on March 21, 2019. The team had also logged 135 hours on its Propulsion Systems Testbed in West Palm Beach, Lift Gets Closer Florida. Sikorsky-Boeing plans to return to the US Air Force’s National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC), located at By VFS Staff Moffett Field in Mountain View, California, in March for additional wind tunnel testing of its one-fifth-scale Defiant model. he Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program continues to move forward on multiple fronts for the US Army and US Navy. In January, the Sikorsky-Boeing team unveiled their “Defiant T Initiated by Congressional direction in 2008, FVL is expected X” concept to meet the FLRAA requirements as stated in the to set the capabilities for the rotary-wing fleet of the United States RFP, leveraging their Defiant JMR demonstrator — which was (and its allies) for the rest of the 21st century. More information based on the Army’s 2013 model performance specification. and links to past articles from each issue of Vertiflite can be found Though not specifically stated, the Defiant X is believed to be at www.vtol.org/FVL. slightly larger than the JMR demonstrator to meet the FLRAA range and payload requirements, and to have growth capability US Army’s FLRAA & FARA for future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • HELP from ABOVE Air Force Close Air
    HELP FROM ABOVE Air Force Close Air Support of the Army 1946–1973 John Schlight AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM Washington, D. C. 2003 i Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schlight, John. Help from above : Air Force close air support of the Army 1946-1973 / John Schlight. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Close air support--History--20th century. 2. United States. Air Force--History--20th century. 3. United States. Army--Aviation--History--20th century. I. Title. UG703.S35 2003 358.4'142--dc22 2003020365 ii Foreword The issue of close air support by the United States Air Force in sup- port of, primarily, the United States Army has been fractious for years. Air commanders have clashed continually with ground leaders over the proper use of aircraft in the support of ground operations. This is perhaps not surprising given the very different outlooks of the two services on what constitutes prop- er air support. Often this has turned into a competition between the two serv- ices for resources to execute and control close air support operations. Although such differences extend well back to the initial use of the airplane as a military weapon, in this book the author looks at the period 1946- 1973, a period in which technological advances in the form of jet aircraft, weapons, communications, and other electronic equipment played significant roles. Doctrine, too, evolved and this very important subject is discussed in detail. Close air support remains a critical mission today and the lessons of yesterday should not be ignored. This book makes a notable contribution in seeing that it is not ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology Student Edition
    $14.95 JULY 27-AUGUST 16, 2020 FLIGHT PATHS FORWARD CLIMBING OUT OF COVID-19 CEO Interviews Airbus, Boeing and L3Harris U.S. Army’s FVL Plan A Heavy Lift for Industry Pandemic Tests Aviation Week Smallsat Industry Workforce Initiative Supported by: The Wings Club Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranger Handbook
    SH 21-76 UNITED STATES ARMY RANGER HANDBOOK "NOT FOR THE WEAK OR FAINTHEARTED” RANGER TRAINING BRIGADE UNITED STATES ARMY INFANTRY SCHOOL FORT BENNING, GEORGIA APRIL 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I RANGER CREED II STANDING ORDERS ROGER’S RANGERS III RANGER HISTORY IV RANGER TRAINING BRIGADE HISTORY CHAPTER 1 – LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLES OF LEADERSHIP 1-1 DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES 1-2 ASSUMPTION OF COMMAND 1-7 CHAPTER 2 – OPERATIONS TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES 2-1 COMBAT INTELLIGENCE 2-7 WARNING ORDER 2-8 OPERATIONS ORDER 2-11 FRAGMENTARY ORDER 2-17 ANNEXES 2-22 COORDINATION CHECKLISTS 2-29 DOCTRINAL TERMS 2-34 CHAPTER 3 – FIRE SUPPORT CAPABILITIES 3-2 CLOSE AIR SUPPORT 3-4 CALL FOR FIRE 3-5 CHAPTER 4 – MOVEMENT TECHNIQUES 4-2 TACTICAL MARCHES 4-6 DANGER AREAS 4-9 CHAPTER 5 – PATROLLING PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 5-1 RECONNAISSANCE OPERATIONS 5-6 COMBAT PATROLS 5-13 AMBUSH 5-14 RAID 5-16 DEPARTURE/RE-ENTRY 5-25 LINK-UP 5-27 PATROL BASE 5-30 MOVEMENT TO CONTACT 5-34 CHAPTER 6 – BATTLE DRILLS PLATOON ATTACK 6-1 SQUAD ATTACK 6-5 REACT TO CONTACT 6-8 BREAK CONTACT 6-9 REACT TO AMBUSH 6-11 KNOCK OUT BUNKERS 6-12 ENTER/CLEAR A TRENCH 6-14 BREACH 6-19 CHAPTER 7 – COMMUNICATIONS AN/PRC-119 7-1 AN/PRC-126 7-3 CHAPTER 8 – ARMY AVIATION AIR ASSAULT 8-1 AIR ASSAULT FORMATIONS 8-3 PZ OPERATIONS 8-5 SAFETY 8-8 CHAPTER 9 – WATERBORNE OPERATIONS ONE ROPE BRIDGE 9-1 BOAT POSITIONS 9-8 EMBARKING/DEBARKING 9-11 LANDING SITE 9-11 RIVER MOVEMENT 9-13 FORMATIONS 9-14 CHAPTER 10 – MILITARY MOUNTAINEERING SPECIAL EQUIPMENT 10-1 KNOTS 10-2 BELAYS 10-8 TIGHTENING SYSTEMS 10-10 ROCK
    [Show full text]
  • Future Vertical Lift Takes Off
    National Aeronautics Museum of Argentina Future Vertical Lift Takes Off The Sikorsky-Boeing SB>1 Defiant made its first flight on March 21. (Sikorsky-Boeing photo) With FARA underway, the Defiant taking flight, the release of the Pentagon’s FVL budget and a request for information for joint-service FLRAA missions, FVL is accelerating to full speed. By Alan Graham he Sikorsky-Boeing SB>1 Defiant high-speed compound Congress added $75M to the fiscal 2019 budget to kick off the helicopter demonstrator flew for the first time on March FARA program. It also added $20M for the JMR program (as a result T21, just days before the US Army released a request for of lobbying by VFS), a portion of which will be used to expand information (referred to here as a “Sources Sought Notice”) on the flight envelopes of the two demonstrators. The Army expects the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA). shortly to put the teams under contract for the additional flying. Originally expected by the end of 2017 but delayed by Meanwhile, the Army has added just over $10M to its fiscal 2020 manufacturing challenges and ground-test glitches, the Defiant’s budget request to accelerate FLRAA. Because it is a joint program, 30-minute first flight also came just weeks after the Army released the service will have to seek approval from the Office of the its fiscal 2020 budget request that seeks increased funding for Secretary of Defense to accelerate the program schedule. the medium-utility FLRAA and the armed-scout Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Affordability of the Army's Future Vertical Lift Portfolio
    NOVEMBER 2019 Assessing the Affordability of the Army’s Future Vertical Lift Portfolio AUTHORS Rhys McCormick Gregory Sanders Andrew P. Hunter A Report of the CSIS DEFENSE-INDUSTRIAL INITIATIVES GROUP DEFENSE-INDUSTRIAL INITIATIVES GROUP November 2019 Assessing the Affordability of the Army’s Future Vertical Lift Portfolio AUTHORS Rhys McCormick Gregory Sanders Andrew P. Hunter A Report of the CSIS DEFENSE-INDUSTRIAL INITIATIVES GROUP About CSIS Established in Washington, D.C., over 50 years ago, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is a bipartisan, nonprofit policy research organization dedicated to providing strategic in sights and policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. In late 2015, Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees. Mr. Pritzker succeeded former U.S. senator Sam Nunn (D-GA), who chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees from 1999 to 2015. CSIS is led by John J. Hamre, who has served as president and chief executive officer since 2000. Founded in 1962 by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS is one of the world’s preeminent international policy in stitutions focused on defense and security; regional study; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and trade to global development and economic integration. For eight consecutive years, CSIS has been named the world’s number one think tank for defense and national security by the University of Pennsylvania’s “Go To Think Tank Index.” The Center’s over 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated schol- ars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look to Assessing the Affordability of Army’s Future Vertical Lift Portfolio the future and anticipate change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of American Airpower in World War I Commemorating the 100Th Anniversary of the US Entry Into the “Great War” Dr
    The Birth of American Airpower in World War I Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the US Entry into the “Great War” Dr. Bert Frandsen* Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, the Air and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. lthough the Wright Brothers invented the airplane, the birth of American air- power did not take place until the United States entered the First World War. When Congress declared war on 6 April 1917, the American air arm was Anothing more than a small branch of the Signal Corps, and it was far behind the air forces of the warring European nations. The “Great War,” then in its third year, had *Portions of this article have been previously published by the author who has written extensively on American airpower in World War I. The article, in whole, has not been previously published. 60 | Air & Space Power Journal The Birth of American Airpower in World War I nothing more than a small branch of the Signal Corps, and it was far behind the air forces of the warring European nations. The “Great War,” then in its third year, had witnessed the development of large air services with specialized aircraft for the missions of observation, bombardment, and pursuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia
    Department of the Army Pamphlet 670–1 Uniform and Insignia Guide to the Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 31 March 2014 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY DA PAM 670–1 Guide to the Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia This administrative revision, dated 10 April 2014- o Makes administrative changes (paras 13-14e and f, 14-15e and f, 21-12b(4), and 22-16b(4)). o Updates paragraph references and figures (paras 22-17d(6), (7), (8), (10), and (14) and figs 14-13, 21-55, 22-56, and 22-63). This new pamphlet, dated 31 March 2014- o Provides the implementation procedures for wear and appearance of Army uniforms and insignia (throughout). Headquarters Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 670–1 Washington, DC 31 March 2014 Uniform and Insignia Guide to the Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia Applicability. This pamphlet applies to t o t h e p o l i c y p r o p o n e n t . R e f e r t o A R t h e A c t i v e A r m y , t h e A r m y N a t i o n a l 25–30 for specific guidance. Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and the U.S. Army Reserve, unless Suggested improvements. Users are otherwise stated. invited to send comments and suggested improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recom- Proponent and exception authority. m e n d e d C h a n g e s t o P u b l i c a t i o n s a n d T h e p r o p o n e n t o f t h i s p a m p h l e t i s t h e Deputy Chief of Staff, G–1.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Decides on FARA and FLRAA the US Army’S Downselections in March Narrow the Field and Advances Its Two FVL Programs
    Army Decides on FARA and FLRAA The US Army’s downselections in March narrow the field and advances its two FVL programs. By Mike Hirschberg, VFS Executive Director Bell V-280 Valor in Arlington, Texas. (VFS) n March 16, the US Army announced that it had awarded Competitive Demonstration and Risk Reduction (CDRR) The company repeated the demonstration on Jan. 10 for the agreements to Bell and Sikorsky-Boeing for its Future Long media and this time also with Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy; O Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas), the ranking member of the powerful Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) program. Nine days later, on March 25, the Army selected Bell and Sikorsky to continue into phase two of House Appropriations Committee (HAC); Maj. Gen. Thomas Todd, the Future Attack and Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) Competitive the Army’s then-Program Executive Officer (PEO) for Aviation; Prototype (CP) program. Both programs are part of the broader US and Brig. Gen. Walter Rugen, director of the FVL cross-functional Department of Defence (DoD) Future Vertical Lift (FVL) effort. team. By March, the aircraft had completed some 170 hours of flight testing. FLRAA The seeds for a comprehensive initiative to replace DoD-wide The Sikorsky-Boeing team held a similar media-government legacy helicopters with next-generation rotorcraft were planted demonstration the next month, on Feb. 20, at Sikorsky’s (partly at the behest of VFS) in January 2008 when the US Development Flight Center (DFC) in West Palm Beach, Florida. Congress directed the Pentagon to initiate an FVL Capabilities Senior government leaders included Army Secretary McCarthy; Based Assessment (see www.vtol.org/FVL for past Vertiflite Sen.
    [Show full text]