DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Mineral Resource Appraisal of the Richfield 1 °X2° Quadrangle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Mineral Resource Appraisal of the Richfield 1 °X2° Quadrangle U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 916 Summary Mineral Resource Appraisal of the Richfield 1°X2° Quadrangle, West-Central Utah Summary Mineral Resource Appraisal of the Richfield 1°X2° Quadrangle, West-Cen.tral Utah By Thomas A. Steven and Hal T. Morris U.S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 916 Department of the Interior DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Dallas L. Peck, Director Free on application to the Branch af Distribution, Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract . 1 Mineral Resources-Continued Introduction . 1 Epigenetic mineral Resources-Continued CUSMAP participants . 3 Mineralized areas associated with early Miocene Geology . 3 Mount Belknap Volcanics . 20 Geochemistry . 3 Miocene mineral deposits in the Mineral Moun- Geophysics . 3 tains . 21 Remote sensing . 3 Mineralized areas associated with middle Mio- Water resource studies . 4 cene Steamboat Mountain Formation . 22 CUSMAP products . 4 Mineralized areas associated with the middle Geology and ore deposits . 10 Miocene rhyolite of Gillies Hill . 22 Mineral resources . 11 Mineralized areas associated with late Miocene Syngenetic and diagenetic mineral resources . 11 silicic rocks in Kingston Canyon . 22 Epigenetic mineral resources . 16 Mineralized areas associated with Pliocene and Mineralized areas associated with Oligocene younger silicic rocks . 22 and early Miocene calc-alkalic rocks . 16 Mineralized areas near Cove Fort and Sulphur- Mineralized areas associated with early Miocene dale . 23 Blawn Formation . 19 Uranium in basin fills . 23 Unclassified mineral deposits . 23 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Index map of Utah showing location of Richfield 1 °X2° quadrangle . 1 2. Map showing major geographic features of the Richfield 1 °X2° quadrangle, Utah. Numbered circles indicate localities discussed in text and shown on figures 3 and 4 . 2 3. Map showing generalized geology and different geologic associations related to volcanogenic-hydrothermal mineralization in the Richfield 1 °X2° quadrangle, Utah . 12 4. Map showing mineral resource potential for volcanogenic-hydrothermal mineral deposits in the Richfield 1 oX 2 o quadrangle, Utah . 14 III SUMMARY MINERAL RESOURCE APPRAISAL OF THE RICHFIELD 1 ° x 2 ° QUADRANGLE. WEST -CENTRAL UTAH By Thomas A. Steven and Hal T. Morris ABSTRACT Each of the many identified centers of mineralization is discussed briefly in this report and an estimate made of its The mineral resource potential of the Richfield 1 °X2° resource potential. quadrangle, Utah, has been appraised using geological, geophysical, geochemical, and remote-sensing techniques. These studies have led to many publications giving basic data and interpretations; of these, a series of 18 maps at 1:250,000 and INTRODUCTION 1:500,000 scales summarizing aspects of the geology, geophysics, geochemistry, and remote sensing is designated the The Richfield 1 oX 2 o quadrangle in west-central CUSMAP (Conterminous United States Mineral Appraisal Pro­ Utah (figs. 1 and 2) has been studied as part of the gram) folio. This circular uses the data shown on these maps U.S. Geological Survey CUS111AP (Conterminous to appraise the mineral resource potential of the quadrangle. The oldest rocks exposed in the Richfield quadrangle are small United States Mineral Appraisal Program) pro­ patches of Early Proterozoic (1.7 billion years old) gneiss and gram in which multidisciplinary studies are used schist on the west side of the Mineral Mountains. These rocks to evaluate the mineral resource potential of presumably formed the basement on which many thousands selected quadrangles throughout the nation. This of meters of Late Proterozoic, Paleozoic, and lower Mesozoic CUSMAP appraisal of the Richfield quadrangle is sedimentary strata were deposited. These rocks were deformed during the Late Cretaceous Sevier orogeny when Precambrian limited to metallic and nonmetallic resources; coal, and Paleozoic strata in the western part of the quadrangle were oil and gas, and geothermal energy resources are thrust relatively eastward across Paleozoic and Mesozoic strata not considered. The Richfield quadrangle was in the eastern part of the quadrangle. Late Cretaceous and early chosen for study because. preliminary data in­ Tertiary highlands above the overthrust belt were eroded and dicated that parts of the area have high mineral much of the debris was deposited in broad basins east of the belt. Volcanism in Oligocene and earliest Miocene time formed resource potential, and because modern geologic an east·northeast-trending belt of calcalkalic volcanoes across studies, focusing in part on mineral resources, had the southern half of the quadrangle. In early Miocene time, the already been begun in several places. By expand­ composition of the volcanic rocks changed to a bimodal ing and integrating these local studies, and by assemblage of mafic rocks and high-silica alkali rhyolite that has been erupted episodically ever since. Syngenetic mineral resources developed during formation of both sedimentary and volcanic rocks. These include limestone and dolomite, silica-rich sandstone, metalliferous black shale, evaporite deposits, zeolite deposits, pumice, cinders and scoria, and evaporitic or diagenetic deposits in playa environments. Most of these deposits need to have markets established, or extraction and fabrication techniques developed, for them to be utilized. Most epigenetic deposits are of volcanogenic-hydrothermal origin. Deposits associated with calc-alkalic igneous activity I largely contain Cu, Ph, Zn, Au, and Ag, and occur in a variety UTAH I of types zoned around core intrusions. Younger deposits are I mostly associated with silicic igneous centers belonging to the I o Richfield bimodal mafic-silicic igneous association. Resources associated Richfield I with this latter group are likely to contain one or more of the quadrangle I I elements Mo, W, U, Sn, Be, and F, as well as Ph, Zn, Au, and I Ag. Alunite and kaolinite deposits are found at many mineral­ ized centers. Most epigenetically mineralized areas expose on­ I I ly the upper, near-surface parts of the different hydrothermal ______ _JI systems; most of whatever mineral deposits formed in these systems probably still exist at depth, awaiting discovery. Our conclusion is that many mineralized areas have excellent FIGURE I.-Index map of Utah showing possibilities for the occurrence of mineral resources. location of Richfield 1 oX 2 o quadrangle. 1 --,112°00' Sevier Desert rf ~~· ~,<::< 9-o<' ~ k!S ~IIi <:P<:> q_'~~ -® @ I .. G ® !e ~ .s J! ~ c: ~ 5: ~ @~ "' ~ ~cysvale ~ • Milford 8 ®~ @ ( :- ·$' ~ .... ~ $ <lj ) @I@ •::r @ ~ •::r 8 r@ "'~ @ lif <::>"'"' ®l ( \.@ i .} ~.. ~ ""' @ X-"'" J -o-;.­t 'i \1! '<O"i ~~ 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 KILOMETERS I I I I I I I I FIGURE 2.-Map showing major geographic features of the Richfield 1 °X2° quadrangle, Utah, Numbered circles indicate localities discussed in text and shown on figures 3 and 4, bringing to bear other earth science disciplines, it geochemistry, and geophysics of the area. The ma­ has been possible to identify many areas favorable jor participants and their main fields of study are for the occurrence of mineral resources. In addi­ listed as follows: tion, basic geological, geophysical, and geochem­ ical parameters of important segments of the intersecting Cordilleran overthrust belt and GEOLOGY younger Pioche-Marysvale igneous and mineral belt have been determined. T. A. Steven (U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado) (Coor­ Many of the preliminary results of this study or dinator of CUSMAP studies), Geology of igneous rocks and of directly contributory precursor studies, as well economic geology in eastern half of quadrangle. Co-compiler as much of the basic data, have been published or of geologic map. released in open file as the studies progressed. This H. T. Morris (U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California), report is a brief summary designed to present the Geology of sedimentary rocks, and economic geology of the western half of quadrangle. Co-compiler of geologic map. general conclusions reached by the CUSMAP C. G. Cunningham (U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia), studies with respect to the mineral resource poten­ Geology and economic geology of the Tushar Mountains tial of the Richfield quadrangle. To maintain brev­ and adjacent areas. ity and present these conclusions without undue P. D. Rowley, (U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado) interruption in the narrative account, many of the Geology of the Sevier Plateau, Black Mountains, and ad­ jacent areas. supporting data and source references have been J. J. Anderson (Kent State Univ., Kent, Ohio, and U.S. Geo­ deliberately omitted. Those interested in such data logical Survey), Geology of the southern Tushar Mountains and sources should consult appropriate individual and Markagunt Plateau. references listed in the section entitled "CUSMAP M. N. Machette, (U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado), products" or the more comprehensive and well­ Geology of the Beaver basin. D. L. Nielson and B.S. Sibbett, (Univ. Utah Research Inst., documented summary by Steven and Morris Salt Lake City, Utah; not formally part of CUSMAP pro­ (1984, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report gram), Geology of the Mineral Mountains and adjacent 84-521). areas. The general level of erosion in the Richfield L. F. Hintze (Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah, and U.S. quadrangle is sufficiently shallow that only the Geological Survey),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of Beaver County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley The settlement of Beaver County began in February 1856 when fifteen families from Parowan moved by wagon thirty miles north to Beaver Valley. The county was created by the Utah legislature on 31 January 1856, a week before the Parowan group set out to make their new home. However, centuries before, prehistoric peoples lived in the area, obtaining obsidian for arrow and spear points from the Mineral Mountains. Later, the area became home to Paiute Indians. Franciscan Friars Dominguez and Escalante passed through the area in October 1776. The Mormon settlement of Beaver devel­ oped at the foot of the Tushar Mountains. In 1859 the community of Minersville was es­ tablished, and residents farmed, raised live­ stock, and mined the lead deposits there. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the Mineral Mountains and other locations in the county saw extensive mining develop­ ment, particularly in the towns of Frisco and Newhouse. Mining activities were given a boost with the completion of the Utah South­ ern Railroad to Milford in 1880. The birth­ place of both famous western outlaw Butch Cassidy and inventor of television Philo T. Farnsworth, Beaver County is rich in history, historic buildings, and mineral treasures. ISBN: 0-913738-17-4 A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County A HISTORY OF Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Beaver County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Beaver County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-17-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61325 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 Beaver County: The Places That Shape Us .
    [Show full text]
  • BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GEOLOGY STUDIES Volume 42, Part 11, 1997
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GEOJ (3GY GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1997 ANNUAL MEETING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PART2 TWO EDITED BY PAUL KARL LINK AND BART J. KOWALLIS VOLUME 42 1997 MESOZOIC TO RECENT GEOLOGY OF UTAH Edited by Paul Karl Link and Bart J. Kowallis BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GEOLOGY STUDIES Volume 42, Part 11, 1997 CONTENTS Triassic and Jurassic Macroinvertebrate Faunas of Utah: Field Relationships and Paleobiologic Significance ........................................ Carol M. Tang and David J. Bottjer Part 2: Trace fossils, hardgrounds and ostreoliths in the Carmel Formation (Middle Jurassic) of southwestern Utah ...........................................Mark A. Wilson Part 3: Low-diversity faunas of the Middle Jurassic Carmel Formation and their paleobiological implications ................................Carol M. Tang and David J. Bottjer Part 4: Paleoecology of Lower Triassic marine carbonates in the southwestern USA ....................... ......................................................David J. Bottjer and Jennifer K. Schubert Structure and Kinematics of a Complex Impact Crater, Upheaval Dome, Southeast Utah .........................Bryan J. Kriens, Eugene M. Shoemaker, and Ken E. Herkenhoff Stratigraphy, and structure of the Sevier thrust belt, and proximal foreland-basin system in central Utah: A transect from the Sevier Desert to the Wasatch Plateau ...................T. E Lawton, D. A. Sprinkel, F! G. DeCelles, G. Mitra, A. J. Sussman,, and M. l? Weiss Lower to Middle Cretaceous Dinosaur Faunas of the Central Colorado Plateau: A Key to Understanding 35 Million Years of Tectonics, Sedimentology, Evolution, and Biogeography ..................... James I. Kirkland, Brooks Britt, Donald L. Burge, Ken Carpenter, Richard Cifelli, Frank DeCourten, Jeffrey Eaton, Steve Hasiotis, and Tim Lawton Sequence Architecture, and Stacking Patterns in the Cretaceous Foreland Basin, Utah: Tectonism versus Eustasy ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Milford Solar Phase II Cultural Resources Survey, Beaver County, Utah (Site Location Information Is Protected and Has Been Removed)
    APPENDIX F Cultural Resources Survey Report Milford Solar Phase II Cultural Resources Survey, Beaver County, Utah (Site location information is protected and has been removed) APRIL 2020 PREPARED FOR Beaver County Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants MILFORD SOLAR PHASE II CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY, BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH Prepared for Beaver County Planning and Zoning Commission 105 East Center Street Beaver, Utah 84713 Prepared by Tiffany Tuttle Collins, M.A. and Reilly Jensen, M.A. Principal Investigator Kelly Beck, Ph.D. SWCA Environmental Consultants 257 East 200 South, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 (801) 322-4307 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 42529.02 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No.19-757 Utah State Antiquities Project No. U20ST0252 Public Lands Policy Coordination Office Permit No. 18 April 2020 Milford Solar Phase II Cultural Resources Survey, Beaver County, Utah ABSTRACT Report Title. Milford Solar Phase II Cultural Resources Survey, Beaver County, Utah Report Date. Draft, April 2020 Lead Agency Name. Beaver County Permit and Project Numbers. Utah State Antiquities Project No. U20ST0252; Public Lands Policy Coordination Office Permit No. 18; SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) Project No. 42529.02; SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 19-757 Land Ownership Status. Private, Bureau of Land Management Project Description. In February 2020, Longroad Energy requested that SWCA conduct a Class III cultural resources survey (survey) for the Milford Solar Phase II Project (Project). The Project is for a proposed utility scale solar energy facility located on private lands north and east of Milford in Beaver County. The Project involves the construction of a 250-megawatt photovoltaic solar energy generation facility and associated ancillary facilities, including a substation, battery energy storage system, electrical collection lines, a gen lead transmission line, a switching station, an operations and maintenance building, and new-build access roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground=Water Hydrology and Simulated Effects of Development in the Milford Area, an Arid Basin in Southwestern Utah
    GROUND=WATER HYDROLOGY AND SIMULATED EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE MILFORD AREA, AN ARID BASIN IN SOUTHWESTERN UTAH REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1409-G AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U .S . Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U .S . Geological Survey." Prices of available U .S . Geological Survey publica- tions released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List ." Publications tha` may be listed in various U.S . Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may be no longer available . Order U .S . Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below . BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech- Books and maps of the U .S . Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U .S . Geological Survey Earth of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single Science Information Centers (ESIC's), all of which are authorized copies of Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis- agents of the Superintendent of Documents : cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtain- • ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm . 101, 4230 University Dr. able by mail from • LAKEWOOD, Colorado-Federal Center, Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Tungsten Deposits in Beaver County, Utah
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Bulletin 945-D TUNGSTEN DEPOSITS IN BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH BY S. W. HOBBS Strategic Minerals Investigations, 1944 (Pages 81-111) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1945 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C- Price 65 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................. 81 Introduction............................................. 82 Location, accessibility, and transportation.......... 82 History of the area.................................. 82 Previous work........................................ 83 Field work........................................... 83 Geology.................................................. 84 Topography and regional setting...................... 84 Rocks................................................. 84 Sedimentary rocks................................ 85 Igneous rocks.................................... 85 Structure............................................ 86 Tungsten deposits........................................ 87 Cupric nines Co. tungsten deposit.................... 87 Geology.......................................... 88 Sedimentary rocks............................ 88 Igneous rocks................................ 88 Structure.................................... 88 Contact metamorphlsm......................... 89 Occurrence of scheelite...................... 89 Distribution, grade, and volume
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of the Richfield I°X2° Quadrangle, West
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of the Richfield I°x2° quadrangle, west-central Utah Thomas A. Steven I and Hal T. Morris 2 Open-File Report 84-521 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1Denver, Colo. 2Menlo Park, Calif. Contents Abstract ............................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................. 2 CUSMAP products.......................................................... 2 Outline of geology....................................................... 4 Older Precambrian rocks............................................. 4 Pre-orogenic sedimentary rocks...................................... 4 Sevier orogeny...................................................... 6 Synorogenic and post-orogenie sedimentary rocks..................... 7 Volcanic rocks...................................................... 8 Calc-alkalic igneous rocks..................................... 8 Bimodal igneous rocks of Miocene age........................... 10 Bimodal rocks of Pliocene and Pleistocene age.................. 12 Mineral Mountains batholith......................................... 12 Basin-Range tectonism and sedimentation............................. 13 Surficial deposits.................................................. 14 Mineral resources........................................................ 14 Syngenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Intrusive Rock Database for the Digital Geologic Map of Utah
    Intrusive Rock Database for the Digital Geologic Map of Utah C.J. Nutt1 and Steve Ludington2 Open-File Report 03-486 Version 1.0 2003 U.S. Department of the Interior Gail A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 3U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025 1 Introduction and Background Digital geologic maps offer the promise of rapid and powerful answers to geologic questions using Geographic Information System software (GIS). Using modern GIS and database methods, a specialized derivative map can be easily prepared. An important limitation can be shortcomings in the information provided in the database associated with the digital map, a database which is often based on the legend of the original map. The purpose of this report is to show how the compilation of additional information can, when prepared as a database that can be used with the digital map, be used to create some types of derivative maps that are not possible with the original digital map and database. This Open-file Report consists of computer files with information about intrusive rocks in Utah that can be linked to the Digital Geologic Map of Utah (Hintze et al., 2000), an explanation of how to link the databases and map, and a list of references for the databases. The digital map, which represents the 1:500,000-scale Geologic Map of Utah (Hintze, 1980), can be obtained from the Utah Geological Survey (Map 179DM).
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Jane E. Jenness INTRODUCTION This Map Report Is
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WRI REPORT 83-4122-D MAP SHOWING OUTCROPS OF GRANITIC ROCKS, BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE, UTAH Compiled by Jane E. Jenness INTRODUCTION This map report is one of a series of geologic and hydrologic maps covering all or parts of States within the Basin and Range province of the western United States. Other map reports in this series contain data about ground-water hydrology, ground-water quality, surface distribution of selected rock types, tectonic conditions, areal geophysics, Pleistocene lakes and marshes, and mineral and energy resources. This work is a part of the U.S. Geological Survey's program for geologic and hydrologic evaluation of the province to identify prospective regions for further study relative to isolation of high-level nuclear waste (Bedinger, Sargent, and Reed, 1984). This map report was prepared from published geologic maps and reports utilizing the project guidelines defined in Sargent and Bedinger (1984) . As used in this report, granitic rocks include principally granite, quartz monzonite, and granodiorite, but also minor associated diorite, rhyolite, and latite. In the Description of Map Units, the geologic and radiometric ages, lithologic character, type of intrusive body and relation to enclosing rock units, where known, and sources of data are described for the granitic rocks within outlined and numbered areas in counties within the study area. The radiometric ages of the rock units are only those that are available and do not necessarily represent the entire age range of the units. DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS [To convert feet (ft) to meters, multiply feet by 0.3048] Geologic and County- radiometric age Lithology, References area Map in million of intrusive type, for number symbol years (m.y.) and comments county area BEAVER COUNTY (B) B-l Tg Tertiary Nonresistant, granular dioritic Hintze, 1974b rocks, probably occupying volcanic conduits.
    [Show full text]
  • Cominco American Well: Implications for the Reconstruction of the Sevier Orogen and Basin and Range Extension in West-Central Utah Mark H
    [American Journal of Science, Vol. 312, May, 2012, P. 508–533, DOI 10.2475/05.2012.02] COMINCO AMERICAN WELL: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SEVIER OROGEN AND BASIN AND RANGE EXTENSION IN WEST-CENTRAL UTAH MARK H. ANDERS*,†, NICHOLAS CHRISTIE-BLICK*, and ALBERTO MALINVERNO** ABSTRACT. Re-evaluation of acoustic, gamma ray and dip meter logs from the Cominco American Federal No. 2 well in the Sevier Desert basin of west-central Utah sheds new light on the interpretation of Neoproterozoic and Cambrian stratigraphy and Mesozoic structure in a region that has been influential in the development of ideas about crustal shortening and extension. The most prominent of several major thrust faults (the Canyon Range and Pavant thrusts) have been interpreted by DeCelles and Coogan (2006) [Regional structure and kinematic history of the Sevier fold-and- thrust belt, central Utah: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 118, n. 7-8, p. 841-864, http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B25759.1] as having been cut and in part re- activated between late Oligocene and Holocene time by as much as 47 km of displacement on the gently west-dipping Sevier Desert detachment. This interpreta- tion, which is based upon a combination of outcrop, seismic reflection and well data, depends critically on the Canyon Range thrust intersecting the Cominco well at a depth of 2,551 to 2,557 m (8,370-8,389 ft.), and terminating downwards against a re-activated Pavant thrust. Our work suggests that the fault at 2,551 m (8,370 ft.) is a strand of the Pavant thrust, and that the Canyon Range thrust cuts the well at a depth of 1,222 m (4,010 ft.).
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
    Article Geochemistry 3 Volume 9, Number 5 Geophysics 23 May 2008 Q05019, doi:10.1029/2007GC001886 GeosystemsG G ISSN: 1525-2027 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Click Here for Full Article Lithospheric dismemberment and magmatic processes of the Great Basin–Colorado Plateau transition, Utah, implied from magnetotellurics Philip E. Wannamaker Energy and Geoscience Institute, University of Utah, 423 Wakara Way, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA ([email protected]) Derrick P. Hasterok Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, 717 W. B. Browning Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA ([email protected]) Jeffery M. Johnston Geometrics, Inc., 2190 Fortune Drive, San Jose, California 95131, USA ([email protected]) John A. Stodt Numeric Resources, Inc., 1740 Kensington Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA ([email protected]) Darrell B. Hall and Timothy L. Sodergren Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, 717 W. B. Browning Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) Louise Pellerin Green Engineering Inc., 2215 Curtis Street, Berkeley, California 94702, USA ([email protected]) Virginie Maris Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, 717 W. B. Browning Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA ([email protected]) William M. Doerner SourceOne Geophysical Inc., 10511 Golden Pines Road, Truckee, California 96161, USA ([email protected]) Kim A. Groenewold Department
    [Show full text]
  • GEOTHERMAL BIBLIOGRAPHY of UTAH — 2011 Stephanie Earls and Robert Blackett Utah Geological Survey January 2012
    GEOTHERMAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF UTAH — 2011 Stephanie Earls and Robert Blackett Utah Geological Survey January 2012 INTRODUCTION This document contains bibliographic citations of geothermal‐related information for Utah representing publications released through 2010. The bibliography supports the American Association of State Geologists’ initiative to build the National Geothermal Data System. A separate, digital version of this bibliography, available on‐line through the National Geothermal Data System (www.stategeothermaldata.org), was created as a searchable index in spreadsheet format with links to other on‐line sources. This bibliography is preceded by the compilation of Budding and Bugden (1986), which was later updated through 2000 by Blackett and Wakefield (2002). The citations listed here were extracted from Budding and Bugden (1986), Blackett and Wakefield (2002), and the following sources: • WorldCat • GeoRef • Utah State Library • Google/Google Scholar • Utah Geological Survey Geology Bibliography of Utah • U.S. DOE Energy Database • OSTI Geothermal Technologies Legacy Collection • Annotated & Indexed Bibliography of Geothermal Phenomenon • University of Utah publications • Brigham Young University publications • Utah State University publications • U.S. Geological Survey publications • Utah Geological Survey publications • Graduate theses/dissertations • Geothermal Resources Council publications • Geothermal Energy Association • International Geothermal Association • Stanford University Geothermal Program • Southern Methodist
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Mineral Potential of Public Lands Located Within Proposed Solar Energy Zones in Utah
    Utah SEZ Mineral Assessment Rev. 1 July 2012 CONTENTS NOTATION ........................................................................................................................... vii SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................. ix SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 S.1 Escalante Valley SEZ .......................................................................................... 1 S.2 Milford Flats South SEZ ...................................................................................... 2 S.3 Wah Wah Valley SEZ .......................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................. 5 1.2 Legal Description of the Subject Lands ............................................................ 5 1.3 Methodology and Resources ............................................................................. 6 1.4 Locatable Minerals ............................................................................................ 8 1.5 Strategic and Critical Minerals ......................................................................... 8 2 ESCALANTE VALLEY SEZ ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]