DOCSLIB.ORG

Court of Appeals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Court of Appeals OFFICIALLY SELECTED CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Reporter: SARA R. STRATTON Advance Sheets 2d Series Volume 60, No. 3 Opinions filed in June – July 2021 Cite as 60 Kan. App. 2d Copyright 2021 by Sara R. Stratton, Official Reporter For the use and benefit of the State of Kansas JUDGES AND OFFICERS OF THE KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS CHIEF JUDGE: HON. KAREN ARNOLD-BURGER ………………… Overland Park JUDGES: HON. HENRY W. GREEN JR. ...................................... Leavenworth HON. THOMAS E. MALONE ............................................... Wichita HON. STEPHEN D. HILL ......................................................... Paola HON. MICHAEL B. BUSER ....................................... Overland Park HON. G. GORDON ATCHESON ....................................... Westwood HON. DAVID E. BRUNS ....................................................... Topeka HON. ANTHONY J. POWELL .............................................. Wichita HON. KIM R. SCHROEDER ................................................ Hugoton HON. KATHRYN A. GARDNER ........................................... Topeka HON. SARAH E. WARNER .................................................. Lenexa HON. AMY FELLOWS CLINE………..……………...Valley Center HON. LESLEY ANN ISHERWOOD..……………….........Hutchinson HON. JACY J. HURST....………………............................ Lawrence OFFICERS: Reporter of Decisions .................................... SARA R. STRATTON Clerk ............................................................... DOUGLAS T. SHIMA Judicial Administrator……………...……….STEPHANIE BUNTEN Disciplinary Administrator ........................ STANTON A. HAZLETT (III) KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS TABLE OF CASES 60 Kan. App. 2d No. 3 PAGE City of Wichita v. Trotter .................................................339 In re A.W. ........................................................................296 J.B.B. v. J.L.B. .................................................................310 McLean v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. .........................283 Rodina v. Castaneda.........................................................384 Rowell v. State .................................................................235 State v. Betts ....................................................................269 State v. Foster...................................................................243 State v. Rodriguez ............................................................320 State v. Sheets ..................................................................378 (IV) UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS OF THE COURT OF APPEALS DOCKET DISTRICT DATE OF TITLE NUMBER COURT DECISION DECISION Araujo v. State ..................... 122,860 Reno .................... 07/02/2021 Affirmed Bankes v. Prisoner Review Reversed; Bd. ................................... 123,424 Leavenworth ........ 06/11/2021 remanded with directions Beltz v. State ........................ 122,880 Sedgwick ............. 07/09/2021 Affirmed Boos v. Marks ...................... 122,788 Wyandotte ........... 07/16/2021 Affirmed; remanded Bowens v. Greenwood County Hospital ............... 122,532 Greenwood .......... 07/16/2021 Affirmed Burris v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue ........................... 122,914 Cloud ................... 07/02/2021 Affirmed C.B. v. Bailey ....................... 122,581 Dickinson ............. 06/11/2021 Affirmed in part; dismissed in part Chanthaseng v. State ............ 122,390 Sedgwick ............. 06/11/2021 Affirmed City of Eureka v. Clark ........ 122,669 Greenwood .......... 06/11/2021 Affirmed CRK Development v. Buckhead Lakeside Homeowers Ass'n ............ 123,048 Sedgwick ............. 07/02/2021 Affirmed Delaware Ridge Homes Affirmed; Assn. v. Maddy ................ 122,061 Wyandotte ........... 06/11/2021 remanded Dulaney v. State ................... 122,681 Geary ................... 06/25/2021 Convictions affirmed; sentence vacated; case remanded for resentencing Ferguson v. State.................. 122,209 Cowley................. 06/11/2021 Affirmed Friday v. State ...................... 122,555 Douglas ................ 07/09/2021 Affirmed Frontier Investment Banc Affirmed; Corp. v. Withers .............. 122,659 Johnson ................ 06/18/2021 remanded with directions Gudenkauf Tree Svc. v. Jacobs .............................. 122,028 Nemaha ................ 06/25/2021 Affirmed Guzzo v. Heartland Plant Innovations ...................... 121,811 Workers Comp. Bd 07/16/2021 Affirmed Hoskinson v. Heiman ........... 122,120 Finney .................. 06/04/2021 Affirmed In re Adoption of E.S. .......... 123,301 Riley .................... 07/09/2021 Affirmed In re Care and Treatment of Barnett ............................. 123,103 Ellsworth ............. 07/16/2021 Affirmed In re Care and Treatment of Straith .............................. 123,458 Brown .................. 07/09/2021 Affirmed In re D.H. ............................. 123,461 Gove .................... 06/11/2021 Appeal dismissed (V) DOCKET DISTRICT DATE OF TITLE NUMBER COURT DECISION DECISION In re G.G. ............................. 123,479 Saline ................... 06/25/2021 Affirmed In re Marriage of Biernacki . 122,594 Finney .................. 06/11/2021 Affirmed In re Marriage of Blosser ..... 123,225 McPherson ........... 06/18/2021 Reversed; remanded In re Marriage of Leming .... 122,603 Sedgwick ............. 06/18/2021 Affirmed In re Marriage of Rees ......... 123,206 Ellis...................... 07/16/2021 Affirmed In re R.C. ............................. 123,294 Geary ................... 06/18/2021 Affirmed Jamerson v. Heimgartner ..... 123,015 Reno .................... 06/11/2021 Affirmed Jenkins v. State .................... 122,906 Saline ................... 07/16/2021 Reversed; remanded with directions Johnson County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Jorgensen ...... 122,244 Johnson ................ 06/04/2021 Appeal dismissed L.G. v. I.R. ........................... 122,219 Seward ................. 06/25/2021 Sentence vacated Lynn v. Ross ........................ 119,719 Leavenworth ........ 06/11/2021 Affirmed Nichols v. State .................... 123,043 Leavenworth ........ 07/09/2021 Reversed; remanded with directions Porubsky v. Long ................. 120,727 Shawnee............... 06/11/2021 Affirmed Rutledge v. State .................. 122,898 Edwards ............... 06/25/2021 Affirmed Saquic v. State ..................... 122,623 Seward ................. 06/04/2021 Affirmed Shine v. Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts..................... 121,742 Johnson ................ 06/11/2021 Reversed State ex rel. Secretary, Department for Children and Families v. Cares ....... 121,976 Shawnee............... 06/11/2021 Affirmed State v. Amaro ..................... 122,642 Ford ..................... 07/02/2021 Affirmed State v. Barnett ..................... 123,116 Saline ................... 06/04/2021 Affirmed in part; dismissed in part State v. Blick ........................ 122,777 Sedgwick ............. 06/18/2021 Affirmed State v. Brady ....................... 122,707 Barton .................. 06/11/2021 Affirmed State v. Brown ..................... 122,986 Wyandotte ........... 06/25/2021 Affirmed State v. Buchanan ................ 123,324 Atchison............... 07/02/2021 Reversed; remanded with directions State v. Burrus ..................... 123,429 Sedgwick ............. 07/02/2021 Affirmed State v. Cleaver .................... 122,757 Sedgwick ............. 06/18/2021 Affirmed State v. Copridge.................. 122,751 Sedgwick ............. 06/04/2021 Affirmed State v. Corby ...................... 122,584 Sedgwick ............. 06/04/2021 Affirmed in part; dismissed in part State v. Cusick ..................... 122,416 Sedgwick ............. 06/25/2021 Affirmed State v. Dillard ..................... 122,836 Miami .................. 07/16/2021 Reversed; remand with directions State v. Fagan ....................... 122,605 Jefferson .............. 06/25/2021 Affirmed State v. Garascia .................. 122,969 Shawnee............... 06/04/2021 Affirmed State v. Goodro .................... 121,944 Reno .................... 06/11/2021 Affirmed (VI) DOCKET DISTRICT DATE OF TITLE NUMBER COURT DECISION DECISION State v. Grant-Adams ........... 121,833 Crawford .............. 06/25/2021 Affirmed in part; reversed in part; sentence vacated; case remanded with directions State v. Gwyn ....................... 122,501 Sedgwick ............. 06/18/2021 Affirmed State v. Hameen ................... 122,746 Sedgwick ............. 06/11/2021 Affirmed State v. Hastings .................. 122,184 Miami .................. 07/02/2021 Affirmed State v. Heit ......................... 122,366 Finney .................. 06/25/2021 Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded with directions State v. Heller ...................... 123,132 Reno .................... 06/11/2021 Affirmed in part; dismissed in part State v. Henderson ............... 123,131 Sedgwick ............. 07/02/2021 Affirmed State v. Hill .......................... 123,300 Reno .................... 07/02/2021 Affirmed State v. Huffstutler ............... 123,467 Shawnee............... 06/18/2021 Affirmed State v. Johnson ................... 123,415 123,416 123,417 Sedgwick ............. 06/18/2021 Affirmed State v. Jones ....................... 122,756 Sedgwick ............. 06/11/2021 Affirmed State v. Keith ....................... 122,456 Johnson ................ 06/11/2021 Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded with directions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notice of General Election Jefferson County
    NOTICE OF GENERAL ELECTION JEFFERSON COUNTY In compliance with K.S.A. 25-105, notice is hereby made that a General Election will be held on the 8th day of November, 2016. The polls will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at all regular polling places in Jefferson County. Polling locations are listed after the candidate names. The names of candidates and declarations are as follows. 2016 NATIONAL AND STATE OFFICES US PRESIDENT Clinton and Kaine, Democratic Johnson and Weld, Libertarian Stein and Baraka, Independent Trump and Pence, Republican US SENATE Robert D. Garrard, Edgerton, Libertarian Jerry Moran, Manhattan, Republican Patrick Wiesner, Lawrence, Democratic US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-2nd District James Houston Bales, Lawrence, Libertarian Lynn Jenkins, Topeka, Republican Britani Potter, Ottawa, Democratic KANSAS SENATE-DISTRICT #2 Marci Francisco, Lawrence, Democratic Meredith Richey, Perry, Republican KANSAS SENATE DISTRICT #19 Zach Haney, Topeka, Republican Anthony Hensley, Topeka, Democratic KANSAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-47th District Michael D. Caddell, Nortonville, Democratic Ronald B. Ellis, Meriden, Republican STATE BOARD OF EDUCTION – DISTRICT 4 Ann E. Mah, Topeka, Democratic Sue E. Mollenkamp, Topeka, Republican COUNTY OFFICES COUNTY COMMISSIONER-2nd DISTRICT Wayne Ledbetter, Perry, Republican COUNTY COMMISSIONER- 3RD DISTRICT Richard Malm, Valley Falls, Republican Jeff Van Wey, Valley Falls, Democratic COUNTY CLERK Linda M Buttron, Nortonville, Republican COUNTY TREASURER Lisa L. Buerman, McLouth, Republican COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS Delia Heston, Oskaloosa, Republican COUNTY ATTORNEY Josh Ney, Lawrence, Republican Jacob N. Smith, Shawnee, Democratic COUNTY SHERIFF Jeff Herrig, Ozawkie, Republican TOWNSHIP OFFICES DELAWARE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE Gary Bernasek, Valley Falls, Republican DELAWARE TOWNSHIP TREASURER Lee M.
    [Show full text]
  • Appellate Practice Handbook
    KANSAS APPELLATE PRACTICE HANDBOOK 6TH EDITION KANSAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL Subscription Information The Kansas Appellate Practice Handbook is updated on a periodic basis with supplements to reflect important changes in both statutory law and case law. Your purchase of this publication automatically records your subscription for the update service. If you do not wish to receive the supplements, you must inform the Judicial Council. You may contact the Judicial Council by e-mail at [email protected], by telephone at (785) 296-2498 or by mail at: Kansas Judicial Council 301 SW 10th, Ste. 140 Topeka, KS 66612 © 2019 KANSAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii PREFACE TO THE SIXTH EDITION This is the first edition of the Handbook since the advent of electronic filing of appellate cases. All prior editions, while containing some useful suggestions, are obsolete. With clear marching orders from our Supreme Court, all appellate attorneys must enroll and monitor their cases. Paper filing is now relegated to litigants that are unrepresented. Prompted by these massive changes we have consolidated some chapters and subjects and created new sections for electronic filing. But there is more to an appeal than just getting in the door. Scheduling, briefing, and pre- and post-opinion motion practice are dealt with. We sincerely hope that this work will be helpful to all who practice in this important area of the law. It is an attempt to open up the mysteries of electronic filing of appellate cases in Kansas. I must shout from the rooftops my praise for Christy Molzen with the Kansas Judicial Council, who has done all of the heavy lifting in putting this handbook together.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Washburn Law in the Judiciary and a Lecturer on Criminal Law at Washburn Appointed by President Truman in 1949, and Is for Many Years, and Corwin A
    Washburn Law School Association Board of Governors ■ Bernard A. Bianchino, President ’74 D. Duke Dupre, President-Elect ‘73 Steven G. Cooper, Vice President ‘73 Edward Sloan ‘06 David E. Pierce, Secretary Treasurer ‘77 Linda D. Henry Elrod, Exec. Secretary ‘72 H. Allan Caldwell, Past President ‘73 D. Duke Dupre, Foundation President ‘7 3 Lillian A. Apodaca ‘85 Rita J. Bicknell ‘95 Hon. J. Patrick Brazil ‘62 William D. Bunten ‘56 Nancy Landis Caplinger ‘85 William Smith ‘14 Stephen W. Cavanaugh ‘80 Stewart L. Entz ‘65 David A. Fenley ‘79 John Dawson ‘06 Carol G. Green ‘81 Leslie Hess ‘85 Matthew C. Hesse ‘85 The initial graduates of Winton M. Hinkle ‘68 Washburn Law School established Paul R. Hoferer ‘75 Jane Chandler Holt ‘85 a tradition of public service. Laura L. Ice ‘84 John K. Kleinheksel ‘72 Of the 69 members of the school’s first Terry L. Kramer ‘68 ten graduating classes, 37 had held some Ward E. Loyd ‘68 Kent P. Smith ‘66 government position by 1917. David R. Tripp ‘71 Hon. Gregory L. Waller ‘73 The tradition they established has Roger W. Warren ‘88 continued and been enhanced by the service Teri Wilford Wood ‘78 ■ of Washburn’s graduates on the appellate and federal courts. 4 Spring/ Summer 2003 Two of the 17 members of Washburn Law’s first graduat- eventeen graduates of Was h b u r n University ing class, John S. Dawson ‘06 and Edward R. Sloan ‘06, School of Law have been Justices of the became Kansas Supreme Court Justices. Further, the first S two Washburn Justices, Dawson and William A.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Kansas Bar Association, Vol. 73 (2004)
    Internet Researcher: State Appellate Court Opinions By John E. Christensen 1. Introduction NOTE: Slip opinions are subject to motions for rehear­ ing and petitions for review prior to issuance of the ntil the advent of the Internet, attorney options for mandate. Before citing a slip opinion, determine that U computer-assisted case law research were essentially the opinion has become final. Slip opinions also are limited to Lexis, Westlaw, and CD-ROM products subject to modification orders and editorial corrections offered for individual states or regions. Today's researchers prior to publication in the official reporters. Consult the have a variety of viable choices. This article highlights elec­ bound volumes of Kansas Reports and Kansas Court of tronic resources associated with researching Kansas Appeals Reports for the final, official texts of the opin­ Supreme Court and Court of Appeals opinions, as well as ions of the Kansas Supreme Court and the Kansas free and low-cost options for researching appellate court Court of Appeals. Attorneys are requested to call opinions in all states. prompt attention to typographical or other formal errors; please notify Richard Ross, Reporter of II. Kansas Decisions, Kansas Judicial Center, 301 West 10th, Topeka, KS 66612-1598; e-mail, [email protected]; Kansas attorneys are fortunate to have convenient access phone, 785-296-3214. to recent decisions of the Kansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals at a free website (www.kscourts.org/kscases), A link is provided to the Kansas Appellate Courts Case maintained as a cooperative project by the Courts and the Inquiry System, which provides detailed docket information Washburn University School of Law Library and the in real time for cases submitted since January 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 114,153 in the SUPREME COURT of the STATE OF
    No. 114,153 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS HODES & NAUSER, MDS, PA, HERBERT C. HODES, M.D., and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DEREK SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Kansas, and STEPHEN M. HOWE, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Johnson County, Defendants-Appellants. PETITION FOR REVIEW Appeal from the District Court of Shawnee County Honorable Larry D. Hendricks, Judge District Court Case No. 2015-CV-490 Stephen R. McAllister, KS Sup. Ct. No. 15845 Solicitor General of Kansas Memorial Bldg., 2nd Floor 120 SW 10th Avenue Topeka, Kansas 66612-1597 Telephone: (785) 296-2215 Fax: (785) 291-3767 Email: [email protected] Counsel for Appellants Expedited Review Requested TABLE OF CONTENTS AND AUTHORITIES Page PRAYER FOR REVIEW ..................................................................................................1 DATE OF THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS ....................................2 ISSUES FOR WHICH REVIEW IS SOUGHT ..............................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................................................................3 Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) ......4, 5 Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007) ..........................................................................5 ARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................6 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 11-106870-S in the SUPREME COURT of KANSAS IN
    Appeal No. 11-106870-S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS IN THE MATTER OF : : DA 10088 and DA 10598 : PHILLIP D. KLINE, : : Respondent. : _________________________________________________________ MOTION OF RESPONDENT PHILLIP D. KLINE FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE KAREN ARNOLD-BURGER _________________________________________________________ Respondent Phillip D. Kline, former Attorney General the State of Kansas, hereby moves for the recusal of Judge Karen Arnold-Burger from any further participation in this appeal. Per the Order of Presiding Justice Daniel Biles on June 4, 2012, Judge Arnold-Burger is one of five Kansas judges assigned to hear this appeal in the aftermath of the May 18, 2012 recusal of five sitting justices of this Court. I. Introduction. As editor of The Verdict, the official quarterly publication of the Kansas Municipal Judges Association (“KMJA”), Judge Karen Arnold-Burger was instrumental in publishing numerous false statements regarding Mr. Kline’s investigation of Kansas abortion clinics. These false statements about facts at issue in this proceeding provide a reasonable basis to question Judge Arnold-Burger’s impartiality, thereby requiring recusal. See Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(E)(1) (1995). Specifically, a synopsis of Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood v. Kline, 287 Kan. 372, 433, 197 P.3d 370 (2008) (hereinafter CHPP v. Kline) in the Winter 2009 edition of The Verdict made numerous false assertions supported neither by the CHPP v. Kline opinion itself nor the underlying facts.1 Most of these gratuitous and untrue statements improperly cast Mr. Kline’s conduct in a false negative light and uniformly tended to disparage him before the Kansas judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kansas Judiciary
    Office of the Secretary of State The Kansas Judiciary Kansas Judicial Center 301 S.W. 10th Ave., Topeka 66612-1507 785-296-3229 www.kscourts.org Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice: Marla J. Luckert Justices: Carol A. Beier, Dan Biles, Eric S. Rosen, Caleb Stegall, Keynen "KJ" Wall, Evelyn Z. Wilson The Kansas Supreme Court is the highest court in Kansas. It consists of seven justices, each of whom is selected by the governor from a list of three qualified individuals submitted by the Supreme Court Nominating Commission. After the first year in office, a justice is subject to a retention vote in the next general election. If a majority of electors votes to retain the justice, he or she remains in office for a term of six years. Justices are subject to a similar retention vote at the conclusion of each term. The justice who is senior in terms of continuous service is designated by the Kansas Constitution as the chief justice, unless he or she declines or resigns the position. The chief justice has general ad- ministrative supervision over the affairs of the court and of the unified judicial department of the state. Kansas Court of Appeals Chief Judge: Karen Arnold-Burger Judges: G. Gordon Atcheson, David E. Bruns, Michael B. Buser, Kathryn A. Gardner, Henry W. Green Jr., Stephen D. Hill, Steve A. Leben, Thomas E. Malone, G. Joseph Pierron Jr., Anthony J. Powell, Kim R. Schroeder, Melissa Taylor Standridge, Sarah Warner The Kansas Court of Appeals consists of 14 judges. Candidates for appointment to the court of appeals apply to and are selected by the governor, subject to confirmation by a majority vote of the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Ohio Writing Manual Is the First Comprehensive Guide to Judicial Opinion Writing Published by the Court for Its Use
    T S C of O WRITING MANUAL A Guide to Citations, Style, and Judicial Opinion Writing effective july 1, 2013 second edition Published for the Supreme Court of Ohio WRITING MANUAL A Guide to Citations, Style, and Judicial Opinion Writing MAUREEN O’CONNOR Chief Justice SHARON L. KENNEDY PATRICK F. FISCHER R. PATRICK DeWINE MICHAEL P. DONNELLY MELODY J. STEWART JENNIFER BRUNNER Justices STEPHANIE E. HESS Interim administrative Director The Supreme Court of Ohio Style Manual Committee HON. JUDITH ANN LANZINGER JUSTICE, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Chair HON. TERRENCE O’DONNELL JUSTICE, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO HON. JUDITH L. FRENCH JUSTICE, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STEVEN C. HOLLON ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ARTHUR J. MARZIALE JR., Retired July 31, 2012 DIRECTOR OF LEGAL RESOURCES, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SANDRA H. GROSKO REPORTER OF DECISIONS, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RALPH W. PRESTON, Retired July 31, 2011 REPORTER OF DECISIONS, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MARY BETH BEAZLEY ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF LAW AND DIRECTOR OF LEGAL WRITING, MORITZ COLLEGE OF LAW, THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY C. MICHAEL WALSH ADMINISTRATOR, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT The committee wishes to gratefully acknowledge the invaluable contributions of editor Pam Wynsen of the Reporter’s Office, as well as the excellent formatting assistance of John VanNorman, Policy and Research Counsel to the Administrative Director. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE...........................................................................................................................ix
    [Show full text]
  • State Court Caseload Statistics
    -- National Center for State Courts 3 4185 00003622 7 State Court Caseload Statistics: A joint project of the Conference of State Court Administrators, the State Justice Institute, and the National Center for State Courts - State Court Caseload Statistics:IS‘Seta- 5 < Annual Report, 2992 Court Statistics Project Staff Brian J.Ostrom Steven E. Hairston Director Staff Associate Karen Gillions Way Carol R. Flango Staff Associate Staff Associate Natalie B. Davis Administrative Secretary State Justice lsJI Insti tu te A joint project of the Conference of State Court Administrators, the State Justice Institute, and the National Center for State Courts’ Court Statistics Project February 1994 /LC& k 4-1-4Y library ‘‘1% Notional Center for State Courts ZCO Newport Ave. Wilfiamsburg, VA 23 187-8798 / I Copyright 1994 National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656-134-8 National Center Publication Number R-154 Suggested Citation: Brian J. Ostrom, et a]., State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report 1992 (National Center for State Courts 1994) This Report was developed under Grant SJI-91-07X-C-B-007-P93-1 from the State Justice Institute. Points of view expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the State Justice Institute. Conference of State Court Administrators Court Statistics Committee J. Denis Moran, Chairman (1983 to present) Marc Galanter (1986 to present) Director of State Courts, Wisconsin Evjue-Bascom Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Robert Barnoski (1990 to present) Daniel J. Hall (1990 to present) Manager, Research & Information Services, Office Director of Planning and Analysis, Office of the Administrator for the Courts, Washington of the State Court Administrator, Colorado John A.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Call to Action
    A National Call to Action Access to Justice for Limited English Proficient Litigants: Creating Solutions to Language Barriers in State Courts July 2013 For further information contact: Konstantina Vagenas, Director/Chief Counsel Language and Access to Justice Initiatives National Center for State Courts 2425 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 350 Arlington, VA 22201-3326 [email protected] Additional Resources can be found at: www.ncsc.org Copyright 2013 National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Avenue Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147 ISBN 978-0-89656-287-5 This document has been prepared with support from a State Justice Institute grant. The points of view and opinions offered in this call to action are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policies or position of the State Justice Institute or the National Center for State Courts. Table of Contents Preface and Acknowledgments i Executive Summary ii Introduction iv Chapter 1: Pre-Summit Assessment 1 Chapter 2: The Summit 11 Plenary Sessions 12 Workshops 13 Team Exercises: Identifying Priorities and Developing Action Plans 16 Chapter 3: Action Steps: A Road Map to a Successful Language Access Program 17 Step 1: Identifying the Need for Language Assistance 19 Step 2: Establishing and Maintaining Oversight 22 Step 3: Implementing Monitoring Procedures 25 Step 4: Training and Educating Court Staff and Stakeholders 27 Step 5: Training and Certifying Interpreters 30 Step 6: Enhancing Collaboration and Information Sharing 33 Step 7: Utilizing Remote Interpreting Technology 35 Step 8: Ensuring Compliance with Legal Requirements 38 Step 9: Exploring Strategies to Obtain Funding 40 Appendix A: Summit Agenda 44 Appendix B: List of Summit Attendees/State Delegations 50 Preface and Acknowledgments Our American system of justice cannot function if it is not designed to adequately address the constitutional rights of a very large and ever-growing portion of its population, namely litigants with limited English proficiency (LEP).
    [Show full text]
  • Citation Practices of the Kansas Supreme Court and Kansas Court of Appeals
    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 1998 Citation Practices of the Kansas Supreme Court and Kansas Court of Appeals Joseph A. Custer Case Western University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Custer, Joseph A., "Citation Practices of the Kansas Supreme Court and Kansas Court of Appeals" (1998). Faculty Publications. 2105. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/2105 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Citation Practices of the Kansas Supreme Court and Kansas Court of Appeals Joseph A. Custer 1. Introduction more than once in a case but different issues of This article examines the citation practices the cited opinion were discussed the cites were of the Kansas Supreme Court and the Kansas treated as distinct. Any citation to a code or Court of Appeals. The Kansas Court of regulation was counted separately as long as Appeals has only been in its present form since there was a distinct subdivision indicating dif- 1977. This study therefore is based heavily on ferent code or regulation sections. All parts of a fifteen year period from 1982 through 1996: the opinion were studied and analyzed, includ- fifteen years in which both the Kansas ing dissenting opinions. The 200 cases from Supreme Court and Kansas Court of Appeals 1995 along with the 100 cases from both 1935 have been in operation.
    [Show full text]