DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Equatoria State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern Equatoria State East! ern Equatoria State Map (as of Dec 2016) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 32°E 33°E ! 34°E 35°E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anyidi Pe!ngko ! Marongodoa Towoth Mewun !! R. !" Upper Boma Bor Kangen ! ! ! Brong Kwal Tiu Macdit ! ! Gurgo Karita Gurbi Tukls! Pajok ! ! ! Nongwoli ! Boma Balwan !! Aluk Gw! alla! ! Katanich Titong Munini Cuei Machar Awan ! R. K ! ! ang Wowa Sudan ! Aliab ! en ! Logoda ! Malek ! ! Bor South ! Rigl Chilimun N Pibor N ° ° ! Pariak Jonglei Katchikan Kichepo !Pariak ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! 6 ! Lowelli a Lochiret River Bellel l l ! Aw! erial i Kenamuke Swamp t ! ! ! Panabang o L Ngechele r ! Neria . ! a Kanopir Natibok Kabalatigo R ! ! ! w South Ethiopia ! Moru Kimod Rongada G ! Central . Tombi R African Sudan R ! . N R. Republic Gwojo-Adung a Ch ! r Kassangor alb ! Tiarki o ! o !Bori ng ! ! ! Moru Kerri Kuron Gigging ! ! ! Mun! i " ! Karn Ethi Kerkeng ! ! ! ! Nakadocwa Gemmaiza i r i Democratic t !Kobowen Swamp Moru Ethi Bo!richadi Bokuna ! Poko i Kassengo Selemani Wani Mika ! ! Nabwel ! ! Pagar S ! Republic of Congo ! Chabong Uganda !Tukara . ! ! R Kenyi River Nakua Kenya ! Moru Angbin Mukajo Terekeka ! ! ! ! Bulu Koli Gali ) Awakot Lotimor ! t ! ! ! ! Akitukomoi i Tumu River Gera ! ! Nanyangachor ! e l Napalap ! l Kalaruz ! Namoropus i ! t ! Logono Kangitabok Lomokori o Eyata Moru Kolinyagkopil ! Terekeka ! ! ! ! ETHIOPIA Wit " L ! Natilup Swamp Magara! ( Umm Gura Mwanyakapin ! ! R n Abuilingakin!e ! Lomareng Plateau . R N ! W R aku Juban Rambo ya Lokodopotok . ! l . a ! h ! ! ! L ( a N Lomuleye Katirima Nai A S i ! ! a t ! o Badigeru Swamp k River Lokuja Losagam Musha Lukwatuk Pass Doinyoro East c e a h ! ! ! p ! ! ! Buboli o i) r ! o N L o River Lokorowa Pongo Watha Peth Hills ! t . ! ! i Nawitapal Kolobeleng o l Kapoeta North ! ! ! e ! ! Mogos R k Kagethi " Lopokori ! Nomogonjet Kanyabu o Moru Ethi ! Lokomarukest Lotakawa ! ! ! ! ! l Kedowa Lafon Chokagiling ! ! Karakamuge ! Donyiro West Mangalla ! Kaliapus Nyangatom Kothokan " Bwoda Mediket Nakwa ! Mongalla Loikit ! ! ! ! ! ! !Karotho Moru Agippi ! Kapirak ! R Kapoeta East ! e Kushadah Kalimulinga Nykorilik Napas River Lopotokol Laturigan l ! . !! ! ! ! i Nakwaparich Akoribok River Nakorimanyung L ! ! ! N Magos Lila Morkorro o Lachua Loelli ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e t Kachinga ! it i ! Loggia l Natodomeri l ! ! h a River Nakorimanman River Kadoke Natapara Lafon Lokuja ! ! ! ! ! W " Lomwanagippi Murua Ngabuin ! ! ! ! N Tingayta ! ! Nalingakua N ° Luala ! Riwoto Nakapokan ° ! Elabilab Plain ! ! 5 5 Kabarait Losinga ! ! ! Loriwo Tulu Satan Nataba Natelo Loruth Nangolemoru ! ! ! Lotelepey ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R ! River Lomayen Timan Nitingayo Manwaiti ! ! ! ! River Luri Central Equatoria . ! Lobobonya ! Kong'omo Liwan ! U Lumeyen Riwoto !! ! ! ! ! Moru A!bab ! ! ! ! ! ! Mogiri Longiro! Katiakin ! ! Chief-Lotiang Lukulin Gondokoro ! g ! ! Kenamuke Kalineuri ! ! ! ! Nag!ag!utan Nongolibe u ! ! Nadomeit ! Lanya Loyoro Nabolibol ! ! ! River Wanga r ! ! Nekap! ! Nakalale Kayaket Kaitede ! r ! ! Eastern ! Equatoria ! ! ! ! ! ! ! River Kaielot o Lolepon n Lokitoi Karenga Ghsbah Leruito! ! Kowabala ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anakanaka Kalyorok Nachua e ! ! Muraagipi ! ! ! ^ Manwayti Kayapata Naliel y ! ! ! ! Homawur ! ! ! ! Tiw! ai ! Lomuria-Ang'koiyo Lonukeaguman ! a Naramam ! Loyurien R Nithapirri ! Mura ! ! ! ! ! Lologo ! Litoyro ! Kwamkunyu m Nakolo Naoyeta Lorienetom Nakiwalet ! Kapoeta ! . ! ! ! ! ! Jeraputa Kineti Imehejek ! ! o Lumian Mayen ! Buripiong Son ! ! " T ! ! ! ! ! L Murua-Kidel Napeduru Lobongoi Kathiren Kabokor Ing'ole Idali Lokidoko!toy Nebur a ! ! Kaludo . ! ! ! ! C!hawa ! ! r ! ! ! Tagu!!k!! Buna Woteng Kaldo R a Lokolio Post Juba Rejaf ! Buno! ! ! Kalok ! Kokurd ! Ngangala Omio ! s ! ! ! ! Kapoko Kampi Ya Ndegi Kimotong ! Napotpot h ! ! ! ! ! ! Lil ! ! Khor Jeep Kalacha Loith Kangararicho Loropio ! Kidepo ! ! Kalawath! ! ! ! !Kaieris! Lefureur R ! Iboni ! ! ! ! Lochorokotil ! ! ! Liria ! ! ! Athigiriait . Loronyo ! ! Lourum ! Koturomi " ! ! Laryok Nakatur Lotorobu Lopur Kuju ! Nyake U Lohutok ! ! ! n ! ! ! ! Makidi R Koloricho Napeded e R Irido Ilyeito g ! ! i ! u . Lolim a ! ! Itchire ! Lalanga ! ! ! . ! ! K Lotimi L ! r Kapoeta So! uth ! M Lukala r Tia ! i ! . e o Loudo Nesitu Langdimoleh Kidongi d K! ugulu Lolabo ! Lagere i Fedde !! ! e ! ! Kuba f ! ! Apelli Koperat ! Nalupongorr R ! o ! p R r Lokiliri o Kolinmum ! Yaffa o Loming . ! ! ! Kokizili Narus Monji ( Longairo Sauwo Ilieu ! " G ! Duduru L ! ! ! River Lolabo ! Okaru ! ro a e ! ! ! Lorangi zo ! f Hiyala ! Watit N t u Momoi ! ! Keyala . o Kuiaji !! R Nakodo ! r ! Tohubak Lomingushe ! ! Nadapal m Sindir!u e ! ! ! Duro u Naguri Lauro e ! r Ibalani Torit Taudal ! ! Nakodok ) ! ! l ! ! ! Longumu i River Kinyeti Lobira n Loguto Irume ! Faraksika Naterikeki o ! ! ! ! e Loming g !Egwi ! Chaghari Tolubi! y Lomodik o ! ! Tok Tor!it Lolianga ! ! a Lobuli ! ! Budi m Lobonok ! Sunnat ! m River Manya Iyedo Imodongi ! o ! ! ! Chayrong o Korr ! Lagora Logiliok Iwowa L ! ! Chakari L ! Ingama ! ! ! ! . Logote! Gunyoro Naqichot R ! Kit Omit R ! ! ! Dongotona Chukudum ! ! " Na!tinga (new site) Lopangwe Odumi Gonyiro Logowonok Isoke ! Naligedi ! ! R. Ki ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t Ramili Lotese Lofi ! Logak ! ! ! ! ! ! Lorus Legend ! ! R Kitamo Loro Natinga Kainye Fagar ! ! Karena ! ! . Amiting Iniela Gu!!ma !Cherokaj ! ! ! A ! ! Molongori Itogom ! Wontambi y ! ! ! KENYA Nyakol i Isuluk Laer!di Larema Masawa ! Abara Manajok! ! ^! Country Capital ! ! Mogo Amotong Magwi ! ! ! ! Ameh " ! Kilkil Lo!tiki! UNDSS Access Constraint Karpeto Chilikwa Lopulong ! ! Lo!tome ! ! Ogwo ! Kimoro River Ogum ! Nagishot ! ! !! Loguli Losua ! ! Kidepo ! ! ! Nyala Settlements Afoyi Ikotos ! ! Lotukei <all other values> ! River Ayi Lom! o " Kiman ! Ame !! ! Arado ! Obbo Palotaka ! Urungo ! ! ! ! ! ! " Gilo Lorim! a ! Ikatik R Moli ! !! Imaje !Iyak Type ! Palebek Kororo Upper Talanga ! ! Force Protection ! ! " . Lomothing Konoro ! Bogora Katiri K ! N ! ! N Goya i ° ° Ikotos State Capitals Fadier!i Lerua Lothik m ! ! ! Lotome ! MOSS Compliance 4 Danga ! Amtaini 4 ! Mede ! ! a ! ! Kuio ! Uaiya Kinyeti Kipia Oiro ! Mogiri ! !! ! ! ! ! n " ! ! Warcha Adala ! Lotolo Tule ! Lire ! ! Logoforok! ! Larger Towns ! Opari Palwar International Boundaries ! Kerepi ! ! ! Issore ! ! ! Patibe ! Latafor R Narus Karila ! ! W ! ! ! . " " ! ! Kajo-Keji ! Magwi Lomariti Tereteinia ! ! ! " ! h ! Logoma Pajo!k R. A ! Logofero ! K Ituko Iluko Bira Towns ! ! ! " ! t!eppi ! i ! ! ! Admin. Units State Level ! it Pageri Atepi Ebodze Kisina m Kenyiba ! u e ! ! Lerum ! ! Lopodi ! " Inger ! a ! ! ! Mesika !y ! N i ! Jama ! ! ! a i p Adusha Teba ! n Big Villages le ! ! L!ab!one Mosingo Tsertanya ! ! ! K ! Loa p Ingiji ! ! !Lofus Admin. Units County Level Bori ! . te Pugee Obiri ! ! A ! ! Bera ! ! Kajo-keji R . Ludwera ! ! Awe Tufungi R Small Villages ! R! ! Labone R. ! . R. A M O ssu! or Jolimo Pomoju ! a R. a m ! ! ! As ur to ! sua Nyim o Main Rivers Jalei Aribo r ! Aswa o !Bamurye ! Nimule National Park Apalla Gelle Lakes/Marshland ! ! Nyimur t r " ! ! lbe ! A Nimule R. U n UGANDA y U a ¯ n m y 0 12.5 25 50 75 Kilometers a a m a 32°E 33°E 34°E 35°E Creation Date: 07 December 2016 Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/south-sudan *Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined. **Final status of Abyei region is not yet determined. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 95 As at 23:59 Hours, 29 September to 5 October 2014
    Republic of South Sudan Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 95 as at 23:59 Hours, 29 September to 5 October 2014 Situation Update As of 5 October 2014, a total of 6,139 cholera cases including 139 deaths (CFR 2%) had been reportedTable 1. Summary in South of Suda choleran as cases summarizedreported in in Juba Tables County 1 and, 23 2.April – 5 October 2014 New New New deaths Total cases Total Total admisions discharges Total Total cases Reporting Sites 29 Sept to currently facility community Total cases 29 Sept to 29 Sept to deaths discharged 5 Oct 2014 admitted deaths deaths 5 Oct 2014 5 Oct 2014 JTH CTC 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 1466 1482 Gurei CTC (changed to ORP) Closed 28 July 2 0 2 365 367 Tongping CTC 0 2 1 3 69 72 Closed August Jube 3/UN House CTC Closed August 0 0 0 0 97 97 Nyakuron West CTC Closed 15 July 0 0 0 18 18 Gumbo CTC Closed 5 July 0 0 0 48 48 Nyakuron ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 20 20 Munuki ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 8 8 Gumbo ORP Closed 15 July 0 3 3 67 70 Pager PHCU 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 42 48 Other sites 0 0 0 1 15 16 1 17 Total 0 0 0 0 22 24 46 2201 2247 N.B. To prevent double counting of patients, transferred cases from ORPs to CTCs are not counted in the ORPs. Table 2: Summary of cholera cases reported outside Juba County, 23 April – 5 October 2014 New New New Total cases Total Total admisions discharges deaths Total Total cases Total States Reporting Sites currently facility community 29 Sept to 29 Sept to 29 Sep to deaths discharged cases admitted deaths deaths 5 Oct 2014 5 Oct 2014 5 Oct 14 Kajo-Keji civil hospital 0 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Ss 9303 Ee Kapoeta North Cou
    SOUTH SUDAN Kapoeta North County reference map SUDAN Pibor JONGLEI ETHIOPIA CAR DRC KENYA UGANDA EASTERN EQUATORIA Kenyi Lafon Kapoeta East Akitukomoi Kangitabok Lomokori Kapoeta North Ngigalingatun Kangibun Kalopedet Lokidangoai Nomogonjet Nawitapal Mogos Chokagiling Lorutuk Lokoges Nakwa Owetiani Nawabei Natatur Kamaliato Kanyowokol Karibungura Lokale Nagira Belengtobok Tuliabok Lokorechoke Kadapangolol Akoribok Nakwaparich Kalobeliang Wana Kachinga Lomus Lotiakara Pucwa Lopetet Nawao Lokorilam Naduket Tingayta Lodomei Kibak Nakatiti International boundary Nakapangiteng Napusiret Napulak State boundary Loriwo County boundary Kochoto Naminitotit Parpar Undetermined boundary Napusireit Nakwamoru Abyei region Kotak Kasotongor Napochorege Katiakin Nawayareng Riwoto Lokorumor Country capital Nangoletire Lokualem Lumeyen Logerain Lomidila Takankim Lobei Administrative centre/County capital Lokwamor Nacukut Naronyi Nakoret Lotiekar Namukeris Principal town Napotit Naoyatir Nakore Napureit Secondary town Lokwamiro Narubui Barach Lolepon Lotiri Paima Village Loregai Narongyet Lochuloit Kabuni Primary road Kudule Locheler Napusiria Napotpot Secondary road Nacholobo Tertiary road Budi Idong Main river Kapoeta South 0 5 10 km The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined. Final status of Abyei area is not yet determined. Created: March 2020 | Code: SS-9303 | Sources: OCHA, SSNBS | Feedback: [email protected] | unocha.org/south-sudan | reliefweb.int/country/ssd | southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info .
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector
    The Criminalization of South Sudan’s Gold Sector Kleptocratic Networks and the Gold Trade in Kapoeta By the Enough Project April 2020* A Precious Resource in an Arid Land Within the area historically known as the state of Eastern Equatoria, Kapoeta is a semi-arid rangeland of clay soil dotted with short, thorny shrubs and other vegetation.1 Precious resources lie below this desolate landscape. Eastern Equatoria, along with the region historically known as Central Equatoria, contains some of the most important and best-known sites for artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM). Some estimates put the number of miners at 60,000 working at 80 different locations in the area, including Nanaknak, Lauro (Didinga Hills), Napotpot, and Namurnyang. Locals primarily use traditional mining techniques, panning for gold from seasonal streams in various villages. The work provides miners’ families resources to support their basic needs.2 Kapoeta’s increasingly coveted gold resources are being smuggled across the border into Kenya with the active complicity of local and national governments. This smuggling network, which involves international mining interests, has contributed to increased militarization.3 Armed actors and corrupt networks are fueling low-intensity conflicts over land, particularly over the ownership of mining sites, and causing the militarization of gold mining in the area. Poor oversight and conflicts over the control of resources between the Kapoeta government and the national government in Juba enrich opportunistic actors both inside and outside South Sudan. Inefficient regulation and poor gold outflows have helped make ASM an ideal target for capture by those who seek to finance armed groups, perpetrate violence, exploit mining communities, and exacerbate divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit to Terekeka [Oct 2020]
    Visit to Terekeka and St Stephen’s School, South Sudan – 17th – 18th March 2020 Report by Mike Quinlan Introduction Following my participation in a SOMA (Sharing of Ministries Abroad) Mission to the Internal Province of Jonglei from 7th to 16th March, I was able to make a short visit to Terekeka and to St Stephen’s School escorted by the Bishop of Terekeka, Rt Rev Paul Moji Fajala. Bp Paul met me at my hotel in Juba and drove me to Terekeka on the morning of Tuesday 17th March. We visited St Stephen’s School and I also saw some of the other sights of Terekeka (mainly boats on the bank of the Nile). Bp Paul also took me to see his house in Terekeka. After a night at a comfortable hotel, which had electricity and a fan in the evening, Bp Paul drove me back to Juba on the morning of Wednesday 18th March. I was privileged to be taken to meet the Primate of the Episcopal Church of South Sudan (ECSS), Most Rev Justin Badi Arama at his office. ABp Justin is also the chair of SOMA’s International Council. Bp Paul also took me to his house in Juba, where I met his wife, Edina, and had lunch before he took me to the airport to catch my flight back to UK. Terekeka is a small town about 75km north of Juba on the west bank of the White Nile. It takes about two and a half hours to drive there from Juba on a dirt road that becomes very difficult during the rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Situation Analysis and Hotspot Mapping in South Sudan
    GTFCC Meeting for the Working Groups on CHOLERA SITUATION ANALYSIS Surveillance AND HOTSPOT MAPPING IN (Epidemiology and Laboratory) (15th to 17th SOUTH SUDAN March 2019) BACKGROUN D 1. South Sudan borders Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia, Sudan, DR Congo, & CAR 2. Got independence in 2011 3. Protracted Grade 3 crisis since 2013 (situation improving since Sept 2018) 4. Severe food insecurity – 7.1million (63% of population) – 45,000 faced with famine 5. 1.87 million IDPs & 2.27million refugees to neighboring countries 1. Multisectoral taskforce in place chaired by MoH with the other sectors (Water & COORDINATION OF Humanitarian Affairs) and partners (Health + WASH) CHOLERA CONTROL clusters as members 2. Draft National Cholera Control Plan pending WASH assessment & stakeholder review/costing 3. Implemented preventive OCV campaigns since 2017 (2.9 million doses approved 27/Mar/2019) 4. Sub-optimal involvement of other sectors and WASH in OCV preventive campaigns CHOLERA IN SOUTH 1. South Sudan endemic for SUDANcholera 2. Since the 2013 crisis onset – cholera outbreaks – 2014 - 2017 3. Between 2014-2017 at least 28,676 cases & 644 deaths reported 4. All outbreaks started in Juba 5. Cases reported along River Nile, cattle camps, IDPs, islands, & Commercial hubs 1600 Cholera cases in South Sudan, 2014 s e s a 1200 Cholera cases in South Sudan, 2014 s c e f s a o 2014 c f r 800 o 2014 e 1000 r e b b m 400 m CHOLERA IN u u N N 0 0 1 3 5 7 9 111315171921232527293133353739414345474951 1 3 5 7 9 111315171921232527293133353739414345474951 Week of onset Week of onset 1900 Cholera cases in South Sudan, 2015 s e s SOUTH a c 1600 Cholera cases in South Sudan, 2015 f o s r 900 e e 2015 b s m a 1200 u c N f o -100 r 800 1 3 5 7 9 111315171921232527293133353739414345474951 SUDAN e 2015 Week of onset b m 400 u Cholera cases in South Sudan, 2016 s N e 1600 s a 0 c f 1200 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009
    IOM Tracking of Spontaneous Returns Project Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Background....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. En-route Tracking............................................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Area of Return Tracking................................................................................................................... 6 4. Capacity Building of SSRRC and VRRC......................................................................................... 6 5. Total Estimated Number of Returns ................................................................................................. 8 6. Analysis of Area of Return - Cumulative Data, February 2007 to June 2009................................ 10 6.1. Total
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Response Plan South Sudan
    HUMANITARIAN HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME CYCLE 2021 RESPONSE PLAN ISSUED MARCH 2021 SOUTH SUDAN 01 About This document is consolidated by OCHA on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. The Humanitarian Response Plan is a presentation of the coordinated, strategic response devised by humanitarian agencies in order to meet the acute needs of people affected by the crisis. It is based on, and responds to, evidence of needs described in the Humanitarian Needs Overview. Manyo Renk Renk SUDAN Kaka Melut Melut Maban Fashoda Riangnhom Bunj Oriny UPPER NILE Abyei region Pariang Panyikang Malakal Abiemnhom Tonga Malakal Baliet Aweil East Abiemnom Rubkona Aweil North Guit Baliet Dajo Gok-Machar War-Awar Twic Mayom Atar 2 Longochuk Bentiu Guit Mayom Old Fangak Aweil West Turalei Canal/Pigi Gogrial East Fangak Aweil Gogrial Luakpiny/Nasir Maiwut Aweil West UNITY Yomding Raja NORTHERN South Gogrial Koch Nyirol Nasir Maiwut Raja BAHR EL Bar Mayen Koch Ulang Kuajok WARRAP Leer Lunyaker Ayod GHAAL Tonj North Mayendit Ayod Aweil Centre Waat Mayendit Leer Uror Warrap Romic ETHIOPIA Yuai Tonj East WESTERN BAHR Nyal Duk Fadiat Akobo Wau Maper JONGLEI CENTRAL EL GHAAL Panyijiar Duk Akobo Kuajiena Rumbek North AFRICAN Wau Tonj Pochalla Jur River Cueibet REPUBLIC Tonj Rumbek Kongor Pochala South Cueibet Centre Yirol East Twic East Rumbek Adior Pibor Rumbek East Nagero Wullu Akot Yirol Bor South Tambura Yirol West Nagero LAKES Awerial Pibor Bor Boma Wulu Mvolo Awerial Mvolo Tambura Terekeka Kapoeta International boundary WESTERN Terekeka North Mundri
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Corridor Diagnostic Study and Action Plan
    South Sudan Corridor Diagnostic Study and Action Plan Final Report September 2012 This publication was produced by Nathan Associates Inc. for review by the United States Agency for International Development under the USAID Worldwide Trade Capacity Building (TCBoost) Project. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. South Sudan Corridor Diagnostic Study and Action Plan Final Report SUBMITTED UNDER Contract No. EEM-I-00-07-00009-00, Order No. 2 SUBMITTED TO Mark Sorensen USAID/South Sudan Cory O’Hara USAID EGAT/EG Office SUBMITTED BY Nathan Associates Inc 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1200 Arlington, Virginia 22201 703.516.7700 [email protected] [email protected] DISCLAIMER This document is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Its contents are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contents Acronyms v Executive Summary vii 1. Introduction 1 Study Scope 1 Report Organization 3 2. Corridor Infrastructure 5 South Sudan Corridor Existing Infrastructure and Condition 5 3. Corridor Performance 19 Performance Data: Nodes and Links 19 Overview of South Sudan Corridor Performance 25 South Sudan Corridor Cost and Time Composition 26 Interpretation of Results for South Sudan Corridor 29 4. Legal and Regulatory Framework 33 Overview of Legal System 33 National Transport Policy 36 Transport Legal and Regulatory Framework Analysis 40 Customs and Taxation: Legal and Regulatory Framework Analysis 53 5.
    [Show full text]
  • LC SS 706 A1 EEQ 20130301.Pdf
    pp p ! ! p ! p (! ! !( 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E Gwalla Awan KolnyangAluk Katanich Titong Munini Beru ! R . K Wowa ang en Logoda N Rigl Chilimun N " " 0 0 p' Bor South County ' 0 Pibor County Lowelli Katchikan River Bellel Kichepo 0 ° Maktiweng J O N G L E I ° 6 Kaigo 6 Lochiret R. Naro Kenamuke Swamp R Ngechele . S Neria u p Kanopir Natibok Kabalatigo i r i ( B Moru Kimod a Rongada h r Yebisak e g l- n Tombi J o e b b l Shogle e a l) Buka h C . Gwojo-Adung Kassangor R Baro ! E T H I O P I A Moru Kerri KURON Kuron Gigging p Bojo-Ajut Gemmaiza ! Karn Ethi Kerkeng Moru Ethi Nakadocwa Poko Wani Terekeka County Kobowen Swamp Borichadi Bokuna Poko Kassengo Selemani Pagar Nabwel Wani Mika Chabong Tukara C E N T R A L p River Nakua p Kenyi E Q U A T O R I A Moru Angbin Mukajo Gali Owiyabong Kursomba Lotimor Bulu Koli Kalaruz Awakot Katima Waha ! Akitukomoi River Gera Tumu Nanyangachor Nyabongi Napalap ! Namoropus Natilup Swamp ) it Wanyang Kangitabok Lomokori le Eyata Moru Kolinyagkopil il ! Terakeka ri Lozut Lomongole t iti o (! S L Magara p R. ( n Umm Gura Mwanyakapin a p y l Abuilingakine Lomareng Plateau a Dogora R Ngigalingatun k o . L Jelli L o p Rambo Djie Navi . Lokodopotok Nyaginei Kangeleng p R Biyara Nai A o Kworijik Kangibun Lomuleye Katirima t o Simsima Badigeru Swamp River Lokuja Losagam k Musha Lukwatuk Pass Doinyoro East p o p l Balala Legeri Buboli Kalopedet Pongo River Lokorowa Watha Peth Hills Bume E A S T E R N E Q U A T O R I A Lokidangoai Nawitapal Lopokori Lokomarukest Kolobeleng Yakara Dogatwan Nomogonjet Kagethi ! Mogos Bala Pool Lapon County Lotakawa Kanyabu Moru Ethi Donyiro West Donyiro Cliff Kedowa Kothokan a l l i Chokagiling t Karakamuge o Mangalla Bwoda L Mediket Kaliapus Nyangatom !( .
    [Show full text]
  • Project Information Document (Pid) Concept Stage
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: PIDC446 Public Disclosure Authorized Project Name South Sudan- Eastern Africa Regional Transport , Trade and Development Facilitation Program (Phase One) (P131426) Region AFRICA Public Disclosure Copy Country Africa Sector(s) Rural and Inter-Urban Roads and Highways (60%), Public administration- Transportation (20%), General industry and trade sector (20%) Theme(s) Trade facilitation and market access (70%), Regional integration (30%) Lending Instrument Investment Project Financing Project ID P131426 Borrower(s) Ministry of Finance, Commerce and Economic Planning, Ministry of Public Disclosure Authorized Finance Implementing Agency Ministry of Transport, Roads and Bridges, Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure Environmental B-Partial Assessment Category Date PID Prepared/ 29-Aug-2013 Updated Date PID Approved/ 03-Sep-2013 Disclosed Estimated Date of 30-Sep-2013 Appraisal Completion Public Disclosure Authorized Estimated Date of 30-Jan-2014 Board Approval Concept Review Track II - The review did authorize the preparation to continue Public Disclosure Copy Decision I. Introduction and Context Country Context Deepening regional integration – economic opportunity for South Sudan & neighbors 1. The countries in the Eastern Africa sub-region, including Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Burundi, Rwanda, Ethiopia, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and South Sudan recorded an average annual economic growth rate of about 5 percent over the last decade. The sub- Public Disclosure Authorized
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities
    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
    [Show full text]