Shareholder Update October 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shareholder Update October 2018 Capital Markets Day 2nd November 2018 Agenda 08.30 Registration and Breakfast 09.00 Opening remarks Antonio Vázquez IAG Chairman Willie Walsh IAG CEO 09.10 Investment case Robert Boyle IAG Director of Strategy 10.00 LEVEL Vincent Hodder LEVEL CEO 10.30 Vueling Javier Sánchez-Prieto Vueling Chairman & CEO 10.50 Aer Lingus Stephen Kavanagh Aer Lingus CEO 11.10 Coffee Break 11.40 Iberia Luis Gallego Iberia Chairman & CEO 12.00 British Airways Alex Cruz BA Chairman & CEO Robert Boyle IAG Director of Strategy 12.30 IAG Digital Lynne Embleton IAG Cargo CEO 13.00 Lunch 13.50 Financial investment case Enrique Dupuy IAG CFO 14.30 Conclusion and Q&A Willie Walsh IAG CEO 15.30 Drinks Reception 2 Investment case Willie Walsh – IAG CEO Robert Boyle – IAG Director of Strategy The IAG investment case A unique structure that drives growth and innovation to generate superior shareholder returns Unique structure RoIC Sustainable EPS growth Portfolio of world- profitability class brands Margin Total Global leadership shareholder Ordinary dividend positions returns Organic Cost efficiency Accretive growth Share buyback Inorganic Innovation 4 The IAG investment case A unique structure that drives growth and innovation to generate superior shareholder returns • Disciplined capital allocation • Active portfolio management approach Unique structure • Flexibility and rapid decision making • Platform with centralised functions to enable scale and plug & play • Operationally focused companies Portfolio of world- • Distinct brands class brands • Diversified customer base • Complementary networks Global leadership • Leading the consolidation of the airline sector positions • Barcelona, Dublin, London, Madrid • North Atlantic, South Atlantic, and intra-Europe Cost efficiency • 11.7% reduction in CASK ex-fuel at constant currency since IAG’s founding in 2011 • c.4% further reduction targeted by 2022 • Dynamic and creative culture Innovation • At the forefront of digital innovation in the airline industry • Digital platform to grow revenues streams, enhance customer loyalty and drive cost efficiencies 5 Setting the scene – IAG a strong player in a growth business Willie Walsh – IAG CEO Reasons to be optimistic about the industry potential Time Period Industry Net Profit Passenger Growth 1947 2009 -$13bn +9.2% Industry Net Profit CAGR 63 years 2010 2017 +$183bn +6.0% Industry Net Profit CAGR 8 years Source: ICAO 7 Structural changes driving the optimism • Gradual erosion of protectionism in more developed markets • Restructured labour agreements • Improvements in technology e.g. direct distribution • Industry finding inventive ways to capture value - Different business models - Ancillary products • Airlines executives focused on managing for value • Industry consolidation 8 Domestic US has seen significant consolidation in recent times… Domestic United States Intra Europe Top 5 Carriers by capacity seat share in 2018 Top 5 Carriers by capacity seat share in 2018 86% of total market of 957 million seats 63% of total market of 929 million seats 22% 16% 21% 15% 14% 37% Other Other 12% 21% 11% 16% 9% 5% Source: OAG departing seats in 2018; Europe excluding Russia and Turkey 9 …with the European short haul market also consolidating 63% of the European short-haul market is represented by 5 airline groups - a c.20ppt increase since 2008 Other Intra Europe capacity, today’s 5 largest airline groups Lufthansa, Ryanair, IAG, easyJet, AF/KLM Available seats to and from European airports (millions) 929 +2% CAGR 888 837 775 734 725 734 724 723 743 37% 696 39% 39% 40% 42% 49% 46% 42% 57% 53% 53% 63% 61% 61% 58% 60% 51% 54% 58% 43% 47% 47% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Source: OAG. Europe excluding Russia and Turkey. Note: IB is not included in the group of 5 until the creation of IAG. Date and airline acquired: 10 2009 Austrian, 2011 IAG creation, 2013 Vueling, 2015 Aer Lingus, 2016 Brussels Airlines Long-haul consolidation driven mainly by joint ventures Capacity share for long haul flights departing Europe (One-way Available Seat Kilometres) Big 3 non JB capacity Big 3 JB capacity Big 3 Middle Eastern Carriers 989bn Other +3.8% CAGR 39% More liberalised markets have 680bn experienced deeper co-operation through the form of commercial joint ventures 9% where co-operation extends beyond 62% 19% normal alliance activity 1% 4% 33% 33% 2008 2018 Source: Estimated from OAG and company press releases 11 Track record of successful and consistent inorganic growth IAG bmi Vueling Aer Lingus Monarch slot formed acquisition acquisition acquisition purchase 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 First full year of Siberian joint Finnair join Finnair join Atlantic QATAR joint LATAM joint Atlantic Joint business formed Siberian Joint Business business formed business approved Business with JAL Joint Business Note: Year represents the year the deal was completed 12 Unique structure Willie Walsh – IAG CEO IAG’s unique operating model Corporate Parent Airline Operating Companies Full Service Value Low cost Platform of common services MRO / Fleet Digital IAG Connect 14 Clear areas of focus Corporate Airline Operating Parent Company Define product strategy for target Sets the long term vision for the Group customer segments vs Defines portfolio attractiveness and Deep and real-time understanding of makes capital allocation decisions competitive environment Exerts vertical and horizontal influence Standalone profit centres and across the Group independent credit identities Individual brand, cultural identity and management teams 15 Fit for purpose corporate parent IAG is managed from one floor plate of office space in BAs Head Office at Waterside Group Four core corporate parent activities Finance Group Strategy 1. Group Strategy, including digital 2. Group Finance 3. General Counsel Chief of Staff 4. Chief of Staff Digital Open floor plan for all corporate parent staff Group CEOs desk IAG Management Committee includes CEOs of largest operating companies General Counsel 16 IAG’s Management Committee IAG IAG IAG Iberia Vueling GC CFO CEO CEO CEO Aer Lingus • Weekly meetings CEO • Headed by the Group CEO • Comprised of the airline and platform CEOs and IAG’s senior management (CFO, Chief of Staff, Director of Strategy and IAG DoS General Counsel) IAG AVIOS BA GBS CARGO IAG CEO CEO CEO CoS CEO 17 Unique set of competitive advantages PARENT A PORTFOLIO MANAGER WITH A ROBUST STRUCTURAL NEUTRALITY ‘FEEL FOR THE BUSINESS’ POSITIONING Independence of corporate parent from IAG understands the critical success factors in Balance sheet strength combined with operating companies enables flexible, the airline business – able to judge suitable competitive cost base, provide platform to rapid and dispassionate decision making targets and performance levels and react deliver value throughout the cycle sensitively to issues that arise ATTRACTIVE PORTFOLIO OF GEOGRAPHICALLY ‘PLUG AND BUSINESSES COMPLEMENTARY HUBS PLAY MODEL’ Good combination of profitable businesses Each hub has a clearly defined role in the Model allows value to be created quickly from each with attractive and distinct market total IAG system, underpinned by a large inorganic plays. Alternatively, ideas can be positioning. Diversified exposure to mature local market developed at the centre and leveraged at and fast growing segments of the industry scale across the wider group 18 • Track record of value creation • Rapid decision making in Action • ‘Plug and Play’ platform A series of case studies • Integrated business planning process 19 Track record of value creation IAG’s Return on Invested Capital €856m 16.1% 16.0% Synergy delivery Total annual reported synergies as of 2015 achieved from 13.6% the BA and IB merger 12.7% Commitment to c.21% make tough choices Reduction in Iberia’s average 7.9% headcount since 2012 5.3% Vueling 5.6 ppt 3.5% Margin expansion post acquisition Aer Lingus 9.1 ppt Operating margin growth 0.1% post acquisition by IAG (vs. year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTM prior to acquisition) Sept 18 20 Rapid decision making The launch of LEVEL < 9 months from final recommendation to launch 4 x A321 based in Vienna December 2016 < 4 months from endorsement of business Brand agencies plan and LEVEL brand to first flight engaged to develop 2 x A330-200 based in Paris Orly new brand < 1 month from endorsement of business plan and brand to 2 x A330-200 based in Barcelona 3 x A330-200 based in Barcelona selling flights September 2016 23 February 2017 17 March May 2017 June 2017 28 June 2018 July 2018 IAG Board endorses IAG Board endorses 2017 IAG Board LEVEL flights LEVEL branded LEVEL flights recommendation to recommendation to LEVEL flights endorses launch from short-haul launch from progress analysis and launch NGLC from go on sale recommendati Barcelona flights Paris (long launch NGLC from Barcelona under new on to pursue from Vienna go haul) Summer 2017 brand, operated by Paris as on sale and Vienna Iberia second base (short haul) Notes: NGLC - “Next Generation Low Cost Carrier” 21 Plug and Play platform MRO / Fleet Digital IAG Connect Established 2011 2011 2011 2013 2014 2016 Improving the In-flight The Group Reward currency • IT Retailing IAG’s competitiveness of Setting the digital connectivity service used to underpin • Procurement cargo capacity IAG’s maintenance strategy for IAG strategy and roll- OpCo FFPs • Finance Ops provider for: activities out Synergies can be quickly realised by removing duplication of activities from acquired carriers in addition to the scale effects of added
Recommended publications
  • How to Get to the Galapagos Islands
    Specialist Galapagos Trip Advisors Lowest Price Guaranteed #1 Online Seller of Galapagos Tours Free Trip Planning Special Oers ARRIVING FROM EUROPE Carriers: KLM, LUFTHANSA, IBERIA, LAN, AVIANCA, AIR FRANCE, How to Get to the BRITISH AIRWAYS, AMERICAN AIRLINES, UNITED-CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, DELTA Routes: From local airport connecting in Madrid or Amsterdam directly or other European city connecting to the US. Galapagos Islands Possible stops in Central or South America ARRIVING FROM JAPAN, CHINA & REST OF ASIA Carriers: KLM, LUFTHANSA, ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, AIR CHINA, JAPAN AIRLINES, AMERICAN AIRLINES, UNITED-CONTINENTAL ARRIVING FROM THE UNITED STATES & CANADA AIRLINES, DELTA Carriers: AMERICAN AIRLINES, UNITED-CONTINENTAL AIRLINES , Routes: DELTA, COPA, AIR CANADA, LAN, AVIANCA, AEROMEXICO, TAME From Beijing connecting in Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles, Routes: Local airport-connecting ight in Atlanta, Houston, Frankfurt, or Tokyo. Miami or New York-Quito. From Tokyo connecting in Amsterdam, Atlanta, Dallas, Possible stops in Central or South America Houston, Washington. Possible stops in Central or South America. ARRIVING FROM AFRICA Carriers: KLM, AIR FRANCE, SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS, IBERIA Routes: From your nearby international airport connecting to a major international airport in Europe or Brazil. Possible stop in South America. ARRIVING FROM AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND ARRIVING FROM INDIA OR THE MIDDLE EAST Carriers: QUANTAS, LAN, AIR NEW ZEALAND, AMERICAN Carriers: KLM, LUFTHANSA, AIR FRANCE, AIR INDIA, IBERIA, DELTA, AIRLINES, UNITED-CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, DELTA EGYPTAIR, EMIRATES, AMERICAN AIRLINES, UNITED-CONTINENTAL Routes: From Sydney or Auckland connecting in Chicago, AIRLINES San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, or Santiago (Chile). Routes: From your nearby international airport connecting to a Possible stops in North or South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2017
    WHITE PAPER SEPTEMBER 2018 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2017 Brandon Graver, Ph.D., and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Tim Johnson, Andrew Murphy, Anastasia Kharina, and Amy Smorodin for their review and support. We also acknowledge Airline Data Inc. for providing processed BTS data, and FlightGlobal for Ascend Fleet data. This study was funded through the generous support of the Bekenstein Foundation. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2018 International Council on Clean Transportation TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Fuel burn modeling..........................................................................................................................5 2.3 Fuel efficiency calculation ............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Openskies: an R Package to Retrieve, Analyze And
    Package ‘openSkies’ August 23, 2021 Type Package Title Retrieval, Analysis and Visualization of Air Traffic Data Version 1.1.4 Date 2021-08-14 Author Rafael Ayala, Daniel Ayala, David Ruiz, Aleix Sellés, Lara Sellés Vidal Maintainer Rafael Ayala <[email protected]> Description Provides functionalities and data structures to retrieve, analyze and visualize aviation data. It includes a client interface to the 'OpenSky' API <https: //opensky-network.org>. It allows retrieval of flight information, as well as aircraft state vectors. Acknowledgements The development of this software is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant code PID2019-105471RB-I00) and the Regional Government of Andalusia (grant code P18-RT-1060). License CC BY-NC 4.0 Depends grid Imports httr, ssh, xml2, ggmap, ggplot2, magick, utils, stats, R6, dbscan, cluster Suggests knitr, BiocStyle, RUnit, BiocGenerics, rmarkdown, markdown VignetteBuilder knitr BugReports https://github.com/Rafael-Ayala/openSkies/issues NeedsCompilation no Encoding UTF-8 Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-08-23 07:50:06 UTC R topics documented: ADSBDecoder . .2 clusterRoutes . .3 1 2 ADSBDecoder getAircraftFlights . .5 getAircraftMetadata . .7 getAircraftStateVectorsSeries . .8 getAirportArrivals . .9 getAirportDepartures . 11 getAirportMetadata . 13 getIntervalFlights . 14 getIntervalStateVectors . 15 getRouteMetadata . 17 getSingleTimeStateVectors . 18 getVectorSetFeatures . 20 getVectorSetListFeatures . 21 openSkiesAircraft . 23 openSkiesAirport . 24 openSkiesFlight . 25 openSkiesRoute . 26 openSkiesStateVector . 27 openSkiesStateVectorSet . 28 plotPlanes . 30 plotRoute . 31 plotRoutes . 32 Index 34 ADSBDecoder An object of class adsbDecoder object representing a decoder used to decode ADS-B v2 messages Description R6Class object of class adsbDecoder representing a decoder used to decode ADS-B v2 messages. Provides methods for decoding a single message or a batch.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Options to Marseille
    (Some of the) Flight options to Marseille Most of the search was done for flights on the 15th and 17th May. The lines in light red are for other dates. This list is obviously non exhaustive, as there are always many options available, but it gives some indications and suggestions. From Barcelona 15/5 15.50-17.00 Iberia / Vueling To Barcelona 17/5 22.20-23.30 Vueling 17/5 22.15-23.20 Iberia From Rome FCO 15/5 15.30-16.55 Alitalia 15/5 17.15-18.50 Ryanair 15/5 14.40-16.10 Iberia / Vueling To Rome FCO 17/5 15.15-16.40 Ryanair 17/5 16.45-18.05 Vueling From Athens Via Rome (15/5) 13.25-16.55 Alitalia Via Munich (15/5) 13.10-17.10 Lufthansa Via Munich (15/5) 8.35-13.05 Lufthansa To Athens Via Munich (17/5) 6.30-12.20 Lufthansa Direct (18/5) 18.20-21.55 Aegean Airlines Via Rome (18/5) 17.45-00.45 Alitalia From Lisbon 15/5 14.00-17.20 Ryanair 15/5 8.10-11.25 Tap Air To Lisbon 17/5 17.45-19.10 Ryanair 17/5 12.05-13.25 Tap Air 17/5 18.25-19.50 Tap Air From Tunis 15/5 7.25-10.00 Tunisair 15/5 12.25-15.00 Tunisair 15/5 17.15-19.50 Tunisair 15/5 19.20-21.55 NouvelAir Tunisie To Tunis 17/5 21.50-22.20 Tunisair 17/5 15.50-16.25 Tunisair 18/5 10.50-11.25 Tunisair 18/5 Many other flights From Madrid 15/5 10.20-12.00 Iberia 15/5 16.50-18.30 Iberia 15/5 21.30-23.10 Iberia To Madrid 17/5 15.20-17.10 Ryanair 17/5 19.00-20.50 Iberia 18/5 13.55-15.45 Ryanair 18/5 12.30-14.20 Iberia From Milan 15/5 8.35-9.45 Twinjet 15/5 20.25-21.35 Twinjet 15/5 Several one stop flights To Milan 17/5 20.25-21.35 Twinjet 18/5 via Lyon 7.40-10.30 Air France 18/5 via Paris 6.00-9.50
    [Show full text]
  • British Airways Response
    From: British Airways Customer Relations <[email protected]> Date: 17 April 2015 at 10:49 Subject: Your Response from BA Customer Relations To: [email protected] **Please DO NOT reply directly to this email by using the ‘reply’ function on your personal email settings, as it WILL NOT be received. If you wish to send us a reply please use the link at the bottom of the email** Dear Mr Dial Thank you for your letter dated 26 March addressed to Silla Maizey and the Executive Chairman, Keith Williams about been downgraded on flight BA0191 on 13 March. Keith has asked me to reply to you on his behalf and so this is not a standard email. I apologise on behalf of British Airways for not contacting you proactively about this matter and for the delay in my personal response. I see from your booking that you purchased the ticket to Austin on 04 November 2014 through you travel agent Opodo. I completely understand your frustration at booking this ticket so far in advance and arriving at the airport to find you've been downgraded from the Club World cabin. I hope our staff explained that there are occasions where our customers make a booking and then don’t turn up for their flight. We, along with other airlines, have an overbooking policy, which helps us avoid flying with empty seats and means we can keep the cost of our fares down. Ultimately this means we can fly a lot more passengers to their destinations. We collect data about how many people don’t turn up for each flight and we use this information to tell us if we should book more passengers than there are seats.
    [Show full text]
  • IAG Results Presentation
    IAG results presentation Full Year 2019 28 February 2020 2019 Highlights Willie Walsh, Chief Executive Officer Continued progress against strategic objectives FY 2019 strategic highlights • Strengthen portfolio of world-class brands and operations − Announced planned acquisition of Air Europa, subject to regulatory approvals − British Airways new Club Suite on 5 aircraft (4 A350s, 1 B777) and in-flight product enhancements (amenities, catering, new World Traveller Plus seat, Wi-Fi rollout. Revamped lounges – Geneva, Johannesburg, Milan, New York JFK, SFO − Iberia Madrid lounge refurbishment and completion of premium economy long-haul rollout − Strong NPS increase by 9.5 points to 25.8, driven by British Airways and Vueling, target of 33 by 2022 − LEVEL expansion at Barcelona and roll-out to Amsterdam • Grow global leadership positions − North America traffic (RPK) growth of 3.6% − New destinations – Charleston (BA), Minneapolis (Aer Lingus), Pittsburgh (BA) − LEVEL – new route Barcelona to New York − Latin America and Caribbean traffic growth of 15.6% − Iberia - higher frequencies on existing routes − LEVEL – new route Barcelona to Santiago − British Airways – increased economy seating ex-LGW on Caribbean routes − Intra-Europe traffic growth of 3.8% - Domestic +10.1% (mainly Spain), Europe +2.2% − Asia traffic growth of 5.0% – British Airways new routes to Islamabad and Osaka, signed joint business agreement with China Southern Airlines • Enhance IAG’s common integrated platforms − Launched ‘Flightpath net zero’ carbon emissions by 2050
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Analysis of Airline Business Model Convergence
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Daft, Jost; Albers, Sascha Working Paper An empirical analysis of airline business model convergence Working Paper, No. 112 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Cologne, Department of Business Policy and Logistics Suggested Citation: Daft, Jost; Albers, Sascha (2014) : An empirical analysis of airline business model convergence, Working Paper, No. 112, University of Cologne, Department of Business Policy and Logistics, Cologne This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/105064 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2014 Irene Kwan and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D
    NOVEMBER 2015 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2014 IRENE KWAN AND DANIEL RUTHERFORD, PH.D. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Anastasia Kharina, Xiaoli Mao, Guozhen Li, Bill Hem- mings, Vera Pardee, Benjamin Jullien, Tim Johnson, and Dimitri Simos for their review of this document and overall support for the project. We would also like to thank Professor Bo Zou (University of Illinois at Chicago) for his contribution to statistical analyses included in the report. This study was funded through the generous support of the Oak and ClimateWorks Foundations. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org © 2015 International Council on Clean Transportation TaBLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Fuel burn modeling .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Integration Between U.S. Airways and Iberia in One World José G
    lobal f G E o co l n a o n m r u i c o s J $ Vargas-Hernández, J Glob Econ 2014, 2:4 Journal of Global Economics DOI: 10.4172/2375-4389.1000123 ISSN: 2375-4389 Opinion Article Open Access Strategic Integration between U.S. Airways and Iberia in One World José G. Vargas-Hernández* University Center of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Zapopan , Jalisco, Mexico *Corresponding author: José G. Vargas-Hernández, University Center of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Zapopan , Jalisco, Mexico, Tel: +523337703340, Ext: 25685; E-mail: [email protected] Rec Date: Sep 30 2014; Acc Date: Oct 08 2014; Pub Date: Oct 15 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Vargas-Hernández JG. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The air transportation is one of the most important international industries; there are three major networks or strategic alliances (One World, Sky Team and Star Alliance). They seek to overcome each other, whilst the members leave the guild and join another. This paper attempts to determine the reasons for the performance of the joint venture and the performance of firms within the alliance. Keywords: Airlines; Antitrust; Firm performance; Strategic alliances Defining the Problem The question of this work lies in what effect on firm performance Introduction could be expected from the strategic partnership between U.S. Strategic alliances between firms are ubiquitous phenomena. Airways, Iberia, American Airlines and British Airways? Strategic alliances are defined as voluntary arrangements between firms involving exchange, sharing or co-development of products, Theoretical Background technology or services [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.2672 - SAS / SPANAIR
    EN Case No COMP/M.2672 - SAS / SPANAIR Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/03/2002 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 302M2672 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 05/03/2002 SG (2002) D/228776 In the published version of this decision, some PUBLIC VERSION information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a MERGER PROCEDURE general description. ARTICLE 6-1(b) DECISION To the notifying party Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No COMP/M.2672 - SAS/Spanair Notification of 4.2.2002 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/89 1. On 4.2.2002, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/891 (“The Merger Regulation) by which the undertaking Scandanavian Airlines Systems Denmark-Norway- Sweden (SAS) proposes to acquire sole control of Spanair Holding S.L (Spanair) within the meaning of article 3 (1) (b) of the aforementioned Council Regulation, through a purchase of shares. 2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Loads Data for the Boeing 777-200 Aircraft in Commercial
    DOT/FAA/AR-06/11 Statistical Loads Data for the Office of Aviation Research and Development Boeing 777-200ER Aircraft in Washington, DC 20591 Commercial Operations November 2006 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer's names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. This document does not constitute FAA certification policy. Consult your local FAA aircraft certification office as to its use. This report is available at the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center's Full-Text Technical Reports page: actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF). Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/AR-06/11 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date STATISTICAL LOADS DATA FOR THE BOEING 777-200ER AIRCRAFT IN November 2006 COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Daniel O. Tipps, Donald A. Skinn, John W. Rustenburg, Todd Jones, and UDR-TR-2005-00106 David A. Harris 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Dayton Research Institute 065110 RPD-510 RD0300 Structural Integrity Division 11.
    [Show full text]