DOCSLIB.ORG

School Districts Revenue Bonds Financing Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
School Districts Revenue Bonds Financing Program NEW ISSUE (See “RATINGS” herein) $211,225,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICTS REVENUE BOND FINANCING PROGRAM REVENUE BONDS $80,505,000 $41,870,000 $37,010,000 SERIES 2016E SERIES 2016F SERIES 2016G $22,725,000 $10,140,000 $18,975,000 SERIES 2016H SERIES 2016I SERIES 2016J Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover Payment and Security: The School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2016E (the “Series 2016E Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2016F (the “Series 2016F Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2016G (the “Series 2016G Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2016H (the “Series 2016H Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2016I (the “Series 2016I Bonds”) and the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2016J (the “Series 2016J Bonds” and, together with the Series 2016E Bonds, the Series 2016F Bonds, the Series 2016G Bonds, the Series 2016H Bonds and the Series 2016I Bonds, the “Series 2016 Bonds”), will be special obligations of the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (“DASNY”), payable solely from and secured by a pledge of payments to be made by the applicable School Districts described in Appendix B hereto (collectively, the “School Districts”) in the State of New York (the “State”) pursuant to the applicable Financing Agreements (each, an “Agreement” and collectively, the “Agreements”), dated as of April 13, 2016, between DASNY and such School Districts, and all funds and accounts (except the Arbitrage Rebate Fund) authorized under DASNY’s Master School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bond Resolution adopted May 29, 2002, as amended and supplemented (the “Master Resolution”), and established by DASNY’s Series Resolutions, adopted April 13, 2016, authorizing such Series (individually, the “Series 2016E Resolution,” the “Series 2016F Resolution,” the “Series 2016G Resolution,” the “Series 2016H Resolution,” the “Series 2016I Resolution” and the “Series 2016J Resolution” and, together, the “Series 2016 Resolutions”). The Master Resolution and the Series 2016 Resolutions are herein collectively referred to as the “Resolutions.” None of the funds and accounts established under a Series Resolution to secure a Series of Bonds shall secure any other Series of Bonds. There is no debt service reserve fund securing the Series 2016 Bonds and no real property of any School District secures the Series 2016 Bonds. Each School District is required under its respective Agreement to deliver its general obligation bonds (the “School District Bonds”) to DASNY to evidence its obligation to repay the loan (the “Loan”) to be made by DASNY to the School District from proceeds of the Series 2016 Bonds relating to such Agreement. The principal and redemption price of and interest on the School District Bonds (“Loan Repayments”) are scheduled to be sufficient to repay, when due, the principal and redemption price of and interest on the Loan. Each School District is also required under its respective Agreement to pay such amounts as are required to be paid under such Agreement, including the fees and expenses of DASNY and U.S. Bank National Association, New York, New York, as trustee and paying agent (the “Trustee” and the “Paying Agent”). To secure its payment of all amounts due under its Agreement, each School District under its Agreement has assigned and pledged to DASNY a sufficient portion of public funds apportioned or otherwise made payable by the State to such School District (the “Pledged Revenues”). Each School District has directed and acknowledged that the Pledged Revenues are to be paid directly to the Trustee pursuant to an assignment by DASNY as provided in the Act (as defined herein) and the Memorandum of Understanding among DASNY, the Comptroller of the State and the Commissioner of Education of the State upon the occurrence of certain events of default under its respective Agreement. Each Series of the Series 2016 Bonds will be separately secured by the pledge and assignment to the Trustee of the payments to be made by each School District to DASNY under its respective Agreement and on the School District Bonds and DASNY’s interest in the Pledged Revenues pledged and assigned to DASNY under the Agreements. Each School District will pledge its full faith and credit to the payment of the principal of and interest on the School District Bonds it delivers to DASNY and has the power and is required under State statutes to levy and collect ad valorem taxes on all taxable real property within the School District for such payment. No School District is obligated to make payments on behalf of any other School District nor are the Pledged Revenues of any School District pledged to secure the obligation of any other School District. A default by any School District could cause a default on the applicable Series of the Series 2016 Bonds. See “PART 2 – SOURCES OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2016 BONDS.” The Series 2016 Bonds will not be a debt of the State nor will the State be liable thereon. DASNY has no taxing power. Bond Insurance: The scheduled payment of principal of and interest on certain maturities of certain Series of the Series 2016 Bonds as set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement (collectively, the “Insured Bonds”) when due will be guaranteed by a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued concurrently with the delivery of the Insured Bonds by Build America Mutual Assurance Company (“BAM”) or Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. (“AGM”), as applicable. Description: The Series 2016 Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Interest on the Series 2016 Bonds (due each April 1 and October 1, commencing April 1, 2017 with respect to the Series 2016E Bonds, the Series 2016F Bonds, the Series 2016G Bonds and the Series 2016H Bonds and October 1, 2017 with respect to the Series 2016I Bonds and the Series 2016J Bonds) will be payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owners of the Series 2016 Bonds at their addresses as shown on the registration books held by the Trustee or, at the option of a registered owner of at least $1,000,000 in principal amount of the Series 2016 Bonds, by wire transfer to the wire transfer address within the continental United States to which the registered owner has instructed the Trustee to make such payment at least five (5) days prior to the fifteenth (15th) day of the month next preceding an interest payment date. The principal and Redemption Price of the Series 2016 Bonds will be payable at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee and Paying Agent or, with respect to Redemption Price, at the option of a registered owner of at least $1,000,000 in principal amount of the Series 2016 Bonds, by wire transfer to the owner of such Series of Series 2016 Bonds as more fully described herein. The Series 2016 Bonds will be issued initially under a Book-Entry Only System, registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Individual purchases of beneficial interests in the Series 2016 Bonds will be made in Book-Entry form without certificates. So long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner of the Series 2016 Bonds, payments of the principal of and interest on such Series of Series 2016 Bonds will be made directly to DTC or its nominee. Disbursement of such payments to DTC participants is the responsibility of DTC and disbursement of such payments to the beneficial owners is the responsibility of DTC participants. See “PART 3 – THE SERIES 2016 BONDS – Book-Entry Only System” herein. Redemption: The Series 2016 Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as more fully described herein. Tax Exemption: In the opinion of Barclay Damon, LLP, Co-Bond Counsel to DASNY, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and court decisions and assuming compliance with the covenants herein and the accuracy of certain representations by DASNY and the School Districts (and their successors), interest on the Series 2016 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Barclay Damon, LLP is also of the opinion that interest on the Series 2016 Bonds is not an “item of tax preference” for purposes of the individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes imposed under the Code; provided, however, that interest on the Series 2016 Bonds owned by corporations will be included in the calculation of adjusted current earnings, a portion of which is an adjustment to corporate alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations. Barclay Damon, LLP and Marous Law Group, P.C., as Co-Bond Counsel, are further of the opinion that interest on the Series 2016 Bonds is exempt under existing laws from personal income taxes imposed by the State of New York and its political subdivisions (including The City of New York). See “PART 10 – TAX MATTERS” herein regarding certain other tax considerations. The Series 2016 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriters. The offer of the Series 2016 Bonds may be subject to prior sale or may be withdrawn or modified at any time without notice. The offer is subject to the approval of legality by Barclay Damon, LLP, Albany, New York, and Marous Law Group, P.C., New York, New York, Co-Bond Counsel to DASNY, and to certain other conditions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 9.29: Town of Waterford
    SECTION 9.29: TOWN OF WATERFORD 9.29 TOWN OF WATERFORD This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Waterford. A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Paul McInerney/Dispatcher Supervisor Harry Martel/Highway Superintendent 65 Broad St., Waterford NY 12188 35 South St., Waterford NY 12188 (518) 237-3341 (518) 376-1678 [email protected] [email protected] B.) TOWN PROFILE Population 8,573 (estimated 2007 U.S. Census) Location The Town of Waterford, formed on April 17, 1816, is located in the southeastern corner of Saratoga County, north of the City of Troy. Its area is the smallest of any of the twenty towns in the county, being but seven square miles. It is bounded on the north by Halfmoon, on the east by the Hudson River and on the south and west by the Mohawk River. The Town of Waterford contains a village, also called Waterford. The east town line, defined by the Hudson River, is the border of Rensselaer County, and the south town line, defined by the Mohawk River, is the border of Albany County. The easternmost section and locks of the Erie Canal, which connects with the Hudson River pass through the town. The "Waterford flight" of locks is one of the highest in the world. The Erie Canal is linked to the Champlain Canal at Waterford. US Route 4, partly conjoined with New York State Route 32, is a north-south highway through eastern Waterford. According to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement Preservation Program 2015-2016 Project Solicitation
    Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council Pavement Preservation Program 2015‐2016 Project Solicitation Introduction The Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Planning and Programming Area that includes Warren County, Washington County, and the Town of Moreau and Village of South Glens Falls In Saratoga County. MPOs are responsible for administering a cooperative and continuing regional transportation planning process. A principal component of that process is capital programming for federally‐ funded transportation improvement projects. A/GFTC is seeking project candidates for its Pavement Preservation Program. This program consists of annual funding setasides dedicated for maintenance and preservation projects intended to prevent the deterioration of roadways that are presently in good to fair condition. The intent of the program is to encourage municipalities to actively engage in preventative maintenance strategies that reduce the need for more costly infrastructure replacement and major rehabilitation projects. Programming Levels A/GFTC has programmed $1,591,000 in matched federal Surface Transportation Program funds for pavement preservation projects that are to be obligated during Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2015‐2016. Additionally, $164,000 in matched funds has been programmed for FFY 2014‐2015 for any required design associated with the selected projects. A local match of 20% is required in order to access design and construction funds. The potential availability of Marchiselli funding, a State program that covers 75% of the required local match for federal aid transportation projects, could reduce the required local match to 5% of the overall project cost. Eligible Roadways All projects must be sponsored by a local municipality (Village, City, Town or County).
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Northumberland This Section Presents the Jurisdictional Annex for the Town of Northumberland
    9.19 Town of Northumberland This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Northumberland. The town provided the following updates that were incorporated into this annex: . Jurisdictional Annex Update Form (Contact Information, Profile, and Capability Assessment) . Hazard Ranking . NYS Mitigation Action Worksheets 9.19.1 Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Richard E. Colozza Highway Super. 17 Catherine St.; Gansevoort, NY 12831 42 Leonard St.; Gansevoort, NY 12831 (518) 792 – 9179, ext. 112 (518) 793 – 6901 [email protected] [email protected] 9.19.2 Town Profile Population 5,151 (American Community Survey 5-Year 2016 Estimates) Location The Town of Northumberland is the 4th oldest town in Saratoga County, located along the eastern border of the County. It is bounded on the north by Moreau, on the east by the county line, on the south by Saratoga, and on the west by Wilton. There are three small hamlets in Northumberland: Gansevoort, Bacon Hill and Northumberland. The east town line is the border of Washington County and is marked by the Hudson River. The principal streams are Beaver Dam Creek and Snook kill. The Champlain Canal crosses the extreme southeastern corner, and the Delaware & Hudson railroad crosses the northwestern corner. US Route 4 is a north-south highway by the Hudson River at the southeast corner of Northumberland. New York State Route 32 is a north- south highway that intersects New York State Route 50 at Gansevoort. US-4 and NY-32 are conjoined in Northumberland. According to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • August 23, 2013 Ms. Robin Dropkin, Executive Director Parks & Trails
    STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION ONE ALBANY, NY 12232 www.dot.ny.gov Sam Zhou, P.E. Joan McDonald ACTING REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER August 23, 2013 Ms. Robin Dropkin, Executive Director Parks & Trails New York 29 Elk Street Albany, NY 12207 518-434-1583 [email protected] Re: PIN 1460.42, Route 32 Over the Mohawk Bridge Project Comment letter dated August 20, 2013 Dear Ms. Dropkin: I received your comment letter in today’s mail. I’d like to thank you and your staff for the time and effort spent reviewing the proposed alternatives as outlined in the Draft Design Report and for your thoughtful and constructive comments. Your concerns are shared by the Capital District Transportation Committee and were expressed in a letter to me from their Executive Director Michael Franchini dated August 21, 2013. I’ve attached a copy of his letter for your information along with a copy of my response letter dated August 22, 2013. As I said to Mr. Franchini, different bicycling advocacy groups typically don’t agree on the best approach for accommodating bicyclists. Your letter and CDTC’s letter are a good example of this. As I explained in my response to CDTC, consistency is important, as is following current design requirements. Your proposal to establish dedicated and striped 5 foot wide bicycle lanes would meet current standards. It would also be ‘one step better’ than the currently proposed preferred 4.2 meter (14 foot) wide shared use travel lanes (as compared to the minimum required width for such lanes of 12 feet).
    [Show full text]
  • Newburgh Area Transportation & Land Use Study
    Newburgh Area Transportation & Land Use Study Short Term Transit Improvement Program Draft Service Alternatives Submitted to: Orange County Department of Planning Submitted by: Abrams-Cherwony Group October 2010 Newburgh Area Transportation and Land Use Study Short Term Transit Improvement Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Service Alternatives 3 Service Development Process 3 Service Planning Inputs 3 Planning Precepts 5 Service Alternatives 8 Local Service 8 Alternative 1A: Existing Local Routes 9 Alternative 1B: Operator Proposal 10 Alternative 2: Two Bus System 11 Alternative 3A: Three Bus System 13 Alternative 3B: Three Bus System 16 Alternative 4A: Four Bus System 18 Alternative 4B: Four Bus System 21 Newburgh-Beacon Shuttle 23 Alternative 5A: Existing Newburgh-Beacon Shuttle 24 Alternative 5B: Newburgh-Beacon Shuttle 25 Alternative 5C: Newburgh-Beacon Shuttle 26 Other Proposals 27 Summary 29 Draft Interim Report: Service Alternatives Page 1 Newburgh Area Transportation and Land Use Study Short Term Transit Improvement Program LIST OF FIGURES Page 1 Alternative 1A: Existing Local Routes 10 2 Alternative 1B: Operator Proposal 11 3 Alternative 2: Two Bus System 12 4 Alternative 3A: Three Bus System 14 5 Alternative 3A: Broadway Route 15 6 Alternative 3A: North-South Route 16 7 Alternative 3B: Three Bus System 17 8 Alternative 4A: Four Bus System 18 9 Alternative 4A: Broadway Route 19 10 Alternative 4A: St. Luke’s Cornwell Hospital to Mid-Valley Mall 20 11 Alternative 4A: Newburgh Community Route 21 12 Alternative 4B: Four
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Ave Back to Square One Page 12
    , e ht July 2, 1981 @25c ..Th e 5po ti19 v., xxv",. No" Graphic newsweekly serving the towns of Bethlehem, New Scotland, and nearby communities BETHLEHEM Delaware Ave back to square onePage 12 t- Summer at Elm St. Park VOORHEESVILLE , . Who owns . the sidewalks? Page 22 ____*,t . ___"-:'~-..=J RUSTPROOF SUMMER HOURS YfJ/J/! ~Il TfJ/JAY July 6th thru Labor Day I r :r~tli9ht ~NDAR ~fft KelAl Mon. - Fri. 8:30 A.M. - 6 P.M. ''sed Sat. 8:30 A.M. - 1 P.M. 11- CLOSED SUNDAYS Tn-Village FISH, 24-hour-a-day yoluntary service year 'round, ..,._ a. (CI d All D J I 4 h) offered by res;dents of Delmar. .Uc..-...... ose ay u y t Elsmere and SUngerlands to help ~8~EIN~~IC~[~S~TA~r~I~O~N~M=~~;I!~~;;;;~23~9=De51a~wa~re:A~ve:nu~e~,JGLENMONT 463-7712 Delmar. 439-8166 ~~~~3~~ghbors;nanyemergency. League of Women Volers meels ~ monthly at Bethlehem Library. SI>tn.oI MlSolhgnnwnls lhotl CAUSE NeJw PrpssurE' 9:15 a.m. Babysitting available. STOP SUFFERING!!! .In' dt'wrmirwd hy X ftlying IhE' Spirwo Information. 439-5786. with r\lt ,"I. ( I '-t,"",\H' '·HA'''' \\ III HI • ·\hl :"I Assemblyman Larry Lane'. (),~ lin 1:"Ii Ilr\! \ I~II I H.I I Of ( If·\ H( a ALLERGIES district office. 1 Becker Terr., Chiropractic has shown that many of Delmar. open Mondays 10-3. today's ailments are caused by "NERVE PRESSURE" • FULL. SPINAL EXAMINA nONS' • SPINAL BAUNCE TESTS 39 • SPINE GRAPHS • CHIROPRACnC SPINAL ADJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster County Fixed Route Public Transportation Coordination and Intermodal Opportunities Analysis
    DRAFT FINAL REPORT Ulster County Fixed Route Public Transportation Coordination and Intermodal Opportunities Analysis Prepared for Ulster County Transportation Council Prepared by Abrams-Cherwony & Associates Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Introduction 1 Existing Services 3 Overview of Carriers 3 Public Transportation Services in Ulster County 4 Coordination Between Services 9 Transportation Facilities 9 Ridership Information 11 Operating and Financial Trends 12 Service Area 14 Socioeconomic Characteristics 14 Transit Needs Score 16 Journey To Work Information 16 Stakeholder Interviews 21 Methodology 21 Findings and Results 22 Findings and Recommendations 30 Service 30 Kingston CitiBus 30 Ulster County Area Transit 31 Transportation Demand Management 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) CHAPTER PAGE Land Use and Design 35 Facilities 37 Terminals 37 Commuter Parking Lots 43 Costs 49 Fares 50 Prepayment Media 50 Fare Coordination 51 U-PASS 51 UniTicket 52 Promotional Fares 52 Marketing 52 Marketing Plan 52 Specific Elements 53 Priorities 54 LIST OF TABLES FOLLOWING TABLE PAGE (For the electronic version, all tables follow the text of the report.) 1 Description of Service - Transit Services 3 2 Description of Service - Commuter/Intercity Service 3 3 Frequency of Service - Transit Services 7 4 Frequency of Service - Commuter/Intercity Service 7 5 Frequency of Service - Transit Services 7 6 Frequency of Service - Commuter/Intercity Service 7 7 Daily Ridership By Route 11 8 Five Year Operating and Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Newburgh Area Transportation & Land Use Study
    Newburgh Area Transportation & Land Use Study May 2012 Newburgh Area Transportation & Land Use Study Prepared for the Orange County Transportation Council • Edward A. Diana, OCTC Chairman & County Executive • David Church, AICP, Commissioner of Planning • John Czamanske, AICP, Deputy Commissioner of Plan- ning, OCTC Staff Director, Study Project Manager OCTC Study Advisory Group Consultant Team • Town of Cornwall AKRF, Inc. • Village of Cornwall-on-Hudson • Village of Maybrook • Graham L. Trelstad, AICP, Project Manager • Richard Klusek, AICP, Deputy Project Manager • Town of Montgomery Abrams-Cherwony Group of Gannett Fleming • Village of Montgomery • Walter Cherwony • City of Newburgh • Joshua B. Diamond • Town of Newburgh Arch Street Communications, Inc. • Town of New Windsor • Cyd Averill, Public Outreach Lead • Village of Walden • Virginia Mold, Public Outreach Liaison • Metropolitan Transportation Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc. • New York State Department of Transportation • Brian ten Siethoff, AICP, Transportation Planning • New York State Thruway Authority • Shawn Pope, Transportation Simulation • Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates/VHB • Martin Taub, PE, Transportation Studies Director • Janet Jenkins, AICP, Transportation Planning Studies This report was prepared with funding provided through the Manager County of Orange, NY, as host agency of the Orange County • Amir Rizavi, PE, Senior Traffic Analyst Transportation Council using, in whole or in part, local and • Noah Bernstein, AICP, Senior Transportation Planning State matched Federal transportation planning funds. These Analyst funds are provided through grants to the State of New York from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Lochner Engineering, P.C. Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the • Mark Pawlick, PE, Vice President State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metro- • Kyle Snyder, EIT, Project Engineer politan Planning Program, Section 104(f )] of Title 23, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Stillwater This Section Presents the Jurisdictional Annex for the Town of Stillwater
    9.26 Town of Stillwater This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Stillwater. The town provided the following updates that were incorporated into this annex: . Hazard Ranking 9.26.1 Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Sue Cunningham, Town Clerk Edward Kinowski, Supervisor 881 Hudson Ave.; Stillwater, NY 12170 881 Hudson Ave.; Stillwater, NY 12170 [email protected] [email protected] (518) 664-6148 (518) 664-6148 9.26.2 Town Profile Population 8,436 (American Community Survey 5-Year 2016 Estimates) Location The Town of Stillwater is located in the eastern section of Saratoga County. It is bounded on the north by Saratoga, on the east by the county line, on the south by Halfmoon and on the west by Malta. Stillwater is the principal village. It is located near the center of the eastern border of the town on the bank of the Hudson River. Mechanicville is also partially located within the town. The east town line is the border of Rensselaer County and Washington County, marked by the Hudson River. US Route 4, partly conjoined with New York State Route 32, follows the Hudson River through the town. New York State Route 423 is an east-west highway in the northern part of Stillwater. New York State Route 9P is a north- south highway in the northwestern part of the town by Saratoga Lake. New York State Route 67 runs along the south town line. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the town has a total area of 43.6 square miles, with 41.4 square miles of it land and 2.2 square miles (5.07-percent) of its water.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornwall Comprehensive Plan Update Adopted March 13, 2012
    Town of Cornwall Comprehensive Development Plan Update 2011 With the Assistance of Garling Associates Community Planners 301 Main Street Goshen, New York (845) 294‐5835 Adopted by the Town of Cornwall Town Board March 13, 2012 Town of Cornwall Comprehensive Plan Update Adopted March 13, 2012 Town Board Kevin Quigley, Supervisor Mary Beth Greene Krafft, Deputy Supervisor Randy Clark Alexander Mazzocca Elizabeth J. Longinott Comprehensive Plan Committee J. Kerry McGuinness, Chairman Lorraine Bennett Mark Cote Doug Land James McGee Counsel: Stephen J. Gaba, Esq. Town Attorney 2 Town of Cornwall Comprehensive Plan Update Adopted March 13, 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY ................................ 7 WHY UPDATE NOW? ........................................................................................ 7 ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN ....................................................................... 8 2.0 CORNWALL TODAY: SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................... 8 2.1 Population ......................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Housing/Household Characteristics ................................................................... 16 2.3 Affordable Housing ............................................................................................. 21 3.0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farmland/Open Space Preservation Program Awards More Points to Grant Applications That Have “Intermunicipal Benefits.”
    Town of Stillwater, New York SSttiillllwwaatteerr FFaarrmmllaanndd PPrrootteeccttiioonn && GGrreeeenn IInnffrraassttrruuccttuurree PPllaann December 2007 DRAFT Prepared by: Chazen Engineering, Land Surveying & Landscape Architects CO., P.C. Stillwater Farmland Protection and Green Infrastructure Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................i INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 Rethinking Agricultural Protection................................................................ 1 What is Green Infrastructure Planning ......................................................... 3 Why Plan for Agricultural Protection & Green Infrastructure................ 4 THE PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................... 12 The Advisory Committee ................................................................................. 12 Public Participation ......................................................................................... 13 RESOURCE INVENTORY....................................................................................... 16 Existing Land Use.............................................................................................. 16 Agricultural Resources .................................................................................... 17 Natural Resources............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sword Surrender Site
    /Surrender of General Burgoyne/,by John Trumball, 1821 Source: Architect of the Capital Site Development and Cultural Landscape Treatment Plan Planning for Battles of Saratoga: Sword Surrender Site Town of Saratoga, Saratoga County, New York Grant # GA-2255-10-013 American Battlefield Protection Program National Park Service 1201 Eye Street NW (2255) Washington, DC 20005 FINAL – June 27, 2012 This material is based upon work assisted by a grant from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................................. iii INTRODUCTION Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Historical Significance .................................................................................................................................... 1 Description of the Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology and Scope of Work ................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1: LANDSCAPE REHABILITATION GOALS AND
    [Show full text]