DOCSLIB.ORG

HUSKROUA 2014-2020 Joint Operational Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HUSKROUA 2014-2020 Joint Operational Programme European Neighbourhood Instrument Hungary-Slovakia-Romania-Ukraine Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 As amended on 19 December 2019 JOINT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Approved by the participating countries on 25 June 2015, amended on 23 November 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Definition of the programme area ......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Participating countries and the Programme area ................................................................................. 8 2.2 Core regions ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Adjoining regions ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Major social, economic or cultural centres .......................................................................................... 12 2.5 Map of the programme area ............................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Intention to make use of Article 10(5) of Regulation (EU) No 232/2014 ............................................. 15 3 Analysis of the programme area .......................................................................................................... 16 3.1 General introduction of the area ......................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Local culture and preservation of historical heritage (TO3) ................................................................ 17 3.3 Environmental protection, climate change mitigation and adaptation (TO6) .................................... 18 3.4 Accessibility to the regions, development of sustainable and climate-proof transport and communication networks and systems (TO7) ................................................................................................... 20 3.5 Common challenges in the field of safety and security (TO8) .............................................................. 21 3.6 Main challenges and needs to be addressed by the programme from cross-border aspect, regarding economic, social, environmental and governance in line with future regional development trends ............... 22 3.7 Main potentials of the cooperation area in line with the regional capacity available ........................ 24 3.8 Lessons learnt from previous experiences in cross-border programmes ............................................. 26 4 Programme's strategy ......................................................................................................................... 29 4.1 General objective and vision of the joint operational programme ...................................................... 29 4.2 Selection process for the Thematic Objectives ..................................................................................... 29 4.3 Selected thematic objectives ............................................................................................................... 31 4.4 Planned activities within the selected thematic objectives ................................................................. 31 4.5 Hierarchy of the vision, objectives and priorities of the Programme ................................................... 35 4.6 Result indicators .................................................................................................................................. 37 4.7 Expected outputs, output indicators .................................................................................................... 40 4.8 Relation between the ENI strategic objectives and the thematic objectives of the Programme ......... 43 4.9 Contribution and coherence with the planned interventions towards macro-regional strategies and other Union-financed programmes in the countries and regions concerned ................................................... 43 4.10 Coherence with national, regional and other strategies and policies.................................................. 51 4.11 Coherence with EUSDR ........................................................................................................................ 56 5 Structures and appointment of the competent authorities and management bodies ........................... 59 5.1 Programme level bodies ...................................................................................................................... 59 5.1.1 Composition of the Joint Monitoring Committee and tasks ........................................................... 61 2 5.1.2 Managing Authority and its designation process ............................................................................ 63 5.1.3 Procedure for setting up the Joint Technical Secretariat ................................................................ 66 5.1.4 Intermediate body .......................................................................................................................... 69 5.1.5 Audit Authority and the members of the group of auditors ........................................................... 70 5.2 National level bodies ........................................................................................................................... 71 5.2.1 National authorities of all participating countries .......................................................................... 71 5.2.2 Control contact points, national controllers and auditors .............................................................. 72 6 Programme implementation ............................................................................................................... 76 6.1 Summary description of the management and control systems ......................................................... 76 6.2 Description of project selection procedures ......................................................................................... 79 6.2.1 Open Call for proposals procedure ................................................................................................. 79 6.2.2 The restricted call for proposals procedure .................................................................................... 80 6.2.3 Complaint handling procedure ....................................................................................................... 81 6.3 Provisional indicative time-frame for programme implementation .................................................... 82 6.4 Description per priority of nature of support ....................................................................................... 83 6.5 Description of planned use of technical assistance and applicable contract award procedures ......... 83 6.6 Description of the monitoring and evaluation systems ....................................................................... 84 3. ................................................................................................................................................................... 86 6.7 Information on fulfilment of regulatory requirements laid down in Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council .......................................................................................................... 87 The SEA process in line with the EC Directive and national legislations ......................................................... 87 The content of the Environmental Report in line with the EC Directive ......................................................... 88 Results of the Strategic Environmental Assessment process: ........................................................................ 88 6.8 Rules on eligibility of expenditure ........................................................................................................ 91 6.9 Irregularities and recoveries: Apportionment of liabilities among the participating countries ........... 91 6.10 Rules of transfer, use and monitoring of co-financing ......................................................................... 92 6.11 Description of IT systems for the reporting and exchange of computerised data between the Managing Authority and the Commission ........................................................................................................ 93 6.12 Principles of communication ................................................................................................................ 94 6.13 Language(s) adopted by the programme ............................................................................................ 95 7 Indicative financial plan ....................................................................................................................... 96 7.1 Thematic objectives by source of funding ............................................................................................ 96 7.2 Programme financial table .................................................................................................................. 97 8 Risk analysis and mitigating measures ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bat Fauna of the Aggtelek National Park and Its Surroundings (Hungary)
    Vespertilio 9–10: 33–56 , 2006 ISSN 1213-6123 The bat fauna of the Aggtelek National Park and its surroundings (Hungary) Sándor BOLDOGH Aggtelek National Park Directorate, H–3758 Jósvafő, Tengerszem-oldal 1., Hungary; [email protected] Abstract. The bat fauna of the Gömör-Torna Karst region has been studied for several decades, in par ti cu lar that of the Aggtelek Karst (Hungary). The earliest research was mainly conducted in the well-known Baradla cave system, whilst other sites in the region were somewhat neglected. At the end of the 1980s a new research programme started, when studies on house-dwelling bat species and a comparative analysis of results was systematically carried out. These results played an important role in the conservation strategies for the protection of roosts (e.g. in churches). Some of these roosts were of international im por tan ce. During the third period of research, a survey of man-made caverns and of forest-dwelling bat po pu la ti ons began. This research revealed that 26 bat species inhabited the administrative area of the Aggtelek National Park (24 species in the proper area of the national park). These fi gures prove that there is a very rich bat fauna in terms of both species and their populations. The latest faunistical studies and the pro te cti on of these populations have both signifi cantly improved our knowledge on the distribution and occur ren ce of several species. At the same time, it became necessary to reassess all previous data. Bats, faunistics, nature conservation, monitoring, Hungary Introduction A drastic decline in bat populations was observed in the second half of the twentieth century in several European countries (Stebbings 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Igazságügyi Közlöny 2008/1
    CXVI. ÉVFOLYAM ÁRA: 1680 Ft 1. SZÁM AZ IGAZSÁGÜGYI BUDAPEST, ÉS RENDÉSZETI MINISZTÉRIUM 2008. JANUÁR 31. HIVATALOS LAPJA FELHÍVÁS! Felhívjuk tisztelt Elõfizetõink figyelmét a közlöny utolsó oldalán közzétett tájékoztatóra és a 2008. évi elõfizetési árainkra TARTALOM Oldal TÖRVÉNYEK 2007: CLI tv. a jogi segítségnyújtással kapcsolatos egyes törvények módosításáról (indokolással) ........................................................................... 3 2007: CLII. tv. egyes vagyonnyilatkozat-tételi kötelezettségekrõl ............................................................................................................................... 19 2007: CLIII. tv. a Magyar Köztársaság Kormánya és Ukrajna Miniszteri Kabinetje között a kishatárforgalom szabályozásáról szóló Egyezmény ki- hirdetésérõl (indokolással) ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 2007: CLX. tv. a szabálysértésekrõl szóló 1999. évi LXIX. törvény módosításáról ................................................................................................... 56 2007: CLXII. tv. az egyes büntetõjogi tárgyú törvények módosításáról (indokolással)............................................................................................... 57 2007: CLXIII. tv. a büntetõ ügyekben alkalmazható közvetítõi tevékenységgel összefüggésben egyes törvények módosításáról ............................ 73 2007: CLXVI. tv. a bírák jogállásáról
    [Show full text]
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment-Passport-NEW-En.Pdf
    2000 кm Рига Latvia Sweden Denmark Lithuania Gdansk Russia Netherlands Belarus 1000 кm Rotterdam Poland Belgium Germany Kyiv 500 кm Czech Republic DOLYNA Ukraine France Slovakia Ivano- Frankivsk region Switzerland Austria Moldova Hungary Slovenia Romania Croatia Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia Italy Varna Montenegro Kosovo Bulgaria Macedonia Albania Turkey Community’s location Area of the community Dolyna district, 351.984 km2 Ivano-Frankivsk region, UkraineGreece Population Administrative center 49.2 thousand people Dolyna Area of agricultural land Community’s constituents 16.1 thousand ha Dolyna and 21 villages Natural resources Established on Oil, gas, salt June 30, 2019 Distance from Dolyna Nearest border International airports: to large cities: crossing points: Ivano-Frankivsk ІIvano-Frankivsk – 58 km Mostyska, Airport – 58 km Lviv region – 138 km Lviv – 110 km Danylo Halytskyi Shehyni, Airport Lviv – 114 km Kyiv – 635 km Lviv region – 151 km Boryspil Rava-Ruska, Airport Kyiv – 684 km Lviv region – 174 km Geography, nature, climate and resources Dolyna, the administrative center of Dolyna Map of Dolyna Amalgamated Territorial Community, is situ- Amalgamated Territorial Community ated in the north east of the district at the intersection of vital transport corridors linking different regions of Ukraine and connecting it to European countries. CLIMATE The climate is temperate continental and humid, with cool summers and mild winters. The frost-free period lasts an average of 155– 160 days, and the vegetation period is 205–215 days. Spring frost bites usually cease in the last third of April. Autumn frost bites arrive in the last third of September. HUMAN RESOURCES WATER RESOURCES The total number of working age population is 29.5 thousand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Great Plain Ideal Destination for Families
    THINK HUNGARY, MORE THAN EXPECTED THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAIN Ideal destination for families A waterpark and spa redolent of the Mediterranean all year round WELCOME! TRAVEL OppORTUNITIES IN THIS REGION OF HUngARY Health is precious to us all A world heritage site and an excellent and grows even more so in our tourist destination, Hortobágy, Europe’s most extensive contiguous grassland is accelerated lives! The Northern a unique example of balanced co-ex- Great Plain Region offers both istence between nature and traditional physical and spiritual rejuvena- herding culture. tion and helps us to downshift, The site of Europe’s largest aqua park take a break and recover from and a foremost spa town, Hajdúszoboszló exhaustion and stress, even attracts many international visitors. Medicinal thermal water gushing if for short periods only. forth from the depths of the earth has led A unique landscape offered to the evolution of a sophisticated bath by the tranquil Hungarian culture. Medicinal baths, thermal spas, “puszta” and the picturesque excellent services and expertise combine Tisza valley is ideal for outings to superbly cater to the needs of young and old alike. The region is ideal for both physical and spiritual rejuvenation and can be explored by bike, by boat, or on horseback. The romantic landscape, the serenity of nature and the delicious local cuisine are an irresistible attraction for tourists. Animals endemic to the Hungari- an “puszta” (grassland/pasture), e.g. grey cattle and Mangalitsa pigs, serve as in- gredients of unsurpassable quality for healthy food. Plums and apples grown in the region are processed into jam and dried delicacies or “pálinka”.
    [Show full text]
  • Vámosatya-Csaroda Kiemelt Jelentőségű Természetmegőrzési Terület (Kjtt)
    A Vámosatya-Csaroda (HUHN20047) kiemelt jelentőségű természetmegőrzési terület Natura 2000 fenntartási terve Debrecen 2020. 1 Készítette Hortobágyi Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság Együttműködő partner BioAqua Pro Környezetvédelmi Szolgáltató és Tanácsadó Kft. Bogland Természet-, és Környezetvédelmi Betéti Társaság E-misszió Természet- és Környezetvédelmi Egyesület Vezető szakmai koordinátor Kapocsi István Szakmai koordinátor Lesku Balázs Dr. Kiss Béla Dr. Gulyás Gergely Vezető természettudományi szakértő Dr. Müller Zoltán Vezető agrárgazdálkodási szakértő Hasznosi László Közreműködő szakértők Dr. Estók Péter Dr. Gulyás Gergely Horváth Dénes Lukács Attila Mizsei Edvárd Dr. Nagy Antal Dr. Sum Szabolcs Dr. Varga András Szabó Gyula Tóth Pál Tokaji Kitti dr. Ebesfalvi Sarolta © Hortobágyi Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság 2020. Ez a dokumentáció a szerzői jogról szóló 1999. évi LXXVI. törvény értelmében szerzői jogvédelem alatt áll. A dokumentáció nyilvános, a megfelelő hivatkozások mellett szabadon felhasználható és terjeszthető! 2 Tartalomjegyzék I. A Natura 2000 fenntartási terv 1. A terület azonosító adatai ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Név ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Azonosító kód ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Kiterjedés ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011. Évi Népszámlálás 3
    Központi Statisztikai Hivatal 2011. ÉVI NÉPSZÁMLÁLÁS 3. Területi adatok 3.16. Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg megye Debrecen, 2013 © Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, 2013 ISBN 978-963-235-347-0ö ISBN 978-963-235-412-5 Készült a Központi Statisztikai Hivatal Debreceni főosztályán az Informatikai főosztály, a Népszámlálási főosztály és a Tájékoztatási főosztály közreműködésével Felelős kiadó: Dr. Vukovich Gabriella elnök Főosztályvezető: Malakucziné Póka Mária Összeállította: Csizmazia Tamásné Kissné Majtényi Mónika Malakucziné Póka Mária Sólyom Ildikó A táblázó programot készítette: Papp Márton A kéziratot lektorálta: Dr. Hajnal Béla Tördelőszerkesztők: Bulik László Dobróka Zita Kerner-Kecskés Beatrix Zombori Orsolya Weisz Tamás További információ: Novák Géza Telefon: (+36-52) 529-809, e-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.nepszamlalas.hu [email protected] (+36-1) 345-6789 (telefon), (+36-1) 345-6788 (fax) Borítóterv: Lounge Design Kft. Nyomdai kivitelezés: Xerox Magyarország Kft. – 2013.056 TARTALOM Köszöntöm az Olvasót! ................................................................................................5 Összefoglaló .................................................................................................................7 1. A népesség száma és jellemzői ..................................................................................9 1.1. A népesség száma, népsűrűség..........................................................................9 1.2. Kormegoszlás, a férfi ak és a nők száma ................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian
    Geoffrey Hull and Halyna Koscharsky1 Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian When compared with its two large neighbours, Russian and Polish, the Ukrainian language presents a picture of striking internal variation. Not only are Ukrainian dialects more mutually divergent than those of Polish or of territorially more widespread Russian,2 but on the literary level the language has long been characterized by the existence of two variants of the standard which have never been perfectly harmonized, in spite of the efforts of nationalist writers for a century and a half. While Ukraine’s modern standard language is based on the eastern dialect of the Kyiv-Poltava-Kharkiv triangle, the literary Ukrainian cultivated by most of the diaspora communities continues to follow to a greater or lesser degree the norms of the Lviv koiné in 1 The authors would like to thank Dr Lance Eccles of Macquarie University for technical assistance in producing this paper. 2 De Bray (1969: 30-35) identifies three main groups of Russian dialects, but the differences are the result of internal evolutionary divergence rather than of external influences. The popular perception is that Russian has minimal dialectal variation compared with other major European languages. Maximilian Fourman (1943: viii), for instance, told students of Russian that the language ‘is amazingly uniform; the same language is spoken over the vast extent of the globe where the flag of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics flies; and you will be understood whether you are speaking to a peasant or a university professor. There are no dialects to bother you, although, of course, there are parts of the Soviet Union where Russian may be spoken rather differently, as, for instance, English is spoken differently by a Londoner, a Scot, a Welshman, an Irishman, or natives of Yorkshire or Cornwall.
    [Show full text]
  • 54 Abod Aggtelek Ajak Alap Anarcs Andocs Apagy Apostag Arka
    Bakonszeg Abod Anarcs Baks Andocs Baksa Aggtelek Apagy Balajt Ajak Apostag Alap Balaton Arka Balsa 54 Barcs Bokor Berkesz Boldogasszonyfa Berzence Basal Besence Boldva Beszterec Bonnya Battonya Biharkeresztes Biharnagybajom Borota Bihartorda Biharugra Bekecs Bikal Biri Bocskaikert Botykapeterd Belecska Bodony Beleg Bodroghalom Bucsa Benk Bodrogkisfalud Buj Bodrogolaszi Beret Bojt 55 Csipkerek Cece Csobaj Dombiratos Cered Csokonyavisonta Csaholc Csaroda Dabrony Damak Csehi Csehimindszent Darvas Csengele Csenger Csengersima Demecser Dunavecse Derecske Detek Ecseg Ecsegfalva Devecser Csernely Egeralja Doba Egerbocs Doboz Egercsehi 56 Egerfarmos Fegyvernek Egyek Encs Encsencs Gadna Endrefalva Enying Eperjeske Garadna Garbolc Fiad Fony Erk Gelej Gemzse Etes Furta Geszt Fancsal Farkaslyuk Gige 57 Hirics Golop Hedrehely Hobol Hegymeg Homrogd Hejce Hencida Hencse H Heresznye Ibafa Igar Gyugy Igrici Iharos Ilk Imola Inke Halmaj Heves Iregszemcse Hevesaranyos Irota Hangony Istenmezeje Hantos 58 Kamond Kamut Kelebia Kapoly Kemecse Kemse Kaposszerdahely Kenderes Kengyel Karancsalja Karancskeszi Kerta Kaba Karcag Karcsa Kevermes Karos Kisar Kaszaper Kisasszond Kisasszonyfa 59 Kisbajom Kisvaszar Kisberzseny Kisbeszterce Kisszekeres Kisdobsza Kocsord Kokad n Krasznokvajda Kunadacs Kishuta Kiskinizs Kunbaja Kuncsorba Kiskunmajsa Kunhegyes Kunmadaras Kompolt Kismarja Kupa Kispirit Kutas Kistelek Lad 60 Magyaregregy Lak Magyarhertelend Magyarhomorog Laskod Magyarkeszi Magyarlukafa Magyarmecske Magyartelek Makkoshotyka Levelek Liget Litka Merenye Litke
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • February 2009 with the Support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis
    Lo Tishkach Foundation European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative Avenue Louise 112, 2nd Floor | B-1050 Brussels | Belgium Telephone: +32 (0) 2 649 11 08 | Fax: +32 (0) 2 640 80 84 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.lo-tishkach.org The Lo Tishkach European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative was established in 2006 as a joint project of the Conference of European Rabbis and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. It aims to guarantee the effective and lasting preservation and protection of Jewish cemeteries and mass graves throughout the European continent. Identified by the Hebrew phrase Lo Tishkach (‘do not forget’), the Foundation is establishing a comprehensive publicly-accessible database of all Jewish burial grounds in Europe, currently featuring details on over 9,000 Jewish cemeteries and mass graves. Lo Tishkach is also producing a compendium of the different national and international laws and practices affecting these sites, to be used as a starting point to advocate for the better protection and preservation of Europe’s Jewish heritage. A key aim of the project is to engage young Europeans, bringing Europe’s history alive, encouraging reflection on the values that are important for responsible citizenship and mutual respect, giving a valuable insight into Jewish culture and mobilising young people to care for our common heritage. Preliminary Report on Legislation & Practice Relating to the Protection and Preservation of Jewish Burial Grounds Hungary Prepared by Andreas Becker for the Lo Tishkach Foundation in February 2009 with the support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Kelet-Szlovákiai Vasmű Környezetkárosító Hatásainak Feltárása, És Kezelésére Tett Javaslatok a Határ Két Oldalán HELYZETFELMÉRŐ TANULMÁNY 2005 I
    A Kelet-Szlovákiai Vasmű környezetkárosító hatásainak feltárása, és kezelésére tett javaslatok a határ két oldalán HELYZETFELMÉRŐ TANULMÁNY 2005 I . ENCSI LÁTKÉP NAGYIDAI ÖNKORMÁNYZAT ÉPÜLETE KÉSZÍTETTÉK: ROZINYÁK JÓZSEF KÖRNYEZETVÉDELMI SZAKÉRTŐ DR FARKAS JÓZSEF BIOLÓGUS RAKACZKINÉ KECSKÉS ERZSÉBET KÖRNYEZETVÉDELMI SZAKÉRTŐ CSEHIL ZSOLT KÖRNYEZETVÉDELMI MÉRNÖK 1 Abaúji Területfejlesztési Önkormányzati Szövetség, Encs A Kelet-Szlovákiai Vasmű környezetkárosító hatásainak feltárása, és kezelésére tett javaslatok a határ két oldalán HELYZETFELMÉRŐ TANULMÁNY 2005 I . TARTALOM Bevezető............................................................................................................................4 I. A vizsgált terület elhelyezkedése, bemutatása...............................................................5 II. A Környezetre káros hatást gyakorló gócpontok bemutatása ....................................27 III. A térség településeinek csatornázottsága..................................................................37 IV. A Mezőgazdaságban alkalmazott kemikáliák hatásainak vizsgálata........................43 V. Szilárd hulladékkezelés jelenlegi állapota..................................................................55 V.1. Hulladékok csoportosítása..................................................................................55 V.2. Alapelvek az országos hulladékgazdálkodási célok elérésében.........................57 V.3. A hulladékkezelés jelenlegi állapota az Encsi Kistérségben..............................59 V.3.1. Települési
    [Show full text]