DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding China's Wildlife Markets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding China's Wildlife Markets Understanding China's wildlife markets : Trade and tradition in an age of pandemic World Development Zhu, Annah; Zhu, George https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105108 This article is made publicly available in the institutional repository of Wageningen University and Research, under the terms of article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, also known as the Amendment Taverne. This has been done with explicit consent by the author. Article 25fa states that the author of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds is entitled to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work. This publication is distributed under The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) 'Article 25fa implementation' project. In this project research outputs of researchers employed by Dutch Universities that comply with the legal requirements of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act are distributed online and free of cost or other barriers in institutional repositories. Research outputs are distributed six months after their first online publication in the original published version and with proper attribution to the source of the original publication. You are permitted to download and use the publication for personal purposes. All rights remain with the author(s) and / or copyright owner(s) of this work. Any use of the publication or parts of it other than authorised under article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright act is prohibited. Wageningen University & Research and the author(s) of this publication shall not be held responsible or liable for any damages resulting from your (re)use of this publication. For questions regarding the public availability of this article please contact [email protected] World Development 136 (2020) 105108 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect World Development journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev Viewpoint, Policy Forum or Opinion Understanding China’s wildlife markets: Trade and tradition in an age of pandemic ⇑ Annah Zhu a, , George Zhu b a Wageningen University, The Netherlands b Double Bind Media, USA article info abstract Article history: Environmentalists have long been concerned about the rate at which China is consuming and trading in threatened and endangered wildlife. The recent COVID-19 global pandemic has made wildlife consump- tion an issue that concerns everyone around the world. Formerly obscure practices like wet markets and Keywords: commodities like pangolin scales or bear bile have gained international notoriety. Along with that atten- Wildlife trade tion has come increasing politicization and ideological polarization. Beyond the global fight against the Asia pandemic, there has been another global struggle over the meaning and origin of the disease, as evi- China denced by the spread of terms like ‘‘Wuhan Flu” and ‘‘bat soup.” What has become obscured by the news COVID-19 cycle struggling to keep up with the rapid spread of the virus and the political sound and fury surround- Endangered species Globalization ing it is any meaningful understanding of China’s wildlife consumption and trade. Deeply ingrained in Chinese culture and history, the wildlife trade is not going away anytime soon. Despite a national ban, already wet markets are returning across China. Addressing the wildlife trade in China, we argue, requires first understanding it. Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The link between wildlife and pandemics is simultaneously the other, obscures a more significant cause and a more relevant obvious and contested. Ebola, Zika, SARS, and many other infec- dynamic to viral spread – namely, globalization. Transmission of tious diseases all spread through human-environment interac- infectious disease to humans is one thing, global spread is another. tions. Initially, pristine wilderness teeming with diverse species Wet markets in China, for example, date back millennia, but only in was considered to be the breeding ground of these diseases the past two decades have they become connected to ski resorts in (Vidal, 2020).1 The recent COVID-19 pandemic, however, seems to the Italian alps, cruise ships in the South Pacific, and megachurches demonstrate the opposite: that infectious disease can proliferate in in South Korea via international trade and travel. Globalization – or spaces of intense human-wildlife interaction, such as the now infa- rather, ‘‘hyper-globalization” (Rodrik, 2017) – is the force driving mous Wuhan wet market thought to be the origin of the outbreak. the spread of pandemic to every country on Earth. In the case of It confirms a growing suspicion that human exploitation of wilder- COVID-19, the ‘‘cause” then – if one could be pinpointed at all – ness and deforestation – not pristine forests – contribute to viral out- is not an inauspicious ‘‘bat soup” somewhere in Wuhan, but rather breaks (Rulli, Santini, Hayman, & D’Odorico, 2017, Olivero et al., our hyper-globalized world. 2020). The take-away, then, is to keep forests intact and humans To identify globalization as a ‘‘cause” of global pandemic is, in and wilderness separate (Scientific American, 2020, Trent, 2020). a way, stating the obvious. But recognizing COVID-19 as a global Shifting the culprit of global pandemic from intact wilderness at phenomenon – and a product of a hyper-globalized world – also one extreme, to deforestation and human-wildlife interaction at reinforces the need to address it globally. Global problems, after all, call for global solutions. Yet, the responses seen thus far are more likely to proffer isolationism, politicization, and ideological ⇑ Corresponding author. polarization – all of which conjure anti-globalization sentiment E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Zhu). without any productive consideration of what contemporary 1 This was one of the take-always from the Ebola outbreak in 1996, which was forms of globalization should indeed look like. Governments thought to have originated from chimpanzees hunted in the forest. Many believed that Ebola outbreaks occurred in intact forests, where bushmeat hunting was still a around the world are now asking, some louder than others: possibility because, well, there was still bushmeat (Herman, 2014). ‘‘I don’t think it what should be done with China? How to extract concessions? has anything to do with deforestation,” a lead virologist at the Development Research In terms of the environment, many are demanding that Chinese Institute commented in response to the outbreak (Vidal, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105108 0305-750X/Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2 A. Zhu, G. Zhu / World Development 136 (2020) 105108 authorities stop the trade and consumption of wildlife altogether golin – an endangered mammal suggested to be linked to the (Mukpo, 2020). transmission of COVID-19 to humans – provides a prime example. Demanding reparations from China, or the cessation of the Pangolin scales can sell for nearly $800 per kilogram, higher than wildlife trade, is a highly antagonistic rather than collaborative the price of silver (Challender, Harrop, & MacMillan, 2015). To be global response. Curtailing the wildlife trade in China and securing sure, the rarity and exoticism of the pangolin contributes to the wet markets against future pandemics requires first understanding value they command on the market, but the greater factor is their why the trade persists despite trenchant international opposition. perceived value as a prized ingredient in traditional Chinese This, in turn, requires grappling with cultural, historical, and philo- medicine. sophical dimensions that are only superficially acknowledged The speculative dimensions of markets for endangered species within environmental debates. are poorly documented if not entirely ignored in Western media, Working toward this deeper understanding, we highlight three but need to be understood if wildlife consumption is to be cur- facets of China’s wildlife trade often overlooked in Western media tailed. This is especially urgent given the fact that trade restrictions and scholarship, but that are vital to understanding its dynamics can have the unintended consequence of artificially driving and persistence: (1) the fundamental importance of traditional demand higher given conditions of market speculation (Biggs, Chinese medicine in everyday life in China, (2) the speculative Courchamp, Martin, & Possingham, 2013, Zhu 2017, 2018, 2020a, aspect of demand for rare wildlife, and (3) the reliance on captive b). Total bans can only be effective if they come from within China breeding as a conservation tool for preventing species extinction. and are perceived as well-enforced and permanent, rather than Together, these three factors illustrate China’s wildlife trade not internationally imposed (Harvey, Alden, & Wu, 2017). This was from the perspective of environmentalists with the mission to stop the case with China’s ivory ban in 2017, a success by most stan- it, but from the perspective of hundreds of millions of people fol- dards (WWF 2019). While a comprehensive ivory ban was more lowing millennia-old traditions in our contemporary, hyper- feasible because ivory is not an ingredient in traditional Chinese globalized society. They show why wildlife trade and consumption medicine, successful bans on traditionally consumed wildlife are will likely persist despite the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PROCEEDINGS of the WORKSHOP on TRADE and CONSERVATION of PANGOLINS NATIVE to SOUTH and SOUTHEAST ASIA 30 June – 2 July 2008, Singapore Zoo Edited by S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP ON TRADE AND CONSERVATION OF PANGOLINS NATIVE TO SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA 30 June – 2 July 2008, Singapore Zoo Edited by S. Pantel and S.Y. Chin Wildlife Reserves Singapore Group PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP ON TRADE AND CONSERVATION OF PANGOLINS NATIVE TO SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA 30 JUNE –2JULY 2008, SINGAPORE ZOO EDITED BY S. PANTEL AND S. Y. CHIN 1 Published by TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia © 2009 TRAFFIC Southeast Asia All rights reserved. All material appearing in these proceedings is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit TRAFFIC Southeast Asia as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in these proceedings do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC Network, WWF or IUCN. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Layout by Sandrine Pantel, TRAFFIC Southeast Asia Suggested citation: Sandrine Pantel and Chin Sing Yun (ed.). 2009. Proceedings of the Workshop on Trade and Conservation of Pangolins Native to South and Southeast Asia, 30 June-2 July
    [Show full text]
  • Reality Check of US Allegations Against China on COVID-19
    Reality Check of US Allegations Against China on COVID-19 Reality Check of US Allegations Against China on COVID-19 Catalog 1.Allegation: COVID-19 is “Chinese virus” Reality Check: WHO has made it clear that the naming of a disease should not be associated with a particular country or place. 2.Allegation: Wuhan is the origin of the virus Reality Check: Being the first to report the virus does not mean that Wuhan is its origin. In fact, the origin is still not identified. Source tracing is a serious scientific matter, which should be based on science and should be studied by scientists and medical experts. 3.Allegation: The virus was constructed by the Wuhan Institute of Virology Reality Check: All available evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is natural in origin, not man-made. 4.Allegation: COVID-19 was caused by an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology Reality Check: The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory (Wuhan P4 Laboratory) in the WIV is a government cooperation program between China and France. The Institute does not have the capability to design and synthesize a new coronavirus, and there is no evidence of pathogen leaks or staff infections in the Institute. 5.Allegation: China spread the virus to the world Reality Check: China took the most stringent measures within the shortest possible time, which has largely kept the virus within Wuhan. Statistics show that very few cases were exported from China. 6.Allegation: The Chinese contracted the virus while eating bats Reality Check: Bats are never part of the Chinese diet.
    [Show full text]
  • And Wildlife Trafficking
    Coronavirus (COVID-19) and wildlife trafficking PUBE Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Coronavirus (COVID-19) and wildlife trafficking The ongoing Covid crisis has brought renewed attention to the global problem of wildlife trafficking. The World Health Organization has determined that COVID-19, just like SARS, Ebola, Bird Flu, and MERS, originated from an animal. In a recently published Nature article, scientists claim that smuggling of pangolins in South-East Asia could be one of the triggers of the current crisis, as these smuggled animals carried viruses closely related to coronavirus. In fact, pangolins are the most-commonly illegally trafficked animal in South East Asia, used both as food and in traditional medicine. The OECD Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade has been looking at the threat of wildlife trafficking. In a 2019 report The Illegal Wildlife Trade in Southeast Asia, the OECD has reported that, after pangolins, the other most traded illegal wildlife products in South East Asia were good such as carved ivory, big cats, rhino horn and various live animals. The Task Force finds that several complex trade routes are used to smuggle wildlife products such as pangolins, and that Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam are the key transit countries for these illegal wildlife trade products. Illegally smuggled wildlife products arrive into the Southeast Asian region via air and sea, and subsequently transit through complex and organized routing processes. Poachers sell pangolins mostly in regional markets in Viet Nam and China where their consumption as food is appreciated, and their scales are used for medical purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Wildlife Trade Bans Enhance Or Undermine Conservation Efforts?
    Applied Biodiversity Sciences Perspectives Series Advancing Conservation with innovative ideas from the future generation Do Wildlife Trade Bans Enhance or Undermine Conservation Efforts? Anna Santos Texas A&M University Thitikan Satchabut Texas A&M University Gabriela Vigo Trauco Texas A&M University Office: Mailing address: Email: [email protected] Applied Biodiversity Science NSF‐IGERT Phone: (979) 845‐7494 Texas A&M University Fax: (979) 845‐4096 216 Old Heep Bldg. Room: 110G Old Heep 2258 TAMU College Station, TX, 77843 © 2011 Applied Biodiversity Sciences. All rights reserved. http://biodiversity.tamu.edu/ The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions and policies of Texas A&M University, any of the co‐sponsoring or supporting organizations, or the Applied Biodiversity Sciences program. Permission must be secured by copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material included in this document. Applied Biodiversity Sciences Perspectives Series No. 1(3) May, 2011 By Anna Santos, Thitikan Satchabut, Gabriela Vigo Trauco Suggested citation: + Santos, A., Satchabut, T., & Vigo Trauco, G. (2001). Do wildlife trade bans enhance or undermine conservation efforts? Applied Biodiversity Perspective Series, 1(3), 1‐15. ABSTRACT The billion dollar businesses of both legal and illegal wildlife trade show little decline and continue to pose major threats to global biodiversity. Despite international wildlife trade bans such as the Appendix I listing of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), the illegal trade of wildlife undermines conservation efforts. Evidence has shown that Appendix I listing can inadvertently increase black market prices and trade of wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement on Illegal Wildlife Trade July 2020
    Position Statement on Illegal Wildlife Trade July 2020 The Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) supports legal, sustainable, ethical wildlife trade that does not pose a threat to the conservation of species or human or animal health. AZA recognizes that illegal wildlife trade is a multi-faceted, international crisis that has devastating impacts to both animals and humans. Illegal wildlife trade: ● Is fueled by global demand for illegal wildlife and wildlife products. ● Is a significant threat to wildlife, driving many endangered and threatened species to the brink of extinction, and negatively impacting the earth’s biodiversity. ● Poses risks to human health and welfare, damages the global economy, and fuels transnational criminal networks, government instability and corruption. AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums, with approximately 200 million annual visitors, tens of millions of people reached through social media, and through their extensive conservation work, are well-positioned to play a critical role to reduce—and eventually end—illegal wildlife trade. Therefore, AZA supports the following strategies and actions to help stop illegal wildlife trade: • Raise awareness with consumers and the general public about the illegal wildlife trade through targeted messaging and campaigns to effect behavior change and reduce consumer demand for illegal wildlife products. • Support – both directly and through audience engagement – legislation at the local, national, and international levels to strengthen anti- poaching and anti-trafficking regulations and reduce demand for illegal wildlife. • Advocate for the closure of live animal markets that contribute to illegal and unsustainable trade, threaten human health, or jeopardize animal welfare. • Support anti-poaching initiatives such as training, patrolling, provision of equipment, and application of innovative anti-poaching tools such as poacher cams and SMART1.
    [Show full text]
  • International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S
    International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy Liana Sun Wyler Analyst in International Crime and Narcotics Pervaze A. Sheikh Specialist in Natural Resources Policy July 23, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34395 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy Summary Global trade in illegal wildlife is a potentially vast illicit economy, estimated to be worth billions of dollars each year. Some of the most lucrative illicit wildlife commodities include elephant ivory, rhino horn, sturgeon caviar, and so-called “bushmeat.” Wildlife smuggling may pose a transnational security threat as well as an environmental one. Numerous sources indicate that some organized criminal syndicates, insurgent groups, and foreign military units may be involved in various aspects of international wildlife trafficking. Limited anecdotal evidence also indicates that some terrorist groups may be engaged in wildlife crimes, particularly poaching, for monetary gain. Some observers claim that the participation of such actors in wildlife trafficking can therefore threaten the stability of countries, foster corruption, and encourage violence to protect the trade. Reports of escalating exploitation of protected wildlife, coupled with the emerging prominence of highly organized and well-equipped illicit actors in wildlife trafficking, suggests that policy challenges persist. Commonly cited challenges include legal loopholes that allow poachers and traffickers to operate with impunity, gaps in foreign government capabilities to address smuggling problems, and persistent structural drivers such as lack of alternative livelihoods in source countries and consumer demand. To address the illicit trade in endangered wildlife, the international community has established, through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), a global policy framework to regulate and sometimes ban exports of selected species.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Along a Rural-Urban Transect in Viet Nam
    agriculture Article Interactions between Food Environment and (Un)healthy Consumption: Evidence along a Rural-Urban Transect in Viet Nam Trang Nguyen 1,* , Huong Pham Thi Mai 2, Marrit van den Berg 1, Tuyen Huynh Thi Thanh 2 and Christophe Béné 3 1 Development Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Asia Office, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; [email protected] (H.P.T.M.); [email protected] (T.H.T.T.) 3 International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali 763537, Colombia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: There is limited evidence on food environment in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) and the application of food environment frameworks and associated metrics in such settings. Our study examines how food environment varies across an urban-peri-urban-rural gradient from three sites in North Viet Nam and its relationship with child undernutrition status and household consumption of processed food. By comparing three food environments, we present a picture of the food environment in a typical emerging economy with specific features such as non-market food sources (own production and food transfers) and dominance of the informal retail sector. We combined quantitative data (static geospatial data at neighborhood level and household survey) and Citation: Nguyen, T.; Pham Thi Mai, qualitative data (in-depth interviews with shoppers). We found that across the three study sites, H.; van den Berg, M.; Huynh Thi traditional open and street markets remain the most important outlets for respondents. Contrary to Thanh, T.; Béné, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Escaping the 'Era of Pandemics': Experts Warn Worse Crises to Come
    Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Media Release • Access the executive summary and the full Report here: www.ipbes.net/pandemics • Access social media assets/images here: https://bit.ly/PandemicsReportResources • For interviews: [email protected] Escaping the ‘Era of Pandemics’: Experts Warn Worse Crises to Come Options Offered to Reduce Risk Highlights: Intergovernmental Council on Pandemic Prevention; Addressing risk drivers including deforestation & wildlife trade; Tax high pandemic-risk activities 631,000 – 827,000 unknown viruses in nature could still infect people; More frequent, deadly and costly pandemics forecast; Current economic impacts are 100 times the estimated cost of prevention Future pandemics will emerge more often, spread more rapidly, do more damage to the world economy and kill more people than COVID-19 unless there is a transformative change in the global approach to dealing with infectious diseases, warns a major new report on biodiversity and pandemics by 22 leading experts from around the world. Convened by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) for an urgent virtual workshop about the links between degradation of nature and increasing pandemic risks, the experts agree that escaping the era of pandemics is possible, but that this will require a seismic shift in approach from reaction to prevention. COVID-19 is at least the sixth global health pandemic since the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918, and although it has its origins in microbes carried by animals, like all pandemics its emergence has been entirely driven by human activities, says the report released on Thursday. It is estimated that another 1.7 million currently ‘undiscovered’ viruses exist in mammals and birds – of which up to 827,000 could have the ability to infect people.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Student Directory
    Operations Research Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology GRADUATE STUDENT DIRECTORY November 2020 Moïse Blanchard Operations Research Center 275 Medford Street Massachusetts Institute of Technology Somerville, 02143 77 Massachusetts Avenue, E40-103 530-302-6432; +33 7 68 83 69 35 Cambridge, MA 02139 Email: [email protected] Education Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Candidate for PhD in Operations Research; expected completion, May 2023. GPA: 4.0 Advisors: Professor Patrick Jaillet and Professor Alexandre Jacquillat Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France MS and BS in Applied Mathematics, completion July 2019. GPA: 4.0 Valedictorian Prépa at Lycée Louis-le-Grand, Paris, France Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, completion July 2016. Prépa is selective post-secondary scientific studies leading to the Grandes Ecoles. Work Experience 2018 BNP Paribas Cardif, Lima, Peru Actuarial Intern Pricing and technical studies intern in the Actuarial Area. Classification automatization. 2016-2017 French Foreign Legion, Mayotte, France Land forces officer (Lieutenant) at Détachement de Légion Etrangère de Mayotte Group leader, operational and tactical instructor for malgach soldiers, and coordinator for operations against illegal immigration. Research Experience 2019–Present Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Research Assistant Advisors: Professor Patrick Jaillet and Professor Alexandre Jacquillat Optimization under uncertainty on combinatorial problems including optimal matchings, TSP and other routing
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Trade, Origins of COVID-19, and Preventing Future Pandemics”
    U.S. Congressional International Conservation Caucus Virtual Caucus Hearing “Wildlife Trade, Origins of COVID-19, and Preventing Future Pandemics” Written testimony John E. Scanlon AO Special Envoy, African Parks 15th April 2020 Witness expertise1 A career spanning Australia, Germany, Kenya, the Russian Federation, South Africa and Switzerland, working on environment and sustainable development governance, institutions, law and policy at the international, national, sub-national and local level and across multiple disciplines. Experience gained in senior positions with the private sector, in government, with international organisations and the United Nations, and most recently with a non-profit organization, including serving as: Special Envoy, African Parks (2018-continuing); Secretary-General, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Secretariat (CITES) (2010-2018); Chair, International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC) (2010-2018); Principal Adviser on Policy & Programme, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2007-2010); Head, Environmental Law Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2001-2004), and Chief Executive, Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs (South Australia), (1997-2000). Qualifications: Bachelor of Laws (1983); Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice (1983), and Master of Laws (Environmental) (1995). Admitted to legal practice (1984). Attorney in private legal practice (1984-1994). Executive Summary o Health and wildlife experts alike have warned us for decades of the public health risks associated with people mixing with wild animals, including through habitat destruction, illegal or poorly regulated wildlife trade, and the sale of wildlife through ‘wet markets.’ o As we take immediate measures to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, we must also look ahead and envisage a reformed international system of laws, programmes and financing that is best able to avoid the next wildlife-related pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Crime – Understanding Risks, Avenues for Action Part 1: Illegal Wildlife Trade and Financial Crime
    Wildlife crime – understanding risks, avenues for action Part 1: Illegal wildlife trade and financial crime Green Corruption – Basel Institute on Governance | April 2021 Basel Institute on Governance Associated Institute of Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11 the University of Basel [email protected] | www.baselgovernance.org BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE Table of contents 1 At a glance 3 2 Introduction to wildlife crime 4 3 CITES and national laws 9 4 Legal and illegal supply chains 11 5 Organised crime and corruption 15 6 Organisations and partnerships against wildlife crime 19 7 Quick quiz 23 8 Bibliography and further learning resources 26 9 Annex: Infographics 30 BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE About this learning resource This publication is the PDF version of a flexible and practical learning resource developed by the Green Corruption programme at the Basel Institute on Governance. It is aimed at: • Private-sector companies exposed to risks of illegal wildlife trade and related crimes, including financial institutions, transport companies, traders and wholesale retailers • Policy makers and practitioners in both conservation and anti-corruption fields • Law enforcement The aim is to broaden understanding of the threats that wildlife crimes pose to sustainable development and clean business. It provides relevant information, statistics and background knowledge to help enhance policies and processes aimed at curbing wildlife crime and associated risks. The focus is on financial crimes and supply chain vulnerabilities that facilitate the illegal trade in wildlife and thereby increase companies’ legal, financial and reputational risks. This learning resource and many more are available as interactive learning tools on the Basel Institute’s LEARN platform: learn.baselgovernance.org The Green Corruption programme at the Basel Institute on Governance applies anti- corruption and governance tools to address environmental crime and degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern Society and COVID-19 Pandemic: Old, New and Scary Mamzer, Hanna
    www.ssoar.info Postmodern society and COVID-19 Pandemic: old, new and scary Mamzer, Hanna Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Mamzer, H. (2020). Postmodern society and COVID-19 Pandemic: old, new and scary. Society Register, 4(2), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.01 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC Lizenz (Namensnennung- This document is made available under a CC BY-NC Licence Nicht-kommerziell) zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu (Attribution-NonCommercial). For more Information see: den CC-Lizenzen finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.de SOCIETY REGISTER 2020 / 4(2): 7-18 ISSN 2544–5502 DOI: 10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.01 POSTMODERN SOCIETY AND COVID-19 PANDEMIC: OLD, NEW AND SCARY HANNA MAMZER1 1 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Szamarzewskiego 89 C, 60-568 Poznań, Poland. ORCID: 0000- 0002-2251-7639, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Critical events of a dangerous progression, such as the COVID-19 pan- demic, may become the turning points in the functioning of entire societies. Such events obviously foster changes. They disrupt the sense of ontological security, gener- ate fears and enforce change in the organization of social relations, also in a creative and positive manner. In addition to these effects, they also induce many others. They are a magnifier enabling you to see how modern societies are functioning. Therefore, a pandemic allows to see and describe more clearly the characteristics of postmodern human communities.
    [Show full text]