Appendix:

Cornwall Annual

Monitoring Report 2017

Supporting documents and analysis for the Annual Monitoring Report 2017

Date: 14/12/2017 Version: 1

Cornwall Council

CORNWALL MONITORING REPORT 2017 ‐ OVERVIEW TABLE

No. INDICATOR TRENDS/TARGETS Reported? OVERALL JUDGEMENT NOTES

2.1 Number of new jobs created Provision of 38,000 full time jobs within the plan period.   Current trends indicate a small shortfall 704,000 sqm of employment floorspace over the plan period (359,583 sqm to be B1a and B1b On track for industrial target but trailing for 2.2 Amount of net additional B Class employment floorspace provided office use, 344,417 sqm to be B1c, B2 and B8 industrial premises). Delivery in accordance with   Office target sub area targets. Delivery of purpose built student accommodation that meets the needs generated through 2.3 Net additional purpose built student accommodation Projections indicate 58% PBSA by 2030 the expansion of the university in Falmouth and Penryn.   Net additional Gypsy Traveller pitches provided by: (i) Residential Pitches; (ii) Transit Delivery of 318 residential pitches; 60 Transit pitches; and 11 Show People pitches in the plan 2.4 Currently behind on residential target. Pitches; (iii) Showpeople period.  Delivery of 2,550 bed spaces in communal establishments (defined as Residential Care and or ® Under review as alternative provision is 2.5 Net additional communal nursing and specialist accommodation for older persons Nursing Homes).   becoming favoured. Housing Trajectory including: To deliver a minimum of 2,625 dwellings per year (residual delivery of a minimum of 52,500 a)Net additional dwellings in previous years; dwellings over the plan period b) Net additional dwellings for the reporting year; • To ensure at least a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites 2.6 Currently 6.2yr housing supply c) net additional dwellings in future years and; • Delivery in accordance with sub area targets identified in the Policy   d) the managed delivery target 2.6 Amount of new housing development allocated in • To ensure that Neighbourhood Plans allocate land for housing to meet any shortfall within 2 Neighbourhood Plans years of the adoption of the Local Plan Strategic Policies Delivery in accordance with sub area targets 3. Amount and proportion of all major development provided in settlements. 3.1 Net Planning application for development at West Carclaze/Baal approved and or allocated in a West Carclaze permission decision pending late 3 additional dwellings provided in named settlements and the remainder of the CNA. 3.2 submitted site allocations Local Plan within two years of adoption of the Cornwall Local Plan‐   October 17. Development of eco‐communities at West Carclaze/Baal and par Docks Strategic Policies Amount and type of town centre uses floorspace provided Report annual delivery by: (i) within town centres areas (i) town centres areas Insignificant loss edge of centre, significant gains 4.1 (ii) edge of centre and out of centre locations (ii) edge of centre and out of centre locations   out of centre. (iii) out of town areas (iii) out of town areas

The amount of retail service, comparison and convenience floorspace in the main town Amount of A1 uses remained static over the last 4.2 Report as change over time and in relation to the Cornwall average centres 4.2a The changes in the proportion of retail uses within Primary Shopping Areas   3 years

Net increase of 6577.6 sqm floorspace was 4.3 Amount of retail and community facilities lost in smaller settlements No net loss of existing services and facilities in smaller settlements   delivered Cornwall average vacancy rate of 10.7% is below 4.4 Vacancy rates in main town centres Rates at or below the national average   the national average (12.1%) for 2017 Net gain to employment land on safeguarded 5.3 Amount of employment land lost to other uses from safeguarded employment sites No net loss of viable employment land on safeguarded employment sites   sites Facilities with care homes decreasing, while 6.1 Amount of housing provided to meet households with specific needs Net increase   facilities outside care homes increasing. All new housing developments of 10 or more dwellings provide an appropriate housing mix Source for new housing by area not found. Year 6.2 Amount of new housing provided by house type, tenure and size  that reflects local housing market need ® on year mix examined. Net increase' problematic but meeting demand 6.3 Number of self build and custom build housing provided Net increase  ® for provision of appropriate sites Number of affordable homes provided: (i) on sites where dwellings would have a combined gross floorspace of more than 1000 square metres; or (ii) on sites with a net To attain a contribution towards affordable housing provision on all development with a Contribution information not yet collated ‐ 8.1 increase of 10 dwellings combined gross floor space of more than 1000 square metres or on sites with a net increase  alternative datasets will be investigated 2017‐18 8.1a Amount of contribution towards affordable housing provision on sites of 6 to 9 of 10 or more dwellings or on sites of 6 or more dwellings in rural areas ® dwellings in rural parishes All new housing developments above the affordable housing threshold to meet the minimum Most permissions granted prior to LP adoption ‐ 8.3 Amount of affordable housing provided on sites meeting the minimum threshold by Zone percentage of affordable housing for the appropriate zone: 50% in zone 1, 40% in zone 2 ,   judgements would not yet be valid 35% in zone 3, 30% in zone 4 and 25% in zone 5. Number and proportion of gypsy and traveller applications refused on grounds of not Just one permission refused post Local Plan 11 All residential and transit site developments meeting the requirements of the policy complying with policy   adoption (i) renewable energy capacity and low carbon energy generation installed; 14 Net increase Renewable capacity steadily increasing. (ii) useable heat generation capacity installed   Number or proportion of applications refused on grounds of potentially effecting "100%" target inappropriate. No permissions 15 100% Renewable energy capacity of existing installations   refused.

Mineral production (tonnes) of various sectors (primary aggregates, secondary / recycled Primary aggregate production in line with the annual Local Aggregates Assessment Primary aggregate production has been at a 17.1 aggregates, building stone, china clay and metalliferous minerals) in the county Net increase in the production of secondary/recycled aggregate   smilar level for the past 10 years.

Number of applications granted on safeguarded mineral sites identified as causing the No net loss to sites safeguarded for their mineral 18 No net loss to sites safeguarded for their mineral reserves sterilization of the mineral reserves   reserves No. INDICATOR TRENDS/TARGETS Reported? OVERALL JUDGEMENT NOTES

No change in capacity for all waste facility types apart from an increase in:(a) construction Capacity of existing and new waste management facilities for: and demolition waste landfill provision of 659,000 tonnes;(b) construction and demolition Not yet possible to ascertain annual net in year 1 19.1 (i) transfer stations; (ii) Composting; (iii) Recycling; (iv) energy from waste;(v) landfill waste recycling of 377,000 tonnes; (c) 200,000m3 of landfill capacity for Local Authority   of monitoring collected waste Not yet possible to ascertain annual net in year 1 19.2 Amount of waste a) recycled b) composted and c) used in energy production Annual net increase   of monitoring Not yet possible to ascertain annual net in year 1 19.3 Amount of waste landfilled by (i) households and ii) commercial and industrial. Annual net increase   of monitoring Number and proportion of applications for new waste management facilities approved on 100% (2 permissions) approved since LP 20.1 100% policy grounds   adoption. % of residential development on PDL has 21.1 The amount (%) of residential development provided on previously developed land. Reported figure as trend   decreased each year for the past 3 years. Net increase in current levels of biodiversity habitat through the creation of (i) new Wildlife 23.2 Amount of biodiversity habitat gained through mitigation Suitability of indicator under review. Corridors and (ii) new Local Wildlife Sites ® Slight decrease from baseline and previous year, 23.3 % of SSSIs in a favourable or recovering condition Improve   improvement overall since 2010. Number of new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Approvals in AONB rising but with limited 23.4 Report Trend Coast   impact. Approvals in HC falling post adoption. Number of applications approved for wind turbines and Solar Farms in the landscape No applications approved in either designations 23.5 Report Trend designations AONB and Heritage Coast   in the past 3 years. Total no. of listed buildings on the At‐Risk 24.1 Number of listed buildings on the ‘At Risk’ Register Decrease   register decreased. 4 parks awarded green flag status (100% of 25.2 Open space managed to green flag status Maintain or improve accessibility to good quality open space   submitted applications) Number of applications approved contrary to the advice of EA on (i) flooding grounds (ii) Minimal approvals contrary to advice (4 in 16‐ 26 Zero water quality   17). Percentage of people living within 30 minutes of an employment centre employing more Marginal 1% decrease 2014 to 2015 (92% in 27.1 (quoted incorrectly as 85%) than 500 people that use public transport or walk   2015). 2016 data not yet available. Access to facilities defined as access to major 27.2 Access to services and facilities by public transport Increase  ® towns. Dropped 1% from 2014 to 2015

REPORTING STATUS IN YEAR ONE NOTES: OVERALL JUDGEMENT

 Able to report in year 1 (December 2017) This table displays only those indicators that feature in the Annual Monitoring Report in the first year, as  Good originally worded in the Local Plan document. Able to report a revised indicator/measure  Fair ® "Overall Judgement" is a broad, subjective measure, used only as a rudimentary indicator of the observable Indicator under suitability review effect of the policy as currently demonstrated by the data available. As indicators are in reality more detailed  Requires Improvement ® and reasoned judgements will be more nuanced than this, these indicators are included here only to provide a  Partially reported / Reported in non‐standard form quick overview of the perceived performance of the Local Plan as a whole.  Undetermined INDICATOR 2.1 ‐ 38K FULL TIME JOBS BY 2030 (Using No. of F/T employed @ 16yrs+)

1. CURRENT PICTURE TO DATE

DATASET: GROWTH SINCE SOURCE: 10,900 (28.7%) YR F/T JOBS The Annual Population Survey: Workplace is based on the location of 2010 ItAnnual has been Population judged that Survey the ‐ businesses themselves,rather than individual residences. BRES data although Workplace (Jan‐Dec) 2010 168,700 ‐ influence of Policy 2:1 is unlikely more accurate omits both agricultural jobs and the self employed. 'Worker www.nomisweb.co.uk Owners' are also included in the chosen APS source. PROJECTED TO MEET TARGET? 2011 163,500 ‐3.1% to have been felt until 2014. This beingT08: the(Sum case, of FT the Employment average PROJECTIONS/AVERAGES: 2012 171,400 4.8% Age categories ‐ 16+) The influence of Indicator 2:1 may not be felt until after 2016 (post adoption). (Current Av.growth meeting 38k by 2030)  progress towards the target has Average progress towards the target at present has been taken from the last 0 2013 169,900 ‐0.9% been taken from years 2014‐16 95% confidence inverval six years 2010‐16 (assumed average growth of 1,817 per year). Projections into LOCAL PLAN TARGET (38k increase by 2030): 38,000 2014 170,400 0.3% (assumed average growth of assumed of approximately the future are a simple measure used only to estimate progress towards the PROGRESS TO TARGET (Net FT jobs 2010 ‐ present): 10,900 2015 168,900 ‐0.9% 2,26714,000 per jobs year). (actual figure target at the end of the plan period, it is not assumed that this will reflect an PERCENTAGE TOWARDS TARGET: (28.7%) 2016 179,600 6.3% actual trend.

2. NO. IN F/T EMPLOYMENT 2010 ‐ PRESENT (Thousands) 3. TARGET PROJECTION BASED ON CURRENT AVERAGES 4. % EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ‐ (% growth since 2010 by year)

Cornwall South West 185 60 56 8.0% 180 Projection towards target 180 50 based on average growth in last 6.0% 5.1% 6.5% 3yrs: +3,233 per year 4.0% 175 40 (use with caution) 36 4.0% (Thousands) (Thousands)

171 170 170 1.6% 169 170 169 1.8% 30 2.0% 0.8% 165 Growth 164 ‐0.2% 1.0% ‐0.8% FT 20 0.1% 0.0% 160 0.7% Employment Projection towards target based 155 10 on average growth since 2010: ‐2.0% Time +1,817 per year ‐3.1% 150 Projected 0

Full ‐4.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 (Actual) 2030 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

5. % F/T JOB GROWTH VS SOUTH WEST (Year to Year) 6. % F/T GROWTH VS SOUTH WEST (Trend: Year to Year) 7. KEY & SOURCE

Growth by year (SW)% Growth by year (LA)% KEY: 8% 6.5% 2016 Growth by year (LA)% 6.3% Starting point Local Plan Projection based on Projection based on whole plan period 6.3% 6% Growth by year (SW)% 0.1% 6.5% (2010 on) 2015 ‐0.9% 4.8% 4% SOURCE: Annual Population Survey ‐ Workplace 1.0% 2014 www.nomisweb.co.uk 0.3% 2% 0.7% 1.6% Full Time Emloyment by Age (16+) 2013 1.0% ‐0.9% 0.7% 0% 0.3% 0.1% 1.6% ONS Crown Copyright Reserved (27/09/17) 2012 ‐0.9% ‐0.9% 4.8% ‐2% ‐3.1% 2011 Date: All dates Jan‐Dec ‐3.1% ‐3.1% ‐4% Cell: Sum of T08:2,T08:5, T08:8, T08:11 ‐4% ‐2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Confidence : 95% confidence interval (+/‐) INDICATOR 2.4: Approval for 318 residential pitches; 60 Transit pitches; and 11 Show People plots by 2030 (Starting point: Dec 16)

1. CURRENT PICTURE: MEETING INDICATOR 2.4 2. KEY TARGETS AND NET PROGRESS 3. APPROVED PERMISSIONS BY YEAR 4. APPROVED PERMISSIONS: AREA BREAKDOWN

PERM. RES. TRANSIT YR SHOW PPL PLOTS PROGRESSING TOWARDS THE TARGET? PERM. RESIDENTIAL PITCH TARGET (by 2030) 318 PITCHES PITCHES AREA NET GOAL NEEDED (On track against all indicators below)  TRANSIT PITCH TARGET (by 2030) 60 BASELINE 186 12 8 0 SHOWPEOPLE PLOT TARGET (by 2030) 11 2010 ‐11 6 0 0 2011 ‐12 4 0 0 AV. PERM RESIDENTIAL PITCHES (Last 5yrs) 14.8 EAST 0 14 14 AV. REQUIRED TO MEET TARGET 22.3 2012 ‐13 16 10 0 010 NET PERM.RESIDENTIAL PITCHES TO DATE 21 2013 ‐14 14 0 0 AV. NO. TRANSIT PITCHES (Last 5yrs) NET TRANSIT PITCHES TO DATE 15 2014 ‐15 14 0 0 5.0 WEST 4 190 186 AV. REQUIRED TO MEET TARGET 4.2 NET SHOWPEOPLE PLOTS TO DATE 3 2015 ‐16 21 15 3 21 2016 ‐17 9 0 0 AV. SHOWPEOPLE PLOTS (Last 5yrs) 15 2017 ‐18 2 0 0 0.6 MID 17 113 96 would reach target by 2030) 0.8 3 2018 ‐19 0 0 0

5. TRAJECTORY NEEDED TO REACH TARGET VS PROJECTED PROGRESS (Perm. Res. Pitches) 6. APPROVED APPLICATIONS BY YEAR ##

350 25 Projected progress based on 5yr average Perm. Res. Pitches 300 21 321.2 20 Transit Pitches Estimated progress needed to meet target 250 Show People Plots 15 16 15 200 14 14 216.2 150 10 10 9 100 6 5 4 50 3

0 0 00000 0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Actual ‐5

INDICATOR 11: Number and proportion of applications refused on grounds of not complying with policy

7. CURRENT PICTURE: MEETING INDICATOR 11 8. SOURCES / NOTES

SOURCES AND METHOD: Permissions relevant to the above indicators have been identified using the Online Planning search facility‐ http://planning.cornwall.gov.uk/online‐applications ‐ and seaching under NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS REFUSED ON THE terms 'gypsy', 'traveller', 'pitch' and 'day room'. Key information will be entered into the main spreadsheet for any applications that have been approved since the last check. BASIS OF NOT COMPLYING WITH POLICY

DEFINITIONS: MEETING THE INDICATOR? The legal definition of Gypsies and Travellers is notoriously difficult ‐ however here they can be defined as: (No refusals from Local Plan Adoption) (a) persons with a cultural tradition of nomadism or of living in a caravan; and,  (b) all other persons of a nomadic habit of life, whatever their race or origin, including members of an organised group of Travelling Showpeople or Circus people (whether or not travelling together as such).

OVERALL NO. REJECTED 13 A 'pitch' can be thought of broadly as a small area of land that will typically accomodate 2 caravans (be they static or touring). Often ,pitches will be used by a single family, and the family will live in the static (Based on historic data available) caravan while in the area and use the tourer when roaming. 'Number of Caravans' here makes no distinction between static and mobile (e.g. permission for two tourers and two static caravans would be recorded as 2 pitches and 4 caravans). 'Showpeople' can be defined as othose wh travel to put on shows, such as travelling circusses and fairs. Transit pitches refers to areas of land that are used for the NO. REJECTED SINCE LP ADOPTION specific purpose of accomodating show paraphanalia(rides/equipment etc). The 'Baseline' refered to in the dashboard refers to all permissions approved, refused or appoved on appeal prior to the 1 indentification of the key targets in the related needs assessment. This means that any permission approved after the publication of the needs assessment will contribute towards the target. Planning (November 2016 onwards) permission approvals have been used as the measure of delivery as this is the most reliable available measure. This assumes that 2 caravans equals a pitch unless otherwise stated in the permission. Odd numbers are rounded up to the next pitch (i.e. a permission for 3 caravans would be recorded as 2 pitches). INDICATOR 2.5 ‐ COMMUNAL ESTABLISHMENT PROVISION ‐ DELIVERY OF 2,550 BED SPACES IN RESIDENTIAL/NURSING HOMES

1. CURRENT PICTURE: MEETING THE INDICATOR 2. KEY FIGURES ‐ RESIDENTIAL BED CAPACITY (Permissions Dat 3. PLANNING APPLICATION STATUS BY YEAR (No.of Beds) 4. DATA SOURCES AND NOTES

NET NO. OF BEDS NET NO. OF BEDS DUE PERMISSION YEAR DATA SOURCES: PROGRESSION TOWARDS THE TARGET: TARGET BED SPACES 2,550 DELIVERED FROM PERMISSIONS (Net delivery of beds positive AND on course NET TOTAL BEDS DELIVERED SINCE 2010 ‐22 2010 0 0 Bed capacity figures taken from either the Care Quality Commission's to meet the target by 2030)  NET GAIN PROMISED FROM ACTIVE PERMISSI 346 2011 0 ‐7 monthly reports on active care providers, or in‐house planning 100 DELIVERED BEDS + PROMISED PERMISSIONS 324 2012 1 44 permissions data. Individual tables/charts indicate which dataset has been used. NET BEDS SINCE START OF PLAN PERIOD: RESIDUAL BEDS TO REACH TARGET* 2,226 2013 ‐30 0 324 (Beds delivered by development + beds to % BEDS TOWARDS TARGET 13% 2014 38 ‐37 NOTES: come according to active permissions) *Assuming all active permissions will be delivered 2015 250Throughout, all figures represent Cornwall unless otherwise stated. 'Beds' refers to the bed capacity of approved providers and does not MEETING THE 2,500 TARGET BY 2030? 2016 015 No 324 indicate current occupancy levels. (Based on av. beds completed + permissions) 2017 ‐33 209

5. CURRENT SNAPSHOT ‐ PERMISSIONS & COMPLETIONS 6. PROJECTED NEED vs ACTUAL BED GROWTH BY YEAR 7. NO. OF RESIDENTIAL BEDS IN COUNTY BY YEAR 8. NO. OF RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES IN COUNTY BY YEAR (SOURCE: In‐House Data ‐ Oct 2017) (SOURCE: Edge Analytics (Projections), CQC data (Actual) (SOURCE: Care Quality Commission(ACTIVE PROVIDERS)) (SOURCE: Care Quality Commission)

250 150 227 2010‐11 2011‐12 5,000 170 2012‐13 2013‐14 100 4,900 200 2014‐15 2015‐16 165 2016‐17 2017‐18 50 4,800 150 160 4,700 0 100 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 4,600 155 60 ‐50 46 44 38 4,500 4,919 150 50 4,805 4,840 162 163 164 4 1 2 ‐100 4,400 4,734 4,608 145 157 0 4,513 153 ‐150 Actual 4,300 149 Outline Extant‐7 Full U/C Completed 4,432 147 ‐18 4,200 140 ‐50 ‐30 ‐33 ‐200 Projected ‐37‐45 4,100 135 ‐100 ‐250 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

9. NET PLANNING PERMISSIONS APPROVED OVER TIME 10. NET OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSIONS APPROVED 11. NET FULL PLANNING PERMISSIONS APPROVED 12. NET BED CAPACITY OF NEWLY DEVELOPED SITES (All categories ‐ Net Beds available when completed) (No. Beds in Permission / Beds available when completed) (No. Beds in Permission / Beds available when completed) (Beds available on sites completed in a given year)

250 250 227 50 50 44 40 40 200 200 38 30 30 150 20 150 20 100 10 4 10 100 0 0 50 60 0 1 2 0 46 ‐102011‐7 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 50 ‐102011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 0 ‐20 ‐18 0000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ‐20 ‐50 0 ‐30 ‐37 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ‐40 ‐30 ‐30 ‐100 ‐45 ‐33 ‐50 ‐50 ‐40 Outline Extant Full U/C INDICATOR 2.5 ‐ COMMUNAL ESTABLISHMENT PROVISION ‐ DELIVERY OF 2,550 BED SPACES IN RESIDENTIAL/NURSING HOMES

13. BED PROVISION AT BEGINNING OF PLAN PERIOD (Earliest available data ‐ 2011) 14. BED PROVISION TO DATE (April 2017 ‐ CQC data)

NOTES:

Progress towards the Local Plan target of 2,550 care home beds by 2030 is based on the current completions plus beds promised from active planning permissions, projected forward for the remaining planning period. It is likely that not all active permissions will go forward and planning permissions can be subject to change in what they deliver.

PERMISSION TYPES:

Different permission types are an indicator of both the stage of the development process and the liklihood that a build will go ahead as described in the application. The Application for an "Outline" Planning Permission is generally used to find out at an early stage whether or not a proposal is likely to be approved by the planning authority before any substantial costs are incurred. This type of planning application allows fewer details about the proposal to be submitted, and fewer details may be agreed following a “reserved matters” application at a later stage. Once outline planning permission has been granted, a ’reserved matters’ application must be made within three years of the consent (or a lesser period if specified by a condition on the original outline approval. This means that an outline permission often includes less information on the build, and details are more susceptable to change.

A "Full" planning permission is more detailed, where all matters concerning the development will have been agreed. Generally, an approved full planning permission will be started within three years, as after three years the permission will expire. However, if a development begins on site the permission will never expire.

CQC Data:

Yearly CQC used in the above tables and graphs is taken from data downloads at the same point each year (November or December). At the time of writing, for 2017 April data has been used in lieu of the Nov/Dec release). NET CARE HOME BEDS: COMPLETIONS AND PERMISSIONS

Net number of care home beds with an active planning permission that are yet to be completed: 351 Net number of care home beds completed since 2010 (minus demolitions or changes of use): -22

NET CARE HOME BEDS ACCORDING TO PERMISSIONS ONLY (GAINS MINUS LOSSES, OMITTING EXPIRED PERMISSIONS)

Status Total since

2010/11 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 Outline 333 46 60 227 Extant 5 5 Full -59 -7 44 -37 4 -45 -18 U/C Total Active 279 -2 44 -37 50 15 209 Expired 71 71 Completed -22 1 -30 38 2 -33

Active planning Permissions to result in a GAIN in Care Home Beds by approval year: Outline 372 85 60 227 Extant 5 5 Full 98 53 12 4 10 19 U/C Total Active 475 5 53 12 89 70 246 Expired 71 71 Completed 44 1 38 5

Active planning Permissions to result in a LOSS in Care Home Beds by approval year: Outline 39 39 Extant Full 157 7 9 49 55 37 U/C Total Active 196 7 9 49 39 55 37 Expired Completed66 30333

Completions and Active Permissions by Community Network Area Net No. Beds Gain due from active Loses due from active Beds Completed + Net COMMUNITY NETWORK AREA Delivered permissions permissions Permissions -40 -40 -37 -37 , Pool, Illogan & 29 -15 14 Caradon 40 40 China Clay 5 5 Cornwall Gateway -18 92 -3 71 Falmouth & Penryn 87 87 & St Ives 58 -39 19 & South Kerrier 5 -9 -4 Launceston & & St Columb -9 64 -23 32 St Agnes & Perranporth -30 -30 & Mevagissey 10 10 , & 40 40 and Roseland -3 74 71 & -21 72 51 West Penwith NET CARE HOME BEDS: COMPLETIONS AND PERMISSIONS

CARE HOME BED GAINS / LOSES BY YEAR (COMPLETIONS)

50

40 38 30 20

10 0 0 0 1 2 0 -10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 -20 -30 -30 -33 -40

METHODOLOGY NOTES AND CAVEATS

It should be noted that for a number of reasons recording the net number of care home beds for the elderly is problematic, and all figures quoted are a best guess given the available information. While the figures provide an indication of trends, these figures should be interpreted with caution due to the following:

• It is often very difficult to find information regarding the loss of care home beds for the elderly, as this is information that has not been tracked and is more often than not removed from information sources once the home has closed. As we are interested in net care home beds for the elderly, it is necessary to know how many beds were available at each facility.

• Care homes often do not exclusively provide care for the elderly, and instead offer a mix of care for younger people, people with learning disabilities, nursing care for people with physical disabilities etc. Again this makes it difficult to assess just how many beds for elderly accommodation have been lost. Provision for these categories are also not mutually exclusive; a resident can be in all of these categories in addition to being over 65.

• Information given on the application form often differs from information found online, such as care home sites and the CQC. Often the description in the planning application will reference ‘care home’ where further investigation categorises the provision differently.

• Where terms such as ‘nursing home’ are used it is often not clear whether they are to be exclusively for elderly people, for people with some physical/learning disability or a mix.

• Changes of use can reference that the site was ‘a former care home’. Notwithstanding the difficulties outlined above with regard the provision itself, it is also difficult to know whether this can be considered a care home loss, as the care home may have been closed for a number of years. Additionally, if it is to be observed as a loss it can be unclear when this should be attributed as having happened.

For the purposes of analysis, all provision noted to include care home beds for the elderly have been included in the figures for both gains and losses. Losses as described in the previous point are included against the year of the current planning application. INDICATOR 6.1: PROVISION OF HOUSING FOR HOUSEHOLDS WITH SPECIFIC NEEDS: CONTEXT (Inc. Settings with facilities for Dementia, Mental Health, Learning Disabiliies and Physical Disabilities).

Dementia facilites Mental Health Facilites Learning Disability Facilites Physical Disability Facilites 120 85 110 95 112 112 79 79 111 111 89 90 108 108 108 80 76 98 110 100 95 90 72 73 72 94 94 92 75 71 90 90 83 68 68 85 82 100 70 90 80 65 78 79 80 77 85 85 60 59 59 90 57 80 73 7473 73 60 70 69 75 71 72 71 78 78 77 66 70 80 74 55 51 70 64 60 70 69 50 70 60 Within Care Homes Within Care Homes Within Care Homes Within Care Homes 65 45 Elsewhere Elsewhere Elsewhere Elsewhere 60 40 50 60 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

BREAKDOWNS: NUMBER OF SETTINGS WITH FACILITY NUMBER OF SETTINGS WITH FACILITY (ALL SETTINGS)

200 197 145 175 165 162 196 160 139 140 139 138 168 168 169 195 140 170 160 135 154 154 189 163 190 135 165 155 186 150 151 185 129 158 158 147 185 182 130 160 150 181 124 155 180 125 155 145

175 120 150 140

170 115 145 135 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NUMBER OF SETTINGS WITH FACILITY (EXC. CARE HOMES)

90 80 90 100 90 68 68 78 79 89 85 85 83 82 70 80 70 69 90 80 85 60 59 59 66 77 74 57 70 64 80 60 51 60 78 78 70 80 77 60 50 60 74 50 75 40 50 40 69 30 40 70 30 30 20 20 20 65 10 10 10

60 0 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NUMBER OF CARE HOMES WITH FACILITY

113 80 79 79 100 74 112 112 98 73 73 73 78 98 112 73 111 111 76 72 111 76 96 95 94 94 72 110 74 73 94 71 71 72 72 92 71 109 72 71 92 70 90 90 108 108 108 70 108 70 90

69 107 68 88

106 66 86 68 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 OVERVIEW OF HOUSING STOCK IN CORNWALL BY NUMBER OF DWELLINGS AND HOUSE TYPE % Breakdown of Dwellings in Cornwall Number of Dwellings in Cornwall by Type (2015‐2017) by No. of Bedrooms (2017) 45.0% 41.2% (2017) 40.0% 70,000 66,000 65,450 35.0% 30.0% 64,690 30.0% Dwellings 25.0% 56,590 of 56,500 60,000 56,370 20.0% 16.2% 52,480 No. 51,840 15.0% 51,220 9.2%

10.0% 50,000 46,620 45,940 45,380 5.0% 0.0% 37,600 37,120 1234+ 40,000 36,590 No. of Bedrooms (All housing types)

Total Gain in Dwellings in Cornwall by 30,000

2017) No. Bedrooms (2015 to 2017) 1,910

to 2,000 20,000

1,800

(2015 1,600 1,450

1,400 1,200 10,000 4,290 4,240 4,200 2,930 2,910 1,200 2,940 1,250 1,130 1,000 1,020 Dwellings 800 0 480 new 600

of

400 200 No. 0 1234+ House Type Total 2015 House Type Total 2016 House Type Total 2017 No. of Bedrooms (All housing types)

Comparision Chart: % Housing Stock by No. of Bedrooms (Cornwall vs South West/England)

England 11.9% 27.9% 43.0% 14.8%

South West 10.9% 27.8% 41.6% 17.0%

LA 9.2% 30.0% 41.2% 16.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedroom

COMPARISION CHARTS: No. BEDROOMS % BREAKDOWN (Cornwall vs South West/England)

BUNGALOWS: Percentage split by number of bedrooms ENG Breakdown 11.8% 49.6% 31.9% 6.5%

SW Breakdown 9.0% 45.8% 37.2% 7.9%

LA Breakdown 8.4% 39.2% 43.9% 8.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FLAT/MAISONETTES: Percentage split by number of bedrooms ENG Breakdown 44.5% 44.1% 7.6% 1.9%

SW Breakdown 45.5% 45.8% 6.1% 1.8%

LA Breakdown 45.4% 45.0% 7.2% 2.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% TERRACED HOUSING: Percentage split by number of bedrooms ENG Breakdown 1.9% 32.8% 56.1% 8.9%

SW Breakdown 2.4% 33.4% 54.7% 9.4%

LA Breakdown 2.7% 38.1% 49.8% 9.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SEMI‐DETACHED HOUSING: Percentage split by number of bedrooms ENG Breakdown 0.4% 15.4% 73.4% 10.6%

SW Breakdown 0.7% 16.3% 70.8% 12.1%

LA Breakdown 1.5% 23.7% 62.3% 12.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% DETACHED HOUSING: Percentage split by number of bedrooms ENG Breakdown 0.2% 4.5% 37.5% 57.2%

SW Breakdown 0.4% 6.3% 37.2% 55.7%

LA Breakdown 0.9% 9.8% 40.1% 49.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

0.2%4.5% 37.5% 57.2% 0.4% 6.3% 37.2% 55.7% 0.9% 9.8%1 Bedrooms 40.1%2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 49.2% 4+ Bedrooms 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% COMPARISION CHARTS: No. BEDROOMS % BREAKDOWN (2015 Stock vs New Stock*)

BUNGALOWS: No of Bedrooms Breakdown (2015 total tock vs newly developed) % New bungalow 13.6% 22.7% 27.3% 36.4% housing stock at 2017

% Total bungalow 8.4% 39.2% 43.9% 8.4% housing stock at 2015

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedrooms

FLAT/MAISONETTE: No of Bedrooms Breakdown (2015 total tock vs newly developed) % New Flat/Maisonette 42.6% 56.4% 2.0% housing stock at 2017

% Total Flat/Maisonette 45.2% 44.4% 7.4% 2.4% housing stock at 2015

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedrooms

TERRACED: No of Bedrooms Breakdown (2015 total tock vs newly developed) % New terraced 0.8% 31.8% 56.1% 10.6% housing stock at 2017

% Total terraced 2.8% 38.2% 49.7% 9.3% housing stock at 2015

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedrooms

SEMI‐DETACHED: No of Bedrooms Breakdown (2015 total tock vs newly developed) % New semi‐detached 29.0% 53.2% 17.7% housing stock at 2017 % Total semi‐detached 2% 24% 63% 12% housing stock at 2015

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedrooms

DETACHED: No of Bedrooms Breakdown (2015 total tock vs newly developed) % New detached 0.8% 4.0% 34.4% 60.8% housing stock at 2017 % Total detached 0.9% 9.9% 40.2% 48.9% housing stock at 2015

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4+ Bedrooms INDICATOR 6.3 ‐ PROVISION OF SELF‐BUILD AND CUSTOM BUILD HOUSING (Last Updated November 2017)

1. HEADLINE FIGURES 3. LEVEL OF INTEREST IN CUSTOM/SELF BUILD (REGISTRATIONS4. % REGISTRATIONS WITH LOCAL CONNECTIONS

400 NUMBER OF PLOTS: IND. VS ASSOC. REGISTRATIONS TOTAL REGISTRATIONS MADE: 412 350 364 Total inc. muliple 300 TOTAL INDIVIDUAL REGISTRATIONS 406 entries 157, Gave at least one local 250 connection TOTAL ASSOCIATION REGISTRATIONS: 6 67 Total excl. 38% 200 multiple entries 150 348 255, TOTAL PLOTS REPRESENTED: 473 406 Gave no local connection 100 63 62% 50 TOTAL INDIVIDUAL PLOTS: 406 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 47 TOTAL ASSOCIATION PLOTS: 67 VERY QUITE

5. NUMBER OF SELF‐BUILD REGISTRATIONS OF INTEREST MADE: 6. MOST POPULAR AREA OF INTEREST (AGGREGATED CATEGORIES) (Blue = Inidividual Registrations, Red: Association of Individuals): (Those 'Very interested' in an Individual Self Build, Individual Plot, and Detached House or Bungalow[Blue] vs Other)

406 6 359 53

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

7. POPULARITY OF INTEREST BY AREA (By preference) 8. THOSE IN MOST LARPOPU AGGREGATED CATEGORY (ABOVE) WITH INTEREST IN THE MOST POPULAR AREA (Wadebridg

160 No. of registrations identifying a CNA as a possible Self Build Location 140 71 12 30 3rd Choice 2nd Choice 0 102030405060708090 120 1st Choice

100 38 9. MOST LIKELY METHOD OF FINANCING 10. NO. WHO WOULD CONSIDER A SCHEME BUILD (Some respondents made multiple selections) (*'Unsure' is a catch‐all category for similar entries ‐ i.e. 'Maybe') 80 19 24 NO UNSURE* YES 300 60 20 100% 26 34 90% 18 250 11 10 80% 40 83 7 19 108 25 131 8 16 70% 14 12 10

14 1222 200 a

190

31 60% 12 7

16 with 43 13 13 277

20 15 35 10 50% 41 25 25 5 4 23 19 23 1 6 7 5 8 150 with 36 18 15 16 1212 15 4 40% 9 7 6 5 4 0 3 30% Housing

19 Owned

&… &… &… &… outright,

St… 100

a 20% 132

109 189 and… Owned mortgage, Clay & 10% Association, 69 Bude West… Part

Blazey,… 50 0% Bodmin Agnes Caradon Cornwall… Austell Newquay… St Falmouth… Owned

Truro Shared Community Land Co‐Housing Helston Hayle China Liskeard Camelford St Camborne,… Wadebridg… Launceston St 0 Ownership Trust Project INDICATOR 6.3 ‐ PROVISION OF SELF‐BUILD AND CUSTOM BUILD HOUSING

11. NO. OF REGISTRATIONS EXPRESSING INTEREST IN SPECIFIC BUILD TYPES (Note: Some respondents made more than one selection) 12. PREFERRED MINIMUM SIZE FOR BUILD

400 376 400 400 399 160 374 Detached Individual Plot 350 Individual Self or Custom Build 350 Semi‐detached/ Terraced 350 140 Group Self or Custom Build Individual Plot as part of larger Bungalow 120 300 300 developer led scheme Developer Led Custom Build 300 Apartment as part of larger scheme Community led or Collective Self 100 Other 250 Other 250 236 250 Build 80 Other 145 150 200 200 200 60 121 126 155 145 88 150 150 150 40 87 20 100 100 100 39 22 22 0 50 9 50 19 27 50 Up to 150m2 to 201m2 to 251m2 to More 150m2 200m2 250m2 300m2 than 0 0 0 301m2

13. MINIMUM NUMBER OF BEDROOMS FOR BUILD 14. MINIMUM NUMBER OF BEDROOMS FOR BUILD 15. READINESS TO START ONCE APPROPRIATE SITE IS FOUND10. READINESS TO START ONCE SITE (All selections ‐ including multiple selections) (Sole and multiple selections) (All selections ‐ including multiple selections) (Sole and multiple selections)

250 250 300 300 1 bed 294 248 As part of a muliple entry Sole entries 2 bed Less than 1 year 46 250 Sole entries 64 250 1 to 2 years 200 3 bed 200 3 to 5 years As part of a multiple selection 4+ bed 200 More than 5 years 200 150 150 150 141 150 118 107 248 100 100 35 56 184 100 48 100

50 50 50 17 26 83 50 37 85 6 11 59 7 15 20 0 0 1 0 0 1 bed 2 bed 3 bed 4+ bed < 1 yr 1‐2yrs 3‐5yrs 5+ yrs

SOURCE:The majority of data included above is sourced from entries made via an online web form or bespoke word form: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/environment‐and‐planning/planning/planning‐policy/adopted‐plans/evidence‐base/self‐and‐custom‐build/ The self build year runs from 1st Nov ‐ 31st Oct. The self build register became a requirement in April 2015‐16 therefore only partial data is available in this year. This data forms the 'Baseline' ‐ and will be used in lieu of a full years data for comparison. CNA derived from parish referenced on registration. Where an incorrect CNA for a parish has been used this has been amended where possible. Data includes entries where only CNA has been given.

NOTES: Throughout the analysis, the terms 'Self Build' and 'Custom Build' are treated as synonymous and interchangable. 'Sole entries' refers to fields wherby it is possible for respondents to make more that one selection, but they have only chosen to select a single option (indicating a strong preference). 'As part of a multipe entry' indicates where a selection has been counted forwards the total for that field, but the respondant also made other selections (e.g. for 'Minimum number of bedrooms' the respondent selected both ''1 bed' and '2 bed'.)

The online form was redesigned in Novemeber 2017. For the year 2017‐18 onwards, the majoriity of registrations will have been made using the redesigned form. The fields remain the same, but elements such as preferences and area selections will have been amended in order to increase the validity and usefulness of results. SELECT MONTH INDICATOR 14: RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION SEP 17

ALL ELECT HEAT TOTAL OUTPUT

TOTAL RENEWABLE OUTPUT LARGE SCALE SOLAR (>1MW) 453.842 453.842 (ALL) 900.000 TOTAL RENEWABLE ENERGY HEAT WIND 141.977 141.977 772.919 800.000 SMALL SCALE SOLAR PV 87.66 87.66 TOTAL RENEWABLE OUTPUT 700.000 ELECTRICITY BIOMASS 51.400 51.400 (ELECTRICITY) 600.000 702.109 LANDFILL GAS 13.870 13.870 500.000 TOTAL RENEWABLE OUTPUT HEAT PUMPS 12.660 12.660 (HEAT) 400.000 SOLAR THERMAL 2.790 2.790 70.810 300.000 HYDRO 1.760 1.760 200.000 TOTAL RENEWABLE OUTPUT (APR SEWAGE GAS 1.460 0.500 0.960 16) 100.000 645.061 DEEP GEOTHERMAL 0.000 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17 NET OUTPUT GROWTH FROM (Apr ANAEROBIC DIGESTION 4.500 1.500 3.000 16) ENERGY FROM WASTE 20* 127.858

800.000 TOP 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN CORNWALL ENERGY OUTPUT BREAKDOWN: SEP 17 700.000 Large scale solar (> 1 MW) Large scale solar (> 1 MW) 600.000 Wind Wind 141.977, 18% 87.66, 11% Small Scale Solar PV 500.000 Small Scale Solar PV Biomass 13.87, 2% 51.4, 7% 12.66, 2% 400.000 Landfill Gas Heat Pumps 300.000 23.17, 3% Solar Thermal 2.79, 0% 200.000 Hydro 1.76, 0% 453.842, 59% 100.000 1.46, 0% Sewage Gas 4.5 Deep Geothermal 0.000 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17 Anaerobic Digestion Energy from Waste

600.000 SOLAR ENERGY (SMALL & LARGE SCALE) 7.000 ANEROBIC ENERGY DIGESTION ENERGY Large scale solar (> 1 MW) ELECTRICITY 6.000 500.000 Small Scale Solar PV HEAT 5.000 400.000

4.000 300.000 3.000

200.000 2.000

100.000 1.000

0.000 0.000 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17

60.000 BIOMASS ENERGY 16.000 LANDFILL GAS ENERGY

14.000 50.000 12.000 40.000 10.000

30.000 8.000

6.000 20.000 4.000 10.000 2.000

0.000 0.000 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17

14.000 HEAT PUMPS ENERGY 1.770 HYRDO ENERGY

1.760 12.000 1.750 10.000 1.740

8.000 1.730

6.000 1.720

1.710 4.000 1.700 2.000 1.690

0.000 1.680 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY 14 JUN 14 JUL 14 AUG SEP 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY 17 JUN 17 JUL 17 AUG SEP 17 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY 14 JUN 14 JUL 14 AUG SEP 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY 17 JUN 17 JUL 17 AUG SEP 17

3.000 SOLAR THERMAL ENERGY 1.600 SEWAGE GAS ENERGY HEAT 1.400 2.500 ELECTRICITY 1.200 2.000 1.000

1.500 0.800

0.600 1.000 0.400 0.500 0.200

0.000 0.000 JAN 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY 14 JUN 14 JUL 14 AUG SEP 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY 17 JUN 17 JUL 17 AUG SEP 17 14 JAN FEB 14 14 MAR 14 APR 14 MAY JUNE 14 14 JULY 14 AUG SEPT 14 OCT 14 14 NOV 14 DEC 15 JAN FEB 15 15 MAR 15 APR 15 MAY JUNE 15* 15 JULY 15 AUG SEPT 15 OCT 15 15 NOV 15 DEC 16 JAN FEB 16 16 MAR 16 APR 16 MAY JUNE 16 16 JULY 16 AUG SEPT 16 OCT 16 16 NOV 16 DEC 17 JAN FEB 17 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY JUNE 17 17 JULY 17 AUG SEP 17 INDICATOR 23.3 - % of SSSIs IN A FAVOURABLE OR RECOVERING CONDITION

1. CURRENT PICTURE: MEETING THE INDICATOR 2. % SSSI SITES FAVOURABLE OR RECOVERING 3. % SSSI AREA FAVOURABLE OR RECOVERING 4. % SSSI SITES FAVOURABLE OR RECOVERING (Base Period 2011-2013 to Present) (Base Period 2011-2013 to Present) (Previous year to Present)

MEETING THE INDICATOR: PERCENTAGE SITES FAVOURABLE OR PERCENTAGE AREA FAVOURABLE OR PERCENTAGE AREA FAVOURABLE OR 83% 85% 85.2% % SSSI sites assessed as 'Favourable' or RECOVERING AT PRESENT (2017) RECOVERING AT PRESENT (2017) RECOVERING AT PRESENT (2017) 'recovering' improved against base period AND PERCENTAGE SITES FAVOURABLE OR PERCENTAGE AREA FAVOURABLE OR PERCENTAGE AREA FAVOURABLE OR 85% 96% RECOVERING LAST YR (Cummulative) 86.2% %of area(ha) improved against base period RECOVERING IN BASE PERIOD RECOVERING IN BASE PERIOD

PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT -1.1% -10.9% -0.9% 0  BASE PERIOD - PRESENT BASE PERIOD - PRESENT BASE PERIOD - PRESENT

5. OTHER KEY FIGURES 6. PERCENTAGE FAVOURABLE OR RECOVERING (CUMMULATIVE) 7. % ASSESSED AS FAVOURABLE OR RECOVERING BY YEAR (Total number and area of sites inc. those not yet assessed) (% Sites and % Area) (% Sites and % Area)

100% TOTAL NO. SSSI SITES IN CORNWALL 140 87% 85.2% 95% 92% TOTAL AREA OF SSSI SITES IN CORNWALL 22060 86% 85.5% TOTAL NO. OF SSSI SITES NOT YET ASSESSED 37 90% 85% TOTAL AREA OF SSSI SITES NOT YET ASSESSED 1657.01 85% 84% 83.4% 80% 8. DISTRIBUTION OF SSSI CONDITIONS IN CORNWALL TO DATE 83% 75% 70% 81.8% 70% Favourable Recovering No Change 82% Declining Partially Destroyed Destroyed 65% 81% Not Assessed 60% % Sites 80% 55% 51% # 131 26367 32 3 1131 # 26 32 37 % Sites % Area % Sites 79% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 COUNT OF SITES SUM OF AREA (Ha) Assessments in specific year All 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 All 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 All Favourable 367 170 30 41 15 31 14 7 5 10,074 5,495 964 508 358 1,009 274 242 229 All recovering 131 49 10 19 11 21 10 3 2 7,874 4,594 409 346 186 1,536 521 43 58 All Favourable or Recovering 498 219 40 60 26 52 24 10 7 17,949 10,089 1,373 854 544 2,545 795 285 286 Count of sites/ha (all assessed) 560 239 47 67 35 61 26 10 10 19,407 10,333 1,499 981 965 2,776 815 285 562 Count of sites/ha (inc. not assessed) 597 239 47 67 35 61 26 10 10 21,064 10,333 1,499 981 965 2,776 815 285 562 Percentage Fav/Rec in year (all assessed) 89% 92% 85% 90% 74% 85% 92% 100% 70% 92% 98% 92% 87% 56% 92% 98% 100% 51% Percentage Fav/Rec in year (all) 83% 92% 85% 90% 74% 85% 92% 100% 70% 85% 98% 92% 87% 56% 92% 98% 100% 51% Assessments (Cummulative) All 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 All 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 All favourable (Cummulative) 367 224 254 295 310 341 355 362 367 10,074 6,491 7,455 7,963 8,321 9,329 9,604 9,846 10,074 All recovering (Cummulative) 131 55 65 84 95 116 126 129 131 7,874 4,775 5,184 5,530 5,716 7,252 7,773 7,817 7,874 All Favourable or Recovering (Cummulative) 498 279 319 379 405 457 481 491 498 17,949 11,266 12,639 13,493 14,037 16,582 17,377 17,662 17,949 Count of sites/ha (cummulative-all assessed) 560 304 351 418 453 514 540 550 560 19,407 11,524 13,022 14,003 14,968 17,744 18,559 18,845 19,407 Count of sites/ha (Cummulative - all) 597 341 388 455 490 551 577 587 597 21,064 13,181 14,679 15,660 16,625 19,401 20,216 20,502 21,064 Percentage Fav/Rec (Cummul. - all assessed) 88.9% 91.8% 90.9% 90.7% 89.4% 88.9% 89.1% 89.3% 88.9% 92.5% 97.8% 97.1% 96.4% 93.8% 93.4% 93.6% 93.7% 92.5% Percentage Fav/Rec (Cummulative-all) 83.4% 81.8% 82.2% 83.3% 82.7% 82.9% 83.4% 83.6% 83.4% 85.2% 85.5% 86.1% 86.2% 84.4% 85.5% 86.0% 86.2% 85.2%

NOTES: For monitoring purposes, a base period of assessments made between 2011-2013 has been used. 2010 has not been included due to the disproportionate number of assessments accredited to that year (239 sites accounting for 11,524ha have an assessment dated 2010. By comparision, the year that yeilded the second greatest number of assessments (2012), totalled only 65 sites accounting for 852ha. Therefore it is likely that 2010 figures are due to a data cleansing excerise or similar). 2017 figures are true at the time of reporting (1st June 2017). Note that headline percentages include those 'not assessed' in the denominator. This means it is arguable that percentages in the 'All' category are depressed slightly as those not assessed are essentially counted negatively. INDICATOR 23.4: Number of new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Coast (TREND OVER TIME: No. of dwellings approved in AONB and HC areas by Community Network Area by Year)

BODMIN BUDE CAMBORNE, POOL & REDRUTH CAMELFORD CARADON 4.50 16.00 2.50 50.00 12.00 11 4.00 4 14.00 14 45.00 44 10.00 13 2.00 2 40.00 3.50 12.00 40 3.00 35.00 8.00 10.00 1.50 30.00 2.50 8.00 25.00 6.00 6 2.00 5 6.00 6 1.00 1 20.00 20 1.50 4.00 15.00 17 4.00 4 13 1.00 11 0.50 11 3 10.00 2.00 2.00 0.50 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 000 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

CHINA CLAY CORNWALL GATEWAY FALMOUTH & PENRYN HAYLE & ST.IVES HELSTON & THE LIZARD 1.00 20.00 100.00 3.50 80.00 19 0.90 18.00 90.00 86 3.00 3 70.00 69 69 0.80 16.00 80.00 60.00 60 0.70 14.00 70.00 69 2.50 0.60 12.00 50.00 60.00 2.00 2 46 48 0.50 10.00 10 50.00 40.00 1.50 0.40 8.00 8 40.00 7 30.00 0.30 6.00 30.00 1.00 1 1 20.00 0.20 4.00 20.00 15 0.50 0.10 2.00 10.00 10.00 11 1 0.00 000 0.00 0 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

LAUNCESTON LISKEARD & LOOE NEWQUAY & ST COLUMB ST AGNES & PERRANPORTH ST AUSTELL & MEVAGISSEY 12.00 12.00 1.00 25.00 35.00 11 11 11 0.90 10.00 10.00 30.00 0.80 20.00 20 29 0.70 25.00 8.00 8.00 8 0.60 15.00 14 20.00 6.00 6 6.00 6 0.50 13 11 5 0.40 10.00 15.00 15 14 4.00 4.00 4 0.30 10.00 0.20 2.00 2.00 5.00 0.10 3 3 5.00 1 3 2 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 1 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 123 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

ST BLAZEY, FOWEY & LOSTWITHIEL TRURO & ROSELAND WADEBRIDGE & PADSTOW WEST PENWITH KEY & NOTES 18.00 14.00 60.00 140.00 13 No. Approved in AONB No. Approved in HC 16.00 16 12.00 50.00 120.00 120 48 14.00 11 Individual charts represent the trend over time and 10.00 100.00 12.00 40.00 should not be directly compared as they will have 10.00 8.00 80.00 differing scales. 9 30.00 67 68 8.00 8 6.00 6 60.00 60 7 23 Figures represent the total number of dwellings 6.00 5 20.00 20 49 approved in permissions between 2014‐15 to 2016‐ 4.00 40.00 4.00 17 financial year, including appeals approved 3 10.00 2.00 20.00 within those times. 2.00 2 7 22 5 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 INDICATOR 23.4: No. new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Coast

No. of Dwellings approved in designations by Community Network Area

COMMUNITY NETWORK No. Permissions granted in AONB No. Permissions granted in Heritage Coast AREA TOTAL 2015 2016 2017 TOTAL 2015 2016 2017 Bodmin 61140000 Bude 20 3 13 4 23 3 14 6 Camborne, Pool & Redruth 32103210 Camelford 77 13 20 44 68 11 17 40 Caradon 2265110000 China Clay 00000000 Cornwall Gateway 36101979081 Falmouth & Penryn 1708615690000 Hayle & St Ives 61326132 Helston & the Lizard 198 69 69 60 105 46 48 11 Launceston 28611110000 Liskeard & Looe 25 11 6 8 10 5 1 4 Newquay & St Columb 00000000 St Agnes & Perranporth 20 3 14 3 44 11 20 13 St Austell & Mevagissey 581529146312 St Blazey, Fowey & Lostwithie 32 7 16 9 12 2 2 8 Truro & Roseland 306 1311102 5 3 Wadebridge & Padstow 91 20 23 48 16 5 4 7 West Penwith 177 49 68 60 247 67 120 60 TOTALS 999 308 326 365 559 158 244 157

No. of Dwellings approved in designations by Parish

No. Permissions granted in AONB No. Permissions granted in Heritage Coast PARISH TOTAL 2015 2016 2017 TOTAL 2015 2016 2017 Advent Altarnun 25 5 10 10 Antony 211 Blisland 6114 Boconnoc Bodmin Botus Fleming 4121 Boyton Breage 12345 Broadoak Bude-Stratton Budock 55 Calstock 20 6 4 10 Camborne 11 11 Camelford Cardinham Carharrack Carlyon Carn Brea Chacewater Colan Constantine 211 Crantock Crowan Page 1 of 5 INDICATOR 23.4: No. new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Coast

Cubert Cuby Cury 13 8 5 13 8 5 Davidstow Deviock Dobwalls And Trewidland Duloe Egloshayle Egloskerry Falmouth Feock 14167 Forrabury And Minster 20 1 10 9 20 1 10 9 Fowey 26 3 15 8 12 2 2 8 Germoe Gerrans 21 121 1 Grade-Ruan 104337223 Grampound With Creed Gunwalloe 52125212 Gweek 11 Gwennap Gwinear-Gwithian Hayle Helland Helston Illogan Jacobstow Kea 321 Kenwyn Kilkhampton 32 132 1 Ladock Landewednack 34 30 2 2 34 30 2 2 Landrake With St. Erney Landulph 4211 Laneast Lanhydrock Lanivet Lanlivery Lanner Lanreath Lansallos 73137313 Lanteglos 43 132 1 Launcells Launceston Lawhitton Rural Lesnewth Lewannick Lezant 21 1 Linkinhorne 11 Liskeard Looe Lostwithiel Ludgvan 532 532 Luxulyan Mabe Madron 1432943 1 Maker-with-Rame 10 829 81 Page 2 of 5 INDICATOR 23.4: No. new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Coast

Manaccan 33 321 Marhamchurch Mawgan-in-Meneage 113171 1 Mawgan-in-Pydar Mawnan 105 49 4 52 Menheniot Mevagissey 46 8 27 11 Michaelstow Millbrook Morvah 1111 Morval Morwenstow 12 9 3 12 9 3 Mullion 45 4 37 4 45 4 37 4 Mylor 58 37 10 11 Newquay North Hill North Petherwin North Tamerton Otterham 11 Padstow 22 5 12 5 Paul 41 3 Pelynt Penryn Valley 11 82331 1 Perranarworthal Perranuthnoe 14284 Perranzabuloe Philleigh 3322 Pillaton 725 Portreath 211 211 Poundstock 312 Probus Quethiock Redruth Roche Ruan Lanihorne 945 Sancreed 44514 Sennen 14 3 5 6 30 15 6 9 Sheviock 11 Sithney South Hill South Petherwin St. Agnes 20 3 14 3 44 11 20 13 St. Allen St. Anthony-in-Meneage 33 St. Austell St. Austell Bay 211 St. Blaise St. Breock 9522 St. Breward 11 St. Buryan 954 806677 St. Cleer 44 Page 3 of 5 INDICATOR 23.4: No. new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Coast

St. Clement 11 St. Clether 11 St. Columb Major St. Day St. Dennis St. Dominic 11 St. Endellion 1654716547 St. Enoder St. Erme St. Erth St. Ervan St. Eval 11 St. Ewe St. Gennys 514 514 St. Germans 6321 St. Gluvias St. Goran 96126312 St. Hilary St. Issey 5212 St. Ive St. Ives 4 224 22 St. John St. Juliot 722311 St. Just 97 30 38 29 97 30 38 29 St. Just-in-Roseland 4444 St. Keverne 46 5 12 29 St. Kew St. Keyne St. Levan 21 114914 St. Mabyn St. Martin-by-Looe St. Martin-in-Meneage 8413 St. Mellion St. Merryn 38 3 3 32 St. Mewan St. Michael Caerhays St. Michael Penkevil St. Michael's Mount St. Minver Highlands St. Minver Lowlands St. Neot 7313 St. East St. Pinnock St. Sampson 5311 St. Stephen-in-Brannel St. Stephens By Launceston R St. Teath 2 112 11 St. Thomas The Apostle Rural St. Tudy St. Veep 11 St. Wenn St. Winnow Stithians Stoke Climsland 11 Tintagel 39 8 6 25 39 8 6 25 Page 4 of 5 INDICATOR 23.4: No. new dwellings approved in the landscape designations AONB and Heritage Coast

Towednack 211 211 Tregony Tremaine Treneglos Tresmeer Trevalga 61 561 5 Treverbyn Trewen Truro Tywardreath And Par Veryan 321 211 Wadebridge Warbstow Warleggan 32 1 Week St. Mary Wendron Werrington Whitstone Withiel Zennor 6 336 33 TOTALS 999 308 326 365 559 158 244 157

Page 5 of 5 24.1: Number of listed buildings on the ‘At Risk’ Register

HEADLINE FIGURES TOTAL NO OF 'AT RISK' REGISTRATIONS TO DATE 242 NO. OF 'AT RISK' LISTED BUILDINGS TO DATE 53 Total No. of Scheduled Monuments 186 Total No. of Conservation Areas 1

AT RISK' LISTED BUILDING CATEGORIES Listed Building grade I 1 Listed Building grade II* 25 Listed Place of Worship grade I 16 Listed Place of Worship grade II 4 Listed Place of Worship grade II* 7

CONDITION OF 'AT RISK' REGISTRATIONS Extensive significant problems 21 Very bad 17 Poor 43 Generally unsatisfactory with major localised problems 91 Generally satisfactory but with significant localised problems 60 Generally satisfactory but with minor localised problems 8 Fair 1 Unknown 1

NOTE: Buildings (inc. places of worship) are rated very bad, poor, fair or good. Other categories apply only to sites that cover areas, rather than one specific building or monument. AT RISK CONDITION BREAKDOWN

Extensive significant problems

60, 25% Very bad

8, 3% Poor 1, 0% 91, 38% Generally unsatisfactory with major localised problems 21, 9% 1, 0% Generally satisfactory but with significant localised problems Generally satisfactory but with minor localised problems

43, 18% 17, 7% Fair Unknown 24.1: Number of listed buildings on the ‘At Risk’ Register

TOTAL NUMBER OF 'AT RISK' REGISTRATIONS BY YEAR: Total No. of At Risk Registrations in 2014 242 Total No. of At Risk Registrations in 2015 249 Total No. of At Risk Registrations in 2016 242

TOTAL NUMBER OF 'AT RISK' LISTED BUILDINGS BY YEAR: Total No. of At Risk Registrations in 2014 54 Total No. of At Risk Registrations in 2015 54 Total No. of At Risk Registrations in 2016 53

AT RISK' LISTED BUILDING CATEGORIES OVER TIME LISTED CATEGORIES 2014 2015 2016 Listed Building grade I 111 Listed Building grade II* 25 24 23 Listed Place of Worship grade I 16 17 16 Listed Place of Worship grade II 478 Listed Place of Worship grade II* 756

RECENT SITE HISTORY (2014-2016): The following buildings came off the 'At-Risk' Register in 2015: Listed Buildings Grade II*: Barn SE of Tremaer, Bude-Stratton (1229361), New Pattern Shop, Perran Foundry, Perran Wharf, Mylor (1328668), Listed Place of Worship Grade I: Church of St Wenappa, Gwennap (1328991), Listed Place of Worship Grade II: Church of St George, Truro (1201533), Listed Place of Worship Grade II*: Church of St Briocus, Lezant (1291277) The following buildings were added to the 'At Risk' register in 2015: Listed Building Grade II*: Rosecadgehill House, Penzance (1143171), Marlborough House, Falmouth (1270002), Engine Sheds, Stack and Turntable, St. Blaise (1289905), Listed Place of Worship Grade I: Church of St Petroc, Padstow (1289931), Church of St Stephen, Launceston (1297830) The following buildings came off the 'At-Risk' Register in 2016: Listed Building Grade II*: Count House, Camborne (1142685) Listed Place of Worship Grade I: Church of St Brueredus, Churchtown St Breward (1158842), Church of St Enoder (1311865), Church of St Anietus, St. Neot (1329212) Listed Place of Worship Grade II: Camelford Methodist Church (1138307), Chapel of St Piran, Tintagel (1143411), Church of St Ida, St. Issey (1212700), Wesleyan Reform Union Chapel, St. Just (1386531) The following sites were added to the 'At Risk' register in 2016: Listed Building Grade II*: Cusgarne Manor farmhouse, Gwennap (1140913), Former Carharrack Methodist Church, Carharrack (1160248) Listed Place of Worship Grade I: Church of Saint Maugan, Mawgan-in-Meneage (1328596), Church of St Clement (1328900), Listed Place of Worship Grade II: Gunwen Methodist Church, Luxulyan (1158020), Listed Place of Worship Grade II*: Church of St Bartholomew, Warleggan (1140464), Church of St Martin, Lewannick (1277508) 24.1: Number of listed buildings on the ‘At Risk’ Register

SITE TYPE AND TREND BREAKDOWN Data downloaded at 15/08/2017

SITE TYPE DecliningDeteriorating Improving Stable Unknown (blank) Grand Total Agriculture and subsistence 2 2 Barrier 3 126 Battlefield 1 1 Defence 20 4 4 4 32 Domestic 396718 61 Education 11 Enclosure 4 4 Gardens parks and urban space 11 Industrial 111317 23 Maritime 11 Religious ritual and funerary 43 3 15 4 36 101 Stable 11 Transport 21 2 5 Uncategorised 11 Wide mix of uses 1 12

OVERALL TREND (ALL SITE TYPES) PRIORITY CATEGORY

Declining 125 51.7% A - Immediate risk of further rapid deterioration or loss of fabric; no solution agreed 15 Deteriorating 1 0.4% A - No action/strategy identified or agreed (where trend is declining or unknown) 1 Improving 15 6.2% B - Immediate risk of further rapid deterioration or loss of fabric; solution agreed but 9 Stable 32 13.2% not yet implemented Unknown 9 3.7% C - Slow decay; no solution agreed 26 (blank) 60 24.8% D - Slow decay; solution agreed but not yet implemented 5 Grand Total 242 F - Repair scheme in progress and (where applicable) end use or user identified; or 5 functionally redundant buildings with new use agreed but not yet implemented.

SOURCE: https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/heritage-at-risk/ Historic England figures are generated by national bodies according to national criteria. They relate to higher levels of designated asset do and not the full extent of at risk sites in Cornwall. More detailed local lists may become available in future analyses. 24.1: Number of listed buildings on the ‘At Risk’ Register

TREND BREAKDOWN - ALL SITE TYPES

51.7% 0.4% 6.2% 13.2% 3.7% 24.8%

Declining Deteriorating Improving Stable Unknown (blank)

Trend Breakdowns by Site Type

Agriculture and subsistence Industrial

200000 11 0 1 3 1 7

Barrier Maritime

30010 2 000010 Battlefield Religious ritual and funerary

100000 43 03 15 4 36 Defence Stable

20 0 4 4 0 4 000001 Domestic Transport

39 0 6 7 1 8 201002 Education Uncategorised

000100 000010 Enclosure Wide mix of uses

400000 010100 Gardens parks and urban spaces Key 000010Declining Deteriorating51.7% Improving0.4%6.2%Stable 13.2% 3.7%Unknown 24.8% (blank)