General Election; November 6, 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Election; November 6, 2012 Reconciliation Report Yakima County General Election; November 6, 2012 Active registered voters 106,452 Overall ballot Total ballots received 78,840 Inactive registered voters 8,016 reconciliation Total ballots counted 78,420 Total registered voters 114,468 Total ballots rejected 420 Credited voters 78,420 Not reconciled 0 Voter Category Reconciliation Detail Returned (include Rejected (include provisionals from other provisionals sent to other Ballot category Ballot Categories Issued counties) Accepted / counted counties) discrepancy Ballot category totals 106,954 78,840 78,420 420 0 UOCAVA 721 462 461 1 0 Federal write-In n/a 13 13 0 0 Provisional 365 413 318 95 0 Ballots cast on AVU's 25 25 25 0 0 All other ballots not reported above (include Regular & ACP) 105,843 77,927 77,603 324 0 Are both the Overall ballot reconciliation and total Ballot category discrepancy cells showing zero? Yes No If not, attach an explanation of the discrepancies and/or the process followed to resolve the discrepancies per WAC 434-262-060, 434-262-070 and 434-262-100. Additional information requested by the Secretary of State Of the ballots accounted for above, how many were returned by email or fax? 197 Of all ballots accounted for above, how many were issued through MyBallot, another online program, or a pdf sent from the county? 396 Of all ballots accepted/counted as reported above, how many were issued through MyBallot, another online program, or a pdf sent from the county? 274 AutoMark counties: Please enter an estimate of voters using the AutoMark in the box to the right. n/a Cumulative Report — Official General Election — Yakima County, Washington — November 06, 2012 Page 1 of 8 11/27/2012 08:31 AM Total Number of Voters : 78,420 of 106,452 = 73.67% Precincts Reporting 0 of 164 = 0.00% Party Candidate Total Ballots Cast NA Total Initiative Measure No. 1185, Vote For 1 Yes 51,701 69.56% 0 0.00% 51,701 69.56% No 22,621 30.44% 0 0.00% 22,621 30.44% Cast Votes: 74,322 94.77% 0 0.00% 74,322 94.77% Over Votes: 11 0.01% 0 0.00% 11 0.01% Under Votes: 4,087 5.21% 0 0.00% 4,087 5.21% Initiative Measure No. 1240, Vote For 1 Yes 38,708 51.53% 0 0.00% 38,708 51.53% No 36,413 48.47% 0 0.00% 36,413 48.47% Cast Votes: 75,121 95.79% 0 0.00% 75,121 95.79% Over Votes: 4 0.01% 0 0.00% 4 0.01% Under Votes: 3,295 4.20% 0 0.00% 3,295 4.20% Referendum Measure No. 74, Vote For 1 Approved 27,819 36.36% 0 0.00% 27,819 36.36% Rejected 48,695 63.64% 0 0.00% 48,695 63.64% Cast Votes: 76,514 97.57% 0 0.00% 76,514 97.57% Over Votes: 8 0.01% 0 0.00% 8 0.01% Under Votes: 1,898 2.42% 0 0.00% 1,898 2.42% Initiative Measure No. 502, Vote For 1 Yes 32,330 42.19% 0 0.00% 32,330 42.19% No 44,297 57.81% 0 0.00% 44,297 57.81% Cast Votes: 76,627 97.71% 0 0.00% 76,627 97.71% Over Votes: 10 0.01% 0 0.00% 10 0.01% Under Votes: 1,783 2.27% 0 0.00% 1,783 2.27% Engrossed Senate Joint Resolution No. 8221, Vote For 1 Approved 45,416 64.50% 0 0.00% 45,416 64.50% Rejected 24,996 35.50% 0 0.00% 24,996 35.50% Cast Votes: 70,412 89.79% 0 0.00% 70,412 89.79% Over Votes: 10 0.01% 0 0.00% 10 0.01% Under Votes: 7,998 10.20% 0 0.00% 7,998 10.20% Cumulative Report — Official General Election — Yakima County, Washington — November 06, 2012 Page 2 of 8 11/27/2012 08:31 AM Total Number of Voters : 78,420 of 106,452 = 73.67% Precincts Reporting 0 of 164 = 0.00% Party Candidate Total Ballots Cast NA Total Senate Joint Resolution No. 8223, Vote For 1 Approved 28,772 40.36% 0 0.00% 28,772 40.36% Rejected 42,511 59.64% 0 0.00% 42,511 59.64% Cast Votes: 71,283 90.90% 0 0.00% 71,283 90.90% Over Votes: 8 0.01% 0 0.00% 8 0.01% Under Votes: 7,129 9.09% 0 0.00% 7,129 9.09% Advisory Vote No. 1 Engrossed Senate Bill 6635, Vote For 1 Repealed 46,684 67.59% 0 0.00% 46,684 67.59% Maintained 22,390 32.41% 0 0.00% 22,390 32.41% Cast Votes: 69,074 88.08% 0 0.00% 69,074 88.08% Over Votes: 19 0.02% 0 0.00% 19 0.02% Under Votes: 9,327 11.89% 0 0.00% 9,327 11.89% Advisory Vote No. 2 Substitute House Bill 2590, Vote For 1 Repealed 43,992 64.18% 0 0.00% 43,992 64.18% Maintained 24,553 35.82% 0 0.00% 24,553 35.82% Cast Votes: 68,545 87.41% 0 0.00% 68,545 87.41% Over Votes: 11 0.01% 0 0.00% 11 0.01% Under Votes: 9,864 12.58% 0 0.00% 9,864 12.58% President / Vice-President of the United States, Vote For 1 Barack Obama / Joe Biden 33,217 42.86% 0 0.00% 33,217 42.86% Mitt Romney / Paul Ryan 42,239 54.50% 0 0.00% 42,239 54.50% Gary Johnson / James P. Gray 749 0.97% 0 0.00% 749 0.97% Virgil Goode / James N. Clymer 285 0.37% 0 0.00% 285 0.37% Jill Stein / Cheri Honkala 330 0.43% 0 0.00% 330 0.43% Peta Lindsay / Yari Osorio 28 0.04% 0 0.00% 28 0.04% James Harris / Alyson Kennedy 30 0.04% 0 0.00% 30 0.04% Ross C. (Rocky) Anderson / Luis J. Rodriguez 95 0.12% 0 0.00% 95 0.12% Write-In 533 0.69% 0 0.00% 533 0.69% Cast Votes: 77,506 98.83% 0 0.00% 77,506 98.83% Over Votes: 313 0.40% 0 0.00% 313 0.40% Under Votes: 601 0.77% 0 0.00% 601 0.77% Cumulative Report — Official General Election — Yakima County, Washington — November 06, 2012 Page 3 of 8 11/27/2012 08:31 AM Total Number of Voters : 78,420 of 106,452 = 73.67% Precincts Reporting 0 of 164 = 0.00% Party Candidate Total Ballots Cast NA Total U.S. Senator, Vote For 1 Maria Cantwell 38,184 49.96% 0 0.00% 38,184 49.96% Michael Baumgartner 38,115 49.87% 0 0.00% 38,115 49.87% Write-In 130 0.17% 0 0.00% 130 0.17% Cast Votes: 76,429 97.46% 0 0.00% 76,429 97.46% Over Votes: 9 0.01% 0 0.00% 9 0.01% Under Votes: 1,982 2.53% 0 0.00% 1,982 2.53% U.S. Representative; Congressional District 4, Vote For 1 Doc Hastings 44,170 58.38% 0 0.00% 44,170 58.38% Mary Baechler 31,264 41.32% 0 0.00% 31,264 41.32% Write-In 221 0.29% 0 0.00% 221 0.29% Cast Votes: 75,655 96.47% 0 0.00% 75,655 96.47% Over Votes: 11 0.01% 0 0.00% 11 0.01% Under Votes: 2,754 3.51% 0 0.00% 2,754 3.51% Governor, Vote For 1 Jay Inslee 31,791 41.47% 0 0.00% 31,791 41.47% Rob McKenna 44,507 58.06% 0 0.00% 44,507 58.06% Write-In 354 0.46% 0 0.00% 354 0.46% Cast Votes: 76,652 97.75% 0 0.00% 76,652 97.75% Over Votes: 11 0.01% 0 0.00% 11 0.01% Under Votes: 1,757 2.24% 0 0.00% 1,757 2.24% Lieutenant Governor, Vote For 1 Brad Owen 35,835 48.47% 0 0.00% 35,835 48.47% Bill Finkbeiner 37,914 51.28% 0 0.00% 37,914 51.28% Write-In 187 0.25% 0 0.00% 187 0.25% Cast Votes: 73,936 94.28% 0 0.00% 73,936 94.28% Over Votes: 8 0.01% 0 0.00% 8 0.01% Under Votes: 4,476 5.71% 0 0.00% 4,476 5.71% Cumulative Report — Official General Election — Yakima County, Washington — November 06, 2012 Page 4 of 8 11/27/2012 08:31 AM Total Number of Voters : 78,420 of 106,452 = 73.67% Precincts Reporting 0 of 164 = 0.00% Party Candidate Total Ballots Cast NA Total Secretary of State, Vote For 1 Kim Wyman 44,198 60.24% 0 0.00% 44,198 60.24% Kathleen Drew 29,013 39.54% 0 0.00% 29,013 39.54% Write-In 163 0.22% 0 0.00% 163 0.22% Cast Votes: 73,374 93.57% 0 0.00% 73,374 93.57% Over Votes: 8 0.01% 0 0.00% 8 0.01% Under Votes: 5,038 6.42% 0 0.00% 5,038 6.42% State Treasurer, Vote For 1 Jim Mclntire 35,225 48.24% 0 0.00% 35,225 48.24% Sharon Hanek 37,656 51.57% 0 0.00% 37,656 51.57% Write-In 135 0.18% 0 0.00% 135 0.18% Cast Votes: 73,016 93.11% 0 0.00% 73,016 93.11% Over Votes: 12 0.02% 0 0.00% 12 0.02% Under Votes: 5,392 6.88% 0 0.00% 5,392 6.88% State Auditor, Vote For 1 James Watkins 42,121 58.15% 0 0.00% 42,121 58.15% Troy Kelley 30,148 41.62% 0 0.00% 30,148 41.62% Write-In 163 0.23% 0 0.00% 163 0.23% Cast Votes: 72,432 92.36% 0 0.00% 72,432 92.36% Over Votes: 9 0.01% 0 0.00% 9 0.01% Under Votes: 5,979 7.62% 0 0.00% 5,979 7.62% Attorney General, Vote For 1 Bob Ferguson 28,307 38.38% 0 0.00% 28,307 38.38% Reagan Dunn 45,294 61.41% 0 0.00% 45,294 61.41% Write-In 158 0.21% 0 0.00% 158 0.21% Cast Votes: 73,759 94.06% 0 0.00% 73,759 94.06% Over Votes: 8 0.01% 0 0.00% 8 0.01% Under Votes: 4,653 5.93% 0 0.00% 4,653 5.93% Cumulative Report — Official General Election — Yakima County, Washington — November 06, 2012 Page 5 of 8 11/27/2012 08:31 AM Total Number of Voters : 78,420 of 106,452 = 73.67% Precincts Reporting 0 of 164 = 0.00% Party Candidate Total Ballots Cast NA Total Commissioner of Public Lands, Vote For 1 Peter J.
Recommended publications
  • Pdf Document
    1 / 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS UNITED STATES STATE SUPREME REPRESENTATIVE STATE MEMBER OF FOR PRESIDENT SENATOR COURT JUSTICE IN CONGRESS SENATOR ASSEMBLY OFFICE AND VICE PRESIDENT (6 Year Term) 6th J.D. (14 Year Term) 23rd District 58th District 125th District (Vote Once) (Vote for any ONE) (Vote for any ONE) (Vote for any ONE) (Vote for any ONE) (Vote for any ONE) DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATIC 1A 2A 4A 6A Barack Obama for President Kirsten E. Nate Barbara S. A Joe Biden for Vice President Gillibrand Shinagawa Lifton REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN 1B 2B 3B 4B 5B Mitt Romney for President Wendy Kevin M. Thomas W. Thomas F. B Paul Ryan for Vice President Long Dowd Reed, II O'Mara CONSERVATIVE CONSERVATIVE CONSERVATIVE CONSERVATIVE CONSERVATIVE 1C 2C 4C 5C Mitt Romney for President Wendy Thomas W. Thomas F. C Paul Ryan for Vice President Long Reed, II O'Mara WORKING FAMILIES WORKING FAMILIES WORKING FAMILIES WORKING FAMILIES WORKING FAMILIES 1D 2D 4D 6D Barack Obama for President Kirsten E. Nate Barbara S. D Joe Biden for Vice President Gillibrand Shinagawa Lifton INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE 2E 4E 5E Kirsten E. Thomas W. Thomas F. E Gillibrand Reed, II O'Mara GREEN GREEN 1F 2F GREEN 5036 Jill Stein for President Colia F Cheri Honkala for Vice President Clark SOCIALISM AND LIB SOCIALISM AND LIB 1G Peta Lindsay for President G Yari Osorio for Vice President LIBERTARIAN LIBERTARIAN LIBERTARIAN 1H 2H Gary Johnson for President Chris H James P. Gray for Vice President Edes SAMPLECONSTITUTION .
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2007 No. 22 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was become true. It is Orwellian double- committee of initial referral has a called to order by the Speaker pro tem- think, an amazing concept. statement that the proposition con- pore (Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia). They believe that if you simply just tains no congressional earmarks. So f say you are lowering drug prices, poof, the chairman of the Appropriations it’s done, ignoring the reality that Committee, Mr. OBEY, conveniently DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO prices really won’t be lowered and submitted to the record on January 29 TEMPORE fewer drugs will be made available to that prior to the omnibus bill being The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- our seniors. considered, quote, ‘‘does not contain fore the House the following commu- They believe that if you just say you any congressional earmarks, limited nication from the Speaker: are implementing all of the 9/11 Com- tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits.’’ WASHINGTON, DC, mission’s recommendations, it changes But, in fact, Mr. Speaker, this omnibus February 6, 2007. the fact that the bill that was passed spending bill that the Democrats I hereby appoint the Honorable HENRY C. here on the floor doesn’t reflect the to- passed last week contained hundreds of ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, Jr. to act as Speaker pro tality of those recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism and the Environmental Movement: Contemporary Considerations for the Counter Hegemonic Struggle Austen K
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CU Scholar Institutional Repository University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 2016 Neoliberalism and the Environmental Movement: Contemporary Considerations for the Counter Hegemonic Struggle Austen K. Bernier University of Colorado, Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Political Economy Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Bernier, Austen K., "Neoliberalism and the Environmental Movement: Contemporary Considerations for the Counter Hegemonic Struggle" (2016). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1013. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Honors Program at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Neoliberalism and the Environmental Movement: Contemporary Considerations for the Counter- Hegemonic Struggle By Austen K. Bernier University of Colorado at Boulder A Thesis Submitted to the University of Colorado at Boulder in partial fulfillment of the requirements to receive Honors designation in Environmental Studies May 2016 Thesis Advisors: Liam Downey, Department of Sociology, Committee Chair David Ciplet, Department of Environmental Studies Dale Miller, Department of Environmental Studies © 2016 by Austen Bernier All rights reserved ii Abstract This thesis proposes a conceptual framework for understanding how neoliberalism has decreased the ability of environmental movements to manifest changes in political economic structure or spur state action on environmental issues that might be antagonistic to the neoliberal order. Karl Marx and Karl Polanyi have developed reputable theories that describe social movements as exercising a degree of control over political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Books, Documents, Speeches & Films to Read Or
    Books, Documents, Speeches & Films to Read or See Roger Ream, Fund for American Studies Email: [email protected], Website: www.tfas.org Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FB0EhPM_M4 American documents & speeches: Declaration of Independence The Constitution Federalist Papers The Anti-Federalist Washington’s Farewell Address Jefferson 2nd Inaugural Address Gettysburg Address Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death speech of Patrick Henry Ronald Reagan’s Time for Choosing speech (1964) Barry Goldwater’s Acceptance Speech to the 1964 Republican Convention First Principles The Law, Frederic Bastiat A Conflict of Visions, Thomas Sowell Libertarianism: A Reader, David Boaz Libertarianism: A Primer, David Boaz Liberty & Tyranny, Mark Levin Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick The Constitution of Liberty, F.A. Hayek Conscience of a Conservative, Barry Goldwater What It Means to Be a Libertarian, Charles Murray Capitalism and Freedom, Milton Friedman Free Market Economics Economics in One Lesson, Henry Hazlitt Eat the Rich, P.J. O’Rourke Common Sense Economics: What Everyone Should Know about Wealth & Prosperity: James Gwartney, Richard Stroup and Dwight Lee Free to Choose, Milton Friedman Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy, Joseph Schumpeter Basic Economics: A Citizen’s Guide to the Economy, Thomas Sowell Human Action, Ludwig von Mises Principles of Economics, Carl Menger Myths of Rich and Poor, W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm The Economic Way of Thinking, 10th edition, Paul Heyne, Peter J. Boettke, David L. Prychitko Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media…, John Stossel Other books of importance: The Road to Serfdom, F.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Canvass Ofresults General Election November 6, 2012
    STATE OF ALABAMA Amended Canvass ofResults General Election November 6, 2012 Pursua:lt to Chapter 14 of Title 17 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, we, the undersigned, hereby am\~nd the canvass of results certified on November 28, 2012, for the General Election for the offices of President of the United States and Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court held in Alabama on Tuesday, November 6, 2012, and to incorporate the write-in votes reported by Wilcox County in said election. The amended canvass shows the correct tabulation of votes to be as recorded on the following pages. In Testimony Whereby, I have hereunto set my hand and affIxed the Great and Principal Seal of the State of Alal:>ama at the State Capitol, in the City nf Montgomery, on this the 17th day of December, in the year 2012­ Governor Attorney General ~an~ Secretary of State FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA / Min ROMNEY / VIRGIL H. GOODE, JR. / GARY JOHNSON / JILL STEIN / JOE BIDEN (D) PAUL RYAN (R) JAMES CLYMER (I) JIM GRAY (I) CHERI HONKALA (I) WI Total Vote County Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Total Votes Autauga 6,363 17,379 31 137 22 41 23,973 Baldwin 18,424 66,016 122 607 169 153 85,491 Barbour 5,912 5,550 9 32 6 8 11,517 Bibb 2,202 6,132 13 38 9 26 8,420 Blount 2,970 20,757 59 170 50 54 24,060 Bullock 4,061 1,251 4 3 3 5,322 Butler 4,374 5,087 9 20 6 6 9,502 Calhoun 15,511 30,278 85 291 92 107 46,364 Chambers 6,871 7,626 21 78 15 18 14,629 Cherokee 2,132 7,506 36 79 26 13 9,792 Chilton 3,397
    [Show full text]
  • House Section
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2005 No. 83 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was I would like to read an e-mail that there has never been a worse time for called to order by the Speaker pro tem- one of my staffers received at the end Congress to be part of a campaign pore (Miss MCMORRIS). of last week from a friend of hers cur- against public broadcasting. We formed f rently serving in Iraq. The soldier says: the Public Broadcasting Caucus 5 years ‘‘I know there are growing doubts, ago here on Capitol Hill to help pro- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO questions and concerns by many re- mote the exchange of ideas sur- TEMPORE garding our presence here and how long rounding public broadcasting, to help The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- we should stay. For what it is worth, equip staff and Members of Congress to fore the House the following commu- the attachment hopefully tells you deal with the issues that surround that nication from the Speaker: why we are trying to make a positive important service. difference in this country’s future.’’ There are complexities in areas of le- WASHINGTON, DC, This is the attachment, Madam June 21, 2005. gitimate disagreement and technical I hereby appoint the Honorable CATHY Speaker, and a picture truly is worth matters, make no mistake about it, MCMORRIS to act as Speaker pro tempore on 1,000 words.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    san mateo county the newsletter for the Libertarian Party of San Mateo County independence day 2013 image: Robert Santorelli jefferson weeping by Judge Andrew Napolitano Do you have more personal liberty today than on the Fourth of July 2012? When Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, he used language that has become iconic. He wrote that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, and among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Not only did he write those words, but the first Congress adopted them unanimously, and they are still the law of the land today. By acknowledging that our rights are inalienable, Jefferson’s words and the first federal statute recognize that our rights come from our humanity – from within us – and not from the government. The government the Framers gave us was not one that had the power and ability to decide how much freedom each of us should have, but rather one in which we individually and then collectively decided how much power the government should have. That, of course, is also recognized in the Declaration, wherein Jefferson wrote that the government derives its powers from the consent of the governed. To what governmental powers may the governed morally consent contents in a free society? We can consent to the powers necessary to protect us from force and fraud, and to the means of revenue to pay for a government to exercise those powers. But no one can jefferson weeping ........... 111 consent to the diminution of anyone else’s natural rights, because, contact us ………....................
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Ed Read Minutes, Mike Skelly Seconded and They Were Approved
    March 17, 2012 GPNJ Convention 9:45 Convention called to order by Mike Spector. Mike addressed the convention. He encouraged us to obtain signatures for Ken Wolski’s senate run. Only 50 signatures are needed for House Races this year. Ballot Issue Nick pointed out we need Freeholder candidates to get a ballot line on left side of ballot instead of on far right. Jill Stein Speech Introduction Jill Stein was introduced by her campaign manager and spoke on struggles in Wisconsin to overcome Governor Walker’s policies and the Chamber of Commerce Jill is homegrown and recruited into GP. Jill is speaking all over the country to get signatures. For ballot access and increase awareness of GP. Jill is seeking denotations for her campaign to obtain federal matching funds. She needs $5,000 in 20 states raised by contributions of $250 or less. If 20 people give $250, then NJ has qualified. Almost half in NJ have done so already. She is reaching ballot access in 48 states. Jill’s Speech There is hope for 3rd party. Democratic movements. Obama is supporting the wrong policies, just as the Republicans are. Jill emphasized the importance of giving people a choice and not having to vote for corporate rule. Jill’s would have communities make decisions on how to implement a Green New Deal. She spoke of the NDAA act which did away of right to trial and HR 347 that can criminalize protest by having ground demonstrations declared national security land protestors made felons. She called for a Voter bill of rights, IRV (rank choice), and proportional representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign
    45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of #Metoo
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: the First 50, a Historic Symposium
    Edited by: Steve Chase and Mark Madison 2 Acknowledgments and Sponsors Arctic 50th Historical Special thanks to: Clayton McBride Symposium Planning Team Todd Harless Geoff Haskett, LaVerne Smith, Keith Mantheiy Jay Slack, Director, National and Todd Logan, U.S Fish and Thelma Flynn Conservation Training Center, Wildlife Service, Region 7, Mike Beth Ann Ring U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Boylan, Richard Voss, Larry Bell Laura Creamer Becky Edgar Steve Chase, Chief, Division of Marca Piehuta Education Outreach, National Georgia Jeppesen Conservation Training Center, Sponsors Dawn Lagrotteria U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alicha Burlett Kerrick Reisbig Dr. Mark Madison, Service Historian, National Conservation Gail Testa National Conservation Training Training Center Andrew Weinberg Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service George Krull Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Ben German Jimmy Fox, Region 7, U.S. Tara Lowe Fish and Wildlife Service The Conservation Fund Cynthia Fraula-Hahn David Klinger Maureen Clark, Arctic 50th Voices of the South Shepherd University Department of Coordinator, Region 7, U.S. Contemporary Art and Theater Fish and Wildlife Service Patrick Wallace American Conservation Film Festival Sarah Gannon-Nagle, Strategic And for their efforts and support NCTC ARAMARK Staff Communications Manager, National of this symposium, thanks to: NCTC Raven Services Staff Conservation Training Center, NCTC Security Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service All of our speakers Jay Slack Thelma Flynn, Event Planner, Jim Willis National Conservation Training Kelly Kennedy Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Rollie Jacobs Beth Stevens Dr. Jim Siegel, National Christine Eustis Conservation Training Center, Karin Christensen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarians in Bush's World
    ESSAY ON LIBERTY+ LIBERTARIANS IN BUSH’S WORLD Todd Seavey* Imagine ordinary, non-ideological people hearing about an obscure politi- cal sect called libertarianism, which emphasizes self-ownership, property rights, resistance to tyranny and violence, the reduction of taxation and regulation, control over one’s own investments, and the de-emphasizing of litigation as a primary means of dispute resolution. Since this philosophy has very few adherents in the general population and is very much a minority position among intellectuals, one might expect proponents of the creed to count themselves lucky, given the likely alternatives, if the president of the country in which most of them live increasingly emphasized the themes of freedom and ownership in his major speeches; toppled brutal totalitarian regimes in two countries while hounding democracy-hating theocratic terrorists around the globe; cut taxes (despite howls even from some in the free-market camp that the cuts were too deep); called for simplification of the tax code; appointed relatively industry-friendly officials to major regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration despite frequent criti- cism by the media; proposed partially privatizing Social Security (America’s largest socialist boondoggle but one long regarded as sacrosanct by political analysts); and pushed tort reform to combat the chilling effect of lawsuits on doctors and manu- facturers. + Essays on Liberty is a continuing series of the Journal of Law & Liberty, dedicated to explorations of freedom and law from perspectives outside the legal academy. * Director of Publications for the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH.org, HealthFactsAnd- Fears.com), which does not necessarily endorse the views expressed here.
    [Show full text]