DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Directory of Wildland Fire Management Personnel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 Directory of Wildland Fire Management Personnel 2021 DIRECTORY OF WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL April 1, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Forest Fire Centres ....................................................................................................................................... i Provincial / Territorial Warehouses ............................................................................................................ ii Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) .................................................................................... 1 CIFFC Working Groups / Communities of Practice ................................................................................... 1 Forest Fire Management Agencies British Columbia ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Yukon ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Alberta ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Northwest Territories................................................................................................................................. 5 Saskatchewan .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Manitoba ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Ontario ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Société de protection des forêts contre le feu (SOPFEU) ......................................................................... 9 Québec .................................................................................................................................................. 10 New Brunswick ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Nova Scotia ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Prince Edward Island .............................................................................................................................. 13 Newfoundland and Labrador ................................................................................................................... 14 Parks Canada ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service ........................................................................................................................ 17 Pacific Forestry Centre ........................................................................................................................ 17 Northern Forestry Centre ..................................................................................................................... 17 Great Lakes Forestry Centre ............................................................................................................... 17 Laurentian Forestry Centre .................................................................................................................. 17 United States Federal Agencies .......................................................................................................... 18 National Interagency Fire Centre (NIFC) ................................................................................................ 18 United States Department of Agriculture – Forest Service ...................................................................... 18 Missoula Technology & Development Centre ...................................................................................... 18 San Dimas Technology & Development Centre .................................................................................. 18 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ................................................. 18 National Park Service ............................................................................................................................. 18 Other ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 North American Forest Commission Fire Management Working Group ................................................. 19 The Northeast Forest Fire Protection Compact ...................................................................................... 19 Great Lakes Forest Fire Compact ........................................................................................................... 19 Great Plains Interstate Forest Fire Compact ........................................................................................... 19 Northwest Fire Compact ......................................................................................................................... 19 Canada Wildfire ...................................................................................................................................... 19 FPInnovations ......................................................................................................................................... 19 FOREST FIRE CENTRES Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre Inc. Ontario 1749 Ellice Avenue Aviation, Forest Fire and Emergency Services Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H 1A6 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 70 Foster Drive, Suite 400 CIFFC Duty Officer.................................................................. 204-784-2030 Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 6V5 Fax ............................................................... 204-956-2398 Email ............................................................. [email protected] Ontario Duty Officer ................................................................ 705-945-5751 Fax ............................................................... 705-945-5785 British Columbia Email ....................................... [email protected] Provincial Wildfire Coordination Centre BC Wildfire Service Québec Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resources Operations & Rural Société de protection des forêts contre le feu (SOPFEU) Development Aéroport international Jean-Lesage 3080 Airport Drive 715, 7e rue de l’Aéroport Kamloops, BC V2B 7X2 Québec (Québec) G2G 2S7 Coordination Officer Cell (Apr. 1 - Sept. 30) ........................... 250-318-2324 SOPFEU Officier/Officer ......................................................... 418-871-3341 24hr Line ...................................................... 250.376-6777 Cellulaire/Cell............................................... 418-571-3310 Fax ............................................................... 250-554-5428 Télécopieur/Fax ........................................... 418-874-2629 Email .................................................. [email protected] Courriel/Email [email protected] Yukon Territory New Brunswick Wildland Fire Management Branch Forest Fire Management Branch Protective Services Division Dept. of Natural Resources and Energy Development Dept. of Community Services C-19 Hugh John Fleming Forestry Complex P.O. Box 2703 P.O. Box 6000 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2C6 Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1 Yukon Duty Officer (Apr. 1 - Sept. 30) .................................... 867-667-3128 New Brunswick Duty Officer ................................................... 506-453-3335 or .................................................................. 867-456-3941 Cell ............................................................... 506-461-3915 Fax ............................................................... 867-667-3148 Email .................................... [email protected] Email ........................................................ [email protected] Nova Scotia Alberta Fleet and Forest Protection Alberta Wildfire Coordination Centre (AWCC) Department of Lands and Forestry Agriculture and Forestry 23 Creighton Road Wildfire Management Branch P.O. Box 130 Forestry Building Shubenacadie, NS B0N 2H0 2nd Floor, 9920-108 Street Edmonton, AB T5K 2M4 Nova Scotia Duty Officer ......................................................... 902-758-7230 Fax ............................................................... 902-758-3210 Alberta Duty Officer ................................................................. 780-415-6460 Email .................................. [email protected] or 24hr ......................................................... 780-913-2344 Email .................................................... [email protected] Prince Edward Island Department of Environment, Energy and Climate Action Northwest Territories Forests, Fish & Wildlife Division Forest Management Division P.O. Box 2000 Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources 183 Upton Road Government of NWT Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8 P.O. Box 7 Fort Smith, NT X0E 0P0 PEI Duty Officer ..................................................................... 902-218-9076 or .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SFI 2020 Annual Report
    SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE 2YEARS SFI-00001 1995-20205 BETTER CHOICES FOR THE PLANET 2020 SFI PROGRESS REPORT 18-month calendar July 2020–December 2021 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE 2YEARS SFI-00001 1995-20205 IT IS CRITICAL THAT WE WORK TOGETHER TO ENSURE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF OUR PLANET. People and organizations are seeking solutions that don’t just reduce negative impacts but ensure positive contributions to the long-term health of people and the planet. SFI-certified forests and products are powerful tools to achieve shared goals such as climate action, reduced waste, conservation of biodiversity, education of future generations, and sustainable economic development. SFI PROVIDES PRACTICAL, SCALABLE SOLUTIONS FOR MARKETS AND COMMUNITIES WORKING TO PURSUE THIS GROWING COMMITMENT TO A SUSTAINABLE PLANET. When companies, consumers, educators, community, and sustainability leaders collaborate with SFI, they are making active, positive choices to achieve a sustainable future. Our mission is to advance sustainability through forest-focused collaborations. For 25 years, SFI has been a leader in sustainable forest management through our standards. In recent years, we have built on our successes and evolved into a solutions-oriented sustainability organization that addresses local, national, and global challenges. Our recently updated mission, to advance sustainability through forest-focused collaborations, reflects this focus. Climate change, biodiversity, strength in diversity, clean water, the future of our youth, the importance of a walk in the forest, and the sustainability and resilience of our communities—these are some of the important issues that the SFI community is working to address. Thank you for We also realized that we will need a new generation of leaders to help us tackle the future challenges being a part of facing our planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Documentation Report Chisholm Fire (LWF-063)
    Final Documentation Report Chisholm Fire (LWF-063) Forest Protection Division TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Context ................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Chisholm Community............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Documentation Team.............................................................................................. 3 Section 1.0 1 1.0 OVERVIEW 1.1 CONTEXT Over the past decade, fire seasons in North America have generally increased in both length and severity. In both 2000 and 2001, the fire season in Alberta was officially declared on March 1, one month earlier than all previous years on record. Coinciding with this has been the aging of forests throughout North America beyond their natural historic ranges, and the increase in community and industrial developments in forested areas which are creating a greater number of wildland/rural/industry interface boundaries. The latter has required unique fire management strategies. As the severity of the 2001 fire season developed in late May, Land and Forest Service escalated man-up and aircraft expenditures significantly above normal levels in expection of increased fire load (Figures 1-3). Prior to fire activity in the Protection Zone of Alberta, municipalities in the agricultural areas were experiencing extreme fire behaviour
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: the First 50, a Historic Symposium
    Edited by: Steve Chase and Mark Madison 2 Acknowledgments and Sponsors Arctic 50th Historical Special thanks to: Clayton McBride Symposium Planning Team Todd Harless Geoff Haskett, LaVerne Smith, Keith Mantheiy Jay Slack, Director, National and Todd Logan, U.S Fish and Thelma Flynn Conservation Training Center, Wildlife Service, Region 7, Mike Beth Ann Ring U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Boylan, Richard Voss, Larry Bell Laura Creamer Becky Edgar Steve Chase, Chief, Division of Marca Piehuta Education Outreach, National Georgia Jeppesen Conservation Training Center, Sponsors Dawn Lagrotteria U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alicha Burlett Kerrick Reisbig Dr. Mark Madison, Service Historian, National Conservation Gail Testa National Conservation Training Training Center Andrew Weinberg Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service George Krull Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Ben German Jimmy Fox, Region 7, U.S. Tara Lowe Fish and Wildlife Service The Conservation Fund Cynthia Fraula-Hahn David Klinger Maureen Clark, Arctic 50th Voices of the South Shepherd University Department of Coordinator, Region 7, U.S. Contemporary Art and Theater Fish and Wildlife Service Patrick Wallace American Conservation Film Festival Sarah Gannon-Nagle, Strategic And for their efforts and support NCTC ARAMARK Staff Communications Manager, National of this symposium, thanks to: NCTC Raven Services Staff Conservation Training Center, NCTC Security Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service All of our speakers Jay Slack Thelma Flynn, Event Planner, Jim Willis National Conservation Training Kelly Kennedy Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Rollie Jacobs Beth Stevens Dr. Jim Siegel, National Christine Eustis Conservation Training Center, Karin Christensen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanover Annual Report FY 2008
    Swearing in ceremony of Hanover Police Chief Walter L. Sweeney, Jr. seen here with Chief Paul Hayes and members of the Hanover Police Department June 24, 2008 Cover & Inside Cover Photograph Courtesy of: Jean Migre Printed By The Country Press, Inc. Lakeville, MA www.countrypressinc.com ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT ofthe OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES ofthe TOWN OF HANOVER www.hanover-ma.gov FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2008 9n ~ w. <Llam6, :J,t. 1924-2007 9ohn Curtis .f.i6rar_J 7rustee SfwtlaJ, a. ( (joodfJJ,tuu-) 9Jtanduvul 1924-2008 Counc;fon ~!JiYJJ Volunteer flaWciall.(&uJMin,):llicftetJ 1956-2008 Cedar 'Elementary Schoof Volunteer 1/anover 1fi_Jh Schoof Volunteer at8a ( Sauini) JHanna, 1914-2007 2 fj,Jtattei6 j. !biSa&dina 1925-2007 r.mer_Jenc_J Communicafions Center Committee Police Station 1!,uili.in,J Committee 11.ssisfant to the <Town 11.ssessor 911 Coorlinator 1-fanover 9)6IUdd e. !Jtmp6, Jlt. 1956-2008 :Kauutlt w . .'JauuJldon, 1923-2007 1-fanover ~ire 1Je11arfmenf Siu Sm,twt :KefielJ, 1916 -·2001 1<.§_Jislrar 's Off;ce ~ _.M,. W/ittkt 1924-2007 1'arh ~ t/<.§creafion Committee PfanninJ '8oarl Schoof Committee 1eac6er ~ eaacl, 3 TOWN OF HANOVER PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS As of January 1, 2008 REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS Tenth Congressional District WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Quincy COUNCILLOR Fourth Councillor District CHRISTOPHER A. IANNELLA, Jr., Boston STATE SENATOR ROBERTS. CREEDON, Jr., Brockton STATE REPRESENTATIVE Fifth Plymouth Representative District ROBERT J. NYMAN, Hanover COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TIMOTHY J. McMULLEN, Pembroke JOHN P. RIORDAN, Jr. Marshfield JEFFREY M. WELCH, Abington Population Federal Census 13,164 (as of2000) Town Census 14,091 (as of January 2008) 4 ELECTED TOWN OFFICERS As of January 1, 2008 SELECTMEN David G.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    18344 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 21, 1978 provisions of this section shall not apply to a respect to reh.abilitation activities financed lieu thereof "; and", and after Une 13 insert substantially rehab111tated project assisted by a mortgage insured under this Act and the following: · under such section 8 if such rehab111tation carried out, directly or by contract, by any ( 5) by adding the following new sentence is carried out, directly or by contract, by a neighborhood-based nonprofit organization.". at the end of the first paragraph thereof: "Of neighborhood-based nonprofit organization". the additional authority to enter into con­ (c) Section 212(a) of the National Hous­ tracts for annual contributions provided on ing Act is amended by adding the following H.R. 12433 October 1, 1978, and approved in appropria­ new sentence· at the end thereof: "Notwith­ By Mr. GEPHARDT: tions Acts, the Secretary shall make available standing any other provision of law, the pro­ -Page 20, in line 10 strike out "and", and in not less than $50,000,000 for modernization visions of this section shall not apply with line 13 strike out the period and insert in of low-income housing projects.". EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS GEORGE . W. BREWSTER RETIRES includes almost 10 years of experience found time for community affairs. He is FROM PUBLIC LIFE as systems analyst, senior economics ad­ a past president of the Torrance Junior viser, and special assistant to the direc­ Chamber of Commerce; a former chair­ tor of transportation developments for man of the Torrance YMCA Board of HON. GLENN M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Success
    AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Chasing Success Air Force Efforts to Reduce Civilian Harm Sarah B. Sewall Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Sewall, Sarah B. Copy Editor Carolyn Burns Chasing success : Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm / Sarah B. Sewall. Cover Art, Book Design and Illustrations pages cm L. Susan Fair ISBN 978-1-58566-256-2 Composition and Prepress Production 1. Air power—United States—Government policy. Nedra O. Looney 2. United States. Air Force—Rules and practice. 3. Civilian war casualties—Prevention. 4. Civilian Print Preparation and Distribution Diane Clark war casualties—Government policy—United States. 5. Combatants and noncombatants (International law)—History. 6. War victims—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Harm reduction—Government policy— United States. 8. United States—Military policy— Moral and ethical aspects. I. Title. II. Title: Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm. UG633.S38 2015 358.4’03—dc23 2015026952 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Published by Air University Press in March 2016 Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated or the views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any AFRI other US government agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Is Only Leading Dem to Top Trump in Ohio, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Former V.P
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 BIDEN IS ONLY LEADING DEM TO TOP TRUMP IN OHIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; FORMER V.P. HAS BIG LEAD IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Former Vice President Joseph Biden leads President Donald Trump 50 – 42 percent in the critical swing state of Ohio, the only leading Democratic candidate to top the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The other leading Democratic contenders each are locked in a dead heat with President Trump, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll finds: 46 percent for Trump to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with 45 percent; Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and California Sen. Kamala Harris; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; 44 percent for Trump to 43 percent for New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Women, black voters and independent voters give Biden his lead in the matchup with Trump. Biden leads 53 – 40 percent among women, as men are split with 46 percent for Biden and 45 percent for Trump. White voters are divided, with 48 percent for Trump and 45 percent for Biden. Black voters go Democratic 84 – 8 percent. Independent voters go to Biden 55 – 32 percent. Republicans back Trump 86 – 10 percent as Biden leads 96 – 2 percent among Democrats. “Former Vice President Joseph Biden calls himself a blue-collar guy. With Ohio certainly a blue-collar state, it is no surprise he is the Democrat who runs best against President Donald Trump and is solidly ahead in the Democratic primary in the Buckeye State,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Impacts of Drought on Aspen and White Spruce Forests in Western Canada
    Recent impacts of drought on aspen and white spruce forests in western Canada E.H. (Ted) Hogg and Michael Michaelian Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320-122 Street, Edmonton, Alberta E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 110th CIF-IFC Conference and AGM Grande Prairie, Edmonton, September 19, 2018 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2017 1 Team members, collaborators & acknowledgments CIPHA research team Field & laboratory assistance Jim Hammond Ray Fidler Pam Melnick Ted Hogg (NoFC) Rick Hurdle Michelle Filiatrault Ryan Raypold Mike Michaelian (NoFC) Al Keizer Cathryn Hale Erin Van Overloop Trisha Hook (NoFC) Brad Tomm Bonny Hood Martin Robillard Mike Undershultz (Alberta AF) Jim Weber Tom Hutchinson Dan Rowlinson and others Devon Belanger Crystal Ionson Mark Schweitzer Marc Berube Amy Irvine Dominic Senechal Collaborators Natacha Bissonnette Oksana Izio Jessica Snedden Sarah Breen Angela Johnson Joey Tanney Lindsay Bunn Devin Letourneau Ryan Tew Craig Allen (USGS) Laura Chittick Jen MacCormick Bill van Egteren Alan Barr (Environment Canada) Brian Christensen Chelsea Martin Bryan Vroom Pierre Bernier (LFC) Owen Cook Sarah Martin Cedar Welsh Andy Black (UBC) Andrea Durand Lindsay McCoubrey Caroline Whitehouse Scott Goetz (NAU-ABoVE) Fraser McKee Dave Wieder Ron Hall (NoFC) and many others Bob Kochtubajda (EC) Funding Werner Kurz (PFC) Canada Climate Change Action Fund Vic Lieffers (U of Alberta) Program of Energy Research and Development
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Primary - Feb
    Town of Shirley - Presidential Primary - Feb. 5, 2008 - Election Results Final Results from the Town Clerk's Office As of Feb. 29, 2008 Votes Cast 1,867 Registered Voters 3,748 Voter Turnout: 49.76% DEMOCRATIC PARTY REPUBLICAN PARTY GREEN-RAINBOW PARTY Total Votes Cast: 1120 Total Votes Cast: 746 Total Votes Cast: 1 Presidential Presidential Preference Presidential Preference Preference JOHN R. EDWARDS 25 JOHN McCAIN 312 JARED BALL HILLARY CLINTON 658 FRED THOMPSON 4 RALPH NADER JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. 1 TOM TANCREDO 0 ELAINE BROWN CHRISTOPHER J. DODD 1 DUNCAN HUNTER 1 KAT SWIFT MIKE GRAVEL - MIKE HUCKABEE 40 CYNTHIA McKINNEY 1 BARACK OBAMA 422 MITT ROMNEY 350 KENT MESPLAY DENNIS J. KUCINICH 2 RON PAUL 32 NO PREFERENCE BILL RICHARDSON 3 RUDY GIULIANI 4 NO PREFERENCE 1 NO PREFERENCE 2 BLANK 4 BLANK 1 WRITE-INS 3 746 1,120 State Committee Man State Committee Man State Committee Man JAMES McGOWAN 782 BRIAN P. BURKE 429 BLANK 1 BLANK 338 PAUL R. FERRO 96 1,120 BLANK 221 746 State Committee State Committee Woman State Committee Woman Woman KATHLEEN DONAGHUE 779 JEANNE S. KANGAS 470 BLANK 1 BLANK 341 BLANK 276 1,120 746 Town Committee Town Committee Town Committee GROUP GROUP BLANK JOHN S. OELFKE 542 KENDRA J. DUMONT 370 MARIAN E. STRONACH -CARDILLO 479 KEVIN C. HAYES, SR. 477 ELIZABETH KEDDY 487 DAN RAU 313 AMELIA S. GIONET 536 DONALD DENNING 1 LEONARDO M. GUERCIO, JR. 536 BLANK 24,949 ROBERT A. HUXLEY 485 STANLEY P. JURGA 547 MARJORIE E. MARCINKEWICZ 601 CHARLINE L. OELFKE 494 RICHARD W.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Presidential Primary
    Michigan Presidential Primary Facts and Statistics Michigan Department of State Bureau of Elections February 2019 MICHIGAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 1912 The legislature enacted Public Act 9 to direct that a presidential preference primary be conducted in the month of April. 1931 The legislature enacted Public Act 200 to repeal the presidential preference primary. 1972 The legislature enacted Public Act 60 to reestablish the presidential primary subject to the following provisions: • Primary would be held on the third Tuesday in May in presidential election years for each political party that received greater than 5% of the total vote cast nationwide in the last presidential election. • The Secretary of State would issue a list of individuals generally advocated by the national news media as potential candidates for president. The law also provided that the state political party chairpersons could provide the Secretary of State with a list of individuals whom they consider to be potential presidential nominees for their political party. The Secretary of State was then required to notify each candidate appearing on the lists who in turn was required to file an affidavit indicating his or her political party preference and willingness to have his or her name appear on the ballot. Individuals whose names did not appear on either the Secretary of State’s or a political party list could qualify as a candidate by filing nominating petitions. The petitions were required to be signed by registered electors equal to at least ½ of 1% of the total vote cast in the previous presidential election for the presidential candidate of the political party of the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court Tramples Gravel
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 61 | Issue 2 Article 7 1972 The uprS eme Court Tramples Gravel Lawrence R. Velvel Catholic University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Velvel, Lawrence R. (1972) "The uS preme Court Tramples Gravel," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 61 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol61/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Supreme Court Tramples Gravel By LAWRENCE B. VELvEL* From the standpoint of protecting political and civil free- doms, the cases decided by the Supreme Court during the last few weeks of its 1971 term were a mixed bag at best. It is true that some of the Court's rulings were favorable to those who would protect political freedoms: the cases which struck down governmental wiretapping without a warrant' and which pro- tected the right of SDS to official recognition on campus 2 would be two preeminent examples in this category. But it is equally true that, with the four Nixon justices providing the hard core, in a number of other cases the Court delivered some major blows to important political freedoms. The more prominent cases of this type come tripping quickly from the tongue.
    [Show full text]
  • Suceava, Romania
    IUFRO WP 7.03.10 Methodology of forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe “Recent Changes in Forest Insects and Pathogens Significance” Working Party Meeting 16‐20 September 2019 ‐ Suceava, Romania Meeting programme (overview) Monday, 16 September 2019 13:00 – 19:00 Arrival 17:00 – 19:00 Registration 19:30 Dinner Tuesday, 17 September 2019 07:30 – 08:30 Breakfast and registration 09:00 – 09:40 Conference welcome and opening 09:40 – 10:00 Phytosanitary situation of Suceava County forests 10:00 – 11:20 Meeting Session 1: Oral presentations (4 presentations) (hotel conf. hall) 11:20 – 11:40 Coffee break 11:40 – 13:00 Meeting Session 2: Oral presentations (4 presentations) (hotel conf. hall) 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 15:40 Meeting Session 3: Oral presentations (5 presentations) (hotel conf. hall) 15:40 – 16:00 Going to ”Ștefan cel Mare” University 16:00 – 17:30 Poster session (coffee break included) (University E Building hall) 17:30 – 19:30 Free time (optional short Suceava City tour) 19:30 Dinner 1 Recent Changes in Forest Insects and Pathogens Significance Meeting of IUFRO WP 7.03.10 Methodology of forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe Wednesday, 18 September 2019 07:30 – 08:30 Breakfast 08:30 Field trip Thursday, 19 September 2019 07:30 – 08:30 Breakfast 09:00 – 10:40 Meeting Session 4: Oral presentations (5 presentations) (hotel conf. hall) 10:40 – 11:00 Coffee break 11:00 – 12:40 Meeting Session 5: Oral presentations (5 presentations) (hotel conf. hall) 12:40 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 15:40 Meeting Session 6: Oral presentations (5 presentations) (hotel conf.
    [Show full text]