(Phase-3) in India Preliminary Design Work for Dh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Phase-3) in India Preliminary Design Work for Dh MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THE PREPARATORY STUDY FOR NORTH EAST NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PHASE-3) IN INDIA PRELIMINARY DESIGN WORK FOR DHUBRI-PHULBARI BRIDGE IN THE STATE OF ASSAM / MEGHALAYA ON NH-127B (LENGTH OF 20KM) ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT MAY 2018 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) PADECO CO. LTD. NIPPON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. PREPARED BY: ENVIRO INFRA SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD 301, 302, & 305, SHREE RAM BUSINESS CENTRE, PLOT NO. INS-12, SECTOR-9, VASUNDHARA, GHAZIABAD – 201012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background of the project ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Outline of the project .................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Purpose and Purpose of the Study ............................................................................... 3 1.4 Scope of the Study ...................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Geographical Extent ............................................................................................ 3 1.5 Principles of the Study ................................................................................................ 4 CHAPTER 2 Baseline Condition of the Natural and Social Environment ........................... 6 2.1 Natural Environment ................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Climate ................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1.3 Geology and Geography.................................................................................... 10 2.1.4 Geohydrology .................................................................................................... 12 2.1.5 Ecology ............................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Living Environment .................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Water Quality .................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 16 2.2.3 Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................... 18 2.2.4 Soil Quality ....................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Socio-economic Environment ................................................................................... 20 2.3.1 Assam State ....................................................................................................... 20 2.3.2 Meghalaya State ................................................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 3 Legal Framework .............................................................................................. 27 3.1 Major Laws and Regulations Relevant to the Project ............................................... 27 3.1.1 The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 .......................................................... 27 3.1.2 Notification of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Development Projects .............................................................................................................. 27 3.1.3 Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 ............................................................................ 28 3.1.4 The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 ................................................................... 29 3.1.5 The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (amended in 1988) ................................. 29 3.1.6 The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ............................. 29 3.1.7 The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 ................................. 29 3.1.8 The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ........................................................................... 29 3.1.9 The Land Acquisition Act, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 ............ 30 3.2 JICA/WB/ADB’s Guidelines for Environment and Social Considerations .............. 30 3.2.1 JICA Environmental and Social Guidelines ...................................................... 30 3.2.2 World Bank’s Environment Safeguard Policy ................................................... 31 3.2.3 Safeguard Policy of Asian Development Bank ................................................. 32 3.3 Comparison of JICA/WB/ADB Guidelines and EIA Regulations of India .............. 33 3.4 Central Level Institutions .......................................................................................... 36 3.5 State Level Institutions .............................................................................................. 37 3.6 Requirements of Environmental Clearance ............................................................... 38 3.7 Environmental Standards of India ............................................................................. 39 CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Alternatives .................................................................................... 47 4.1 Alternatives Subject to Analysis ............................................................................... 47 4.2 Criteria for Analysis of the Alternatives .................................................................... 48 4.3 Results of the Analysis of Alternatives ..................................................................... 49 4.3.2 Comparison of bridge alignment options .......................................................... 51 CHAPTER 5 Scoping Analysis ................................................................................................ 54 5.1 Procedures of Scoping Analysis ................................................................................ 54 5.2 Scoping Matrix: Preliminary Analysis of the Environmental Impacts ...................... 54 5.3 TOR of Natural and Socio-economic Environment Survey ...................................... 59 CHAPTER 6 Anticipated Environmental Impacts ............................................................... 63 6.1 Impacts on the living environment ............................................................................ 63 6.1.1 Survey Results ................................................................................................... 63 6.1.2 Anticipated Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................................. 72 6.2 Natural Environment ................................................................................................. 77 6.2.1 Survey Results ................................................................................................... 77 6.2.2 Anticipated Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................................. 88 6.3 Major Impacts on Social Environment...................................................................... 91 6.4 Impact Analysis ......................................................................................................... 95 CHAPTER 7 Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Plan ............................ 101 7.1 Environmental Management Plan ........................................................................... 101 7.2 Environment Monitoring Program ...........................................................................115 7.3 Institutional Arrangement .........................................................................................119 7.4 Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................................................................119 7.5 Monitoring Forms ................................................................................................... 120 7.6 Environmental Management Budget ....................................................................... 125 CHAPTER 8 Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................................... 126 8.1 1st Round Consultation ............................................................................................ 126 8.2 2nd Round Consultation ........................................................................................... 131 CHAPTER 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................ 136 9.1 Key issues / Concerns Identified ............................................................................. 136 9.2 Summary of Key Benefits from the project ............................................................ 136 9.3 Recommendations/conclusion ................................................................................. 138 9.3.1 Recommendations ........................................................................................... 138 9.3.2 Conclusion....................................................................................................... 138 Figure 1-1 Project Location ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • (2015), Volume 3, Issue 9, 1471- 1480
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue 9, 1471- 1480 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE Biodiversity, Ecological status and Conservation priority of the fishes of river Gomti, Lucknow (U.P., India) Archana Srivastava1 & Achintya Singhal2 1. Primary School , SION, Chiriya Gaun, Varanasi 2. Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: The studies of fish fauna of different water bodies were made by different workers. However, the study of ichthyofauna of the Gomti River at Lucknow Received: 15 July 2015 is scanty. This paper deals with the fish fauna of the Gomti river at Lucknow Final Accepted: 16 August 2015 o o Published Online: September 2015 (Latitude: 26 51N and Longitude: 80 58E). A systematic list of 70 species have been prepared containing two endangered, six vulnerable, twelve Key words: indeterminate and fifty not evaluated species, belonging to nine order, twenty one families and forty two genera respectively. Scientific names, Fish fauna, river Gomti, status, morphological character, fin-formula, local name, common name etc. of each biodiversity, conservation species was studied giving a generalized idea about finfishes of Lucknow. *Corresponding Author Copy Right, IJAR, 2015,. All rights reserved Archana Srivastava INTRODUCTION Biodiversity in relation to ecosystem function is one of the emerging areas of the research in environmental biology, and very little is known about it at national and international level. It is a contracted form of biological diversity encompassing the variety of all forms on the earth. It is identified as the variability among living organisms and the ecological complexes of which they are part including diversity between species and ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of West Bengal, India with Suggestions for Conservation of the Threatened and Endemic Species
    OCC SIO L PA ER NO. 263 Records of the Zoolog·cal Survey of India A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India w·th suggestions for · conservation of the threatened­ and endemic species R. P. BARMAN ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF IND A OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 263 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India with suggestions for conservation i o( the threatened and endemic species R.P.BARMAN Zoological Survey of India, F.P.S. Building, Kolkata-700 016 Edited by the Director, ZoolQ.§iaJl Survey of India, Kolkata ~ Jl'lfif Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Barman, R. P. 2007. A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India with suggestions for conservation of the threatened and endemic species. Rec. zool. Sllr~'. India, Oce. Paper No~, 263 : 1-48 (Published by the Director, Zoo I. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published: May, 2007 ISBN 978-81-8171-147-2 © Governl11enl of India, 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent. re-sold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hamilton, 1822) in a Wetland Ecosystem (Beel Dakatia), Southwestern Bangladesh
    Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ISSN 1110 – 6131 Vol. 25(3): 505 – 524 (2021) www.ejabf.journals.ekb.eg Growth, Condition, Maturity and Mortality of the Dwarf Gourami, Trichogaster lalius (Hamilton, 1822) in a Wetland Ecosystem (Beel Dakatia), Southwestern Bangladesh Newton Saha1*, Prosun Roy2, Zubyda Mushtari Nadia3, Wasim Akram4, Ferdous Ahamed1 5 and Md. Yeamin Hossain 1Department of Fisheries Management, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh 2Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh 3Department of Aquatic Animal Health Management, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh 4Department of Fish Genetics and Biotechnology, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh 5Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: The dwarf gourami, Trichogaster lalius, is a low-cost freshwater edible fish Received: Feb. 4, 2021 for the people of South Asian countries containing a variety of essential Accepted: April. 11, 2021 nutrients. The first wide-ranging explanation on the population parameters Online: June 18, 2021 specifically; length-frequency distribution (LFD), length-weight relationships _______________ (LWRs), length-length relationship (LLR), form factor (a3.0), condition factors (allometric, K ; Fulton’s, K ; relative, K ; relative weight, W ), size at first Keywords: A F R R sexual maturity (L ) and natural mortality (M ) of T. lalius were estimated. 768 Population parameter, m w specimens were collected over one calendar year (March 2019 to February Beel Dakatia, 2020) from a wetland ecosystem named Beel Dakatia, Khulna, southwestern Trichogaster lalius, Bangladesh through various traditional fishing gears.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Threatened
    Journal ofThreatened JoTT TBuilding evidenceaxa for conservation globally 10.11609/jott.2020.12.1.15091-15218 www.threatenedtaxa.org 26 January 2020 (Online & Print) Vol. 12 | No. 1 | 15091–15218 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) PLATINUM OPEN ACCESS ISSN 0974-7907 (Online); ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Publisher Host Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Zoo Outreach Organization www.wild.zooreach.org www.zooreach.org No. 12, Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti - Kalapatti Road, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Ph: +91 9385339863 | www.threatenedtaxa.org Email: [email protected] EDITORS English Editors Mrs. Mira Bhojwani, Pune, India Founder & Chief Editor Dr. Fred Pluthero, Toronto, Canada Dr. Sanjay Molur Mr. P. Ilangovan, Chennai, India Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society & Zoo Outreach Organization (ZOO), 12 Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, Web Design India Mrs. Latha G. Ravikumar, ZOO/WILD, Coimbatore, India Deputy Chief Editor Typesetting Dr. Neelesh Dahanukar Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, Maharashtra, India Mr. Arul Jagadish, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Mrs. Radhika, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Managing Editor Mrs. Geetha, ZOO, Coimbatore India Mr. B. Ravichandran, WILD/ZOO, Coimbatore, India Mr. Ravindran, ZOO, Coimbatore India Associate Editors Fundraising/Communications Dr. B.A. Daniel, ZOO/WILD, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Mrs. Payal B. Molur, Coimbatore, India Dr. Mandar Paingankar, Department of Zoology, Government Science College Gadchiroli, Chamorshi Road, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra 442605, India Dr. Ulrike Streicher, Wildlife Veterinarian, Eugene, Oregon, USA Editors/Reviewers Ms. Priyanka Iyer, ZOO/WILD, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Subject Editors 2016–2018 Fungi Editorial Board Ms. Sally Walker Dr. B. Shivaraju, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Founder/Secretary, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the Fish Stocks and Habitats of Regional, Global
    United Nations UNEP/GEF South China Sea Global Environment Environment Programme Project Facility NATIONAL REPORT on The Fish Stocks and Habitats of Regional, Global, and Transboundary Significance in the South China Sea THAILAND Mr. Pirochana Saikliang Focal Point for Fisheries Chumphon Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center 408 Moo 8, Paknum Sub-District, Muang District, Chumphon 86120, Thailand NATIONAL REPORT ON FISHERIES – THAILAND Table of Contents 1. MARINE FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT........................................................................................2 / 1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE FISHERIES SECTOR ...................................................................................2 1.1.1 Total catch by fishing area, port of landing or province (by species/species group).7 1.1.2 Fishing effort by gear (no. of fishing days, or no. of boats) .......................................7 1.1.2.1 Trawl ...........................................................................................................10 1.1.2.2 Purse seine/ring net....................................................................................10 1.1.2.3 Gill net.........................................................................................................12 1.1.2.4 Other gears.................................................................................................12 1.1.3 Economic value of catch..........................................................................................14 1.1.4 Importance of the fisheries sector
    [Show full text]
  • De Vertebrados De Moçambique Checklist of Vertebrates of Mozambique
    ‘Checklist’ de Vertebrados de Moçambique Checklist of Vertebrates of Mozambique Michael F. Schneider*, Victorino A. Buramuge, Luís Aliasse & Filipa Serfontein * autor para a correspondência – author for correspondence [email protected] Universidade Eduardo Mondlane Faculdade de Agronomia e Engenharia Florestal Departamento de Engenharia Florestal Maputo, Moçambique Abril de 2005 financiado por – funded by IUCN Mozambique Fundo Para a Gestão dos Recursos Naturais e Ambiente (FGRNA) Projecto No 17/2004/FGRNA/PES/C2CICLO2 Índice – Table of Contents Abreviaturas – Abbreviations..............................................................................2 Nomes vernáculos – vernacular names: .............................................................3 Referências bibliográficas – Bibliographic References ......................................4 Checklist de Mamíferos- Checklist of Mammals ................................................5 Checklist de Aves- Checklist of Birds ..............................................................38 Checklist de Répteis- Checklist of Reptiles ....................................................102 Checklist de Anfíbios- Checklist of Amphibians............................................124 Checklist de Peixes- Checklist of Fish............................................................130 1 Abreviaturas - Abbreviations * espécie introduzida – introduced species ? ocorrência duvidosa – occurrence uncertain end. espécie endémica (só avaliada para mamíferos, aves e répteis) – endemic species (only
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science ISSN 1816-4927 www.academicjournals.com OPEN ACCESS Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science ISSN 1816-4927 DOI: 10.3923/jfas.2016.361.369 Research Article Assessment of Species Specificity of Fishing Gears and Fish Diversity Status in the Andharmanik River of Coastal Bangladesh 1,2Md. Mizanur Rahman, 2Md. Bokthier Rahman, 1Emiko Okazaki and 3Mst. Nazira Akhter Rithu 1Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan 2Department of Fisheries Technology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Patuakhali, Bangladesh 3Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Rajshahi, 6205 Rajshahi, Bangladesh Abstract Background and Objective: In Southern Bangladesh, the Andharmanik river is an ichthyofaunal resourceful coastal water body due to adjacent to the Bay of Bengal. An investigation has been undertaken to identify available fishing gears and their specificity on the fishes as well as the fish diversity status of the river for a period of one year from November, 2014 to October, 2015. Methodology: The PRA tools were employed for data collection. Results: The survey revealed total 17 different types of fishing gears under 8 major groups of net. A total of 48 fish species under 10 orders and 26 families were identified by using these gears. Mesh size of the gears were varied from 0.508-15.24 cm depending on targeted fish species and some of them were very selective to specific species. Fish diversity was assessed by using Shannon-Weiner index (H), evenness (E), Simpson’s dominance index (D), Simpson’s index of diversity (1-D) and Margalef’s index (d) ranges between 3.33-3.42, 0.67-0.73, 0.042-0.048, 0.952-0.958 and 4.72-5.24, respectively for three stations of the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Threatened Taxa
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication An overview of fishes of the Sundarbans, Bangladesh and their present conservation status Kazi Ahsan Habib, Amit Kumer Neogi, Najmun Nahar, Jina Oh, Youn-Ho Lee & Choong-Gon Kim 26 January 2020 | Vol. 12 | No. 1 | Pages: 15154–15172 DOI: 10.11609/jot.4893.12.1.15154-15172 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Cauvery Mahseer
    The Future of the Cauvery Mahseer A report by the conservation sub-committee, Wildlife Association of South India . Bangalore April 2015 1 Table of contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………….……………………………………………3 History ……………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………5 Study Site ………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…….6 Research Methodology / Techniques ……………………………………………………..…………..7 Results ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………….………..8 1) Mahseer …………………………………….……………………………………………....………...8 2)Species Checklist ………………………………………………………………….………..………..9 3)Habitat Assessment ………………………………………………………………………………..11 4)The role of local ghillies in the conservation of mahseer …………………..….…..14 Summary Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………..…….……..16 1)Threats …………………………….………………………………………………………………...…..16 2)Recommendations …………………………………………………………………..……….……..18 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………….……………………………..…19 References ……………………………………………………………………………..…………………..………19 2 Executive Summary The ‘Humpback Mahseer’ of the Cauvery River Basin has been an enigmatic species amongst anglers the world over. The species has attracted the attention of professional and recreational anglers to the Cauvery River since the mid-18th century. This charismatic fish, often referred to as the tiger of the Cauvery River, has been WASI’s primary conservation focus and, under the association’s umbrella, has been the driving force behind one of South India’s most successful ecotourism models, running over the last four decades. Anglers believe that the ‘Humpback Mahseer’
    [Show full text]
  • And Chanda Nama (Hamilton, 1822) of M.Sc
    International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies 2017; 4(3): 89-92 ISSN 2347-2677 IJFBS 2017; 4(3): 89-92 Received: 12-03-2017 A comparison on the Length-Weight relationship and Accepted: 13-04-2017 relative condition factor of Parambassis ranga Jahid Sheikh (Hamilton, 1822) and Chanda nama (Hamilton, 1822) of M.Sc. 4th semester Student, Department of Zoology, Pandu Dora Beel (wetland) of Assam, India College, Guwahati, Assam, India Diganta Borgohain M.Sc. 4th semester Student, Jahid Sheikh, Diganta Borgohain, Rajesh Nag and Parag Deka Department of Zoology, Pandu College, Guwahati, Assam, India Abstract The present study reports the length-weight relationship, relative condition factor of two fish species Rajesh Nag Parambassis ranga (Hamilton, 1822) and Chanda nama (Hamilton, 1822) commonly known as Chanda M.Sc. 4th semester Student, in Assamese of Dora beel (wetland) of Assam. The growth performance of length-weight relationship is Department of Zoology, Pandu found moderate since the correlation coefficient ‘r’ reveals moderate degree of relationship and also College, Guwahati, Assam, India shows negative allometric growth. The negative allometric growth may be due to poorer feeding ability; Parag Deka environmental inappropriateness including physicochemical parameters; seasonal incompatibility Assistant Professor, Department including breeding seasons for proper growth of fishes etc. The present findings also indicate that the of Zoology, Pandu College, value of ‘b’ in all cases is lower than 3.0, being a constant for an ideal fish. The range of Kn value of Guwahati, Assam, India Parambassis ranga and Chanda nama are 0.49-2.28 and 0.60-1.52 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton, 1822) from Vettar River of Cauvery River
    © January 2018 | IJIRT | Volume 4 Issue 8 | ISSN: 2349-6002 Studies on Growth and Feeding Biology of Chanda Nama (Hamilton, 1822) from Vettar River of Cauvery River Basin Nagore, Tamil Nadu Bhuvaneswari. R1, P. Serfoji2 PG & Research Department of Zoology, Government Arts College (Autonomous), Kumbakonam-612 002 Abstract- The present study was carried out to elongate glass perchlet, (Chanda nama) is a determine the Length-weight relationship and feeding carnivorous, brackish water fish in the Asiatic biology of Chanda nama (Hamilton, 1822) belongs to glassfish family Ambassidae, of the only species in Ambassidae was collected during the period between the genus Chanda. It is native to an area of south January 2017 and March 2017 from Vettar river near Asia from Pakistan to Burma, in the Indomalaya Nagore Cauvery river basin of Tamil Nadu. In this study based on 75 specimens consisting ranging 5.0-8.5 ecozone. The family includes eight genera and about cm in total length and 1.20-5.66 gm in total weight. The 50 species. The family was formely known as the length-weight relationship of Chanda nama shows Chandidae, a name which ITIS continues to use. Fish negative allometric growth. The r2 values show the Base notes that Ambassidae, which were named by linear relationship between the length and weight of the Klunzinger in 1820, has priority over Chandidae, specimens. The food items in the stomach of Chanda which was created by Fowler in 1905. nama suggest that they are carnivorous. The gut The elongate glassy perchlet reaches a maximum content analysis was revealed that among the six overall length of 11cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Agassiz's Olive Glassfish Species Ambassis Agrammus Gunther, 1867
    FAMILY Ambassidae Klunzinger, 1870 - Asian glassfishes [=Bogodoidei, Ambassoidei, Parambassidae, Chandidae] GENUS Ambassis Cuvier, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1828 - common glassfishes [=Austrochanda, Blandowskiella, Konopickia, Priopidichthys, Priopis, Pseudoambassis, Velambassis] Species Ambassis agassizii Steindachner, 1867 - Agassiz's olive glassfish [=castelnaui, ifflaensis, muelleri, nigripinnis O, nigripinnis D, olivaceus, pallidus, wilkiensis] Species Ambassis agrammus Gunther, 1867 - sailfin glass perchlet [=reticulatus] Species Ambassis ambassis (Lacepede, 1802) - Commerson's glassy [=commersonii, gruendleri, klunzingeri, productus, roseus] Species Ambassis buruensis Bleeker, 1856 - Buru glass perchlet Species Ambassis buton Popta, 1918 - Buton glassy perchlet Species Ambassis elongata (Castelnau, 1878) - yellowfin glassfish Species Ambassis fontoynonti Pelegrin, 1932 - dusky glass perch Species Ambassis gymnocephalus (Lacepede, 1802) - bald glassy [=argyrozona, bleekeri, denticulata, dussumieri] Species Ambassis interrupta Bleeker, 1853 - longspined glass perchlet [=dalyensis, elevatus] Species Ambassis jacksoniensis (Macleay, 1881) - Port Jackson perchlet Species Ambassis kopsii Bleeker, 1858 - freckled hawkfish Species Ambassis macleayi (Castelnau, 1878) - Macleay's glass perchlet Species Ambassis macracanthus Bleeker, 1849 - estuarine glass perchlet [=batjanensis, vaivasensis] Species Ambassis marianus Gunther, 1880 - estuary perchlet [=convexus, ramsayi] Species Ambassis miops Gunther, 1872 - flagtailed glass perchlet [=flores,
    [Show full text]