Threatened and Endangered Species from FLA and FEIS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Trabuco Community Defense Project
United States Department of Agriculture Trabuco Community Defense Project Preliminary U.S. Forest Environmental Assessment Service April • 2010 Interdisciplinary Team members discuss the Trabuco Community Defense Project. Trabuco Ranger District • Cleveland National Forest 1147 East 6th St. • Corona, CA 92879 Orange and Riverside Counties, California T.6N., R.5W. and T.7S., R.6W., SBM Trabuco Community Defense Project – Preliminary Environmental Assessment 1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call toll free (866) 632-9992 (voice). TDD users can contact USDA through local relay or the Federal relay at (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (relay voice). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Trabuco Community Defense Project – Preliminary Environmental Assessment Contents Summary………………………………………….…………...…… 5 I Introduction………….………………….…………………………………………… 8 Background…………………………………………………………………. 8 Purpose and Need for Action………………………………………………… 11 Proposed Action…………………………………………………..………… 13 Decision Framework…………………………………………………………. 13 Public Involvement…………………………………………….…………….. 13 Issues……………………………………………………………………….. 14 II Alternatives……..…………………………………………………………………… 16 Alternative 1 – No Action……………………………………………………. -
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Annual Report to the Wildlife Agencies
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Report 2011 08 June 2012 Rare Plant Survey Report 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................1 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................2 SURVEY SITE SELECTION...................................................................................................................2 SURVEY METHODS ............................................................................................................................4 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ...............................................................................................................5 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................7 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................................7 -
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Annual Report to the Wildlife Agencies
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2017 Rare Plant Survey Report Mojave Tarplant (Deinandra mohavensis) 3 December 2018 2017 Rare Plant Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 1 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................................... 2 SURVEY METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 2 TRAINING ....................................................................................................................................... 3 DATA ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................5 MONITORING AND INVENTORY SURVEYS ............................................................................ 5 OBJECTIVES WITH ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS .............................................................. 5 SENTINEL SITE VISITS AND INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS -
Chapter 3 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Elsinore Valley Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapter 3 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL DRAFT | January 2021 CHAPTER 3 | ELSINORE VALLEY SUBBASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN | EVMWD Contents Chapter 3 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 3-1 3.1 Physical Setting and Topography 3-1 3.2 Surface Water Features 3-2 3.3 Soils 3-2 3.4 Geologic Setting 3-3 3.4.1 Pull-Apart Basin 3-3 3.4.2 Geologic Units 3-4 3.5 Faults 3-6 3.6 Aquifers 3-6 3.6.1 Description of Principal Aquifer Units 3-6 3.6.2 Physical Properties of Aquifers 3-7 3.6.3 Description of Lateral Boundaries 3-7 3.7 Structures Affecting Groundwater 3-8 3.8 Definable Basin Bottom 3-8 3.9 Cross Sections 3-8 3.9.1 Available Data and Information 3-9 3.9.2 Cross Section Construction 3-10 3.9.3 Hydrostratigraphic Evaluation 3-10 3.10 Recharge and Discharge Areas 3-11 3.11 Primary Groundwater Uses 3-11 3.11.1 Elsinore Hydrologic Area 3-11 3.11.2 Lee Lake Hydrologic Area 3-12 3.11.3 Warm Springs Hydrologic Area 3-12 3.12 Data Gaps in the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model 3-12 3.13 References 3-12 DRAFT | JANUARY 2021 | i pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/EVMWD/11585A00/Deliverables/RPT01/Ch03 EVMWD | ELSINORE VALLEY SUBBASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN | CHAPTER 3 Figures Figure 3-1 Subbasin Topography 3-17 Figure 3-2 Surface Water Bodies Tributary to Elsinore Valley Subbasin 3-19 Figure 3-3 Tributary Watershed 3-21 Figure 3-4 Subbasin Soil Hydrologic Properties 3-23 Figure 3-5 Surficial Geology 3-25 Figure 3-6 Cross Section Orientations 3-27 -
Geological and Soil Resources
FINAL APPLICATION FOR LICENSE OF MAJOR UNCONSTRUCTED PROJECT EXHIBIT E ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Section 6 – Report on Geological and Soil Resources LAKE ELSINORE ADVANCED PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT NUMBER 14227 Applicant: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY, INC. 2416 Cades Way Vista, California 92081 (760) 599-1813 (760) 599-1815 FAX September 2017 EXHIBIT E– REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES FERC PROJECT NO. 14227 Table of Contents Section Page 6.0. Report on Geological and Soil Resources .................................................................... 1 6.1. Geology and Soils Environmental Setting. .............................................................. 1 6.1.1. City of Lake Elsinore. ................................................................................... 2 6.1.2. United States Geological Survey Geologic Maps. ....................................... 3 6.2. Regional Geology. ................................................................................................. 10 6.3. Geologic Hazards. ................................................................................................. 12 6.4. Geotechnical Feasibility Report. ........................................................................... 16 6.5. Geology and Soils Regulatory Setting ................................................................... 18 6.5.1. California Public Resources Code. ............................................................. 18 6.5.2. California Government Code. .................................................................. -
Geology of the Western Half of the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, Riverside County, California
Geology of the Western Half of the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, Riverside County, California By: Daniel M. Loera, Jr. A thesis submitted to the faculty of California State University, Fullerton In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science In Geology Department of Geological Sciences California State University, Fullerton September 2003 1 2 Geology of the Western Half of the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, Riverside County, California By: Daniel M. Loera, Jr. Department of Geological Sciences California State University, Fullerton September 2003 3 ABSTRACT The Santa Rosa Plateau is located at the northern end of the Peninsular Range, just east of the Santa Ana Mountains and 2.4 km southwest of Murrieta, California. The erosionally dissected plateau is bound to the east by the Elsinore fault and is characterized by several basalt-capped mesas. There are no published comprehensive geologic investigations of the Santa Rosa Plateau and currently available geologic maps (most at a scale of 1:250,000) are insufficient for detailed work. This study provides (1) detailed geologic data in the form of mapped contacts, faults, folds, dikes, and other field relations; (2) interpretations of the data in terms of the intrusive, structural, depositional, and erosional history; and (3) a detailed geologic map (at a scale of 1:12,000) and report for the western half of the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve. The information gained from this field study will compliment Steve Turner’s field study of the eastern half of the reserve. The oldest rocks in the study area are metasedimentary rocks of the Bedford Canyon Formation (Jurassic) and metavolcanic rocks of the Santiago Peak Volcanics (Jurassic). -
Chapter 5 – Potentially Vulnerable Species: Plants
Chapter 5 Chapter 5 – Potentially Vulnerable Species: Plants The earth never tires: The earth is rude, silent, incomprehensible at first—Nature is rude and incomprehensible at first; Be not discouraged—keep on—there are divine things, well enveloped; I swear to you there are divine things more beautiful than words can tell. — Walt Whitman (1856) Key Questions • Which plant species are rare or at risk junct occurrences, or information is lacking in the coastal mountains and about their distribution and abundance. Some foothills of southern California? forests have developed a “watch list” to track • What is known about the status and these plants. distribution of each? With few exceptions, the plants addressed in this assessment are higher vascular plants • What factors threaten their continued and nomenclature follows the Jepson Manual persistence? (Hickman 1993). Virtually no evaluation was Using the fine-filter screening criteria (see done of the ferns, fern allies, bryophytes, li- description in the first section of chapter 4), chens, basidiomycetes, and ascomycetes in the we identified 256 plants occurring within or study area; however, their importance in for- near the assessment area which warrant indi- est ecosystems is well recognized. vidual consideration. Thirty of these species Our primary objective was to use the avail- are listed as threatened or endangered (table able information on the 256 identified plants 5.1) and thus legally protected under the fed- to assess their current status and vulnerability eral Endangered Species Act. Two additional within the assessment area, and, where pos- species are proposed for federal listing (table sible, identify their conservation needs.