U2U Brochure Spring 2021
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Solid Code Ebook
PUBLISHED BY Microsoft Press A Division of Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington 98052-6399 Copyright © 2009 by Donis Marshall and John Bruno All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Control Number: 2008940526 Printed and bound in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 QWT 4 3 2 1 0 9 Distributed in Canada by H.B. Fenn and Company Ltd. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Microsoft Press books are available through booksellers and distributors worldwide. For further infor mation about international editions, contact your local Microsoft Corporation office or contact Microsoft Press International directly at fax (425) 936-7329. Visit our Web site at www.microsoft.com/mspress. Send comments to [email protected]. Microsoft, Microsoft Press, Active Desktop, Active Directory, Internet Explorer, SQL Server, Win32, Windows, Windows NT, Windows PowerShell, Windows Server, and Windows Vista are either registered trademarks or trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. The example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted herein are fictitious. No association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place, or event is intended or should be inferred. This book expresses the author’s views and opinions. The information contained in this book is provided without any express, statutory, or implied warranties. -
Usability of the Sip Protocol Within Smart Home Solutions
4 55 Jakub Hrabovsky - Pavel Segec - Peter Paluch Peter Czimmermann - Stefan Pesko - Jan Cerny Marek Moravcik - Jozef Papan USABILITY OF THE SIP PROTOCOL UNIFORM WORKLOAD DISTRIBUTION WITHIN SMART HOME SOLUTIONS PROBLEMS 13 59 Ivan Cimrak - Katarina Bachrata - Hynek Bachraty Lubos Kucera, Igor Gajdac, Martin Mruzek Iveta Jancigova - Renata Tothova - Martin Busik SIMULATION OF PARAMETERS Martin Slavik - Markus Gusenbauer OBJECT-IN-FLUID FRAMEWORK INFLUENCING THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE IN MODELING OF BLOOD FLOW RANGE IN MICROFLUIDIC CHANNELS 64 21 Peter Pechac - Milan Saga - Ardeshir Guran Jaroslav Janacek - Peter Marton - Matyas Koniorczyk Leszek Radziszewski THE COLUMN GENERATION AND TRAIN IMPLEMENTATION OF MEMETIC CREW SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS INTO STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION 28 Martina Blaskova - Rudolf Blasko Stanislaw Borkowski - Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka 70 SEARCHING CORRELATIONS BETWEEN Marek Bruna - Dana Bolibruchova - Petr Prochazka COMMUNICATION AND MOTIVATION NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MELT FILTRATION PROCESS 36 Michal Varmus - Viliam Lendel - Jakub Soviar Josef Vodak - Milan Kubina 75 SPORTS SPONSORING – PART Radoslav Konar - Marek Patek - Michal Sventek OF CORPORATE STRATEGY NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF RESIDUAL STRESSES AND DISTORTIONS 42 OF T-JOINT WELDING FOR BRIDGE Viliam Lendel - Stefan Hittmar - Wlodzimierz Sroka CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION Eva Siantova IDENTIFICATION OF THE MAIN ASPECTS OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT 81 AND THE PROBLEMS ARISING Alexander Rengevic – Darina Kumicakova FROM THEIR MISUNDERSTANDING NEW POSSIBILITIES OF ROBOT ARM MOTION SIMULATION -
Logview Studio Linux Preparation with Mono
LogView Studio Linux Preparation with Mono 2014 by Dominik Schmidt [email protected] © 2014 Dominik Schmidt / Holger Hemmecke I LogView Studio Table of Contents Part I Linux Prepare 1 1 SSH Co..n..n..e..c..t. ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 Raspbe..r.r.y.. .P..i. ......................................................................................................................... 4 System Prepar..a..t.i.o...n.. ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Mono .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Install Mono......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Compile Mon..o.. .f.r..o..m.. .T..A...R....................................................................................................................................... 8 Compile Mon..o.. .f.r..o..m.. .G...I.T........................................................................................................................................ 9 Testing ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 3 Cubie.t.r.u..c..k.. ......................................................................................................................... -
Microsoft Exam Questions MS-600 Building Applications and Solutions with Microsoft 365 Core Services
Recommend!! Get the Full MS-600 dumps in VCE and PDF From SurePassExam https://www.surepassexam.com/MS-600-exam-dumps.html (100 New Questions) Microsoft Exam Questions MS-600 Building Applications and Solutions with Microsoft 365 Core Services Passing Certification Exams Made Easy visit - https://www.surepassexam.com Recommend!! Get the Full MS-600 dumps in VCE and PDF From SurePassExam https://www.surepassexam.com/MS-600-exam-dumps.html (100 New Questions) NEW QUESTION 1 - (Exam Topic 1) What are two possible URIs that you can use to configure the content administration user interface? Each correct answer present a complete solution. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point. A. Option A B. Option B C. Option C D. Option D Answer: BC NEW QUESTION 2 - (Exam Topic 1) How can you validate that the JSON notification message is sent from the Microsoft Graph service? A. The ClientState must match the value provided when subscribing. B. The user_guid must map to a user ID in the Azure AD tenant of the customer. C. The tenant ID must match the tenant ID of the customer’s Office 365 tenant. D. The subscription ID must match the Azure subscription used by ADatum. Answer: A Explanation: clientState specifies the value of the clientState property sent by the service in each notification. The maximum length is 128 characters. The client can check that the notification came from the service by comparing the value of the clientState property sent with the subscription with the value of the clientState property received with each notification. -
Marian Placko Solutions Architect (DB/BI/DW/EDH-DL) at UNIQA GSC Slovakia
Marian Placko Solutions Architect (DB/BI/DW/EDH-DL) at UNIQA GSC Slovakia Phone: 00421904206046 Address: Gorazdova 449/10 Nitra 94901 Slovak Republic Website: http://www.placko.eu/ Email: [email protected] A keen enthusiast in database systems (RDBMS, DW/BI, CloudDB, NoSQL and BigData Hadoop: DataLake/DataHub) as well as application development (based on .NET/C#, HTML/CSS/JS and Java-BigData related frameworks) following OOP/programming patterns in general. I am focused on BigData Hadoop platform Cloudera/Talend and data warehousing/business intelligence (Bill Inmon/Ralph Kimball methodology; SQL Server: database, integration, reporting, analysis services and data mining) as well as .NET/SharePoint (WinForms, ASP.NET WebForms/MVC, WebAPI etc.), workflow processes (.NET WF/WFS) and web services/WCF (SOAP, REST and GraphQL). Also fascinated with mobile development (Xamarin). Motto: “There are not bad and good technologies! Technologies are only improperly and properly implemented.” EXPERIENCE UNIQA GSC Slovakia (InsData, spol. s r. o.) Jun 2016 to Present Solutions Architect (DB/BI/DW/EDH-DL) Job description: # creation of demand solution concepts (incl. UML; mainly for DB/BI/DW/EDH-DL platforms: MS SQL Server, SAS, WebFocus, Cloudera Hadoop and Talend ETL/ELT/ESB) # creation of firewall rules (incl. infrastructure support) # solutions design and evaluation of technologies: ## ETL/ELT: Informatica, Talend and Apache Hadoop/MS SQL Server 2016+ Polybase ## NoSQL: MongoDB (incl. Docker, Azure and mLab) ### Big data introduction (https://placko.wordpress.com/2016/11/29/big-data-introduction/) ## BigData: Apache Hadoop platform - http://hadoop.apache.org/ and https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#big- data (incl. -
Numerical Simulation of Shear Driven Wetting
Numerical Simulation of Shear Driven Wetting Numerische Simulation schergetriebener Benetzung Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor-Ingenieur (Dr.-Ing.) eingereichte Dissertation von Daniel Rettenmaier aus Günzburg Tag der Einreichung: 12.11.2018 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.01.2019 Darmstadt — D 17 1. Gutachten: Prof. Dr. C. Tropea 2. Gutachten: Prof. Dr. D. Bothe Numerical Simulation of Shear Driven Wetting Numerische Simulation schergetriebener Benetzung Genehmigte Dissertation von Daniel Rettenmaier aus Günzburg 1. Gutachten: Prof. Dr. C. Tropea 2. Gutachten: Prof. Dr. D. Bothe Tag der Einreichung: 12.11.2018 Tag der Prüfung: 16.01.2019 Darmstadt — D 17 Bitte zitieren Sie dieses Dokument als: URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-85100 URL: http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/8510 Dieses Dokument wird bereitgestellt von tuprints, E-Publishing-Service der TU Darmstadt http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de [email protected] Die Veröffentlichung steht unter folgender Creative Commons Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.de Erklärung zur Dissertation Hiermit versichere ich, die vorliegende Dissertation gemäß §22 Abs. 7 APB der TU Darmstadt ohne Hilfe Dritter und nur mit den angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmitteln angefertigt zu haben. Alle Stellen, die Quellen entnommen wurden, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht worden. Diese Arbeit hat in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch keiner Prüfungsbehörde vorgelegen. Mir ist bekannt, dass im Falle eines Plagiats (§38 Abs.2 APB) ein Täuschungsversuch vorliegt, der dazu führt, dass die Arbeit mit 5,0 bewertet und damit ein Prüfungsversuch verbraucht wird. Abschlussarbeiten dürfen nur einmal wiederholt werden. Bei der abgegebenen Thesis stimmen die schriftliche und die zur Archivierung eingereichte elektronische Fassung gemäß §23 Abs. -
Comparative Studies of Programming Languages; Course Lecture Notes
Comparative Studies of Programming Languages, COMP6411 Lecture Notes, Revision 1.9 Joey Paquet Serguei A. Mokhov (Eds.) August 5, 2010 arXiv:1007.2123v6 [cs.PL] 4 Aug 2010 2 Preface Lecture notes for the Comparative Studies of Programming Languages course, COMP6411, taught at the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. These notes include a compiled book of primarily related articles from the Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia [24], as well as Comparative Programming Languages book [7] and other resources, including our own. The original notes were compiled by Dr. Paquet [14] 3 4 Contents 1 Brief History and Genealogy of Programming Languages 7 1.1 Introduction . 7 1.1.1 Subreferences . 7 1.2 History . 7 1.2.1 Pre-computer era . 7 1.2.2 Subreferences . 8 1.2.3 Early computer era . 8 1.2.4 Subreferences . 8 1.2.5 Modern/Structured programming languages . 9 1.3 References . 19 2 Programming Paradigms 21 2.1 Introduction . 21 2.2 History . 21 2.2.1 Low-level: binary, assembly . 21 2.2.2 Procedural programming . 22 2.2.3 Object-oriented programming . 23 2.2.4 Declarative programming . 27 3 Program Evaluation 33 3.1 Program analysis and translation phases . 33 3.1.1 Front end . 33 3.1.2 Back end . 34 3.2 Compilation vs. interpretation . 34 3.2.1 Compilation . 34 3.2.2 Interpretation . 36 3.2.3 Subreferences . 37 3.3 Type System . 38 3.3.1 Type checking . 38 3.4 Memory management . -
Deferred Cancellation
Deferred Cancellation A behavioral pattern Philipp Bachmann Institute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Clarastrasse 12 CH–4058 Basel, BS Switzerland [email protected] ABSTRACT General Terms People who design their own pool of worker threads [33, Design pp 290–298] or processes have to consider how to shut down the workers again or how to dynamically adapt the num- Keywords ber of workers to varying load. Especially with regard to application termination you may have the choice between an Patterns, Destructor, Actor, Reliability, Portability immediate destruction of the pool and a more graceful shut- down. The pattern proposed helps to portably implement Sir, my need is sore. such termination and load adaptation mechanisms that as- Spirits that I’ve cited My commands ignore. sume you voted for the second choice. The main area of application are the internals of active objects [40] and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: The Sorcerer’s similar designs that delegate work to a pool of threads or Apprentice [23] processes to execute service requests asynchronously from their actual invocation. For the pattern proposed we identified usage examples in 1. INTENT popular existing applications or libraries. Safely shut down pools of worker threads [33, pp 290– Both a real world example and sample code accompany 298] or processes without resource leakages and premature the pattern presentation. This sample code is in C++. rollback of transactions. The design proposed aims at The presentation of the pattern follows the style portability. well known from [11] and [44]. This pattern is based upon other patterns. Typographic conventions for references to other patterns are similar to [3]. -
05192020 Build M365 Rajesh Jha
05192020 Build M365 Rajesh Jha Build 2020 Microsoft 365 Rajesh Jha Monday, May 19, 2020 [Music.] (Video segment.) RAJESH JHA (EVP, Experiences & Devices): Hello, everyone. Thank you for being a part of Build 2020. It is such a pleasure to connect with you all virtually today. The fact that this conference can happen right now when we are all working and living apart is really remarkable. We are truly living in an era of remote everything, and it's clear that this is an inflection point for productivity. Microsoft 365 is the world's productivity cloud, and we aspire to make it the best platform for developers to build productivity solutions for work, life and learning. But we can't do it alone, we need you, and today, you're going to see how we can partner together to create the future of productivity. Our session today is for every developer, from ISVs building their own apps, to corporate developers creating custom solutions, to citizen developers using Teams and Power Platform. As an integrated security and productivity solution, Microsoft 365 is a one-stop shop for everything that people need right now, from remote work to telemedicine to learning. But it's not just a set of finished apps and services. It's also a rich developer platform. This stack diagram summarizes the key components. Our foundation is built on the Microsoft Graph. The Microsoft Graph is the container for all rich data and signals that describe how people and teams work together in an organization to get things done. -
Azure Forum DK Survey
#msdkpartner #msdkpartner Meeting Ground Rules Please post your questions in the chat – We aim to keep QnA at the end of each session Please mute yourself to ensure a good audio experience during presentations This meeting will be recorded #msdkpartner Today's Agenda 08:30 - 08:35 Welcome 08:35 - 09:15 Best of Build 09:15 - 10:00 Top 5 Reasons to chose azure (vs. on-premise) 10:05 - 10:25 Azure in SMB 10:25 - 10:30 Closing #msdkpartner #msdkpartner Hello! I’m Sherry List Azure Developer Engagement Lead Microsoft You can find me at @SherrryLst | @msdev_dk DevOps with Azure, GitHub, and Azure DevOps 500M apps and microservices will be written in the next five years Source: IDC Developer Velocity 100x 200x 7x 8x faster to set up a more frequent fewer failures on more likely to have dev environment code deployments deployments integrated security Source: DORA / Sonatype GitHub Actions for Azure https://github.com/azure/actions Azure Pipelines AKS & k8s support YAML CI Pipelines YAML CD Pipelines Elastic self-hosted agents Community and Collaboration In modern applications 90% of the code comes Your Code from open source Open Source Most of that code lives on GitHub Sign up for Codespaces Preview today https://github.co/codespaces Security and Compliance 70 Security and Compliance 12 56 10 42 7 LOC (M) LOC 28 5 Security Issues (k) Issues Security 14 2 Lines of code Security threats 0 0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr 2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 -
FORTH-ICS / TR 381 July 2006 'An Informal Proof on the Contradictory
FORTH-ICS / TR 381 July 2006 ‘An Informal Proof on the Contradictory Role of Finalizers in a Garbage Collection Context’ Anthony Savidis ABSTRACT Garbage collection in OOP languages provides facilities to hook code that is executed upon object finalization. Semantically, the point in time that finalizer code is executed is not determined by the application logic, but by the garbage collection system. This fact renders a potential mismatch, since application-specific code, i.e. the finalizer implementation, normally affecting program state and control flow, is called automatically at a point in time that is indifferent to the application semantics. Although an analogous situation is observed in event-based systems, since event processors are called-back asynchronously by the underlying system, there is a fundamental difference: while event generation is essentially nondeterministic, originated from external event sources, object destruction is a semantic action that is always decided by applications. In summary, the mismatch is that although applications decide if and when destruction occurs, the garbage collector is responsible to commit the relevant code. We prove that this mismatch is due to the contradictory presence of finalizers in a garbage collection context. Page 1 Introduction Preface This technical report has been also motivated by requests from colleagues to report the informal proof for the contradictory role of finalizers in garbage collection, simply relying on informal common software engineering principles. Additionally, the reporting has been also motivated by arguments that came to my attention via personal communication that either the claim cannot be proved (I assume that “cannot prove” arguments are subject to formal proofs, so such arguments are more weak than the claim they attack), or that the claim is trivial requiring essentially no proof (intuitively true, but does not explain why Java, C#, Python, just to name a few languages, still adopt finalizers). -
Microsoft SQL Server CLR Types Serialization Formats
[MS-SSCLRT]: Microsoft SQL Server CLR Types Serialization Formats Intellectual Property Rights Notice for Open Specifications Documentation . Technical Documentation. Microsoft publishes Open Specifications documentation for protocols, file formats, languages, standards as well as overviews of the interaction among each of these technologies. Copyrights. This documentation is covered by Microsoft copyrights. Regardless of any other terms that are contained in the terms of use for the Microsoft website that hosts this documentation, you may make copies of it in order to develop implementations of the technologies described in the Open Specifications and may distribute portions of it in your implementations using these technologies or your documentation as necessary to properly document the implementation. You may also distribute in your implementation, with or without modification, any schema, IDL's, or code samples that are included in the documentation. This permission also applies to any documents that are referenced in the Open Specifications. No Trade Secrets. Microsoft does not claim any trade secret rights in this documentation. Patents. Microsoft has patents that may cover your implementations of the technologies described in the Open Specifications. Neither this notice nor Microsoft's delivery of the documentation grants any licenses under those or any other Microsoft patents. However, a given Open Specification may be covered by Microsoft Open Specification Promise or the Community Promise. If you would prefer a written license, or if the technologies described in the Open Specifications are not covered by the Open Specifications Promise or Community Promise, as applicable, patent licenses are available by contacting [email protected]. Trademarks. The names of companies and products contained in this documentation may be covered by trademarks or similar intellectual property rights.