Phylogenetic Nomenclature, Three-Taxon Statements, And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogenetic Nomenclature, Three-Taxon Statements, And 2011 POINTS OF VIEW 887 Downloaded from sysbio.oxfordjournals.org Syst. Biol. 60(6):887–892, 2011 Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society of Systematic Biologists 2011. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syr070 Advance Access publication on August 24, 2011 Phylogenetic Nomenclature, Three-Taxon Statements, and Unnecessary Name Changes by guest on October 18, 2011 1, 2 KEVIN DE QUEIROZ ∗ AND MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE 1Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0162, USA; and 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8106, USA; ∗Correspondence to be sent to: Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, NHB, W-200, MRC 162, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA; E-mail: [email protected]. Received 4 April 2011; reviews returned 13 June 2011; accepted 16 June 2011 Associate Editor: Frank E. Anderson Criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature (see de Platnick’s argument involves a numerical comparison Queiroz and Gauthier 1994) and of the PhyloCode of the information content, as measured by implied (Cantino and de Queiroz 2010) have been addressed three-taxon statements (propositions about cladistic re- in the literature (e.g., de Queiroz 1997, 2006; Cantino lationships), of what he called “Linnaean classification” 2000; de Queiroz and Cantino 2001; Lee 2001; Bryant versus a “node-based system” (we place these terms in and Cantino 2002; Laurin et al. 2005; see http://www. quotation marks to indicate that they are misleading, as phylonames.org/ [literature/replies to critiques] for ad- will be explained below). Here, we show that Platnick’s ditional references). Many of the supposed problems re- negative conclusions about phylogenetic nomenclature sult from misunderstandings, whereas others can and are incorrect and result from inappropriate compar- have been dealt with by making appropriate adjust- isons. Moreover, they are based on a criterion that is ir- ments (including changes in the PhyloCode). One re- relevant for comparing different approaches to nomen- cent argument against phylogenetic nomenclature has clature. When a nomenclaturally relevant criterion is not yet been addressed, at least not in print. That argu- used, phylogenetic nomenclature outperforms its rank- ment was presented by Platnick in a debate that took based counterpart in all of the examples considered by place at the Linnean Society of London on 5 December Platnick. 2005 and was later published in his “Letter to Linnaeus” (Platnick 2009). Although we responded to Platnick’s ar- gument verbally during the debate, we take the oppor- THREE-TAXON STATEMENTS tunity to do so here because some readers of his letter Platnick’s comparisons are based on an example may believe that his conclusions are damaging to phy- originally used by de Queiroz and Gauthier (1994) logenetic nomenclature. to illustrate the consequences of phylogenetically 888 SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY VOL. 60 defined names in the context of a new hypothesis of [unranked] Agamidae (ABCDEFGHI) phylogenetic relationships. In that example, Agamidae [unranked] Chamaeleonidae (GHI) and Chamaelonidae (two lizard taxa traditionally ranked allows one to deduce only 18 three-taxon statements: as families) are composed of species that are origi- (GH)A, (GH)B, and so forth, representing a reduction nally thought to be mutually exclusive in terms of in the information content of the classification by about their cladistic relationships (Fig. 1a), but a new phy- 71%. logenetic hypothesis suggests that some of the species We do not dispute the number of three-taxon state- referred to Agamidae are more closely related to the ments that can be deduced from the two taxonomies; species in Chamaeleonidae than to other species in Agami- however, the comparison itself is inappropriate in that dae (Fig. 1b). This example is simplified from a real it matches a “Linnaean classification” under the original case described by Frost and Etheridge (1989), and phylogenetic hypotheses against a “node-based classi- Platnick’s presentation of it implicitly but incorrectly fication” under the new phylogenetic hypothesis. Ap- placed Agama in Clade ABC, which he treated as more propriate comparisons would use either the original distantly related to Chamaeleonidae than is clade DEF phylogenetic hypothesis or the new hypothesis, not a (under the new phylogenetic hypothesis). We have cor- mixture of the two. If we use the original hypothesis, rected his examples by applying names based on the the “node-based classification” name Agama to Clade DEF, the one that is more closely [unranked] Agamidae (ABCDEF) related to Chamaeleonidae, and we have applied a real [unranked] Chamaeleonidae (GHI) name (based on the name Leiolepis) to the more distantly related clade ABC. We have also added the more inclu- allows one to deduce the same 63 three-taxon state- sive taxon Acrodonta (which was not ranked but could ments as does the equivalent “Linnaean classification”; Downloaded from have been ranked as an infraorder) as it is relevant to no information is lost. Note that considering the taxa some of the examples. These changes were made for the to be unranked is irrelevant as phylogenetic nomencla- sake of accuracy, thus better connecting the examples ture does not prohibit the use of ranks. The only rele- vant consideration is that application of the names is de- to previous literature; none of them affect Platnick’s or sysbio.oxfordjournals.org our own conclusions about the number of implied three- termined by phylogenetic definitions. Conversely, if we taxon statements. use the new phylogenetic hypothesis, then a “Linnaean Under standard node-based phylogenetic definitions classification” based on uniting (lumping) the two fam- based on the original hypotheses of composition (Fig. 1), ilies (as in the actual proposal of Frost and Etheridge 1989) for the same two nested clades considered in the the names “Agamidae” and “Chamaeleonidae” end up by guest on October 18, 2011 referring to nested rather than mutually exclusive taxa “node-based classification” under the new phylogenetic hypothesis (Fig. 1b). Accor- Family Chamaelonidae (ABCDEFGHI) ding to Platnick, the original “Linnaean classification” Subfamily Chamaeleoninae (GHI) allows one to deduce the same 18 three-taxon statements Family Agamidae (ABCDEF) as under the corresponding “node-based classification.” Family Chamaeleonidae (GHI) Thus, regardless of whether the application of taxon names is governed by rank-based or phylogenetic defi- allows one to deduce 63 three-taxon statements: (AB)G, nitions, the taxonomies contain exactly the same amount (AB)H, AB(I), (AC)G, and so forth, whereas the “node- of information in the form of implied three-taxon based classification” statements. FIGURE 1. Example used by de Queiroz and Gauthier (1994) to illustrate the application of names under phylogenetic nomenclature in the context of different hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships. a) Original phylogenetic hypothesis, b) new phylogenetic hypothesis. Open and filled circles in the original example have been replaced with the letters A–F and G–I (respectively), aswasdoneby Platnick (2009), and the more inclusive taxon Acrodonta has been added. For the examples involving phylogenetically defined names in the sections Three-Taxon Statements and Unnecessary Name Changes, the following standard node-based definitions are used: Acrodonta = the smallest clade containing both A and G; Agamidae = the smallest clade containing both A and D; Chamaeleonidae = the smallest clade containing G, H, and I; Leiolepidinae = the smallest clade containing A, B, and C; Agaminae = the smallest clade containing D, E, and F. 2011 POINTS OF VIEW 889 The “Linnaean classification” based on lumping the [New name required] (DEFGHI) two families, as used in de Queiroz and Gauthier’s Agaminae (DEF) original example, is not the only possible way to make Chamaeleonidae (GHI) all names refer to monophyletic taxa under the new phylogenetic hypothesis and rank-based nomenclature. This taxonomy implies exactly the same number of Thus, Platnick considered two alternative “Linnaean three-taxon statements (81) as does the fully subor- classifications” under the new phylogenetic hypothesis: dinated “Linnaean classification.” In this case, both first, a taxonomy based on dividing (splitting) the family Acrodonta and Agamidae are considered candidate names Agamidae, rather than lumping it with Chamaeleonidae, for the largest clade because the PhyloCode is not yet but leaving the more inclusive clades (ABCDEFGHI and in operation and therefore precedence between those DEFGHI) unnamed: names has not been established. Thus, when appropriate comparisons are made Leiolepididae (ABC) between taxonomies (i.e., those based on the same phy- Agamidae (DEF) logenetic hypothesis and involving the same named Chamaeleonidae (GHI) clades), those taxonomies contain exactly the same And second, a fully subordinated taxonomy based on amount of information in terms of implied three-taxon both splitting and lumping in which all five hypothe- statements regardless of whether the taxon names are sized clades are named: governed by rank-based or phylogenetic nomenclature. This conclusion should be neither controversial nor sur- Chamaeleonoidea (ABCDEFGHI) prising because the information is contained in the tax- Leiolepididae (ABC) onomies, not in the names.
Recommended publications
  • The Sclerotic Ring: Evolutionary Trends in Squamates
    The sclerotic ring: Evolutionary trends in squamates by Jade Atkins A Thesis Submitted to Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Applied Science July, 2014, Halifax Nova Scotia © Jade Atkins, 2014 Approved: Dr. Tamara Franz-Odendaal Supervisor Approved: Dr. Matthew Vickaryous External Examiner Approved: Dr. Tim Fedak Supervisory Committee Member Approved: Dr. Ron Russell Supervisory Committee Member Submitted: July 30, 2014 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, friends, and mentors who helped me get to where I am today. Thank you. ! ii Table of Contents Title page ........................................................................................................................ i Dedication ...................................................................................................................... ii List of figures ................................................................................................................. v List of tables ................................................................................................................ vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... x List of abbreviations and definitions ............................................................................ xi Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA Mark N. Hutchinson & Stephen C. Donnellan 26. BIOGEOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE SQUAMATA This review summarises the current hypotheses of the origin, antiquity and history of the order Squamata, the dominant living reptile group which comprises the lizards, snakes and worm-lizards. The primary concern here is with the broad relationships and origins of the major taxa rather than with local distributional or phylogenetic patterns within Australia. In our review of the phylogenetic hypotheses, where possible we refer principally to data sets that have been analysed by cladistic methods. Analyses based on anatomical morphological data sets are integrated with the results of karyotypic and biochemical data sets. A persistent theme of this chapter is that for most families there are few cladistically analysed morphological data, and karyotypic or biochemical data sets are limited or unavailable. Biogeographic study, especially historical biogeography, cannot proceed unless both phylogenetic data are available for the taxa and geological data are available for the physical environment. Again, the reader will find that geological data are very uncertain regarding the degree and timing of the isolation of the Australian continent from Asia and Antarctica. In most cases, therefore, conclusions should be regarded very cautiously. The number of squamate families in Australia is low. Five of approximately fifteen lizard families and five or six of eleven snake families occur in the region; amphisbaenians are absent. Opinions vary concerning the actual number of families recognised in the Australian fauna, depending on whether the Pygopodidae are regarded as distinct from the Gekkonidae, and whether sea snakes, Hydrophiidae and Laticaudidae, are recognised as separate from the Elapidae.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gliding Lizard from the Early Cretaceous of China
    A gliding lizard from the Early Cretaceous of China Pi-Peng Li*, Ke-Qin Gao†, Lian-Hai Hou*‡, and Xing Xu*‡§ *Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, People’s Republic of China; †Peking University, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; and ‡Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, People’s Republic of China Edited by David B. Wake, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved February 7, 2007 (received for review October 27, 2006) Gliding is an energetically efficient mode of locomotion that has the absence of ossified carpals and poorly ossified tarsals. It is evolved independently, and in different ways, in several tetrapod 155 mm long, including an extremely slender 95-mm-long tail groups. Here, we report on an acrodontan lizard from the Early (Fig. 1). The entire body including the skull is covered with small Cretaceous Jehol Group of China showing an array of morpholog- granular scales, which show little size variation (Fig. 2 A–D). No ical traits associated with gliding. It represents the only known osteoderms are visible. The most striking feature of the speci- occurrence of this specialization in a fossil lizard and provides men is its superbly preserved membranous patagium, which is in evidence of an Early Cretaceous ecological diversification into an a half-open position, probably reflecting a postmortem relaxing aerial niche by crown-group squamates. The lizard has a dorsal-rib- of the folded ‘‘wing.’’ The patagium is internally supported by supported patagium, a structure independently evolved in the Late eight greatly elongated dorsal ribs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stem Acrodontan Lizard in the Cretaceous of Brazil Revises Early Lizard Evolution in Gondwana
    ARTICLE Received 5 Apr 2015 | Accepted 23 Jul 2015 | Published 26 Aug 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9149 OPEN A stem acrodontan lizard in the Cretaceous of Brazil revises early lizard evolution in Gondwana Tiago R. Simo˜es1, Everton Wilner2, Michael W. Caldwell1,3, Luiz C. Weinschu¨tz2 & Alexander W.A. Kellner4 Iguanians are one of the most diverse groups of extant lizards (41,700 species) with acrodontan iguanians dominating in the Old World, and non-acrodontans in the New World. A new lizard species presented herein is the first acrodontan from South America, indicating acrodontans radiated throughout Gondwana much earlier than previously thought, and that some of the first South American lizards were more closely related to their counterparts in Africa and Asia than to the modern fauna of South America. This suggests both groups of iguanians achieved a worldwide distribution before the final breakup of Pangaea. At some point, non-acrodontans replaced acrodontans and became the only iguanians in the Amer- icas, contrary to what happened on most of the Old World. This discovery also expands the diversity of Cretaceous lizards in South America, which with recent findings, suggests sphenodontians were not the dominant lepidosaurs in that continent as previously hypothesized. 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G2E9. 2 Centro Paleontolo´gico da UnC (CENPALEO), Universidade do Contestado, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil CEP 89300-000. 3 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G2E9. 4 Laboratory of Systematics and Taphonomy of Fossil Vertebrates, Departamento de Geologia e Paleontologia, Museu Nacional/ Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, Sa˜o Cristo´va˜o, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil CEP 20940-040.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrodont Iguanians (Squamata) from the Middle Eocene of the Huadian Basin of Jilin Province, China, with a Critique of the Taxon “Tinosaurus冶
    第 卷 第 期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 49 摇 1 pp.69-84 年 月 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 2011 1 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA 摇 figs.1-5 吉林桦甸盆地中始新世端生齿鬣蜥类 ( 有鳞目) 化石及对响蜥属的评述 1 1 孙 巍2 李春田2 Krister T德. 国S森M肯贝IT格H研究摇所和S自te然p历h史an博物F馆. 古K人. 类S学C与H麦A塞A尔L研究摇 部 法摇兰克福 摇 (1 摇 摇 60325) 吉林大学古生物学与地层学研究中心 长春 (2 摇 摇 130026) 摘要 中国吉林省中始新世桦甸组的两种端生齿鬣蜥类化石突显出端生齿类 在第 : (Acrodonta) 三纪早期的分化 第一种化石的特征为具有多个 个 前侧生齿位及单尖且侧扁的颊齿 。 (6 ) 。 其牙齿与牙齿缺失附尖的主要端生齿类 如鬣蜥亚科 的海蜥属 Hydrosaurus 无特别 ( Agaminae ) 相似之处 其亲缘关系也并不清楚 第二种的牙齿与很多现生有三尖齿的鬣蜥类 即蜡皮蜥 , 。 ( 属 Leiolepis 和飞蜥亚科 以及化石响蜥属的许多种相似 一个骨骼特征显示其可能 Draconinae) ; 与包括鬣蜥亚科 海蜥属 飞蜥亚科和须鬣蜥亚科 的支系有关 但尚需更多 、 、 (Amphibolurinae) , 更完整的标本以做结论 与现生鬣蜥类的比较研究表明 与响蜥属牙齿相似的三尖型齿很可 。 , 能是蜡皮蜥属及飞蜥亚科中大约 个现生种的典型特征 相对于这些支系 响蜥属的鉴定 200 。 , 特征并不充分 由于端生齿类的分化被认为始于新生代早期 因而东亚的化石材料很可能有 。 , 助于阐明这一支系的演化历史 尤其是结合分子遗传学的研究方法 然而仅基于破碎颌骨材 , 。 料的新分类单元名称的成倍增加并不能使我们更接近这一目标 尽力采集标本并研究可对比 , 的现生骨骼材料应是第一位的 。 关键词 中国吉林 始新世 桦甸组 端生齿类 鬣蜥科 响蜥属 衍征 : ; ; ; ; ; ; 中图法分类号 文献标识码 文章编号 :Q915. 864摇 :A摇 :1000-3118(2011)01-0069-16 ACRODONT IGUANIANS (SQUAMATA) FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE OF THE HUADIAN BASIN OF JILIN PROVINCE, CHINA, WITH A CRITIQUE OF THE TAXON “TINOSAURUS冶 1 1 2 2 DepartmKenrtisoftePralTae.oaSnMthrIoTpHolog摇y aSntdepMheassnel FRe.seKa.rcShCSHenAckAenLber摇g RSeUseaNrchWInesitit摇uteLaIndCNhuatnu鄄raTliaHnistory Museum (1 , 摇 Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany摇 krister. smith@ senckenberg. de) Research Center for Paleontology and Stratigraphy Jilin University (2 , Changchun 130026, China) Abstract 摇 Two acrodont iguanians from the middle Eocene Huadian Formation, Jilin Province, China, highlight the diversity of Acrodonta early in the Tertiary. The first is characterized by a high number (six) of anterior pleurodont tooth loci and by unicuspid, labiolingually compressed cheek teeth. These teeth, however, show noHsypdercoisaalusriumsilarity to those of major acrodontan clades in which the accessory cusps are absent (e.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Iguanian Lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa Sebastián Apesteguía, Juan D
    The first iguanian lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa Sebastián Apesteguía, Juan D. Daza, Tiago R. Simões, Jean Claude Rage To cite this version: Sebastián Apesteguía, Juan D. Daza, Tiago R. Simões, Jean Claude Rage. The first iguanian lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa. Royal Society Open Science, The Royal Society, 2016, 3 (9), pp.160462. 10.1098/rsos.160462. hal-01426066 HAL Id: hal-01426066 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01426066 Submitted on 4 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on January 4, 2017 The first iguanian lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org Sebastián Apesteguía1,JuanD.Daza2, Tiago R. Simões3 and Jean Claude Rage4 Research 1CEBBAD (CONICET), Fundación de Historia Natural ‘Félix de Azara’, Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775, 7°p (1405), Buenos Aires, Argentina Cite this article: Apesteguía S, Daza JD, 2Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, 1900 Avenue I Lee Simões TR, Rage JC. 2016 The first iguanian Drain Building Suite 300, Huntsville, TX 77341-2116, USA lizard from the Mesozoic of Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia Julie Rej East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia Julie Rej East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Paleontology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Rej, Julie, "Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3210. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3210 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Julie Rej May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven Wallace Dr. Chris Widga Keywords: Agamidae, Pogona, Ctenophorus, Tympanocryptis, Hastings Cave, Horseshoe Cave, Western Australia, Squamata, Late Quaternary ABSTRACT Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia by Julie Rej Fossil Agamidae from Western Australia have been the subject of limited study. To aid in fossil agamid identification, Hocknull (2002) examined the maxilla and dentary of several extant species from Australia and determined diagnostic characters for various species groups. In the study here, fossil agamids from two localities in Western Australia, Hastings Cave and Horseshoe Cave, were examined, grouped, and identified to the lowest unambiguous taxonomic level.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/4084574/Burrow Young1999.Pdf 1262 Burrow, C
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.19.882829; this version posted December 27, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under 1aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Recalibrating the transcriptomic timetree of jawed vertebrates 1 David Marjanović 2 Department of Evolutionary Morphology, Science Programme “Evolution and Geoprocesses”, 3 Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz Institute for Evolutionary and Biodiversity Research, Berlin, 4 Germany 5 Correspondence: 6 David Marjanović 7 [email protected] 8 Keywords: timetree, calibration, divergence date, Gnathostomata, Vertebrata 9 Abstract 10 Molecular divergence dating has the potential to overcome the incompleteness of the fossil record in 11 inferring when cladogenetic events (splits, divergences) happened, but needs to be calibrated by the 12 fossil record. Ideally but unrealistically, this would require practitioners to be specialists in molecular 13 evolution, in the phylogeny and the fossil record of all sampled taxa, and in the chronostratigraphy of 14 the sites the fossils were found in. Paleontologists have therefore tried to help by publishing 15 compendia of recommended calibrations, and molecular biologists unfamiliar with the fossil record 16 have made heavy use of such works. Using a recent example of a large timetree inferred from 17 molecular data, I demonstrate that calibration dates cannot be taken from published compendia 18 without risking strong distortions to the results, because compendia become outdated faster than they 19 are published. The present work cannot serve as such a compendium either; in the slightly longer 20 term, it can only highlight known and overlooked problems.
    [Show full text]
  • 81512597.Pdf
    1 A NEW LATE CRETACEOUS IGUANOMORPH FROM NORTH AMERICA AND THE 2 ORIGIN OF NEW WORLD PLEURODONTA (SQUAMATA, IGUANIA) 3 4 David G. DeMar, Jr.1, Jack L. Conrad†, Jason J. Head2, David J. Varricchio3, and Gregory P. 5 Wilson 1 6 7 1Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of 8 Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 9 2Department of Zoology and University Museum of Zoology, University of Cambridge, CB2 10 3EJ, Cambridge, UK 11 3Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA 12 Author for correspondence: 13 David G. DeMar, Jr. 14 [email protected] 15 Subject areas: 16 Palaeontology, phylogenetics, evolution 17 Keywords: Iguanomorpha, Pleurodonta, Cretaceous, Palaeogene, palaeobiogeography, 18 palaeoecology 19 20 †Deceased. Last places of employment: Department of Anatomy, NYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, 11568, USA and Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, 10024, USA. Date of passing: July 21, 2016. 1 21 Abstract 22 Iguanomorpha (stem + crown Iguania) is a diverse squamate clade with members that 23 predominate many modern American lizard ecosystems. However, the temporal and 24 palaeobiogeographic origins of its constituent crown clades (e.g., Pleurodonta [basilisks, iguanas, 25 and their relatives]) are poorly constrained, mainly due to a meager Mesozoic-age fossil record. 26 Here, we report on two nearly complete skeletons from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian) of 27 North America that represent a new and relatively large-bodied and possibly herbivorous 28 iguanomorph that inhabited a semi-arid environment. The new taxon exhibits a mosaic of 29 anatomical features traditionally used in diagnosing Iguania and non-iguanian squamates (i.e., 30 Scleroglossa) (e.g., parietal foramen at the frontoparietal suture, astragalocalcaneal notch in the 31 tibia, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Chameleons
    The Biology of Chameleons 5490036_FM.indd 1 03/10/13 11:57 AM 5490036_FM.indd 2 03/10/13 11:57 AM The Biology of Chameleons Edited by KRYSTAL A. TOLLEY and ANTHONY HERREL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London 5490036_FM.indd 3 03/10/13 11:57 AM University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2014 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The biology of chameleons / edited by Krystal Tolley and Anthony Herrel. pages cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-520-27605-5 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Chameleons. I. Tolley, Krystal. II. Herrel, Anthony. QL666.L23b56 2013 597.95’6—dc23 2013026609 Manufactured in the United States of America 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso Z39.48-1992 (r 2002) (Permanence of Paper). 8 Cover illustration: Trioceros johnstoni from the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. Photo by Michele Menegon. 5490036_FM.indd 4 03/10/13 11:57 AM CONTENTS Contributors viii Foreword xi 1 Biology of the Chameleons: An Introduction 1 Krystal A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Chameleons
    The Biology of Chameleons 5490036_FM.indd 1 03/10/13 11:57 AM 5490036_FM.indd 2 03/10/13 11:57 AM The Biology of Chameleons Edited by KRYSTAL A. TOLLEY and ANTHONY HERREL UNIV ERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London 5490036_FM.indd 3 03/10/13 11:57 AM University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2014 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The biology of chameleons / edited by Krystal Tolley and Anthony Herrel. pages cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-520-27605-5 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Chameleons. I. Tolley, Krystal. II. Herrel, Anthony. QL666.L23b56 2013 597.95’6—dc23 2013026609 Manufactured in the United States of America 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso Z39.48-1992 (r 2002) (Permanence of Paper). 8 Cover illustration: Trioceros johnstoni from the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. Photo by Michele Menegon. 5490036_FM.indd 4 03/10/13 11:57 AM CONTENTS Contributors viii Foreword xi 1 Biology of the Chameleons: An Introduction 1 Krystal A.
    [Show full text]
  • Universality of Indeterminate Growth in Lizards Rejected
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Universality of indeterminate growth in lizards rejected: the micro-CT reveals contrasting timing of growth cartilage persistence in iguanas, agamas, and chameleons Petra Frýdlová 1,3, Jana Mrzílková 2,3, Martin Šeremeta2,3, Jan Křemen2,3, Jan Dudák 4, Jan Žemlička 4, Pavel Němec 1, Petr Velenský5, Jiří Moravec6, Daniel Koleška7, Veronika Zahradníčková1, Tomáš Jirásek8, Petr Kodym9, Daniel Frynta 1* & Petr Zach 2,3 Squamate reptiles are considered to exhibit indeterminate growth. Nevertheless, current literature disputes the available defnitions of this growth type, presents new theoretical models, and questions its universality in cold-blooded vertebrates. We have followed up on our previous research employing micro-CT to explore growth plate cartilage (GPC) in the epiphysis of long bones, which is responsible for longitudinal skeletal growth by the endochondral ossifcation process. We focused on numerous and highly diversifed group of the Iguania clade comprising Acrodonta (agamas and chameleons) and Pleurodonta (“iguanas”). We recorded the absence of GPC in most of the examined adult Pleurodonta specimens and interpret it as an irreversible arrest of skeletal growth. This fnding clearly rejects the universality of indeterminate growth in lizards. On the other hand, we found apparent GPC preservation in most of the adult specimens belonging to Acrodonta. This suggests a preserved ability to continue body growth throughout most of their life. We discuss the uncovered disparity between Acrodonta and Pleurodonta and emphasize the importance of GPC degradation timing. Postnatal skeletal growth connected with the increase in skeletal size is traditionally divided into the determinate and indeterminate type1. Te main diference is in the ability to continue growth throughout the life in indetermi- nate growers, while the determinate ones cease their skeletal growth typically close to sexual maturation2.
    [Show full text]